Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Reliability: Notes

    Uploaded by

    Evanda Manggani
    The document reports the results of a reliability analysis of ratings from 5 raters (Rater1-Rater5) on 7 cases. It finds very good reliability between the raters, with Cronbach's alpha of .922 and average measures ICC of .911, indicating high agreement between the raters. The ICC analysis also confirms high reliability, with a single rater ICC of .671 and average measures ICC of .911, and all ICCs are statistically significant at p<.001.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Reliability: Notes

    Uploaded by

    Evanda Manggani
    18 views3 pages
    The document reports the results of a reliability analysis of ratings from 5 raters (Rater1-Rater5) on 7 cases. It finds very good reliability between the raters, with Cronbach's alpha of .922 and average measures ICC of .911, indicating high agreement between the raters. The ICC analysis also confirms high reliability, with a single rater ICC of .671 and average measures ICC of .911, and all ICCs are statistically significant at p<.001.

    Original Description:

    pp

    Original Title

    Mau

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document reports the results of a reliability analysis of ratings from 5 raters (Rater1-Rater5) on 7 cases. It finds very good reliability between the raters, with Cronbach's alpha of .922 and average measures ICC of .911, indicating high agreement between the raters. The ICC analysis also confirms high reliability, with a single rater ICC of .671 and average measures ICC of .911, and all ICCs are statistically significant at p<.001.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    18 views3 pages

    Reliability: Notes

    Uploaded by

    Evanda Manggani
    The document reports the results of a reliability analysis of ratings from 5 raters (Rater1-Rater5) on 7 cases. It finds very good reliability between the raters, with Cronbach's alpha of .922 and average measures ICC of .911, indicating high agreement between the raters. The ICC analysis also confirms high reliability, with a single rater ICC of .671 and average measures ICC of .911, and all ICCs are statistically significant at p<.001.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    RELIABILITY

    /VARIABLES=Rater1 Rater2 Rater3 Rater4 Rater5


    /SCALE('ALL VARIABLES') ALL
    /MODEL=ALPHA
    /STATISTICS=DESCRIPTIVE SCALE
    /SUMMARY=MEANS
    /ICC=MODEL(MIXED) TYPE(ABSOLUTE) CIN=95 TESTVAL=0.

    Reliability

    Notes

    Output Created 09-Sep-2023 14:55:43


    Comments
    Input Active Dataset DataSet0
    Filter <none>
    Weight <none>
    Split File <none>
    N of Rows in Working Data File 7
    Matrix Input
    Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as
    missing.
    Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases with valid
    data for all variables in the procedure.
    Syntax RELIABILITY
    /VARIABLES=Rater1 Rater2 Rater3 Rater4
    Rater5
    /SCALE('ALL VARIABLES') ALL
    /MODEL=ALPHA
    /STATISTICS=DESCRIPTIVE SCALE
    /SUMMARY=MEANS
    /ICC=MODEL(MIXED) TYPE(ABSOLUTE)
    CIN=95 TESTVAL=0.

    Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.078

    Elapsed Time 00:00:00.069

    [DataSet0]
    Scale: ALL VARIABLES

    Case Processing Summary

    N %

    Cases Valid 7 100.0

    Excludeda 0 .0

    Total 7 100.0

    a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the


    procedure.

    Reliability Statistics

    Cronbach's Alpha
    Based on
    Cronbach's Alpha Standardized Items N of Items

    .922 .927 5

    Item Statistics

    Mean Std. Deviation N

    Rater1 2.71 .951 7


    Rater2 2.86 1.069 7
    Rater3 3.14 .690 7
    Rater4 3.43 .787 7
    Rater5 3.00 1.000 7

    Summary Item Statistics

    Maximum /
    Mean Minimum Maximum Range Minimum Variance N of Items

    Item Means 3.029 2.714 3.429 .714 1.263 .076 5

    Scale Statistics

    Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

    15.14 15.810 3.976 5


    Intraclass Correlation Coefficient

    Intraclass 95% Confidence Interval F Test with True Value 0


    a
    Correlation Lower Bound Upper Bound Value df1 df2 Sig

    Single Measures .671b .367 .917 12.893 6 24 .000


    c
    Average Measures .911 .743 .982 12.893 6 24 .000

    Two-way mixed effects model where people effects are random and measures effects are fixed.
    a. Type A intraclass correlation coefficients using an absolute agreement definition.
    b. The estimator is the same, whether the interaction effect is present or not.
    c. This estimate is computed assuming the interaction effect is absent, because it is not estimable otherwise.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy