Republic of the Philippines

SDO
Department of Education
LOGO

GMEF SCORESHEET

Name of the Organization Assessed: SAMPLE - Gen. Ricardo Papa Memorial HS - Annex -Cluster 1
Date Administered: August 29, 2023
Inclusive Period of Assessment: FY 2022 - 2023

Key Areas
Policy
1. Issuance of initial policies on GAD
2. Issuance of policies to mainstream GAD in the organization
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies
4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies
5. Model GAD Policy
Sub-Total:

Level for Policy:

People
1. On Establishing GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates
2. On GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities
3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs
4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers
5. GAD Experts
Sub-Total:
Level for People:

Enabling Mechanism
1. Setting-up of Essential GAD Mechanisms
2. Functional GAD Mechanisms
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Mechanisms
4. Advanced GAD Structures and Systems
5. Model GAD Structures and Systems
Sub-Total:

Level for Enabling Mechanisms:

Level for Enabling Mechanisms:

Programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs)

1. Initial Activities to Facilitate GAD Mainstreaming
2. Establishing Commitment towards GAD Mainstreaming
3. GAD Application
4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization
5. Model PAPs

Sub-Total:

Level for PAPs:

TOTAL SCORE
Over-all Level:

Over-all Level Description:

Ranges Level Description

0-7.99 points 1: Foundation Formation
8-14.99 points 2: Installation of Strategic Mechanisms
Level Per Entry Point
15-19.99 points3.GAD Application
20-23.99 points4: Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization
24-25 points 5: Replication and Innovation

Ranges Level Description

0-30.99 points 1: Foundation Formation
Over-all 31-60.99 points2: Installation of Strategic Mechanisms
Level 61-80.99 points3.GAD Application
81-95.99 points4: Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization
96-100 points 5: Replication and Innovation
 SDO
LOGO

EET

S - Annex -Cluster 1

FY 2022 - 2023

Score

3.34
2.5
3.34
1.67
0
10.85

4.15
4.15
3.32
3.32
5.01
19.95

2.5
3
4
4
3

16.5
 1.66
1.24
1.77
1
0

5.67

52.97

52.97
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

POLICY ORGANIZATIONAL ASSE

SCORE
DESCRIPTORS
NO PARTLY

1. Issuance of Foundational Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
1.1 Has the organization No policy/policies Policy/policies articulating
issued policies articulating
1.2 Has the organization articulating
No policy reviewed support to GADpolicies
Some existing mandates and
support
conducted to GAD mandates support to GAD mandates establishing
reviewed at
no newone
least (1) essential
1.3
and Has the organization No
and broad statement
establishing essential 1-2 broadofbut
element statements
GAD
policies
planning and
a review
issued of existing
broad supporting re-issued
supporting and/ or revised
GADrelated activities
establishing
policies the essential elements of
for of intentions or GAD-related activities GAD Sub-total GMEF
budgeting Score
statements
elements of GAD Planning planning and budgeting (Level issued
1 Policy)
issued
consistency
aspirations reflecting issued
and
with Budgeting?
emerging issued
its support
(possible for GAD
scores arerelated
GAD issues?
activities? (possible scores
0, 0.83 and
(possible
2. 1.67)
scores are 0, 0.83
areIssuance
0, 0.83 of Policies to mainstream GAD in the Organization (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
and 1.67)
and 1.67)
2.1 Has the No policy reflecting 1-2 policies reflecting the
organization issued
2.2 Has the organization No policy reflecting gender organization’s
the organization’s interest 1-2 policies reflecting gender needs
policies
issued reflecting
policies its
addressing for
needs of internal interest for gender mainstreaming
2.3 Has for
thegender
organization Gender-fair language and of
and/or Gender-fair language and images
interest
the gender needs of the gender
external mainstreaming
clients issued issued
internal and/or external clients issued
used
mainstreaming? images
issued not yet used in used
Sub-total GMEF Score
clients (internal
gender-fair and and
language policy issuances in some policy issuances
(possible
external)? scores are 0, 0.83 (Level 2 Policy)
images
and in its policy
1.67) scores are 0, 0.83
(possible
issuances?
and 1.67) scores are 0, 0.83
(possible
and 1.67)
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)

3.1 Has the organization No GAD Agenda/ GAD Agenda/Strategic

adopted a GAD
3.2 Has the organization Strategic Framework
GAD perspective not yet Framework
GAD formulated
perspective integrated
Agenda/Strategic
integrated GAD perspective formulated
integrated in organizational but
in not adopted
selected areasbyof the
3.3 Has the organization No organizational/ 1-2 organizational/
Framework?
in its organizational and/ and/ or national/ sectoral management
organizational
formulated national/sectoral Sub-totalnational/
GMEF sectoral
Score policies
(possible
or scores areplan/s?
national/sectoral 0, 0.83 plan/s and/ or national/sectoral
organizational/national/ policies on GAD issued on GAD issued
and 1.67) scores are 0, 0.83
(possible (Level 3 Policy)
plan/s
sectoral policies
andGAD?
on 1.67)
(possible scores are 0, 0.83
and 1.67)
4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)

4.1 Has the organization’s No gender gaps addressed Gender gaps of either
GAD
4.2 Haspolicy/policies resulted by
the organization GAD of
Results policy/policies
gender analysis internal
Results and/or external
of gender analysis
in
used the results of gender was not used in the clients
used inare
theaddressed
developmentby 1-2
4.3 Has the
bridging organization
gender gaps GAD perspective not yet GAD
GAD perspective
policies integrated
analysis
integrated in the
GAD development
perspective development
integrated in and/or
the and/or
in eitherenhancement of 1-2 policies
the Vision, Mission or Goals
of its clients
and/ (internal and
in its or enhancement
Vision,
external)? Mission andof enhancement
Vision, Missionoforpolicies
Goals
policies?
Goals? (possible scores
(possible
(possible scores
scores are
are 0,
0, 0.83
0.83,
are
and 0, 0.83,
1.67) and 1.67)
and 1.67)
 Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 4 Policy)

5. Model GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 5)

5.1 Has the organization’s Other organizations have 1-2 organization/s

GAD policies been used as not have used the organization’s
model/standard by used the organization’s policy/ policies as model/ standard
other organizations? policy/ Sub-total GMEF Score
(possible scores are 0, 2.5 policies as model or (Level 5 Policy)
and 5) standard

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(Policy)
of the Philippines
SDO
ent of Education LOGO

ICY ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE Enumerate broad statements issued

GAD
Means of Verification/Rem
RATNG Score Per Item related activities/issues (e.g., memor
YES organization to participate in Women’
activities,
) 18-day Campaign on VAW, etc).
Policy/policies articulating YES 1.67 Enumerate the GAD related policies i
support to GADpolicies
mandates Enumerate
Title
policy all policies issued addres
Some existing YES 1.67 Enumerate
needs
Type policies reviewed
Purpose/Subject Matter and/or r
and establishing
reviewed, alland
revised four on setting
revised
List all up GFPS
policies issuedorbyGADthe Office;
organizac
3 or moreelements
essential broad statements
of GAD NO 0 of internal
Date Issued
maintenance andofexternal clients of theda
sex-disaggregated
re-issued
supporting GAD-reated for
to consistency with new GAD issuan
(e.g.
planning and budgeting 3.34 conduct
policy
activities gender mainstreaming (e.g. issuance
issued issued issuance
of
department
of policy forgender
organization-wide
reconstituting the
order GAD
to
the establishme
Focal
integrate audit;
GADca
Point S
in
minding
building center for use of employees
plan
on
programs):
with
for
MC GFPS andetc.). HR of organization).
small2011-01,
children)
each item or question, 1.67) Title
Enumerate the organizational and/or
Policy
Title
Type Title
Purpose/
sectoral Subject Matter
Title
Purpose/ Subject Matter
3 or more policies reflecting YES 1.67 Type
Date
plan/s
Type Purpose/
in which Subject
Issued
Purpose/ GAD
SubjecthasMatter
been integra
Matter
the Date Issued
3 ororganization’s
more policies interest
reflecting NO 0 Date Issued
Date Issued
Philippine Development Plan, Annual
for gender
gender mainstreaming
needs of internal or
Gender-fair language and PARTLY 0.83 Attach sample policy of the organizat
issued
and/ Gender-Responsive LGU Plans such
images used in all 2.5 the
or external
policy clients issued
issuances Comprehensive Development
use of gender-fair language and Plan fo
polic
Organizational Plans (e.g., Work
policies of the organization that used Plan
Development
language and Plan, Procurement Plan
images.
Plan i.e.
Youth Plan, Disaster Plan, Disability P
r question, 1.67)
Title
GAD Agenda/Strategic YES 1.67 Attach
Type a copy of the GAD Agenda/ S
Framework formulated
GAD perspective integrated NO 0 Framework
Date Issued
and
in alladopted
areas ofby
the of the organization (or GAD Code, if L
3 or more organizational/ YES 1.67 Provide complete title of sector speci
management
organizational and/or
national/sectoral policies 3.34 policies
national/
on GAD issued plan/s
sectoral issued (e.g. Agency provision in the M
CSC-
Enumerate
Special Leaveenhanced policies,
for Women, guidel
DFAestab
documents enhanced based on the r
Gender Focal Point Officer in Philippi
gender
and Consulates, GAD Code, RH Cod
h item or question, 1.67) analysis.
WPS)
and attach copies if available.
Policy/ Guidelines and/or Documents
Gender gaps of either YES 1.67 List down
Gender existingTools
Analysis GADUsed
policies of the
internal Title
Results and/or external
of gender NO 0 and
Remarks
Type
clients
analysis are addressed
used in the how itPurpose/ Subjectgaps
bridged gender Matter
of its inte
GAD
by perspective
3 or more GAD policies NO 0 Identify
Date where
Issued GAD perspective
external clients (e.g. lowering and is res
int
development and/or
integrated in the Vision, Vision, Mission and/or Goals (VMG) o
enhancement of 3 or the
Mission and Goals organization.
cases Violence against Women
more policies
Title of GAD Policy Issued
Intended Client/ Beneficiaries
 List down existing GAD policies used
replicated by other organizations (e.g
Agenda or
1.67 Strategic Framework for NGAs; Polic
Provincial GAD Office or GAD Code f

