The Poetics of Egyptian Museum Practice
The Poetics of Egyptian Museum Practice
The Poetics of Egyptian Museum Practice
In a recent study, Stephanie Moser (Wondrous Curiosities) discusses the abiding impact that
ive major exhibitions at the British Museum from 1759 to 1880 have had on the Western
perception of ancient Egyptian culture. Through an in-depth analysis of representational
strategies in the Egyptian installations of this period, she argues that the British Museum
instituted two enduring features of our understanding of Egyptian history. Firstly, its
cultural opposition to the development of Western society through direct contrast between
the material cultures of Egyptian and classical antiquity. Secondly, its unique popular appeal
among past cultures through its establishment as the most intellectually accessible subject of
ancient history. In an essay of 2003, Donald Preziosi (Brain of the Earth’s Body) provides a
historical and philosophical account of Western museological order in the late 19th Century
imperial exhibition of Egyptian history. Preziosi observes that the legibility of European art
history and modernity was achieved through narrative exhibition structures in which non-
European material cultures were assembled in ideological contrast to Western principles. He
argues that this disciplinary structure, by measuring cultural differences against a universal
standard of value, supported the political order of imperialism. This museological narrative
was thus central to colonial identity in Egypt, which was deined by its obverse relationship
to a characteristically Eastern or native identity. By simulating European exhibition styles
in Egyptian museums, these colonial institutions reframed a hybrid Egyptian identity into a
progressive, evolutionary account according to the nationalist interests of France and Britain,
and the Orientalist interests of European scholars and tourists. Consequently, the ideological
structure of Orientalism, vis-à-vis the representation of Oriental reality as an object deined
by its observed differences from the West, has imprinted European notions of meaning and
order onto the general perception of Egyptian history.1 Such analyses of rhetorical strategy
in 19th Century museum exhibition provide a framework for discussing the conceptual
development of Egyptian museums over the past 150 years.
Up to the 1850s, the scientiic and aesthetic principles in practice at the British Museum
did not support the systematic presentation of Egyptian material on its own historical terms.
According to Moser,
1
See Mitchell (in Preziosi and Farago, Grasping the World).
2
Moser, Wondrous Curiosities, 232.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 3
In the mid-to-late 19th Century, Egypt’s irst museums originated in the midst of an
epistemological shift, for both museology and Egyptology, from an abstract to a rational
perspective. Victorian display practices, having developed out of more abstract organizing
principles for the early modern collections of Europe, produced knowledge through objects
and the visual relationships in which they were arranged.3 As Steven Conn observes, the form
of Victorian display traditions, presented as an encyclopedic order of objects in glass cases,
‘made it possible for the visiting public to understand the meaning of museum displays’.
These Victorian museum forms relected contemporary ideologies of art, nature, and culture
in Western society, and were brought to Egypt under French and British administration.
It was also during this time in the second half of the 19th Century that a systematic
understanding of Egyptian antiquity was introduced by the emerging discipline of Egyptology.
The chronological framework advanced by archaeological studies replaced many of the
earlier concepts about Egyptian history that had been based on classical studies of Greek and
Roman art history. Along with the Victorian salon-style aesthetic imported from European
institutions, the early principles of Egyptian archaeology had a direct and lasting impact on
Egyptian museum arrangements. It was an encyclopedic style based on chronological and
taxonomic classiication that formed the basis for archaeological then geological, biological,
ethnographic, and historical display in Egypt.
It is important to qualify the presentation of ancient Egypt in terms of both museum-based
and discipline-based epistemologies of this time, because they reveal essential museological
precepts about Pharaonic culture. Firstly, that it came to signify Western advancement through
its appropriation as the ultimate Other represented as an essential and exotic counterpart to
the cultural development and identity of Euro-American society. Secondly, imperial display
methods established Pharaonic Egypt as the indigene of all Egyptian history. And third, exhibit
arrangements based on visual order and classiication provided the structural foundation for
all Egyptian museums to follow. The legacy of a priori exoticism and exclusivity afforded
to ancient Egypt by colonial institutions has persisted in Western representations for the
past two-and-a-half centuries, and this legacy was also inherited and later adapted by Egypt’s
postcolonial administration.
Throughout the 19th Century, Pharaonic culture became synonymous with Egypt in
representations from the outside looking in, framed by a Western-Orientalist perspective in
literature, painting, photography, and exhibition. From this perspective and with a European
aesthetic, Egypt’s irst major museums established an exhibitionary order that relected
Western ideologies by segregating Egyptian history within the urban fabric of Egypt itself
(Table 1). The Pharaonic collection came irst as the Boulaq Museum in 1858, and was
subsequently relocated to Giza in 1890 and inally, as the Egyptian Museum, to the center of
downtown Cairo in 1902. The Graeco-Roman Museum was founded in 1892, installed in a
building of neo-classical design in Alexandria, and the Coptic Museum was established at the
Hanging Church in Old Cairo in 1908. The Islamic Museum, née Museum of Arab Art, was
established in 1884 in the Mosque of el-Hakim in Fatimid Cairo, moving to a neo-Islamic
3
See Abt (in Macdonald, Companion), Coombes (in Preziosi and Farago, Grasping the World), Findlen (in Preziosi
and Farago, Grasping the World), and Schulz (in Pearce, Interpreting Objects and Collections).
Conn, Museums and American Intellectual Life, 8.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
4 DOYON BMSAES 10
Even in its striking new premises, the Museum of Arab Art never rivaled the Egyptian
Museum as a cultural landmark in either Western or Egyptian eyes. The Egyptian
Museum’s building of 1902 cost over four times as much as the building of the
combined Museum of Arab Art and Khedivial Library. Today the Egyptian Museum
remains a landmark in Cairo’s central square- despite being overshadowed by the Nile
Hilton, Arab League, Mugamma (a government ofice complex), and commercial
high-rises- while the Museum of Arab Art lies off the beaten tourist track… In 1913
the Egyptian Museum drew 29,879 visitors, six times as many as the 5,166 who visited
the Museum of Arab Art.7
A wide spectrum of critical studies has addressed the role of museums in the production
of scientiic and cultural knowledge, meaning, and identity.8 These studies examine the
epistemological development of Western museum structures from classical to Renaissance,
Victorian, and later ‘democratic’ concepts of museum organization. In this, they provide a
valuable analytical framework for the study of semiotic and metonymic strategies in museum
exhibition over the past ive centuries. Along with Reid, Frederick Bohrer (in Preziosi and
Farago, Grasping the World) and Wendy Shaw (Possessors and Possessed) relate this work to the
subject of Europe and the Near East in the 19-20th Centuries.
Shaw’s work in particular illustrates the metonymic function of museums in shaping the
identity of Near Eastern nations as a form of resistance to European colonial inluence. She
examines the distributive arrangement of antiquities in late 19th Century Ottoman museums
as an express effort to institutionalize a modern nationality in response to European imperial
overtures. Her discussion of the adaptive use of Western museum structures in the Ottoman
Empire relates to modern Egypt by demonstrating the repossession of a regional patrimony
through the selective use and modiication of inherited exhibition practices. The particular
adaptations she describes are dissimilar to those in postcolonial Egypt, but she establishes
an important precedent with this work by emphasizing the political and cultural agency of
reformulated display structures as self-relective narratives.
The museum practices of collection and display may have relied on European
5
See Reid (Whose Pharaohs).
See Preziosi, Brain of the Earth’s Body, 127.
7
Reid, Whose Pharaohs, 239.
8
Leading studies in this genre can be found in Karp and Lavine (Exhibiting Cultures), Macdonald (Politics of
Display and Companion), Preziosi and Farago (Grasping the World), and Yanni (Nature’s Museums).
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 5
examples, yet the modes of their performance in the Ottoman context addressed
local traditions and contemporary needs. As a space of selective collection, self-
relection, and conscientious display, the museum provides a unique venue through
which to consider how the Ottoman Empire adopted a European institution and
modiied it to very speciic local needs, ideologies, and aspirations.9
Shaw goes on to describe the Ottoman rejection of a positivist order of display based on
European epistemologies (evolutionary models of display emphasizing a cultural periodization
from primitive to civilized), and the resulting adoption of ‘a new language of archaeological
ownership,’ which instead ordered its classical antiquity according to expository principles
emphasizing ‘the contemporary geography of archaeology’.10 The re-telling of Near Eastern
history from a postcolonial perspective is thus achieved through the reordering of visual
associations in museum arrangements.
In the Ottoman example, displays based on historical provenance rather than on historical
contexts rooted in Western aesthetics and systematics expressed an emergent national identity.
In its own shift from a European-based to a postcolonial narrative, the Egyptian museum
tradition has composed its ‘language of ownership’ by emphasizing the longevity of Egyptian
identity. In Egypt, much of the architecture of display has remained the same, but the new
narrative structure has reintegrated local cultures into one long indigenous tradition stretching
back to predynastic Egypt. This integrated approach replaces the episodic approach of earlier
museum practice by allowing multiple cultural relections to occur simultaneously rather than
progressively.
Museography, that is the study of the museum and its methods as a documentary form,
can enhance the narratological study of Middle Eastern museums by adding a practical
dimension to criticism. In referring to methods for arranging and describing museum
contents, museography relates convention to ideology.
Egyptian museography is based on 150 years of modern precedent, two-thirds of which
was developed in the Western tradition under French and British administration and the
remainder of which has developed indigenously. The modern museum tradition in Egypt
begins with Auguste Mariette in 1858.
9
Shaw, Possessors and Possessed, 29.
10
Ibid. 164.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
6 DOYON BMSAES 10
11
Maspero, ASAE 2: 112.
12
See Reid (Whose Pharaohs).
13
Ibid. 96.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 7
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
8 DOYON BMSAES 10
is determined by their broad cultural administration within the SCA and SFA. Countrywide
centralization rarely distinguishes the individual museum standard from the national museum
standard, and generally encompasses everything from policy to programme.
The Egyptian curatorial tradition is absolutely fundamental to a broader understanding
of narrative in that the arrangement of personnel governs the museum process. Within
the SCA, staff curatorial appointments are classiied by material type, and for Dynastic
collections, by time period. Curatorial composition at the Coptic Museum, for example,
is based on twelve museum sections, which are 1- icons, 2- wood, 3- stone, 4- manuscripts,
5- metals, 6- textiles, 7- ivory and bone, 8- ostraca, 9- fresco, 10- pottery and glaze, 11- glass,
and 12- leather and reeds.15 The Islamic Museum has thirteen sections, which are 1- carpets
and rugs, 2- textiles, 3- metalwork, 4- woodwork, 5- ivory and bone, 6- arms and armor, 7-
ceramics and pottery, 8- marble, stone, and stucco, 9- manuscripts and bookbinding, 10- glass,
11- weights, stamps, and measures, 12- coins, and 13- jewelry.16 The Egyptian Museum has
seven sections, which are 1- gold, jewelry, and Tutankhamun, 2- Old Kingdom, 3- Middle
Kingdom, 4- New Kingdom, 5- Late Period and Graeco-Roman, 6- papyri and coins, and
7- ostraca, cofins, scarabs, and papyri. At the Egyptian Museum one head curator and four
or more assistant curators are assigned to each section, and the seventh section has two head
curators. Altogether, there are 8 head curators and 31 assistant curators, and of these 39, 30
are permanent and 9 are temporary.17 Permanent appointments are senior and temporary
contracts are provisional appointments renewed on an annual basis. Along with the curatorial
staff are 15 conservators (10 permanent and 5 temporary), 5 carpenters (1 permanent and
4 temporary), 17 object handlers (2 permanent and 15 temporary), 14 admissions staff (13
permanent and 1 temporary), 2 photographers, 4 public relations staff, over 90 security
oficers, and an undetermined number of technicians. The ofice of the director houses the
General Director, ive deputy directors, nine administrators, and three assistants. The café,
bookshop, gift shop, bank, and custodial services at the museum are private contracts for
which the administration is not responsible.
In the principal museum tradition, curatorial work consists of two roles referred to as
committee work and public relations. Committee work encompasses major projects of
collections management, conservation, study, and display, as well as routine tasks such as
object movement, photography, label revision, gallery preparation, lighting, and furniture
repair. Committees generally consist of three or more curators in addition to the technicians,
carpenters, object handlers, security personnel, and specialists required by a particular project.
The committee process determines the structure of daily activity and controls the movement
of objects and information within the museum. It is commonly a lengthy and formal routine
that occupies much of a curator’s time, though some curators also collaborate on contract
projects such as temporary and traveling exhibitions or ilm production.
The second main area of curatorial work, ‘public relations’, involves leading tours for
VIP and student groups and assisting foreign researchers (the latter may also come within
committee work). The ofice of public relations and its staff are responsible for coordinating
15
From www.copticmuseum.gov.eg.
16
From www.islamicmuseum.gov.eg.
17
From Egyptian Museum, pers. comm. April 2006.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 9
and receiving special museum guests, who may be assigned a curator-guide for their visit. In
this context, the public does not include tourists, whose experience is determined by private
guides or guidebooks. The public relations ofice does not handle external and media relations,
which are the responsibility of the SCA, museum director, and senior curatorial staff.
Museum curators typically possess baccalaureate or post-baccalaureate training.
Professional tour guides on the other hand are certiied through foreign language training and
are regulated by the Ministry of Tourism. During peak tourist season, the Egyptian Museum
may receive over 6500 visitors per day, and in that time an independent tour guide can earn as
much as twenty times the monthly salary of a senior museum curator in just one week.18 The
lack of instructional standards or guidelines for tour guides and the limited public impact of
curators create a reciprocal tension that often adversely affects the museum experience for
tourists and non-tourists alike.
For recent years, Egypt’s top-visited cultural museums include the Egyptian, Solar Boat,
Nubia, Luxor, and Graeco-Roman Museums, which hosted a combined average of about 2.5
million people per iscal year from 2001 to 2004 (Table 7). The Egyptian Museum attracts
around 1.7 million visitors per year, twice the average admission to all other major antiquities
museums in Egypt combined. The Solar Boat Museum comes in at a distant second averaging
around 206,300 visitors per year. The recently opened Mummiication Museum in Luxor is
close behind the top ive in overall popularity and received just under half the number of
visitors to the Luxor Museum, with an average of 73,000 visits per year during this period.
By comparison with museums emphasizing Pharaonic and classical antiquity, the Coptic and
Islamic Museums of Cairo operate on a modest scale with pre-renovation averages of around
43,600 and 21,600 visitors per iscal year (2001-2003), respectively. The Aswan Museum
received less than a ifth the number of visitors to the popular Nubia Museum at this time,
however it still claimed much higher attendance than other local museums, with 29,500
visitors per year. Regionally, among the local antiquities museums of Beni Suef, Ismailia,
Kom Oushim, Mallawi, New Valley, and San el-Hagar, annual visitorship ranged from 19,900
at the Mallawi Museum to only 2500 at the New Valley Museum. In terms of archaeology
alone, rural museum attendance represented less than 2% of general museum admissions for
this period, with stronger attendance in the provinces of Upper Egypt than in the Delta or
frontier regions. Despite new trends in the tourist economy, with beach tourism on the rise,
admissions to the major archaeological museums of Alexandria, Cairo, Luxor, and Aswan
increased by over 60% from 2001 to 2004, and regional attendance rose by 20% in that
time.
The Luxor Museum is second to the Egyptian Museum in terms of earned income (Table
8), and like the Egyptian Museum attracts a predominantly international audience. Of the
200,000 visitors to the Luxor Museum in 2004, 31,000 were Egyptian residents (Table 9).
Compared with the previous calendar year, Egyptian attendance rose in pace with international
attendance, maintaining a steady 16% of total admissions, and followed a similar pattern of
seasonal highs and lows with peak local attendance from November through April and peak
tourist attendance from October to March (igs. 9–10). Although the Egyptian Museum
receives ten times as many visitors as the Luxor Museum, their audience proiles follow similar
trends.
18
From Egyptian Museum, visitor logs and pers. comm. January 2006.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
10 DOYON BMSAES 10
In contrast, both the Bibliotheca Alexandrina and the Nubia Museum are local destinations
that secondarily support tourism. The Nubia Museum earns a much smaller percentage of
national museum revenue than the Luxor Museum, but on average receives more visitors. In
2005, 57% of the Nubia Museum’s total visitorship (179,951) was non-tourist and 40% of
those admissions were students from local schools, representing an average of 112 Egyptian
students per day.19
The new Library of Alexandria (Bibliotheca Alexandrina) is a self-directed public
institution governed by an elected Board of Trustees. With a founding mission ‘to be a
center of excellence for the production and dissemination of knowledge, and to be a place
of dialogue and understanding between cultures and peoples,’20 the Library is an institution
of means with a collection of over 400,000 books, an international advisory board, 1157 staff
members, and three permanent museums.21 Its revenue sources include government grants
and allocations (71%), cash donations (9%), operating revenue (7%), and interest income
(12%).22 The Library’s three permanent museums of archaeology, manuscripts, and science
form part of its Academic and Cultural Sector. The BA Antiquities Museum is a uniquely
cooperative administration in which the Library covers the museum’s operating expenses and
the SCA provides its staff and collections. The museum staff consists of 3 head curators, 9
assistant curators, 2 education coordinators, and 4 admissions staff appointed by the SCA,
as well as a number of technicians, security oficers, and digital guide managers appointed
by the Library.23 The museum director, with two administrators and three assistants, shares
responsibility to the Library and the SCA. Curatorial divisions are similar to the traditional
model, according to cultural period and material type, however in this case private tour
guides are not permitted in the galleries and instead the curators act as professional guides
and educators for the visiting public. In the iscal year 2004-2005, 57% of visitors to the
Library of Alexandria were local residents and its Antiquities Museum received 45,400 paid
visitors.24
Though economically signiicant, the earned income from Egypt’s destination museums is
culturally complex. Representing museums of archaeology, the local 16% of total admissions
to the Luxor Museum in 2003 and 2004 earned the museum under 2% of its annual income
from ticket sales (Table 10). Students represent a high percentage of Egyptian visitors and
are typically admitted free of charge. Of the Nubia Museum’s total admissions in 2005, 23%
were complimentary (22.8% students, 0.2% VIP). That the overwhelming majority of national
museum income is earned by foreign spending (over 70% of it at the Egyptian Museum
alone) underscores the role of tourism in sustaining cultural museums and programmes that
would otherwise be prohibitive for Egyptians, and highlights the responsibility of the SCA to
maintain and develop those programmes.25 Conversely, tourism itself may in some cases be
19
From Nubia Museum, visitor logs January 2006.
20
Bibliotheca Alexandrina, Annual Report July 2004-June 2005, 5.
21
Ibid. 179, 188, 208.
22
Ibid. 159.
23
Bibliotheca Alexandrina, pers. comm. February 2006.
24
From Bibliotheca Alexandrina, Annual Report July 2004-June 2005, 183-4.
25
Note that in museums governed by the Ministry of Culture all museum revenue and its reallocation is
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 11
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
12 DOYON BMSAES 10
With some very noteworthy exceptions, the museums with actual or potential local impact
tend to have the most limited resources. This is particularly so with natural history collections
in Cairo, which represent an extremely important but imperiled resource for Egyptian citizens,
students, and researchers. The Entomological Museum of Cairo for example serves a small
research community with a curatorial staff of four. Much like the nearby Egyptian Museum,
it retains the traditional architecture and character of its founding in the early years of the 20th
Century, but unlike the Egyptian Museum, its curators raise funds for the upkeep of collections
and publication of research. In this, there is an important contrast between museums outside
of the SCA, where barren of resources but free from the constraints of tourism and eager
to have an impact, and destination museums within the SCA, where crippled by the tension
between Culture and Tourism itself. It is telling that there are no dedicated museums of
ethnography governed by the Ministry of Culture.
The exceptions are a prosperous fourth class of local museums, which includes the
Bibliotheca Alexandrina, the Nubia Museum, the Luxor and Mummiication Museums, the
Islamic Ceramics Museum, the Abdin Palace Museum, and a scatter of arts museums in
greater Cairo. Curators at these museums are involved in guiding and instructing the public
in their subjects, even without the infrastructure to study or publish their collections. With
these museums lies a discernible trend in the professionalization of museum curatorship and
education in Egypt, particularly as concerns art museums. The development of this trend to
include more advanced curatorial functions in Egyptology and to deepen public awareness
of the archaeological process in Egypt will depend on professional planning and evaluation
within the SCA or in collaboration with foreign missions.
All forms of archaeological representation, which is the production of meaning through
a visual language of communicating the past, rely on the repetition of certain themes to
establish social legibility. Museums are one of archaeology’s most important media, adding a
material dimension to the visualization of history. By observing patterns in the arrangement
and composition of archaeological displays, museum exhibition can be read as a visual
narrative that negotiates ideological associations with the past.29
As a product of the European imperial age, Egypt’s early museography presented a
segregated Oriental history to a metropolitan audience of European scholars and travelers.
Colonial museum forms physically discriminated Pharaonic and Graeco-Roman from Coptic
and Islamic, with the implication that a ‘pure’ Egyptian culture lay in its classical heritage.
Fundamentally, Egyptian museum display is part of an encyclopedic tradition that uses
visual conventions to transmit information and construct meaning. Add to this historical
condition a centralized administration, a short supply of curatorial resources, a high national
illiteracy rate, a diverse international audience representing a multitude of languages, and the
conlicting interests of culture and tourism. The result (foreign inluence notwithstanding) is
a continued dependence on the visual or taxonomic relationship of objects to relate the story
of Egypt’s past. However, in the postcolonial-national tradition the boundaries instituted by
early museum forms have faded. New museum forms merge the ancient Egyptian, Graeco-
Roman, Byzantine, and Islamic traditions into an overlapping Egyptian identity that lengthens
29
See Bal (in Greenberg, Thinking about Exhibitions and in Preziosi and Farago, Grasping the World), Bennett
(Birth of the Museum and in Macdonald, Politics of Display), Dias (in Macdonald, Politics of Display), and Moser
(Wondrous Curiosities and in Hodder, Archaeological Theory Today).
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 13
the indigenous characterization to include the full span of Egyptian history. The new forms
suggest that these cultural traditions are signiicant not in isolation from, but in relation to
one another, as they share an essential ‘Egyptian-ness’.
Relatively few museums in Egypt are devoted exclusively to Pharaonic antiquity, and for
the most part, these are highly commercial museums attached to popular archaeological
sites. Apart from these, the transformation of the traditional narrative takes three forms. In
museums of archaeology, multiple periods of Egyptian history are presented simultaneously
and a full order of Egyptian history from the Neolithic to the 19th Century is common; ancient
themes underpin all modern museum subjects; and new forms of ethnographic display now
appear in conjunction with archaeology.
In the long narrative, prehistoric, early to late Dynastic, late antique, and Islamic materials
are typically presented in identical and repetitive terms, sometimes in a space with little barrier
or transition from one to the next. Exhibit compositions are based on a formal order and
classiication consisting irst of age, then form, then material. Exhibit form is based on
distinctions between major object taxa (monumental architecture, relief, statuary, and stelae)
and minor object taxa (ceramics, lithics, textiles, jewelry, igures., ostraca, papyri, and coins),
which relect disciplinary distinctions between art history and material culture. Material
sub-categories include ceramic, glass, ivory, bone, metal, wood, stone, etc. Centerpieces of
exhibits typically include highly recognizable or iconic items such as decorated predynastic
pottery, Pharaonic offering tables, Coptic scripture, and Islamic lanterns. Mummiication is
the only ubiquitously thematic archaeological exhibit and as a theme it supersedes all other
historical contexts. Displays associated with death and burial in ancient Egypt are always set
apart from a museum’s main exhibition with little attention to chronology. Writing and papyri
is another common theme, but in general thematic exhibits are still far less common than
taxonomic exhibits.
At the National Museum in Alexandria there are three loors of exhibition leading from
early to modern Egypt (ig. 13). Inside the entrance hall, an Islamic lantern hangs above a
Roman statue that leads visitors into the Pharaonic area. The exhibits begin on the lower
level in the Old Kingdom and continue through the Middle and New Kingdoms, the Late
Period, and the ‘Tomb.’ The period displays closely resemble one another, with seated igures,
offering tables, stelae, and iconic statuary situated among groups of decorated pottery,
ceramics, igurines, and jewelry. Located in a cellar-type room with a dark interior and low
lighting, the tomb display includes a Late Period mummy and cofin group, a large statue of
Anubis, and groupings of canopic jars, shabtis, amulets, and cartonnage. The Graeco-Roman
displays on the main loor feature a similar coniguration with large statues and mosaics
in the central gallery, and groups of pottery, stone, and metal artifacts, coins, masks, and
igurines around the periphery. A similar pattern occurs in the Coptic, Islamic, and Modern
displays on the upper level. The Coptic galleries feature several stelae among pottery, metal,
and textile groups, while the Islamic galleries feature large decorative objects (textile, stone,
and wood) among groups of coins, weapons, ceramics, glass, and metal artifacts. Historical
photographs line the Modern gallery, where the cases contain groups of coins, jewels, glass,
metal, and china. The form of each permanent exhibit is indistinguishable from the others,
and it is important to recognize this form as distinct from other types of temporary/thematic
displays. It superimposes a very material relationship between native cultures over the episodic
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
14 DOYON BMSAES 10
expression of each individual period, and it is this pattern that establishes the legibility of
Egyptian history.
The Antiquities Museum at the Library of Alexandria comprises ‘1079 objects that tell
the story of Egypt from the predynastic through the Islamic periods’30 (ig. 15). The ancient
displays begin with a group of scribal artifacts (statues, igures, and tools), followed by a
group of Old Kingdom alabaster vessels and display of New Kingdom limestone reliefs. In
the ‘Afterlife,’ a Roman mummy is displayed with an assortment of burial equipment from the
predynastic, New Kingdom, Late Period, and Ptolemaic traditions, and opposite the mummy
in the center of the gallery is an offering table. In an arterial sequence the Pharaonic area
leads into the Graeco-Roman, Byzantine, and Islamic exhibits and ultimately back to the
Pharaohs. Here again, each period closely resembles the next in its composition. Classical
statues appear in the middle of a large hall, surrounded by groups of Greek and Roman
coins, jewels, urns, igurines, amulets, metal tools, wood tools, and masks. In the next hall
are a Coptic lectern, Islamic prayer rug, and mashrabiya surrounded by Byzantine and then
Arabic arrangements including oil lamps, ceramics, ostraca, textiles, ivory, bone, and wood;
manuscripts, textiles, architecture, coins, lamps, writing instruments, ceramics, glass, metal,
and porcelain. A small exhibit of Hieroglyphic, Coptic, and Arabic papyri completes the
permanent exhibition.
At the Luxor Museum, despite its primary focus on New Kingdom Thebes there is one
central exhibit that traces the region from the predynastic through the Islamic era. This
exhibit brings together decorated predynastic pottery, early Dynastic divine igures, Old
Kingdom stoneware, Theban tomb furniture, Third Intermediate Period burial items, Late
Period and Ptolemaic offering tables, Coptic bronzes, and Mameluke ceramics, as well as
groups of linens, papyri, and mummiication materials.
The Nubia Museum’s permanent exhibition is based on a long chronology from prehistory
to the modern period with an added emphasis on folk culture. Beginning with Paleolithic tool
groups, the course of this museum visits Neolithic and predynastic Nubia, the Pyramid Age,
the Middle Kingdom, the Second Intermediate Period, the New Kingdom, the Late Period, the
Roman occupation, the Christian and Islamic periods, Nubia in the 20th Century, and inally,
contemporary folk life. Despite an emphasis on local chronology, the form is immediately
recognizable and as before each composition overlaps with the next. Major monuments and
cultural icons appear in the center of each gallery and analogous object classes line the edges.
With dioramas there is an effort to make the ethnographic tableaux more lifelike than the
preceding exhibits, but the themes and composition are consistent with the archaeological
displays. The overall effect is a loop in time, which blurs the difference between any given
“then” and now. Allegorically, there is no difference between a decorated jar from the 14th
Century AD and one from the 4th Millennium BC, or between a Middle Kingdom amulet and
one worn today, as they mirror each other across the galleries. Because the Nubia Museum
is both a tourist destination and a community-based museum, its ideological perspective is
signiicant. It suggests that the only way to view modern Egypt is by way of its past and
embodies the notion that Egyptian traditions, and thus identities, have less meaning apart
than together.
Other examples of this long narrative include the Beni Suef Museum (prehistoric to
30
From Bibliotheca Alexandrina Antiquities Museum, digital guide 2006.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 15
Islamic), the new el-Arish Museum (prehistoric to modern, including folk), the Islamic
Ceramics Museum (Islamic, modern, and contemporary), the New Valley Museum (prehistoric
to late antique), and the Aswan Museum (prehistoric to Islamic). Ever more inclusive, this
narrative transposes the remote and recent pasts to create an identity that is larger than any
single part. To this end, the new National Museum of Egyptian Civilization proposes to
integrate all Egyptian cultures from prehistory to the present into a shared space of meaning,
where ‘Egypt’s cultural unity precedes its political unity’.31
Representations of antiquity also grant an indigenous signiicance to secular history,
and in this they signify a national identity that draws its legitimacy from the ancient past.
Impressions of ancient Egypt appear in every modern museum subject from the military to
the arts. These typically include replicas, models, graphics, and other art forms, and in many
cases they include authentic objects; most focus on Pharaonic subjects and some include
classical and Islamic themes. Common representations of ancient Egypt focus on divinity
and kingship, writing, mummiication, agriculture, and military themes.
Some examples include the Railway and Postal Museums, which have historical sections
on communication and transportation stretching back to the First Dynasty (ig. 8). The
Geological Museum has an exhibit on minerals and their uses in ancient Egypt, and the
hunting museum at Manyal Palace displays a large illustration of prehistoric hunters in its
entryway. The Entomological Museum has a case of insects from the tomb of Tutankhamun
and the Military Museum in Cairo has one of his chariots, which is prominently displayed as
a point of origin for the Egyptian military.
The Agricultural Museum is a study unto itself, incorporating both true specimens and
casts from antiquity throughout its several museums and hundreds of exhibits, which cover
the arts and ethnography, lora, fauna, and history of Egypt. In spite of the disrepair of some
of its halls it is a relatively dynamic local museum that presents an encyclopedic history of
Egyptian agriculture from its origins in prehistory to the present day, including two dedicated
museums of archaeology and two neo-Pharaonic gardens. The irst and newer ancient
Egyptian museum is a complete and culturally sophisticated natural history covering the pre-
to late Dynastic, and the second deals with the agricultural traditions of late antique and
Islamic Egypt. The detailed execution of this museum in particular, with its emphasis on the
antiquity of the land and its agriculture, suggests something more actual than Pharaonism.
Among its various references to antiquity, the Abdin Palace Museum features a modern
king list that begins with Narmer and ends with Mubarak (ig. 14). The selection, dimensions,
and coniguration of leaders represented in this image are a local history of Egypt, wherein
the nation’s independence is aggrandized by its heritage. Sixty percent of the number,
and half the visual balance, of individuals chosen are indigenous Egyptian Pharaohs, and
Tutankhamun, who represents both ancient and modern Egypt, is the literal center of the
narrative. The history represented by this account poetically joins the independent present to
the indigenous past.
Representations of ancient Egypt have long been used to support the political agendas
of Western nations, and to provide a romantic and exotic counterpart to Western cultures
and societies. For the past two centuries Egypt’s indigenous history has issued from Western
disciplines and museums of Egyptology, which have traditionally neglected their subject’s
31
el-Moniem, Museum International 225-226: 25.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
16 DOYON BMSAES 10
relationship to modern Egypt. In the various ways explored in this paper, the postcolonial
museum tradition in Egypt has itself deined that relationship as an inclusive identity that
replaces the exclusive ‘Egyptian-ness’ granted to Pharaonic Egypt by European colonial
interests. By allowing all Egyptian traditions to act as relections of one another rather than
disparate, linear segments, Egypt has redeined and reclaimed its indigenous heritage for a
diversiied and increasingly local audience.
Bibliography
Abt, J., ‘The Origins of the Public Museum’, in Macdonald, S. (ed.), A Companion to Museum
Studies, Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 115–34.
Bal, M., ‘The Discourse of the Museum’, in Greenberg, R., et al. (eds.), Thinking about Exhibitions,
London: Routledge, 1996, 201–18.
Bal, M., ‘Telling Objects: A Narrative Perspective on Collecting’, in Preziosi, D. and Farago,
C. (eds), Grasping the World: The Idea of the Museum, Hants: Ashgate, 2004, 84–102.
Baligh, R., ‘Museum Education in Egypt and the World’, Bulletin of the Egyptian Museum 2
(2005), 23–8.
Bennett, T., The Birth of the Museum: history, theory, politics. London: Routledge, 1995.
Bennett, T., ‘Speaking to the Eyes: Museums, legibility and the social order’, in Macdonald, S.
(ed.), The Politics of Display: Museums, science, culture, London: Routledge, 1998, 25–35.
Bibliotheca Alexandrina, Annual Report July 2004-June 2005. Alexandria: Bibliotheca
Alexandrina, 2005.
Bohrer, F. N., ‘Inventing Assyria: Exoticism and Reception in Nineteenth-Century England
and France’, in Preziosi, D. and Farago, C. (eds.), Grasping the World: The Idea of the Museum,
Hants: Ashgate, 2004, 191–226.
Conn, S., Museums and American Intellectual Life, 1876-1926. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1998.
Coombes, A. ‘Museums and the Formation of National and Cultural Identities’, in Preziosi,
D. and Farago, C. (eds.), Grasping the World: The Idea of the Museum, Hants: Ashgate, 2004,
278–97.
Délié, H., and Béchard, É., ‘Planche 2 Vues Pittoresques’, in Mariette, A., Album du Musée de
Boulaq, Cairo: Mourès & Cie, 1872, 17. From Travelers in the Middle East Archive,
http://hdl.handle.net/1911/10225 (accessed 20 August 2008).
Délié, H., and Béchard, É., ‘Planche 3 Vues Pittoresques’, in Mariette, A., Album du Musée de
Boulaq, Cairo: Mourès & Cie, 1872, 21. From Travelers in the Middle East Archive,
http://hdl.handle.net/1911/10226 (accessed 20 August 2008).
Dias, N., ‘The Visibility of Difference: Nineteenth-century French anthropological collections’.
In Macdonald, S. (ed.), The Politics of Display: Museums, science, culture, London: Routledge,
1998, 36–52.
Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, ‘Annual Statement of the Arrangement of Principal
and Rural National Museums by Income 2001-2002’, Cairo, Ministry of Culture, Supreme
Council of Antiquities, Museums Sector, Department of Planning and Implementation,
signed 21 August 2002.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 17
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
18 DOYON BMSAES 10
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 19
Table 1: An Egyptian chronology. To 642 AD, chronology follows Redford (Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient
Egypt).
PERIOD DATES
Prehistoric c.700,000-3050 BC
Paleolithic / Mesolithic c.700,000-5500
Neolithic / Predynastic c.5500-3050
Badarian 5500-4000
Naqada I 4000-3500
Naqada II 3500-3150
Dynasty “0” c.3150-3050
Pharaonic c.3050-333 BC
Early Dynastic (Dynasties 1-2) c.3050-2687
Old Kingdom (Dynasties 3-6) c.2687-2191
First Intermediate Period (Dynasties 7-11) c.2190-2061
Middle Kingdom (Dynasties 11-14) 2061-c.1665
Second Intermediate Period (Dynasties 15-17) c.1664-1569
New Kingdom (Dynasties 18-20) c.1569-1081
Third Intermediate Period (Dynasties 21-23) 1081-c.711
Late Period (Dynasties 24-31) 724-333
Graeco-Roman 332 BC-337 AD
Macedonian 332-305 BC
Ptolemaic 305-31 BC
Roman 30 BC - 337 AD
Byzantine (‘Coptic’) 337-641 AD
Islamic 642-1798 AD
Ummayyad Caliphate 661-750
Abbasid Caliphate 750-969
Tulunid Dynasty 868-905
Ikhshidi Dynasty 935-969
Fatimid Caliphate 969-1171
Ayyubid Sultanate 1171-1252
Mameluke Sultanate 1252-1517
Ottoman Rule 1517-1914
Modern 1798 AD-
French Occupation 1798-1801
Dynasty of Mohammed Ali Pasha 1805-1892
British Occupation 1882-1952
Semi-independence 1922-1952
Arab Republic of Egypt 1953-
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
20 DOYON BMSAES 10
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 21
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
22 DOYON BMSAES 10
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 23
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
24 DOYON BMSAES 10
MUSEUM ADMINISTRATION
1) 23rd July Revolution Museum Presidential (governing)/Ministry of Culture SFA (curatorial)
2) Abdin Palace Museum Presidential (governing)/Ministry of Culture SCA (curatorial)
3-9) Agricultural Museum(s) Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Museums Supervisor
10) Ahmed Shawqi Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
11) El-Alamein Museum n/a
12) El-Arish Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
13-14) Aswan Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
Annex German Institute of Archaeology (curatorial)
15) El-Bahariya Oasis Heritage Museum Private
16) Bedouin Heritage Museum Matrouh Association of Visitors to the Cultural Houses in Matrouh
17-18) Beni Suef Museum(s) Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
19-21) Bibliotheca Alexandrina Board of Trustees
Antiquities Museum Ministry of Culture SCA (curatorial)
Manuscripts Museum Library
Science Museum French Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers
(curatorial)
22) Botanical Museum Ministry of Agriculture, Horticultural Research Institute
23) Carriage Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
24) Cavafy Museum Greek Embassy in Cairo
25) Chariots Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
26) Coptic Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
27) Dar el-Kutub Museum n/a
28) Denshoway Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
29) Education Museum n/a
30) Effat Nagy and Saad el-Khadem Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
Museum
31) Egyptian Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
32) Enji Alatoun Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
33) Entomological Museum Ministry of Social Affairs (governing)/Entomological Society
of Egypt (curatorial)
34) Ethnographic Museum n/a (governing)/Geographical Society (curatorial)
35) El-Farafra Museum Private
36) Gawhara Palace Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
37) Gayer-Anderson Museum Ministry of Culture SCA (governing)/British Mission to the
Gayer-Anderson (curatorial)
38) Geological Museum Ministry of Petroleum, Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority
39) Gezira Art Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
40) Graeco-Roman Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
41) Grand Egyptian Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 25
MUSEUM ADMINISTRATION
42) Hassan Heshmat Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
43) Hassan Tobar Museum n/a
44) Hurghada Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
45) Hygiene Museum Ministry of Public Works
) Imhotep Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
47) Islamic Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
48) Islamic Ceramics Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
49) Ismailia Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
50) Kafr el-Sheikh Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
51) Kom Ombo Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
52) Kom Oushim Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
53) Luxor Museum of Ancient Egyptian Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
Art
54) Mahmoud Khalil Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
55) Mahmoud Said Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
56) Mallawi Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
57) Mansoura Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
58) Manyal Palace Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
59) Marine Life Museum Alexandria n/a
60) Marine Life Museum Hurghada n/a
61) Merenptah Temple Site Museum Ministry of Culture SCA (governing)/Swiss Institute for
Archaeology (curatorial)
62) Military Museum Cairo Ministry of Defense
63) Military Museum Port Said n/a
64) El-Minya Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
65) Modern Art Museum Alexandria Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
) Modern Art Museum Cairo Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
67) Modern Art Museum Port Said Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
68) Mohammed Abd el-Wahab Museum Ministry of Culture, Cairo Opera House
69) Mohammed Nagy Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
70) Mohammed Waheed-Eddin Selim Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
71) Mostafa Kamel Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
72) Mukhtar Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
73) Mummiication Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
74) National Museum Alexandria Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
75) National Museum Mansoura Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
76) National Museum of Egyptian Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
Civilization
77) Naval Museum Alexandria Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
(Museums Sector Directorate)
78) New Valley Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
79) Nubia Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
26 DOYON BMSAES 10
MUSEUM ADMINISTRATION
80) Nubian Heritage Museum Nubian Heritage Preservation Association
81) October 1973 War Panorama n/a
82) People’s Assembly Museum Egyptian People‘s Assembly
83) Police Museum Cairo Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
84) Port Said Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
85) Postal Museum Cairo Ministry of Communications, National Mail Service
86) Qasr el-Aini Museum Cairo University, Faculty of Medicine
87) Qena Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
88) Quseir Fort Visitors Center Ministry of Culture SCA (governing)/
American Research Center in Egypt (curatorial)
89) Railways Museum Cairo Ministry of Transport
90) Rashid Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
91) Rokn Helwan Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
92) Romel’s’ss Cave Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
93) Royal Jewelry Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
94) Saad Zaghloul Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
95) San el-Hagar Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
96) Seized Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
97) Sharm el-Sheikh Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
98) Shoubra Palace Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
99) Sinai Heritage Museum Sinai Heritage Museum Association
100) Siwa House Museum n/a
101) Sohag Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
102) Solar Boat Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
(Museums Sector Directorate)
103) Suez Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
104) Taba Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
105) Taha Hussein Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
106) Tanta Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
107) Tell el-Amarna Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
108) Tor Sinai Museum n/a
109) Umm Kalthoum Museum n/a
110) University Museum Cairo University
111) Wax Museum Ministry of Culture, Sector of Fine Arts
112) Zagazig Museum Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 27
ANTIQUITIES MUSEUMS
National (Principal) 14) Qena Museum
1) Coptic Museum 15) San el-Hagar Museum
2) Egyptian Museum 16) Sharm el-Sheikh Museum
3) Graeco-Roman Museum 17) Sohag Museum
4) Islamic Museum 18) Suez Museum
5) National Museum Alexandria 19) Taba Museum
6) National Museum of Egyptian Civilization 20) Tanta Museum
Regional (Local) 21) Tell el-Amarna Museum
1) El-Arish Museum Site / Other
2) Aswan Museum 1) Aswan Museum, Annex
3-4) Beni Suef Museum(s) 2) Bibliotheca Alexandrina Antiquities Museum
5) Hurghada Museum 3) Grand Egyptian Museum
6) Ismailia Museum ) Imhotep Museum
7) Kafr el-Sheikh Museum 5) Kom Ombo Museum
8) Kom Oushim Museum 6) Luxor Museum of Ancient Egyptian Art
9) Mallawi Museum 7) Merenptah Temple Site Museum
10) Mansoura Museum 8) Mummiication Museum
11) El-Minya Museum 9) Nubia Museum
12) New Valley Museum 10) Quseir Fort Visitors Center
13) Port Said Museum 11) Solar Boat Museum
HISTORICAL MUSEUMS
1) Abdin Palace Museum 9) Rashid Museum
2) Carriage Museum 10) Rokn Helwan Museum
3) Chariots Museum 11) Romel‘s Cave
4) Gawhara Palace Museum 12) Royal Jewelry Museum
5) Gayer-Anderson Museum 13) Seized Museum
6) Manyal Palace Museum 14) Shoubra Palace Museum
7) Naval Museum 15) Zagazig Museum
8) Police Museum
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
28 DOYON BMSAES 10
ARTS MUSEUMS
Biography 3) Mahmoud Khalil Museum
1) Effat Nagy and Saad al-Khadem Museum ) Mahmoud Said Museum
2) Enji Alatoun Museum 5) Modern Art Museum Alexandria (Hussein Sobhi)
3) Hassan Heshmat Museum ) Modern Art Museum Cairo
4) Mohammed Nagy Museum 7) Modern Art Museum Port Said (el-Nasr)
Fine Arts 8) Mohammed Waheed-Eddin Selim Museum
1) Gezira Art Museum 9) Mukhtar Museum
2) Islamic Ceramics Museum
NATIONAL-HISTORICAL MUSEUMS
1) 23rd July Revolution Museum 5) National Museum Mansoura
2) Ahmed Shawqi Museum 6) Saad Zaghloul Museum
3) Denshoway Museum 7) Taha Hussein Museum
4) Mostafa Kamel Museum 8) Wax Museum
MINISTRY OF CULTURE
|
CULTURAL ADMINISTRATION
Director General Secretary General
SECTOR OF FINE ARTS SUPREME COUNCIL OF ANTIQUITIES
|
MUSEUMS ADMINISTRATION
Technical Support for Museums and Exhibitions Museums Sector
|
MUSEUM MANAGEMENT
Arts Museums (13) Antiquities Museums (38)
National Historical Museums (8) Historical Museums (15)
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 29
Table 7: Museum visitors (SCA museums, iscal years 2001-2004). Egyptian Supreme
Council of Antiquities, Statements 2002, 2003, 2005
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
30 DOYON BMSAES 10
Table 8: Museum revenue (SCA, iscal years 2001-2004), in USD (estimated at LE 5.75 = 1 USD). Egyptian
Supreme Council of Antiquities, Statements 2002, 2003, 2005.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 31
Table 9: Luxor Museum visitor proile (2003-2004). Luxor Museum, visitor records January 2006.
Table 10: Luxor Museum revenue proile (2003-2004), in USD (estimated at LE 5.75 = 1 USD). Luxor
Museum, records January 2006.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
32 DOYON BMSAES 10
Fig. 1: Salle du centre (nef principale) at the Boulaq Fig. 2: Salle du centre (nef latérale) at the Boulaq
Museum in Cairo, 1872 [Délié and Béchard Museum in Cairo, 1872 [Délié and Béchard
from Travelers in the Middle East Archive, from Travelers in the Middle East Archive,
http://hdl.handle.net/1911/10225]. http://hdl.handle.net/1911/10226].
Fig. 3: Plan of the Boulaq Museum in Cairo, 1883 Fig. 4: Gallery of Egyptian gods at the Egyptian
[Maspero from Travelers in the Middle East Museum in Cairo, 2006.
Archive, http://hdl.handle.net/1911/9182].
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 33
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
34 DOYON BMSAES 10
Fig. 7: Gallery of tools and implements at the Egyptian Museum in Cairo, 2006.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 35
Fig. 10: International visitor trends at the Luxor Museum, 2003, 2004.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx
36 DOYON BMSAES 10
Fig. 11: Private museum tour at the Egyptian Museum in Cairo, 2006.
Fig. 12: Public museum tour at the Abdin Palace Museum in Cairo, 2006.
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/Doyon.aspx
2008 EGYPTIAN MUSEUM PRACTICE 37
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/online_journals/bmsaes/issue_10/doyon.aspx