0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views

Score Sheet GMEF - 2021 - Form

GAD GMEF
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views

Score Sheet GMEF - 2021 - Form

GAD GMEF
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

POLICY ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

SCORE SCORE PER


DESCRIPTORS
ITEM
NO PARTLY YES
LEVEL 1
Foundation Formation
1.1 Policies articulating support to GAD Mandates and
establishing four essential elements of GAD Planning and
Budgeting issued

1.2 Existing policies reviewed for consistency with emerging


GAD issues and issuances accordingly

1.3 Broad statements of intentions or aspirations reflecting the


organization’s support for GAD related activities issued

Sub-Total
LEVEL 2
Installation of Strategic Mechanisms
2.1 Policies reflecting the organization’s interest for gender
mainstreaming issued

2.2 Policies addressing the gender needs of the clients (internal


and external) of the organization issued

2.3 Policies issued by the organization use gender-fair language


and images

Sub-Total
LEVEL 3
GAD Application
3.1 GAD agenda/Strategic Framework on GAD adopted by the
organization
3.2 Organizational and sectoral plans integrated with GAD
perspective

3.3 Sector specific GAD policies formulated by the organization

Sub-Total
LEVEL 4
Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization
4.1. GAD policies of the organization resulted in bridging gender
gaps clients (internal and external)
4.2. Policies continually developed and/or enhanced based on
the results of gender analysis
4.3 Vision, mission and goals of the organization integrated with
GAD perspective
Sub-Total
LEVEL 5
Replication and Innovation
5.1 Gender responsive policies replicated by other organizations
as models or standard
Sub-Total
TOTAL
PEOPLE ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
SCORE SCORE PER
DESCRIPTORS
ITEM
NO PARTLY YES
LEVEL 1
Foundation Formation
1.1 People in strategic positions designated to be members of
the GFPS
1.2 GFPS members attended appropriate and relevant trainings
on GAD
1.3 Top management attended orientations on GAD
1.4 Top management and GFPS members aware and conscious
of GAD related policies and mandates
1.5 Top management supportive of GM efforts and has allowed
the organization staff members to participate in GAD-related
activities
1.6 Organization’s staff members oriented on GAD
Sub-Total

LEVEL 2
Installation of Strategic Mechanisms
2.1 GFPS members and program implementers trained
on gender analysis and use of gender analysis tools for GAD PB
preparation

2.2 Top management directed the implementation of the GAD


Plan

2.3 Clients (internal and external) aware of the GAD programs


and policies of the organization

2.4 Clients (internal and external) articulated gender


needs/issues in designing PAPs

2.5 Concerned staff members trained to collect sex-


disaggregated data

2.6 Male employees involved and appreciative of the


organization’s GM efforts
Sub-Total

LEVEL 3
GAD Application

3.1 GFPS and program implementers skilled in integrating GAD


perspective in the development and implementation of PAPs

3.2 Top management required integration of GAD in


organization’s MFOs, Program/ Activities/Projects (PAPs) and
performance indicators
DESCRIPTORS

3.3 Top management implemented policies and programs in


support of the appointment of qualified women to leadership
positions

3.4 More women assumed critical roles and authority in the


organization

3.5 Clients (internal and external) particularly women, actively


participated in the planning and implementation of PAPs

3.6 Staff members used and applied collected sex-disaggregated


data to surface gender issues towards enhancement of the
organization’s PAPs
Sub-Total
LEVEL 4
Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization
4.1 Staff members and GFPS members served as GAD resource
persons to attached and regional offices

4.2 Top management and concerned staff members tracked the


contributions of their GM efforts towards the fulfillment of
national and international commitments on GAD

4.3 Top management and concerned staff members reflected


GAD functions in performance contracts or terms of reference
(TOR)

4.4 Concerned staff members calibrated programs to address


emerging gender issues

4.5 Concerned staff members developed GAD tools and


knowledge products

4.6 Clients (internal and external) particularly women, actively


participated in the monitoring and evaluation and enhancement
of PAPs
Sub-Total
LEVEL 5
Replication and Innovation
5.1 Top management championed GAD concerns during high
level meetings/ discussions

5.2 Organization’s staff members recognized as GAD experts by


other organizations

5.3 External clients recognized as GAD champions by reputable


local and international organizations

Sub-Total
TOTAL
ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS
SCORE SCORE PER
DESCRIPTORS
ITEM
NO PARTLY YES
LEVEL 1
Foundation Formation
1.1 GFPS or similar GAD mechanism created/

reconstituted in accordance to MCW and pertinent policies


issued by concerned oversight agencies

1.2 Organization initiated exploratory activity with PCW or other


agencies, institutions and individuals to facilitate gender
mainstreaming
1.3 Organization collected data towards the establishment of
GAD database and enhancement of M&E system*
Sub-Total
LEVEL 2
Installation of Strategic Mechanisms
2.1 Functional GAD focal point system established based on
provisions of PCW 2011-01

2.2 Organization established Other GAD mechanisms to enable


gender responsive of PAPs

2.3 Organization GAD plan utilized at least 5% of total agency


budget

2.4 Organization worked with agencies, institutions and


individuals on GAD to facilitate gender mainstreaming

2.5 Organization database able to generate sex-disaggregated


data/gender statistics*

Sub-Total
LEVEL 3
GAD Application
3.1 Other GAD Mechanisms established by the organization
coordinated, monitored and reported progress of
implementation

3.2 Organization utilized 30% or more of total budget to


implement GAD activities based on the GAD PB

3.3 Organization utilized GAD budget judiciously*

3.4 Organization partnered with agencies, institutions and


individuals towards the strategic implementation of GAD
programs

3.5 Organization utilized sex-disaggregated data/gender


statistics used in gender in the developing planning cycle

Sub-Total
DESCRIPTORS

LEVEL 4
Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization
4.1 Other GAD Mechanisms contributed towards the attainment
of its desired impact

4.2 Organization utilized 70% or more total budget to


implement GAD activities based on the GAD PB

4.3 GAD database generated sector specific knowledge products


on women and men

4.4 M & E system of the organization tracked the desired


gendered related outcomes and impacts of PAPs on clients
(internal and external)

4.5 Knowledge Management System of the organization


produced and shared GAD-related KPs

Sub-Total
LEVEL 5
Replication and Innovation
5.1 GFPS recognized and awarded as a model GAD mechanism
by reputable local, national and international organizations on
gender mainstreaming

5.2 Other GAD Mechanisms recognized as models by other


organizations

5.3 Organization utilized 100% of total budget to implement


GAD activities based on the GAD PB

5.4 Centralized GAD database established and accessible to


regional and attached offices, clients and partner organizations

5.5 System for knowledge transfer of the organization


integrated with Gad and replicated by other organizations

Sub-Total
TOTAL
PPAs
SCORE SCORE PER
DESCRIPTORS
ITEM
NO PARTLY YES
LEVEL 1
Foundation Formation
1.1 International/ national /local GAD-related events observed
by the organization
1.2 GAD orientation and GST conducted for the organization’s
clients (internal and external)

1.3 Consultations with clients (internal and external) to identify


gender issues and corresponding strategies conducted

1.4 Consultations with PCW and relevant organizations/


individuals on GAD mainstreaming conducted
1.5 Existing IEC materials reviewed and revised to ensure use of
gender sensitive language and images
1.6 GAD corner set-up
Sub-Total 0
LEVEL 2
Installation of Strategic Mechanisms
2.1 GAD agenda and/or strategic GAD framework formulated

2.2 GAD Plan and Budget (GPB) developed is based on the GAD
agenda, emerging issues, new international and national GAD
mandates and result of gender analysis
2.3 GAD deepening sessions based on results of TNA or updated
GAD policies and tools conducted
2.4 GA tools applied in selected programs and in the review and
implementation of PAPs
2.5 Facilities and services that address gender issues and
concerns of clients (internal and external) established and
implemented
2.6 Orientation module for employees with gender sensitivity as
core competency developed
2.7 IEC materials on GAD for target audience (internal and
external) developed and disseminated
2.8 GAD section in organization’s website created, updated and
accessible.
Sub-Total
LEVEL 3
GAD Application
3.1 Implementation of GAD mandates, policies and PAPs
monitored
3.2 Organization’s GPB and GAD AR prepared, timely submitted
and endorsed
3.3 Capacity development on GAD conducted and sustained for
clients (internal and external)
3.4 Capacity development on GAD to develop internal GAD
experts conducted
3.5 GA tools regularly applied in the development planning cycle

SCORE SCORE PER


DESCRIPTORS
ITEM
NO PARTLY YES
3.6 GAD website regularly updated
3.7 Organization’s knowledge management system as a
mechanisms for knowledge transfer of GAD-related knowledge
products set-up
Sub-Total
LEVEL 4
Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization
4.1 Implementation and monitoring of international, national
and local GAD mandates sustained and institutionalized in the
organization programs
4.2 Sector specific GAD capacity sessions conducted for clients
(internal and external)
4.3 Application of GA tools in agency PAPs including ODA-
funded projects institutionalized
4.4 Sustainability action plan of GAD efforts developed
4.5 Impact evaluation of GAD mainstreaming efforts conducted

Sub-Total
LEVEL 5
Replication and Innovation
5.1 Organization is recognized as a GAD learning hub for its
notable gender mainstreaming efforts
5.2 Convergence model resulting from partnerships recognized
and replicated by other organizations
5.3 GAD knowledge products used and adopted by other
organizations
5.4 Existing award/incentive system of the organization
integrated with GAD perspective
Sub-Total
TOTAL
GMEF SCORESHEET

Name of Organization Assessment :

Date Administered :
Inclusive Period of Assessment :

Key Areas Score Score


Policy
1. Issuance of initial policies on GAD
2. Issuance of policies to mainstream GAD in the organization
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization's Policies
4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies
5. Model GAD Policy
Sub-Total
Level for Policy
People
1. For Establishing GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates
2. For GAD Initiatives and Capacity Development Activities
3. For GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs
4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers
5. Gad Experts
Sub-Total
Level for People
Enabling Mechanisms
1. Setting-up of Essential GAD Mechanisms
2. Functional GAD Mechanism
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization's Mechanisms
4. Advanced GAD Structures and Systems
5. Model GAD Structures and Systems
Sub-Total
Level for People
Programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs)
1. Initial Activities to Facilities GAD Mainstreaming
2. Establishing Commitment towards GAD Mainstreaming
3. GAD Application
4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization
5. Model PAPs
Sub-Total
Level for Policy
TOTAL SCORE
Over-all Level:

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy