Cambridge International AS & A Level: Business 9609/32
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Business 9609/32
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Business 9609/32
BUSINESS 9609/32
Paper 3 Case Study October/November 2023
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 100
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2023 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the
specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit is given for valid answers which go beyond
the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these features are specifically assessed by the
question as indicated by the mark scheme. The meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed instructions or in the application of generic level
descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question (however; the use of the full mark range may
be limited according to the quality of the candidate responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should not be awarded with grade thresholds or
grade descriptors in mind.
a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly convey the same meaning (unless the mark
scheme requires a specific term)
b DO credit alternative answers/examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they are correct
c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one prompt/numbered/scaffolded space where extended
writing is required rather than list-type answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g. State two reasons …).
d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is required. (Check for evidence it is understood and not used
wrongly.)
e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self-contradicting or trying to cover all possibilities
f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already credited unless the language itself is being tested.
This applies equally to ‘mirror statements’ (i.e. polluted/not polluted).
g DO NOT require spellings to be correct, unless this is part of the test. However spellings of syllabus terms must allow for clear and
unambiguous separation from other syllabus terms with which they may be confused (e.g. Corrasion/Corrosion)
4 Annotation:
• For point marking, ticks can be used to indicate correct answers and crosses can be used to indicate wrong answers. There is no direct
relationship between ticks and marks. Ticks have no defined meaning for levels of response marking.
• For levels of response marking, the level awarded should be annotated on the script.
• Other annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the meaning will be understood by all examiners
who marked that paper.
Marking of work should be positive, rewarding achievement where possible, but clearly differentiating across the whole range of marks, where
appropriate.
The examiner should look at the work and then make a judgement about which level statement is the best fit. In practice, work does not always
match one level statement precisely so a judgement may need to be made between two or more level statements.
Once a best-fit level statement has been identified, use the following guidance to decide on a specific mark:
• If the candidate’s work convincingly meets the level statement, award the highest mark.
• If the candidate’s work adequately meets the level statement, award the most appropriate mark in the middle of the range.
• If the candidate’s work just meets the level statement, award the lowest mark.
• L1, L2 etc. must be clearly annotated on the response at the point where the level is achieved.
Assessment objectives
AO2 Application
Apply knowledge and understanding of business concepts, terms and theories to problems and issues in a variety of familiar and unfamiliar
business situations and contexts.
AO3 Analysis
Analyse business problems, issues and situations by:
• using appropriate methods and techniques to make sense of qualitative and quantitative business information
• searching for causes, impact and consequences
• distinguishing between factual evidence and opinion or value judgement
• drawing valid inferences and making valid generalisations.
AO4 Evaluation
Evaluate evidence in order to make reasoned judgements, present substantiated conclusions and, where appropriate, make recommendations for
action and implementation.
1 Refer to lines 69–70. Analyse how the two changes in the economic environment will impact CQ. 8
2 3–4 marks
Developed analysis
• Developed analysis that identifies connections
between causes, impacts and/or consequences of
two points.
• Developed analysis that identifies connections
between causes, impacts and/or consequences of
one point.
Note:
• If more than two impacts are referred to, reward the best two.
1 Indicative content
Responses may include:
AO2 Application
Max one for application for the first element and max one for application for the second element.
• Linking ER depreciation to imports of bamboo from the US or exports of shoes to the US.
• CQ objective is to increase sales to US.
• Linking taxation to demand for shoes and/or CQ’s premium prices.
• Linking inflation to wage demands of workers at factory in country P.
• Linking taxation to CQ’s proposed investment in sustainability.
AO3 Analysis
Limited analysis – candidate shows one link in the chain of analysis.
Developed analysis – candidate shows two or more links in the chain of analysis.
• Depreciation will make imports of bamboo from the US more expensive therefore increasing CQ costs and
increasing price or reducing gross profit margin.
• Depreciation will reduce price of CQ shoes to US importers and therefore result in an increase in sales volume (and
value) helping to meet CQ objective of growth.
1 • Inflation may result in an increase in wage demands from workers at the factory in country P increasing costs of CQ
and therefore reducing profit margins.
• An increase in income tax will reduce consumers’ disposable income leading to a decrease in demand for goods and
therefore a decrease in sales revenue resulting in a decrease in profits.
• Unique nature of CQ’s product may mean that changes in price and income may have only a limited impact on sales
and profit.
• Increase in corporation tax will reduce retained profit and could therefore result in delay in CQ’s plans such as the
investment in sustainability limiting future profit of the company.
