Agreement

E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3/Add.
156
4 March 2021
Agreement
Concerning the Adoption of Harmonized Technical United Nations
Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be
Fitted and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for
Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of these
United Nations Regulations*
(Revision 3, including the amendments which entered into force on 14 September 2017)
_________
Addendum 156 – UN Regulation No. 157
Date of entry into force as an annex to the 1958 Agreement: 22 January 2021
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to

Automated Lane Keeping Systems
This document is meant purely as documentation tool. The authentic and legal binding text
is: ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2020/81.
_________
UNITED NATIONS
*
Former titles of the Agreement:
Agreement concerning the Adoption of Uniform Conditions of Approval and Reciprocal Recognition of
Approval for Motor Vehicle Equipment and Parts, done at Geneva on 20 March 1958 (original version);
Agreement concerning the Adoption of Uniform Technical Prescriptions for Wheeled Vehicles,
Equipment and Parts which can be Fitted and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for
Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of these Prescriptions, done at Geneva on
5 October 1995 (Revision 2).
3
E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3/Add.156
UN Regulation No. 157
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with

regard to Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Contents
Page
Regulation
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5
1. Scope and purpose............................................................................................................................ 6
2. Definitions ........................................................................................................................................ 6
3. Application for approval .................................................................................................................. 8
4. Approval........................................................................................................................................... 8
5. System Safety and Fail-safe Response ............................................................................................. 9
6. Human Machine Interface / Operator Information ........................................................................... 13
7. Object and Event Detection and Response ....................................................................................... 19
8. Data Storage System for Automated Driving ................................................................................... 20
9. Cybersecurity and Software-Updates ............................................................................................... 21
10. Modification of vehicle type and extension of approval .................................................................. 22
11. Conformity of production................................................................................................................. 23
12. Penalties for non-conformity of production ..................................................................................... 23
13. Production definitively discontinued ................................................................................................ 23
14. Names and addresses of Technical Services responsible for conducting approval tests and of
Type Approval Authorities............................................................................................................... 24
Annexes
1 Communication ................................................................................................................................ 25
2 Arrangements of approval marks ..................................................................................................... 32
3 (Reserved) ........................................................................................................................................ 33
4 Special requirements to be applied to the safety aspects of electronic control systems and Audit .. 34
5 Test Specifications for ALKS .......................................................................................................... 64
3
Introduction
The intention of the Regulation is to establish uniform provisions concerning the
approval of vehicles with regard to Automated Lane Keeping Systems (ALKS).
ALKS controls the lateral and longitudinal movement of the vehicle for extended
periods without further driver command. ALKS is a system whereby the activated system is
in primary control of the vehicle.
This Regulation is the first regulatory step for an automated driving system (as defined
in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1140) in traffic and it therefore provides innovative provisions aimed
at addressing the complexity related to the evaluation of the system safety. It contains
administrative provisions suitable for type approval, technical requirements, audit and
reporting provisions and testing provisions.
ALKS can be activated under certain conditions on roads where pedestrians and
cyclists are prohibited and which, by design, are equipped with a physical separation that
divides the traffic moving in opposite directions and prevent traffic from cutting across the
path of the vehicle. In a first step, the original text of this Regulation limits the operational
speed to 60 km/h maximum and passenger cars (M1 vehicles).
This Regulation includes general requirements regarding the system safety and the
failsafe response. When the ALKS is activated, it shall perform the driving task instead of
the driver, i.e. manage all situations including failures, and shall not endanger the safety of
the vehicle occupants or any other road users. There is however always the possibility for the
driver to override the system, at any time.
The Regulation also lays down requirements on how the driving task shall be safely
handed over from the ALKS to the driver including the capability for the system to come to
a stop in case the driver does not reply appropriately.
Finally, the Regulation includes requirements on the Human-Machine Interface
(HMI) to prevent misunderstanding or misuse by the driver. The Regulation for instance
requires that on-board displays used by the driver for other activities than driving when the
ALKS is activated, shall be automatically suspended as soon as the system issues a transition
demand. These measures are without prejudice to driver behaviour rules on how to use these
systems in the Contracting Parties as currently being discussed by the Global Forum for Road
Traffic Safety (WP.1) at the time of drafting this document (See e.g. Informal Document 4
Revision 1 of the seventy-eight session of WP.1).
4
1. Scope and purpose

1.1. This Regulation applies to the type approval of vehicles of Category M 11 with
regards to their Automated Lane Keeping System.
2. Definitions
For the purposes of this Regulation:
2.1. "Automated Lane Keeping System (ALKS)" for low speed application is a
system which is activated by the driver and which keeps the vehicle within its
lane for travelling speed of 60 km/h or less by controlling the lateral and
longitudinal movements of the vehicle for extended periods without the need
for further driver input.
Within this Regulation, ALKS is also referred to as "the system".
2.1.1. "Vehicle Type with regard to Automated Lane Keeping System (ALKS)" means
a category of vehicles which do not differ in such essential aspects as:
(a) Vehicle features which significantly influence the performances of
ALKS;
(b) The system characteristics and design of ALKS.
2.2. "Transition demand" is a logical and intuitive procedure to transfer the
Dynamic Driving Task (DDT) from the system (automated control) to the
human driver (manual control). This request is given from the system to the
human driver.
2.3. "Transition phase" means the duration of the transition demand.
2.4. "Planned event" is a situation which is known in advance, e.g. at the time of
activation such as a journey point (e.g. exit of a highway) etc. and which
requires a transition demand.
2.5. "Unplanned event" is a situation which is unknown in advance, but assumed
as very likely in happening, e.g. road construction, inclement weather,
approaching emergency vehicle, missing lane marking, load falling from truck
(collision) and which requires a transition demand.
2.6. "Imminent collision risk" describes a situation or an event which leads to a
collision of the vehicle with another road user or an obstacle which cannot be
avoided by a braking demand with lower than 5 m/s2.
2.7. "Minimum Risk Manoeuvre (MRM)" means a procedure aimed at minimising
risks in traffic, which is automatically performed by the system after a
transition demand without driver response or in the case of a severe ALKS or
vehicle failure.
2.8. "Emergency Manoeuvre (EM)" is a manoeuvre performed by the system in
case of an event in which the vehicle is at imminent collision risk and has the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating a collision.
2.9. Speed
2.9.1. "Specified maximum speed" is the speed declared by the manufacturer up to
which the system operates under optimum conditions.
2.9.2. "Maximum operational speed" is the speed selected by the system up to which
the system operates under current environmental and sensor conditions. It is
the maximum vehicle speed at which the system may be active and shall be
1 As defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.), document

ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.6, para. 2 -
www. unece.org/transport/standards/transport/vehicle-regulations-wp29/resolutions
5
determined by the capability of the sensing system as well as the environmental

conditions.
2.9.3. "Present speed" or "speed" is the current speed selected by the system due to
traffic.
2.10. "Detection range" of the sensing system is the distance at which the system
can reliably recognise a target, taking account of the deterioration of
components of the sensing system due to time and usage throughout the
lifetime of the vehicle and generate a control signal.
2.11. Failures
2.11.1. An "ALKS failure" is any single failure specific to the operation of the ALKS
(e.g. single sensor failure, loss of necessary calculation data for the driving
path of the vehicle).
2.11.2. "Failure mode" is the operation status of the system in which the system
operates with an ALKS failure.
2.11.3. A "severe ALKS failure" is a failure specific to the operation of the ALKS that
affects the safe operation of the system when in failure mode with a very low
probability of occurrence such as generally used for essential components as
e.g. an electronic control unit. Single sensor failures are only considered as
such when accompanied by another influence affecting the safe operation of
the system.
2.11.4. A "severe vehicle failure" is any failure of the vehicle (e.g. electrical,
mechanical) that affects the ability of the ALKS to perform the DDT and would
also affect the manual operation of the vehicle (e.g. loss of power supply,
failure of the braking system, sudden loss of tire pressure).
2.12. "Self-check" means an integrated function which checks for any system failure
and for the detection range of the sensing system on a continuous basis.
2.13. A "system override" by the driver means a situation when the driver provides
an input to a control which has priority over the longitudinal or lateral control
of the system, while the system is still active.
2.14. "Dynamic Driving Task (DDT)" is the control and execution of all longitudinal
and lateral movements of the vehicle.
2.15. "Data Storage System for Automated Driving (DSSAD)" enables the
determination of interactions between the ALKS and the human driver.
2.16. "Lifetime of the system" is the period of time during which the ALKS system
is available, as a function, on the vehicle.
2.17. "Occurrences" means, in the context of DSSAD provisions in paragraph 8, an
action or instance of an arising event or incident, which requires storage within
the data storage system.
2.18. "R15X Software Identification Number (R15X SWIN)" means a dedicated
identifier, defined by the vehicle manufacturer, representing information about
the type approval relevant software of the Electronic Control System
contributing to the UN Regulation No. 15X type approval relevant
characteristics of the vehicle.
2.19. "Electronic control system" means a combination of units, designed to co-
operate in the production of the stated automated lane keeping function by
electronic data processing. Such systems, commonly controlled by software,
are built from discrete functional components such as sensors, electronic
control units and actuators and connected by transmission links. They may
include mechanical, electro-pneumatic or electro-hydraulic elements.
2.20. "Software" means the part of an Electronic Control System that consists of
digital data and instructions.
6
3. Application for approval

3.1. The application for approval of a vehicle type with regard to the ALKS shall
be submitted by the vehicle manufacturer or by the manufacturer’s authorized
representative.
3.2. It shall be accompanied by the documents mentioned below in triplicate:
3.2.1. A description of the vehicle type with regard to the items mentioned in
paragraph 2.1.1., together with a documentation package as required in Annex
1 which gives access to the basic design of the ALKS and the means by which
it is linked to other vehicle systems or by which it directly controls output
variables. The numbers and/or symbols identifying the vehicle type shall be
specified.
3.3. A vehicle representative of the vehicle type to be approved shall be submitted
to the Technical Service conducting the approval tests.
4. Approval
4.1. If the vehicle type submitted for approval pursuant to this Regulation meets
the requirements of paragraph 5 to 9 below, approval of that vehicle shall be
granted.
4.2. An approval number shall be assigned to each type approved; its first two digits
(at present 00 corresponding to the 00 series of amendments, its original
version) shall indicate the series of amendments incorporating the most recent
major technical amendments made to the Regulation at the time of issue of the
approval. The same Contracting Party shall not assign the same number to
another vehicle type.
4.3. Notice of approval or of refusal or withdrawal of approval pursuant to this
Regulation shall be communicated to the Parties to the Agreement which apply
this Regulation by means of a form conforming to the model in Annex 1 and
documentation supplied by the applicant being in a format not exceeding A4
(210 x 297 mm), or folded to that format, and on an appropriate scale or
electronic format.
4.4. There shall be affixed, conspicuously and in a readily accessible place
specified on the approval form, to every vehicle conforming to a vehicle type
approved under this Regulation, an international approval mark conforming to
the model described in Annex 2, consisting of:
4.4.1. A circle surrounding the letter "E" followed by the distinguishing number of
the country which has granted approval;2
4.4.2. The number of this Regulation, followed by the letter "R", a dash and the
approval number to the right of the circle prescribed in paragraph 4.4.1. above.
4.5. If the vehicle conforms to a vehicle type approved under one or more other
Regulations, annexed to the Agreement, in the country which has granted
approval under this Regulation, the symbol prescribed in paragraph 4.4.1.
above need not be repeated; in such a case, the Regulation and approval
numbers and the additional symbols shall be placed in vertical columns to the
right of the symbol prescribed in paragraph 4.4.1. above.
4.6. The approval mark shall be clearly legible and be indelible.
2 The distinguishing numbers of the Contracting Parties to the 1958 Agreement are reproduced in
Annex 3 to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3), document
ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.6 -
www. unece.org/transport/standards/transport/vehicle-regulations-wp29/resolutions
7
4.7. The approval mark shall be placed close to or on the vehicle data plate.
5. System Safety and Fail-safe Response

5.1. General Requirements
The fulfilment of the provisions of this paragraph shall be demonstrated by the
manufacturer to the technical service during the inspection of the safety
approach as part of the assessment to Annex 4 (in particular for conditions not
tested under Annex 5) and according to the relevant tests in Annex 5.
5.1.1. The activated system shall perform the DDT shall manage all situations
including failures, and shall be free of unreasonable risks for the vehicle
occupants or any other road users.
The activated system shall not cause any collisions that are reasonably
foreseeable and preventable. If a collision can be safely avoided without
causing another one, it shall be avoided. When the vehicle is involved in a
detectable collision, the vehicle shall be brought to a standstill.
5.1.2. The activated system shall comply with traffic rules relating to the DDT in the
country of operation.
5.1.3. The activated system shall exercise control over systems required to support
the driver in resuming manual control at any time (e.g. demist, windscreen
wipers and lights).
5.1.4. A transition demand shall not endanger the safety of the vehicle occupants or
other road users.
5.1.5. If the driver fails to resume control of the DDT during the transition phase, the
system shall perform a minimum risk manoeuvre. During a minimum risk
manoeuvre, the system shall minimise risks to safety of the vehicle occupants
and other road users.
5.1.6. The system shall perform self-checks to detect the occurrence of failures and
to confirm system performance at all times (e.g. after vehicle start the system
has at least once detected an object at the same or a higher distance than that
declared as detection range according to paragraph 7.1.).
5.1.7. The effectiveness of the system shall not be adversely affected by magnetic or
electrical fields. This shall be demonstrated by compliance with the 05 or later
series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 10.
5.1.8. The manufacturer shall take measures to guard against reasonably foreseeable
misuse by the driver and tampering of the system.
5.1.9. When the system can no longer meet the requirements of this Regulation, it
shall not be possible to activate the system.
The manufacturer shall declare and implement a process to manage the safety
and continued compliance of the ALKS system over lifetime.
5.2. Dynamic Driving Task
5.2.1. The activated system shall keep the vehicle inside its lane of travel and ensure
that the vehicle does not cross any lane marking (outer edge of the front tyre
to outer edge of the lane marking). The system shall aim to keep the vehicle in
a stable lateral position inside the lane of travel to avoid confusing other road
users.
8
5.2.2. The activated system shall detect a vehicle driving beside as defined in
paragraph 7.1.2. and, if necessary, adjust the speed and/or the lateral position
of the vehicle within its lane as appropriate.
5.2.3. The activated system shall control the speed of the vehicle.
5.2.3.1. The maximum speed up to which the system is permitted to operate is 60 km/h.
5.2.3.2. The activated system shall adapt the vehicle speed to infrastructural and
environmental conditions (e.g. narrow curve radii, inclement weather).
5.2.3.3. The activated system shall detect the distance to the next vehicle in front as
defined in paragraph 7.1.1. and shall adapt the vehicle speed in order to avoid
collision.
While the ALKS vehicle is not at standstill, the system shall adapt the speed to
adjust the distance to a vehicle in front in the same lane to be equal or greater
than the minimum following distance.
In case the minimum time gap cannot be respected temporarily because of
other road users (e.g. vehicle is cutting in, decelerating lead vehicle, etc.), the
vehicle shall readjust the minimum following distance at the next available
opportunity without any harsh braking unless an emergency manoeuvre would
become necessary.
The minimum following distance shall be calculated using the formula:
dmin = vALKS* tfront
Where:
dmin = the minimum following distance
vALKS = the present speed of the ALKS vehicle in m/s
tfront = minimum time gap in seconds between the ALKS vehicle and a
leading vehicle in front as per the table below:
Present speed Minimum time gap Minimum following

of the ALKS vehicle distance
(km/h) (m/s) (s) (m)

7.2 2.0 1.0 2.0
10 2.78 1.1 3.1
20 5.56 1.2 6.7
30 8.33 1.3 10.8
40 11.11 1.4 15.6
50 13.89 1.5 20.8
60 16.67 1.6 26.7
For speed values not mentioned in the table, linear interpolation shall be
applied.
Notwithstanding the result of the formula above for present speeds below 2 m/s
the minimum following distance shall never be less than 2 m.
5.2.4. The activated system shall be able to bring the vehicle to a complete stop
behind a stationary vehicle, a stationary road user or a blocked lane of travel
to avoid a collision. This shall be ensured up to the maximum operational speed
of the system.
5.2.5. The activated system shall detect the risk of collision in particular with another
road user ahead or beside the vehicle, due to a decelerating lead vehicle, a
cutting in vehicle or a suddenly appearing obstacle and shall automatically
perform appropriate manoeuvres to minimize risks to safety of the vehicle
occupants and other road users.
9
For conditions not specified in paragraphs 5.2.4., 5.2.5. or its subparagraphs,

this shall be ensured at least to the level at which a competent and careful
human driver could minimize the risks. This shall be demonstrated in the
assessment carried out under Annex 4 and by taking guidance from Appendix
3 to Annex 4.
5.2.5.1. The activated system shall avoid a collision with a leading vehicle which
decelerates up to its full braking performance provided that there was no
undercut of the minimum following distance the ALKS vehicle would adjust
to a leading vehicle at the present speed due to a cut in manoeuvre of this lead
vehicle.
5.2.5.2. The activated system shall avoid a collision with a cutting in vehicle,
(a) Provided the cutting in vehicle maintains its longitudinal speed which
is lower than the longitudinal speed of the ALKS vehicle and
(b) Provided that the lateral movement of the cutting in vehicle has been
visible for a time of at least 0.72 seconds before the reference point for
TTCLaneIntrusion is reached,
(c) When the distance between the vehicle’s front and the cutting in
vehicle’s rear corresponds to a TTC calculated by the following
equation:
𝑇𝑇𝐶𝐿𝑎𝑛𝑒𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 > 𝑣𝑟𝑒𝑙/(2∙6m/s²) + 0.35𝑠
Where:
Vrel = relative velocity between both vehicles, positive for
vehicle being faster than the cutting in vehicle
TTCLaneIntrusion = The TTC value, when the outside of the tyre of the
intruding vehicle’s front wheel closest to the lane
markings crosses a line 0.3 m beyond the outside edge
of the visible lane marking to which the intruding
vehicle is being drifted.
5.2.5.3. The activated system shall avoid a collision with an unobstructed crossing
pedestrian in front of the vehicle.
In a scenario with an unobstructed pedestrian crossing with a lateral speed
component of not more than 5 km/h where the anticipated impact point is
displaced by not more than 0.2 m compared to the vehicle longitudinal center
plane, the activated ALKS shall avoid a collision up to the maximum
operational speed of the system.
5.2.5.4. It is recognised that the fulfilment of the requirement in paragraph 5.2.5. may
not be fully achieved in other conditions than those described above. However,
the system shall not deactivate or unreasonably switch the control strategy in
these other conditions. This shall be demonstrated in accordance with Annex 4
of this Regulation.
5.3. Emergency Manoeuvre (EM)
approach as part of the assessment to Annex 4 and according to the relevant
tests in Annex 5.
5.3.1. An Emergency Manoeuvre shall be carried out in case of an imminent collision
risk.
5.3.1.1. Any longitudinal deceleration demand of more than 5.0 m/s² of the system shall
be considered to be an EM.
5.3.2. This manoeuvre shall decelerate the vehicle up to its full braking performance
if necessary and/or may perform an automatic evasive manoeuvre, when
appropriate.
10
If failures are affecting the braking or steering performance of the system, the
manoeuvre shall be carried out with consideration for the remaining
performance.
During the evasive manoeuvre the ALKS vehicle shall not cross the lane
marking (outer edge of the front tyre to outer edge of the lane marking).
After the evasive manoeuvre the vehicle shall aim at resuming a stable
position.
5.3.3. An emergency manoeuvre shall not be terminated, unless the imminent
collision risk disappeared, or the driver deactivated the system.
5.3.3.1. After an emergency manoeuvre is terminated the system shall continue to
operate.
5.3.3.2. If the emergency manoeuvre results in the vehicle being at standstill, the signal
to activate the hazard warning lights shall be generated. If the vehicle
automatically drives off again, the signal to deactivate the hazard warning
lights shall be generated automatically.
5.3.4. The vehicle shall implement a logic signal indicating emergency braking as
specified in UN Regulation No. 13-H.
5.4. Transition demand and system operation during transition phase
5.4.1. The activated system shall recognise all situations in which it needs to
transition the control back to the driver.
Types of situations in which the vehicle will generate a transition demand to
the driver shall be declared by the vehicle manufacturer and included in the
documentation package required in Annex 4.
5.4.2. The initiation of the transition demand shall be such that sufficient time is
provided for a safe transition to manual driving.
5.4.2.1. In case of a planned event that would prevent the ALKS from continuing the
operation, a transition demand shall be given early enough to ensure the
minimal risk maneuver, in case the driver would not resume control, would
bring the vehicle to standstill before the planned event occurs.
5.4.2.2. In case of an unplanned event, a transition demand shall be given upon
detection.
5.4.2.3 In case of any failure affecting the operation of the system, the system shall
immediately initiate a transition demand upon detection.
5.4.3. During the transition phase the system shall continue to operate. The system
may reduce the speed of the vehicle to ensure its safe operation but shall not
bring it to standstill unless required by the situation (e.g. due to vehicles or
obstacles obstructing the path of the vehicle) or when caused by a haptic
warning according to paragraph 6.4.1 started at speeds below 20 km/h.
5.4.3.1. Once in standstill the vehicle may remain in this condition and shall generate
the signal to activate the hazard warning lights within 5 s.
5.4.3.2. During the transition phase, the transition demand shall be escalated latest after
4 s after the start of the transition demand.
5.4.4. A transition demand shall only be terminated once the system is deactivated or
a minimum risk manoeuvre has started.
5.4.4.1. In case the driver is not responding to a transition demand by deactivating the
system (either as described in paragraph 6.2.4. or 6.2.5.), a minimum risk
manoeuvre shall be started, earliest 10 s after the start of the transition demand.
11
5.4.4.1.1. Notwithstanding paragraph 5.4.4.1. a minimum risk manoeuvre may be

initiated immediately in case of a severe ALKS or severe vehicle failure.
In case of a severe ALKS or vehicle failure the ALKS may no longer be
capable of fulfilling the requirements of this Regulation, but it shall aim at
enabling a safe transition of control back to the driver.
5.4.4.1.2. The manufacturer shall declare the types of severe vehicle failures and severe
ALKS failures that will lead the ALKS to initiate a MRM immediately.
5.5. Minimum Risk Manoeuvre (MRM)
5.5.1. During the minimum risk manoeuvre the vehicle shall be slowed down inside
the lane or, in case the lane markings are not visible, remain on an appropriate
trajectory taking into account surrounding traffic and road infrastructure, with
an aim of achieving a deceleration demand not greater than 4.0 m/s².
Higher deceleration demand values are permissible for very short durations,
e.g. as haptic warning to stimulate the driver’s attention, or in case of a severe
ALKS or severe vehicle failure.
Additionally, the signal to activate the hazard warning lights shall be generated
with the start of the minimum risk manoeuvre.
5.5.2. The minimum risk manoeuvre shall bring the vehicle to standstill unless the
system is deactivated by the driver during the manoeuvre.
5.5.4. A minimum risk manoeuvre shall only be terminated once the system is
deactivated or the system has brought the vehicle to a standstill.
5.5.5. The system shall be deactivated at the end of any minimum risk manoeuvre.
The hazard warning lights shall remain activated unless deactivated manually
and the vehicle shall not move away after standstill without manual input.
5.5.6. Reactivation of the system after the end of any minimum risk manoeuvre shall
only be possible after each new engine start/run cycle.
6. Human Machine Interface/operator information

6.1. Driver Availability Recognition System
tests in Annex 5.
6.1.1. The system shall comprise a driver availability recognition system.
The driver availability recognition system shall detect if the driver is present
in a driving position, if the safety belt of the driver is fastened and if the driver
is available to take over the driving task.
6.1.2. Driver presence
A transition demand shall be initiated according to paragraph 5.4. if any of the
following conditions is met:
(a) When the driver is detected not to be in the seat for a period of more
than one second; or
(b) When the driver’s safety belt is unbuckled.
12
The second level warning of the safety-belt reminder according to UN-R16

may be used instead of an acoustic warning of the Transition Demand.
6.1.3. Driver availability
The system shall detect if the driver is available and in an appropriate driving
position to respond to a transition demand by monitoring the driver.
The manufacturer shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the technical service
the vehicle’s capability to detect that the driver is available to take over the
driving task.
6.1.3.1. Criteria for deeming driver availability
The driver shall be deemed to be unavailable unless at least two availability
criteria (e.g. input to driver-exclusive vehicle control, eye blinking, eye
closure, conscious head or body movement) have individually determined that
the driver is available in the last 30 seconds.
At any time, the system may deem the driver unavailable.
As soon as the driver is deemed to be unavailable, or fewer than two
availability criteria can be monitored, the system shall immediately provide a
distinctive warning until appropriate actions of the driver are detected or until
a transition demand is initiated. At the latest, a transition demand shall be
initiated according to paragraph 5.4. if this warning continues for 15s.
Justification for the number and combination of availability criteria, in
particular with regard to the corresponding time interval, shall be provided by
the manufacturer by documented evidence. However, the time interval
required for any availability criteria shall not exceed 30 seconds. This shall be
demonstrated by the manufacturer and assessed by the technical service
according to Annex 4.
6.1.4. "Other activities than driving" through on-board displays available upon
activation of the ALKS shall be automatically suspended (i) as soon as the
system issues a Transition Demand or (ii) as soon as the system is deactivated,
whichever comes first.
6.2. Activation, Deactivation and Driver Input
tests in Annex 5.
6.2.1. The vehicle shall be equipped with dedicated means for the driver to activate
(active mode) and deactivate (off mode) the system. When the ALKS is
activated, the means to deactivate ALKS shall be permanently visible to the
driver.
13
6.2.2. The default status of the system shall be the off mode at the initiation of each
new engine start/run cycle.
This requirement does not apply when a new engine start/run cycle is
performed automatically, e.g. by the operation of a stop/start system.
6.2.3. The system shall become active only upon a deliberate action by the driver and
if all the following conditions are met:
(a) The driver is in the driver seat and the driver’s safety belt is fastened
according to paragraphs 6.1.1. and 6.1.2.;
(b) The driver is available to take over control of the DDT according to
paragraph 6.1.3.;
(c) No failure affecting the safe operation or the functionality of the ALKS
is present;
(d) DSSAD is operational;
(e) The environmental and infrastructural conditions allow the operation;
(f) Positive confirmation of system self-check; and
(g) The vehicle is on roads where pedestrians and cyclists are prohibited
and which, by design, are equipped with a physical separation that
divides the traffic moving in opposite directions.
If any of the above conditions is no longer fulfilled, the system shall
immediately initiate a transition demand unless specified differently in this
Regulation.
6.2.4 It shall be possible to manually deactivate (off-mode) the system by an
intentional action of the driver using the same means as to activate the system,
as mentioned in paragraph 6.2.1.
The means of deactivating shall provide protection against unintentional
manual deactivation for example by requiring a single input exceeding a
certain threshold of time or a double press, or two separate but simultaneous
inputs.
Additionally, it shall be ensured the driver is in lateral control of the vehicle at
the time of the deactivation, by e.g. placing the deactivation means on the
steering control or confirming the driver is holding the steering control.
6.2.5. In addition to paragraph 6.2.4., the system shall not be deactivated by any
driver input other than those described below in paragraphs 6.2.5.1. to 6.2.5.4.
6.2.5.1. Deactivation by input to driving controls
The system shall be deactivated when at least one of the following conditions
is met:
(a) The driver overrides the system by steering while holding the steering
control and this override is not suppressed, as specified in
paragraph 6.3.; or
(b) The driver is holding the steering control and overrides the system by
braking or accelerating, as specified in paragraph 6.3.1. below.
6.2.5.2. Deactivation during an ongoing transition demand or an ongoing minimum
risk manoeuvre
In case a transition demand or a minimum risk manoeuvre is on-going, the
system shall only be deactivated:
(a) As defined in paragraph 6.2.5.1. or
(b) Upon detection that the driver has taken hold of the steering control as
a response to the transition demand or the minimum risk manoeuvre
and provided the system confirms the driver is attentive as defined in
paragraph 6.3.1.1.
14
6.2.5.3. Deactivation during an ongoing emergency manoeuvre

In case of an ongoing emergency manoeuvre, the deactivation of the system
may be delayed until the imminent collision risk disappeared.
6.2.5.4. Deactivation in case of a severe vehicle failure or a severe ALKS failure
In case of a severe vehicle failure or a severe ALKS failure the ALKS may
employ different strategies with regard to deactivation.
These different strategies shall be declared by the manufacturer and their
effectiveness shall be assessed by the Technical Service with regard to
ensuring a safe transition of control from the system to the human driver
according to Annex 4.
6.2.6. On deactivation of the system, there shall not be an automatic transition to any
function, which provides continuous longitudinal and/or lateral movement of
the vehicle (e.g. ACSF of Category B1 function).
After deactivation, Corrective Steering Function (CSF) may be active with the
aim at accustoming the driver to execute the lateral control task by gradually
reducing lateral support.
Notwithstanding both paragraphs above, any other safety system delivering
longitudinal or lateral support in imminent collision situations (e.g. Advanced
Emergency Braking System (AEBS), Electronic Stability Control (ESC),
Brake Assist System (BAS) or Emergency Steering Function (ESF)) shall not
be deactivated in case of deactivation of ALKS.
6.2.7. Any deactivation shall be indicated to the driver as defined in
paragraph 6.4.2.3.
6.3. System override
6.3.1. A driver input to the steering control shall override the lateral control function
of the system when the input exceeds a reasonable threshold designed to
prevent unintentional override.
This threshold shall include a specified force and duration and shall vary
depending on parameters that include criteria used for driver attentiveness to
be checked during the drivers input as defined in paragraph 6.3.1.1.
These thresholds and the rational for any variation shall be demonstrated to the
Technical Service during the assessment according to Annex 4.
6.3.1.1. Driver attentiveness
The system shall detect if the driver is attentive. The driver is deemed to be
attentive when at least one of the following criteria is met:
(a) Driver gaze direction is confirmed as primarily looking at the road
ahead;
(b) Driver gaze direction is being confirmed as looking at the rear-view
mirrors; or,
(c) Driver head movement is confirmed as primarily directed towards the
driving task.
The specification for confirming these or equally safe criteria must be declared
by the manufacturer and supported by documented evidence. This shall be
assessed by the technical service according to Annex 4.
6.3.2. A driver input to the braking control resulting in a higher deceleration than that
induced by the system or maintaining the vehicle in standstill by any braking
system, shall override the longitudinal control function of the system.
6.3.3. A driver input to the accelerator control may override the longitudinal control
function of the system. However, such an input shall not cause the system to
no longer meet the requirements of this Regulation.
15
6.3.4. Any driver input to the accelerator or brake control shall immediately initiate
a transition demand as specified in paragraph 5.4., when the input exceeds a
reasonable threshold designed to prevent unintentional input.
6.3.5. Notwithstanding the provisions laid down in paragraphs 6.3.1. to 6.3.3., the
effect of the driver input on any control may be reduced or suppressed by the
system in case the system has detected an imminent collision risk due to this
driver input.
6.3.6. In case of a severe vehicle failure or a severe ALKS failure the ALKS may
employ different strategies with regard to system override. These different
strategies shall be declared by the manufacturer and their effectiveness shall
be assessed by the Technical Service with regard to ensuring a safe transition
of control from the system to the human driver.
6.3.7. The fulfilment of the provisions in paragraph 6.3 and its subparagraphs shall
be demonstrated by the manufacturer to the technical service during the
inspection of the safety approach as part of the assessment to Annex 4.
6.4. Information to the driver
6.4.1. The following information shall be indicated to the driver:
(a) The system status as defined in paragraph 6.4.2.
(b) Any failure affecting the operation of the system with at least an optical
signal unless the system is deactivated (off mode),
(c) Transition demand by at least an optical and in addition an acoustic
and/or haptic warning signal.
At the latest 4 s after the initiation of the transition demand, the
transition demand shall:
(i) Contain a constant or intermittent haptic warning unless the
vehicle is at standstill; and
(ii) Be escalated and remain escalated until the transition demand
ends.
(d) Minimum risk manoeuvre by at least an optical signal and in addition
an acoustic and/or a haptic warning signal and
(e) Emergency manoeuvre by an optical signal
The optical signals above shall be adequate in size and contrast. The acoustic
signals above shall be loud and clear.
6.4.2. System status
6.4.2.1. System unavailability indication
In case activation of the system following the deliberate action of the driver is
denied by the system due to system unavailability, this shall be at least visually
displayed to the driver.
6.4.2.2. System status display when activated
Upon activation the system status (active mode) shall be displayed by a
dedicated optical signal to the driver.
The optical signal shall contain an unambiguous indication including:
(a) A steering control or a vehicle, with an additional "A" or "AUTO," or
the standardized symbols in accordance with UN Regulation No. 121,
and additionally
(b) An easily perceptible indication in the peripheral field of vision and
located near the direct line of driver’s sight to the outside in front of the
vehicle, e.g. prominent indication in the instrument cluster or on the
steering control covering part of the outer rim perimeter facing towards
the driver.
16
The optical signal shall indicate the active system state until the system is
deactivated (off mode).
The optical signal shall be constant while the system is in regular operation
and with the initiation of a transition demand at least the indication according
to (b) shall change its characteristics, e.g. to an intermittent signal or a different
colour.
When an intermittent signal is used, a low frequency shall be used in order to
not unreasonably alert the driver.
During the transition phase and minimum risk manoeuvre, the indication
according to (a) may be replaced by the instruction to take over manual control
according to paragraph 6.4.3.
6.4.2.3. System status display when deactivated
Upon deactivation when the system status changes from active mode to off
mode this shall be indicated to the driver by at least an optical warning signal.
This optical signal shall be realized by non-displaying the optical signal used
to indicate the active mode or non-displaying the instruction to take over
manual control.
Additionally, an acoustic warning signal shall be provided unless the system is
deactivated following a transition demand which contained an acoustic signal.
6.4.3. Transition Phase and Minimum Risk Manoeuvre
During the transition phase and the Minimum Risk Manoeuvre, the system
shall instruct the driver in an intuitive and unambiguous way to take over
manual control of the vehicle. The instruction shall include a pictorial
information showing hands and the steering control and may be accompanied
by additional explanatory text or warning symbols, as shown in the example
below.
6.4.3.2. With the start of the minimum risk manoeuvre, the given signal shall change
its characteristics to emphasize the urgency of an action by the driver. e.g. by
red flashing of the steering control and moving hands of the pictorial
information.
6.4.4. Where examples are given above, an adequate and equally perceptible
interface design for the optical signals may be used instead. This shall be
demonstrated by the manufacturer and shall be supported by documented
evidence. This shall be assessed by the Technical Service according to
Annex 4.
6.4.5. Prioritization of ALKS warnings
The warnings of an ALKS during a transition phase, a Minimal Risk
Manoeuvre or an Emergency Manoeuvre may be prioritized over other
warnings in the vehicle.
The prioritization of different acoustic and optical warnings during the ALKS
operation shall be declared by the manufacturer to the Technical Service during
Type Approval.
17
7. Object and Event Detection and Response (OEDR)

7.1. Sensing requirements
tests in Annex 5.
The ALKS vehicle shall be equipped with a sensing system such that, it can at
least determine the driving environment (e.g. road geometry ahead, lane
markings) and the traffic dynamics:
(a) Across the full width of its own traffic lane, the full width of the traffic
lanes immediately to its left and to its right, up to the limit of the forward
detection range;
(b) Along the full length of the vehicle and up to the limit of the lateral
detection range.
The requirements of this paragraph are without prejudice to other requirements
in this Regulation, most notably paragraph 5.1.1.
7.1.1. Forward detection range
The manufacturer shall declare the forward detection range measured from the
forward most point of the vehicle. This declared value shall be at least
46 metres.
The Technical Service shall verify that the distance at which the vehicle
sensing system detects a road user during the relevant test in Annex 5 is equal
or greater than the declared value.
7.1.2. Lateral detection range
The manufacturer shall declare the lateral detection range. The declared range
shall be sufficient to cover the full width of the lane immediately to the left and
of the lane immediately to the right of the vehicle.
The Technical Service shall verify that the vehicle sensing system detects
vehicles during the relevant test in Annex 5. This range shall be equal or greater
than the declared range.
7.1.3. The ALKS shall implement strategies to detect and compensate for
environmental conditions that reduce the detection range, e.g. prevent enabling
the system, disabling the system and transferring the control back to the driver,
reducing the speed when visibility is too low. These strategies shall be
described by the manufacturer and assessed according to Annex 4.
7.1.4. The vehicle manufacturer shall provide evidence that the effects of wear and
ageing do not reduce the performance of the sensing system below the
minimum required value specified in paragraph 7.1. over the lifetime of the
system/vehicle.
7.1.5. The fulfilment of the provisions of paragraph 7.1. and its subparagraphs shall
be demonstrated to the technical service and tested according to the relevant
tests in Annex 5.
7.1.6. A single perception malfunction without failure should not induce hazardous
event. The design strategies put in place shall be described by the vehicle
manufacturer and their safety shall be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the
technical service in accordance with Annex 4.
18
8. Data Storage System for Automated Systems

8.1. Each vehicle equipped with ALKS (the system) shall be fitted with a DSSAD
that meets the requirements specified below. The fulfilment of the provisions
of paragraph 8 shall be demonstrated by the manufacturer to the technical
service during the inspection of the safety approach as part of the assessment
to Annex 4.
This Regulation is without prejudice to national and regional laws governing
access to data, privacy and data protection.
8.2. Recorded occurrences
8.2.1. Each vehicle equipped with a DSSAD shall at least record an entry for each of
the following occurrences upon activation of the system:
(a) Activation of the system
(b) Deactivation of the system, due to:
(i) Use of dedicated means for the driver to deactivate the system;
(ii) Override on steering control;
(iii) Override by accelerator control while holding steering control;
(iv) Override by braking control while holding steering control.
(c) Transition Demand by the system, due to:
(i) Planned event;
(ii) Unplanned event;
(iii) Driver unavailability (as per para. 6.1.3);
(iv) Driver not present or unbuckled (as per para. 6.1.2.);
(v) System failure;
(vi) System override by braking input;
(vii) System override by accelerator input.
(d) Reduction or suppression of driver input;
(e) Start of Emergency Manoeuvre;
(f) End of Emergency Manoeuvre;
(g) Event Data Recorder (EDR) trigger input;
(h) Involved in a detected collision;
(i) Minimum Risk Manoeuvre engagement by the system;
(j) Severe ALKS failure;
(k) Severe vehicle failure.
8.3. Data elements
8.3.1. For each event listed in paragraph 8.2., the DSSAD shall at least record the
following data elements in a clearly identifiable way:
(a) The occurrence flag, as listed in paragraph 8.2;
(b) Reason for the occurrence, as appropriate, and listed in paragraph 8.2.;
(c) Date (Resolution: yyyy/mm/dd);
(d) Timestamp:
(i) Resolution: hh/mm/ss timezone e.g. 12:59:59 UTC;
(ii) Accuracy: +/- 1.0 s.
19
8.3.2. For each event listed in paragraph 8.2., the R15XSWIN for ALKS, or the
software versions relevant to ALKS, indicating the software that was present
at the time when the event occurred, shall be clearly identifiable.
8.3.3. A single timestamp may be allowed for multiple elements recorded
simultaneously within the timing resolution of the specific data elements. If
more than one element is recorded with the same timestamp, the information
from the individual elements shall indicate the chronological order.
8.4. Data availability
8.4.1. DSSAD data shall be available subject to requirements of national and regional
law.3
8.4.2. Once the storage limits of the DSSAD are achieved, existing data shall only be
overwritten following a first in first out procedure with the principle of
respecting the relevant requirements for data availability.
Documented evidence regarding the storage capacity shall be provided by the
vehicle manufacturer.
8.4.3. The data shall be retrievable even after an impact of a severity level set by UN
Regulations Nos. 94, 95 or 137. If the main on-board vehicle power supply is
not available, it shall still be possible to retrieve all data recorded on the
DSSAD, as required by national and regional law.
8.4.4. Data stored in the DSSAD shall be easily readable in a standardized way via
the use of an electronic communication interface, at least through the standard
interface (OBD port).
8.4.5. Instructions from the manufacturer shall be provided on how to access the data.
8.5. Protection against manipulation.
8.5.1. It shall be ensured that there is adequate protection against manipulation (e.g.
data erasure) of stored data such as anti-tampering design.
8.6. Availability of DSSAD operation
8.6.1. DSSAD shall be able to communicate with the system to inform that the
DSSAD is operational.
9. Cybersecurity and Software-Updates

9.1. The effectiveness of the system shall not be adversely affected by cyber-
attacks, cyber threats and vulnerabilities. The effectiveness of the security
measures shall be demonstrated by compliance with UN Regulation No. 15Z.
9.2. If the system permits software updates, the effectiveness of the software update
procedures and processes shall be demonstrated by compliance with
UN Regulation No. 15Y.
9.3. Requirements for software identification
9.3.1. For the purpose of ensuring the software of the System can be identified, an
R15XSWIN may be implemented by the vehicle manufacturer. If R 15XSWIN is
not implemented, an alternative software identification system (i.e. software
version) shall be implemented.
9.3.2. If the manufacturer implements an R15XWIN the following shall apply:
9.3.2.1. The vehicle manufacturer shall have a valid approval according to UN
Regulation No. 15Y (Software Update Regulation).
3 Note: based on a recent quantitative study of a Contracting Party, GRVA is considering that the text
specifies several timestamps specifications of 2500 timestamps to correspond with a period of 6
months of use.
20
9.3.2.2. The vehicle manufacturer shall provide the following information in the
communication form of this Regulation:
(a) The R15XSWIN
(b) How to read the R15XSWIN or software version(s) in case the
R15XSWIN is not held on the vehicle
9.3.2.3. The vehicle manufacturer may provide in the communication form of this
Regulation a list of the relevant parameters that will allow the identification of
those vehicles that can be updated with the software represented by the
R15XSWIN. The information provided shall be declared by the vehicle
manufacturer and may not be verified by an Approval Authority.
9.3.3. The vehicle manufacturer may obtain a new vehicle approval for the purpose
of differentiating software versions intended to be used on vehicles already
registered in the market from the software versions that are used on new
vehicles. This may cover the situations where type approval regulations are
updated or hardware changes are made to vehicles in series production. In
agreement with the testing agency, duplication of tests shall be avoided where
possible.
10. Modification of vehicle type and extension of

approval
10.1. Every modification to an existing vehicle type shall be notified to the Type
Approval Authority which approved the vehicle type.
The Authority shall then either:
(a) Decide, in consultation with the manufacturer, that a new type-approval
is to be granted; or
(b) Apply the procedure contained in paragraph 10.1.1. (Revision) and, if
applicable, the procedure contained in paragraph 10.1.2. (Extension).
10.1.1. Revision
When particulars recorded in the information documents have changed and the
Type Approval Authority considers that the modifications made are unlikely
to have appreciable adverse effects and that in any case the foot controls still
meet the requirements, the modification shall be designated a "revision".
In such a case, the Type Approval Authority shall issue the revised pages of
the information documents as necessary, marking each revised page to show
clearly the nature of the modification and the date of re-issue.
A consolidated, updated version of the information documents, accompanied
by a detailed description of the modification, shall be deemed to meet this
requirement.
10.1.2. Extension
The modification shall be designated an "extension" if, in addition to the
change of the particulars recorded in the information documents,
(a) Further inspections or tests are required; or
(b) Any information on the communication document (with the exception
of its attachments) has changed; or
(c) Approval to a later series of amendments is requested after its entry into
force.
10.2. Confirmation or refusal of approval, specifying the alteration, shall be
communicated by the procedure specified in paragraph 4.3. above to the
Contracting Parties to the Agreement applying this Regulation. In addition, the
21
index to the information documents and to the test reports, attached to the
communication document of Annex 1, shall be amended accordingly to show
the date of the most recent revision or extension.
10.3. The competent authority issuing the extension of approval shall assign a serial
number to each communication form drawn up for such an extension.
11. Conformity of production

11.1. Procedures concerning conformity of production shall comply with those set
out in the 1958 Agreement, Schedule 1 (E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3) and meet
the following requirements:
11.2. A vehicle approved pursuant to this Regulation shall be so manufactured as to
conform to the type approved by meeting the requirements of this regulation;
11.3. The Type Approval Authority which has granted approval may at any time
verify the conformity of control methods applicable to each production unit.
The normal frequency of such inspections shall be once every two years.
12. Penalties for non-conformity of production

12.1. The approval granted in respect of a vehicle type pursuant to this Regulation
may be withdrawn if the requirements laid down in paragraph 8, above are not
complied with.
12.2. If a Contracting Party withdraws an approval it had previously granted, it shall
forthwith so notify the other Contracting Parties applying this Regulation by
sending them a communication form conforming to the model in Annex 1 to
this Regulation.
13. Production definitively discontinued

13.1. If the holder of the approval completely ceases to manufacture a type of vehicle
approved in accordance with this Regulation, he shall so inform the Type
Approval Authority which granted the approval, which in turn shall forthwith
inform the other Contracting Parties to the Agreement applying this Regulation
by means of a communication form conforming to the model in Annex 1 to
this Regulation.
13.2. The production is not considered definitely discontinued if the vehicle
manufacturer intends to obtain further approvals for software updates for
vehicles already registered in the market.
14. Names and addresses of technical series responsible

for conducting approval tests and of Type Approval
Authorities
The Contracting Parties to the Agreement applying this Regulation shall
communicate to the United Nations Secretariat4 the names and addresses of the
Technical Services responsible for conducting approval tests and of the Type
Approval Authorities which grant approval and to which forms certifying
approval or extension or refusal or withdrawal of approval are to be sent.
4 Through the online platform (“/343 Application”) provided by UNECE and dedicated to the exchange
of such information: https://unece.org/data-sharing
22
Annex 1
Annex 1
Communication
(Maximum format: A4 (210 x 297 mm)
1 issued by: Name of administration:
......................................
......................................
......................................
1
Concerning:2 Approval granted

Approval extended
Approval refused
Approval withdrawn
Production definitively discontinued
of a vehicle type with regard to steering equipment pursuant to UN Regulation No. 157
Approval No. ..................
Reason for extension or revision: ............................................................................................
1. Trade name or mark of vehicle ....................................................................................
2. Vehicle type .................................................................................................................
3. Manufacturer's name and address ................................................................................
4. If applicable, name and address of manufacturer's representative ...............................
5. General construction characteristics of the vehicle:
5.1. Photographs and/or drawings of a representative vehicle: ...........................................
6. Description and/or drawing of the ALKS including:
6.1. Specified maximum speed of the ALKS declared by the manufacturer: .....................
6.2 Sensing system (incl. components): .............................................................................
6.3. Installation of the ALKS sensing system: ....................................................................
6.4. Software Identification of the ALKS (if applicable): ...................................................
7. Written description and/or drawing of the ALKS Human Machine Interface including:
7.1. Methods to detect driver availability ............................................................................
7.2. Means to activate, deactivate and override the system ................................................
7.3. Methods to determine driver attentiveness ...................................................................
7.4. Any system limitations due to environmental or road conditions .................................
8. Written description and/or drawing of the information given to the driver including:
8.1. System status: ..............................................................................................................
8.2. Transition demand: ......................................................................................................
1 Distinguishing number of the country which has granted/extended/refused/withdrawn approval (see

approval provisions in UN Regulation No. 157).
2 Strike out what does not apply.
23
Annex 1
8.3. Minimum Risk Manoeuvre: ........................................................................................

8.4. Emergency Manoeuvre: .............................................................................................
9. Data Storage System for Automated Driving (DSSAD):
9.1. DSSAD performance verified after the tests performed according to Annex 5: yes/no
9.2. DSSAD documentation concerning data retrievability, data integrity self-check and
protection against manipulation of stored data verified: yes/no
10. Cyber Security and Software updates
10.1. Cyber Security Type Approval Number (if applicable): ..............................................
10.2. Software Update Type approval number (if applicable): .............................................
11. Special requirements to be applied to the safety aspects of electronic control systems
(Annex 4)
11.1. Manufacturers document reference for Annex 4 (including version number): .............
11.2. Information document form (Appendix 2 of Annex 4) .................................................
12. Technical Service responsible for conducting approval tests .......................................
12.1. Date of report issued by that service .............................................................................
12.2. (Reference) Number of the report issued by that service ..............................................
13. Approval granted/extended/revised/refused/withdrawn 2
14. Position of approval mark on vehicle............................................................................
15. Place ..............................................................................................................................
16. Date ...............................................................................................................................
17. Signature .......................................................................................................................
18. Annexed to this communication is a list of documents in the approval file deposited
at the administration services having delivered the approval and which can be obtained
upon request.
Additional information
19. R15XSWIN: ...................................................................................................................
19.1. Information on how to read the R15XSWIN or software version(s) in case the
R15XSWIN is not held on the vehicle: ..........................................................................
19.2. If applicable, list the relevant parameters that will allow the identification of those
vehicles that can be updated with the software represented by the R 15XSWIN under
item 19.1.: ....................................................................................................................
24
Annex 1 – Appendix
Appendix
Addendum to Type approval Communication No …

concerning the type approval of a vehicle type with regard to
ALKS pursuant to Regulation No. 157
Additional information
Contracting Party regions where the vehicle manufacturer has declared that the ALKS had
been assessed to comply with local traffic rules:
Country Assessed Comments on any restrictions
E 1 Germany Yes/No
E 2 France
E 3 Italy
E 4 Netherlands
E 5 Sweden
E 6 Belgium
E 7 Hungary
E 8 Czech Republic
E 9 Spain
E 10 Serbia
E 11 United Kingdom
E 12 Austria
E 13 Luxembourg
E 14 Switzerland
E 16 Norway
E 17 Finland
E 18 Denmark
E 19 Romania
E 20 Poland
E 21 Portugal
E 22 Russian Federation
E 23 Greece
E 24 Ireland
E 25 Croatia
E 26 Slovenia
E 27 Slovakia
E 28 Belarus
25
Annex 1 - Appendix
Country Assessed Comments on any restrictions
E 29 Estonia
E 30 Republic of Moldova
E 31 Bosnia and
Herzegovina
E 32 Latvia
E 34 Bulgaria
E 35 Kazakhstan
E 36 Lithuania
E 37 Turkey
E 39 Azerbaijan
E 40 North Macedonia
E 43 Japan
E 45 Australia
E 46 Ukraine
E 47 South Africa
E 48 New Zealand
E 49 Cyprus
E 50 Malta
E 51 Republic of Korea
E 52 Malaysia
E 53 Thailand
E 54 Albania
E 55 Armenia
E 56 Montenegro
E 57 San Marino
E 58 Tunisia
E 60 Georgia
E 62 Egypt
E 63 Nigeria
E 64 Pakistan
*
* The list of Contracting Parties applying UN Regulation No. 157 is available online:
https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XI-B-16-
157&chapter=11&clang=_en
26
ECE/TRANS/[xxx]
Annex 2
Annex 2
Arrangements of approval marks

