Cae Evtol Advanced Air Mobility Report 2021
Cae Evtol Advanced Air Mobility Report 2021
Cae Evtol Advanced Air Mobility Report 2021
for Advanced
Air Mobility
CAE 2021 Report
Table of contents
3 Introduction
14 Conclusion
Cover page: Photo courtesy of Jaunt Air Mobility LLC, Joby Aero Inc, Lilium Schweiz GmbH and Volocopter GmbH
1
Airline and Business Jet Pilot Demand Outlook — 10-year view (2020 update).
https://www.cae.com/cae-pilot-demand-outlook-2020/
2
Pelli, Uri; Riedel, Robin; “Flying-cab drivers wanted” ( June 2, 2020).
https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/flying-cab-drivers-wanted
3
Pope, Talon M., "A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Pilot Training Next" (March 21, 2019). Theses and Dissertations. 2314.
https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/2314
At the onset, a day in the life of an eVTOL pilot will Congested air space
look similar to today’s pilots who conduct commercial,
on-demand or scheduled operations. These aircraft Initial operations of eVTOL aircraft will be conducted
will likely be serviced at a base of operations located in national airspace systems sharing airspace with
on an airport, heliport or vertiport. Pilots will receive other aircraft operations, potentially on existing heli-
their daily taskings from their operations department copter routes or, in some cases, on early pre-defined
or flight dispatchers. They will review weather Notices flight corridors through specific authorizations. As
to Airmen (NOTAMs), and maintenance records. Pilots the demand increases, we can expect more and more
will verify the aircraft readiness for flight and ensure aircraft flying along similar pathways, simultaneously,
batteries are in a proper state of charge for the initial and layered with other commercial air traffic. Pilots
flight. The pilot in command will pre-flight the aircraft will encounter busy radio transmissions in high density
and depart on their assigned tasking for the day, trans- airspace and must learn to manage communications
porting passengers or cargo from points A to B. with more agility than conventional aircraft operations.
Pilots will also need to become capable of managing
Several aspects of these operations will differ from flights that are closer in proximity to other vehicles, and
traditional aviation operations, and these will need to to be alert and react should other aircraft deviate from
be reflected in pilot training. the planned course. It will be critical for flight simulator
training devices (FSTDs) to have immersive environ-
Short cycles ments populated with air traffic, whether AI-generated
or linked to other trainees in FSTDs 4, simulating the chal-
Many of these missions will be short in duration (5-30 lenges of congested airspace.
minutes) and pilots will transition quickly and often in
and out of critical phases of flight. While eVTOL vehicles Urban environment
are being optimized to simplify pilot workload, the
critical phases of flight (takeoffs and landings) make Off-airport takeoffs and landings will likely occur in
up a larger portion of a flight operation than a typical confined, intra-city helipad/vertiport locations and
commercial or business aircraft flight operation. An on top of high-rise buildings as the industry matures.
eVTOL pilot could experience 2-4 critical phases of flight Performing emergency procedures in these environ-
per hour rather than 2-4 critical phases of flight per day. ments is a high-risk operation. With no clear path to
Take offs, landings, and transitions have not been fully divert, the pilot will need to make judgement calls on the
automated for the majority of these aircraft, so training safest alternative course or landing site, considering the
will need to account for fatigue management in these busy air space, the battery life, and aircraft limitations.
high cycles of operation. Coupling this with local urban and microclimate weather
conditions and communication-blackout zones means
pilots will face new and unique challenges in training
for situational awareness in urban environments. These
types of training elements cannot be taught safely in a
training aircraft, as the risk is too high to perform emer-
gency procedure training in over populated areas at low
altitudes. Training organizations will need to leverage
modern training devices that are built on physics-based
simulation that incorporates microclimate events and
near building/ground effects.
4
Connecting simulators for conducting real-time platform-level wargaming across multiple host computers is commonly used worldwide in military organizations
but has also been used in the field of medicine.
This includes the development of the syllabus, course- The majority of these aircraft will be operated by a
ware, and training equipment. These programs must single pilot and have a single set of flight controls.
be reviewed and approved by CAAs before any non- Current regulations require in-aircraft instruction with
experimental pilot training can take place – a precursor fully functioning dual controls. Aircraft that have been
to operators building the first cadre of pilots to operate approved for single pilot operation, (ex: Hondajet,
these vehicles. Phenom-100/300, M2, etc) leverage training in the
aircraft that are equipped with full dual controls. OEMs
The novel nature of eVTOL aircraft (electric propulsion may consider a training version of the aircraft equipped
systems, varying control schemes and pilot interfaces) with dual controls to enable flight training in the aircraft.
will result in OEMs facing additional challenges in devel- Exceptions could be pursued for eVTOL designs where
oping training programs that meet the approval criteria the configuration allows a second pilot seat, provided
of CAAs. This will require early engagement with regula- that it could be demonstrated to CAAs that the instructor
tors, training device manufacturers, and training organi- has full flight controls, and the flight may be conducted
zations to meet publicly forecasted business timelines. safely. The expense and time to achieve additional certi-
fication of such dual-controlled aircraft may be unac-
Currently, the regulatory requirements for eVTOL pilot ceptable for OEMs.
training and aircrew licensing have not been defined.
