Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/12 March 2021

Cambridge International AS & A Level
SOCIOLOGY 9699/12
Paper 1 Socialisation, Identity and Methods of Research March 2021
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the March 2021 series for most Cambridge
IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level components.
This document consists of 17 printed pages.
© UCLES 2021 [Turn over

9699/12 Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme March 2021
PUBLISHED
Generic Marking Principles
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 1:
Marks must be awarded in line with:
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
Marks must be awarded positively:
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
© UCLES 2021 Page 2 of 17

PUBLISHED
Social Science-Specific Marking Principles

(for point-based marking)
1 Components using point-based marking:

• Point marking is often used to reward knowledge, understanding and application of skills.
We give credit where the candidate’s answer shows relevant knowledge, understanding
and application of skills in answering the question. We do not give credit where the answer
shows confusion.
From this it follows that we:
a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly
convey the same meaning (unless the mark scheme requires a specific term)
b DO credit alternative answers/examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they
are correct
c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one
prompt/numbered/scaffolded space where extended writing is required rather than list-type
answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g. State two reasons …).
d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is required.
(Check for evidence it is understood and not used wrongly.)
e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self-contradicting or trying to cover all
possibilities
f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already
credited unless the language itself is being tested. This applies equally to ‘mirror
statements’ (i.e. polluted/not polluted).
g DO NOT require spellings to be correct, unless this is part of the test. However spellings of
syllabus terms must allow for clear and unambiguous separation from other syllabus terms
with which they may be confused (e.g. Corrasion/Corrosion)
2 Presentation of mark scheme:

• Slashes (/) or the word ‘or’ separate alternative ways of making the same point.
• Semi colons (;) bullet points (•) or figures in brackets (1) separate different points.
• Content in the answer column in brackets is for examiner information/context to clarify the
marking but is not required to earn the mark (except Accounting syllabuses where they
indicate negative numbers).
3 Calculation questions:
• The mark scheme will show the steps in the most likely correct method(s), the mark for
each step, the correct answer(s) and the mark for each answer
• If working/explanation is considered essential for full credit, this will be indicated in the
question paper and in the mark scheme. In all other instances, the correct answer to a
calculation should be given full credit, even if no supporting working is shown.
• Where the candidate uses a valid method which is not covered by the mark scheme,
award equivalent marks for reaching equivalent stages.
• Where an answer makes use of a candidate’s own incorrect figure from previous working,
the ‘own figure rule’ applies: full marks will be given if a correct and complete method is
used. Further guidance will be included in the mark scheme where necessary and any
exceptions to this general principle will be noted.

PUBLISHED
4 Annotation:
• For point marking, ticks can be used to indicate correct answers and crosses can be used
to indicate wrong answers. There is no direct relationship between ticks and marks. Ticks
have no defined meaning for levels of response marking.
• For levels of response marking, the level awarded should be annotated on the script.
• Other annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the
meaning will be understood by all examiners who marked that paper.

PUBLISHED
Using the mark scheme
Some of the questions are marked using a point-based system, awarding marks for specific points
and accumulating a total mark by adding points.
Some of the questions are marked holistically using levels of response mark schemes. When marking
holistically, the marks awarded for an answer are usually based on a judgement of the overall quality
of the response.
For holistic marking, inevitably, the mark scheme cannot cover all responses that candidates may
make for all of the questions. In some cases, candidates may make some responses which the mark
scheme has not predicted. These answers should nevertheless be credited according to their quality.
Question Annotation Meaning
1 Identification of a point
DEV Development / description of the point.
2a Point that has been credited
E1 Explanation of the point
M Material used to support the point
E2 Explanation of how the material supports the point
2b Strength / weakness that has been credited
E1 Explanation of why the method has that strength/weakness
E2 Explanation of why it is a strength/weakness
3a Point that has been credited
EXP Some explanation but underdeveloped rather than developed
DEV Developed point
GEN Point on the general topic area rather than specific question

PUBLISHED
Question Annotation Meaning
3b Point that has been credited
DEV Developed point
4/5 Point that has been credited
DEV Developed point
EVAL Evaluation point
Other SEEN This material receives no credit

annotations
BOD Benefit of the doubt given
Vertical wavy Irrelevant material

line

PUBLISHED
Question Answer Marks
1 Describe two characteristics of upper-class culture. 4
Indicative content
• Conspicuous consumption.
• Ascribed status.
• Appreciation of ‘high culture’– e.g. fine art, opera, classical music, etc.
• Private education, especially public schools followed by Oxbridge
• Exclusive social networks – peer groups that provide contacts in later
life formed in schools/university (‘old boys’ network’).
• Participation in certain leisure activities like hunting and shooting,
tennis, golf etc. As well as attendance at elite sporting events like
Wimbledon, Henley and (Royal) Ascot.
• Codes of etiquette and manners – ways of speaking and behaving that
confer superiority.
• Social closure – excluding other classes from entry into the upper class,
e.g. by promoting marriage between families.
• Ideological power – culture of the upper class defines a way of life that
others should follow.
• Any other appropriate point.
Reward a maximum of two characteristics. For each characteristic, up to 2

marks are available:
1 mark for identifying a characteristic of upper-class culture.

1 mark for describing the identified characteristic.
(2 × 2 marks)

PUBLISHED
2(a) Explain two characteristics of the interpretivist approach to 8

sociological research.
Indicative content
• Use of qualitative data/methods.

• Building a rapport/connection with subject of study.
• Studying the way of life of the study group by observing them in their
natural environment.
• Gaining verstehen / empathetic understanding / seeing through the
eyes of the subjects.
• Focus on gaining data that is high in validity.
• Focus on understanding the meanings behind behaviour.
• Subjective approach to research.
• Focus on agency over structure.
• Any other appropriate characteristic.
For this question, use of sociological material is likely to be demonstrated

through reference to methodological concepts or use of examples related to
specific research methods.
Reward a maximum of two reasons. Up to 4 marks are available for each

characteristic:
1 mark for making a point / giving a characteristic (e.g. use of qualitative

methods).
1 mark for explaining that point (e.g. interpretivists believe that qualitative
methods allow you to gain a better understanding of the people you are
studying).
1 mark for selecting relevant sociological material (e.g. participant

observation).
1 mark for explaining how the material supports the point (e.g. P.O allows
you to gain verstehen /experience a situation from the point of view of the
group being studied).
(2 × 4 marks)

PUBLISHED
2(b) Explain two strengths of closed-ended questionnaires as a research 6

method.
Indicative content
Strengths
• Ease of codifying / quantifying answers.
• Easy to analyse data.
• Easily replicated / high in reliability.
• Allows for easy comparisons to be made, patterns and trends to be
identified.
• Less bias / more objective / no interviewer effect.
• No need for highly trained interviewer.
• Can make use of large samples.
• Quick / cheap to administer.
• Any other appropriate strengths.
Reward a maximum of two strengths. For each strength, up to 3 marks are

available:
1 mark for identifying a strength of (e.g. ease of codifying answers).
1 mark for explaining why this method has this strength (e.g. because it
allows researchers to easily convert responses into quantifiable data).
1 mark for explaining why it is a strength (e.g. gaining information in this way
enables the collection of large amounts of data potentially increasing its
representativeness).
(2 × 3 marks)

PUBLISHED
3(a) ‘Education is the most important agent of socialisation in shaping 10

identity.’
Explain this view.
Indicative content
• The role of education as an agent of secondary socialisation with

suitable examples and/or references.
• The role played by the formal and informal (hidden) curriculum in the
transmission of norms, values and social roles.
• Evidence that education may reinforce particular identities (such as
gender, ethnicity, class and age) supported by reference to a range of
studies.
• Links to social control.
• Potential usage of theory to support points (e.g. functionalism, Marxism,
feminism).
• Any other appropriate point.
Levels of response
Level 3: 8–10 marks

• Good knowledge and understanding of the view that education is the
most important influence in shaping an individual’s identity. The
response contains two clear and developed points.
• Sociological materials such as concepts, theories and evidence, will be
used to support both points. The material selected is appropriate and
focused on the question with its relevance made clear.

• Some knowledge and understanding of the view that education is the
response contains one clear and developed point and one relevant but
underdeveloped point.
• Sociological material is used to support at least one point. The material
selected is appropriate but not clearly focused on the question or its
relevance is not made clear.

• Limited knowledge and understanding of the view that education is the
response contains one relevant but underdeveloped point and one (or
more) points related to the general topic rather than the specific
question.
• Any supporting material lacks focus on the specific question.
Level 0: 0 marks
• No response worthy of credit.

PUBLISHED
3(b) ‘Education is the most important agent of socialisation in shaping 6

identity.’
Using sociological material, give one argument against this view.
Indicative content
• The role of education in socialising children may be exaggerated.
Children are able to exercise agency in breaking rules and rebelling
against authority.
• Education is largely imposed on children without choice – identity may
be more influenced by agents of socialisation that people freely choose
based on personal preferences and self expression.
• The role of other agents of socialisation relative to the influence of
education e.g. peer group may be a more important influence as
children form subcultures within school; family may be more important
as parents largely choose the type of school that children attend.
• Any other appropriate argument.
Levels of response

• One clear and developed argument against the view that education is
the most important influence in shaping an individual’s identity.
• Sociological material, such as concepts, theories and evidence, is used
to support the argument. The material selected is appropriate and
focused on the question with its relevance made clear.

• One clear but underdeveloped argument against the view that
education is the most important influence in shaping an individual’s
identity.
• The material selected is appropriate but not clearly focused on the
question or its relevance to the argument is not made clear.

• One point disagreeing with the view that education is the most
important influence in shaping an individual’s identity, which is
undeveloped or lacking clarity.
• Any supporting material lacks focus on the specific question.
Level 0: 0 marks

PUBLISHED
4 Evaluate the view that gender identity is changing. 26
Indicative content
In support of the view Against the view
Points • Evidence of new gender • Evidence of

identities forming. traditional
• Evidence of changing gender identities
socialisation patterns. persisting.
• Changes to female and • Socialisation
male priorities, for largely still
example in relation to traditional.
work and family focus • Workplace
• Evidence of gender inequalities
fluidity challenging remain.
traditional notions • ‘New’ gender
identity. identities are
• Changing less common in
representations of some parts of
gender (media) the world.
• Gender identity
is not uniform
and can be
modified by age,
ethnicity and
class.
• Biological
approach
Research Sharpe, Connell, Wilkinson Oakley, Connell,

evidence Mort
Key concepts Assertive femininity; new Patriarchy,

man; metrosexual; determinism, social
‘laddettes’; gender fluidity, control,
genderquake. normative/passive
femininity,
hegemonic/marginali
sed masculinity
The above content is indicative and other relevant approaches to the

question should be rewarded appropriately.
References to sociological theories such as feminism, functionalism or

postmodernism may be present but are not necessary even for full marks.

PUBLISHED
4 Levels of response

• Very good knowledge and understanding of the view that gender identity
is changing. The response contains a wide range of detailed points with
very good use of concepts and theory/research evidence.
• The material selected will be accurately interpreted, well developed and
consistently applied to answering the question.
• Clear, explicit and sustained analysis/evaluation of the view that gender
identity is changing.

• Good knowledge and understanding of the view that gender identity is
changing. The response contains a range of detailed points with good
use of concepts and theory/research evidence.
• The material selected will be accurate and relevant but not always
• Good analysis/evaluation of the view that gender identity is changing.
The evaluation may be explicit and direct but not sustained or a more
descriptive account of evidence and arguments suggesting that gender
identity is not changing.

• Reasonable knowledge and understanding of the view that gender
identity is changing. The response contains a narrow range of detailed
points or a wider range of underdeveloped points, with some use of
concepts or theory or research evidence.
• The material selected will be largely appropriate but its relevance to the
question may be unclear or confused at times.
• Some analysis/evaluation of the view that gender identity is changing.
The evaluation may be a simple juxtaposition of different arguments and
theories which are not clearly focused on the question or a few simple
points suggesting that gender identity is not changing.

• Basic knowledge and understanding of the view that gender identity is
changing. The response contains a narrow range of underdeveloped
points and may include basic references to concepts or theories or
research evidence.
• The material selected is relevant to the topic but lacks focus on or
relevance to the specific question.
• Any analysis or evaluation is likely to be incidental, confused or simply
assertive.

