Naturalisation As British Citizen by Discretion
Naturalisation As British Citizen by Discretion
Naturalisation As British Citizen by Discretion
Contacts
If you have any questions about the guidance and your line manager or senior
caseworker cannot help you or you think that the guidance has factual errors, then
email the Nationality Policy team.
If you notice any formatting errors in this guidance (broken links, spelling mistakes
and so on) or have any comments about the layout or navigability of the guidance
then you can email the Guidance Rules and Forms team.
Publication
Below is information on when this version of the guidance was published:
• version 14.0
• published for Home Office staff on 10 August 2023
Related content
Contents
This section tells you about the specific requirements an applicant must meet in
order to naturalise as a British citizen. The general requirements as to fees, the oath
and pledge and biometric enrolment are covered in cross-cutting guidance.
The requirements which an individual must meet vary slightly based on whether they
are married to, or in a civil partnership with, a British citizen. Where they are married
to, or in a civil partnership with a British citizen, they must meet the requirements of
section6(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981, anyone else is required to meet the
requirements of section 6(1) of the British Nationality Act 1981.
A person will not be eligible for naturalisation under this section if they meet the
criteria for the citizenship ban.
In addition to this in some cases it may be appropriate to exempt a person from the
language and knowledge of life requirements.
Related content
Contents
For further guidance on how to consider applications from children see Registration
as a British citizen: children guidance.
Related content
Contents
Checking an application
You must not grant a certificate of naturalisation to a person who is already a British
citizen. Where a person has an entitlement to British citizenship under another
provision of the British Nationality Act 1981, you should make them aware of it
before proceeding with the naturalisation application.
Where an applicant has an automatic claim to British citizenship you should write to
them informing them of the position, explaining that naturalisation is therefore not
necessary. You must also arrange for the fee to be refunded.
If the applicant is entitled to registration as a British citizen, you must write to the
applicant explaining this and if appropriate that the excess fee will be refunded.
Full capacity is defined in section 50(11) of the British Nationality Act 1981 as being
‘not of unsound mind’. It is not further defined in the act, but the requirement can be
regarded as having been satisfied if the standard set out below is met.
Required standard
The requirement is not intended to deny British nationality to individuals who have a
disability which makes it difficult for them to communicate. The requirement is
specifically to ensure that applicants can comprehend their actions in applying for
citizenship. You must therefore be careful not to refuse someone on the basis that
they cannot communicate as the result of a disability.
Whilst applicants must understand the purpose of their application, they do not need
to have a comprehensive understanding of nationality or citizenship, or the
procedures involved. Applicants must be of sufficiently sound mind to know before
applying that they want to acquire British citizenship. Before granting an application,
you must ensure that there is no reason to doubt that that level of understanding is
present or capable of being restored.
Section 44A of the British Nationality Act 1981 allows for the full capacity
requirement to be waived where it is in the best interests of the individual.
• the views of the applicant, to the extent that they can express them
• the views of any person, professional or otherwise, who has assumed
responsibility for the applicant’s welfare
• the citizenship status of other family members, especially those with whom the
applicant resides or is in regular contact
The decision whether to waive the full capacity requirement should be taken by a
Senior Caseworker.
Related content
Contents
Whilst there is some discretion to waive some of these requirements, this cannot be
done to the extent that the requirements are ignored.
• in the UK at the beginning of the period of 5 years ending with the date of the
application
• not absent from the UK for more than:
o 450 days in that 5-year period
o 90 days in the period of 12 months ending with the date of application
• not, on the date of application, subject under the immigration laws to any
restriction on the period of stay in the UK
• not, at any other time in the 12-month period ending with date of application,
subject under the immigration laws to any restriction on their period of stay in
the UK
• not at any time in the period of 5 years ending with the date of application, in
the UK in breach of the immigration laws - however, a person can be treated as
meeting this requirement without further enquiries if they hold indefinite leave to
enter or remain in the UK
There is discretion to waive the residence requirements except that the applicant
must be free from time restrictions under immigration law at the time of their
application
• in the UK at the beginning of the period of 3 years ending with the date of
application
• not absent from the UK for more than:
o 270 days in that 3-year period
o 90 days in the period of 12 months ending with the date of application
• not, on the date of the application subject under the immigration laws to any
restriction on their period of stay in the UK
Page 13 of 54 Published for Home Office staff on 10 August 2023
• not, at any time in the period of 3 years ending with the date of application in
breach of immigration laws - however, a person can be treated as meeting this
requirement without further enquiries if they hold indefinite leave to enter or
remain in the UK
There is discretion to waive the residence for applications under section 6(2) of the
British Nationality Act 1981 with the exception of the requirement that the applicant
must be free from time restrictions under immigration law at the time of their
application.
All other applicants must have been physically present in the UK on the first day of
the qualifying period. There is discretion to waive this requirement (see section on
discretion).
To identify the start of the qualifying period you use the day after the application date
minus the length of the qualifying period. For example in an application under section
Discretion to treat the requirement to have been in the UK on the first day of the
residential qualifying period as fulfilled should normally be exercised if one or more
of the following is met:
• the applicant was prevented from being in the UK because they had been
removed from the UK, and the decision to remove them was later overturned
• the applicant was incorrectly prevented from resuming permanent residence in
the UK following an absence
• the applicant is normally resident in the UK but there were exceptional reasons
why they could not return from abroad at that time, such as illness, or travel
restrictions due to a pandemic
• the applicant is a current or former member of the armed forces (see the
section on armed forces applicants)
If there has been a fee change between the original application date and the date
that they can now meet the requirement (to have been in the UK at the start of the
qualifying period), they must pay the fee in force at the time of the new application
date.
Changing the application date in this way may be appropriate for applicants who did
not meet the requirement to have been in the UK at the start of the qualifying period
but meet the requirement by the time you consider their application. When you
consider the application, you must assess whether the person would meet this
Absences
You must check the available evidence to see whether an applicant meets the
residence requirements.
• passports or travel documents which have been stamped to show arrival in the
UK and entry and departure from other countries: these should be checked
against the list of absences that applicants are asked to provide on the
application form
• Home Office records
• if the applicant does not have passports to cover the qualifying period, other
evidence such as employers’ letters or tax and National Insurance letters:
o in such cases you should assess whether there is sufficient evidence to
show that that applicant has been resident in the UK during the qualifying
period, giving them the benefit of any doubt where claimed absences are
within the limits we would normally allow and there are no grounds to doubt
the accuracy of the claim
You must not normally accept doctors' letters on their own as proof of residence.
However, if nothing else is available and the doctors can confirm that they have seen
the applicant on a regular basis during the period concerned these may be accepted.
If there are gaps in a person’s evidence of residence and it is clear from the
information available that they could not have travelled, you must accept this.
Examples of this might include a refugee who has no means of travel or where
immigration records confirm continuous residence.
You must only count whole days' absences from the UK. You must not count the
dates of departure and arrival as absences. For example, a person who left the UK
on 22 September and returned on 23 September will not be classed as having been
absent from the UK.
An applicant only needs to have been physically present in the UK for the purpose of
the act. They do not have to have been ordinarily resident or domiciled here.
Where the applicant exceeds the permitted absence by 30 days or less you must
exercise discretion unless there are other grounds on which the application falls to
be refused.
Where the applicant has absences of between 480 and 900 days for applications
under section 6(1) of the British Nationality Act 1981, or 300 and 540 days for
applications under section 6(2) and otherwise meets the requirements you must only
consider exercising discretion where the applicant has established their home,
employment, family and finances in the UK, and one or more of the following applies:
• at least 2 years residence (for applications under section 6(1)), or 1 year (for
applications under section 6(2)), without substantial absences immediately prior
to the beginning of the qualifying period - if the period of absence is greater
than 730 days (for section 6(1)) or 450 days (for section 6(2)) the period of
residence must be at least 3 or 2 years respectively
• the excess absences are the result of:
o postings abroad in Crown service under the UK government or in service
designated under section 2(3) of the British Nationality act 1981.
o accompanying a British citizen spouse or civil partner on an appointment
overseas
• the excess absences were an unavoidable consequence of the nature of the
applicant’s career, such as a merchant seaman or employment with a
multinational company based in the UK with frequent travel abroad
• exceptionally compelling reasons of an occupational or compassionate nature
to justify naturalisation now, such as a firm job offer where British citizenship is
a statutory or mandatory requirement
• the applicant was prevented from being in the UK because they had been
removed from the UK, and the decision to remove them was later overturned
• the applicant was incorrectly prevented from resuming permanent residence in
the UK following an absence
• the excess absences were because the applicant was unable to return to the
UK because of global pandemic
Where the applicant’s absence exceeds those covered above as a result of Crown
Service overseas, discretion should normally be exercised where:
• before an overseas posting the applicant was resident in the UK and Islands
• the excess absence was due to either:
o a period of absence from the UK and Islands on a posting on Crown service
o a period of absence from the UK and Islands accompanying a spouse, civil
partner, partner or parent on a posting on Crown service
• exempt from immigration control under section 8(3) of the Immigration Act 1971
– diplomats
• exempt from immigration control under section 8(4) of the Immigration Act 1971
• members of home, Commonwealth or visiting forces
• detained in hospital or other place of detention or unlawfully at large in the UK
following a conviction for an offence
Armed Forces
For members of Armed forces see the Crown, designated or Armed forces section of
this guidance.
Related content
Contents
• those who are, or have been, members of the home forces, such as HM Forces
and were serving in the UK on the date of application
• past and present members of the diplomatic staff of a mission
• a Commonwealth or visiting force, whether locally engaged or otherwise
• past and present locally engaged members of the non-diplomatic
administrative, technical, and service staff of a mission who:
o started their employment before 1 August 1988
o were locally recruited on or after 1 August 1988 and were not at that time
entitled to exemption from control but became so entitled upon re-admission
following an absence abroad
• they were granted indefinite leave to remain at least 12 months before applying
for naturalisation
• they can show strong links with the UK which are wholly independent of the
exempt employment, such as a period of residence before they entered the
exempt employment
• they otherwise qualify for naturalisation
You must check the applicant’s immigration status, where it is either known or
suspected that the applicant has ceased to be a member of a household and
therefore ceased to be exempt.
This had been done to prevent any abuse of obtaining employment at a mission to
prolong a person’s stay in the UK when the person would not otherwise qualify under
the Immigration Rules.
Those who began their exempt employment before 1 August 1988 are exempt from
control. However, you must normally treat any technical absence as residence if the
applicant either:
If the applicant is otherwise qualified for naturalisation and has ceased to be exempt
from control but has not been granted ILR, you must consult Permanent Migration
casework. They should be asked to advise if they would be likely to grant ILR if the
applicant’s exempt employment ended now.
If the applicant is otherwise qualified for naturalisation, and has already been, or
would be likely to be, given ILR, you must grant the application.
If the applicant is otherwise qualified for naturalisation but has not been, or is unlikely
to be, given ILR, you must normally refuse the application unless there are
particularly compelling circumstances which might justify the grant of naturalisation
now.
• spouse/civil partner
• dependent children under the age of 18
• dependent children over the age of 18 who are still in full time education
• dependent relatives who formed part of the household abroad, such as an
elderly widowed parent
• other close relatives who have no one to look after them, such as young,
orphaned brothers and sisters
You must take care in cases where it is known or suspected that the applicant has
ceased to be a member of a household, and so ceased to be entitled to an
exemption. If so, the applicant may either meet the normal residence requirements
because they have no technical absence or need to regularise their stay.
• the applicant has been granted a free pardon by the exercise of the Royal
Prerogative of Mercy
• it has been officially recognised that the grounds on which the applicant was
sentenced cannot be relied on
• the conviction is spent under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974
Detention
If an applicant has been granted leave to enter the UK at the end of a period of
detention you must normally count the period of detention as residence.
If the applicant was either removed, or departed voluntarily, from the UK at the end
of the period of detention, you must not normally exercise discretion to count this
period of ‘technical absence’ as residence.
If a person has been removed, or has made a voluntary departure, from the UK
following a period of immigration bail or temporary admission, you must treat that
period as if it were a period of ‘technical absence’. However, if you are refusing the
application on that basis, you must not say that the Secretary of State is not
prepared to exercise discretion to waive a ‘technical absence’. Instead you must use
the following wording (amend as appropriate when addressing a representative):
‘The Secretary of State is not obliged to naturalise a person who meets the formal
statutory requirements, and will not normally be prepared to naturalise a person
whose period of immigration bail under the Immigration Act 2016 [or temporary
admission under the Immigration Act 1971], combined with any absences from the
United Kingdom during the 5 year period where applying under section 6(1) of the
1981 Act or 3 year period where applying under section 6 (2) of the 1981 Act
ending with the date of application, exceeds 450 or 270 days respectively.
Your application has been carefully considered, but the Secretary of State is not of
the opinion that there are exceptional circumstances in your case which would
justify a departure from the normal practice’
Related content
Contents
A person is not regarded as being free from immigration time restrictions if they:
“The Secretary of State is not obliged to naturalise a person who meets the
requirements in schedule 1 to the 1981 act, and will not normally be prepared to
do so if it appears to her that the sole or main purpose in applying from outside
the UK was to circumvent the requirement for the applicant to be free, on the date
of application, from any restriction under the immigration laws on the maximum
length of their stay in the UK.”
Information about EEA nationals who applied before 1 July 2021 can be found in
EEA nationals.
If the applicant has ILR (settled status) granted through the EUSS, you must check
the date of grant against Home Office records.
Where a person was settled in the UK before 1 January 1973, they may be free from
immigration time restrictions. Such cases must be considered in line with the
Windrush Scheme casework guidance.
Page 25 of 54 Published for Home Office staff on 10 August 2023
Free from immigration time restrictions for 12 months
Applicants under section 6(1) should be free from immigration time restrictions not
only on the date of application, but also for 12 months prior.
You may encounter applications from EEA or Swiss applicants (or their family
member) who hold LTE/R (pre-settled status) under the EUSS, or who have been
granted ILR (settled status) under the EUSS but have not held it for 12 months at the
date of their naturalisation application.
In these instances, checks should be conducted to see whether the applicant had
acquired a Withdrawal Agreement right to reside permanently on the basis of
qualifying activity for the relevant period.
If they held this status for 12 months before being granted ILR (settled status) under
the EUSS, they will have met the requirement of being free from immigration time
restrictions for 12 months.
Applicants under section 6(1) who have not been free from
immigration time restrictions for 12 months
There is also discretion to waive this requirement in certain circumstances.
