Cambridge IGCSE™: First Language English 0500/12
Cambridge IGCSE™: First Language English 0500/12
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2023 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however, the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Note: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the texts.
Question 1
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R5 (25 marks):
and Question 1(f) only tests writing assessment objectives W2, W3 and W5 (5 marks):
1(a) Give two qualities that are required to work a winter season at a ski resort, 1
according to the text.
1(b)(i) Using your own words, explain what the text means by: ‘staff quit’ (line 5): 2
Award 2 marks for full explanation (both strands). Award 1 mark for partial explanation.
1(b)(ii) Using your own words, explain what the text means by: ‘variety of positions’ (line 2
7):
Award 2 marks for full explanation (both strands). Award 1 mark for partial explanation.
Give two reasons why it might be difficult to ensure that you put in your
application in time.
Identify the two main decisions you will need to make before applying for a job in
a ski resort.
Explain the specific features of powder snow that make it the best snow to ride.
Using your own words, explain why some people might decide not to apply
through a recruitment organisation.
Answers which are entirely in the words of the text should not be credited.
1(f) According to Text B, what are the advantages and disadvantages of taking a 15
seasonal job?
You must use continuous writing (not note form) and use your own words as far
as possible. Your summary should not be more than 120 words.
Up to 10 marks are available for the content of your answer and up to 5 marks for
the quality of your writing.
Use the Marking Criteria for Question 1(f) (Table A, Reading and Table B Writing).
INDICATIVE READING CONTENT
Candidates may refer to any of the points below:
0 0 • No creditable content.
Table B, Writing
3 4–5 • A relevant response that is expressed clearly, fluently and mostly with concision.
• The response is well organised.
• The response is in the candidate’s own words (where appropriate), using a
range of well-chosen vocabulary which clarifies meaning.
• Spelling, punctuation and grammar are mostly accurate.
2 3–2 • A relevant response that is generally expressed clearly, with some evidence of
concision.
• There may be some lapses in organisation.
• The response is mainly expressed in the candidate’s own words (where
appropriate) but there may be reliance on the words of the text.
• Errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar which do not impede
communication.
0 0 • No creditable content.
Note 1: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the texts.
Question 2
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R4 (25 marks):
2(a)(i) R1 1
2(a)(ii) R1 1
2(a)(iii) R1 1
2(a)(iv) R1 1
2(b)(i) R2 1
2(b)(ii) R2 1
2(b)(iii) R2 1
Total 25
2(a)(i) Identify a word or phrase from the text which suggests the same idea as the 1
words underlined:
The writer felt that the training presentation had been designed to
emphasise that the least attractive job on the resort was being a liftie.
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
correct answer.
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
correct answer.
2(a)(iii) The writer struggled to walk, almost falling, as he arrived back at his 1
accommodation.
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
correct answer.
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
correct answer.
2(b)(i) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the words 1
underlined:
overlooked: fail(ed) to notice / (cho(o)se to) ignore / do not punish / tacitly allow /
do not acknowledge
2(b)(ii) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the words 1
underlined:
2(b)(iii) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the words 1
underlined:
• avoided: kept away from / did not go near / stay off / steered clear of
2(c) Use one example from the text below to explain how the writer suggests his 3
opinion of the training provided. Use your own words in your explanation.
Our Lift Supervisor (‘Boss’) marched us around every lift in the ski-field. ‘So
now you know the lifts,’ he informed us. ‘See you all bright and early
tomorrow!’ And that was it: training was over! I’d never pushed a button,
had only the flimsiest concept how a ski lift even worked, much less how to
fix one if something went wrong, didn’t know how to test the equipment, use
the radio in case of emergency or assist guests on and off the lift. Ski lifts
spin all day, every hour transporting skiers and riders of all ability levels up
the mountain. I didn’t know how many things I didn’t know about my new job
– but suspected there were plenty.
Award 3 marks for an appropriate example with a comprehensive explanation
which shows understanding of how the writer suggests his opinion of the training
provided.
Award 2 marks for an appropriate example and attempt at an explanation which
shows some understanding of how the writer suggests his opinion of the training
provided.
Award 1 mark for an example with an attempt at an explanation which shows
awareness of his opinion of the training provided. The explanation may be partial.
The explanation must be predominantly in the candidate’s own words.
Responses might use the following:
• marched us around: moved speedily around as a group, like soldiers,
unquestioning and not allowed time to look carefully or follow up individual
concerns.
• he informed us: cursory and factual assertion, has in reality provided little
detail of information, clearly feels this was inadequate preparation, not inviting
question or contradiction.
• And that was it – training was over!: astonishment that no further details
were offered, shock; brevity of statement reflecting brevity of training.
• I’d never pushed a button: completely inexperienced – lacks even the basic
skills / knowledge. Feels completely ill-equipped due to the lack of training to
compensate for this.
• only the flimsiest concept how a ski lift even worked: rudimentary
knowledge / understanding – wouldn’t stand up to scrutiny / insubstantial.
Feels inadequate to fulfil the responsibilities of the job.
• Ski lifts spin all day, every hour: relentless nature of the job / no breaks or
down time/ feels the pressure to perform consistently / a dizzying effect of the
endless motion of the lifts / hyper awareness of the number of people using
the lifts.
• I didn’t know how many things I didn’t know: he is aware there are risks,
known unknowns, and is unsettled not to have been prepared for those, or
have any sense of how many there are; training has been worse than useless
as he is now concerned at how much it didn’t cover.
Where a candidate selects the long sentence beginning ‘I’d never pushed...’, credit
understanding of the effect of listing all the things he has no knowledge or
experience of / evidence of panic and awareness of his own ignorance and inability
to do the job.
Explain how the writer uses language to convey meaning and to create
effect in these paragraphs. Choose three examples of words or phrases
from each paragraph to support your answer. Your choices should include
the use of imagery.
This question is marked for the ability to select powerful or unusual words and for
an understanding of ways in which the language is effective. Expect responses to
provide words / phrases that carry connotations additional to general meaning.
Mark holistically for the overall quality of the response, not for the number of
words chosen, bearing in mind that for the higher bands there should be a range
of choices to demonstrate an understanding of how language works, and that this
should include the ability to explain images. It is the quality of the analysis that
attracts marks. Do not deduct marks for inaccurate statements; simply ignore
them.
The following notes are a guide to what good responses might say about the
selections.
Candidates can make any sensible comment, but only credit those that are
relevant to the correct meanings of the words in the context and that have some
validity. Alternative acceptable explanations should be credited. Credit comments
on effects created by non-vocabulary choices such as grammar / syntax and
punctuation devices. These must be additional to comments on vocabulary.
Paragraph 6 begins ‘Next morning ...’ and is about the process of getting up
and down the mountain each day.
Overview: contrast between the natural power, magic and art of nature and
insignificant human action
• assembled: gathered; like an army setting out to face something challenging;
organised like a practiced drill
• armed ourselves for combat: got the tools they needed to clear ice off; a
military exercise; equipped as if for battle; job taken seriously
• our opponents (were the lift chairs): fighting the chairs, enemy; stresses they
are formidable opposition
• (turned into) fantastic frozen sculptures: became covered in ice; mystical,
magical, artistic, impressive like an exhibition
• relentless weather, coupled with dramatically sub-zero temperatures:
fiercely cold, extremely low temperatures almost unreal, constantly severe
conditions, emphasizes the difficulty and unpleasantness of the job
• transformed these humble (steel and wooden frames): changed what
seemed like ordinary objects into a different state, metamorphosis
• a series of massive ice-monoliths: like large upright pillars of rock/ice
imposing, prehistoric / magical / makes them seem small and insignificant in
comparison
• layered and carved by snow and wind into intricate abstract shapes:
details and delicacy of design, as if chiseled by an artist, weirdness of shapes
• breathtakingly beautiful, and a pain to clear: amazing to look at, but
difficult to clear off; contrast between what they look like and the trouble they
cause
• allocated stations at given points: each sent to specific positions, no
negotiation or flexibility, military process, rigid arrangement
• (inventively-named) Giant ski-slope: the ski slope is huge as the name
indicates, sarcastic tone suggests lack of imagination on the part of those in
charge, crass to name something so powerful and imposing in such basic
terms
Only credit comments on stylistic effect where these are explicitly linked to choices.
Only credit comments on stylistic effect where these are explicitly linked to choices.
2 4–6 • The response provides a mixture of appropriate choices and words that
communicate less well.