2 Analyse how two qualities of leadership demonstrated by Frederico have contributed to CQ’s success. 8
2 3–4 marks
Developed analysis
• Developed analysis that identifies connections
between causes, impacts and/or consequences of
two points.
• Developed analysis that identifies connections
between causes, impacts and/or consequences of
one point.
Note:
• If more than two leadership qualities are referred to, reward the best two.
2 Indicative content
Responses may include:
AO2 Application
Max one for application for the first element and max one for application for the second element.
2 AO3 Analysis
Limited analysis – candidate shows one link in the chain of analysis.
Developed analysis – candidate shows two or more links in the chain of analysis.
• Frederico demonstrates self-belief, being willing to give up his executive role and mortgage his house to set up the
business. This has enabled the business to finance the investment in product development to bring Frederico’s idea to
market.
• Creativity and innovation have given the business a competitive edge by developing a product that is unique and
meets customer demands for a shoe that is lightweight and comfortable to wear in a hot climate. This increases sales.
• Frederico spotted a gap in the market which enables CQ to face less direct competition and gain control over price
to charge a premium price and make more profit.
• Frederico’s communication skills have encouraged the unions and workers to accept change which will result in job
losses. His vision for the business may inspire loyalty. This negotiation will help CQ solve its operational problems and
reduce costs resulting in a higher profit margin.
3(c) Evaluate whether introducing lean production techniques will be sufficient to achieve CQ’s operational objectives. 12
AO1 Knowledge
AO2 Application AO3 Analysis AO4 Evaluation
Level and understanding
2 marks 2 marks 6 marks
2 marks
3 5–6 marks
Developed evaluation in context
• A developed judgement/conclusion
is made in the business context.
• Developed evaluative comments
which balance some key arguments
in the business context.
AO2 Application
Limited application, applies knowledge to CQ once.
Developed application, + applies knowledge to CQ twice.
• Inventory turnover of 3.08 means that inventory is currently kept for 119 days on average. Objective is to increase
inventory turnover to 5 times.
• Need to hold bamboo material for production and finished shoes to meet fluctuations in demand.
• 5% of output is defective – in six months = 6000 units. Objective is to cut this by 50%.
• CQ has only just taken over the factory. Objective to increase production to full capacity within eight months and
reduce workforce size.
• The shoe manufacturer had been unprofitable when CQ took it over.
• Unions have agreed to changes in working practices.
• By reducing all forms of waste CQ will be more efficient, and this will reduce unit cost of production making CQ
more competitive.
• Lean production includes TQM and quality circles. Giving workers responsibility for quality may increase motivation
resulting in a reduction in defective output, improve quality and productivity, making CQ more competitive.
• Lean production includes JIT manufacturing. Aim to hold zero inventory which will increase inventory turnover
resulting in less inventory holding costs.
• Training of employees will be required thus increasing costs of CQ but this could increase motivation of employees
resulting in higher productivity.
• Lean production aims to use less of everything and therefore may enable production to be maintained whilst reducing
the size of the labour force and therefore reduce unit costs.
• Lean production by building relationship with suppliers could eliminate the supply chain failures thus reducing the
high levels of inventory previously needed.
• Use of JIT may result in CQ running out of inventory and therefore lead to a loss of sales.
AO4 Evaluation
Limited evaluation – limited supported judgement and/or a weak attempt at evaluative comment.
Developed evaluation – supported judgement and/or reasonable evaluative comment.
Developed evaluation in context – supported judgement in context and/or reasonable evaluative comment in
context.
3(c) • Significance of other factors that may also impact success of LP:
– Existing factory, workers may have an ingrained culture to overcome.
• Evaluation of alternative approaches to achieving objectives such as investment in capital equipment or increased
marketing expenditure to increase sales and inventory turnover.
• Supported overall judgement about introduction of LP.
4(a) Refer to lines 48–49 and Table 1.1. Calculate the net present value (NPV). 4
854 800
NPV = total discounted cash flows – capital cost (1 mark if no correct calculations)
At least one correct discounted cashflow identified for Years 1–5 (1)
Correct calculation of all discounted cash flows for years 1–5
and/or cumulative discounted cash flow of $854 800 for years 1–5 (2)
NPV = 0.8548 – 1 (3)
NPV = ($145 200) OR (145 200) (4)
If answer not shown as negative i.e. $145 200 (3)
Allow rounding of discounted cash flows. Cumulative discounted cash flows 855 000 (2) and NPV of (145 000) (4)
AO1 Knowledge
AO2 Application AO3 Analysis AO4 Evaluation
Level and understanding
2 marks 2 marks 6 marks
2 marks
3 5–6 marks
Developed evaluation in context
• A developed judgement/conclusion
is made in the business context.
• Developed evaluative comments
which balance some key arguments
in the business context.
• Understanding of sustainability – business operations that can be maintained in the long term, for example, by
protecting the environment and not damaging the quality of life for future generations.
• Understanding of investment appraisal techniques NPV, ARR and Payback.
• Other factors in the decision:
– Cost
– Availability of finance
– Impact on workers/consumers
– Preferences of owners
AO2 Application
Limited application, applies knowledge to CQ once.
Developed application, + applies knowledge to CQ twice.
• NPV is negative. Discounted cash flows do not cover the capital cost.
• Payback is 4 years 10.8 months.
• Link between investment and mission statement regarding carbon neutrality.
• Investment will support CQ’s desire to reduce carbon emissions.
• Gearing of CQ is high – 3 / 4.2 X 100 = 71.4%.
• Preference of Frederico as owner.
• $1m required.
• NPV is negative suggesting that the investment is not worth considering as will be loss making in real terms over a five-
year period.
• Investment would boost CQ’s environmental image which could result in higher sales which would increase market
share.
• Improved environmental image would support maintenance of premium prices resulting in higher profits.
• Investment would reduce CQ’s reliance on external supplier of energy reducing the volatility of energy costs and
therefore make planning easier.
• High gearing may make raising finance more difficult from banking sector. This is a significant cost and could
impact liquidity of CQ negatively placing a strain on its finances.
AO4 Evaluation
Limited evaluation – limited supported judgement and/or a weak attempt at evaluative comment.
Developed evaluation – supported judgement and/or reasonable evaluative comment.
Developed evaluation in context – supported judgement in context and/or reasonable evaluative comment in
context.
AO1 Knowledge
AO2 Application AO3 Analysis AO4 Evaluation
Level and understanding
2 marks 2 marks 6 marks
2 marks
3 5–6 marks
Developed evaluation in context
• A developed judgement/conclusion
is made in the business context.
• Developed evaluative comments
which balance some key arguments
in the business context.
5 Indicative content
Responses may include:
• New product development is the design, creation and marketing of new goods and services.
• Research and development is the scientific research and technical development of new products and processes.
• Benefits of new product development:
– Attract repeat purchase by offering a product that is new and better
– Meet customer needs more effectively
– Attract new customers
– Gain a competitive advantage over competition
– Product differentiation
– Control over pricing
– Refresh the brand
– Spreading risk
• Disadvantages of NPD:
– Cost of product development
– Need for market research
– Risk of failure
– Timescale
AO2 Application
Limited application, applies knowledge to CQ once.
Developed application, + applies knowledge to CQ twice.
5 AO3 Analysis
Limited analysis – candidate shows one link in the chain of analysis.
Developed analysis – candidate shows two or more links in the chain of analysis.
• Improvements in product will maintain consumer interest in CQ’s shoes and prevent the product becoming outdated.
This will result in higher sales and potentially increased profit.
• Celebrity endorsement attracted by the sustainability of the shoe helped build sales initially.
• New product development can be expensive and is not guaranteed to be successful and therefore may constrain
profits and result in solvency issues.
• Product development may contribute to CQ’s image of high-quality and therefore support premium prices and give
higher profit margins.
AO4 Evaluation
Limited evaluation – limited supported judgement and/or a weak attempt at evaluative comment.
Developed evaluation – supported judgement and/or reasonable evaluative comment.
Developed evaluation in context – supported judgement in context and/or reasonable evaluative comment in
context.
• Without product development CQ will lose its competitive edge in the market. Products need to be continually
improving to maintain consumer interest.
• Fashions may change quickly in this industry and so it is important to constantly update products to satisfy consumers.
• Product development was essential to initial success of CQ by producing a product that was different to that of the
competition.
• To challenge leading brands in the running shoe market may require significant product differentiation due to strength
of brand image of existing firms.
• Product development vs market development strategy for success.
• Significance of current economic climate to the decision:
– Higher taxation may constrain finance available.
– NPD could develop cheaper range to counteract the economic constraints faced (higher taxation and inflation).
• Other factors in success:
– Celebrity endorsement might be most important as marketing depended on social media initially. However, was
this a direct result of CQ’s successful product development?