1335 5248 1 PB
1335 5248 1 PB
1335 5248 1 PB
Ozlem Yagcioglui
Full-time instructor, Dokuz Eylul University,
School of Foreign Languages, Izmir, Turkey
Abstract:
Reading competence is one of the main foreign language learning skills in English
language teaching. All students who learn reading in ELT classes need motivation, and
there are different methods of motivating students in reading classes. Brain-compatible
learning and teaching is one of the most useful strategies in English language
education. This paper deals with brain based learning strategies in reading classes.
Brain based learning strategies will be examined and brain based learning theory will
be highlighted. Sample activities and exercises will be given, and useful websites and
books will be suggested.
Keywords: Brain based learning strategies; Brain based learning theory; sample
classroom activities
1. Introduction
Language learners must be motivated effectively to gain all language skills such as
reading, writing, speaking and listening. Reading competence is one of the fundamental
skills which a language learner should always develop. As it is generally known, there
are lots of methods and approaches which can be used in language teaching and
learning. In recent years, new methods and approaches have been developed to be
used. Brain- compatible teaching is not a new method, but new techniques and
approaches have been developed with the help of this method.
This study is based on the classroom observations of my own teaching situation
to answer the question; ‚How can I make my class hours more joyful in order to make
students more active and talkative during their reading classes?‛ I tried to jazz up my classes
to increase my students’ reading skills.
2. Theoretical Background
‚Brain teaching emphasizes how the brain learns naturally and is based on what we
currently know about the actual structures and functions of the brain at several
developmental stages. Although brain-compatible teaching is not a panacea or magic
bullet to solve all of education’s problems, as teachers we must understand certain
principles and use effective strategies in purposeful ways. In other words, we must
understand the reasoning behind our teaching.‛
‚…the notion of learning style as a set of preferences and the notion of learning style as
a specific aptitude are very closely intertwined in many discussions of learning styles.
Moreover, it is our impression that among the general public, the notion of learning
styles and the notion of differential abilities are scarcely distinguished at all. There is,
after all, a commonsense reason why the two concepts could be conflated: Namely,
different modes of instruction might be optimal for different people because different
modes of presentation exploit the specific perceptual and cognitive strengths of different
individuals, as suggested by the meshing hypothesis. Similar to the learning-styles
hypothesis, the idea of specific abilities also implies a special form of crossover interaction.
However, the interaction is different in kind from what was outlined earlier as the key
test of the learning-styles hypothesis.‛
‚In order to understand the theory of learning styles it appears to be logical to start from
individual differences. Of course, the history of learning styles is closely connected with
the history of individual differences or individualities. More precisely, the term ‚learning
style‛ could have been subsequently developed from the term ‚individual difference‛.
Thus, we can say that the individual difference could be a basis of today’s concept of
learning style.‛
‚Learning Styles were developed by Peter Honey and Alan Mumford, based upon the
work of Kolb, and they identified four distinct learning styles or preferences: Activist,
Theorist; Pragmatist and Reflector. These are the learning approaches that individuals
naturally prefer and they recommend that in order to maximise one's own personal
learning each learner ought to:
understand their learning style
seek out opportunities to learn using that style‛
The characteristics of the four learning styles have been summarized in the
following table, according to Mobbs (2003):
Learning
Attributes Activities VLE Opportunities
style
3. Method
3. 1. 1. Participants
The participants consisted of 120 university students at Dokuz Eylul University in the
city of Izmir in Turkey. Their ages ranged from 19-23.
3.2.1 Directions
1. Students were assigned a different vocabulary word.
2. During the class hours, students wrote down other words they heard or read that
helped them describe their vocabulary word.
3. In the other box, a picture of what the word reminded them of or looked like in
their mind was drawn by the students.
Vocabulary Word
Interdependence Chains
1. Which of these ‘places’ have you heard of? What do you think they have in common?
Utopia Shangri-La Atlantis El Dorado
2. Read the article. Then match the places with their ‘locations’.
1. Utopia a. South America
2. Shangri-La b. the Atlantic Ocean
3. Atlantis c. the Mediterranean Sea
4. El Dorado d. Asia
3. Put the words into the table, according to which legendary they refer to.
earthquake easy money expedition fictional island
longer life lost city of gold lost civilization
mystical valley natural disaster perfect society tribal chief
Utopia
Shangri-La
Atlantis earthquake
El Dorado
Step 3: I read the reading passage loudly twice to my students. I also asked them if
there were any new words for them in that passage. I explained the definitions of the
new words in that passage.
3.3.3. Objectives
1. To give students the chance to practice English as much as possible
2. To teach students new words while they are reading the new passages
3. To teach students the pronunciations of the new words effectively
4. To encourage students to participate in role-playing activities
5. To encourage students to join in group and pair-work discussions during class
hours
6. To encourage students to answer the questions of the exercises on reading
passages to increase their fluency in English
7. To encourage students to be more positive and optimistic while learning English
8. To help students to increase their thinking skills while attending pair work or
group work discussions
3.4. Findings
In each of these classes, there were Turkish university students from different faculties
at Dokuz Eylul University. Students accepted increasing reading competence would be
useful for their professional developments. They enjoyed reading English passages,
jokes and dialogues from different sources. They also liked using the internet and
Google for their studies.
4. Conclusion
Reading comprehension is one of the basic skills in English language learning. There are
lots of approaches and methods to motivate our students in reading classes. Brain-
compatible teaching and learning is one of the essential methods in contemporary
English language teaching classes. Students have the opportunity to learn new things
according to their tastes and likes with the help of the brain-compatible teaching
methods.
In this paper, brain compatible teaching and learning has been examined, as has
Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences. Learning styles and the characteristics of the
four learning styles have been summarized, with sample classroom activities suggested
for each. It is hoped that this study will help my colleagues to do more enjoyable
courses. It is also hoped that students in the ESL or ELT classes will get more benefits
with this study.
References
1. Campbell, R. & Tennant, A. (2011). Reading: Magical & mysterious places. Upper
Intermediate Global Workbook. p.p. 26-27. Oxford: Macmillan Education.
2. Haley, M. H. (2010). Interdependence Chains. Brain-Compatible Differentiated
Instruction for English Language Learners. p. 155.Boston, New York: USA. Pearson.
3. Haley, M. H. (2010). Word Chart. Brain-Compatible Differentiated Instruction for
English Language Learners. p. 160.Boston, New York: USA. Pearson.
4. Mobbs, R. (2003). Honey and Mumford Learning Styles. Retrieved 12 November
2017from:
http://www.le.ac.uk/users/rjm1/etutor/resources/learningtheories/honeymumfor
d.html
5. Mobbs, R. (2003). Learning Theories. Retrieved 12 November 2017 from:
6. http://www.le.ac.uk/users/rjm1/etutor/resources/learningtheories/learningtheori
esindex.html
7. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D. and Bjork, R. (2008) What evidence is
Necessary to Validate Interventions Based On Learning Styles?: Primary Mental
Abilities: Relation to Learning Styles. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. p.
109. Volume: 9, No. 3. Retrieved 12 November 2017 from:
http://www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/pspi/PSPI_9_3.pdf
8. Šabatová, J. (2008). Learning Styles in ELT. Diploma Thesis. Masaryk University
Brno. Faculty of Education. Retrieved 12 November 2017 from:
http://is.muni.cz/th/104803/pedf_m/Learning_Styles_in_ELTsabatovajarmila.pdf
Appendix 1
Links for Multiple Intelligences Theory and Applications