Airworthiness Review Template
Airworthiness Review Template
Use the information in this template to construct your ARC review control document
Reference Number
Operator or owner:
Registration:
Serial number:
Aircraft type:
Total time:
Total cycle:
Engine type:
#1
#2
#3
#4
Propeller type
#1
#2
#3
#4
AMP reference
1st
2nd
Is this AMO assisting the ARC signatory in accordance with M.A. 710 (b)?
Licence No
From Date
To Date
From TLP No
To TLP No
EASA Bi-Weekly
EASA
Emergency
Conformity
Information
State of Design
State of Registry
Accomplished as Required?
(Terminating Action/Repeat/NA)
Details
Does current Flight Manual reflect correct status (check also appendix)
Details
Details
From Date
To Date
Deferred maintenance details check control and transfer (technical log or next SMI)
Identify Next scheduled Maintenance Inspection
Date
Hours Due
Review EASA Form 1s (or equivalent – 8130-3 ) sampled and found satisfactory for
eligibility, correct wording and, where applicable, dual release?
Sampled component information correctly entered onto the component record system?
Work correctly certified and by approved staff in accordance with maintenance organisation
procedures?
Changes and Repairs (including Service Bulletins) possible need to verify during Physical
Survey where applicable
Date
Accomplished by
FAA Form 8110 or 8100-9; Airbus RAS or other approval available for permanent
repairs?
Any effect on operational considerations such as RVSM, ETOPS or AWOPS?
Life-Limited Parts - possible need to verify during Physical Survey where applicable
Verify component due forecast - Sampled LLPs are identified, recorded and have not
exceeded approved service life?
Details:
Exporting state:
Current registration:
Importing state:
Allocated registration:
When completing the checklist below, please add corresponding details and attach
supporting documents.
Has the operator applied to the EU Member State Competent Authority for
the necessary Certificate of Airworthiness and paid the required fee?
Has the exporting state’s regulator issued the aircraft with an Export C of A?
Comments:
Are back-to-birth records available? If not, by what method will the records
be reconciled?
Comments:
Comments:
Are any additional changes required to comply with the EASA TC?
Details:
Details:
Do the aircraft’s instruments and equipment comply with EU OPS 1.800 Subparts K & L?
Details:
ETOPS?
LROPS?
RVSM?
MNPS?
RNAV?
AWOPS?
Details:
Specify schedule or check list to which aircraft was tested and attach a completed copy:
The review complements the scope of the physical survey described below. The ARC
signatory should add additional items to this checklist for the aircraft under review and
choose an appropriate number of samples to verify
Examples would be repair data with a repair or the disposition of components described in
the records to ensure no discrepancies exist. Any invasive activity such as opening panels
or operating any system must be co-ordinated with, and certified by, an appropriately
licensed and authorised aircraft maintenance engineer.
Aircraft Documents
Tech Log contains correct contents, SMI CRS, Notice to Crews (as applicable),
deferred defects correctly certified/deferred/cleared with MEL references
and limitations correct?
Dent and Damage Log correctly completed and cross-refers to data assessed
during record review?
Aircraft Physical Inspection
Flight Deck
Cabin Inspection
Pax seats at exits are correct with respect to recline/break back, table and
stowage locks serviceable, no smoking placards and sealed waste containers
External Inspection
Review ATA Chapter 11 or equivalent and, where applicable, the AFM, STCs
or ADs to ensure compliance.
Where a repair has been sampled during the records review, check that
repairs accomplished iaw the SRM or other instructions approved through
Part 21?
Cargo bay floor and linings satisfactory with regard to integrity and unrepaired
damage
LLPs sampled by part number and serial number for correlation with documents viewed
during document review
Extension Extensions
Has the aircraft remained in a Controlled Environment over the last 12 months?
1st Extension
2nd Extension
Has the aircraft and its components been maintained by a Part 145
AMO?
Has the aircraft operated outside the limits stipulated in the Flight Manual, Certificate of
Airworthiness or other limit imposed by the Agency?
Comments:
Comment:
Complete all relevant blocks of this form but do not submit to the Competent
Authority unless indicated
Attach a copy of the application for an ARC to be submitted to the Competent Authority
Ensure that all findings do not affect safety, have been rectified or deferred, or
reported to the Competent Authority (Findings that indicate systemic problems
having no direct effect on safety should be raised as Corrective Actions)
An AD compliance list
The latest weight and balance schedule for the aircraft in its current configuration
Aircraft registration:
If the Extension or Airworthiness Review (including that required for an Import into the EU)
is inconclusive, advise the Competent Authority Immediately
This certifies that the aircraft has been subject to a record review and physical survey on
dates indicated above and complies with the applicable aspects of Part M. On this basis, it
is recommended that this aircraft is issued with an Airworthiness Review Certificate in
accordance with M.A. 901