GAD Policy
Organization/ Agency Adopting/ Repl
Policy
Remarks
3 or more organizations NO 0
have used the
organization’s
policy/ policies as model/ 0
standard

10.85
umerate broad statements issued in support of
D
Means of Verification/Remarks
ated activities/issues (e.g., memorandum for the
anization to participate in Women’s Month
vities,
day Campaign on VAW, etc).
umerate the GAD related policies issued (e.g.,
umerate
ecy all policies issued addressing gender
umerate
eds
pe policies reviewed
Purpose/Subject Matter and/or re-issued/
setting
sed
all up GFPS
policies issued orbyGADthe Office; collection
organization and
related
nternal
e Issued
ntenance andofexternal clients of thedatabase;
sex-disaggregated organization
consistency with new GAD issuances (e.g.
g.ductmainstreaming (e.g. issuance of DOH
cy
nder
uance of policy forgender
organization-wide the establishment
audit; of a child-
onstituting
partment
ding center the
order
forGAD
to Focal
integrate
use of GADcapacity-
Point
employees System
inand based
all clients
ding plan
grams):
hGFPS and HR of organization).
all2011-01,
children)etc.).
e
umerate the organizational and/or national/
eicy
pe Title
Purpose/
toral Subject Matter
epose/ Subject Matter
pee Purpose/
in which Subject
Issued
n/sPurpose/
pe GAD
SubjecthasMatter
been integrated (e.g.
Matter
e Issued
e Issued
Issued
lippine Development Plan, Annual Budget Call
e
ach sample policy of the organization directing
nder-Responsive LGU Plans such as
mprehensive Development
of gender-fair language andPlan for LGU)
polices as well as
ganizational Plans (e.g., Work Plan, Capacity
cies of the organization that used gender-fair
velopment
guage and Plan, Procurement Plan; Sectoral
images.
n i.e.
uth Plan, Disaster Plan, Disability Plan etc.)

e
pe a copy of the GAD Agenda/ Strategic
ach
mework
e Issued
he organization (or GAD Code, if LGU)
vide complete title of sector specific GAD
cies
ued (e.g. Agency provision in the MCW i.e.
C-
umerate enhanced
ecial Leave policies,
for Women, guidelines and/of
DFAestablishment or
uments enhanced based on the results
nder Focal Point Officer in Philippine Embassiesof
nder
d Consulates, GAD Code, RH Code and NAP
alysis.
S)
d attach copies if available.
icy/ Guidelines and/or Documents Enhanced
down
nder existingTools
Analysis GADUsed
policies of the organization
e
dmarks
pe
w itPurpose/ Subjectgaps
bridged gender Matter
of its internal and/or
ntify
e where
Issued GAD perspective
ernal clients (e.g. lowering and is responding
integrated intothe
on, Mission and/or Goals (VMG) of the
anization.
es Violence against Women

e of GAD Policy Issued

ended Client/ Beneficiaries
 down existing GAD policies used as a model or
licated by other organizations (e.g., GAD
enda or
ategic Framework for NGAs; Policy creating a
vincial GAD Office or GAD Code for LGUs)

D Policy
ganization/ Agency Adopting/ Replicating the
icy
marks
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

PEOPLE ORGANIZATION
SCORE
DESCRIPTORS
NO PARTLY

1. On the Establishment of GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates (max score: 5; for each item or question
1.1 Has the organization No policy/policies articulating Some members of the GFPS occupy
designated people in support to GAD mandates strategic positions in the organization
strategic positions as and establishing essential
members of its GAD elements of GAD
Focal Point System planning and budgeting
(GFPS)? (possible issued
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)

GFPS members GFPS members attended 1-2 basic

1.2 Have the have not attended GAD training
organization’s GAD any of the basic
Focal Point System GAD training
(GFPS) members
attended appropriate
and relevant training on
GAD? (possible scores
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83)
1.3 Has the Top management Only selected members of the top
organization’s top has not yet management attended Basic GAD
management attended attended Basic GAD Orientation or GST
Basic GAD Orientation Orientation or GST
or Gender Sensitivity
Training (GST)?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)

1.4 Have the Less than 50% of 50-99% of the organization’s staff
organization’s staff the organization’s members have attended Basic GAD
members been oriented staff members have Orientation or GST
on GAD? (possible attended Basic GAD
scores are 0, 0.41, and Orientation or GST
0.83)
1.5 Are the Top management Some GFPS members are aware
organization’s top and GFPS members and
management and GAD are not yet aware conscious of GAD-related policies
Focal Point System and conscious of and mandates
(GFPS) members GAD-related policies
aware and conscious and mandates
of GAD-related policies
and mandates?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)

1.6 Does the organization’s Top management does not Top management allows only the
top allow staff members to GFPS
management allow staff participate in GAD- related members to participate in GAD-
members to participate in activities related
GAD-related activities? activities
(possible scores are 0, 0.41,
and 0.83)

Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 1 People)

2. GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)

2.1 Does the top Top management Top management approves GPB but
management direct does not direct GPB not visible during critical/significant
the implementation implementation GAD activities
of the GAD Plan and
Budget (GPB) of the
organization? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)

2.2 Are program Program implementers not Only selected program implementers
implementers trained on yet are
gender analysis (GA) trained on GA and use of GA trained on GA and use of GA tools
and the use of gender tools
analysis (GA) tools?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)

Concerned staff members Concerned staff members are trained

2.3 Are concerned staff are in the importance of collecting SDD
members trained in the not yet trained in the and
importance of collecting importance gender statistics
sex-disaggregated of collecting SDD and
data (SDD) and gender gender
statistics? (possible statistics
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
2.4 Are male employees Male employees do not Male employees participate in the
involved and appreciative of participate in the organization’s GAD PAPs
the organization’s GAD organization’s
PAPs? GAD PAPs
(possible scores are 0, 0.41,
and 0.83)

2.5 Are clients (internal and Clients are not yet oriented Either internal or external clients are
external) aware of the GAD on oriented on the GAD efforts of the
efforts of the organization? the GAD efforts of the organization
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, organization
and 0.83)

2.6 Are the clients (internal Clients (internal and Either internal or external clients are
and external) able to articulate gender
external) able to articulate are not able to articulate issues/needs
their gender needs/issues in the in the development of the
gender needs/issues in the development of the organization’s
development of the organization’s GAD PAPs GAD PAPs
organization’s GAD PAPs?
(possible scores are 0, 0.41,
and 0.83)

Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 2 People)

3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs (max score: 5; for each item: .83)
3.1 Does the top No initial discussion among With initial discussion among
management top top management officials regarding
direct the integration of GAD management officials on the integration of GAD perspective in the
perspective in the integration of GAD organization’s PAPs and
organization’s programs/ perspective performance
activities/ projects (PAPs) in the organization’s PAPs indicators
and and performance indicators
performance indicators?
(possible scores are 0,0.41,
and 0.83)
 GFPS members and Either GFPS members or program
3.2 Are the GFPS program implementers are able to integrate
members and program implementers are not yet GAD perspective in the development
implementers able able of
to integrate GAD to integrate GAD perspective the organization’s PAPs
perspective in the in the development of the
development of organization’s PAPs
the organization’s
programs/activities/
projects (PAPs)?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83
3.3 Are concerned staff Concerned staff members Concerned staff members utilize
members able to utilize sex- are SDD
disaggregated data (SDD) not yet able to utilize SDD and/or gender statistics for GA
and/ or gender statistics for and/
gender analysis (GA) to or gender statistics for GA
enhance the organization’s
GAD PAPs? (possible
scores
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83)

Top management does not Top management appoints women to

appoint women to leadership leadership position but provides
3.4 Does the top positions limited
management support
support the appointment of
qualified women staff
members
to leadership positions?
(possible scores are 0, 0.41,
and 0.83)
3.5 Do women assume Women occupy less than Women occupy less than 50% of
critical 50% third
roles and authority in the of the third level, middle level positions but comprise 50% or
organization? (possible management and technical more of the middle management and
scores positions in the organization technical positions in the organization
are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)

3.6. Are the clients (internal No client (internal and Either internal or external clients
and external), able to external) involvement in the participate in the planning and
participate in the planning planning and implementation implementation of the organization’s
and of the organization’s GAD GAD PAPs
implementation of the PAPs
organization’s GAD PAPs?
(possible scores are 0, 0.41,
and 0.83)

Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 3 People)
4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)
 GFPS members are not yet Less than 50% of the GFPS
4.1 Are the GAD Focal serving as resource persons members
Point System (GFPS) on GAD within the are serving as GAD resource
members able to serve organization persons
as GAD resource within the organization
persons within the
organization, including
its regional offices and
attached agencies?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41 and 0.83)
4.2 Does the top No initial discussion among With initial discussion among top
management top management officials on the
direct the monitoring of the management officials on the monitoring of the organization’s GAD
organization’s GAD PAPs? monitoring of the PAPs
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 organization’s
and 0.83) GAD PAPs

4.3 Are concerned staff Concerned staff members Concerned staff members able to
members able to adjust not identify
GAD able to adjust GAD PAPs to emerging gender issues but are not
PAPs to address emerging address emerging gender capable of addressing them
gender issues? (possible issues
scores are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)

GAD is not reflected in the GAD reflected in the performance

4.4 Do top management performance contracts or contracts or TORs of either top
and concerned staff TORs of both top management or concerned staff
members reflect GAD management members
functions in their and concerned staff
performance contracts members
or terms of reference
(TORs)? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41 and
0.83)
4.5 Are concerned staff Concerned staff members Concerned staff members develop
members able to develop not GAD
tools and/or knowledge yet able to develop GAD tools and KPs on GAD with
products (KPs) on GAD? tools assistance
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 and KPs on GAD from external GAD experts/resource
and 0.83) persons

No participation from clients Either internal or external clients

in have
4.6 Are clients (internal and all levels of the development participated in 1-2 levels of the
external) able to participate planning cycle of the development planning cycle of the
in organization’s GAD organization’s GAD PAPs
3 or more levels of the PAPs
development planning cycle
of
the organization’s GAD
PAPs?
(possible scores are 0, 0.41
and 0.83)
 Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 4 People)
5. GAD Experts (max score: 5; for each item, 1.67)
5.1 Does the top Top management has not Top management is able to raise
management raised GAD concerns during GAD
raise GAD concerns during high- level meetings concerns during high-level meetings
high-level meetings/
discussions? (e.g. Cabinet
cluster meeting,
international
conferences) (possible
scores
are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)

5.2 Are the organization’s Staff members not yet Staff members recognized as GAD
staff tapped experts and tapped by 1-4
members recognized as by other organizations organizations
GAD
experts by other
organizations?
(possible scores are 0, 0.83
and 1.67)

5.3 Are external clients of External clients not yet External clients received nominations
the recognized for their gender or
organization recognized as mainstreaming efforts have shortlisted and/or cited in their
GAD champions by respective localities for their gender
reputable mainstreaming efforts by reputable
local, national and local,
international national and international
organizations? organizations
(possible scores are 0,
0.83 and 1.67)

Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 5 People)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(People)
of the Philippines
ent of Education SDO
LOGO

PEOPLE ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

Means of Verifica
RATNG Score Per Item
YES

or each item or question, .083)

All program implementers If yes, provide details on the po
are creation/reconstitution of the or
trained on GA and use of Point System (GFPS) and attac
GA no,
tools YES 0.83 explain why the organization ha
in
strategic positions as members
Point System (GFPS)?
_________________________
Point
GFPS members ______ members (e.g. Gender
System
attended all three Gender Analysis (GA) and GA
basic GAD training and
Budgeting).
YES 0.83
Title of GAD
Training Number of Participants
Trainer/ Institutional Provider
Date
3 or more broad statements List down top management offi
supporting GAD-reated GAD Orientation/Gender Sensi
activities issued
Name of Top Management Offi
NO 0 Basic GAD Orientation/ GST A
Institutional/ Training Provider
Date

100% of the Attach attendance sheets of all

organization’s staff Gender Sensitivity Training (GS
members have the
attended Basic GAD
Orientation or GST
YES 0.83 organization’s staff members.
 Some top If yes, explain how the top man
management and members
all GFPS members manifest awareness and consc
are aware and policies
conscious of GADrelated and mandates (e.g. top manag
policies and
mandates
YES 0.83 directs
implementation of GPBs, atten
allows
staff to participate in GAD-relat
appointment of qualified wome
positions, etc.)
Top management allows all _________________________
Attach copies of policies issued
key officials, GFPS allowing
members staff members to participate in
and staff members to office orders, travel orders, dep
participate in GAD- related
activities
YES 0.83 orders, admin memos, etc.) or
below:

GAD- related Activity

Participants
4.15 Organizer

m: 0.83)
planning on GAD, etc.)
Top management approves
GPB and attends critical / Attach relevant documents indi
significant GAD activities management to the implementa
Budget
YES 0.83 of the organization(e.g. attenda
Opening/
Closing Remarks during GAD t
during GAD
training, etc.)
All program implementers Title of GA
are Training Participants
trained on GA and use of Trainer/Provider
GA
tools NO 0
Date

Attach training design and atten

Gender Analysis and GA Tools
by program implementers.
Concerned staff members List down trainings conducted f
are members on the importance of
trained in the importance of sexdisaggregated
collecting SDD and gender data and gender statistics.Title
statistics,and are collecting
them
YES 0.83 Date
Conducted
Male employees initiate and Provide list of the organization’
participate in the and/or participated by male em
organization’s GAD PAPs
GAD PAPs Type of Involvement of Male Em
YES 0.83 Participants
*Type of Involvement of Male E
organizers and/or resource per
organization’s GAD efforts

Both internal and external If yes, identify efforts to orient c

clients are oriented on the of
GAD efforts of the the organization (e.g. PCW we
organization the organization, social media (
others.
YES 0.83 Activity
Targeted Audience
Date Conducted
Also attach results of assessme
to
measure awareness of clients (
Both internal and external Attach documentation of consu
the
clients are able to articulate survey,
GAD efforts of the organization
gender issues/needs in the focus group discussions,key in
development of the of
organization’s GAD PAPs issues raised by clients (interna
YES 0.83 consultations, etc.

4.15

Top management issued Attach directive/s issued by top

directive/s to integrate GAD GAD
perspective in the perspective in the organization
organization’s PAPs program/activities/projects
and performance indicators (PAPs) and performance indica
YES 0.83
Both the GFPS members Enumerate organization progra
and program implementers (PAPs) and
are able to integrate GAD performance indicators integrat
perspective in the by
development of the GFPS members and program i
organization’s PAPs
YES 0.83 Responsible Unit
- GFPS
- Program Implementers
Type Purpose/Subject Matter
Date Issued
disaggregated data and/or gen
Concerned staff members analysis
utilize SDD and/or gender to enhance the organization’s G
statistics for GA and ________________________
recommend strategies to _________________________
enhance the organization’s
GAD PAPs NO 0
_________________
Type of SDD/ Gender Statistics
P/A/P where SDD was Applied
GAD Efforts Enhanced

Top management appoints Attach documents issued by to

women to leadership the
position appointment of qualified wome
and provides full support leadership

YES 0.83
positions (e.g.department orde
training available, documentatio
activities, etc.).

Women occupy 50% or Position

more - Top Management
of the third level positions in - Middle Management
the organization
NO 0
- Technical Staf
No. of Men
No. of Women
% of Women
_________________________
Both internal and external _________________________
clients participate in the _________________________
planning and Attach documents showing ext
implementation in the
of the organization’s GAD
PAPs YES 0.83
technical working groups (TWG
management
offices (TWGs) as well as atten
documentation
of meetings participated by inte
clients.
3.32
50% or more of the GFPS Attach list and profile of the GF
members are serving as GAD-
GAD resource persons related training conducted.
within the organization
Name of GFPS Member who s
YES 0.83 Person
Title of GAD Activities Conduct
Name of Office/Unit, Regional O
Agency
Date Conducted

Top management issued Attach copies of directive/s issu

directive/s to monitor the regarding
organization’s GAD PAPs the monitoring of the organizati
YES 0.83 monitoring reports, as applicab

Concerned staff members

able List down GAD PAPs calibrated
to identify and adjust GAD gender
PAPs to address emerging
gender issues NO 0
issues.

Title of Adjusted GAD PAPs

Emerging Gender Issues Addre
Unit/ Concerned Staff Respons
GAD reflected in the Attach sample of Terms of Refe
performance contracts or Performance
TORs of either top Contract, Individual Performanc
management or concerned Review
staff members
NO 0
(IPCR) forms of staff members
Service
Performance Evaluation System
management
officials of the organization

Concerned staff members Please provide details of tools

develop GAD tools and KPs (KPs)
on GAD on their own on GAD developed.

YES 0.83
GAD Tools and/or KPs Develop
Purpose
Name and Designation of GAD
assistance
Both internal and external If yes, describe the participation
clients have participated clients
in all levels of the in the development planning cy
development planning cycle implementation and
of the organization’s GAD management, monitoring and e
PAPs
YES 0.83 organization’s
GAD PAPs.
_________________________
______
_________________________
______
 3.32

Top management is able to

raise and receive support
on Attach documentation of meetin
GAD concerns from where
colleagues during high-level GAD concern/s was/were raise
meetings
YES 1.67 management.

Meeting/ Discussion
GAD Concerns Discussed/ Rai
Name of Top Management who
Name of Person who Supporte
Staff members recognized Attach list and profile of interna
as
GAD experts and tapped by Enumerate seminars/conferenc
5 internal
or more organizations
YES 1.67
GAD experts for other agencies

Name of Internal GAD Expert

Title of GAD Activities Conduct
Name of Inviting Organizations
Date Conducted
External clients received
awards for their gender Awards/Citations/Nominations
mainstreaming efforts from Organization Conferring the Aw
reputable local, national and Date Conferred
international organizations
YES 1.67 Attach copies of news articles,
documentation
(e.g. TV interviews) regarding g
efforts of
the external clients of the orga

5.01

19.95
 Means of Verification/Remarks

es, provide details on the policy formalizing the

ation/reconstitution of the organization’s GAD Focal
nt System (GFPS) and attach a copy for validation. If

lain why the organization has not designated people

ategic positions as members of its GAD Focal

nt System (GFPS)?
____________________________________________
nt
____
stem members (e.g. Gender Sensitivity Training (GST),
nder Analysis (GA) and GA Tools and GAD Planning
d
dgeting).

e of GAD
ining Number of Participants
iner/ Institutional Provider
e
down top management official/s who attended Basic
D Orientation/Gender Sensitivity Training (GST)

me of Top Management Official

sic GAD Orientation/ GST Attended
itutional/ Training Provider
e

ach attendance sheets of all Basic GAD Orientations or

nder Sensitivity Training (GST) conducted/attended by

anization’s staff members.

es, explain how the top management and GFPS
mbers
nifest awareness and consciousness of GAD-related
cies
d mandates (e.g. top management approves and
ects
lementation of GPBs, attends GADrelated activities,
ws
f to participate in GAD-related activities, supports
pointment of qualified women to management
itions, etc.)
____________________________________________
ach copies of policies issued by top management
wing
f members to participate in GAD-related activities (e.g.
ce orders, travel orders, department orders, executive
ers, admin memos, etc.) or accomplish the table
ow:

D- related Activity
ticipants
ganizer

nning on GAD, etc.)

ach relevant documents indicating support of top

nagement to the implementation of the GAD Plan and
dget
he organization(e.g. attendance sheet, copy of
ening/
sing Remarks during GAD training, photos taken
ing GAD
ning, etc.)
e of GA
ining Participants
iner/Provider
e

ach training design and attendance sheets of

nder Analysis and GA Tools training attended
program implementers.
down trainings conducted for concerned staff
mbers on the importance of collecting
disaggregated
a and gender statistics.Title of Training Participants
e
nducted
 vide list of the organization’s PAPs initiated
d/or participated by male employees:
D PAPs
pe of Involvement of Male Employees
ticipants
pe of Involvement of Male Employees: as participants,
anizers and/or resource persons in the conduct of the
anization’s GAD efforts

es, identify efforts to orient clients on the GAD efforts

organization (e.g. PCW website, news, GAD corner in

organization, social media (FB, Twitter), among
ers.
ivity
geted Audience
e Conducted
o attach results of assessments or surveys conducted

asure awareness of clients (internal and external) on

ach documentation of consultations/ meetings (e.g.
vey,
D efforts of the organization, if applicable.
us group discussions,key informant interviews) and list

ues raised by clients (internal and external) during

sultations, etc.

ach directive/s issued by top management to integrate

D
spective in the organization’s
gram/activities/projects
APs) and performance indicators.
umerate organization programs/activities/projects
APs) and
formance indicators integrated with GAD perspective

PS members and program implementers

sponsible Unit
FPS
ogram Implementers
pe Purpose/Subject Matter
e Issued
aggregated data and/or gender statistics for gender
alysis
enhance the organization’s GAD PAPs.
______________________
____________________________________________
_______________
pe of SDD/ Gender Statistics
/P where SDD was Applied
D Efforts Enhanced

ach documents issued by top management supporting

pointment of qualified women staff members in

dership
itions (e.g.department order or executive orders, list of
ning available, documentation of mentoring
vities, etc.).

sition
op Management
iddle Management
echnical Staf
of Men
of Women
of Women
____________________________
____________________________
____________________________
ach documents showing external clients’ membership
he
hnical working groups (TWGs) and project
nagement
ces (TWGs) as well as attendance sheets and
umentation
meetings participated by internal and external
nts.
ach list and profile of the GFPS member including the
D-
ated training conducted.

me of GFPS Member who served as GAD Resource

son
e of GAD Activities Conducted
me of Office/Unit, Regional Office and/ or Attached
ency
e Conducted

ach copies of directive/s issued by top management

arding
monitoring of the organization’s GAD PAPs as well as
nitoring reports, as applicable.

down GAD PAPs calibrated to address emerging

nder
ues.

e of Adjusted GAD PAPs

erging Gender Issues Addressed
t/ Concerned Staff Responsible
ach sample of Terms of Reference (TORs),
formance
ntract, Individual Performance Commitment and
view
CR) forms of staff members and Career Executive
vice
formance Evaluation System (CESPES) of top
nagement
cials of the organization

ase provide details of tools and/or knowledge products

Ps)
GAD developed.

D Tools and/or KPs Developed

pose
me and Designation of GAD experts tapped for
istance
es, describe the participation of internal and/or external
nts
he development planning cycle (planning,
lementation and
nagement, monitoring and evaluation) of the
anization’s
D PAPs.
____________________________________________
____
____________________________________________
____
ach documentation of meetings and/or discussions
ere
D concern/s was/were raised by the organization’s top
nagement.

eting/ Discussion
D Concerns Discussed/ Raised
me of Top Management who Raised GAD Concern
me of Person who Supported the GAD Concern
ach list and profile of internal GAD experts.

umerate seminars/conferences/training facilitated by

rnal
D experts for other agencies and organizations.

me of Internal GAD Expert

e of GAD Activities Conducted
me of Inviting Organizations
e Conducted

ards/Citations/Nominations Received
ganization Conferring the Award/Citation
e Conferred

ach copies of news articles, other write-ups or

umentation
g. TV interviews) regarding gender mainstreaming
orts of
external clients of the organization, if applicable.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education SDO
LOGO

GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING M

SCORE
DESCRIPTORS
NO PARTLY YES

1. Setting up of Essential GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
1.1 Has the organization GFPS not created/ GFPS or similar GAD mechanism GFPS or similar GAD
created/ reconstituted its GAD reconstituted created/ reconstituted in the central mechanism created/
Focal Point System (GFPS) in in accordance with MCW office and/ or selected regional reconstituted in the
accordance with Magna Carta IRR and/or central office and all regional
of Women Implementing Rules Sec 37-C and pertinent attached agencies/offices only offices and attached agencies
and Regulations (MCW IRR) policies
Sec. 37-C and other pertinent issued by concerned
policies issued by oversight oversight
agencies? (possible scores are agencies
0, 0.83, and 1.67)
 No exploratory activities Organization conducted initial Organization initiated
initiated at all meetings/ exploratory activity/activities
1.2 Has the
consultations with PCW, with PCW, organizations and/
organization initiated
organizations or individuals to facilitate
exploratory activities
and/or individuals to facilitate gender gender mainstreaming
with the Philippine
mainstreaming
Commission on
Women (PCW) or
other agencies/LGUs,
institutions and/or
individuals to facilitate
gender mainstreaming?
(possible scores are 0,
0.83 and 1.67)
1.3 Has the organization No information collected Data and information collected but collected but are not yet
collected information towards are disaggregated by sex Intake
the establishment of not yet disaggregated by sex forms developed and used to
sexdisaggregated database collect sexdisaggregated data
and enhancement of its M&E or gender statistics
system? (possible scores are
0, 0.83, and 1.67)

Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 1 Enabling Mechanisms)

2. Functional GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)

2.1 Does the organization No functional GFPS based GFPS performing limited functions GFPS members actively
have a functional GAD Focal on based on the provisions of the performing all the functions
Point System based on the the provisions of the guidelines issued by relevant based on the provisions of
provisions of the guidelines guidelines oversight guidelines issued by relevant
issued by relevant oversight issued by relevant oversight agencies oversight agencies
agencies? (e.g. PCW agencies
MC 2011-01 for NGAs,
JMC 2013-01 for LGUs
and CHED MO 2015-
01 for SUCs) (possible
scores are 0, 0. 5 and 1)
2.2 Has the organization No other GAD mechanism 1 other GAD mechanism established 2 or more other GAD
established other GAD established mechanisms established
mechanisms? (possible scores
are 0, 0. 5 and 1)

*Other GAD Mechanisms refer

to those in addition to the
GFPS and the GAD Database

No GAD budget utilized Organization utilized less than 5% of Organization utilized 5% or

2.3. Has the organization total budget to implement GAD PAPs more of total budget to
utilized at least 5% of its implement GAD PAPs
budget * to implement GAD
PAPs? (possible scores are 0,
0. 5 and 1)

*refers to the total GAA of

NGAs and LGUs or COB for
GOCCs
2.4 Has engagement with Organization has not Organization has sporadic Organization has established
organizations such as PCW, engaged engagement working engagement with
LGUs and/or other agencies, with agencies/LGUs, with agencies/LGUs, institutions agencies/LGUs, institutions
and individuals been institutions and/or individuals and/or and/or individuals towards the
established towards the towards the conduct of individuals towards the conduct of conduct of GADrelated PAPs
conduct of GADrelated PAPs GADrelated PAPs GADrelated PAPs
of the organization? (possible
scores are 0, 0. 5 and 1)
2.5. Is the organization able to No effort from the Organization is in the process of Organization is collecting and
collect or generate sex- organization collecting or generating SDD and/or generating SDD and/or gender
disaggregated data (SDD) yet to collect or generate gender statistics statistics
and/or gender statistics*? SDD
(possible scores are 0, 0. 5 and/or gender statistics
and 1)

Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 2 Enabling Mechanisms)

3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
3.1 Do the organization’s other Other GAD mechanisms Other GAD mechanisms coordinate Other GAD mechanisms
GAD mechanisms coordinate, established but not functional and monitor progress of implementation
coordinate, monitor and
monitor and report the progress but do not generate status/progress generate status/ progress report
of the implementation of its report of implementation
functions? (possible scores
are 0, 0.5 and 1)
3.2 Has the organization Organization utilized 5% or Organization utilized 6-29% of total Organization utilized 30% or
utilized less of total budget to budget to implement GAD PAPs more of total budget to implement
30% or more of its total budget implement GAD PAPs GAD PAPs
* to implement GAD PAPs?
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and
1)

*refers to the total GAA of

NGAs and LGUs or COB for
GOCCs

3.3 Has the organization With AOM indicating non- With AOM indicating non-utilization of With AOM commending the
judiciously utilized its GAD utilization of at least 5% of its at least 5% of its budget for GAD judicious use of GAD funds or no
budget to implement GAD budget for GAD or Notice of with acceptable justification from the AOM from COA indicating
activities based on its GPB? Disallowance from COA with organization nonutilization of at least 5% of its
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and no justification from the budget for GAD
1) organization

3.4 Has the organization Has not partnered with other Partnered with 1 organization towards Partnered with 2 or more
partnered with agencies/ LGUs, organizations towards the the strategic implementation of GAD organizations towards the strategic
institutions and/or individuals strategic implementation of PAPs implementation of GAD PAPs
towards the strategic GAD PAPs
implementation of its GAD
PAPs?
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and
1)
3.5 Is the organization utilizing No SDD or gender statistics SDD and/or gender statistics utilized inSDD and/or gender statistics
sex-disaggregated data and/or utilized in the development 1-2 stages of the development planning utilized in all stages of the
gender statistics in the planning cycle cycle development planning cycle
development planning cycle
(planning, implementation and
management and monitoring
and
evaluation)? (possible scores
are
0, 0.5 and 1) Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 3 Enabling Mechanisms)
4. Advanced GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
4.1 Are the organization’s other Other GAD mechanisms are Other GAD mechanisms are fully Other GAD mechanisms are fully
GAD mechanisms able to fully functional but still has to functional and contributing to the functional and resulted in desired
contribute towards the contribute to the attainment ofattainment of desired impact/s impact/s
attainment of its desired desired impact/s
impact/s? (possible scores are
0,
0.5 and 1)

4.2 Has the organization Organization utilized 30% or Organization utilized 31-69% of total Organization utilized 70% or more
utilized less of total budget to budget to implement GAD PAPs of total budget to implement GAD
70% or more of its total budget* implement GAD PAPs PAPs
to
implement GAD PAPs?
(possible
scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)

*refers to the total GAA of

4.3
NGAsIs the organization’s Database has no SDD and/orDatabase with SDD and/or gender Database with SDD and/or gender
database
and LGUs or COB for GOCCs gender statistics and is not statistics generated 1-2 sector-specificstatistics generated 3 or more
with sexdisaggregated data able to generate sector- KPs on GAD sectorspecific KPs on GAD
and/ specific KPs on GAD
or gender statistics able to
generate sectorspecific
knowledge products (KPs) on
GAD? (possible scores are 0,
0.5
and 1)
4.4 Is the organization’s M&E M&E system is not able to M&E system able to track gender- M&E system able to track gender-
system able to track the desired track gender- related impacts related impacts of GAD PAPs on related impacts of GAD PAPs on
gender-related impacts of its of GAD PAPs on clients either internal or external clients both internal and external clients
GAD PAPs on clients (internal (internal and external)
and external)? (possible scores
are 0, 0.5 and 1)

4.5 Does the organization have KM system does not have KM system has GAD-related KPs KM system has GAD-related KPs
a KnowledgenManagement GAD-related KPs accessed and utilized by either internalaccessed and utilized by both
(KM) or external clients internal and external clients
System with GADrelated
knowledge products (KPs)?
(possible scores are 0,0.5 and
1)

Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 4 Enabling Mechanisms)
5. Model GAD Structures and Systems (max score: 5; for each item or question:1)
5.1 Has the organization’s GAD GFPS not yet recognized as GFPS nominated, shortlisted or cited GFPS awarded as model GAD
Focal Point System been model GAD mechanism by as model GAD mechanism by mechanism by reputable
recognized or awarded as a reputable organizations on reputable organizations on gender
model GAD mechanism by gender mainstreaming organizations on gender mainstreaming
reputable local, national, and mainstreaming
international organizations on
gender mainstreaming?
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and
1)

5.2 Has the organization’s other Other GAD mechanisms not Other GAD mechanisms recognized Other GAD mechanisms
GAD mechanisms been yet recognized by other as recognized as models by 3 or
recognized as models by organizations as models models by 1-2 organizations more
other organizations? (possible organizations
scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)

5.3 Has the organization Organization utilized 70% or Organization utilized 71-99% or less Organization utilized 100% of its
utilized less of its total budget to of total budget to implement GAD
100% of its total budget* to implement GAD PAPs its total budget to implement GAD PAPs
implement GAD PAPs? PAPs
(possible
scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)

*refers to the total GAA of

NGAs
and LGUs or COB for GOCC
5.4 Has the organization Database with SDD and/or Database with SDD and/or gender Database with SDD and/or
established a centralized gender statistics established statistics established and accessible gender
database with sex- but accessible only to the to statistics established and
disaggregated central office the central office, regional offices and accessible to the central office,
data and/or gender statistics attached agencie regional offices and attached
accessible to its regional offices agencies, as well as to external
and attached agencies, as well clients and partner organizations
as
external clients and partner
organizations? (possible scores
are 0,0.5 and 1)

