Structures Design Manual
Structures Design Manual
19
VTrans
Structures
Design
Manual
By the VTrans Structures Section
Fifth Edition
VTrans
Structures
Design Manual
SD5-2014.2.19
Fifth Edition
Copyright © 2010
All rights reserved. This guide or any part thereof may not be reproduced in any form without the
written permission of the Vermont Agency of Transportation.
Information contain in this work has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. State of
Vermont shall not be responsible for any errors, omissions or damages arising out of this errant
information. VTrans has published this work with the following understanding: though the requirements
herein must be followed for projects constructed in Vermont, in all cases, Engineering Judgment shall be
used and communicated. VTrans is not rendering engineering or other professional services with this
guideline. If such services are required, please seek an appropriate professional.
3.10 FORCE EFFECTS DUE TO SUPERIMPOSED DEFORMATIONS (TU, TG, SH, CR AND SE) .......... 3-32
3.10.1 Thermal Forces.................................................................................................................................... 3-32
4.6 RAILROAD BRIDGES & BRIDGES OR STRUCTURES NEAR RAILROADS ....................................... 4-4
12.4 METAL PIPE, PIPE ARCH, AND ARCH STRUCTURES ...................................................................... 12-2
12.4.1 General ................................................................................................................................................ 12-2
15.2 LOAD RATING METHODOLOGY FOR HIGHWAY PROJECTS/ EXISTING BRIDGES .................. 15-1
15.2.1 Vehicular Live Loads .......................................................................................................................... 15-3
15.2.1.1 Rating in Tons ............................................................................................................................. 15-3
The Structures Section has based the content of this manual on the LRFD design philosophy as published by
AASHTO.
The timely issuance of new or revised specifications, direction, guidance, or procedure for design of
highway structures and Structure Section Projects until such time that the material is incorporated into the
Structures Manual, Standard Specifications or other document.
To announce the issuance of new or revised detail sheets, standard drawings, and CADD cells
To announce the latest revision of design software and in-house developed spreadsheets or MathCAD
worksheets
To forward technical advisories or requirements from other VTrans Sections or Divisions, FHWA or
AASHTO
The Structures Section intends the SEI process to supplement VTrans Policy and PDD Procedure. In the case of a
conflict between information contained in a SEI and VTrans Policy or PDD Procedure, the VTrans Policy or PDD
Procedure shall govern.
A SEI remains "in-force" or "active" until the Structures Section incorporates the body of the SEI in a new
Specification, a Structures Manual revision or other official document. The Structures Section may reissue or amend
a SEI into a new SEI, which will subsequently update and replace the existing. A SEI may be retired (superseded) as
deemed necessary by the Structures Program Manager.
Through their Project Manager or Supervisor, anyone in the Structures Section may recommend a subject for
issuance as a SEI to the Structures Program Manager. When bringing such matters forward, the staff member shall
include the following:
Proposed wording for the SEI, including content with any interpretations and proposed direction
Whenever practical, Project Managers will receive circulated draft SEIs for their comments prior to the Structures
Section issuing a final draft.
Approved SEIs will be distributed electronically and available on the VTrans internet as soon as possible.
1
Policy as stated in Structures Engineering Instructions 07-001 (10/30/07)
1-2 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Design work relating to the maintenance or rehabilitation of existing bridges, earth-retaining structures, and buried
structures not located on the NHS, and historic trusses and historic arches regardless of location may be exempted
from this requirement.
Design work related to the maintenance or rehabilitation projects based on the AASHTO Standard Specifications
shall use the Allowable Stress Design (ASD) methodology.
2
Not yet applicable for railroad bridges.
Section 1: DESIGN INTRODUCTION 1-3
1.4 REFERENCES
1.4.1 Roadway Geometrics
The Vermont State Standards for the Design of Transportation Construction, Reconstruction and
Rehabilitation on Freeways, Roads and Streets – or simply The Vermont State Standards.
AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets – or simply AASHTO Green Book.
o http://www.aot.state.vt.us/planning/documents/highresearch/publications/pub.htm
1.4.2 Structural
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications – or simply LRFD
Section 2: GENERAL DESIGN AND DETAILS 2-1
Any banking transition used on the structure must be a straight line to avoid discontinuities in the deck
cross-slope. Avoid banking reversals where possible.
Whether a gravel road is in a normal crown or banked, the slope used shall continue at a straight line
between the centerline and the face of rail. The result will be no break at the theoretical edge of traveled
way.
Design Bridge decks on a straight cross-slope, with no parabolic curve. This applies to all designs, whether
on gravel or paved roads.
For shoulders 6 feet or wider, the shoulder may be broken with its own slope of 4.0%. This applies to the
shoulder width on normal sections and if no part of the structure is in transition.
Proximity to an intersection
2.1.2 Clearances
Navigational clearances for crossings over navigable waterways shall be by permit obtained from the U.S. Coast
Guard.
Railroad clearance requirements shall be according to American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way
Association [AREMA] or as required by individual railroad involved.
2.1.2.1 Waterways
Determine minimum vertical clearances over waterways from hydraulics, geometric and navigational concerns.
Determine minimum horizontal clearance over waterways from the Hydraulic Unit’s considerations.
5 V.S.A. § 3670 (b): Subject to the approval of the transportation board, a variance from the standards established by
this section may be established by written agreement from VTrans, all involved railroad companies and any affected
municipality.
Horizontal clearances at highway structures over or adjacent to railroads shall be in accordance to AREMA and are
subject to railroad approval.
1
Rentz, Henry H., Vertical Clearance, Interstate System Coordination of Design Exceptions, September 17, 1999.
Accompanied form (SDTE-SA) March 19, 2008
2
AASHTO, Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Washington, D.C.: AASHTO, 2004: p. 763
Section 2: GENERAL DESIGN AND DETAILS 2-3
Show the clear zone distances on the layout sheets and on the typical section at the preliminary plan submittal.
Delineate the minimum clear zone distance on the layout by a line consisting of a repeating pattern of two dots and a
dash and labeled with a “CZ” ( ). The delineation of the clear zone should begin at the “Begin
Project Station” and end at the “End Project Station”. Do not show clear zone delineation behind bridge rail; the
clear zone stops at the beginning of the bridge rail and starts again after the end of the bridge rail.
Clear zones delineation lines shall run parallel to the centerline. The delineation lines shall run perpendicular to the
centerline, where the clear zone width changes. Some reasons for changing the clear zone distance include guardrail,
change of design speed, climbing lanes or sight distance issues. The clear zone behind guardrail will be the dynamic
deflection distance. However, the full clear zone distance should extend approximately 50 feet along the guardrail
from the terminal end.
Refer to the Bridge Inspection Files for the bridge functional classification. VTrans Functional
Classification Maps published in 2004 or after, shows State and Town Highways that are on the Federal or
State system in various classifications:
Minor Arterial
Major Collector
Minor Collector
2-4 VTrans Structures Design Manual
The Agency refers to Town Highways on the Federal system as Federal Aid Secondary (FAS) routes
Town Highways not shown on the map that are not on the State System are “Local Road”
Use the design criteria in the Vermont State Standards for the highway classification shown on the map for
the highway in question. If the Functional Classification Map does not include the roadway, consider it a
“Local Road” as specified in Section 6.0 of the Vermont State Standards, giving focus to the requirements
of Section 6.14.
Use Table 6.3 of the Vermont State Standards to select the bridge width on local roads. Use Table 5.3 to
select the widths for bridges on collector highways.
Any new bridge not meeting the minimum width from the appropriate table requires an approval as a
design exception. See Section 2.2.1.
On a local road with an ADT of up to 50 or for roadways not shown on the Functional Classification Map,
consider using a design exception allowing the use of a one-lane bridge, a minimum of 16' (for farm or
other large equipment). See Section 2.2.1.
Use the projected [future] ADT and DHV traffic information for width selection. Provide the best estimate
of the construction year when requesting traffic data. The design year will be 10 years beyond the estimated
date for rehabilitation projects and 20 years beyond for new construction.
In general, use sidewalks only where sidewalks exist on the approaches or on the existing bridge. At times,
local needs may require adding a sidewalk where none existed or vice-versa.
Minimum approach lengths typically extend 50 feet beyond the back of abutment. The designer shall provide a
transition detail from the bridge width to the existing roadway width. The maximum rate of width transition is 1:25.
Properly indicating these locations on the plans will help a future designer tie in their project to the current project.
The proper location of these points also aid in writing permits during the project scoping process.
Design speed and the reason for its selection. Include the references to the appropriate tables in the
Vermont State Standards and the Green Book.
Horizontal and vertical alignment criteria, using references to the Vermont State Standards and the Green
Book as necessary
Maximum banking with reference to the appropriate tables. Include any notations as to conditions that have
warranted elimination or modification of the banking.
The Structures Section allows minor deviations from the accepted standards listed in section 2.1.1.1 with sufficient
justification and with an approved design exception. The Vermont State Standards supersede the AASHTO Green
Book, therefore design exceptions will only be necessary in those situations where the design criteria do not fall
within the acceptable range of possible values and combinations covered by The Vermont State Standards. Refer to
the VTrans Policy on Design Exceptions for more information and the process for obtaining an exception.
2-6 VTrans Structures Design Manual
R
R
E
E
BRE ULDE
BRE ULDE
LIN
LIN
AK
AK
SHO
SHO
3'-7" 3'-7"
STATION STATION
TO WW TO WW
WP CORNER WP CORNER
WP LBRG
C WP
WP
WP
AIL
Y
Y
ER
A
A
DW
DW
G
L ROA
RID
L ROA
FB
C
C
EO
FAC
Figure 2.3.1-1 Deck on Beam Bridge Layout Figure 2.3.1-2 Concrete Slab, Two Cell Box or Two Cell
Frame
AIL
ER F
Y
IDG O
A
BR ACE
DW
OA
3'-7"
F
L R
C
KL R
INE
EA DE
BR OUL
STATION
SH
WP WP
THALWEG WP
(TYP)
KL R
INE
EA DE
BR OUL
SH
2.3.2.2 Askew
Askew is the compliment angle of the skew. See Figure 2.3.2-1.
RE
TU
C
U
TR
BS
SU
LC
ASKEW
STATIONING
BRIDGE
CHORD
E
AD
BL
OW
PL
OW
SN
SKEW
(Ө)
The designer must also consider other factors regarding the alignment of the snowplow blade with the bridge joint.
Such factors include the width of the bridge joint; the plow truck path may not necessarily align with the bridge
centerline when it passes over the joint or snowplow blades may be slightly misaligned.
3
Policy as stated in Structures Engineering Instructions 08-003 (3/31/08)
2-8 VTrans Structures Design Manual
In consideration of these variables, the following skew restrictions apply on new bridges when mechanical or wide
plug joints are required: (See Figure 2.3.2-1)
Skews (Ө) to avoid: 32° to 34° and 40° to 42° to the right
Because Local municipalities utilize equipment that is similar to that used by the VTrans Operations Division, these
restrictions apply to all bridges designed for all of the bridge programs. The Structures Section extends these
restrictions to left skews for bridges on the Interstate System, or other divided two-lane highways, which requires
maintenance using left angled plows.
The Structures Section does not restrict the skew when using narrow saw cut pavement joints for bridge projects.
The skew (Ө) restrictions do not apply for rehabilitation bridge projects.
Bridges that have skew angles within the restricted range, either a bridge rehabilitation project or a new bridge
design which have a skew restriction exemption, the bridge joint shall be marked with delineators designed in
consultation with the Operations Division. In these special cases, the designer should consider design features that
minimize possible damage to the joint and maintenance equipment.
Avoid using expansion joints, if possible. If the design requires the use of expansion joints, the selection of the joint
type is dependent on the length of span and total movement required.
2.5.2.1 Type A
Use the Type A bridge end detail for Integral Abutment bridges with approach slabs. For short spans, use the Type
C bridge end detail as an option. See Figure 2.5.2.1 -1.
2.5.2.2 Type B
A Type B bridge end detail is similar to Type A (See Section 2.5.2.1) for an integral abutment end detail however
without approach slabs. See Figure 2.5.2.2 -1.
2.5.2.3 Type C
Use the Type C bridge end detail for fixed and expansion ends for short spans with approach slabs, with cast in
place concrete or precast voided slab decks. Use this bridge end detail for short span integral abutment bridges as
well. See Figure 2.5.2.3 -1.
2.5.2.4 Type D
Use the Type D bridge end detail for fixed and expansion ends for short spans without approach slabs, including cast
in place concrete slabs, precast voided slabs and box beam decks. Use this bridge end detail for short span integral
abutment bridges as well. See Figure 2.5.2.4 -1.
2.5.2.5 Type E
A Type E bridge end detail applies to both fixed and expansion ends for intermediate spans using spread beams
without approach slab. See Figure 2.5.2.5 -1
2.5.2.6 Type F
A Type F bridge end detail applies to fix and expansion ends of intermediate spans using spread beams with
approach slab. See Figure 2.5.2.6 -1.
2.5.2.7 Type G
Use a Type G bridge end detail for the fixed end of spread beam decking on long spans with approach slabs. For
butted box beam decks, use this bridge end detail for the fixed end, when skews are greater than 30°. See Figure
2.5.2.7 -1.
2.5.2.8 Type H
Use a Type H bridge end detail for the expansion end of spread beam decking on long spans with approach slabs.
For butted box beam decks, use this bridge end detail for the expansion end, when skews are greater than 30°. See
Figure 2.5.2.8 -1.
2.5.2.9 Type I
Use a Type I bridge end detail for spread beam decking of long spans without approach slabs. For butted box beam
decks, use this bridge end detail for the expansion end, when skews are greater than 30°. Specify this bridge end
detail for both fixed and expansion ends on gravel roadways. Use this detail for the fixed end and the Type H detail
for the expansion end on paved highways. See Figure 2.5.2.9 -1.
Section 2: GENERAL DESIGN AND DETAILS 2-11
“B”
Following the Simplified Design Criteria
SHORT
YES YES
Span ≤ 50’ Approach
(15m) Slabs “C”
NO NO
“D”
“D”
YES YES NO
Span ≤ 90’ Approach
“E”
SPAN
Skew ≤ 30°
(27m) Slabs
NO NO YES
NO
Butted
Beams “F”
YES
YES
Approach Fix: “G”
Slabs Exp: “H”
LONG
NO “I”
Fix: “D”
Exp: “I”
1. Integral Abutments shall be the first choice when selecting a bridge type. This flow chart only addressed the
simplified design method as presented in the VTrans Structures’ Integral Abutment Design Guide. For bridges that
do not comply with the criteria for the Simplified Design Method, use additional considerations to design them with
Integral Abutment.
2. Though the skew exceeds 20°, using Integral Abutments is possible using additional design considerations
Figure 2.5.2.1 -1 Type A – Bridge Ends for Integral Abutment Bridges with Approach Slabs.
C
L
BEGIN/END BRIDGE TRANSVERSE
BEARING
DECK JOINT
(PAVEMENT)
CONC DECK
GRAVEL
12" x 12" (300 mm X 300 mm)
FILLET
WATER STOP
½ WIDTH OF ABUTMENT
SCORE MARK
ABUTMENT
Figure 2.5.2.2 -1 Type B - Bridge Ends for Integral Abutment Bridges without Approach Slabs.
Section 2: GENERAL DESIGN AND DETAILS 2-13
C
L
BEGIN/END BRIDGE BEARING
PAVEMENT
APPROACH 12"
SLAB C-I-P CONCRETE SLAB
OR VOIDED SLAB
1
O
N
1
PROVIDE BOND
BREAKER
FOR C-I-P CONCRETE
1'-6" MIN.
1
O
N
1" PLASTIC TUBE 1
ON LOW CORNERS
ABUTMENT
#8 DOWELS @ 18"
(EPOXY COATED)
WRAP END WITH
PIPE INSULATION
Figure 2.5.2.3 -1 Type C – Bridge Ends (both abutments) for short spans with Approach Slabs.
PROVIDE BOND
C BREAKER
BEGIN/END BRIDGE L
BEARING
(PAVEMENT)
ABUTMENT
Figure 2.5.2.4 -1 Type D - Bridge Ends for short spans without Approach Slabs.
2-14 VTrans Structures Design Manual
BEGIN/END BRIDGE
BEGIN/END BRIDGE
1’’ X 1’’ CHAMFER
8"
GRAVEL GRAVEL
SPREAD
STEEL OR P/S
CURTAIN CONCRETE CURTAIN
2" CLOSED CELL FOAM WALL BEAMS WALL
WATERSTOP
½’’ EXP.
MATL.
ABUTMENT
Figure 2.5.2.5 -1 Type E – Bridge Ends for intermediate spans without Approach Slabs.
Figure 2.5.2.6 -1 Type F – Bridge Ends for intermediate spans with Approach Slabs.
Section 2: GENERAL DESIGN AND DETAILS 2-15
Figure 2.5.2.7 -1 Type G – Bridge End for Long Spans with Spread Beam Decking or Intermediate Spans with
Butted Box Beams decking, both with Approach Slabs.
2-16 VTrans Structures Design Manual
BEGIN/END BRIDGE
C
L EXP. BRG.
PAVEMENT PROVIDE
BOND BREAKER
EXPANSION
JOINT DECK
APPROACH SLAB (SEE SECTIONS 5
AND 6 FOR MORE
DETAILS)
SPREAD
6" X ½" EXP. 6"
STEEL OR P/S
MATL. CONCRETE
BEAMS OR
1" DRAIN TUBE BUTTED
CORNERS ON LOW BACKWALL BOX BEAM
2’ – 3” (MIN)
#8 DOWELS @ 18" DIAPHRAGM
EPOXY COATED
WRAP END W/PIPE
INSULATION (TYP)
1'-6" MIN.
SMOOTH EDGES
O
N
1
ABUTMENT
Figure 2.5.2.8 -1 Type H – Bridge End for Long Spans with Spread Beam Decking or Intermediate Spans with
Butted Box Beams decking, both with Approach Slabs.
Section 2: GENERAL DESIGN AND DETAILS 2-17
Figure 2.5.2.9 -1 Type I – Expansion and Fixed Bridge Ends for Long Span Spread Beam Decking without
Approach Slabs of any skew or for the Expansion End of Butted Box Beam Decks with skews greater than 30°.
Grooving of the deck is used to provide appropriate friction for dry and wet pavement while still keeping a low-
noise surface. A proper combination of macrotexture and microtexture (wavelengths of 0.5mm to 50mm and 1µm to
0.5mm, respectively) while limiting megatexture (wavelengths of 50mm to 500mm) can provide the texture needed
for both adequate wet pavement friction and low noise. All bare concrete decks shall, as a minimum, have the
surface textured by means of a broom finish. Bridges with design speeds greater than 45 miles per hour or with a
radius of curvatures less than 1640 feet shall also be tined or grooved. Other situations may warrant tining or
grooving the bridge deck.4
4
Surface Texture for Asphalt and Concrete Pavements: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/t504036.cfm
Surface Finishing of PPC Pavements: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/policy/sa_96_06.htm
2-18 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Where expected expansion exceeds ⅛ inch, use an asphaltic plug joint (see Section 14.2.1.3 ). The asphaltic plug
joint will accommodate expansion up to 1 inch. When the expected expansion movement exceeds this, a mechanical
expansion device will be required. Use an asphaltic plug joint at the ends of approach slabs for integral abutment
bridges to accommodate the relative movement at this location. See Sections 14.2.1.1 and 14.2.1.2 . In this case, the
expansion device should be proceeded by and followed by an 11 inch wide raised concrete step, the height of the
pavement plus up to ⅛ inch. Detail the sheet membrane waterproofing and pavement up to and from the vertical
faces of these steps.
The bridge end details presented in Section 2.5.2, as well as those presented in Sections 5 and 6 require additional
detailing to show the pavement application requirements.
Anchor bolts, steel plates, nuts, and washers shall be paid for as part of Item 510.20, Prestressed Concrete
Member and shall meet the following requirements:
Each anchor bolt shall have a single nut. On the expansion end, the Contractor shall hand tighten the nut
and then loosened it by ½ turn. On the fixed end, the Contractor shall tighten the nut.
All anchor bolts, and nuts shall be ANSI A449, and all washers shall be AASHTO M270 Grade 50, unless
otherwise noted.
Pave the approach slabs with the top two lifts (approx. 3” ) of roadway bituminous concrete pavement
Y A
DW
C ROA
A
LON
G ITU
DIN
H
A LR
B
NGT
EIN
CUR
T
FOR
RCE SE
MEN
CEM
B LE
ENT
R
SKEW
OF
REI ANSVE
SLA
E
FAC
NFO
TR
C BRG
A
PLAN
NTS
FINISHED
GRADE
TRANSVERSE REINFORCING
BITUMINOUS
12"
ABUTMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (TYP)
END
OVERALL
GRANULAR BACKFILL DEPTH
OR BORROW LONGITUDINAL
REINFORCING
SECTION A-A
NTS
3” of pavement
Impact = 33%
Bottom Transverse
Reinforcement #5 @ 12” Epoxy #5 @ 12” Epoxy #5 @ 12” Epoxy
Situations where the designer shall consider paving bridge decks are as follows:
Butted prestressed voided slab or box beam bridge decks without an overlay
On all bridge projects specifying a paved deck, use an applied membrane between the deck and the pavement. At
this time, the preferred pavement mix is Bituminous Concrete Pavement Type IVS, also referred to as superpave;
however, Marshal Mix (Type IV) may also be specified. Typical total pavement thickness on new bridge projects is
3 inches, placed in two lifts of 1½ inches for Type IVS each, or a total thickness of 2½ inches placed in two lifts of
1¼ inches for Type IV each.
Design all decks with a wearing surface dead load according to Section 3.3.2 Design Pavement Thickness.
The thickness of the approach slab pavement on bare decks shall meet the following criteria:
Roadways designed with the Simplified Design Procedure for Bridge Projects shall continue the two top
lifts of Type IVS or Type IV over the approach slabs.
For projects with a specific pavement design, continue the full depths of Type III or Type IV lifts over the
approach slabs with consideration of the first bullet.
For paved decks, the thickness of the approach slab pavement shall match the bridge pavement thickness (see
Section 2.7.2).
For Prestressed multi-beam deck units on low volume paved town highways, the designer may choose to eliminate
the concrete overlay and use a waterproofing membrane and pavement.
’The Contractor may substitute subbase material for the sand borrow shown on the Plans. The subbase material shall
meet the type specified in the Contract and placed to meet the subbase specifications. If placement of subbase is in
lieu of sand borrow, place a geotextile meeting the requirements of item 649.11 “Geotextile for Road Bed
Separator” between the subgrade and the subbase material. All costs associated with the substitution including the
geotextile shall be incidental to 203.31 “Sand Borrow”.’
For projects in the early stages of design, the designer should consider using the subbase material in lieu of the sand
borrow to achieve the necessary frost protection. In this case, the designer should specify the use of a roadbed
separator geotextile between the subbase and subgrade and that work paid under the item 649.11 “Geotextile for
Road Bed Separator”.
5
Policy as stated in Structures Engineering Instructions 09-002 (3/4/09)
2-22 VTrans Structures Design Manual
When specifying a cofferdam on the plans, VTrans will be paying for all excavation and removal of existing
structure within the defined limits of the cofferdam under "Cofferdam Excavation – Rock".
VTrans will pay for any removal of existing structure outside the limits of the cofferdam and within the limits of the
appropriate unclassified excavation item. Clearly define the limits for these items on the plans.
Specify that the payment for any portion of the existing structure requiring removal, which falls outside the limits of
the excavation items, will be made under either “Removal of Structure” or “Partial Removal of Structure”.
FINISH
GRADE
4'-0"
SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUBBASE
MATERIAL
LIMITS OF EXISTING
GRANULAR BORROW
GROUND
1. 5
LIMITS OF
1 UNCLASS. CHANNEL
EXCAVATION
LIMITS OF
GRANULAR BACKFILL
FOR STRUCTURES
STONE FILL
COFFERDAM LIMITS
SEE NOTES
The pay limits of “Cofferdam Excavation, Earth” and “Cofferdam Excavation, Rock” shall be 2 feet
outside the perimeter of the footing.
If the constructed cofferdam is larger than the cofferdam excavation pay limits, provide payment for all unclassified
channel excavation, including that portion which is inside the cofferdam but outside the cofferdam excavation pay
limits, at the contract unit price for “Unclassified Channel Excavation”.
Continue stone fill to one foot below existing ground or one foot above design flow elevation, whichever is
lower.
Do not place grubbing materials on the stone fill directly under the bridge. Whenever channel slope
intersects roadway subbase, grubbing material shall begin at the bottom of subbase.
EXISTING * GRUBBING
GROUND MATERIAL 1'-0"
ORDINARY (TYP.)
HIGH WATER
UNCLASSIFIED
(TYP.) (TYP.) CHANNEL EXCAVATION
(TYP.)
Vermont generally uses all load combinations presented in the LRFD Specifications LRFD 3.4.1. Strength-II and
Extreme Event-I load combinations however, are rarely considered. These limit states are used only for specialized
structures or situations. See Figure 3.2 -1. The designer may ignore the AASHTO LRFD wind load on live load
provisions when designing a covered bridge that has sufficient siding to shield the live load. In these cases, the
designer shall use the wind load provisions found in the 2006 International Building Code to calculate wind load
effects. Using the appropriate load paths, the designer shall transmit these load effects to the deck as service loads.
In turn, factor these load effects according to AASHTO LRFD load combinations.
Bridge Type
Reinforced Prestressed Concrete
Limit State Concrete Concrete Steel Columns
STRENGTH I X X X X
STRENGTH II O† O† O† O†
STRENGTH III O O X O
STRENGTH IV O O O O
STRENGTH V O O X O
EXTREME EVENT I O O O O
EXTREME EVENT II O O O X
SERVICE I X X X X
SERVICE II X
SERVICE III X
SERVICE IV X
FATIGUE X X X X
† Only when evaluating state defined trucks.
X – Required Default
O – Optional
Strength I: Basic load combination used to determine the flexural and shear demands without wind.
Strength II: Basic load combination used to determine the flexural and shear demands of a structure subject
to a permit vehicle or a special design vehicle specified by the owner. (Vermont uses a special design
vehicle in rare instances.)
Strength III: Load combination used to determine flexural and shear demands that include wind. For
covered bridge design, refer to Section 3.6 .
Strength IV: Load combination relating to very high dead load to live load force effect ratios.
Strength V: Load combination corresponding to normal vehicular use of the bridge concurrent with a wind
of 55 mph.
3-2 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Extreme Event I: Load combination including earthquake effects. Generally, Vermont is in seismic zone 1
(LRFD 3.10.6). The designer need not consider earthquake load effects other than what is required in
LRFD Section 3.10.9.2 for most projects. Some locations may have soil conditions where the designer may
need to follow the requirements of seismic zone 2. For covered bridge design, refer to Section 3.8 in this
manual.
Extreme Event II: Load combination corresponding to ice loads, collision loads, and certain hydraulic
events with a reduced vehicular live load. Use this combination for barrier and deck overhang designs.
Service I: Load combination used for the design of most bridge elements. Use this combination for service
load stress checks (prestressed concrete), deflection checks, crack control checks in reinforced concrete,
etc.
Service II: Load combination used to check yielding and connections in steel structures.
Service III: Load combination used to check nominal tension in prestressed concrete structures.
Fatigue I & II: Load combination used for the fatigue and fracture design of structures subject to repetitive
live load. This pertains primarily to steel structures and steel reinforcement in concrete structures. Fatigue I
is for infinite load-induced fatigue life. Fatigue II is for finite load-induced fatigue life.
Construction: A special load case for structures where construction loads may exceed any of the above load
cases while the bridge is under construction.
For situations when the covered bridge acts as a unit, design according to the following considerations:
Design the runner boards, decking, floor beams, stringers, trusses and bearings with all dead load properly
applied according to the AASHTO LRFD specifications with wind and seismic load effects determined
using the IBC, applied as service loads and factored using the AASHTO LRFD load combinations.
Design the roof and lateral and longitudinal support systems of the bridge housing according to the IBC.
Unit Weight
Material (k/ft³)
Bituminous Wearing Surfaces 0.150
Compacted Fill on Box Culverts 0.130
Reinforced Concrete Lightweight 0.115
Reinforced Concrete Sand-Lightweight 0.125
Reinforced Concrete Normal Weight with
f’c ≤ 5 ksi 0.150
1
Using the unit weight values in the table may be useful in checking some design software. Using a unit weight of
0.150 k/ft³ may be sufficient for most dead load requirements. A more accurately calculated unit weight may be
necessary when calculating the concrete modulus of elasticity – especially for higher strength concrete mixes.
3-4 VTrans Structures Design Manual
35
30 0.478
Backslope Angle (°)
0.385
25
0.338
20
0.311
15
0.294
10
0.286
5
0.283
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
Ka Rankine Coefficient
For all Interstate, Primary, Secondary and Federal Secondary Routes and all Town Highway Routes on-
system and off-system, design new structures for the controlling HL-93 live load as defined in the LRFD
specifications.
When evaluating a structure for load cases involving more than two lanes of traffic use a reduction factor or
multiplier. This factor recognizes the reduced probability that all lanes will be fully loaded at the same
time. Designers should note that the LRFD Specifications require using a factor of 1.2 for the design of
structures carrying a single lane of traffic.
Multiply the live load effects by the Dynamic Load Allowance (IM), which the Standard Specifications
referred to as Impact. LRFD Table 3.6.2.1-1 provides the base dynamic load allowance factors. Designers
should note the reduction of the values for buried components.
Where appropriate consider additional live loads, which may include snow removal equipment on
sidewalks and bridge inspection or snooper loads on bridges with large overhangs. If construction
equipment or maintenance equipment can or will operate adjacent to retaining walls and abutments, a live
load surcharge should be incorporated into the design.
Design retaining walls and abutments with load combinations including live load surcharge. The equivalent soil
heights to be used for different heights of abutments and retaining walls are provided in LRFD Tables 3.11.6.4-1 and
3.11.6.4-2.
Consider two loading cases when designing a conventional beam bridge with a sidewalk:
Use a pedestrian live load on the sidewalk equal to 0.075 ksf and apply it in conjunction with a vehicular
live load in the traffic lanes adjacent to the sidewalk.
Place vehicular live load on the sidewalk and in adjacent traffic lanes with no pedestrian live load on the
sidewalk.
For bridges carrying only pedestrian or bicycle traffic apply a live load of 0.085 k/ft² over the deck.
Do not apply the dynamic load allowance factor to braking forces; however, apply the multiple presence factors.
Assume braking forces act at a height of 6 feet above the roadway surface and in a longitudinal direction. With
elastomeric bearings, apply the force at the bearing.
4 feet
5 kips 5 kips
Ø = angle between direction of flow and longitudinal axis of the pier. Design all piers for a minimum of Ø
= 20°.
V = design velocity of water for the design flood in strength and service limit states and for the check flood
in the extreme event limit state.
The effective velocity shall be that calculated for the applicable Q for the condition under consideration.
Applying wind loads to the live load is not necessary when designing an enclosed covered bridge (see Section
3.6.3.5). Investigate the amount of applied wind pressure on live load in partially enclosed covered bridges.
Section 3: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS 3-7
Figure 3.6.3 -1 provides basic wind speed velocities for the State of Vermont. Towns shown within the Special
Wind Region may have higher velocities. These areas will need further examination for unusual wind conditions. In
considering wind load effects, an exposure category should be determined for each wind direction. Table 3.6.3 -1
offers general descriptions of the typical exposure categories for Vermont.
Exposure Description
B Urban, suburban, wooded areas. (Usually assumed.)
C Open terrain, flat open country, grasslands, shorelines
Flat, unobstructed, exposed to wind flowing over open water
for at least a mile. (Bridge sites located near Lake Champlain
D
where it is possible for winds to flow over the lake for at least
a mile.)
The values in the table are based on the following equation (IBC 2006 equation 16-34):
Canaan
Alburg
Grant
Franklin Derby Norton
Richford Jay Holland
Highgate Berkshire Troy Newport
Averill
Warners
Newport Averys
Warren
Gore
Gore
Morgan
Swanton Sheldon West-
Coventry Lemington
I. La Enosburg Mont- Field Lewis
Motte Charleston
St. Gomery
N. Hero Fairfield Browning-
Albans Irasburg
Bakersfield ton Bloomfield
Lowell Brighton
Belvidere
Westmore
Barton Bruns-
Grand Georgia Ferdinand
Fletcher Water- Albany wick
Isle Eden Newark
Ville
Fairfax Glover
Sutton East
Milton Johnson Craftsbury Haven Maid-
S. Hero Cambridge Hyde
Sheffield stone
Park Greens- Burke
Westford boro Granby
Cornwall Vershire
Randolph
Fair
Salisbury
irle
Handcock
Shoreham
W.
Tunbridge
Fa
W. Haven
Proctor
Rutland Killington
Hartford Notes:
Bridge-
Fair
Castleton
Rutland water 1. Values are nominal design 3-second
Haven W. Rutland City Mendon Woodstock
Hartland gust wind speeds in miles per hour
Poultney Ira ClarendonShrewsbry Plymouth (m/s) at 33 ft (10 m) above ground for
W. Windsor
Middle-
Exposure C category,
Windsor
Reading
town
Springs
Wells Tin- Mt. Holly Caven-
2. Mountainous terrain, gorges and
mouth Wallingford
Lud- dish Weathers- special wind regions shall be examined
low field
Pawlet
Danby
Mt. Tabor
Wes-
Baltimore for unusual wind conditions.
ton
And-
Rupert Dorset
Land-
grove over Chester
Springfield
Basic Wind Speed
Peru
London- Rocking-
Sandgate
Manchester derry
Wind- Grafton
ham = 90 miles/hr (40 m/s)
Winhall ham
Pownal Reads-
Stamford
boro Halifax Guilford
Whitingham
Vernon
Figure 3.6.3 -1 Vermont Basic Wind Speed (3-Second Gust) (2006 International Building Code)
1.00 for non-essential covered bridges. Most covered bridges will fall under this category.
Section 3: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS 3-9
1.15 for essential covered bridges. This case would be rare. In some remote locations, the covered bridge in
this classification may be the only way to access a small community.
The main-force-resisting system, applied to the projected area of the covered bridge normal to the direction
of the wind. Use this pressure in calculating gross forces to determine overall stability of the covered bridge
in sliding, uplift and overturning.
The siding and roofing of the covered bridge (components and cladding). This pressure is the minimum
algebraic difference for each direction of the surface acting normal to that surface. Apply pressures on both
sides of the surface. In this case, the siding must be able to withstand at least a 10 lbs/ft² pressure pushing
on the wall and pulling the wall off.
An area of an open building and other structures (a building with each wall 80% or more open) either
normal to the wind direction or projected on a plane normal to the wind direction. A covered bridge with no
siding may be considered an open building if the projected area of the openings (where wind may pass
through) is at least 80% of the entire projected area. The wind pressure shall be applied to the projected
area of the roof and frame or truss (Af).
3.6.3.4 Anchorage
Anchor each component of the covered bridge sufficiently to provide a continuous load path to the bridge deck or
abutments. These anchorages must resist wind-induced overturning, uplift and sliding. (2006 IBC 1604.9)
The total area of openings in the wall resisting positive wind pressure must exceed the total area of the
remaining openings of the covered bridge by more than 10%.
and
The total area of openings in the wall resisting positive wind pressure must be greater than the lesser of:
With the remaining areas of the openings in the covered bridge not exceeding 20% the total area of the
walls not including Ag.
Aoi = total area of openings in the entire covered bridge (roof and walls) excluding Ao as defined in
Section 3.6.3.5.1 .
Agi = total surface area of covered bridge (roof and walls) excluding Ag as defined in Section 3.6.3.5.1.
Because each side and each end of most covered bridges is identical to its opposite, Ao will always equal Aoi.
Therefore, classifying covered bridges as partially enclosed is unlikely.
To use this section, the covered bridge must be a typical enclosed covered bridges (see Section 3.6.3.5 ) with a roof
pitch equal to or less than 12 on 12 . The width of the bridge must exceed its mean roof height (h). Designs not
complying with these conditions will require additional design considerations from the 2006 IBC or the ASCE 7-05.
Exposure Category: Determine the exposure category in accordance with Section 3.6.3 . For exposure C,
the obtain Kzt from Table 3.6.3.6.1 -1. All other exposure categories, Kzt equals 1.0. Surface wind speeds
tend to rise dramatically over ridges or on the leading edge of an escarpment (see Figure 3.6.3.6.1 -1).
Height and Exposure Adjustment Coefficient (λ): Obtain λ from Table 3.6.3.6.1 -2. Use the mean roof
height [ (ridge height + eave height) / 2 ] to obtain λ.
Obtain the simplified design wind pressure (ps30) for the Main Wind Force Resisting System (MWFRS)
from Table 3.6.3.6.1 -4for each zone (A through H) as shown in Figure 3.6.3.6.1 -2 and Figure 3.6.3.6.1 -3
as it applies to the covered bridge design.
o The tabulated values for horizontal pressures (ps30) (Zones A, B, C and D) represent the net
pressure from both windward and leeward pressures.
o Use Table 3.6.3.6.1 -3 to get roof slope angle from designed roof pitch in 12”.
o For roof slopes above 25°, both the positive internal pressure case (Load Case 1) and the negative
internal pressure case (Load Case 2) must be checked.
o Use the columns for EOH and GOH in Table 3.6.3.6.1 -4 for pressures on overhangs if Zones E or
G (windward edge) extends out to an overhang.
Assume the minimum horizontal pressure on the covered bridge (sum of Zones A, B, C and D) is at least
+10 psf and the vertical pressure on the covered bridge (sum of Zones E, F, G and H) is 0 psf.
Use this data to calculate the bridge housing stability and shear at the housing connection to the bridge deck
or at the housing’s bearings in both longitudinal and transverse directions.
Table 3.6.3.6.1 -2 Adjustment Factor for Covered Bridge Height and Exposure (λ)
2
The table’s basis is ASCE 7-05 Figure 6-4. This table assumes a roadway width of 20 feet on a longitudinal ridge
or aligning the edge of an escarpment. Kzt varies slightly in a 10’+/- from this width.
3-12 VTrans Structures Design Manual
V(z)
Z
V(z)
Z Speed-up
Wind Wind
Escarpment Ridge
H
F
G
E
End Zone
S
C W FR eing
M on B d
i
ect ate
Ref. Corner Dir valu
A E
Eave Height
2a
Figure 3.6.3.6.1 -2 Main Wind Force Resisting System (MWFRS) in Transverse Direction (Source: ASCE 7-05
Figure 6-2)
Section 3: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS 3-13
H
G
F
E
End Zone
θ
D
B C
M
Dir WFR
ect S A
i
Eva on Be Eave Height
lua in
ted g
Ref. Corner
2a
Figure 3.6.3.6.1 -3 Main Wind Force Resisting System (MWFRS) in Longitudinal Direction (Source: ASCE 7-05
Figure 6-2)
3-14 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Table 3.6.3.6.1 -4 Simplified Design Wind Pressure (Main Windforce-Resisting System), ps30 (Exposure B at
h=30ft with Kzt=1.0 and Iw=1.0) (psf)
pnet ≤ -10 psf (in the negative direction) for negative pressures.
Section 3: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS 3-15
o 3 feet.
The mean roof height (h) may equal the eave height for roof angles less than 10°.
Ae = l * be (3.6.3.6.3 -1)
where,
l = Span Length.
be = effective tributary width. This is the greater of the spacing between joists or studding or one-third
the span length.
The effective area required for cladding fasteners (Aef) need not exceed that required for an individual faster.
where,
3
Ocel, Justin M. et al., “Fatigue-Resistant Design for Overhead Signs, Mast-Arm Signal Poles, and Lighting
Standards”, University of Minnesota, Department of Civil Engineering p. 17
3-16 VTrans Structures Design Manual
a a
Figure 3.6.3.6.2 -1 Components and Cladding Pressure (Source: ASCE 7-05 Figure 6-3)
Section 3: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS 3-17
Table 3.6.3.6.3 -1 Net design wind pressure (Component and Cladding), pnet30 (Exposure B at h=30 ft with
IW=1.0) (psf)
Table 3.6.3.6.3 -2 Roof Overhang Net Design Wind Pressure (Component and Cladding), pnet30 (Exposure B at
h=30 ft with IW=1.0) (psf) (ASCE 7-05 Figure 6-3)
Roof 0° to 7°
2 50 -20.1 -24.9 -30.1
2 100 -19.8 -24.4 -29.5
3 10 -34.6 -42.7 -51.6
3 20 -27.1 -33.5 -40.5
3 50 -17.3 -21.4 -25.9
3 100 -10.0 -12.2 -14.8
2 10 -27.2 -33.5 -40.6
2 20 -27.2 -33.5 -40.6
Roof 7° to 27°
Consult the Hydraulics Unit concerning ice thickness, stream conditions, and pier shape and loads.
o In the absence of elevation information, apply ice forces at the elevation of a Q-10 discharge.
Extreme Event Ice loads need not be considered concurrently with Service or Extreme Event scour
conditions.
towns in the Green Mountain Range have snow loads of 70 lb/ft² (see Figure 3.7.2 -1). For these towns, consider
snow loads in the Extreme Event II load combination on bridge.
Canaan
Alburg
Grant
Franklin Derby Norton
Richford Jay Holland
Highgate Berkshire Troy Newport
Averill
Warners
Newport Averys
Warren
Gore
Gore
Morgan
Swanton Sheldon West-
Coventry Lemington
I. La Enosburg Mont- Field Lewis
Motte Charleston
St. Gomery
N. Hero Fairfield Browning-
Albans Irasburg
Bakersfield ton Bloomfield
Lowell Brighton
Belvidere
Westmore
Barton Bruns-
Grand Georgia Ferdinand
Fletcher Water- Albany wick
Isle Eden Newark
Ville
Fairfax Glover
Sutton East
Milton Johnson Craftsbury Haven Maid-
S. Hero Cambridge Hyde
Sheffield stone
Park Greens- Burke
Westford boro Granby
Cornwall Vershire
Randolph
Fair
Salisbury
irle
Handcock
Shoreham
W.
Tunbridge
Fa
Middle-
Windsor
Reading
town
Springs
Wells Tin- Mt. Holly Caven-
mouth Wallingford
Lud- dish Weathers-
Mt. Tabor low field
Pawlet Baltimore
Danby Wes-
ton
And-
Minimum Ground
Land- Springfield
Rupert Dorset grove over Chester
Snow Loads
Peru
London- Rocking-
Sandgate
Manchester derry
Wind- Grafton
ham - 40 lb/ft² (1.9 kN.m²)
Winhall ham
Figure 3.7.2 -1 Minimum Ground Snow Loads (The Vermont Department of Public Safety)
Project elevations above the average for the town in question, may require an increase in snow loads. Contact local
building official or SEAVT. (Structural Engineers Assoc. of VT)
3-20 VTrans Structures Design Manual
where
IS = Importance Factor.
Exposure of Roof
Terrain
Category Fully Partially
Sheltered
Exposed Exposed
B 0.9 1 1.2
C 0.9 1 1.1
D 0.8 0.9 1
(ASCE 7-05 Table 7-2)
Section 3: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS 3-21
1.2
1.0
0.8
All Other
Surfaces
0.6
Unobstructed
Slippery
Cs
Surfaces
0.4
0.2
12 on 12
4 on 12
3 on 12
6 on 12
8 on 12
0.0
-0.2
0° 30° 60° 90°
Roof Slope
Figure 3.7.2.2.1 -1 Roof Factor CS for cold roofs. (ASCE 7-05 Figure 7-2)
For almost every case, a covered bridge is not a bridge with high importance or considered essential. However, in
extreme situations where a covered bridge is on a dead end roadway or where a detour would be excessive if the
project required the removal of the bridge, consider the bridge essential. For bridge classifications, refer to Section
3.8.3.5. The importance factor will be:
1.0 for non-essential covered bridges. Most covered bridges will fall under this category.
1.2 for mandatory covered bridges. Covered bridges typically do not fall under this category.
If W is less than or equal to 20 feet the covered bridge shall be designed with an unbalanced snow load of
Ipg on the leeward side with no load on the windward side.
If W is greater than 20 feet the covered bridge shall be designed with an unbalanced snow load of ps on the
leeward side
8(S0.5)hd / 3. Figure 3.7.2.2.2 -2 provides the value for hd. Design the windward side with an unbalanced
load of 0.3ps. (ASCE 7-05 7.6.1).
θ
he
ps
Balanced
Unbalanced 1.5Ps / Ce
W ≤ 20 ft (6.1 m)
0.3ps
Unbalanced
1.2(1 + (β/2))Ps / Ce
W > 20 ft (6.1 m)
Figure 3.7.2.2.2 -1 Balanced and Unbalanced Snow Loads for Hip and Gable Roofs (ASCE 7-05 Figure 7-5)
Section 3: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS 3-23
12
If l u > 800, use equation
l u = 800
10
600
8 400
300
hd , Drift Height (ft)
6 200
150
100
4
75
50
2 25
Structure Rehabilitation: AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications with interims or the 2007
FHWA/MCEER Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 – Bridges. (See Section 1.3.2)
3-24 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Most bridge designs in Vermont will follow the requirements of Seismic Zone 1. Bridge designs in other
than Bennington and Windham Counties in locations that qualify for Site Class E (weak soils) shall follow
the requirements of Seismic Zone 2. Locations that qualify for Site Class F (peat or very soft clay) will
need a site-specific analysis for Seismic Zone determination. (LRFD Section 3.10.3) Analyze seismic
effects according to the LRFD Specifications. (See LRFD Section 3.10.3.1 for Site Class definitions)
Single span bridges will not require a seismic analysis other than what is required for supports (LRFD
Section 4.7.4.2). Multiple span bridges shall follow the provisions in LRFD Section 4.7.4.3.
For bridge designs in Seismic Zone 1, use a force of 25% of the tributary vertical loads at any reaction as
the horizontal connection restraining force. (LRFD Section 3.10.9.2)
Bridge Designs in Seismic Zone 2 will required more in-depth analysis provided in LRFD Section 3.10.9.3.
Design covered bridges using the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification, the National Design
Specification (NDS) for Wood Construction (LRFD and ASD), the International Building Code and ASCE
7 Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures.
Canaan
Alburg
Grant
Franklin Derby Norton
Richford Jay Holland
Highgate Berkshire Troy Newport
Averill
Warners
Newport Averys
Warren
Gore
Gore
Morgan
Swanton Sheldon West-
Coventry Lemington
I. La Enosburg Mont- Field Lewis
Motte Charleston
St. Gomery
N. Hero Fairfield Browning-
Albans Irasburg
Bakersfield ton Bloomfield
Lowell Brighton
Belvidere
Westmore
Barton Bruns-
Grand Georgia Ferdinand
Fletcher Water- Albany wick
Isle Eden Newark
Ville
Fairfax Glover
Sutton East
Milton Johnson Craftsbury Haven Maid-
S. Hero Cambridge Hyde
Sheffield stone
Park Greens- Burke
Westford boro Granby
Cornwall Vershire
Randolph
Fair
Salisbury
irle
Handcock
Shoreham
W.
Tunbridge
Fa
Middle-
Windsor
Reading
town
Springs 1.0 sec Spectral Response
Wells Tin-
mouth Wallingford
Mt. Holly
Lud-
Caven-
dish Weathers-
Acceleration (S1) (%g)
Mt. Tabor low field
Pawlet Baltimore
Danby
- 10
Wes-
ton
Land- And- Springfield
over Chester
grove
-9
Rupert Dorset
Peru
London- Rocking-
Manchester derry ham
Sandgate
Winhall
Wind- Grafton
ham -8
Athens
West-
-7
Arlington Sunderland Jamaica
Town- minster
Stratton
shend
Wardsboro Brook-
line
Putney
Source: 2006 International
Shaftsbury Glasten- Somer-
bury set
Dover
Newfane
Building Code
Dummers-
ton
Woodford Sears-
burg Wilmington Marlboro
Bennington Brattle-
boro
Pownal Reads-
Stamford
boro Halifax Guilford
Whitingham
Vernon
Figure 3.8.3 -1 Maximum Considered Earthquake ground motion for Vermont of 1.0 sec. Spectral Response
Acceleration (S1) (5 percent of critical damping), Site Class B (2006 International Building Code)
3-26 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Canaan
Alburg
Grant
Franklin Derby Norton
Richford Jay Holland
Highgate Berkshire Troy Newport
Averill
Warners
Newport Averys
Warren
Gore
Gore
Morgan
Swanton Sheldon West-
Coventry Lemington
I. La Enosburg Mont- Field Lewis
Motte Charleston
St. Gomery
N. Hero Fairfield Browning-
Albans Irasburg
Bakersfield ton Bloomfield
Lowell Brighton
Belvidere
Westmore
Barton Bruns-
Grand Georgia Ferdinand
Fletcher Water- Albany wick
Isle Eden Newark
Ville
Fairfax Glover
Sutton East
Milton Johnson Craftsbury Haven Maid-
S. Hero Cambridge Hyde
Sheffield stone
Park Greens- Burke
Westford boro Granby
Cornwall Vershire
Randolph
Fair
Salisbury
irle
Handcock
Shoreham
W.
Tunbridge
Fa
Middle-
0.2 sec Spectral Response
Windsor
Reading
town
Springs
Wells Tin-
mouth Wallingford
Mt. Holly Caven- Acceleration (Ss) (%g)
Lud- dish Weathers-
Mt. Tabor low field
Pawlet Baltimore
Danby Wes-
ton - 50
Land- And- Springfield
over Chester
grove
- 45
Rupert Dorset
Peru
London- Rocking-
Manchester derry ham
Sandgate
Winhall
Wind- Grafton
ham - 40
Athens
West-
- 35
Arlington Sunderland Jamaica
Town- minster
Stratton
shend
Wardsboro Brook-
- 25
Dummers-
ton
Woodford Sears-
burg Wilmington Marlboro
Bennington Brattle-
boro Source: 2003 International
Pownal Stamford
Reads- Building Code
boro Halifax Guilford
Whitingham
Vernon
Figure 3.8.3 -2 Maximum Considered Earthquake ground motion for Vermont of 0.2 sec. Spectral Response
Acceleration (Ss) (5 percent of critical damping), Site Class B (2006 International Building Code)
Section 3: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS 3-27
Site
Soil Profile Name
Class
A Hard Rock
B Rock
C Very Dense Soil and Soft Rock†
D Stiff Soil Profile†
E Soft Soil Profile
Liquefiable Soils
F Highly Sensitive Clays
Peats or Organic Clays
† For the simplified design procedure,
consider footings placed on a 10 feet or
thinner layer of soil over rock as placed on
rock. (ASCE 7-05 Section 12.14.8.1)
The maximum considered earthquake spectral response acceleration for short periods (SMS) and the maximum
considered earthquake spectral response acceleration for 1-second period (SM1) are determined as follows:
Table 3.8.3.3 -1 Values of Site Coefficients (Fa and Fv) as a Function of Site Class and Mapped Spectral Response
Acceleration at Short Periods (Ss) and at 1-Second Period (S1) Respectively.
Fa Fv
Mapped Spectral Response Mapped Spectral Response
Site Acceleration at Short Periods (Ss) Site Class Acceleration at 1-second Period (S1)
Class
Ss ≤ 0.25 Ss = 0.50 S1 ≤ 0.1
A 0.8 0.8 A 0.8
B 1 1 B 1
C 1.2 1.2 C 1.7
D 1.6 1.4 D 2.4
E 2.5 1.7 E 3.5
F † † F †
† Consult the 2006 International Building Code.
(2006 IBC 1613.5.3)
3-28 VTrans Structures Design Manual
The approximate fundamental period of the covered bridge (Ta) is less than 0.8TS.
The fundamental period of the covered bridge (T) is less than TS.
The fundamental period of the covered bridge (T) is greater than TO and less than TS.
Table 3.8.3.6 -1 Seismic Design Category Based on Table 3.8.3.6 -2 Seismic Design Category Based on 1-
Short-Period Response Accelerations Second Period Response Accelerations
Ta = 0.02(hn)^0.75 (3.8.3.6.2-1)
T = CuTa (3.8.3.6.2-2)
Section 3: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS 3-29
TO = 0.2TS (3.8.3.6.2-4)
To provide minimum structural integrity in the event of an earthquake, the structure should be designed to
resist a lateral force of 1% of the dead load of the covered bridge housing
The connection connecting smaller elements of the covered bridge to the rest of the structure should be
capable of resisting a horizontal force of 5% of the weight of the smaller element. When using the
simplified design procedure, the resistance of the connection shall be the greater of 0.2 times SDS or 0.05
both times the weight of the smaller element.
The supports of beam, girders or trusses shall be capable of resisting a horizontal force of 5% of the dead
load and anticipated live load carried by the covered bridge during an earthquake. Do not consider live load
if the covered bridge truss or housing is self supported or otherwise separate of the bridge deck.
3.8.5 Simplified Analysis Procedure for Seismic Design of Covered Bridges Meeting
Seismic Design Categories B and C
The designer should attempt to place covered bridges on locations satisfying site categories A through D. Covered
bridges should not be considered essential (See Section 3.8.3.5 ) and therefore will be assigned to use category I. If
the roadway is the only entrance into an area or VTrans considers the roadway vital in providing aid to an area, the
designer may consider the bridge may essential and therefore be assigned to use category II. The simplified analysis
procedure provided in this section is available for bridges assigned to use category I. Bridges in other use categories
require additional design considerations from the IBC.
For seismic design category B, apply seismic forces either laterally or longitudinally, separately. (ASCE 7-05
Section 12.14.6)
For seismic design category C, apply seismic forces in the most critical condition of 100% on one direction plus
30% of the perpendicular direction.
In either case, do not consider seismic loads applied at angles in between each of the orthogonal directions.
3-30 VTrans Structures Design Manual
where:
W = Effective seismic weight including dead weight of the entire covered bridge plus 20 percent of flat
roof snow load. The weight of the bridge deck need not be included in W.
Froof = V(wroof / W) for the roof acting at the top of the roof
F1 = V for the entire weight of the covered bridge acting at the base of the roof
Where wroof is the portion of the effective seismic weight (W), as defined above, for the roof level. (ASCE
7-05 Section 12.14.8.2)
The structure shall resist the shear force at the base of each level.
Where Wc is the tributary weight of the covered bridge at the point of support.
E = Eh + Ev (3.8.5.5 -1)
E = Eh - Ev (3.8.5.5 -2)
Section 3: LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS 3-31
Where:
Eh = QE (3.8.5.5 -3)
3.8.5.6 Overturning
The structure must resist overturning effects caused by seismic forces at each level in the covered bridge design.
Design covered bridges that meet the requirements for Seismic Design Category D according to the additional
requirements of the IBC.
= effective angle of internal friction = 34° (The Lab can provide more accurate values based on the
site conditions)
Use LRFD Table 3.11.5.3-1 to obtain the coefficients of friction between the backwall/footing and soil. Ignore
friction between the backwall and the backfill when using cohesionless backfill behind a vertical or near vertical
wall.
3-32 VTrans Structures Design Manual
For internal forces in buried concrete frame structures, a temperature rise of 35ºF and a temperature fall of 45ºF
should be considered in design.
3.12.1 Formwork
Design for temporary formwork, but allow for stay-in-place formwork. A redesign or a design check of the deck will
be required, if the Contractor decides to use stay-in-place formwork.
For conventional formwork (plywood, etc.) assume a uniform dead load of 0.010 k/ft². In addition to dead loads,
design concrete formwork with a construction live load of 0.050 k/ft².
Unit Weight
Load Description
(k/ft²)
Screed (LL) 0.450 k/ft†
Equipment (LL) 0.005 k/ft²
Temporary Forms 0.010 k/ft²
Temporary Railing 0.030 k/ft
† Spread out over 10 ft
4
Values obtain from various examples from State Transportation Agencies.
Section 4: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION 4-1
Satisfying force equilibrium and identifying a load path to transfer superstructure loads to the foundations is the
primary analysis goal for designers.
The remainder of this section contains guidance on a variety of topics. Topics include computer programs, load
distribution, load rating, substructure fixity and lastly, LRFD exceptions.
4.2 SOFTWARE
Engineering software (i.e. Conspan, Merlin Dash, etc.), MathCAD sheets and spreadsheets play a large role in the
design of bridges. Using Software does not remove the responsibility of the Structural Engineer to verify (through
hand calculations, other programs, past experience, etc) that results are accurate. VTrans maintains a list of these
resources at http://vtransengineering.vermont.gov/sections/structures/design_tools.
Consultants may use any software programs and/or spreadsheet for their internal design or analysis work. The
Structures Section does not have any requirements for such software. The Structures Section however, requires the
Consultant to provide an electronic copy of the final input files compatible with the primary design software
designated herein along with an electronic copy of the output from which they derived the design or their hand
design calculation checks. At the completion of the design phase, the Consultant shall submit the electronic files to
the Structures Section on physical electronic media such as a CD-R, Flash Drive or other electronic media
compatible with current standard desktop computer equipment. Consultants may also make these files available via
their internal ftp site or upload them to the Agencies ftp site. Included in this submittal shall be required material
including design calculations performed by hand or other software, details and plans.
In some cases, this may mean the Consultant will be required to produce input files for software required by the
Structures Section in addition to their internal software. The Consultant shall use software designated by the
Structures Section as a verification tool for the results of their internal design software.
Consultants must submit any RISA 3D model along with their design calculations. If the Consultant uses STAAD,
the STAAD model must be sent in as a substitute for a RISA 3D file, so long as the model can be translated to RISA
3D. The Consultant may contact RISA at http://www.risa.com for more information on STAAD compatibility.
4.3.1.3 Deck, Wearing Course, Future Wearing Surface, Railing, Barriers, and
Medians
For beam bridges, distribute the dead load of the deck to the beams based on their respective tributary widths.
Distribute superimposed dead loads, such as the wearing course, future wearing surface, railings, barriers, sidewalks
and medians equally to all beam lines.
For reinforced concrete slab bridges, distribute the weight of the barrier railing loads to the edge strip. For design of
the interior strip, distribute the weight of the barriers across the entire width of the slab and combined with other
superimposed dead loads.
Section 4: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION 4-3
For the interior and exterior beams, the designer shall use the controlling (or larger) distribution factor calculated for
one lane loaded, two lanes loaded or three or more lanes loaded for flexure. Do the same for shear for locations
within the span and at the supports. The controlling distribution factor will be the larger of these.
When checking deflection, the distribution factor shall be the maximum number of lanes loaded divided by the
number of beams and multiplied by the respective multiple-presence factor.
The designer shall also calculate the fatigue distribution factors similarly as above except only consider one lane
loaded.
Fix the downhill bearings for bridges on grades, except for a simple span bridge where one of the substructure units
is founded on bedrock. In this case, the fixed support will be located on the substructure unit founded on bedrock
4-4 VTrans Structures Design Manual
regardless of elevation. For longer bridges, consider the flexibility of each pier and its bearings to determine the
appropriate substructure units to fix.
If pier flexibility and geometry permit, use a minimum of two fixed piers per expansion joint unit. For very flexible
piers, such as pile bents or slender columns, the expansion bearings may be redundant (the pier may move before the
bearings begin to slide).
Often using a simplified method may help in arriving at a solution. For example, instead of setting up a continuous
beam model, design moments in pile bent pier caps can be determined in the following manner: Positive moment
requirements can be determined by assuming simple spans between the supporting piles. Compute the required
negative moment capacity assuming a propped cantilever for the outside spans and fixed/fixed boundary conditions
for the interior spans.
Designers should be aware that railroads often have specific criteria for design of structural components, carrying
their tracks or in the vicinity of their tracks. The criterion can vary between different railroad companies.
Section 5: CONCRETE STRUCTURES 5-1
When using multiple types of concrete or reinforcement in a project, the designer must clearly show the location of
each material on the plans.
5.1.1.1.1 HP Class AA
This class of concrete has a smaller maximum course aggregate size and may be used in cast-in-place thin deck
overlays where aggregate size may be an issue.
5.1.1.1.2 HP Class A
This class of concrete is primarily used when cast-in-place concrete is required in bridge superstructures.
5.1.1.1.3 HP Class B
This class of concrete is primarily used when cast-in-place concrete is required in bridge substructures.
1
These mix classes have an increase in cost and should only be used if a need exists.
5-2 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Design
Unit Maximum
Concrete Compressive
Location/Component Weight* Aggregate
Class Strength
(lbs/cf) Size (in)
(ksi)**
thin deck overlays where aggregate size may
HPC AA 150 4 1/2
be an issue
decks, railings, medians, sidewalks, curtain
walls, all concrete for integral abutment
HPC A 150 4 1
bridges above the bridge seat (including
wingwalls)
slab bridges, backwalls, abutment stems,
footings, pile caps, wingwalls, pier columns
HPC B 150 3.5 2
and caps, drilled shafts, all concrete below
the bridge seat of integral abutments
railings, custom pieces where it may be
difficult or unadvisable to provide vibration HPC SCC 150 3.5 N/A
to the concrete due to its shape or location.
This concrete may be used when it is desired
to reduce the weight of certain bridge HPC LW 95-120 4 1
components.
Fill from top of rock to bottom of footing for
C 150 3.0 2
spread footings (subfootings)
* Weight is of unreinforced concrete. The unit weight of concrete with reinforcement is
usually taken as .005 kips/cubic foot greater than the unit weight of plain concrete. For
concrete strengths greater than 5 ksi the following equation should be used:
145 + .001*f’c
Prestressed and precast concrete shall be used as design and construction dictates. The design strength of precast
concrete is 5 ksi per Standard Specification Section 540. The design strength for prestressed concrete must be
indicated on the plans. Currently, strengths up to 8 ksi are common for prestress members. The unit weight of
precast or prestressed members (lbs/cf) shall be calculated using the following equation 145 + .001*f’c. If aggregate
size is a concern because of tight reinforcement spacing or other constraints than the maximum aggregate size to be
used in the mix design for precast or prestressed members shall be indicated on the plans.
release strengths may be considered if required by design. A precast plant can typically “turn over” a form in 24
hours with lower release strengths. Taking advantage of this, will keep the costs of prestressed beams down.
These values may vary. Mixes with limestone and marble aggregates have lower values whereas mixes with cherts
and quartzite aggregates have higher values.
5.1.2 Reinforcing
5.1.2.1 Sizes of Reinforcing Steel
Use Grade 60, AASHTO M31 billet-steel bars for reinforcement in all reinforced concrete designs. Table 5.1.2.1 -1
lists the bar sizes. The modulus of elasticity for mild steel reinforcing (Es) is 29,000 ksi.
Level I (Limited Corrosion Resistance) – Plain, Low Alloy, and Epoxy Coated Reinforcing Steel
Level II (Improved Corrosion Resistance) – Stainless Clad and Dual-Coated Reinforcing Steel
The reinforcing steel type used in a component should match the existing steel used in that component for a
partial replacement or widening project.
Level I – Level I reinforcing steel shall be used in all locations not designated as requiring Level II or Level
III corrosion protection.
The following locations shall utilize reinforcing steel with Level II or Level III corrosion protection:
Tunnels or substructures in a tunnel-like environment likely to be exposed to salt water or salt spray
from plowing operations
Level III – Level III reinforcing steel shall be utilized in those locations listed above for any of the following
scenarios:
Interstate structures,
Site where extended service life is desirable due to the high cost and/or difficulty of bridge
maintenance or construction.
Level II – Level II reinforcing steel shall be utilized in those locations listed above where Level III
reinforcing steel is not warranted, i.e. non-NHS State and Town highway structures.
Level I (Epoxy Coated) – Epoxy coated reinforcing steel may be substituted for Level II or III reinforcing
steel in those locations listed above for either of the following scenarios:
Components having a reduced design life. For example, a deck replacement on existing beams or
substructure, where the intended design life is 30 years or less.
Coated reinforcing steel is difficult to effectively repair in the field and stainless steel is difficult to
cut in the field. Thus, the designer should try to limit the number of reinforcing bars detailed to be
cut-to-fit in the field.
Section 5: CONCRETE STRUCTURES 5-5
Use standard 7-wire low-relaxed 0.6 inch diameter2 prestressing strand with a cross section area = 0.217 in²
for longitudinal pre-tensioning and longitudinal post-tensioning strand for prestress beams and girders.
Coupler coating or lack of coating shall match the connecting reinforcing steel.
Satisfy the fatigue testing requirements of NCHRP Project 10-35 (12 ksi).
Welding lap slices is acceptable, but the rebar needs to meet the requirements of ASTM A706 and should
be designated on the plans as “ASTM A706 (WELDABLE)”. You should also indicate on the project
drawings, specifications, or general notes that "The welding of reinforcing bars shall conform to the
ANSI/AWS D1.4 Welding Code.”
2
For metric designs, it is appropriate to refer to 0.6” diameter strand as simply “0.6 strand” or “six-tenths strand.”
5-6 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Cover
Situation Example(s) (in.)
Cast against earth Footings 3.0
Coastal 3.0
Curbs, Sidewalks &
3.0
Exposure to deicing salts Walls exposed face
Deck surfaces subject to tire stud or chain wear Decks & Slab bridges
Paved deck 2.5
Bare deck 3.0
Exterior other than above Walls buried face 2.0
Interior other than above
Up to No. 11 bar 1.5
No. 14 and No. 18 bars 2.0
Bottom of cast-in-place slabs
Up to No. 11 bar Decks & Slab bridges 1.5
No. 14 and No. 18 bars 2.0
Precast soffit form panels 0.8
Piers – all components except footings 4.0
Precast reinforced piles
Noncorrosive environments 2.0
Corrosive environments 3.0
Precast prestressed piles 2.0
Cast-in-place piles
Noncorrosive environments 2.0
Corrosive environments
o General 3.0
o Protected 3.0
Shells 2.0
Auger-cast, tremie concrete, or slurry construction 3.0
3
The basis for this moratorium on the use of anchor systems utilizing adhesives is a technical advisory T 5140.26
issued by FHWA on October 17, 2007.
Section 5: CONCRETE STRUCTURES 5-7
5.2.1.2 Walls
5.2.1.3 Footings
5.2.1.3.1 Minimum Footing Thickness
Spread footing – 2 feet
Detail a horizontal construction joint at beam seat elevations. Include this joint in wingwalls. Note that the
contractor must take beam profiles and establish the finish grade before placing concrete above this joint. See Figure
5.2.3.1 -1 for the detail if the joint intersects the slope of the wing wall.
TOP OF WINGWALL
HORIZONTAL
6"
CONSTRUCTION
JOINT
90°
WINGWALL
Detail vertical expansion joints in long, continuous substructures and walls to keep the maximum length of each
piece to 90 feet.
Detail vertical contraction joints in substructures and walls at a maximum of 30 feet intervals measured along the
face of the abutment and wing walls.
5.2.3 Continuity
When designing integral abutment structures or multiple spans with concrete beams or girders, the designer should
design each span of the superstructure as a simple span, and then place the overlay as if the bridge were continuous.
Occasions arise where the designer must use continuity. If this is true, use the live load condition and super dead
load condition as load cases for continuity. To calculate reasonable live load moments in the negative moment
region, the designer must make a careful assessment of how to model the continuous structure. The structure has no
dead load point of contraflexure.
The negative moment region and the overlay are cast-in-place concrete. Use the AASHTO Section 5 to design the
overlay and to check flexural cracking in the overlay.
There exists research that recommends the use of positive moment reinforcement over a pier. The NCHRP Report
322 covers this topic in detail.
4
Policy as stated in Structures Engineering Instructions 09-003 (04/20/09). The standard details that have been used
prior to LRFD implementation for CIP slab bridges and approach slabs have not included a top mat of reinforcement
to control cracking due to the effects of shrinkage and temperature. To date the performance of the slab bridges and
approach slabs constructed with out the top mat of reinforcing steel have been satisfactory. In addition, the
proximity of a reinforcing steel mat near the top of the deck may cause long term durability problems due to
corrosion due to chloride intrusion.
Section 5: CONCRETE STRUCTURES 5-9
Figure 5.2.7.2 -2 Wing wall corner detail for more than 45° angle
5-10 VTrans Structures Design Manual
5.3.1 Skews
Form the ends of the voided slab or box beam units on skews up to 45°.
Voided slabs or box beam units formed with skewed ends greater than 30° will have the acute corner
clipped. The designer should determine the clip size. Accepting different clip sizes that the fabricator has
shown on shop drawings is acceptable. The clip is to minimize breakage of the corner upon strand release.
For expansion ends of box beam decks, specify that the contractor shall fill the clipped void with foam
filler prior to the overlay placement. Otherwise, specify using the overlay concrete to fill the void. See
Figure 5.3.1 -1.
Make sure the shop plans show recessed and grouted strands at the ends of the prestress units. This insures
the beams will have fully enclosed strands.
Skew the voids in box beams at the same angle as the beam-ends. Step the voids in voided slabs in order to
maintain the minimum clearance from the transverse strands.
PRESTRESSED UNIT
END OF PRESTRESSED UNIT
Beam, nor another non voided structure will work for your site the consideration of Butted Box Beams is acceptable
provided it follows the guidance below.
Site Classification III – The interstate and other National Highway System routes are not permitted to have voided
structures where inspection of the voids is not possible.
Butted beam decks are a good solution for rapid bridge construction; however, the additional labor and time required
for placing an overlay both counters this advantage as well as increases the cost of the project. Consider using an
overlay for any of the following reasons on a Site Classification I structure:
The design requires the additional strength provided by a composite section using a structural overlay.
Overlays have proven to lock in camber. If the deck profile requires a specific camber, use an overlay to
provide more camber control.
For thinner deck sections such as the 18 inch or thinner voided slab, or solid concrete slabs, an overlay may
facilitate the installation of bridge rail.
LRFD Section 5.14.4.3.2 requires a minimum shear key depth of 7 inches. For beam depth less than 15 inches
replace the 4” dimension in the table with the values in Table 5.3.4 -1.
TOOLED EDGE 3/
8" RADIUS Table 5.3.4 -1 Shear Key Top and Bottom Dimensions
1½” MIN
4“
"8
3/
5” FOR 8” SLAB
3/
8"
7” MIN
¾"
1½” MIN
¾"
4“
¾" CHAMFER
¼"
TO NOMINAL WIDTH
5-12 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Beam Dimension
Depth (in) (in)
10 1½”
Figure 5.3.4 -1 Full depth shear key detail for voided 12 2½”
slabs or box beams at least 15 inch in depth. 14 3½”
According to AASHTO LRFD Section 5.14.4.3.3d, shear keys shall have an average lateral compressive stress of
0.250 ksi. For deep beams, this could require numerous post-tensioning strands to accomplish this feat. Discussions
among PCINE members concluded that AASHTO intends this line of code to apply to solid deck slabs or top
flanges of segmental units. Voided slabs and box beams tend to direct all compressive forces along the diaphragms,
making the deck behave more like a beam-diaphragm grid system.
The number of diaphragms required shall be determined based on a 15’ maximum diaphragm spacing with no fewer
than 4 diaphragms per span. To determine the post tensioning requirements please see 5.3.6.1 Strands per Sleeve.
5.3.5 Grout
Follow VTrans Specification 510.13 for placing grout in shear keys for butted beams. Use a prepackaged grout
product that provides high bond strength for grouting of the shear keys. The preferable procedure for mixing grout
is by field manual mixing using the grout manufacturer’s recommendations. In all situations, require the Contractor
to place the grout manually.
POLYPROPYLENE
SHEATH
BEAM DEPTH
½” POST-
TENSIONING
TENDON
3” I.D.
EQ.
P.T.
SLEEVE
SEAL W/
OAKUM OR
EQUAL
½”
BEAM NOMINAL DIMENTION LINE
/2 "
71
Working Point
A A
41
/2 "
Void
4 1/2 "
Ex
12"
1/4 "
um
Void
7 1/2 "
B
7"
½" Diam Polystrand tendon tensioned to 30 kips
1/4 "
1" I.D. Transverse Plastic Pipe, Flexible (Polyethylene) Min 1" Cover
through Deck
Double Use Chuck
3" Diam. Hole through P/S Beam Made from 3" I.D.
PVC pipe (Sleeve to remain in Voided Slab) Pocket Recess to be filled w/
Non-Shrink Mortar of same
Texture & Color as Beam
Plate 1/2 " x 4 1/2 " x 4 1/2 " w/ 2" Diam Hole Perp. to
SECTION B-B AT STRAND
the longitudinal axis of the strand in all planes.
Figure 5.3.6.1 -2 Transverse Post-Tensioning Pocket *AASHTO M270 Grade 50 steel (M270/M270M, Grade 345 Steel)
5-14 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Transverse tendons shall be covered by seamless polypropylene sheath [with corrosion inhibiter grease
between sheath and strand] for the length of strand, except at anchorage locations, ties shall be tensioned to
either 33 kips for each 0.5 inch diameter strands and 47 kips for each 0.6 inch diameter strand.
Post-tensioning of the transverse tendons will follow the construction guidelines detailed in Section 5.6.2 in
this manual.
Specify beam type. Use only nominal beam widths when specifying the beam width (W) and calculating
total width (Total W). Make every attempt to use the widest section available and be consistent. For deck-
beams, use 48 inch wide sections. If the bridge geometry is tight, using a single 36 inch (915 mm) section
is acceptable. Another option is to bring in the outer fascias of the exterior beams, equally by the required
dimension. The precaster can cast the latter in the same bed with some modifications as the other beams,
thus keeping the cost down.
The price of a precast unit depends on the time and labor to ready the bed, assemble the reinforcing and run
the strands; time spent in the casting bed curing; time to detension and move out to the yard. These costs
are relatively static and are not dependent on the section width. Concrete and reinforcing steel costs are
relatively minor. The per foot cost of casting a 36-inch section can be nearly the same as casting a 48-inch
section. This results with a 36-inch section carrying a higher per square foot cost than a 48-inch section.
The cost of the bridge will be lower with fewer wider deck beam sections, even if the width of the bridge
increases slightly. Framing plan shall be drawn full length without breaks, and to scale, on the construction
plans. Show all internal voids and transverse ties.
5
El-Remaily, Ahmed, et al, 1996, “Transverse Design of Adjacent Precast Prestressed Concrete Box Girder
Bridges”, PCI Journal, July-August 1996, pp 96-113
Section 5: CONCRETE STRUCTURES 5-15
If torsional load in fascia beams (due to sidewalk overhang or utilities), is excessive, increase the number of
strands and/or post-tensioning tendons and adjust transverse tie locations as required.
The designer shall verify that no conflict exists with the prestressing strands the transverse tendons, the
anchor bolts, and the rail anchoring system.
CL
#4 BARS
SEE SECTION B-B TRANSVERSE
TENDON
#4 BARS @ XX
A A
2½" DIAMETER
B
CONDUIT CL
STIRRUPS AS REQUIRED
9" BY DESIGNER
7" 18"
(TYP)
2" CLEAR
(TYP)
2" CLEAR
(TYP) 12"
B
(3) #4 BARS
AS SHOWN
1½” CLEAR
(TYP)
#4 BARS AT XX
The first row of the strands has been set at 2¾” from the bottom of the unit. The designer should not
deviate from this distance.
Designers will continue to have the option of designing debonded strands or adding reinforcing steel in the
top portion of the units.
Stirrups will be Level II or Level III reinforcing depending on the level of corrosion resistance required for
the superstructure.
Make sure anchor bolts, steel plates and nuts are included as part of item 510.21 “Prestressed Concrete Box Beams”.
Specify all Anchor Bolts and Nuts as AASHTO M164M and require them to be zinc coated. Specify all washers
shall be AASHTO M270M Grade 345 and require them to be galvanized using AASHTO M111M.
PRESTRESSED VOIDED
SLAB OR BOX BEAM
4"
2½" SLEEVE
MORTER TYPE IV
(FIXED END)
COLD POURED JOINT SEALER
(EXPANSION END)
BRIDGE SEAT
DRILL AND GROUT
EACH ANCHOR DOWEL
24"
ABUTMENT
CL
BRG
5.4.2 Waterstop
Use the waterstop to seal the horizontal joints or gaps often found in bridge end details. Separate concrete
placements create such joints. Setting prestressed concrete beams on bearings creates a gap between the beam and
the bridge seat. The waterstop as shown in Figure 5.4.2 -1 have longitudinal tabs that embed into concrete when
placed. When using with prestressed concrete beams, clip off the tabs that would otherwise be set against the beam
so the waterstop can be fully adhered to the beam end.
Include P.V.C. waterstop as part of the payment for the unit bid price for the adjacent cast in place concrete. The
engineer may allow alternative waterstop configurations.
CLIP TABS
JOINT
13/16”
CL
HOOKED BAR
BEARING
CONCRETE DECK
Avoid splicing epoxy coated and conventional black reinforcing steel if possible. If necessary, splice the
bars outside of the concrete requiring epoxy coated rebar.
Table 5.5.3 -2 Basic Development and Splice Lengths Table 5.5.3 -3 Basic Development and Splice Lengths
for Class B Concrete (Tension) (f’c = 3.5 ksi) for Class B Concrete (Compression) (f’c = 3.5 ksi)
fc = 3.5 ksi
fy = 60 ksi
Calculate Splice lengths for f’c = 4.0 ksi concrete. These lengths are slightly less than lengths for f’c = 3.5
ksi concrete.
Calculate Splice Lengths for Top Horizontal reinforcement above more than 12” of fresh cast concrete.
The modification factor is 1.4.
For top steel of footings with at least 12 inches (300 mm) of concrete cast below:
Cd = 1.4
For epoxy-coated bars with cover less than 3db or with clear spacing between bars less than 6db:
Ce = 1.5
Ce = 1.2
CdCe ≤ 1.7
If the spacing (s) is 6 inches or more, the designer may choose to apply a factor of 0.8 to the development
length.
5.5.5.1 Category 1
A splice category that excludes a physical splice, however, alternate bars terminate as shown in Figure 5.5.5 -1.
5.5.5.2 Category 2
A splice category 2 is where the bar-splice is at the top of footing, See Figure 5.5.5 -2.
1. Where both bars are the same, the splice length shall be 1.7ldb or greater. Where bar “A” is larger than bar
“B”, use the criteria for the category 3 splice.
"d"
3
(THEORETICAL CUT OFF POINT
MOMENT CAPACITY OF BAR "A"
OF BAR "B")
1 2
"
"s
"
"s
BAR "B"
BAR "A"
1
BAR "B"
BAR "A"
5.5.5.3 Category 3
A splice category 3 is where the bar-splice and bar size change occurs at the moment capacity of the smaller bar, See
Figure 5.5.5 -3.
2. Splice length shall be at least 1.3ldb of bar “B” (for Class B splice - Table 5.5.3 -1) or shall be at least 1.7
ldb of bar “B” (for Class C splice - Table 5.5.3 -1)
Where:
d = Effective depth
Refer to the Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete ACI 318R-05 (ACI 318RM- 05) Commentary for
another source of information.
Section 5: CONCRETE STRUCTURES 5-23
OF BAR "A")
BAR "B"
1
2
"
"s
BAR "A"
5.6 CONSTRUCTION
5.6.1 Deck Concrete Placement Sequence
5.6.1.1 Simple Spans
For single span decks, place concrete in one placement, beginning at the low end and proceeding to the high end.
5.6.2 Sequence of Construction for Prestressed Voided Slabs and Box Beams
The following is a suggested sequence of construction and is included to inform the designer of how these units go
together. This sequence, or parts of it, may be included in the plans to assist the contractor and resident engineer.
Locate and drill one 3 inch diameter hole at each anchor bolt location.
Install bearings.
Prior to erecting the beams, power-wash the fascias with water to remove dust and other debris.
As work progresses, install hardwood wedges between adjacent beams to maintain proper joint opening
with a minimum of one wedge at each lateral tie.
Verify that hardwood wedges are in place as required to prevent slippage of beams.
Using calibrated jack, post-tension tendons to approximately 5 kips to remove sag in the tie and to seat the
chuck.
For stage construction, protect the second stage ducts at the joints, with the second stage strand in place, or
Styrofoam over the duct opening.
Additional joint preparation and grout placement shall be per manufacturer’s recommendations.
Using a calibrated jack operated by qualified personnel, post-tension tendons to 33 kips for each 0.5”
diameter strands or 47 kips for each 0.6” diameter strand. Begin with the tendons at each end and then
work symmetrically towards the midspan from each end. This will provide the maximum compressive
force between deck beams.
Place the cold poured joint sealer in the sleeves in the prestressed units at the expansion ends. Place the
washer plate and install the nut on top. Hand-tighten and then loosen ½ turn.
Grout over the nut and bolt in the anchor bolt block outs on the fixed ends. Fill the anchor bolt block outs
on the expansion ends with cold poured joint sealer.
For End Detail that use backwalls, place the back wall first and then place an overlay.
Figure 5.7.1 -2 North East Bulb Tee (NEBT) Type A Bridge End Detail
Section 5: CONCRETE STRUCTURES 5-27
Figure 5.7.1 -3 North East Extreme Tee (NEXT) Type A Bridge End Detail
Figure 5.7.2 -2 North East Bulb Tee (NEBT) Type B Bridge End Detail
Figure 5.7.2 -3 North East Extreme Tee (NEXT) Type B Bridge End Detail
Section 5: CONCRETE STRUCTURES 5-29
BEGIN/END BRIDGE
APPROACH SLAB
12"
18"
6"
1:
6" X 1/2 " EXPANSION 1 CL
MATERIAL (TYP) BRG.
ABUTMENT
PROVIDE BOND BREAKER
BEGIN/END BRIDGE
CONCRETE OVERLAY
CL
BRG.
ABUTMENT
Figure 5.7.4 -2 Voided Slab and Box Beam Type D Bridge End Detail
Section 5: CONCRETE STRUCTURES 5-31
Figure 5.7.5 -1 North East Bulb Tee (NEBT) Type E Bridge End Detail
Figure 5.7.6 -1 North East Bulb Tee (NEBT) Type F Bridge End Detail
5-32 VTrans Structures Design Manual
APPROACH SLAB
150 X 13 EXPANSION
MATERIAL
PROVIDE BOND BREAKER BOX BEAM
PVC WATERSTOP
300
CONSTRUCTION JOINT
MIN.
460
1:
1
CL
BRG.
ABUTMENT
APPROACH SLAB
6" X 1/2 " EXPANSION
MATERIAL
1:
1
CL
BRG.
ABUTMENT
SUBBASE
PVC WATERSTOP
BOX BEAM
1/2 " EXPANSION 3" MIN.
MATERIAL @ 60° F
12"
CONSTRUCTION
JOINT
MIN.
18"
1:
1
CL
BRG.
ABUTMENT
Refer to AASHTO Section 6.15 for the design of steel foundation piles.
Refer to joint document G12.1 “Guidelines for Constructibility” from AASHTO and National Steel Bridge Alliance
(NSBA) for recommendations (from a group of design engineers and fabricators) on topics such as flange sizing,
cross frames, stiffeners, bolts, splices and etc. AASHTO/NSBA G1.4 “Guidelines for Design Details” is also a
valuable reference. These documents and other AISC and AASHTO/NSBA collaboration standards can be found at
http://www.aisc.org/contentNSBA.aspx?id=20130.
6.2 MATERIALS
6.2.1 Structural Steel
In most cases AASHTO M270 (Grade 50) steel is used for design of steel components. High Performance Steel
may be used where warranted. (See Section 6.2.1.2 ) The following material properties are also used in the design
of steel components.
While designing a plate girder with weathering steel, determine the actual thickness of material that the design needs
and then add 1/16 inch. After adding this thickness, round plate thickness to an acceptable thickness as
recommended in Table 6.3.2.4 -1. Avoid rounding the plate thickness more than once in the design process.
6.2.2 Bolts
AASHTO M253 (ASTM A490) bolts should not be used, unless preapproved by the State Bridge Engineer. They
are less ductile and more sensitive to the number of threads in the grip than AASHTO M164 (ASTM A325) bolts.
After reaching maximum tension, they tend to “unload” (lose tension) more rapidly than the AASHTO M164
(ASTM A325) bolts.
Type 1 bolts should be used with non-weathering steel and shall be galvanized.
See Section 14.4.3 for the requirements of anchor bolts for bearing devices.
Anchor bolts for bridge railing shall meet the requirements of Subsection 714.07.
Welding of structural tube shall conform to the requirements of the AWS D1.1/D1.1M: Structural Welding Code –
Steel.
6.2.5 Paint
6.2.5.1 Standard Paint Colors1
For Brown use Color Chip Number 20059.
1
Federal Standard 595c, January 16, 2008 http://www.everyspec.com/FED-STD/download.php?spec=FED-STD-
595C.005533.PDF
Section 6: STEEL STRUCTURES 6-3
1”
Note: No minimum residual camber is necessary for sag vertical curves. In the case where haunch depths would be
excessive for a cambered or straight beam, negative camber may be appropriate. Large haunches can also be
accommodated by taller shear studs or “piggy-backing” studs.
For convenience, some of the common shapes and their tolerances have been compiled in Table 6.3.1.2 -1.
Slope cross frames and diaphragms at abutments parallel to the cross slope for ease of forming the transverse
haunch.
For Rolled Beams and Plate Girders from 24 to 48 inches deep, use the Structural Detail Sheets for guidance on the
proper diaphragm size and details.
5/
16"
3"
3"
PIER DIAPHRAGM
MC18 X 42.7
3"
Even if not required by AASHTO, evaluate whether additional lateral bracing will be necessary to provide stability
under construction conditions; refer to Section 6.6.4 of this document.
6.3.5 Paint
6.3.5.1 Painted Joints
All steel components, including those constructed using weathering steel but excluding those constructed of stainless
steel, adjacent to a bridge joint shall be coated. The coating may be a galvanized coating or an approved paint
system overtopped with grease. All steel components, including cross frames and connection plates, within a
distance, calculated as 1½ times the depth from finish grade to the bottom of the steel, from the joint shall be coated.
A steel component is considered to be adjacent to a bridge joint and requires a coating if a failure of the joint system
to convey water off the bridge would result in the steel component becoming wet.
“The existing structural steel on this project was painted with a material which may contain lead. The removed
structural steel is the property of the Contractor. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold the state, its officers and
employees harmless concerning the Contractor’s use or disposition of the structural steel.”
Shear connectors should penetrate at least 2 in into the concrete deck or completely through the bottom mat of deck
reinforcement. Use longer shear studs when haunch depths prevent this.
In the negative moment region, shear studs shall be no further than 2 feet, even if the reinforcing steel is not being
counted in the girder-line section.
Design shear connectors for the controlling fatigue limit state, then check the design with the controlling strength
limit state.
6.3.8 Stiffeners
6.3.8.1 Transverse Intermediate Stiffeners
Design girder webs with sufficient thickness to eliminate the need for transverse intermediate stiffeners.
Perform a fatigue analysis on transverse welds on tension flanges even if the flange is not fracture critical.
6-8 VTrans Structures Design Manual
CL
MEMBER
CONNECTION PLATE
OR STIFFENER CONNECTION PLATE
5/16 "
(MIN) WELD, INDICATE REQUIRED
*
MINIMUM LENGTH AND SIZE
COPE
3"
CROSS FRAME
*
OR LATERAL BRACING
*
* *
*
1" MIN. 1" COPE
* NO WELD FOR ¼" (6 mm) MIN., ½“ (13 mm) MAX.
* NO WELD FOR ⅜" (10 mm) MIN. ⅞" (20 mm) MAX.
(EXCEPT MUST MAINTAIN 1" (25 mm)
MINIMUM FROM EDGE OF FLANGE)
Figure 6.4.3 -1 Weld termination and coping details for Figure 6.4.3 -2 Weld location detail at cross frames and
steel members lateral bracing
Figure 6.4.3 -3 Abutment bearing stiffeners for welded Figure 6.4.3 -4 Pier bearing stiffeners for welded plate
plate girders girders
Section 6: STEEL STRUCTURES 6-9
CL
WELDED PLATE
GIRDER
TIGHT FIT
5/
16"
(MIN.)
TIGHT FIT
Figure 6.4.3 -5 Intermediate connection plates and/or stiffeners for welded plate girders
Only Shielded Metal Arc Welding [SMAW] processes are acceptable without process and procedure qualification.
Refer to the manual “Economical and Fatigue Resistant Details, Participant Handbook” for welded connection
details.
6.4.4 Splices
6.4.4.1 Maximum Beam Shipping Length
In general, limit shipping lengths to a maximum length of 150 feet. Consider the route the supplier will likely take,
delivering the beams to the construction site when determining beam segment length. Route geometry through
communities may require limiting the maximum length to something shorter.
For simple spans or continuous spans where the total girder is less than the maximum shipping length, design the
girder for erection as a single segment.
Locate the splice for simple spans greater than the maximum shipping length, at one of the girder’s third points.
6-10 VTrans Structures Design Manual
For continuous spans where the total length exceeds the maximum shipping length, locate the splice at the point of
dead load contraflexure. If the distance to the point of dead load contraflexure is greater than the maximum shipping
length, locate the splice at the maximum shipping length. Consider the appropriateness of any splice location other
than the expected point of inflection.
The total design moment multiplied by the net moment of inertia of the web divided by the net moment of
inertia of the entire section;
The moment due to eccentricity of the shear force introduced by the splice connection
Investigate loads in splice plates based on gross and net section of the plates using appropriate capacities.
Investigate applied loads in splice plates, based on net section of the plate using appropriate capacities.
The average of the shear force capacity of the web plates on either side of the splice
The result should be greater than or equal to 75% of the shear force capacity of the section.
Design bolted splices in non-composite areas according to the following procedure. This procedure requires
modifications for the design of a splice in a composite region.
Determine maximum actual moments and shear values at the splice location (normally near the point of
inflection.)
Assume some bolt pattern in flange and web; determine design section properties for the splice based on
the net section of the weakest spliced member.
Base the section’s design moment on the average of the section’s moment capacity on either side of the splice, plus
the maximum moment occurring at the splice. This should not be less than 75% of moment capacity of the design
section.
The thickness of the thinner flange plate at a butt joint should be at least one-half of the thicker plate.
Vary the flange thickness instead of the width for the required flange area of steel. If a change in width is
necessary, use a shop welded butt splice.
In the interest of simplifying fabrication, extending the flange thickness to girder ends or field splice points,
in excess of design requirements, is acceptable if the cost is justifiable. The AISC Marketing has a formula
for justifying the costs.
Separate shop flange butt welds and shop web butt welds by at least a 2 feet offset.
New steel truss bridges shall be designed such that the connection between members, including gusset
plates, welds, pins, and/or bolts, shall meet applicable AASHTO requirements and have the required
structural capacity for all applicable load cases. The load cases shall include consideration of the loading of
the structure during all phases of construction.
o Design calculations shall be included in the project design folder or provided by the supplier if the
bridge is prefabricated. The original load rating shall include and document rating values for each
of the connections. The design and rating calculations for connections in a new structure shall be
AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) and Load and Resistance Factor Rating
(LRFR), respectively.
Rehabilitated truss bridges shall have the structural capacity for all connections between members,
including gusset plates, pins, rivets, bolts and/or welds, checked for all applicable load cases for the
rehabilitated condition. The load cases shall include consideration of the loading of the structure during all
phases of construction.
o After rehabilitation all connections shall meet applicable AASHTO requirements and have the
required structural capacity for all applicable load cases. Existing connections that do not have the
required structural capacity shall be replaced. The structural capacity check shall consider section
loss and the actual condition of the gusset plates, pins, rivets, bolts and/or welds. The load rating
for the rehabilitated bridge shall include and document rating values for each of the connections.
The design and rating calculations for connections shall be completed by the same code and
methodology as all other components of the rehabilitated structure.
Existing steel truss bridge load ratings shall be reviewed (to ensure that the capacities of gusset plate
connections were/are adequately considered) and shall be re-calculated as determined necessary, when:
o There is inspector concern (ex. an inspector observes a gusset plate to be smaller/thinner than
might be expected when compared to other gusset plates on the structure, gusset plate is showing
evidence of buckling, etc.), or
o Significant sectional area of a gusset plate connection has been lost due to deterioration or
significant structural damage has occurred, or
o The loading is significantly altered by removing or adding dead loads (ex. adding rigid overlay,
concrete barrier, etc.), or
o The loading is significantly altered by increasing the live loading on the structure (ex. increased
permit loading).
The load rating of the connections for existing structures shall include the gusset plates, pins, rivets, bolts
and/or welds. The rating shall include and document rating values for each of the connections. The rating
calculations for the connections shall be completed by the same code and methodology as all other
components of the structure.
Section 6: STEEL STRUCTURES 6-13
Gusset plates in compression shall be designed according to AASHTO LRFD Articles 6.9.2.1 and 6.9.4 for the
LRFD method and AASHTO Article 10.54.1.1 for the LFR method.
Shear yield
Shear fracture
The resistance of the fasteners must also be calculated, with the overall gusset connection resistance to be taken as
the smaller of the fastener resistance and the gusset plate resistance.
Design gusset plate connections according to the LRFR standards followed in Part A or the LFR standards followed
in Part B of the FHWA Gusset Plate Evaluation Guidance2.
2
http://bridges.transportation.org/Documents/FHWA-IF-09-
014LoadRatingGuidanceandExamplesforGussetsFebruary2009rev3.pdf
6-14 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Structural redundancy
Internal redundancy
With load path redundancy, a member transfers loads to adjacent members or through alternate paths with the failure
of any single member. The best example of load path redundancy is a bridge with four or more longitudinal main
girders. A typical example of structural redundancy is the interior spans in a continuous span bridge. Indeterminate
trusses can also be structurally redundant. Internal redundancy occurs when a girder is composed of a number of
components such as angles and plates that are connected by rivets or bolts (not welded). Consider the first load path
redundancy in design.
Secondary members are structural elements that do not carry primary stress or act as primary load paths.
Examples of fracture-critical members or components are tension flanges and webs of two or three girder systems;
tension flanges; the tension chords and diagonals of trusses; and floor beams in trusses or thru girders that are spaced
more than 12 ft. apart on center. Some columns are fracture critical as defined by the designing engineer.
Examples of non-fracture critical members are all components of the girders in any bridge with four or more girders,
the compression chord of a truss and the stringers in a floor system of a thru girder or truss. The designer need not
consider two or three girder pedestrian bridges and pedestrian truss bridges fracture critical because they are not
subject to high numbers of load cycles.
Section 6: STEEL STRUCTURES 6-15
Avoid designing bridges containing fracture critical members whenever possible. However, in many situations, an
adequate alternative to their use may not be available. Vertical clearance restrictions may necessitate the use of thru
truss or thru girder structures. In addition, very long spans may be cost prohibitive when attempting to provide a
load path redundant structure. Bridges that have fracture critical members have restricted allowable fatigue stress
ranges and more stringent fabrication requirements. The VTrans Standard Specifications for Construction address
these issues.
Designers shall designate tension zones of all fracture-critical members on the contract plans.
When the Designer has determined that the column or column system is fracture critical, they shall designate all
column components as fracture critical on new steel bents where columns experience tension under LRFD Strength
III loading.
When the Designer has determined that the column or column system is fracture critical, they shall designate all
column-strengthening components as fracture critical on major rehabilitations where a significant portion of the
work is associated with the seismic strengthening and/or retrofitting of the structure.
System Redundant Members must also be designated on the design plans. System Redundant Members are members
that need not be considered as Fracture Critical Members, but must still be designated on the plans.
For further information on Fracture Critical Members, see FHWA’s Clarification on the Classification of Fracture
Critical Members.
“Only those members or plates identified with the notation “CVN” must meet the Charpy V-Notch requirements for
main members. See Section 714 of the Vermont Standard Specifications for Construction.”
6-16 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Determine an acceptable range of cantilever end loadings considering the uncertainty of support conditions
at various loading conditions.
Proportion steel girder sections to resist load effects of the design range of cantilever end loadings.
Allow expansion at cantilever ends, with closed cell foam behind curtain walls.
Determine theoretical girder elevations at cantilever ends and splice points at time of girder erection.
6.6.4 Construction
Stability of structural steel during transportation and erection is the Contractor’s responsibility. However, designers
must ensure that the erection of the structural steel will not require extraordinary means of support. The designer
must check the local buckling stress of the compression flange due to steel dead load during erection procedures.
The designer will determine the location of field splices (see Section 6.4.4), determine segment lengths and analyze
each segment. The stability of the spliced girder is the responsibility of the Contractor. If the calculated design ratio
(capacity divided by the applied load) against local compression buckling is less than 1.1, the designer shall increase
the area of the compression flange or specify other means of temporary bracing.
Section 7: ALUMINUM STRUCTURES 7-1
For new timber bridges, use live load criteria shall be as for other bridges.
8.2 MATERIALS
8.2.1 Base Resistance and Modulus of Elasticity
Determine the Base Resistance and Modulus of Elasticity for the proposed wooden material. Allow for the
following:
Use of treated timber in covered bridge rehabilitation shall be at the discretion of the designer.
The designer may use runner planks for one-way bridges. Evaluate each project for the most appropriate treatment.
For material not covered in this section, refer to the AASHTO LRFD Section 9.
9.2.2 Curbs
Use curbs on the deck for the following:
If a curb is not required because of the above, detailing a curb on the bridge cross section is optional.
Curb heights not otherwise designated shall be detailed as 7 inches above finish grade.
9.2.3.1 Scuppers
Generally, the designer does not need to use scuppers on structures less than 300 feet in length. These structures
should have a full shoulder width that provides sufficient cross-sectional area to carry the design storm runoff. When
the structure requires scuppers, place them where they will not discharge onto a roadway underneath or onto the
substructures. Flat grades require more scuppers.
On bridges where scuppers are required, consider placing a scupper on the “upstream” side of any joint.
9.2.3.2 Downspouts
In general, galvanized steel downspouts should be used where bridge drainage is required. Fiberglass Reinforced
Polymer (FRP) downspouts may be preferable in locations that are difficult to reach for maintenance. However,
FRP downspouts should not be used where they may be impacted or are not protected from impact. Downspouts are
commonly impacted by ice or debris on wet crossings from below and from winter maintenance activities moving
ice and debris from above.
Section 10: FOUNDATIONS 10-1
Likewise, the check flood is usually the scenario wrought by the 500 year rain event. However, other more frequent
rain events may have a more adverse impact on the design of a structure, and those more frequent events should be
used as the check flood.
Abutments which have been protected by keying in Stone Fill, Type III or Type IV into the toe of the stream without
obstructing the river in front of the abutment may be evaluated at the Service limit state without considering the
effects of scour due to the design flood.
Structures must also remain standing for the Extreme Event I and remaining Extreme Event II limit states without
consideration for the effects of scour.
