Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/13
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/13
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/13
SOCIOLOGY 9699/13
Paper 1 Socialisation, Identity and Methods of Research October/November 2023
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2023 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly
convey the same meaning (unless the mark scheme requires a specific term)
b DO credit alternative answers/examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they
are correct
c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one
prompt/numbered/scaffolded space where extended writing is required rather than list-type
answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g. State two reasons …).
d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is required.
(Check for evidence it is understood and not used wrongly.)
e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self-contradicting or trying to cover all
possibilities
f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already
credited unless the language itself is being tested. This applies equally to ‘mirror
statements’ (i.e. polluted/not polluted).
g DO NOT require spellings to be correct, unless this is part of the test. However spellings of
syllabus terms must allow for clear and unambiguous separation from other syllabus terms
with which they may be confused (e.g. Corrasion/Corrosion)
3 Calculation questions:
• The mark scheme will show the steps in the most likely correct method(s), the mark for
each step, the correct answer(s) and the mark for each answer
• If working/explanation is considered essential for full credit, this will be indicated in the
question paper and in the mark scheme. In all other instances, the correct answer to a
calculation should be given full credit, even if no supporting working is shown.
• Where the candidate uses a valid method which is not covered by the mark scheme,
award equivalent marks for reaching equivalent stages.
• Where an answer makes use of a candidate’s own incorrect figure from previous working,
the ‘own figure rule’ applies: full marks will be given if a correct and complete method is
used. Further guidance will be included in the mark scheme where necessary and any
exceptions to this general principle will be noted.
4 Annotation:
• For point marking, ticks can be used to indicate correct answers and crosses can be used
to indicate wrong answers. There is no direct relationship between ticks and marks. Ticks
have no defined meaning for levels of response marking.
• For levels of response marking, the level awarded should be annotated on the script.
• Other annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the
meaning will be understood by all examiners who marked that paper.
Some of the questions are marked using a point-based system, awarding marks for specific points
and accumulating a total mark by adding points.
Some of the questions are marked using levels of response mark schemes. For these, the level
descriptor represents performance at the top of the level. For levels of response marking you
should:
• award a mark at the top of the level if all criteria in the level are met
• consider the level descriptors across the full range, bearing in mind that it is not necessary for a
candidate to give a faultless performance for maximum marks to be awarded within any single
category.
• award marks on a ‘best-fit’ basis; thus, compensation between higher and lower achievement for
different criteria is acceptable.
In some cases, candidates may make some responses which the mark scheme has not predicted.
These answers should nevertheless be credited according to their quality.
Annotation Meaning
Benefit of the doubt given / the point is just about worthy of
credit
E1
Explanation of the point
E2
Explanation of why it is a strength/ limitation
Evaluation point
Developed point
Juxtaposition of point
Repetition
Incorrect response
Irrelevant material
On page comment
Identification of a point
Indicative content
(2 2 marks)
Indicative content
1 mark for making a point / giving a reason (e.g. can be completed without the
researcher present)
1 mark for explaining that point (e.g. because they are filled in by the
respondent themselves)
1 mark for selecting relevant sociological material (e.g. there is less likely to
be researcher bias)
1 mark for explaining how the material supports the point (e.g. so if a different
researcher completed the study they are likely to get similar results)
(2 4 marks)
Indicative content
Strengths
• low personal involvement.
• Research carried out in a ‘natural environment’ – high in ecological
validity.
• Ethical reasons: safeguards the consent of those being observed.
• Avert the possibility of ‘going native’.
• Easier to avoid being drawn into any illegal / unethical behaviour of the
group.
• Practical reasons: easier for researcher to make notes while observing.
• Allows researcher the opportunity to ask questions.
• Makes withdrawal from the group straightforward.
Strengths need to specifically relate to the overt aspect and not participant
observation in general.
(2 3 marks)
Indicative content
• The role played by the formal and informal (hidden) curriculum in the
transmission of class-based norms, values and roles.
• Use of cultural and / or social capital (Bourdieu) within schools (ways of
acting, attitudes and lifestyle) and social capital (networks of influence).
• Failure / success at school can shape a person’s perception of their social
class identity.
• Private education, especially public schools followed by Oxbridge –
contributes to membership of elite occupational groups in society
(judiciary, military, politics) and sense of leadership and
self-confidence.
• Exclusive social networks – peer groups formed in schools / university
(‘old boys’ network’) that provide self-help contacts in later life.
• Any other reasonable point.
Levels of response
Level 0: 0 marks
• No response worthy of credit.
Indicative content
Levels of response
Level 0: 0 marks
• No response worthy of credit.
4 Evaluate the view that the extent to which ethnic identities are changing 26
has been exaggerated.
Indicative content:
In support Against the view
Points • Emergence of hybrid • Ethnic identity is becoming
identities (mix of two or harder to identify i.e. the
more identities.) has traditional markers of
been overstated – ethnicity (traditions,
cultural differences language, diet, dress,
between groups remain religion etc.) that give
and, in many cases, may cultural groups a sense of
be hardening.(Jacobson) identity are breaking
• Rejection of the idea that down.
identity is simply a matter • Globalisation, diaspora,
of personal choice: it is assimilation and inter-
as likely to be a ethnic relationships as
response to racism / factors driving change.
’fitting in’ / playing down • New / hybrid forms
their own ethnicity and emerging – the option to
culture to gain adopt multiple identities
acceptance rather than depending on the social
as a preferred option. context e.g. ‘Brasian’,
• Examples of ethnicity ‘white mask’, code
being asserted as a switching etc. (Johal,
statement of difference Butler, Hall)
e.g. Mirza on female • Music, clothing, language
British Muslims wearing and diet as cultural
the hijab to distinguish elements that are subject
their identity and being to a ‘pick and mix’
generally more religious approach. White youth are
than their parents. Black also subject to this.
youth more inclined to • Concept of hybridity as a
use Patois as a way to counterpoint to the
actively assert their simplistic idea of ‘caught
ethnic identity in between two cultures’ –
opposition to others. fusion not confusion.
(Modood) • Potential links to
• Awareness of the role supporting theory e.g.
played by structure and postmodernism.
agency in relation to
identity.
Research Jacobson, Mirza, Modood Johal, Butler, Hall,
evidence postmodernism
Additional
concepts
The above content is indicative and other relevant approaches to the question
should be rewarded appropriately.
Levels of Response
The maximum mark for Question 4 is 26.
Examiners should award up to 8 marks for AO1, up to 8 marks for AO2, and up to 10 marks for AO3.
4 • Good knowledge and understanding of the view that the extent to which 7–8
ethnic identities are changing has been exaggerated.
• The response contains a range of detailed points with good use of
concepts and theory / research evidence.
3 • Reasonable knowledge and understanding of the view that the extent to 5–6
which ethnic identities are changing has been exaggerated.
• The response contains a narrow range of detailed points or a wider range
of underdeveloped points, with some use of concepts or theory or
research evidence.
2 • Basic knowledge and understanding of the view that the extent to which 3–4
ethnic identities are changing has been exaggerated.
• The response contains a narrow range of underdeveloped points and
may include basic references to concepts or theories or research
evidence.
1 • Limited knowledge and understanding of the view that the extent to which 1–2
ethnic identities are changing has been exaggerated.
• The response contains only assertive points or common sense
observations.
4 • The material selected will be accurately interpreted, well developed and 7–8
consistently applied to answering the question.
3 • The material selected will be accurate and relevant but lacks either some 5–6
development or clear application to the question.
2 • The material selected is relevant to the question but is not applied 3–4
accurately or has limited development.
1 • There is some attempt to apply sociological material but this lacks focus 1–2
on or relevance to the specific question.
5 • Very good analysis / evaluation of the view that the extent to which ethnic 9–10
identities are changing has been exaggerated.