Model A
(See paragraph 4.4. of this Regulation)
157R - 002439
a = 8 mm min
The above approval mark affixed to a vehicle shows that the vehicle type concerned has, with regard
to ALKS, been approved in the Netherlands (E 4) pursuant to UN Regulation No. 157 under approval No.
002439. The approval number indicates that the approval was granted in accordance with the requirements
of UN Regulation No. 157 in its original version.
Model B
(See paragraph 4.5. of this Regulation)
157 002439
31 021628
a = 8 mm min
The above approval mark affixed to a vehicle shows that the vehicle type concerned has been
approved in the Netherlands (E 4) pursuant to Regulations Nos. 157 and 31.1 The approval numbers
indicate that, at the dates when the respective approvals were given, UN Regulation No. 157 was in its
original version and UN Regulation No. 31 included the 02 series of amendments.
1 The second number is given merely as an example.
27
ECE/TRANS/[xxx]
Annex 3
Annex 3
(Reserved)
28
Annex 4
Annex 4
Special requirements to be applied to the functional and

operational safety aspects of Automated Lane Keeping
Systems (ALKS)
1. General
This annex is intended to ensure that an acceptable thorough consideration of
functional and operational safety for the automated system that provides the
function(s) regulated by the ALKS Regulation has been performed by the
manufacturer during the design and development processes and will continue
to be done throughout the vehicle type lifecycle (design, development,
production, field operation, decommissioning).
It covers the documentation which must be disclosed by the manufacturer to
the type-approval authority or the technical Service acting on its behalf
(hereafter referred as type-approval authority), for type approval purposes.
This documentation shall demonstrate that automated lane keeping system
meets the performance requirements specified in this UN Regulation, that it is
designed and developed to operate in such a way that it is free of unreasonable
safety risks to the driver, passengers and other road users.
The type approval authority granting the approval shall verify through targeted
spot checks and tests that the argumentation provided by the documentation is
strong enough and that the design and processes described in documentation
are actually implemented by the manufacturer.
While based on the provided documentation, evidence and process
audits/product assessments carried out to the satisfaction of the type approval
authority concerning this Regulation, the residual level of risk of the assessed
automated lane keeping system is deemed to be acceptable for the entry into
service of the vehicle type, the overall vehicle safety during the automated
lane keeping system lifetime in accordance with the requirements of this
regulation remains the responsibility of the manufacturer requesting the type-
approval.
2. Definitions
For the purposes of this annex,
2.1. "The system" means a "Higher-Level Electronic Control" system and its
electronic control system(s) that provide the automated driving function. This
also includes any transmission links to or from other systems that are outside
the scope of this Regulation that acts on the automated lane keeping function.
2.2. "Safety Concept" is a description of the measures designed into the system, for
example within the electronic units, so that the vehicle operates in such a way
that it is free of unreasonable safety risks to the driver, passengers and other
road users under faults and non-fault conditions. The possibility of a fallback
to partial operation or even to a back-up system for vital vehicle functions shall
be a part of the safety concept.
2.3. "Electronic control system" means a combination of units, designed to co-
operate in the production of the stated automated lane keeping function by
electronic data processing. Such systems, commonly controlled by software,
are built from discrete functional components such as sensors, electronic
29
Annex 4
control units and actuators and connected by transmission links. They may
include mechanical, electro-pneumatic or electro-hydraulic elements.
2.4. "Higher-Level Electronic Control" systems are those which employ processing
and/or sensing provisions to realize the dynamic driving task.
2.5. "Units" are the smallest divisions of system components which will be
considered in this annex, since these combinations of components will be
treated as single entities for purposes of identification, analysis or replacement.
2.6. "Transmission links" are the means used for inter-connecting distributed units
for the purpose of conveying signals, operating data or an energy supply. This
equipment is generally electrical but may, in some part, be mechanical,
pneumatic or hydraulic.
2.7. "Range of control" refers to an output variable and defines the range over
which the system is likely to exercise control.
2.8. "Boundary of functional operation" defines the boundaries of the external
physical limits within which the system is able to perform the dynamic driving
tasks (i.e. including the transition demands and minimum risk manoeuvres).
2.9. "Operational Design Domain (ODD)" of the automated lane keeping system
defines the specific operating conditions (e.g. environmental, geographic,
time-of-day, traffic, infrastructure, speed range, weather and other conditions)
within the boundaries fixed by this regulation under which the automated lane
keeping system is designed to operate without any intervention by the driver.
2.10. "Automated Driving Function" means a function of "The System" that is
capable of performing the dynamic driving task of the vehicle.
2.11. "Control strategy" means a strategy to ensure robust and safe operation of the
function(s) of "The System" in response to a specific set of ambient and/or
operating conditions (such as road surface condition, traffic intensity and other
road users, adverse weather conditions, etc.). This may include the automatic
deactivation of a function or temporary performance restrictions (e.g. a
reduction in the maximum operating speed, etc.).
2.12. "Functional safety": absence of unreasonable risks under the occurrence of
hazards caused by a malfunctioning behaviour of electric/electronic systems
(safety hazards resulting from system faults).
2.13. "Fault": abnormal condition that can cause an element (system, component,
software) or an item (system or combination of systems that implement a
function of a vehicles) to fail.
2.14. "Failure" means the termination of an intended behaviour of an element or an
item.
2.15. "Operational safety" means the absence of unreasonable risk under the
occurrence of hazards resulting from functional insufficiencies of the intended
functionality (e.g. false/missed detection), operational disturbances (e.g.
environmental conditions like fog, rain, shadows, sunlight, infrastructure) or
by reasonably foreseeable misuse/errors by the driver, passengers and other
road users (safety hazards — without system faults).
2.16. "Unreasonable risk" means the overall level of risk for the driver, vehicle
occupants and other road users which is increased compared to a competently
and carefully driven manual vehicle.
30
Annex 4
3. Documentation
3.1. Requirements
The manufacturer shall provide a documentation package which gives access
to the basic design of "The System" and the means by which it is linked to
other vehicle systems or by which it directly controls output variables.
The function(s) of "The System", including the control strategies, and the
safety concept, as laid down by the manufacturer, shall be explained.
Documentation shall be brief, yet provide evidence that the design and
development has had the benefit of expertise from all the system fields which
are involved.
For periodic technical inspections, the documentation shall describe how the
current operational status of "The System" can be checked.
Information about how the software version(s) and the failure warning signal
status can be readable in a standardized way via the use of an electronic
communication interface, at least be the standard interface (OBD port).
The Type-approval authority shall assess the documentation package to show
that "The System":
(a) Is designed and was developed to operate in such a way that it is free
from unreasonable risks for the driver, passengers and other road users
within the declared ODD and boundaries;
(b) Respects, under the performance requirements specified elsewhere in
this UN Regulation;
(c) Was developed according to the development process/method declared
by the manufacturer and that this includes at least the steps listed in
paragraph 3.4.4.
3.1.1. Documentation shall be made available in three parts:
(a) Application for type approval: The information document which is
submitted to the type approval authority at the time of type approval
application shall contain brief information on the items listed in
Appendix 2. It will become part of the approval.
(b) The formal documentation package for the approval, containing the
material listed in this paragraph 3. (with the exception of that of
paragraph 3.4.4.) which shall be supplied to the Type Approval
Authority for the purpose of conducting the product assessment /
process audit. This documentation package shall be used by the Type
Approval Authority as the basic reference for the verification process
set out in paragraph 4. of this annex. The Type Approval Authority shall
ensure that this documentation package remains available for a period
determined of at least 10 years counted from the time when production
of the vehicle type is definitely discontinued.
(c) Additional confidential material and analysis data (intellectual
property) of paragraph 3.4.4. which shall be retained by the
manufacturer, but made open for inspection (e.g. on-site in the
engineering facilities of the manufacturer) at the time of the product
assessment / process audit. The manufacturer shall ensure that this
material and analysis data remains available for a period of 10 years
counted from the time when production of the vehicle type is definitely
discontinued.
31
Annex 4
3.2. Description of the functions of "The System" including control strategies

A description shall be provided which gives a simple explanation of all the
functions including control strategies of "The System" and the methods
employed to perform the dynamic driving tasks within the ODD and the
boundaries under which the automated lane keeping system is designed to
operate, including a statement of the mechanism(s) by which control is
exercised. The manufacturer shall describe the interactions expected between
the system and the driver, vehicle occupants and other road users as well as
Human-Machine-Interface (HMI).
Any enabled or disabled automated driving functions for which the hardware
and software are present in the vehicle at the time of production, shall be
declared and are subject to the requirements of this annex, prior to their use in
the vehicle. The manufacturer shall also document the data processing in case
of continuous learning algorithms are implemented.
3.2.1. A list of all input and sensed variables shall be provided and the working range
of these defined, along with a description of how each variable affects system
behaviour.
3.2.2. A list of all output variables which are controlled by "The System" shall be
provided and an explanation given, in each case, of whether the control is direct
or via another vehicle system. The range of control (paragraph 2.7.) exercised
on each such variable shall be defined.
3.2.3. Limits defining the boundaries of functional operation including ODD-limits
shall be stated where appropriate to automated lane keeping system
performance.
3.2.4. Interaction concept with the driver when ODD limits are reached shall be
explained including the list of types of situations in which the system will
generate a transition demand to the driver.
3.2.5. Information shall be provided about the means to activate, override or
deactivate the system including the strategy how the system is protected
against unintentional deactivation. This shall also include information about
how the system detects that the driver is available to take over driving control
along with specification and documented evidence of the used parameter to
identify driver attentiveness as well as the influence on the steering thresholds.
3.3. System layout and schematics
3.3.1. Inventory of components.
A list shall be provided, collating all the units of "The System" and mentioning
the other vehicle systems which are needed to achieve the control function in
question.
An outline schematic showing these units in combination, shall be provided
with both the equipment distribution and the interconnections made clear.
This outline shall include:
(a) Perception and objects detection including mapping and positioning
(b) Characterization of Decision-making
(c) Remote supervision and remote monitoring by a remote supervision
centre (if applicable).
(d) The data storage system (DSSAD).
3.3.2. Functions of the units
The function of each unit of "The System" shall be outlined and the signals
linking it with other units or with other vehicle systems shall be shown. This
32
Annex 4
may be provided by a labelled block diagram or other schematic, or by a

description aided by such a diagram.
3.3.3. Interconnections within "The System" shall be shown by a circuit diagram for
the electric transmission links, by a piping diagram for pneumatic or hydraulic
transmission equipment and by a simplified diagrammatic layout for
mechanical linkages. The transmission links both to and from other systems
shall also be shown.
3.3.4. There shall be a clear correspondence between transmission links and the
signals carried between Units. Priorities of signals on multiplexed data paths
shall be stated wherever priority may be an issue affecting performance or
safety.
3.3.5. Identification of units
Each unit shall be clearly and unambiguously identifiable (e.g. by marking for
hardware, and by marking or software output for software content) to provide
corresponding hardware and documentation association. Where software
version can be changed without requiring replacement of the marking or
component, the software identification must be by software output only.
Where functions are combined within a single unit or indeed within a single
computer, but shown in multiple blocks in the block diagram for clarity and
ease of explanation, only a single hardware identification marking shall be
used. The manufacturer shall, by the use of this identification, affirm that the
equipment supplied conforms to the corresponding document.
3.3.5.1. The identification defines the hardware and software version and, where the
latter changes such as to alter the function of the unit as far as this Regulation
is concerned, this identification shall also be changed.
3.3.6. Installation of sensing system components
The manufacturer shall provide information regarding the installation options
that will be employed for the individual components that comprise the sensing
system. These options shall include, but are not limited to, the location of the
component in/on the vehicle, the material(s) surrounding the component, the
dimensioning and geometry of the material surrounding the component, and
the surface finish of the materials surrounding the component, once installed
in the vehicle. The information shall also include installation specifications
that are critical to the system’s performance, e.g. tolerances on installation
angle.
Changes to the individual components of the sensing system, or the installation
options, shall be notified to the Type Approval Authority and be subject to
further assessment.
3.4. Safety concept of the manufacturer
3.4.1. The manufacturer shall provide a statement which affirms that the "The
System" is free from unreasonable risks for the driver, passengers and other
road users.
3.4.2. In respect of software employed in "The System", the outline architecture shall
be explained and the design methods and tools used shall be identified (see
3.5.1). The manufacturer shall show evidence of the means by which they
determined the realization of the system logic, during the design and
development process.
3.4.3. The manufacturer shall provide the Type Approval Authority with an
explanation of the design provisions built into "The System" so as to ensure
functional and operational safety. Possible design provisions in "The System"
are for example:
(a) Fall-back to operation using a partial system.
33
Annex 4
(b) Redundancy with a separate system.