Early entrants into the market will need to rely on The alternative to conventional training in the aircraft
existing regulations with added special conditions. The could be a zero-flight time training (ZFTT) approval of a
onus will be on OEMs to demonstrate a data- or process- simulator-based training program. A pilot who has gone
driven approach to training program design. through a ZFTT program can fly revenue-generating
flights without having prior in-aircraft experience. ZFTT
This in and of itself is a challenge, as the number of pilots approval requires a qualified simulator with Level C or
that have flown eVTOL aircraft, at the time of this writing, Level D fidelity and is directly tied to the AOC’s training
is extremely limited, specifically to flight test pilots only. program approval. It is commonplace in the fixed wing
Subject matter expert (SME) inputs are needed when world to use Level C or D simulators within a ZFTT
making definitive decisions regarding training programs. program. This is not the case in the rotorcraft world
The industry can make certain assumptions based on where, under EASA and CASA, an AOC pilot training
existing pilot training programs and engineering inputs. program may be approved for trainees to complete
Will this be sufficient when the aircraft deviate so far most of the training, including the check-ride, in a simu-
from what is presently in production and type certifi- lator, but where the pilot is still required to demonstrate
cated? For example, will these aircraft with simplified take-offs and landings in an actual aircraft thereafter.
vehicle operations, lacking turbine engines, require
simulators with motion cueing capability for representa-
tive training? SME feedback from manned flight experi-
ences and from the experiences of test pilots of eVTOL
aircraft will be valuable. These SMEs are critical for the
development of pilot training, including the design and
qualification of training equipment.
5
Simulation features comprise of: cockpit layout & structure; flight model; ground handling; aircraft systems; flight controls & forces; sound cues; visual cues; motion;
cues; environment – ATC; environment – navigation; environment – weather; environment – airports & terrain.
Bringing a new aircraft to market requires enormous The use of high-fidelity simulation has a proven and
capital and is very time consuming. Errors, if only discov- successful track record in helicopters, business aviation,
ered in the flight test phase, can set the program back and the commercial aircraft industry. OEMs pursuing
significantly, both in time and cash burn. high-fidelity simulation and concurrent simulator devel-
opment early in their certification efforts may provide
Across disciplines, simulation is widely used to rapidly significant overall cost savings, as well as significantly
iterate and optimize designs. As an example of its use accelerating the timeline for the training simulator
in aviation, Airbus leveraged a high-fidelity engineering certification.
simulator to compress the flight test schedule for the
A350XWB aircraft in half, spanning just 12 months, by Why is this important? The prototype simulator certifi-
moving many certification tasks upstream and receiving cation process can range from 16 months to 24 months,
credit for time flown in the Integrated System Test/ depending on the simulator specifications and the
Certification Rigs (ISTCR) in support of flight testing. completeness of an OEM’s aircraft data. Missing data or
model inaccuracy can significantly shift the scope and
Acceptance of high-fidelity engineering simulators structure of a simulator program. Importantly, a delay to
(ESims) and hardware-in-the-loop ISTCR serve to gain the training equipment program certification will delay
credit toward type certification for procedures “flown” the type certification of the aircraft and, if not careful,
on the ground. The use of ESims to find and fix integra- can delay the critical path to entry into service (EiS).
tion issues and to demonstrate failure modes provides
value in the certification process. ESims allow for human
factors assessment and acceleration of the cockpit
design. ISTCRs reduce flight time and systems testing,
with the added value that edge of envelop tests can
be performed with sufficient repeatability and without
putting the safety of test pilots at risk.
To achieve vehicle Type Certification, an OEM must It is essential that courseware and simulators be avail-
first conduct an Operational Evaluation (OE). This is a able ahead of the OE to support a timely EiS. New entrant
process where regulators evaluate all aspects of the aircraft can’t begin operations and generate revenue if
operational program to ensure safety. This includes the pilot training program isn’t approved, and certifi-
post-aircraft delivery aspects such as manuals, pilot cated pilots are not available to operate these aircraft.
training programs, training equipment, etc. This means
that every aircraft manufacturer, conventional or eVTOL,
must have a team focused on the pilot training require-
ments in advance of Type Certification.
Traditional pilot training is task- or qualification-based: Data gathered from pilot performance in a CBTA
its goal is meeting the regulatory requirements of the program will serve to evaluate the quality of the training
CAA. These regulations prescribe specific training program. By grouping pilot core behaviors into “Pilot
program inputs (e.g., hours of study, hours of practice, Competencies”, pilots and instructors have a relatable
etc.), to meet a CAA’s testing criteria and qualification context to discuss training performance. Observable
criteria. behaviors are modeled behaviors for a given compe-
tency allowing the pilot to better understand how
The new AAM industry is pushing regulators to use the putting the Pilot Competencies into practice results in
present re-examination of standards as an opening to safety of operations. CBTA is intended to have a more
adopt fresh training concepts. An opportunity exists wholistic approach to training and assessment of pilot
to center training around pilot competencies (the performance, compared to traditional task or qualifi-
outcome of training), rather than prescriptive models cation-based training. The inclusion of scenario-based
(the inputs of training). A Competency-Based Training training (following the competency-based format) in
and Assessment (CBTA) approach is a potential solution pilot training activities has proven to reinforce resilience
to harmonizing eVTOL pilot training across a wide range in pilot decision making, leading to safe and consistent
of aircraft designs and with an easier path to adoption outcomes.
by multiple regulators. The desired result will ensure
approvals for timely and global eVTOL aircraft opera- Following the CBTA process may provide a cost-
tional integration. effective, safe, and comprehensive means to develop
a pilot training program where a gap currently exists.
Following a Competency Based Training Assessment The development of such a training program may help
(CBTA) approach to training program design, serves to recommend industry consensus standards and a
several purposes for the eVTOL industry. First, it path forward for operation of eVTOL aircraft in global
follows a globally accepted set of pragmatic workflows markets. Creating an eVTOL Pilot Training Program,
which identify the necessary pilot knowledge, skills, customizable for the uniqueness of aircraft design, will
and attitudes to validate the tasks necessary to safely help OEMs speed their aircraft into service.
operate an aircraft6. This will provide the framework
for a successful and efficient pilot training program to
transition a currently certificated pilot with a rotorcraft
or airplane rating to eVTOL proficiency. Additionally,
the core of CBTA is defining assessment criteria to
monitor pilot performance and gather data regarding
the effectiveness of the training to determine what may
need to be revised to enable a continuous improvement
cycle. This is essential to any new aircraft pilot training
program.
Currently, no “off-the-shelf" eVTOL solution for pilot This process will involve numerous stakeholders: OEMs,
training exists. The challenge of evolving vehicle designs regulators, training equipment manufacturers, and the
and the fact that there is little operational flight data training program developer.
along with rapidly evolving technologies creates ambi-
guity around the pathway to regulatory compliance. CAE CAE has already completed Step 1 and, in collaboration
recognizes a path forward to a unified approach that with our vehicle partners and industry working groups,
could harmonize the industry. is launching activities to establish a generic task list that
would support industry-wide decisions on the general
The seven-step model below may support a pathway to pilot competencies required for these aircraft of the
regulatory approval and certainty in determining appro- future.
priate pilot training devices and pilot training program
structure.
1 3 5 7
Data Document Risk Go!
and science the difference assessment
2 4 6
Leverage Determine Develop
a standard best way industry
and determine to train consensus
what applies tasks standards
1. Find scientific articles, 3. Once commercial tasks 5. Risk assess tasks, training 7. Launch development
research and data to vali- are filtered by applica- devices and determine of training curriculum,
date recommendations bility, define a generic suitable mitigation. materials and training
for training technologies eVTOL task list. devices. Ongoing work
and approaches. on certification and opera-
6. Regulatory agencies,
tional evaluation.
4. Refine eVTOL task list OEMs, ATOs and other
2. Benchmark legacy with input from OEM and stakeholders develop
commercial regulatory industry stakeholders. standards and have these
standards of airplane, Develop matrix on what standards accepted by
rotorcraft and UAS for device is recommended to regulators.
eVTOL applicability and train the tasks.
training gap-analysis.
About CAE
CAE is a high technology company, at
the leading edge of digital immersion,
providing solutions to make the world
a safer place. Backed by a record of
more than 70 years of industry firsts,
we continue to reimagine the customer
experience and revolutionize training
and operational support solutions in
civil aviation, defence and security, and
healthcare. We are the partner of choice
to customers worldwide who operate in
complex, high-stakes and largely regu-
lated environments, where successful
outcomes are critical. Testament to our
customers’ ongoing needs for our solu-
tions, over 60 percent of CAE’s revenue
is recurring in nature. We have the
broadest global presence in our industry,
with approximately 10,000 employees,
160 sites and training locations in over
35 countries.
www.cae.com