• The evaluation is clear, explicit and sustained.
4 • Good analysis / evaluation of the view that the extent to which ethnic 7–8
identities are changing has been exaggerated.
• The evaluation is explicit and direct but not sustained or a more
descriptive account of evidence and arguments suggesting that the extent
to which ethnic identities are changing has not been exaggerated.
3 • Some analysis / evaluation of the view that the extent to which ethnic 5–6
identities are changing has been exaggerated.
• There is a juxtaposition of different arguments and theories which are not
clearly focused on the question or a few simple points suggesting that the
extent to which ethnic identities are changing has not been exaggerated.
2 • Basic analysis / evaluation of the view that the extent to which ethnic 3–4
identities are changing has been exaggerated.
• There is an attempt to consider more than one side of the debate or one
simple point suggesting that there is little evidence to support the
emergence of new hybrid ethnic identities.
1 • Limited analysis / evaluation of the view that the extent to which ethnic 1–2
identities are changing has been exaggerated.
• Any analysis or evaluation is incidental, confused or simply assertive.
5 Evaluate the view that the main influence on choice of research method 26
is the theoretical perspective of the sociologist.
Indicative content
In support Against the view
The above content is indicative and other relevant approaches to the question
should be rewarded appropriately.
Levels of Response
The maximum mark for Question 5 is 26.
Examiners should award up to 8 marks for AO1, up to 8 marks for AO2, and up to 10 marks for AO3.
4 • Good knowledge and understanding of the view that the main influence 7–8
on choice of research method is the theoretical perspective of the
sociologist.
• The response contains a range of detailed points with good use of
concepts and theory / research evidence.
3 • Reasonable knowledge and understanding of the view that the main 5–6
influence on choice of research method is the theoretical perspective of
the sociologist.
• The response contains a narrow range of detailed points or a wider range
of underdeveloped points, with some use of concepts or theory or
research evidence.
2 • Basic knowledge and understanding of the view that the main influence 3–4
on choice of research method is the theoretical perspective of the
sociologist.
• The response contains a narrow range of underdeveloped points and
may include basic references to concepts or theories or research
evidence.
1 • Limited knowledge and understanding of the view that the main influence 1–2
on choice of research method is the theoretical perspective of the
sociologist.
• The response contains only assertive points or common sense
observations.
4 • The material selected will be accurately interpreted, well developed and 7–8
consistently applied to answering the question.
3 • The material selected will be accurate and relevant but lacks either some 5–6
development or clear application to the question.
2 • The material selected is relevant to the question but is not applied 3–4
accurately or has limited development.
1 • There is some attempt to apply sociological material but this lacks focus 1–2
on or relevance to the specific question.
5 • Very good analysis / evaluation of the view that the main influence on 9–10
choice of research method is the theoretical perspective of the
sociologist.
• The evaluation is clear, explicit and sustained.
4 • Good analysis / evaluation of the view that the main influence on choice 7–8
of research method is the theoretical perspective of the sociologist.
• The evaluation is explicit and direct but not sustained or relies on a more
descriptive account of evidence and arguments suggesting that choice of
research method may be shaped by other factors such as practical or
ethical issues.
3 • Some analysis / evaluation of the view that the main influence on choice 5–6
of research method is the theoretical perspective of the sociologist.
• There is a juxtaposition of different arguments and theories which are not
clearly focused on the question or a few simple points suggesting that the
main influence on choice of research method is the theoretical
perspective of the sociologist.
2 • Basic analysis / evaluation of the view that the main influence on choice 3–4
of research method is the theoretical perspective of the sociologist.
• There is an attempt to consider more than one side of the debate or one
simple point, the choice of method may be shaped by other factors.
1 • Limited analysis / evaluation of the view that the main influence on choice 1–2
of research method is not the theoretical perspective of the sociologist.
• Any analysis or evaluation is incidental, confused or simply assertive.