5.5 Is the Knowledge KM system of the KM system of the organization KM system of the organization
Management (KM) system of organization integrated with GAD and replicated integrated with GAD and
the not integrated with GAD and by replicated
organization integrated with not replicated by other 1-2 organizations by 3 or more organizations
GAD organizations
and replicated by other
organizations?(possible scores
are 0,0.5 and 1)

Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 5 Enabling Mechanisms)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(Enabling Mechanisms)
 SDO
LOGO

ESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS

Means of Verification/Remarks
RATNG Score Per Item

Attach the directory of the newly-created/recon- stituted

GFPS of
the organization, including its regional and attached offices as
applicable*

YES 1.67

*Agencies with created/reconstituted GFPS or similar GAD

mechanisms in accordance with mentioned pertinent guide-
lines
with no regional and attached offices will be awarded 1.67
points
equivalent to a “yes” answer
 If yes, list down the exploratory activities initiated by the
organization (e.g. meeting with PCW for the identification of
necessary capacity development activities for GFPS and staff
members) to facilitate gender mainstreaming

List of Organizations/ Individuals

NO 0 Exploratory Activities Conducted
Remarks

Attach intake forms such as attendance sheets,

profile forms, etc., with separate columns for
sex, used by the organization to gather sexdisaggregated
PARTLY 0.83 data. Include list of information
that can be disaggregated by sex (e.g. list of
client beneficiaries, service providers, partners,
etc.)

2.5

If GFPS is performing limited functions, explain the

challenges
faced by the GFPS of the organization in mainstreaming
GAD.
_________________________________________________
_
YES 1 _________________________________________________
__
 Enumerate other GAD mechanisms established [e.g.
Committee on Decorum and Investigation (CODI), Violence
against Women and their Children (VAWC) Referral System,
Barangay Violence against Women (VAW) Desk, Women’s
Economic Empowerment (WEE) Desk, etc.]
NO 0
Other GAD Mechanism/s Established
Function/s
Members
Date Established
Attach the GAD Plan and Budget (GPB) and GAD
Accomplishment Report (GAD AR) of the organization for the
same fiscal year (e.g. 2013 GPB and GAD AR)

YES 1
If no, explain why budget allocated for the implementation of
GAD PAPs is less than 5%?
_________________________________________________
__
_________________________________________________
__
List down consultations with organizations/ individuals regarding the
conduct of GAD-related PAPs of the organization (e.g. conduct of a
series of capacity development activities and technical assistance for
the preparation of GPB,etc.):
PARTLY 0.5
List of Organizations/ Individuals Engaged
Purpose of Engagement (e.g., request for review of GAD PB etc.)
Results of Engagement
 If yes, enumerate types of SDD and/or gender statistics
collected or
generated (e.g., sexdisaggregated profile of employees, client
beneficiaries, cases of VAW, etc.).
_________________________________________________
_____
_________________________________________________
PARTLY 0.5 _____

If applicable, list down installed genderresponsive data

collection
system/s of the organization (e.g. National Violence Against
Women
(NVAW) referral system, genderresponsive Community-
Based
3 Monitoring System (CBMS) etc.)
_________________________________________________
______
_________________________________________________
_______

Attach status/progress report of the other GAD mechanisms

established by the organization, including analysis of its
functions
and recommendations.

YES 1
 Attach the GPB and GAD AR from the same fiscal year (e.g.
2013
GPB and 2013 GAD AR)

YES 1

Attach a copy of the Audit Observation Memo (AOM) or

Notice of
Suspension and Disallowances (NDs) received from the
NO 0 Commission
on Audit (COA) and the organization’s justification, if
applicable.

List the partnership/s or joint program/s towards the strategic

implementation of the organization’s GAD PAPs (e.g.
partnership for
the conduct of a GAD-related program)

Name of Partner Agency/ Institution/ Individual

YES 1 GAD Effort Implemented
Type of Engagement
Inclusive Dates

If applicable, attach copies of Memorandum of Agreement

(MOA),
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), Terms of Reference
(TORs),
Partnership Agreement, etc.
 List GAD-related data and indicators used in the development
planning cycle.

Development Planning Cycle Stage

YES 1
Data Utilized
Output
Indicators Used to Measure Gender- Related Impacts of
PAPs

Attach status/progress report, client satisfaction survey,

results of
gender impact assessment, documented testimonies, etc.
YES 1

Attach the GPB and GAD AR of the organization for the same
fiscal
year (e.g. 2013 GPB and 2013 GAD AR).

YES 1

Enumerate sector-specific KPs developed from database with

SDD
and/or gender statistics (e.g. caselets, case studies, briefers,
fact
sheets,etc.).
NO 0
Title of Sector Specific Knowledge Products
Content of the Knowledge Products
Utilization of the Knowledge Products
 Attach copies of M&E reports reflecting gen- der-related
impacts of
the organization’s GAD PAPs on its internal and external
clients,
such as:

1. NGAs: Gender Impact Assessment (GIA); Annual

Audit
Reports (AARs); Audit Financial Reports (AFRs); Special
Audit

YES 1
Reports (SARs); Socio-Economic Reports (SERs), Philippine
Development Plan (PDP) Reports, program/project reports,
accomplishment reports and other related knowledge
products
(KPs);
2. LGUs: End of term reports; Annual Audit Reports
(AARs); administrative/ accomplishment reports; State of the
Municipal Address (SOMA); State of the Province Address
(SOPA), Socio- Economic Reports (SERs), Regional Project
Monitoring & Evaluation System (RPMES) Reports, program/
project reports, and other related knowledge products
GAD-related KPs to its clients (internal and/or external).
Identify indicators that measure gender-related impacts of the
_________________________________________________
organization’s GAD PAPs.
______
_________________________________________________
______
YES 1
Attach the list of KPs produced and shared through the KM
system
as well as the KM Plan/ framework or link of the KM system, if
applicable.
4
 List awards/citations/documented testimonies received.

Awarding Institutions
Local/ National/ International
Award/ Citations Received
YES 1 Year

List awards/citations/documented testimonies received.

Awarding Institutions
YES 1 Local/ National/ International
Award/ Citations Received
Year

Attach the GPB and GAD AR of the organization for the same
fiscal
year (e.g. 2013 GPB and 2013 GAD AR)

YES 1
 Please provide link of database with SDD. If the data is not
uploaded in a website, list the information/data that are
accessible
to regional offices, attached agencies, external clients and
partner
organizations.

NO 0

Explain how GAD is integrated in the KM system of the

organization and list down other organizations that replicated
the
KM system.

NO 0
_________________________________________________
______
_________________________________________________
______

16.5
 Republic of the Philippin
Department of Educatio

PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES AND PROJE

SCORE
DESCRIPTORS
NO PARTLY

1. Initial Activities to Facilitate GAD Mainstreaming (max score: 5; for each item or question:0.83)
1.1 Is the organization Organization has not Organization initiated or participated
observing initiated in
international/ national/local or participated in the 1-2 observance of international/
GAD- observance of international/ national/ local GAD- related events
related events (possible scores national/ local GAD- related
are 0, 0.41 and 0.83) events

1.2 Has the organization No Basic GAD orientation or Basic GAD Orientation or GST
conducted Basic GAD GST conducted for its clients conducted for either internal or
Orientation or Gender external
Sensitivity Training (GST) for its clients
clients (internal and external)?
(possible scores are 0, 0.41
and
0.83)

1.3 Has the organization No consultation conducted Conducted consultation with either
conducted consultation with clients internal or external clients to identify
activities with clients (internal gender issues and corresponding
and strategies
external) to identify gender
issues
and corresponding strategies?
(possible scores are 0, 0.41
and
0.83)
1.4 Has the organization No consultation conducted Initiated consultation with either PCW
consulted PCW and relevant at or relevant organizations/ individuals
organizations/ individuals on its all on its GAD mainstreaming efforts
GAD mainstreaming efforts?
(possible scores are 0, 0.41
and
0.83)

1.5 Has the organization No review of existing IEC 1-3 existing IEC materials and KPs
reviewed and revised existing materials and KPs reviewed but not revised
Information/Education/ conducted
Communication (IEC) materials
and Knowledge Products (KPs)
to ensure use of gender-fair
language and images?
(possible
scores are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)

1.6 Has the organization set up No plan to set up GAD corne GAD IEC materials and KPs
a compiled
GAD corner? (possible scores and collected to set up GAD corner
are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)

Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 1 PAPs)

2. Establishing Commitment towards Gender Mainstreaming (max score: 5; for each item or question: 0.62)

2.1 Has the organization No GAD agenda or strategic Draft GAD agenda or strategic
formulated GAD agenda or framework formulated framework formulated
strategic framework? (possible
scores are 0,0.31 and 0.62)
2.2 Has the organization GPB is not based on GAD GPB is based on at least 1 of the
developed its GAD Plan and agenda/GAD Code, following: GAD agenda/GAD Code,
Budget (GPB) based on GAD emerging emerging gender issues,
agenda,emerging gender gender issues, international/ international/
issues, national GAD mandates and/ national GAD mandates and/or
international/ national GAD or results of gender analysis results
mandates and/or results of of gender analysis
gender analysis? (possible
scores
are 0,0.31 and 0.62)
2.3 Has the organization No deepening sessions on Conducted deepening session/s on
conducted deepening sessions GAD conducted GAD for either the GFPS or
on GAD based on the results of concerned
the Training Needs Assessment staff members but not based on the
(TNA) or updated GAD policies results of TNA or updated GAD
and tools as part of the policies
continuing or tools
capacity development of GAD
Focal Point System (GFPS)
and
concerned staff members?
(possible scores are 0, 0.31
and
0.62)

2.4 Has the organization used No GA tool applied to Results of the application of GA
Gender Analysis (GA) tools develop, tools used to review, enhance or
and techniques in the review, review and/or enhance develop 1-2 PAPs
enhancement or development PAPs
of PAPs?(possible scores are
0,
0.31 and 0.62)

2.5 Does the organization have No facilities and services With existing facilities and services
facilities and services that addressing gender issues that
address the gender issues and and address the gender issues and
concerns of its clients (internal concerns of the concerns of either internal or external
and external)? (possible scores organization’s clients
are 0, 0.31 and 0.62) clients

2.6 Has the organization No GAD orientation module Developed GAD orientation module
developed orientation modules with gender sensitivity as a but not yet included in the orientation
for new employees with gender- core competency developed of
sensitivity as a core new employees
competency?
(possible scores are 0, 0.31
and
0.62)
2.7 Has the organization No new GAD IEC materials Developed but has not disseminated
developed and disseminated developed new GAD IEC materials
new
Information/Education/
Communication (IEC) materials
on GAD to clients (internal and
external)? (possible scores are
0, 0.31 and 0.62)

2.8 Has the organization No GAD section in the Developed GAD section in
created agency organization
a GAD section in its website? website website but not updated
(possible scores are 0, 0.31
and
0.62)

Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 2 PAPs)

3. GAD Application (max score: 5; for each item or question: 0.71)

3.1 Has the organization Implementation of GAD Implementation of GAD PAPs
monitored the implementation PAPs intermittently monitored and not
of its GAD Programs/ Activities/ not monitored reported
Projects (PAPs)? (possible
scores are 0, 0.35 and 0.71)
3.2 Has the organization GPB and GAD AR not GPB and GAD AR submitted to
prepared submitted to PCW/DILG PCW*/
and submitted on time its GAD DILG** but not endorsed
Plan and Budget (GPB) and
GAD
Accomplishment Report (GAD
AR)? (possible scores are 0,
0.35
and 0.71)

*PCW endorses GPBs of

NGAs,
GOCCs and SUCs*

*DILG endorses GPBs of LGUs

3.3 Has the organization No GAD capacity GAD capacity development

conducted and sustained the development conducted
GAD capacity development of conducted and sustained for and sustained for either internal or
its clients external clients
clients (internal and external)?
(possible scores are 0, 0.35
and
0.71)

3.4 Has the organization No GAD capacity Conducted GAD capacity

conducted GAD capacity development development
development sessions for its session conducted to session but no internal GAD experts
internal GAD experts? (possible develop developed
scores are 0, 0.35 and 0.71) internal GAD experts

3.5 Has the organization No GA tools applied in GA tools applied in 1-2 levels of the
regularly development planning cycle development planning cycle
applied Gender Analysis (GA)
tools in the development
planning
cycle (planning, implementation
and management, and
monitoring
and evaluation)? (possible
scores
are 0, 0.35 and 0.71)
3.6 Has the organization GAD section has not been GAD section updated annually
regularly updated for more than a
updated its GAD section in the year
website? (possible scores are
0,
0.35 and 0.71)

3.7 Has the organization set up No existing plan to set up KMHas initial plan to set up KM
a
Knowledge Management (KM)
system as a mechanism to
transfer knowledge on GAD?
(possible scores are 0, 0.35
and
0.71)

Sub-total GMEF Score

(Level 3 PAPs)
4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.0)
4.1 Has the organization GAD mandate not GAD mandates continuously
sustained implementation implemented and monitored implemented but not regularly
and monitoring of international, monitored
national and local GAD by the organization
mandates
in its PAPs? (possible scores
are
0,0.5, and 1)
4.2 Has the organization No organizational sector- Organizational/ sector-specific GAD
conducted organizational/sector specific capacity capacity development session/s
specific capacity development development conducted for either internal or
sessions on GAD for clients session/s on GAD external
(internal and external)? conducted clients
(possible
scores are 0,0.5, and 1)

4.3 Does the organization GAD tools not applied to GAD tools used to assess
regularly apply gender analysis assess PAPs genderresponsiveness of 1-2 PAPs
(GA) tools to assess gender-
responsiveness of programs/
activities/ projects (PAPs)?
(possible scores are 0,0.5, and
1)
4.4 Has the organization No sustainability action plan Draft sustainability action plan on
developed a sustainability on GAD
action GAD PAPs formulated PAPs formulated
plan for its GAD PAPs?
(possible
scores are 0,0.5, and 1)

4.5 Has the organization Gender impact assessment Impact assessment of GAD PAPs on-
conducted impact evaluation of not yet conducted going
its Sub-total GMEF Score
GAD PAPs? (possible scores (Level 4 PAPs)
are
5. Model PAPs (max score: 5; for each item or question: 1.25)
0,0.5,
5.1 Hasand
the1 organization been Organization is still Organization has been recognized as
recognized as a GAD learning developing a learning hub but GAD PAPs are not
hub for its notable GAD PAPs? notable GAD PAPs yet replicated
(possible scores are 0, 0.62
and
1.25)

5.2 Has the organization’s No convergence model Convergence model recognized but
partnership with stakeholders resulting from partnership not
resulted in a convergence replicated
model
that is recognized and
replicated
by other organizations?
(possible scores are 0, 0.62
and
1.25)
5.3 Has the organization’s GAD KPs and GAD IEC GAD KPs and GAD IEC materials
Knowledge Products (KPs) and materials not yet cited as used and cited as reference by at 1-2
Information/Education/ reference by other organizations
Communication (IEC) materials organizations
on GAD been used by other
organizations? (possible scores
are 0, 0.62 and 1.25)

5.4 Has the organization’s Award system not yet Award system being reviewed for
existing integrated with GAD integration of GAD perspective
award/incentive system been perspective
integrated with GAD
perspective?
(possible scores are 0, 0.62
and
1.25)
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 5 PAPs)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(PAPs)
c of the Philippines
ment of Education SDO
LOGO

, ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTS (PAPs) ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

Means of Verification
RATNG Score Per Item
YES

estion:0.83)
Organization initiated or Enumerate GAD-related events initiat
participated in 3 or more organization (e.g. International Wome
observance of international/
national/ local GAD- related GAD- related event
events
YES 0.83 Initiated Participated
Date Conducted

Basic GAD Orientation or GST Attach training design, attendance she

conducted for both internal and training
external clients evaluation, if available.

YES 0.83
If no, explain why GAD Orientation or
Training
(GST) has not been conducted for the

Conducted consultation with Discuss the results of consultation act

both internal and external clients conducted.
to identify gender issues and
corresponding strategies Group Consulted (Internal/ External)
Purpose
NO 0 Results of Consultation (genderissues
identified)

If consultations were conducted, what

were
reflected in the GPB?
 Initiated consultation with both Enumerate results of consultations ini
PCW and relevant organizations/ of
individuals on its GAD organizations/individuals consulted.
mainstreaming efforts Name of organizations/ individuals Co
Agenda of the Consultation
NO 0 Results of the Consultation

4 or more existing IEC materials Provide a list of IEC materials reviewe

and KPs reviewed and revised use
of gender-fair language and images.

NO 0

Established GAD corner with Provide a copy of the plan or photo la

updated GAD IEC materials and list down titles of existing Information/
KPs (IEC) materials and KPs available for
and GAD Focal Point System (GFPS)

NO 0

1.66

item or question: 0.62)

GAD agenda or strategic Attach draft or approved GAD agenda

framework formulated and framework
approved YES 0.62 (e.g. Department Order setting 3-year
agencies or
its
GAD Code for LGUs).
GPB is based on at least 3 of the development.
following: GAD agenda/GAD
Code, Content of GPB
emerging gender issues,
international/ national GAD Basis of Development (GAD agenda/
mandates and/or results of
gender analysis
YES 0.62 gender
issues,international/ national GAD ma
gender
analysis)

Remarks
Conducted deepening sessions Enumerate the deepening sessions o
on GFPS
GAD for either GFPS or and concerned staff:
concerned
staff members based on the Title of of Deepening Session
results TA Provider (in house trainer, PCW)
of TNA or updated GAD policies Date Conducted
or
tools Also attach a copy of Training Needs
NO 0 and
design of deepening sessions.

