@clinical Ethics Toolbox

Systematic Approaches to Ethics Cases / Moral Reasoning
Isabel Legarda MD
DEONTOLOGY (from Greek “deon” meaning duty)
What it is: an approach to ethical analysis that focuses on duties and obligations and requires
that patients be treated as ends in themselves / that no patient ever be treated as a means
to an end; often considered rule-based, with rules that must be universally applicable (e.g. do
not steal, do not kill, be true to your word).
Questions to ask when applying this approach:

• What are our obligations as clinicians to patients? To family members?
• What ethical decision would result in the patient being treated as most people would
wish to be treated in this particular case?
Well-suited for: patient-centered care; end-of-life issues; cases involving patient autonomy
Further reading:
pp. 12-15 of Heubel F and Biller-Adorno N (2005). The contribution of Kantian moral theory
to contemporary medical ethics: a critical analysis. Med Health Care Philos 8(1):5-18.
CONSEQUENTIALISM / UTILITARIANISM
What it is: an approach to ethical analysis that considers the greatest benefit that can be
achieved for the greatest number of stakeholders

• What action or decision benefits the greatest number of people?
• What is the desired big-picture outcome?
• What would happen if nothing were done?
Well-suited for: public health crises; disaster medicine; vaccine policies; challenges with
rationing and resource allocation
Further reading:
Beauchamp TL and Childress JF (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford UP,
354-361.
VIRTUE ETHICS
What it is: the use of character traits, and common judgments about the actions of
exemplars considered to have “good” character, to inform ethical decision-making

• What would a “good doctor” do in this situation?
• What clinical/ethical decision would result in the expression of key virtues in medical
practice: respect for others, compassion, kindness, honesty, diligence?
Well-suited for: a variety of clinical situations, but can be limited by vagueness, lack of
consensus about the ideals to apply, and lack of clarity or specificity about the best action to
take
Further reading:
Oakley, J (2012). A virtue ethics approach. In Kuhse H and Singer P (eds.), A Companion to
Bioethics (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 91-104.
Pellegrino, E.D. 2002. Professionalism, Profession and the Virtues of the Good Physician. The
Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York 69(6):378–84.
PRINCIPLISM
What it is: a top-down approach to ethical analysis – the one most commonly taught in
clinical medicine – in which respect for patient autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and
justice must be prioritized in clinical and ethical decision-making

• What are the patient’s values and wishes, and does the clinical decision align with
them?
• What will benefit the patient most?
• What will cause the least harm to the patient?
• What is the fairest outcome for those upon whom the final decision has an impact?
• In what ways will this decision have an impact on the overall system?
Well-suited for: a wide variety of clinical situations, but may be shown to have limitations
when honoring one principle conflicts with another
Further reading:
Taylor, RM (2013). Ethical principles and concepts in medicine. Handb Clin Neurol 118:1-9.
NARRATIVE ETHICS
What it is: a ground-up approach to ethical analysis that attempts to arrive at an ethical
decision or resolution by considering the complex underlying stories that have formed the
stakeholders’ views, values, and responses to a given situation

• Who are the stakeholders in the dilemma?
• What does each person strongly desire? Why?
• What is each person most afraid of? Why?
• What things matter most to each person?
Well-suited for: complex situations involving multiple involved stakeholders; critical care
situations in which parties are in conflict; difficult care situations in which loved ones feel
overwhelmed, underinformed, or lost about the “right” decision
Further reading:
https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/altc/content/the-power-stories-narrative-
ethics-long-term-care
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/ethical-force-stories-narrative-ethics-and-
beyond/2014-08
https://www.thehastingscenter.org/publications-resources/special-reports-2/narrative-
ethics-the-role-of-stories-in-bioethics/
FEMINIST ETHICS
What it is: an approach to ethical analysis that centers the needs and concerns of women,
recognizes the ways in which their interests are repeatedly and systematically neglected or
devalued, and strives to resist and rectify ways in which systemic injustices or disadvantages
have seeped into their individual experience

• How have societal or medical systems caused women particular inequities here?
• What does this woman need most?
• What would enable her to heal and flourish?
Well-suited for: ethical situations involving reproductive autonomy; cases in which women
may be disempowered by family dynamics, culturally derived priorities, legal constraints, or
inadequate resources; trauma
Further reading: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/

CARE ETHICS
What it is: an approach to ethical analysis that focuses on interpersonal relationships and the
expression of benevolence through action as the basis of moral decision-making

• On whom does the patient depend most? For what?
• Who depends on the patient? For what?
• What are the patient’s greatest vulnerabilities?
• What would best safeguard the interests of individuals involved?
• What is the most compassionate action in this case?
Well-suited for: elder care; maternal care; pediatrics; trauma
Further reading:
Tronto, JC (2005). An ethic of care. In Cudd, AE and Andreasen, RO (eds.). Feminist theory: a
philosophical anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 251-263.
Pellegrino, E.D. 2002. Toward a reconstruction of medical morality. The Journal of Medical
Humanities and Bioethics 8(1):7-18.
CASUISTRY
What it is: a ground-up approach to ethical analysis – the one we apply every session in this
course – in which examination of concrete cases allows for moral reasoning “by analogy”

• What comparable situations have occurred before?
• How were previous cases similar? How different?
• What were the clinical and ethical outcomes of past cases?
• What aspects of the current cases favor or argue against going in a particular
direction?
Well-suited for: a wide variety of clinical situations, but may be shown to have limitations in
pluralistic settings or be insufficiently conclusive or critical
Further reading:
Arras, JD (2012). A case approach. In Kuhse H and Singer P (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics
(2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 117-125.

@clinical Ethics Toolbox

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

@clinical Ethics Toolbox

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

@clinical Ethics Toolbox

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Systematic Approaches to Ethics Cases / Moral Reasoning

DEONTOLOGY (from Greek “deon” meaning duty)

Questions to ask when applying this approach:

Questions to ask when applying this approach:

Questions to ask when applying this approach:

Questions to ask when applying this approach:

Questions to ask when applying this approach:

Questions to ask when applying this approach:

Further reading: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/

Questions to ask when applying this approach:

Well-suited for: elder care; maternal care; pediatrics; trauma

Questions to ask when applying this approach:

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.