• the applicant had less than 12 months free from time restrictions when they
applied, but meets the requirement by the time you consider the application,
and all the other requirements are met
• the applicant had been put on conditions when returning to the UK, but has
since established that they were a returning resident or exempt from control
• the period of limited leave was less than 10 days at the beginning of the 12-
month period
• the period of limited leave was between 10 and 90 days at the beginning of the
12-month period, and the applicant:
o meets all the other requirements
o has strong links with the UK through having established their home, property
and family here
• the period of limited leave was more than 90 days at the beginning of the 12-
month period, and:
o the applicant meets all the other requirements
o the applicant has strong links with the UK through having established their
home, property and family here
o there are compelling business or compassionate reasons to justify granting
now
• the period of limited leave was more than 10 days at the beginning of the 12-
month period, and:
o the applicant does not meet all the other requirements
Page 26 of 54 Published for Home Office staff on 10 August 2023
o has strong links with the UK through having established their home, property
and family here
o there are compelling business or compassionate reasons to justify granting
now
o there are exceptionally compelling circumstances.
• the applicant made an application for ILR at least 15 months before the
citizenship application, and was granted following a delay which was not their
fault
• an application for leave or asylum was refused in error and, if it had been
granted correctly, the applicant could have applied for ILR and met the
requirements on the date of application
A High Court judgment handed down on 21 December 2022 found the Withdrawal
Agreement residence right of an individual with pre-settled status does not expire for
failure to make a second application to the EU Settlement Scheme. From September
2023 people with LTE/R (pre-settled status) under the EU Settlement Scheme
(EUSS) will have their status automatically extended by 2 years before it expires if
they have not obtained settled status.
These individuals should not be treated as having been in the UK unlawfully unless
there is specific evidence their status has been revoked or otherwise lapsed due to
excess absences.
The Nationality and Borders Act 2022 amended the British Nationality Act 1981 so
that where a person has been granted indefinite leave to enter or remain in the UK,
they can be treated as meeting the requirement to have been lawfully resident
without enquiring into whether they have been in the UK in breach of immigration
laws prior to their grant of indefinite leave.
This only applies where a person has made an application for and been granted
indefinite leave under the Immigration Rules, including settled status under the EU
Settlement Scheme. It does not apply where a person has acquired a Withdrawal
Agreement right to reside in the UK permanently but has not obtained indefinite
leave under the Immigration Rules, including settled status under the EU Settlement
Scheme. Such cases remain subject to the lawful residence assessment.
If a person entered the UK illegally on or after 7 March 2023, you must refer to the
section on the citizenship ban below.
You do not need to ask for evidence of the person’s status prior to them being
granted ILE or ILR, or whether they were working lawfully, or what their basis of stay
was in the UK. For example, you do not need to enquire what activity was being
undertaken or whether EEA nationals with ILR needed or had comprehensive
sickness insurance. This will apply to most cases.
The good character guidance has been amended to be consistent with this
approach.
Citizens of Ireland
Irish citizens can enter and stay in the UK without requiring permission, see
Common travel area guidance. (There are some limited exceptions to this, where the
person is subject to a deportation order, exclusion decision or exclusion order, or
travel ban) They will therefore have been in the UK lawfully during the qualifying
period.
• required leave to enter the United Kingdom, but entered the United Kingdom:
o without leave to enter (or with leave to enter that was obtained by deception)
o in breach of a deportation order
o without a valid entry clearance if it was required; or without a valid electronic
travel authorisation if one was required.
Page 28 of 54 Published for Home Office staff on 10 August 2023
• entered or arrived on or after 7 March 2023
• did not come directly from a country in which their life and liberty were
threatened by reason of their race, religion, nationality, membership of a
particular social group or political opinion
They also will not qualify if they entered Jersey, Guernsey or the Isle of Man, or an
overseas territory, in the same way.
There is an exemption to the citizenship ban where treating a person as ineligible for
citizenship would breach the United Kingdom’s obligations under the Human Rights
Convention. This means that we will need to consider the application, although not
necessarily grant.
It is unlikely that you will see any applications where this applies for some time. This
is because a person who enters on or after 7 March 2023 would not be able to apply
for naturalisation for many years (if ever, as they will be banned from settlement).
However, if you do come across such an application, you must refer it to a senior
caseworker for advice.
Related content
Contents
• meet the residence requirements, without the need to exercise any discretion
over excess absences other than up to 30 days
• have an established home here
• have been, or intend to be, absent from the UK for not more than 6 months
• the absence was, or will be, clearly temporary
• if it is an intended absence, we are satisfied they intend to return to the UK
• they have maintained an established home here where any close family who
have not accompanied them abroad have continued to live
• there is no information to cast doubt on their intention, for example, either:
o a partner who is or intends to live outside of the UK
o a recent absence from the UK for a period of 6 months or more
Where it is not certain that a residence has been established you must make
enquiries to see whether there is evidence of a principal residence outside this
country including whether the:
Where there is such evidence, or your doubts cannot be resolved satisfactorily, you
must refuse the application.
Information may also come to our attention that HMRC regard an applicant as
domiciled abroad for tax purposes. In such cases, you must request the applicant's
permission to contact the HMRC. You should then ask the HMRC to provide us with
a copy of the applicant's completed ‘Domicile Enquiry’ questionnaire, which may
throw some light on future intentions. If the applicant refuses permission, you must
refuse the application.
The fact that an applicant's spouse or partner is not applying for citizenship should
not, of itself, be taken as evidence that the requirement is not met. In such a case,
however, you should make enquiries of the applicant - whether the spouse or partner
is resident abroad or whether there is any evidence that the spouse or partner
intends to move abroad. The fact that a spouse or partner is living, or will shortly be
living, abroad should not normally be taken as evidence that the requirement is not
met if any of the following apply:
If none of these reasons apply, and the information suggests that any applicant
maintains, or intends shortly to maintain, their principal residence abroad, spends
substantial periods with their spouse or partner and children abroad, the application
should normally be refused.
• the applicant is undertaking voluntary work such as with the Voluntary Service
Overseas (VSO)
• the applicant is undertaking studies, training, or employment abroad which is
necessary to pursue a UK based profession, vocation or occupation
Where an applicant has more than one home and their principal home is outside of
the UK at the time of application you must refuse the application.
Related content
Contents
You should normally accept that applicants meet the requirement if they meet all the
following:
International organisations
Employment with an international organisation of which the UK or HM government is
a member was added to the types of service designated under the British Nationality
Act 1981 in 2006. Where the employment relates to a period before 2006 you must
not consider it as designated service.
You should refuse applications where the applicant only provides services to an
international organisation on an occasional basis as they have not established a
substantial degree of commitment and direct involvement over a period of time. Each
case must be considered on its merits.
• an employee
• self-employed and have registered themselves as a company
• self-employed as a partner in a going concern
• a company director
A company may be regarded as established in the UK if all the following apply, it is:
• they have stated intention to live in the UK on the completion of the service or
employment
• there is no information in the papers to suggest otherwise
If the intended period of qualifying service or employment is for less than 5 years
from the date that the application is considered, you must consider the applicants
future intentions in the normal way.
You must obtain written confirmation of the future intentions of the applicant’s
spouse or civil partner. This written confirmation will normally be sufficient.
However, you should not normally regard the future intentions requirement as being
met where; for example, there is evidence to suggest that the applicant’s own
intentions do not correspond with those of their spouse or civil partner.
For a spouse or civil partner to be considered as established they must have been
married, in a civil partnership or cohabited with their partner for a period of at least
12 months. Where a government department confirms the length of relationship you
do not need to query this further. In other cases, you must ask for documentary
evidence of cohabitation covering the 12 months immediately prior to application.
Evidence should be in the form of official documents such as bank statements and
utility bills, you must not accept circular mail.
Related content
Contents
Related content
Contents
Designated service is service that the Home Secretary has passed an order
designating it as being closely linked with the activities outside the UK of the UK
government or the government of a qualifying overseas territory. For more
information see the list of designated service.
To qualify under this provision a person must be serving outside the UK on the date
of application.
• good character
• knowledge of language and life in the UK
• future intentions
Naturalisation is at the discretion of the Home Secretary, but those applying based
on their Crown service abroad are also expected to demonstrate that their service
and connections with the UK are significant enough to justify exercising discretion.
• quality of service
• connections with the UK
• rank or grade
• loyalty
• length of service
• advantage to UK
Quality of service
If this quality of service criterion is not met, you must not normally exercise discretion
to naturalise the applicant, even if the statutory requirements and the other criteria
are met.
Rank or grade
The more senior the applicant, the more likely they are to be able to meet the
outstanding service requirement. However, this does not rule out an applicant who
has served in a junior post and who may have performed particularly deserving
service.
Loyalty
You must normally expect loyalty to have been tested and have been shown to be
beyond question. Examples might include someone who has put themselves at risk
from a hostile foreign government or made themselves unpopular among their
people by their commitment to the UK.
Length of service
Long service on its own is not sufficient to exercise discretion. You must normally
expect the applicant to have maintained exceptional service for at least 10 years.
Advantage to the UK
A person in Crown service who does not meet some or any of the above criteria may
still be naturalised if there is a strong argument that it would be operationally
advantageous for them to be a British citizen. In such cases, the employing
department or service must demonstrate that advantage in detail. You must not
naturalise a person on this basis alone unless it is shown that it is vital to UK
interests that the applicant should be naturalised.
Related content
Contents
Applicants serving in Brigade of Gurkhas must also meet the following criteria.
• calculate the number of days’ technical absence in the qualifying period and
exclude this from the residence count
• combine technical absences with actual absences to obtain the total number of
days’ absence during the qualifying period
• apply the normal levels of permitted absence and not exercise discretion over
any excess absences
Most applications from serving members of the Brigade of Gurkhas will be refused
as they will have excess absences. You must advise them of this using DocGen
letter ICD2818.
If you have applied the criteria above, but an application from serving Gurkhas would
still succeed, you must refer the case to the Deputy Chief caseworker.
Related content
Contents
Absences
There is discretion within the British Nationality Act 1981 to overlook the requirement
to have been in the UK on the first day of the 5 year qualifying period.
You must normally exercise discretion where:
• the applicant was a member of the UK armed forces on the first day of the 5-
year qualifying period
• they were unable to be physically present on that date because of their service
in the armed forces
• they meet all the other requirements for section 6(1).
You must also treat any ‘technical’ absences during the qualifying period as
residence.
You must also disregard all actual absences from the UK that were due to the
applicant’s armed forces service.
While applicants were in military service it is unlikely that their passports will have
been stamped. However, as we would overlook any service-related absences, it is
not necessary to see service records confirming each absence. You must, however,
see evidence from the Ministry of Defence confirming duration of service in the
armed forces. Any non-service-related absences can be confirmed by the applicant’s
passport.
For periods after discharge from the forces ex-servicemen must produce normal
evidence of residence either a passport or alternative evidence of residence.
In some cases, the former armed forces member will have been granted 28 days
limited leave on discharge before being granted ILR. In such cases you must
Page 41 of 54 Published for Home Office staff on 10 August 2023
exercise discretion over the requirement to be free from immigration time restrictions
in the 12-month period before making the application. You must not normally
exercise discretion in this way if the former armed forces member had been granted
a longer period of limited leave on other grounds.
Where an ex-member of the armed forces has not been granted Indefinite leave to
enter (ILE) or ILR, you must refuse the application and advise the applicant to obtain
ILE or ILR prior to submitting a further application for citizenship. You must refuse on
either:
Refusals
You must not refuse an application from a current or former member of the armed
forces, other than a currently serving member of the Brigade of Gurkhas, without first
referring the case to the Chief Caseworker, who will determine if the case needs to
be referred to ministers.
Related content
Contents
Spouses, civil partners and children of servicemen are not exempt from immigration
control while residing in the UK. Instead, they are generally given leave to remain as
long as their spouse or civil partner is in service. While spouses and civil partners
still have limited leave to remain, they will not be able to meet the criteria to be free
of immigration time restrictions and you must refuse their applications. Any children
will not normally meet the future intentions criteria for section 3(1).
Once spouses, partners and children become settled, they will be able to apply for
naturalisation or registration. They may have high levels of absences either because
they have been accompanying their spouse, civil partner or parent overseas or
because they have not been able to accompany them while they are in the UK. You
must consider disregarding any absences that occurred as a result of the spouse’s
or civil partner’s absences using the same criteria as for an applicant in the forces.
Where the applicant is the spouse or civil partner of a member of the armed forces
who is a British citizen, you must consider in accordance with the section on spouses
or civil partners of British citizens in Crown or designated service.
Related content
Contents
When you are considering an application where the applicant is the spouse or civil
partner of a British citizen who is in Crown or designated service, who was recruited
for that service whilst in the UK, you can use discretion to waive the following
requirements:
• the requirement to have been in the UK on a date 3 years before the date of
application
• the requirements not to have been absent for more than 270 days in the 3-year
qualifying period or more than 90 days in the final year of the qualifying period
Where the marriage or civil partnership has not subsisted for at least 3 years on the
date of application, you must only exercise discretion where the employing service
has provided compelling operational or security reasons to justify granting the
application.
You must not apply discretion where the applicant and their spouse or civil partner
has returned to the UK and a further posting abroad is unlikely to occur in the
foreseeable future.
• applicant meets the good character and Knowledge of language and life in the
UK (KoLL) requirements
• spouse or civil partner is serving abroad, or is likely soon to be posted abroad
in Crown or designated and was recruited to the service in question in the UK
The employing organisation must provide information about the applicant's general
character and suitability.
Related content
Contents
For people applying before 31 December 2020, EEA and Swiss nationals and
their family members were free of immigration time restrictions on the date of
application if they:
• held permanent residence under the EEA Regulations – they must have been
issued with a permanent residence card / document to apply for naturalisation
• had been granted indefinite leave to remain under the Immigration Rules
• (including under the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS)) - where an applicant
wishes to rely upon permanent residence under the EEA Regulations to
demonstrate an earlier entitlement, they will need to have a permanent
residence card
• were entitled by virtue of diplomatic status to exemption from UK immigration
control
• benefitted under the Common Travel Area provisions as Irish nationals
For people who applied between 1 January 2021 and 30 June 2021, EEA and
Swiss nationals and their family members were free from immigration time
restrictions on the date of application if they:
• had indefinite leave to remain (ILR) under the EUSS - if so, they must rely on
that to show that they are free from immigration time restrictions - (they can
show that they have been free from immigration time restrictions for 12 months
before applying using current EUSS leave and permanent residence they
previously held under the EEA Regulations)
• had been granted indefinite leave to remain under the Immigration Rules on
another basis
• had a permanent residence right under the EEA Regulations - if they do not
have EUSS leave on the date of application - they will need a permanent
residence card/document to apply for citizenship on this basis, but will not be
able to apply for such a document if they do not already have one
• were entitled by virtue of diplomatic status to exemption from UK immigration
control
• benefitted as an Irish national
For further information, see the guidance on European Economic Area and Swiss
nationals free movement rights.
Related content
Contents
‘Breach of the immigration laws’ for the purpose of the residence requirements refers
only to unlawful residence. It does not include contravening immigration law in any
other way, but this is considered as part of the good character requirement.
However, it can include being in the UK without meeting an additional requirement,
such an EU, European Economic Area (EEA) or Swiss national not holding
comprehensive sickness insurance if they needed to.
People who were entitled to reside in the UK without leave under the EEA
Regulations 2016 were lawfully resident in the UK whilst the Regulations were in
force. They needed to apply to the EUSS before 30 June 2021 to avoid being in the
UK unlawfully.
A person who is in the UK and does not meet any of the above criteria will be in
breach, as defined in section 50A of the British Nationality Act.
Citizenship applications, however, are made under the British Nationality Act 1981
and not under the immigration rules. It is consequently not possible to vary an
application from one for leave, to one for citizenship. Making a citizenship application
Page 47 of 54 Published for Home Office staff on 10 August 2023
does not give permission to stay in the UK. Applicants need to have valid leave until
they have both received a decision on their nationality application and attended their
naturalisation ceremony.
When considering whether an EEA or Swiss national, or their family member, was in
the UK lawfully in the 3- or 5-year period before making their application, you may
need to consider 3 different time periods:
• time before 1 January 2021- before the UK left the EU and the “transition
period”
• time between 1 January 2021 and 30 June 2021 – the “Grace period”
• time from 1 July 2021 onwards – after the end of the Grace period; - EEA
residential rights will no longer be valid unless they had been extended by
making an in-time application to the EUSS that had not been resolved on the
date the individual applied for citizenship
EEA and Swiss nationals only need to complete 3 key steps as part of their
application to the scheme – prove their identity and nationality, show that they were
resident in the UK and Islands by 31 December 2020, and declare any criminal
convictions. Where the applicant chooses to provide their National Insurance
number, their presence in the UK will be assessed on an automated basis using data
held by HM Revenue & Customs and the Department for Work and Pensions.
An EEA or Swiss citizen or their family members who have a 5 years’ continuous
qualifying period of residence in the UK and Islands when they apply to the EU
Settlement Scheme will be eligible for settled status (provided they also meet any
other relevant eligibility and suitability criteria). Those with a continuous qualifying
period of less than 5 years’ will be eligible for pre-settled status (provided they also
meet any other relevant eligibility and suitability criteria). A person who is granted
pre-settled status can then apply for settled status as soon as they meet the eligibility
criteria for it.
However, this grant of settled status (also known as indefinite leave to enter or
remain) will not confirm that they were here lawfully, as defined by the British
Nationality Act 1981, under the EEA Regulations during that time, as this is not a
requirement of the EU Settlement Scheme. You may, therefore, need to request
further information from the applicant to demonstrate this.
The naturalisation application form (Form AN) asks for information to confirm the
applicant was lawfully in the UK for the relevant 3- or 5-year qualifying period.
A person granted status under the EUSS may have had dual running rights under
both UK immigration rules (in accordance with their grant of status) and the EEA
Regulations during their residence. To assess whether the person was here lawfully
in accordance with the EEA Regulations (if required) prior to their grant of pre-settled
or settled status you must look at the guidance on EEA/Swiss nationals and their
family members. This includes the type of evidence you can take into account. You
must assess whether the applicant was lawfully resident under the EEA Regulations
in accordance with that guidance and therefore lawfully in the UK for any residence
prior to the grant of pre-settled status or settled status.
If the information is not provided with the application form, you must request it.
• self-sufficient person
• student
• family member of a self-sufficient person or student
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held in the case of VI v HM
Revenue and Customs C-247/20 (10 March 2022) that once an individual was
“affiliated” to the NHS, they had CSI under the Free Movement Directive (or the
equivalent under earlier Regulations)
“Affiliated” to the NHS was not defined by the CJEU but is considered to mean
entitled to comprehensive and free NHS treatment. Under domestic law, an
individual has such an entitlement when they are “ordinarily resident” in the UK. As a
result, if an individual was ordinarily resident in the UK, they will be considered to
have held CSI.
For those EEA and Swiss applicants who have been studying in the UK, or here as a
self-sufficient person, you must check the guidance on European Economic Area
nationals: qualified persons, to see what evidence is required to demonstrate that
they were here lawfully.
Following the case of VI v HM Revenue and Customs (see above) a person who was
ordinarily resident in the UK will be considered to have held CSI. “Ordinarily resident”
means that an individual’s residence in the UK is voluntary, lawful and for a settled
Page 50 of 54 Published for Home Office staff on 10 August 2023
purpose. The approach to assess whether an individual was ordinarily resident in the
UK for free movement purposes is set out in guidance on European Economic Area
nationals: qualified persons.
If a person cannot demonstrate that they had CSI, you must consider why they did
not hold it. Where someone has been granted ILR under the EUSS but has not been
resident here in accordance with the EEA regulations (prior to grant of pre-settled
status or settled status) due to a lack of comprehensive sickness insurance you
should consider whether it is appropriate to exercise discretion in their favour.
Some applicants will have previously had an application for a document to confirm
their permanent residence refused, based on not having CSI. You must assess
whether they would have qualified following the VI judgement. If not, you must
consider the reasons given, and why they did not then obtain it, and consider
whether there are compelling grounds to exercise discretion. (Should they make a
new application, we do not have agreement to revisit old decisions, including
reconsideration.)
From 1 January 2021 until 30 June 2021, during the “Grace Period”, a person who
does not have EUSS leave could still rely on an EEA residence right to reside here
lawfully but could not apply for a document confirming that right. If they do not
already hold a permanent residence document, they were, therefore, not able to
apply to naturalise without first gaining EUSS ILR. However, in any subsequent
naturalisation application, they would still be able to provide evidence that they were
exercising an EEA right prior to the grant of EUSS ILR to show that they were
lawfully resident throughout the relevant residential period. They would not need a
permanent residence document but may supply one if it supports their application.
For further information see the guidance on European Economic Area (EEA) and
Swiss Nationals: Free Movement Rights.
People who were in the UK in accordance with EU law may have acquired
permanent residence at some point, despite not having a document. A right to reside
under EU law exists automatically where the terms of the EEA Regulations are met.
If they had time periods where they were not here in accordance with the EEA
Regulations you must determine if they were here lawfully on the basis that they had
previously acquired permanent residence and were no longer required to meet
certain requirements, such as being a qualified person.
Applicants who claimed asylum immediately on arrival in the UK and were granted
temporary admission or immigration bail pending determination of their claim will not
have been in breach of the immigration laws while their application was being
considered or during consideration of any in-time appeals. Even if their application is
refused and any subsequent appeal dismissed, the applicant will still not have been
in breach, until their temporary admission or immigration bail was revoked and their
leave to enter was formally refused.
Applicants who claimed asylum during a period of leave to enter or remain in the UK
were not in breach of the immigration laws during consideration of their asylum claim
and any in-time appeals. However, if the application was refused and the appeal
dismissed, they will normally have been given 28 days’ further leave to remain. They
will have been in breach if they remained in the UK after that 28-day period. This
also applies to cases where the applicant was granted leave to enter or remain
under a Humanitarian Evacuation Programme (HEP).
Applicants who made an asylum claim whilst in the UK illegally (for example, as an
overstayer or following clandestine entry), will have been in the UK in breach of the
immigration laws until they were granted leave to remain in the UK. They will be in
breach throughout the period when the application (and any subsequent appeal) was
being considered. This will have been the case whether or not they were given
temporary admission or immigration bail following detection.
Page 52 of 54 Published for Home Office staff on 10 August 2023
Discretion to waive immigration breaches
There is some discretion, in the special circumstances of a particular case, to
disregard breaches of the immigration laws (unlawful residence) during the qualifying
period. Such breaches only involve being here without leave to enter or remain.
Other immigration offences, such as breaching a restriction on taking employment
and harbouring other immigration offenders, should not be considered under the
residence requirement, but under the good character requirement.
A person may also be in breach if they have not complied fully with all the
requirements of the route they are on. Following the introduction of the EUSS, you
may increasingly see applications from EEA or Swiss nationals who have not fully
complied with additional requirements under the EEA regulations, such as having
comprehensive sickness insurance where they needed it, and who may therefore
have been in breach of immigration law. When considering such applications, you
should consider all the facts surrounding such a breach and make a full assessment
about whether discretion should be exercised in their favour.
• the breach occurred at a time when the applicant was a minor whose parents
failed to obtain or renew their leave
• the EUSS application of an EEA or Swiss citizen (or their close family member)
was submitted after 30 June 2021 but was later accepted as having reasonable
grounds for missing the deadline and was resolved successfully
• the applicant was given permission to stay as an ‘exceptional assurance’
because of their inability to leave the UK or apply for an extension of stay due
to the COVID-19 pandemic
• the applicant was a victim of domestic violence whose abusive partner
prevented the renewal of leave
• the applicant had made an ‘in-time’ application, but the application was rejected
and so they became in breach:
o this is provided there is no reason to doubt that the form was submitted in
good faith and a fresh application was submitted within 28 days of the
rejection and before 24 November 2016
• the person had made a late application for leave to remain which was
subsequently granted and either the:
o application was not submitted more than 28 days after the expiry of their
previous leave and before 24 November 2016
You should not exercise discretion to disregard a period of unlawful residence in any
other circumstances, and particularly not when the breach was both substantial and
deliberate.
This includes:
• unlawful residence after the person tried to regularise their stay (except in the
cases referred to above)
• unlawful residence where a person who had deliberately entered or remained in
the UK without permission was granted leave under the former 14-year long
residence policy or under a concession (unless refugee status was granted as
a result)
You must not use this discretion for breaches other than unlawful residence during
the qualifying period such as working in breach of conditions, or failure to observe
reporting requirements. Where the residence requirement is met with or without the
exercise of discretion, it is then a separate test whether the person meets the good
character requirement, and a history of non-compliance with immigration
requirements is a factor to be weighed in that decision.
Related content
Contents