If TNA was not administered, please e

organization
identified the need for deepening sess
basis
for the training design/s used.

Results of the application of GA Enumerate GA tools used to develop,

tools used to review, enhance or PAPs.
develop 3 or more PAPs
Name of PAPs
NO 0 GA tools Applied
Results of Application

With existing facilities and Enumerate facilities and services add

services and
that address gender issues and concerns of the organization.
concerns of both internal and
external clients GAD Facilities and Services
Clients (internal/ external)
Gender Issues and Concerns Addres
NO 0
(e.g. Facilities to address strategic an
needs of
women and men employees such as
breastfeeding center, and CODI, amo

Developed GAD orientation Attach copy of GAD orientation modu

module and included in the sensitivity
orientation of new employees as a core competency.

NO 0
Developed and disseminated Provide list of new GAD IEC materials
new audience.
GAD IEC materials
GAD IEC materials
Target Audience
NO 0 Remarks

Developed GAD section in Please list website link for the GAD S
organization website and
regularly
updated

NO 0

1.24

Implementation of GAD PAPs Attach monitoring reports on the imple

regularly monitored and reported

YES 0.71
GPB and GAD AR endorsed by Provide copies of submitted and/or en
PCW*/ DILG** Budgets (GPBs) and GAD Accomplish
ARs),
including cover letters.

PARTLY 0.35

GAD capacity development List GAD capacity development activi

conducted and sustained for clients.
both
internal and external clients GAD Capacity Development Activities
NO 0 Target Participants
Inclusive Dates

Conducted GAD capacity Enumerate GAD capacity developme

development session that and
resulted provide a list of internal experts and th
in the development of internal developed through these sessions.
GAD experts
Title and Date of GAD Capacity Deve
YES 0.71 Conducted
Internal GAD Experts Developed
Remarks

GA tools applied in all levels of Enumerate GA tools applied in any st

the development planning cycle planning
cycle and the frequency of application

NO 0
GAD Tools Applied
Purpose of Application
Result of Application
Date of Application
 GAD section updated quarterly Provide a schedule involving the upda
or the
more often organization’s website.

NO 0

Has set up a KM system to Attach the Knowledge Management (K

transfer plan/framework
knowledge on GAD or web link.

NO 0

1.77
1.0)
GAD mandates continuously List down GAD-related mandates bein
implemented and regularly monitored by the organization and at
monitored by the organization reports.
YES 1

Organizational/ sector-specific List down titles of organizational/secto

GAD capacity development development
session/s conducted for both session/s on GAD conducted or discu
internal or external clients development
of sector-specific GAD capacity devel
clients
being done by the organization (e.g. W
NO 0 Empowerment, Gender and Justice, G
Change).

Title of Organizational/ Sector-Specifi

Program on GAD

Participants
GAD tools used to assess List down Programs/Activities/Projects
Purpose
genderresponsiveness of 3 or list of
more PAPs gender analysis (GA) tools regularly a
organization.
NO 0
GA Tools Applied
PAP Assessed
Results of Application
Sustainability action plan on Attach draft or approved sustainability
GAD PAPs of
PAPs formulated and approved the organization.
NO 0

Impact assessment of GAD

PAPs
NO 0 Attach a copy of Gender Impact Asse
organization’s GAD PAPs.
completed and reported
1

Organization has been List down awards/citations/recognition

recognized received.
as a learning hub and its GAD
PAPs are replicated by other
organizations NO 0 GAD Program/ Activity/ Project Recog
Award/Citation Received
Year

If nominated/cited/certified, kindly atta

Convergence model recognized Describe GAD convergence model th
and replicated partnership and list down organization

NO 0

GAD KPs and GAD IEC Attach the GPB and GAD AR of the o
materials fiscal
used and cited as reference by 3 year (e.g. 2013 GPB and 2013 GAD A
or more organizations

NO 0

Award/incentive system Attach criteria for the existing award/in

integrated integrated
with GAD perspective with GAD perspective and provide list
NO 0

5.67
 Means of Verification/Remarks

umerate GAD-related events initiated or participated by the

anization (e.g. International Women’s Day celebration).

D- related event
ated Participated
e Conducted

ach training design, attendance sheets and results of

ning
luation, if available.

o, explain why GAD Orientation or Gender Sensitivity

ining
ST) has not been conducted for the organization’s clients.

cuss the results of consultation activities

ducted.

oup Consulted (Internal/ External)

pose
sults of Consultation (genderissues and strategies
ntified)

onsultations were conducted, what genderrelated issues

e
ected in the GPB?
umerate results of consultations initiated including names

anizations/individuals consulted.
me of organizations/ individuals Consulted
enda of the Consultation
sults of the Consultation

vide a list of IEC materials reviewed and revised to ensure

gender-fair language and images.

vide a copy of the plan or photo layout of the GAD corner and
down titles of existing Information/Education/Communication
C) materials and KPs available for use and reference of clients
d GAD Focal Point System (GFPS) members.

ach draft or approved GAD agenda and/ or strategic

mework
g. Department Order setting 3-year GAD agenda of
encies or
D Code for LGUs).
elopment.

ntent of GPB

sis of Development (GAD agenda/ GAD Code, emerging

nder
ues,international/ national GAD mandates/ results of
nder
alysis)

marks
umerate the deepening sessions on GAD conducted for
PS
d concerned staff:

e of of Deepening Session
Provider (in house trainer, PCW)
e Conducted

o attach a copy of Training Needs Analysis (TNA) results

d
ign of deepening sessions.

NA was not administered, please explain how the

anization
ntified the need for deepening sessions and explain the
is
the training design/s used.

umerate GA tools used to develop, review and/or enhance

Ps.

me of PAPs
tools Applied
sults of Application

umerate facilities and services addressing gender issues

d
cerns of the organization.

D Facilities and Services

ents (internal/ external)
nder Issues and Concerns Addressed

g. Facilities to address strategic and practical gender

eds of
men and men employees such as child-minding center,
astfeeding center, and CODI, among others)

ach copy of GAD orientation module(s) with gender-

sitivity
a core competency.
 vide list of new GAD IEC materials and the target
dience.

D IEC materials
get Audience
marks

ase list website link for the GAD Section of the organization

ach monitoring reports on the implementation of GAD PAPs.

 vide copies of submitted and/or endorsed GAD Plans and
dgets (GPBs) and GAD Accomplishment Reports (GAD
s),
uding cover letters.

GAD capacity development activities conducted for

nts.

D Capacity Development Activities

get Participants
usive Dates

umerate GAD capacity development sessions conducted,

d
vide a list of internal experts and their areas of expertise
eloped through these sessions.

e and Date of GAD Capacity Development Activity

nducted
ernal GAD Experts Developed
marks

umerate GA tools applied in any stage of the development

nning
le and the frequency of application.

D Tools Applied
pose of Application
sult of Application
e of Application
vide a schedule involving the update of the GAD section in

anization’s website.

ach the Knowledge Management (KM) system

n/framework
web link.

down GAD-related mandates being implemented and

nitored by the organization and attach the relevant monitoring
orts.

down titles of organizational/sectorspecific capacity

elopment
sion/s on GAD conducted or discuss status of the
elopment
ector-specific GAD capacity development session/s for
nts
ng done by the organization (e.g. Women’s Economic
powerment, Gender and Justice, Gender and Climate
ange).

e of Organizational/ Sector-Specific Capacity Development

gram on GAD

ticipants
down Programs/Activities/Projects (PAPs) assessed and
pose
of
nder analysis (GA) tools regularly applied by the
anization.

Tools Applied
P Assessed
sults of Application
ach draft or approved sustainability action plan on GAD
Ps of
organization.

ach a copy of Gender Impact Assessment Report of the

anization’s GAD PAPs.

down awards/citations/recognitions/ nominations

eived.

D Program/ Activity/ Project Recognized

ard/Citation Received
ar

ominated/cited/certified, kindly attach photocopy of

scribe GAD convergence model that resulted from the
tnership and list down organizations that replicated it.

ach the GPB and GAD AR of the organization for the same
al
r (e.g. 2013 GPB and 2013 GAD AR)

ach criteria for the existing award/incentive system

grated
h GAD perspective and provide list of the awardees.