The minimum thickness of any compacted layer underneath a footing shall be 1 foot.
Use frost depths from the Flexible Pavement Design Procedure to set dry footings.
10.2.3.2.1 Abutments
Abutments founded on spread footings on soil without piles shall be designed with the bottom of footing below the
scour elevation for the check flood and the design flood, whichever is lower.
Cantilever abutments founded on piles shall be designed for acceptable joint movement at the service limit state at
the design flood scour depth with the backfill forces still acting on the abutment. If stone fill type III or type IV is
able to be keyed in without obstructing the river in front of the abutment, the abutment may be designed for
acceptable joint movement at the service limit state with no scour. Piles and structure shall be structurally sound at
the strength limit state for the design flood and the check flood when fully scoured out.
Integral abutments shall be structurally sound at the strength limit state for the design flood and the check flood
when fully scoured out.
10.2.3.2.2 Piers
Piers founded on spread footings on soil without piles are not recommended. In general, piers should be founded on
deep foundations or spread footings on bedrock.
Piers founded on piles shall be designed for acceptable joint movement at the service limit state at the design flood
scour depth. Piles shall be structurally sound at the strength limit state for the design flood and the check flood in the
fully scoured condition.
Using #8 Rebar dowels at 4’-0” centers may be necessary on smooth or sloping bedrock to provide shear
resistance.
Step footings where the bedrock elevation varies significantly along the footing. Steps should be kept to a
minimum, have a vertical face, and extend for the full width of the footing. Each step shall be a minimum
of 2 feet or the thickness of the footing, whichever is greater. The lower footing shall support the upper
footing at the step.
Steel H-Pile:
Horizontal design of the piles shall be done at the Service Limit State.
Pile Batter [horizontal component of the axial load]. Pile batter should not exceed 1:4.
Lateral deflection of the substructure shall be limited to meet the requirements of the joints and bearings
chosen. See Section 14.1 for Joint and Bearing limitations.
Limit the permissible passive resistance accepted by a pile to those values recommended by the Materials
and Research Section
For pile groups, refer to LRFD Table 10.7.2.4-1 for using P-multipliers.
Minimum pile spacing shall be 2’-6” or 2.5 pile diameters. Piles shall extend a minimum of 1’-0”
vertically into the footing.
Piles shall have a minimum side encasement of 9” from face of footing to face of pile.
Lateral deflection of the substructures shall be limited to meet the requirements of the joints and bearings chosen.
See Section 14.1 for Joint and Bearing limitations.
Section 11: ABUTMENTS, PIERS AND WALLS 11-1
Spread footing substructures may be design using either the strip method or a total unit design procedure.
Type of soil
Weight of superstructure
Bearing resistance
When using a previous design on a project, use available software resources, to check the design against the
requirements of that project in an efficient manner.
Be mindful however, that tweaking an existing design and its details may loose its economy as more complexities
crop up. Try to anticipate such complexities prior to following this path.
The designer need not bury footings on bedrock. Have the Geotechnical Engineer review bedrock competency.
For spread footings on soil the reaction shall be within the middle ½ of the base & on rock is shall be
within the middle ¾ of the base (See LRFD 11.6.3.3)
2'-0" 2
(MIN) 1 4'-0"
MIN
DITCH PILES
(MIN)
5'-0"
FROST
SUSCEPTABLE
PILES
2
ORIGINAL GROUND 1
4'-0"
10'-0"
(MIN)
DITCH MIN
LEDGE PILES
1
Refer also to the policy stated in Structures Engineering Instructions 09-001, from October 30th, 2009, at
http://vtransengineering.vermont.gov/sites/aot_program_development/files/documents/structures/SEI-09-001.pdf.
Section 11: ABUTMENTS, PIERS AND WALLS 11-3
Design the toe reinforcement to resist the moment caused by the upward soil pressure on the footing toe.
Check toe shear at a “d” distance from the front face of the stem.
Generally, the stem rebar extended into the toe is more than adequate for the toe design requirement.
Insure that the details clearly show an adequate amount of reinforcing and the reinforcing schedule includes that
steel.
There are a variety of factors to be considered and the geometry in each case makes it necessary to give special
consideration to this part of the substructure design.
It is especially important to detail this area on the project plans in such a way that the resident engineer will know
what is intended and will not have to make judgments in the field relative to the reinforcing for this part of the
abutment.
Design the heel reinforcement to resist the moment caused by the downward pressures exerted on the heel.
Check heel shear at the back face of the stem. The upward soil pressures may be included in the shear design.
Use the method of analysis according to AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications to obtain
maximum transverse and longitudinal moments plus axial loads at each section under investigation.
Minimum reinforcement for piers shall be 1% of gross area of design section required, minimum or as
specified in LRFD (5.7.4.2).
For axial loads, generate moment interaction diagrams about the X and Y axes of the trial section.
Apply moments and axial loads determined in Step 1 to interaction diagrams generated in Step 3.
Repeat Steps 2 and 3 as required until moment and axial load values plot within the valid design region at
Step 4.
Solid shaft piers not designed as columns are subjected to biaxial bending and axial loads. Moments rather
than axial loads usually control the design; therefore, the piers are not compression members, as such.
Considering this, flexure in the section becomes the basis of the design.
Section 12: BURIED STRUCTURES 12-1
For rigid frames or arches, consider using weep holes or under drain.
Wing walls for box culverts, rigid frames or arches shall use weep holes.Design Introduction
12.2.2 Coatings
Use galvanized, aluminized or polymeric coating on all steel culverts.
Design Methodology. Use LRFD for all Buried Structures and Tunnel Liners.
12.3.2 Loading
For vertical pressure from dead load of earth fill (EV), use AASHTO “Rolled Gravel” 140 kcf.
12.3.4 Scour
Place 6” of select material in the invert unless otherwise required by the ANR. This material simulates a native
streambed. Baffles may be necessary to retain it.
Backfill undercut areas with Granular Backfill for Structures or Sand Borrow.
12-2 VTrans Structures Design Manual
Add Settlement of the fill at the center of the pipe to the minimum camber.
12.5.5 Headwalls
For all pipes 6 feet and over in diameter, use half height gravity headwalls at the inlet and outlet.
Extend Granular Backfill for Structures to but not into bottom of subbase.
TL-1 – Test Level One – taken to be generally acceptable for work zones with low posted speeds and very
low volume, low speed local streets;
TL-2 – Test Level Two – taken to be generally acceptable for work zones and most local and collector
roads with favorable site conditions as well as where a small number of heavy vehicles is expected and
posted speeds are reduced;
TL-3 – Test Level Three – taken to be generally acceptable for a wide range of high speed arterial
highways with very low mixtures of heavy vehicles and with favorable site conditions;
TL-4 – Test Level Four – taken to be generally acceptable for the majority of applications on high speed
highways, freeways, expressways, and Interstate highways with a mixture of trucks and heavy vehicles;
TL-5 – Test Level Five – taken to be generally acceptable for the same applications as TL-4 and where
large trucks make up a significant portion of the average daily traffic or when unfavorable site conditions
justify a higher level of rail resistance; and
TL-6 – Test Level Six – taken to be generally acceptable for applications where tanker type trucks or
similar high center of gravity vehicles are anticipated, particularly along with unfavorable site conditions.
The purpose of this document is to provide a detailed methodology for determining the minimum required test level
for a site’s bridge rail.
13.2.1 Definitions
ADTdy Average daily traffic for design year (total for both directions)
Ks Adjustment factor for deck height and type of land use below deck
ADTadj = ADTdy * Kc * Kg * Ks
Calculate ADTadj.
Use Table 13.2.1.1 -1 to determine appropriate Test Level. If the value is less than the value in the TL-4
column, then a TL-2 rail is required, with the following exceptions:
1
When a curve begins or ends within the approach rail section of the bridge then adjust these factors for that curve
even when the actual structure itself may be on a tangent.
2
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications C13.7.1.1
Section 13: RAILINGS GENERAL DESIGN 13-3
Figure 13.4 -3 Traffic Adjustment Factor (Ks) for Deck Height and Under Conditions
Section 13: RAILINGS GENERAL DESIGN 13-5
The influence of dynamic load allowance shall be included for all joints and bearings.
The joints and bearings should allow movement due to temperature changes, creep and shrinkage, elastic shortening
due to prestressing, traffic loading, construction tolerances, camber release, substructure deflections and other
effects.
Document the costs of accepting a potential bearing or joint failure at the site. A risk assessment should
include consideration of ADT, operational classification, detour length, economical impacts and any other
relevant factors. Verify that a bearing or joint failure will not damage other structural components at the
service limit state.
14.2 JOINTS
14.2.1 Joint Types
14.2.1.1 Modular Expansion Joint
These joint systems are proprietary products used for allowing large movements exceeding 4 inches longitudinally
and accommodating some transverse movement. The intent of these systems is to seal the joint throughout the
expansion and contraction extremes, while maintaining a smooth driving surface. Consider using this joint when
skews and/or lateral movement exceed the capacity of the Vermont Joint using fingerplates.
1 ¼"
PAVEMENT SURFACES TO BE
3/8 "
TOP COURSE
SANDBLASTED ON BOTH SIDES
OF PAVEMENT
OF JOINT
6"
Figure 14.2.1.4 -1 Saw Cut Joint Detail Figure 14.2.1.4 -2 Saw Cut Joint Detail Close Up
The Joint is to be located accurately by string lining, or other means, prior to paving, so that the saw cuts will be
made directly over the end of concrete deck. Cut the joint dry in a single pass and seal within a 24 hours period or
prior to exposing to traffic. Clean the joint prior to applying the joint sealer. Refer to specification 524 and the
special provisions.
Section 14: JOINTS AND BEARINGS 14-3
14.3 BEARINGS
14.3.1 Requirements for Bearings
14.3.1.1 Horizontal Force and Movement
14.3.1.1.1 Coefficients of Friction
Materials Coefficient
Steel on Steel 0.15
Steel on Self-Lubricating Bronze 0.10
PTFE on Stainless Steel 0.06
†See Table 3.11-1 and LRFD Table
14.7.2.5-1 for more coefficients of friction
values.
CURTAIN
WALL
A
BACK OF CURTAIN WALL
FRONT FACE
OF ABUT.
CL
½“(TYP)
BEARING
BLOCK OUT
CL MEMBER
B B
¼" PLATE
(TYP)
SOLE PLATE
3"
(TYP)
3"
½"
BLOCK
MIN OUT
A
CURTAIN
CL WALL
½"
½"
½" 3" (TYP) ¼ " PLATE
7"
(TYP)
SOLE PLATE
6½"
EXP. BRIDGE BRIDGE SEAT
MAT. SEAT
FRONT FACE
½ " EXP.
OF ABUT.
VIEW A - A MATL.
CL
3" BEARING
MIN
SECTION B - B
Figure 14.3.1.1.2 -2 Elevation Detail along Curtain Wall Figure 14.3.1.1.2 -3 Elevation Detail along Beam for
for Bearing Box Out Curtain Wall Bearing Box Out
BEARING
CL
NOMINAL BEAM
WIDTH (TYP)
CL OF NOMINAL WIDTH
(TYP)
A
A
14.4.1.2 Holes
Holes in the base plates and sole plates shall be a minimum of ⅜" larger in diameter than the nominal diameter of
the anchor bolt.
The minimum sole plate thickness for plates attached to elastomeric bearings is 1½". The minimum sole plate
thickness for all other bearings is 1”.
For Fixed End Anchor Bolts, hand tighten the nut, and burr the threads above the nut.
For Expansion End Anchor Bolts, leave a ⅛" gap below the nut, and burr the threads above the nut.
The minimum length of the sole plate is the bearing length plus the total travel plus 3".
The maximum design rotation equals the construction tolerance of +/- 0.010 radians, plus the rotation due to live
load deflection.
Expansion bearings of the pot type shall have a stainless steel surface attached to the sole plate and a Teflon surface
attached to the top of the piston.
Some Bearing configurations will require a placement table with relation to the temperature the structure will be set.
Load rate new structures with their full dimensions given in the plans.
Various computer programs used in Structures can assist with load rating most types of superstructures.
Some structure types, such as slant leg steel rigid frames, must be load rated manually with the use of live load
influence lines.
New or rehabilitated bridges or buried structures designed using the AASHTO Standard Specifications and the LFD
methodology shall be load rated using AASHTO Load Factor Rating (LFR). Rehabilitated historic metal and/or
timber trusses and historic arches bridges designed using the AASHTO Standard Specifications and the ASD
methodology shall be load rated using AASHTO Allowable Stress Rating (ASR).
Rate existing bridges and buried structures on the NHS using either the AASHTO LFR or LRFD as determined by
the Bridge Management and Inspection Engineer. Rate existing and historic timber bridges and historic arches on
the NHS using the AASHTO Allowable Stress Rating (ASR).
Rated existing bridges and buried structures not located on the NHS using AASHTO LFR, ASR or LRFD as
determined by the Bridge Management and Inspection Engineer. However, rate existing and historic metal and/or
timber bridges and historic arches using the AASHTO Allowable Stress Rating (ASR).
1
Policy as stated in Structures Engineering Instructions 08-005 (7/9/08)
15-2 VTrans Structures Design Manual
36 TONS
3S2
(41’)
11' 4' 22' 4'
4K 8K 8K 8K 8K
22.4'
66 TONS
6 Axle Trailer
(54.67’)
11' 4.67' 31' 4' 4'
6K 12K 12K 12K 12K 12K
32.5'
30 TONS
3 Axle Straight
(19’)
15' 4'
6K 12K 12K
13.6'
34.5 TONS
4 Axle Straight
(23’)
15' 4' 4'
6K 9.5K9.5K9.5K
15.7'
38 TONS
5 Axle Semi
(35’)
11' 4' 16' 4'
4K 8.5K8.5K 8.5K8.5K
15.7'
20 TONS
H20
(14’)
14'
4K 16K
11.2'
36 TONS
HL93
(24’)
14' 14'
4K 16K 16K
18.7'
Follow the 2004 VTrans “Structures Division Manual” 4th Edition. See Chapter 24 “Load Rating”.
Section Number:
Name:
Affiliation:
Formatting problem
Wording is confusing
Text inaccurate
Wrong Units
Inaccurate Information
Inaccurate reference
Equation wrong
Other:
APPENDIX B: NOTES
B-2