• The response may correctly identify linguistic devices but not explain why they
are used.
• Explanations may be few, general, slight or only partially effective.
• They may repeat the language of the original or do not refer to specific words.
Note: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the texts.
Question 3
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R3 (15 marks):
and writing assessment objectives W1, W2, W3, W4 and W5 (10 marks):
3 You are a journalist writing an article about the job of a ski-lift attendant 25
(liftie) as part of a series on interesting seasonal jobs for young people.
Base your article on what you have read in Text C, but be careful to use
your own words. Address each of the three bullet points.
Use the Marking Criteria for Question 3 (Table A, Reading and Table B Writing)
Candidates should select ideas from the text (see below) and develop them
relevantly, supporting what they write with details from the text. Look for an
appropriate register for the genre, and a clear and balanced response which
covers the three areas of the question, is well sequenced, and is in the
candidate’s own words.
A2: what being a liftie involves and what might appeal to young people about this
job
• crewing the ski lift (det. allocated a lift station, tiny booth, testing the
equipment, helping guests on and off, early mornings, lifts work all day) [dev.
responsible for safe operation of that station]
• knowing how a lift works (det. need to fix the lift if something goes wrong)
[dev. skills develop with experience rather than training]
• working with a partner (det. cover for each other, colder being the person at
the top) [dev. need to be able to manage the job alone, work together to
enable fun]
• chance to snowboard at work (det. quick-laps tolerated by boss) [dev. extra
bonus, not really part of the job description]
• dealing with emergencies (det. radio, assisting guests) [dev. adventure /
variety]
• amazing sights (det. beautiful ice ‘sculptures’ of chair lifts) [dev. unexpected,
appreciating the power of nature / life-changing experience]
3 A3: what someone might find challenging about working as a liftie and advice for
any young person considering applying for any job at this resort
• weather (det. clearing ice from chairs in morning is hard work, very cold,
storms, strong winds, get freezing despite wearing layers) [dev. can be
extreme at times / not unusual to be stranded / can be miserable / need to be
physically strong]
• training (det. brief, few details explained beforehand, no hands-on or
practical training) [dev. expected to learn on the job and get on with it / can
feel completely out of depth]
• understanding the jargon: (det. ‘quick-laps’, ‘Back country’, ‘The base’)
[dev. feeling excluded / cool when you get it though / do some research
before]
• supervisor(s) (det. Boss) [dev. expect you to do as you are told, does not
encourage you to ask questions / Boss not phased or empathetic about
dangerous situations]
• consider whether inside or outside (det. might prefer life as an indoor
employee, cleaner inside) [dev. not just about the job but about where you do
it, indoor jobs have an easier life]
• accommodation (det. inside jobs get free onsite lodging, lifties competing
with backpackers for cheaper accommodation) [dev. can be difficult to find
reasonable priced accommodation locally / start looking early]
5 13–15 • The response reveals a thorough evaluation and analysis of the text.
• Developed ideas are sustained and well related to the text.
• A wide range of ideas is applied.
• There is supporting detail throughout, which is well integrated into the response,
contributing to a strong sense of purpose and approach.
• All three bullets are well covered.
• A consistent and convincing voice is used.
4 10–12 • The response demonstrates a competent reading of the text with some evidence
of basic evaluation or analysis.
• A good range of ideas is evident.
• Some ideas are developed but the ability to sustain them may not be consistent.
• There is frequent, helpful supporting detail, contributing to a clear sense of
purpose.
• All three bullets are covered.
• An appropriate voice is used.
2 4–6 • There is some evidence of general understanding of the main ideas, although
the response may be thin or in places lack focus on the text or the question.
• Some brief, straightforward reference to the text is made.
• There may be some reliance on lifting from the text.
• One of the bullets may not be addressed.
• The voice might be inappropriate.
1 1–3 • The response is either very general, with little reference to the text, or a
reproduction of sections of the original.
• Content is either insubstantial or unselective.
• There is little realisation of the need to modify material from the text.
3 5–6 • Language is clear but comparatively plain and/or factual, expressing little
opinion.
• Ideas are rarely extended, but explanations are adequate.
• Some sections are quite well sequenced but there may be flaws in structure.
• Minor, but more frequent, errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar