Interest Rates Theories
Interest Rates Theories
Interest Rates Theories
One of the oldest theories developed during eighteenth and nineteenth centuries by a number
of British Economist refined by Austrian economist Bohm-Bawerk, and elaborated by Irving Fisher early
in the twentieth century (Rose 1994). It is therefore alternatively referred to as the Fisher hypothesis
(Thomas 1997).
1. Supply of Saving
4. The difference between foreign demand for loanable funds and the volume of loanable funds
supplied by foreigners to the domestic economy= the difference between current exports from and
imports into the domestic economy.
In 1930, John Maynard Keynes introduced the concept of money demand and used the term
“liquidity preference” for money demand, this is the reason this theory is called liquidity
preference theory.
This theory stipulates that the interest rate is determined in the money market by the money
demand and the money supply. Interest rate is the point where the money demand is equal to
money supply.
like the other theories, this theory also has its limitations. It is a short-term approach to interest
rate determination. In longer- term, interest rates are affected by changes in the level of income
and inflationary expectations.
Rational expectations theory came about in the advent of the information age.
It is based on the premise that the financial markets are highly efficient institutions in digesting
new information affecting interest rates and security prices.
In contrast to adoptive expectations, which is backward-looking, relying on the past data or
experience, rational expectations, introduced by Lucas in 1973 (Thomas 1997), is forward
looking and uses all available information in forming expectations. This means that households
and firms are forward looking.
The rational expectations theory views that forecasting interest rates requires knowledge of the
public’s current set of expectations. If new information is sufficient to alter those expectation,
interest rates must change. If correct, this portion of the rational expectation theory creates
significant problems for government policymakers.