(c) Removal of the automated driving function(s).
3.4.3.1. If the chosen provision selects a partial performance mode of operation under
certain fault conditions (e.g. in case of severe failures), then these conditions
shall be stated (e.g. type of severe failure) and the resulting limits of
effectiveness defined (e.g. initiation of a minimum risk manoeuvre
immediately) as well as the warning strategy to the driver.
3.4.3.2. If the chosen provision selects a second (back-up) means to realise the
performance of the dynamic driving task, the principles of the change-over
mechanism, the logic and level of redundancy and any built in back-up
checking features shall be explained and the resulting limits of back-up
effectiveness defined.
3.4.3.3. If the chosen provision selects the removal of the automated driving function,
this shall be done in compliance with the relevant provisions of this regulation.
All the corresponding output control signals associated with this function shall
be inhibited.
3.4.4. The documentation shall be supported, by an analysis which shows, in overall
terms, how the system will behave to mitigate or avoid hazards which can have
a bearing on the safety of the driver, passengers and other road users.
The chosen analytical approach(es) shall be established and maintained by the
manufacturer and shall be made open for inspection by the Type Approval
Authority at the time of the type approval.
The Type Approval Authority shall perform an assessment of the application
of the analytical approach(es):
(a) Inspection of the safety approach at the concept (vehicle) level.
This approach shall be based on a Hazard / Risk analysis appropriate to
system safety.
(b) Inspection of the safety approach at the system level including a top
down (from possible hazard to design) and bottom up approach (from
design to possible hazards). The safety approach may be based on a
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), a Fault Tree Analysis
(FTA) and a System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) or any similar
process appropriate to system functional and operational safety.
(c) Inspection of the validation/verification plans and results including
appropriate acceptance criteria. This shall include validation testing
appropriate for validation, for example, Hardware in the Loop (HIL)
testing, vehicle on-road operational testing, testing with real end users,
or any other testing appropriate for validation/verification. Results of
validation and verification may be assessed by analysing coverage of
the different tests and setting coverage minimal thresholds for various
metrics.
The inspection shall confirm that at least each of the following items is covered
where applicable under (a)-(c):
(i) Issues linked to interactions with other vehicle systems (e.g. braking,
steering);
(ii) Failures of the automated lane keeping system and system risk
mitigation reactions;
(iii) Situations within the ODD when a system may create unreasonable
safety risks for the driver, passengers and other road users due to
operational disturbances (e.g. lack of or wrong comprehension of the
vehicle environment, lack of understanding of the reaction from the
34
Annex 4
driver, passenger or other road users, inadequate control, challenging

scenarios)
(iv) Identification of the relevant scenarios within the boundary conditions
and management method used to select scenarios and validation tool
chosen.
(v) Decision making process resulting in the performance of the dynamic
driving tasks (e.g. emergency manoeuvres), for the interaction with
other road users and in compliance with traffic rules
(vi) Reasonably foreseeable misuse by the driver (e.g. driver availability
recognition system and an explanation on how the availability criteria
were established), mistakes or misunderstanding by the driver (e.g.
unintentional override) and intentional tampering of the system.
(viii) Cyber-attacks having an impact on the safety of the vehicle (can be done
through the analysis done under the UN Regulation No 155 on Cyber
Security and Cyber Security Management System).
The assessment by the approval authority shall consist of spot checks of
selected hazards (or cyber threats) to establish that argumentation supporting
the safety concept is understandable and logical and implemented in the
different functions of the systems. The assessment shall also check that
validation plans are robust enough to demonstrate safety (e.g. reasonable
coverage of chosen scenarios testing by the validation tool chosen) and have
been completed.
It shall demonstrate that the vehicle is free from unreasonable risks for the
driver; vehicle occupants and other road users in the operational design
domain, i.e. through:
(a) An overall validation target (i.e., validation acceptance criteria)
supported by validation results, demonstrating that the entry into
service of the automated lane keeping system will overall not increase
the level of risk for the driver, vehicle occupants, and other road users
compared to a manually driven vehicles; and
(b) A scenario specific approach showing that the system will overall not
increase the level of risk for the driver, passengers and other road users
compared to a manually driven vehicles for each of the safety relevant
scenarios; and
The Type Approval Authority shall perform or shall require performing tests
as specified in paragraph 4. to verify the safety concept.
3.4.4.1. This documentation shall itemize the parameters being monitored and shall set
out, for each failure condition of the type defined in paragraph 3.4.4. of this
annex, the warning signal to be given to the driver/vehicle occupants/other
road users and/or to service/technical inspection personnel.
3.4.4.2. This documentation shall also describe the measures in place to ensure the
"The System" is free from unreasonable risks for the driver, vehicle occupants,
and other road users when the performance of "The System" is affected by
environmental conditions e.g. climatic, temperature, dust ingress, water
ingress, ice packing.
3.5. Safety management system (Process Audit)
3.5.1. In respect of software and hardware employed in "The System", the
manufacturer shall demonstrate to the type approval authority in terms of a
safety management system that effective processes, methodologies and tools
are in place, up to date and being followed within the organization to manage
the safety and continued compliance throughout the product lifecycle (design,
35
Annex 4
development, production, operation including respect of traffic rules, and

decommissioning).
3.5.2. The design and development process shall be established including safety
management system, requirements management, requirements’
implementation, testing, failure tracking, remedy and release
3.5.3. The manufacturer shall institute and maintain effective communication
channels between manufacturer departments responsible for
functional/operational safety, cybersecurity and any other relevant disciplines
related to the achievement of vehicle safety.
3.5.4. The manufacturer shall have processes to monitor safety-relevant incidents/
crashes/collisions caused by the engaged automated lane keeping system and
a process to manage potential safety-relevant gaps post-registration (closed
loop of field monitoring) and to update the vehicles. They shall report critical
incidents (e.g. collision with another road users and potential safety-relevant
gaps) to the type-approval authorities when critical incidents.
3.5.5. The manufacturer shall demonstrate that periodic independent internal process
audits are carried out to ensure that the processes established in accordance
with paragraphs 3.5.1 to 3.5.4. are implemented consistently.
3.5.6. Manufacturers shall put in place suitable arrangements (e.g. contractual
arrangements, clear interfaces, quality management system) with suppliers to
ensure that the supplier safety management system comply with the
requirements of paragraphs 3.5.1. (except for vehicle related aspects like
"operation" and "decommissioning"), 3.5.2, 3.5.3 and 3.5.5.
4. Verification and tests

4.1. The functional operation of "The System", as laid out in the documents
required in paragraph 3., shall be tested as follows:
4.1.1. Verification of the function of "The System"
The Type approval authority shall verify "The System" under non-failure
conditions by testing on a track a number of selected functions from those
described by the manufacturer in paragraph 3.2. above, and by checking the
overall behaviour of the system in real driving conditions including the
compliance with traffic rules.
These tests shall include scenarios whereby the system is overridden by the
driver.
Tests according to this Annex shall take into account tests already conducted
in Annex 5 of this Regulation.
4.1.1.1. The verification results shall correspond with the description, including the
control strategies, provided by the manufacturer in paragraph 3.2. and shall
comply with the requirements of this regulation.
4.1.2. Verification of the safety concept of paragraph 3.4.
The reaction of "The System" shall be checked under the influence of a faults
in any individual unit by applying corresponding output signals to electrical
units or mechanical elements in order to simulate the effects of internal failure
within the unit. The Type approval authority shall conduct this check for at
least one individual unit, but shall not check the reaction of "The System" to
multiple simultaneous failures of individual units.
The Type Approval Authority shall verify that these tests include aspects that
may have an impact on vehicle controllability and user information (HMI
aspects e.g. transition scenarios).
36
Annex 4
4.1.2.1. The Type Approval Authorities shall also check a number of scenarios that are
critical for the Object and Event Detection and Response (OEDR) and
characterization of the decision-making and HMI functions of the system (e.g.
object difficult to detect, when the system reaches the ODD boundaries, traffic
disturbance scenarios) as defined in the regulation.
4.1.2.2. The verification results shall correspond with the documented summary of the
hazard analysis, to a level of overall effect such that the safety concept and
execution are confirmed as being adequate and in compliance with the
requirements of this regulation.
4.2. Simulation tool and mathematical models for verification of the safety concept
may be used in accordance with Schedule 8 of Revision 3 of the 1958
Agreement, in particular for scenarios that are difficult on a test track or in real
driving conditions. Manufacturers shall demonstrate the scope of the
simulation tool, its validity for the scenario concerned as well as the validation
performed for the simulation tool chain (correlation of the outcome with
physical tests).
5. Reporting
Reporting of the assessment shall be performed in such a manner that allows
traceability, e.g. versions of documents inspected are coded and listed in the
records of the Technical Service.
An example of a possible layout for the assessment form from the Technical
Service to the Type Approval Authority is given in Appendix 1 to this Annex.
The listed items in this Appendix are outlined as minimum set of items which
need to be covered.
6. Communication to other Type Approval

Authorities (Appendix 2) containing:
(a) Description of the ODD and the high-level functional architecture
focusing on the functions available to the driver, vehicle occupants and
other road users.
(b) Test results during the verification process by the type approval
authorities.
7. Competence of the auditors/assessors

The assessments under this Annex shall only be conducted by
auditors/assessors with the technical and administrative knowledge necessary
for such purposes. They shall in particular be competent as auditor/assessor for
ISO 26262-2018 (Functional Safety - Road Vehicles), and ISO/PAS 21448
(Safety of the Intended Functionality of road vehicles); and shall be able to
make the necessary link with cybersecurity aspects in accordance with UN
Regulation No 155 and ISO/SAE 21434). This competence should be
demonstrated by appropriate qualifications or other equivalent training
records.
37
Annex 4 - Appendix 1
Model assessment form for Automated Lane Keeping System
Test report No: ......................................

1. Identification
1.1. Make: ............................................................................................................................
1.2. Vehicle Type: ................................................................................................................
1.3. Means of system identification on the vehicle: .............................................................
1.4. Location of that marking:..............................................................................................

1.5. Manufacturer’s name and address:................................................................................
1.6. If applicable, name and address of manufacturer’s representative:...............................
1.7. Manufacturer’s formal documentation package:

Documentation reference No: ...............................
Date of original issue: ...........................................
Date of latest update: ............................................
2. Test vehicle(s)/system(s) description
2.1. General description: ......................................................................................................
2.2. Description of all the control functions of "The System", and methods of operation: ..
2.3. Description of the components and diagrams of the interconnections within "The
System":
2.4. Description of all the control functions of "The System", and methods of operation: ..
2.5. Description of the components and diagrams of the interconnections within "The
System": ........................................................................................................................
3. Manufacturer’s safety concept
3.1. Description of signal flow and operating data and their priorities: ...............................
3.2. Manufacturer’s declaration:
The manufacturer(s) ............................................................. affirm(s) that the "The

System" is free from unreasonable risks for the driver, vehicle occupants and other
road users.
3.3. Software outline architecture and the design methods and tools used: .........................
3.4. Explanation of the safety concept of "The System": .....................................................

3.5. Documented analyses of the behaviour of "The System" under individual hazard or
fault conditions: ............................................................................................................
3.6. Description of the measures in place for environmental conditions: ............................
3.7. Provisions for the periodic technical inspection of "The System": ...............................
3.8. Results of "The System" verification test, as per para. 4.1.1. of Annex 4 to
UN Regulation No. 157: ...............................................................................................
38
3.9. Results of safety concept verification test, as per para. 4.1.2. of Annex 4 to
UN Regulation No. 157: ...............................................................................................
3.10. Date of test(s): ...............................................................................................................
3.11. This test(s) has been carried out and the results reported in accordance with ….. to
UN Regulation No. 157 as last amended by the ..... series of amendments.
Technical Service carrying out the test

Signed: ....................................... Date: ........................................
3.12. Comments: ....................................................................................................................
39
Information document form for automated lane keeping

systems to be provided by the manufacturer for the approval
1. System description Automated Lane Keeping System
1.1. Operational Design Domain (Speed, road type, country, Environment, Road
conditions, etc)/ Boundary conditions/ Main conditions for Minimum risk
manoeuvres and transition demands .............................................................................
1.2. Basic Performance (e.g. Object and Event Detection and Response (OEDR) …) ........
1.3. The means to activate, override or deactivate the system. ............................................
2. Description of the functions of "The System" including control strategies
2.1. Main automated Driving Functions (functional architecture, environmental

perception). ...................................................................................................................
2.1.1. Vehicle-internal.............................................................................................................
2.1.2. Vehicle-external (e.g. backend) ....................................................................................

3. Overview major components (units) of "The System"
3.1. Control Units.................................................................................................................
3.2. Sensors ..........................................................................................................................
3.3. Maps/Positioning ..........................................................................................................

4. System layout and schematics
4.1. Schematic system layout including sensors for the environmental perception (e.g.
block diagram) ..............................................................................................................
4.2. List and schematic overview of interconnections (e.g. block diagram) ........................
5. Specifications
5.1. Means to check the correct operational status of the system.........................................
5.2. Means implemented to protect against simple unauthorized activation/operation and

interventions into the system.........................................................................................
6. Safety Concept
6.1. Safe Operation – Vehicle Manufacturer Statement.......................................................
6.2. Outline software architecture (e.g. block diagram) .......................................................
6.3. Means by which the realization of the system logic is determined ...............................
6.4. General explanation of the main design provisions built into "The System" so as to
generate safe operation and interaction with other road users under fault conditions,
under operational disturbances and the occurrence of planned/unplanned conditions
that would exceed the ODD. .........................................................................................
6.5. General description of failure handling main principles, fall-back level strategy
including risk mitigation strategy (minimum risk manoeuvre) .....................................
6.6. Driver, vehicle occupants and other road users interaction including warning signals
and transition demands to be given to driver. ...............................................................
40
6.7. Validation by the manufacturer for the performance requirements specified

elsewhere in the regulation including the OEDR, the HMI, the respect of traffic rules
and the conclusion that that the system is designed in such a way that it is free from
unreasonable risks for the driver, vehicle occupants and other road users....................
7. Verification and test by the authorities
7.1. Verification of the basic function of "The System" ......................................................
7.2. Examples for checking the system reaction under the influence of a failure or an
operational disturbance, emergency conditions and boundary conditions ....................
8. Data Storage System
8.1. Type of Data stored .......................................................................................................
8.2. Storage location ............................................................................................................
8.3. Recorded occurrences and data elements means to ensure data security and data
protection ......................................................................................................................
8.4. Means to access the data ...............................................................................................

9. Cyber security (cross reference to the cyber regulation is possible)
9.1. General description of the cyber security and software update management scheme...
9.2. General description of the different risks and measures put in place to mitigate these
risks. ..............................................................................................................................
9.3. General description of the update procedure.................................................................

10. Information provisions to users
10.1. Model of the information provided to users (including expected driver’s tasks within
the ODD and when going out of the ODD. ..................................................................
10.2. Extract of the relevant part of the owner`s manual .......................................................
41
Guidance on Traffic disturbance critical scenarios for ALKS
1. General
1. This document clarifies derivation process to define conditions under which
Automated Lane Keeping Systems (ALKS) shall avoid a collision. Conditions
under which ALKS shall avoid a collision are determined by a general
simulation program with following attentive human driver performance model
and1 related parameters in the traffic critical disturbance scenarios.
2. Traffic critical scenarios

2.1. Traffic disturbance critical scenarios are those which have conditions under
which ALKS may not be able to avoid a collision.
2.2. Following three are traffic critical scenarios:
(a) Cut-in: the ‘other vehicle’ suddenly merges in front of the ‘ego
vehicle’
(b) Cut-out: the ‘other vehicle’ suddenly exits the lane of the ‘ego
vehicle’
(c) Deceleration: the ‘other vehicle’ suddenly decelerates in front of the
‘ego vehicle’
2.3. Each of these traffic critical scenarios can be created using the following
parameters/elements:
(a) Road geometry
(b) Other vehicles’ behavior/ maneuver
3. Performance model of ALKS

3.1. Traffic critical scenarios of ALKS are divided into preventable and
unpreventable scenarios. The threshold for preventable/unpreventable is based
on the simulated performance of a skilled and attentive human driver. It is
expected that some of the "unpreventable" scenarios by human standards may
actually be preventable by the ALKS system.
3.2. In a low-speed ALKS scenario, the avoidance capability of the driver model is
assumed to be only by braking. The driver model is separated into the
following three segments: "Perception"; "Decision"; and, "Reaction". The
following diagram is a visual representation of these segments:
3.3. To determine conditions under which Automated Lane Keeping Systems
(ALKS) shall avoid a collision, performance model factors for these three
segments in the following table should be used as the performance model of
ALKS considering attentive human drivers’ behavior with ADAS.
42
Figure 1
Skilled human performance model
Table 1
Performance model factors for vehicles
Factors
Risk perception point Lane change (cutting in, Deviation of the center of a vehicle over
cutting out) 0.375m from the center of the driving lane
(derived from research by Japan)
Deceleration Deceleration ratio of preceding vehicle and
following distance of ego vehicle
Risk evaluation time 0.4 seconds
(from research by Japan)
Time duration from having finished perception until 0.75 seconds
starting deceleration
(common data in Japan)
Jerking time to full deceleration (road friction 1.0) 0.6 seconds to 0.774G
(from experiments by NHTSA and Japan)
Jerking time to full deceleration (after full wrap of 0.6 seconds to 0.85G
ego vehicle and cut-in vehicle, road friction 1.0)
(derived from UN Regulation No. 152 on
AEBS)
3.4. Driver model for the three ALKS scenarios:

3.4.1. For Cut in scenario:
The lateral wandering distance the vehicle will normally wander within the
lane is 0.375m.
The perceived boundary for cut-in occurs when the vehicle exceeds the normal
lateral wandering distance (possibly prior to actual lane change)
43
The distance a. is the perception distance based on the perception time [a]. It
defines the lateral distance required to perceive that a vehicle is executing a
cut-in manoeuvre a. is obtained from the following formula;
a.= lateral movement speed x Risk perception time [a] (0.4sec)
The risk perception time begins when the leading vehicle exceeds the cut-in
boundary threshold.
Max lateral movement speed is real world data in Japan.
Risk perception time [a] is driving simulator data in Japan.
2sec* is specified as the maximum Time To Collision (TTC) below which it
was concluded that there is a danger of collision in the longitudinal direction.
Note: TTC = 2.0sec is chosen based on the UN Regulation guidelines on
warning signals.
Figure 2
Driver model for thecut-in scenario
3.4.2. For Cut out scenario:

The lateral wandering distance the vehicle will normally wander within the
lane is 0.375m.
The perceived boundary for cut-out occurs when the vehicle exceeds the
normal lateral wandering distance (possibly prior to actual lane change)
The risk perception time [a] is 0.4 seconds #and begins when the leading
vehicle exceeds the cut-out boundary threshold.
The time 2 sec is specified as the maximum Time Head Way (THW) for which
it was concluded that there is a danger in longitudinal direction.
Note: THW = 2.0sec is chosen according to other countries’ regulations and
guidelines.
Figure 3
Cut in scenario
44
3.4.3. For Deceleration scenario:

The risk perception time [a] is 0.4 seconds. The risk perception time [a]
begins when the leading vehicle exceeds a deceleration threshold 5m/s 2.
Figure 4
Deceleration scenario
4. Parameters
4.1. Parameters below are essential when describing the pattern of the traffic
critical scenarios in section 2.1.
4.2. Additional parameters could be added according to the operating environment
(e.g. friction rate of the road, road curvature, lighting conditions).
Table 2
Additional parameters
Operating Roadway Number of lanes = The number of parallel and
conditions adjacent lanes in the same direction of travel
Lane Width = The width of each lane
Roadway grade = The grade of the roadway in the
area of test
Roadway condition = the condition of the roadway
(dry, wet, icy, snow, new, worn) including coefficient
of friction
Lane markings = the type, colour, width, visibility of
lane markings
Environmental Lighting conditions = The amount of light and
conditions direction (ie, day, night, sunny, cloudy)
Weather conditions = The amount, type and
intensity of wind, rain, snow etc.
Initial Initial velocity Ve0 = Ego vehicle
condition
Vo0 = Leading vehicle in lane or in adjacent lane
Vf0 = Vehicle in front of leading vehicle in lane
Initial distance dx0 = Distance in Longitudinal direction between the
front end of the ego vehicle and the rear end of the
leading vehicle in ego vehicle’s lane or in adjacent
lane
dy0 = Inside Lateral distance between outside edge
line of ego vehicle in parallel to the vehicle's median
longitudinal plane within lanes and outside edge line
of leading vehicle in parallel to the vehicle's median
longitudinal plane in adjacent lines.
45
dy0_f = Inside Lateral distance between outside edge

line of leading vehicle in parallel to the vehicle's
median longitudinal plane within lanes and outside
edge line of vehicle in front of the leading vehicle in
parallel to the vehicle's median longitudinal plane in
adjacent lines.
dx0_f = Distance in longitudinal direction between
front end of leading vehicle and rear end of vehicle in
front of leading vehicle
dfy = Width of vehicle in front of leading vehicle
doy = Width of leading vehicle
dox = Length of the leading vehicle
Vehicle Lateral motion Vy =Leading vehicle lateral velocity
motion
Deceleration Gx_max = Maximum deceleration of the leading
vehicle in G
dG/dt = Deceleration rate (Jerk) of the leading
vehicle
4.3. Following are visual representations of parameters for the three types of
scenarios
Figure 5
Visualisation
Cut in
Cut out
Deceleration
5. Reference
Following data sheets are pictorial examples of simulations which determines
conditions under which ALKS shall avoid a collision, taking into account the
combination of every parameter, at and below the maximum permitted ALKS
vehicle speed.
46
5.1. Cut in
Figure 6
Parameters
(Data sheets image)

Figure 7
Overview
47
Figure 8
For Ve0 = 60 kph
48
49
Figure 9
For Ve0 = 50 kph
50
51
Figure 10
For Ve0 = 40 kph
52
Figure 11
For Ve0 = 30 kph
53
Figure 12
For Ve0 =20 kph
5.2. Cut out

It is possible to avoid all the deceleration (stop) vehicles ahead of the
preceding vehicle cut-out in the following running condition at THW 2.0 sec.
54
Figure 13
Parameters
(Data sheets image)
55
56
57
5.4. Deceleration
It is possible to avoid sudden deceleration of -1.0G or less in the follow-up
driving situation at THW 2.0sec.
(Data sheet image)
(Data sheets image)
58
Annex 5
Annex 5
Test Specifications for ALKS
1. Introduction
This annex defines tests with the purpose to verify the technical requirements
on ALKS.
Until such time that specific test provisions have been agreed, the Technical
Service shall ensure that the ALKS is subject to at least the tests outlined in
Annex 5. The specific test parameters for each test shall be selected by the
Technical Service and shall be recorded in the test report in such a manner that
allows traceability and repeatability of the test setup.
Pass- and Fail-Criteria for tests are derived solely from the technical
requirements in paragraphs 5 to 7 of the Regulation. These requirements are
worded in a way that they allow the derivation of pass-fail-criteria not only for
a given set of test parameters, but for any combination of parameters in which
the system is designed to work (e.g. operating speed range, operating lateral
acceleration range, curvature range as contained in the system boundaries).
The test specifications in this document are meant to be a minimum set of tests,
the technical service authorities may perform any other test within the system
boundaries and may then compare the measured results against the
requirements (concrete: expected test outcome).
2. Definitions
For the purposes of this Annex,
2.1. "Time to Collision" (TTC) means the value of time obtained by dividing the
longitudinal distance (in the direction of travel of the subject vehicle) between
the subject vehicle and the target by the longitudinal relative speed of the
subject vehicle and the target, at any instant in time
2.2. "Offset" means the distance between the vehicle’s and the respective target’s
longitudinal median plane in driving direction, measured on the ground,
normalized by the half the vehicle width excluding devices for indirect vision
and corrected by adding 50 per cent.
2.3. "Pedestrian Target" means a soft target that represents a pedestrian.
2.4. "Passenger car Target" means a target that represents a passenger car vehicle.
2.5. "Powered Two-Wheeler Target (PTW)" means a combination of a motorcycle
and motorcyclist.
3. General principles
3.1. Test conditions
3.1.1. The tests shall be performed under conditions (e.g. environmental, road
geometry) that allow the activation of the ALKS.
3.1.2. If system modifications are required in order to allow testing, e.g. road type
assessment criteria or road type information (map data), it shall be ensured that
these modifications don’t have an effect on the test results. These
modifications shall in principle be documented and annexed to the test report.
The description and the evidence of influence (if any) of these modifications
shall be documented and annexed to the test report.
59
Annex 5
3.1.3. The test surface shall afford at least the adhesion required by the scenario in
order to achieve the expected test result.
3.1.4. Test Targets
3.1.4.1. The target used for the vehicle detection tests shall be a regular high-volume
series production vehicle of Category M or N or alternatively a "soft target"
representative of a vehicle in terms of its identification characteristics
applicable to the sensor system of the ALKS under test according to ISO
19206-3:2018. The reference point for the location of the vehicle shall be the
most rearward point on the centreline of the vehicle.
3.1.4.2. The target used for the Powered-Two-wheeler tests shall be a test device
according to ISO CD 19206-5 or a type approved high volume series
production motorcycle of Category L3 with an engine capacity not exceeding
600 cm3. The reference point for the location of the motorcycle shall be the
most backward point on the centreline of the motorcycle
3.1.4.3. The target used for the pedestrian detection tests shall be an "articulated soft
target" and be representative of the human attributes applicable to the sensor
system of the AEBS under test according to ISO 19206-2:2018.
3.1.4.4. Details that enable the target(s) to be specifically identified and reproduced
shall be recorded in the vehicle type approval documentation.
3.2. Test parameter variation
The manufacturer shall declare the system boundaries to the Technical Service.
The Technical Service shall define different combinations of test parameters
(e.g. present speed of the ALKS vehicle, type and offset of target, curvature of
lane) in order to cover scenarios in which a collision shall be avoided by the
system as well as those in which a collision is not expected to be avoided,
where applicable.
If this is deemed justified, the Technical Service may test additionally any
other combination of parameters.
If a collision cannot be avoided for some test parameters, the manufacturer
shall demonstrate either by documentation or, if possible, by
verification/testing that the system doesn’t unreasonably switch its control
strategy.
4. Test scenarios to assess the performance of the

system with regard to the dynamic driving task
4.1. Lane Keeping
4.1.1. The test shall demonstrate that the ALKS does not leave its lane and maintains
a stable position inside its ego lane across the speed range and different
curvatures within its system boundaries.
4.1.2. The test shall be executed at least:
(a) With a minimum test duration of 5 minutes;
(b) With a passenger car target as well as a PTW target as the lead vehicle
/ other vehicle;
(c) With a lead vehicle swerving in the lane; and
(d) With another vehicle driving close beside in the adjacent lane.
4.2. Avoid a collision with a road user or object blocking the lane
4.2.1. The test shall demonstrate that the ALKS avoids a collision with a stationary
vehicle, road user or fully or partially blocked lane up to the maximum
specified speed of the system.
60
Annex 5
4.2.2. This test shall be executed at least:

(a) With a stationary passenger car target;
(b) With a stationary powered two-wheeler target;
(c) With a stationary pedestrian target;
(d) With a pedestrian target crossing the lane with a speed of 5 km/h;
(e) With a target representing a blocked lane;
(f) With a target partially within the lane;
(g) With multiple consecutive obstacles blocking the lane (e.g. in the
following order: ego-vehicle -motorcycle - car);
(h) On a curved section of road.
4.3. Following a lead vehicle

4.3.1. The test shall demonstrate that the ALKS is able to maintain and restore the
required safety distance to a vehicle in front and is able to avoid a collision
with a lead vehicle which decelerates up to its maximum deceleration.
4.3.2. This test shall be executed at least:
(a) Across the entire speed range of the ALKS
(b) For a passenger car target as well as a PTW target as lead vehicle,
provided standardized PTW targets suitable to safely perform the test
are available
(c) For constant and varying lead vehicle velocities (e.g. following a
realistic speed profile from existing driving database)
(d) For straight and curved sections of road
(e) For different lateral positions of lead vehicle in the lane
(f) With a deceleration of the lead vehicle of at least 6 m/s2 mean fully
developed deceleration until standstill.
4.4. Lane change of another vehicle into lane

4.4.1. The test shall demonstrate that the ALKS is capable of avoiding a collision
with a vehicle cutting into the lane of the ALKS vehicle up to a certain
criticality of the cut-in manoeuvre.
4.4.2. The criticality of the cut-in manoeuvre shall be determined according to TTC,
longitudinal distance between rear-most point of the cutting in vehicle and
front-most point of the ALKS vehicle, the lateral velocity of the cutting-in
vehicle and the longitudinal movement of the cutting-in vehicle, as defined in
paragraph 5.2.5. of this Regulation.
4.4.3. This test shall be executed taking into consideration at least the following
conditions:
(a) For different TTC, distance and relative velocity values of the cut-in
manoeuvre, covering types of cut-in scenarios in which a collision can
be avoided and those in which a collision cannot be avoided;
(b) For cutting-in vehicles travelling at constant longitudinal speed,
accelerating and decelerating;
(c) For different lateral velocities, lateral accelerations of the cut-in
vehicle;
(d) For passenger car as well as PTW targets as the cutting-in vehicle,
provided standardized PTW targets suitable to safely perform the test
are available.
61
Annex 5
4.5. Stationary obstacle after lane change of the lead vehicle

4.5.1. The test shall demonstrate that the ALKS is capable of avoiding a collision
with a stationary vehicle, road user or blocked lane that becomes visible after
a preceding vehicle avoided a collision by an evasive manoeuvre.
4.5.2. The test shall be executed at least:
(a) With a stationary passenger car target centred in lane
(b) With a powered two-wheeler target centred in lane
(c) With a stationary pedestrian target centred in lane
(d) With a target representing a blocked lane centred in lane
(e) With multiple consecutive obstacles blocking the lane (e.g. in the
following order: ego-vehicle – lane change vehicle – motorcycle – car)
4.6. Field of View test
4.6.1. The test shall demonstrate that the ALKS is capable of detecting another road
user within the forward detection area up to the declared forward detection
range and a vehicle beside within the lateral detection area up to at least the
full width of the adjacent lane.
4.6.2. The test for the forward detection range shall be executed at least:
(a) When approaching a motorcycle target positioned at the outer edge of
each adjacent lane;
(b) When approaching a stationary pedestrian target positioned at the outer
edge of each adjacent lane;
(c) When approaching a stationary motorcycle target positioned within the
ego lane;
(d) When approaching a stationary pedestrian target positioned within the
ego lane.
4.6.3. The test for the lateral detection range shall be executed at least:
(a) With a motorcycle target approaching the ALKS vehicle from the left
adjacent lane;
(b) With a motorcycle target approaching the ALKS vehicle from the right
adjacent lane.
5. Additional verification
5.1. (Reserved)
5.2. Compliance with the following provisions shall be demonstrated by the
manufacturer and assessed by the Technical Service at the time of type
approval:
Test/Check
6.2.2. Off mode after new engine start/run
6.2.3 System can only be activated if

(a) The driver is in driver seat & belt is fastened
(b) The driver is available
(c) No failures
(d) DSSAD operational
(e) Conditions are within system limits
62
Annex 5
Test/Check
6.2.1 Means of deactivating

6.2.4 Dedicated means to activate and deactivate
6.2.5 protected against unintentional action
6.2.6 Steering
(a) Holding wheel and brake/accelerate
(b) Driver holds steering wheel in response to transition and MRM
(c) After deactivation
6.3 Means to override the system

(a) Steering control
(b) Braking input higher than system
(c) Accelerating to speed within system limits
6.1.3.1. Criteria for deeming driver available
5.1.3 Driver support systems active
6.3.1.1. Driver attentiveness

5.5 System behaviour during a Minimal Risk Manoeuvre
(a) Driver take over
(b) Standstill (harzard lights)
(c) Re-activation disabled if reached standstill
5.1.4 Transition demand & behaviour/escalation

5.1.5 Driver resumes control
5.4 Without driver response (MRM)
(a) Planned transition
(b) Unplanned transition
6.1.2 Transition demand during operation

6.1.3 Exceed system parameters
5.4. Failure
(a) Detectable collision
(b) Driver not present
5.3 System behaviour for Emergency Manoeuvre

(a) Resulting in standstill
(b) Not resulting in standstill
7.1 System detection areas

7.1.1 Front
7.1.2 Sides
7.1.3 Visibility
63
Annex 5
5.3. Additional other test cases may be assessed if it is deemed justified by the
Technical Service. Some of the cases may include:
(a) Y-split of highway lanes
(b) Vehicles entering or exiting the highway
(c) Partially blocked ego lane, tunnel
(d) Traffic lights
(e) Emergency vehicles
(f) Construction zones
(g) Faded/erased/hidden lane markings
(h) Emergency/Service personnel directing traffic
(i) Change in road characteristics (no longer divided, pedestrians
permitted, roundabout, intersection)
(j) Normal traffic flow resumed (i.e. all vehicles moving > 60km/h)
5.4. Real-world test
The Technical Service shall conduct, or shall witness, an assessment of the
system, in a fault-free condition, in the presence of traffic (a ‘real-world’ test).
The purpose of this test is to support the Technical Service in understanding
the functionality of the system in its operating environment and to complement
the assessment of the documentation provided under Annex 4.
Together, the assessment of Annex 4 and the real-world test shall enable the
Technical Service to identify areas of system performance that may require
further assessment, either through testing or further review of Annex 4.
During the real-world assessment, the Technical Service shall assess at least:
(a) Prevention of activation when the system is outside of its technical
boundaries/requirements for ALKS
(b) No violation of traffic rules
(c) Response to a planned event
(d) Response to an unplanned event
(e) Detection of the presence of other road users within the frontal and
lateral detection ranges
(f) Vehicle behaviour in response to other road users (following distance,
cut-in scenario, cut-out scenario etc).
(g) System override
The location and selection of the test route, time-of-day and environmental
conditions shall be determined by the Technical Service.
The test drive shall be recorded and the test vehicle instrumented with non-
perturbing equipment. The Technical Service may log, or request logs of any
data channels used or generated by the system as deemed necessary for post-
test evaluation.
It is recommended that the real-world test is undertaken once the system has
passed all of the other tests outlined in this Annex and upon completion of a
risk assessment by the Technical Service.
64

Agreement

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Agreement

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Agreement

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3/Add.

Addendum 156 – UN Regulation No. 157

Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to

UN Regulation No. 157

Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with

1. Scope and purpose

1 As defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.), document

determined by the capability of the sensing system as well as the environmental

3. Application for approval

5. System Safety and Fail-safe Response

Present speed Minimum time gap Minimum following

(km/h) (m/s) (s) (m)

For conditions not specified in paragraphs 5.2.4., 5.2.5. or its subparagraphs,

5.4.4.1.1. Notwithstanding paragraph 5.4.4.1. a minimum risk manoeuvre may be

6. Human Machine Interface/operator information

The second level warning of the safety-belt reminder according to UN-R16

6.2.5.3. Deactivation during an ongoing emergency manoeuvre

7. Object and Event Detection and Response (OEDR)

8. Data Storage System for Automated Systems

9. Cybersecurity and Software-Updates

10. Modification of vehicle type and extension of

11. Conformity of production

12. Penalties for non-conformity of production

13. Production definitively discontinued

14. Names and addresses of technical series responsible

Concerning:2 Approval granted

1 Distinguishing number of the country which has granted/extended/refused/withdrawn approval (see

8.3. Minimum Risk Manoeuvre: ........................................................................................

Addendum to Type approval Communication No …

Country Assessed Comments on any restrictions

Country Assessed Comments on any restrictions

Arrangements of approval marks

1 The second number is given merely as an example.

Special requirements to be applied to the functional and

3.2. Description of the functions of "The System" including control strategies

may be provided by a labelled block diagram or other schematic, or by a

(b) Redundancy with a separate system.

driver, passenger or other road users, inadequate control, challenging

development, production, operation including respect of traffic rules, and

4. Verification and tests

6. Communication to other Type Approval

7. Competence of the auditors/assessors

Model assessment form for Automated Lane Keeping System

Test report No: ......................................

1.1. Make: ............................................................................................................................

1.2. Vehicle Type: ................................................................................................................

1.3. Means of system identification on the vehicle: .............................................................

1.4. Location of that marking:..............................................................................................

1.6. If applicable, name and address of manufacturer’s representative:...............................

1.7. Manufacturer’s formal documentation package:

2. Test vehicle(s)/system(s) description

2.1. General description: ......................................................................................................

3. Manufacturer’s safety concept

The manufacturer(s) ............................................................. affirm(s) that the "The

3.4. Explanation of the safety concept of "The System": .....................................................

3.6. Description of the measures in place for environmental conditions: ............................

3.10. Date of test(s): ...............................................................................................................

Technical Service carrying out the test

3.12. Comments: ....................................................................................................................