PUBLISHED
4 Level 1: 1–5 marks

• Limited knowledge and understanding of the view that gender identity is
changing. The response contains only assertive points or common
sense observations.
• There is little or no application of sociological material.
• Little or no relevant analysis or evaluation.
Level 0: 0 marks

PUBLISHED
5 Evaluate the view that sociological research should be value free. 26
Indicative content
In support of the view Against the view
Points • Positivist argument: • Partisan sociologists

via the hypothetico- (e.g. Becker) or some
deductive method Marxists and feminists
objectivity can be believe that researchers
achieved; in choice of should be ‘committed’
method, execution of and open in their
research and sympathies.
interpretation of • It is impossible to fully
results separate values from
• It is important to resist research so researchers
the imposition of should be clear about
subjective elements their views.
like values that distort • These sociologists (e.g.
research. Gouldner) are critical of
• Popper’s view that those they regard as
value laden theories ‘pretending’ they are
will eventually be value free, scientific and
falsified, neutral e.g. Parsons,
• A realist or Merton – they confuse
postmodern position value-freedom and
objectivity.
• The interpretivist position
on the nature of
objectivity and how
values affect the
selection of topics and
execution of research
• Weber’s view that
sociologists cannot be
value free in selecting
topics, and that their
choice of topic (and
methods) will reflect this
but that they can be
objective in their
research
Research Positivism Becker, Gouldner, Goffman,

evidence and many Marxists and
feminists
Key Subjectivity value-free, value-neutral,

concepts objectivity, committed
sociology
The above content is indicative and other relevant approaches to the
question should be rewarded appropriately.

PUBLISHED
5 Levels of response

• Very good knowledge and understanding of the view that that
sociological research should be value free. The response contains a
wide range of detailed points with very good use of concepts and
theory/research evidence.
• The material selected will be accurately interpreted, well developed and
• Clear, explicit and sustained analysis/evaluation of the view that that
sociological research should be value free.

• Good knowledge and understanding of the view that the sociological
research should be value free. The response contains a range of
detailed points with good use of concepts and theory/research evidence.
• The material selected will be accurate and relevant but not always
• Good analysis/evaluation of the view that sociological research should
be value free. The evaluation may be explicit and direct but not
sustained or a more descriptive account of evidence and arguments
suggesting that sociological research cannot/should not be value free.

• Reasonable knowledge and understanding of the view that sociological
research should be value free. The response contains a narrow range of
detailed points or a wider range of underdeveloped points, with some
use of concepts or theory or research evidence.
• The material selected will be largely appropriate but its relevance to the
question may be unclear or confused at times.
• Some analysis/evaluation of the view that sociological research should
be value free. The evaluation may be a simple juxtaposition of different
arguments and theories which are not clearly focused on the question or
a few simple points suggesting that sociological research cannot/should
not be value free.

• Basic knowledge and understanding of the view that sociological
research should be value free. The response contains a narrow range of
underdeveloped points and may include basic references to concepts or
theories or research evidence.
• The material selected is relevant to the topic but lacks focus on or
relevance to the specific question.
• Any analysis or evaluation is likely to be incidental, confused or simply
assertive.

PUBLISHED
5 Level 1: 1–5 marks

• Limited knowledge and understanding of the view that sociological
research should be value free. The response contains only assertive
points or common sense observations.
• There is little or no application of sociological material.
• Little or no relevant analysis or evaluation.
Level 0: 0 marks

Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/12 March 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/12 March 2021

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/12 March 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cambridge International AS & A Level

This document consists of 17 printed pages.

© UCLES 2021 [Turn over

Generic Marking Principles

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 1:

Marks must be awarded in line with:

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 2:

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 3:

Marks must be awarded positively:

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 4:

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 5:

GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 6:

© UCLES 2021 Page 2 of 17

Social Science-Specific Marking Principles

1 Components using point-based marking:

From this it follows that we:

2 Presentation of mark scheme:

© UCLES 2021 Page 3 of 17

© UCLES 2021 Page 4 of 17

Using the mark scheme

Question Annotation Meaning

DEV Development / description of the point.

2a Point that has been credited

E1 Explanation of the point

M Material used to support the point

E2 Explanation of how the material supports the point

2b Strength / weakness that has been credited

E1 Explanation of why the method has that strength/weakness

E2 Explanation of why it is a strength/weakness

3a Point that has been credited

EXP Some explanation but underdeveloped rather than developed

DEV Developed point

M Material used to support the point

© UCLES 2021 Page 5 of 17

Question Annotation Meaning

3b Point that has been credited

EXP Some explanation but underdeveloped rather than developed

DEV Developed point

M Material used to support the point

4/5 Point that has been credited

EXP Some explanation but underdeveloped rather than developed

DEV Developed point

M Material used to support the point

EVAL Evaluation point

Other SEEN This material receives no credit

BOD Benefit of the doubt given

Vertical wavy Irrelevant material

© UCLES 2021 Page 6 of 17

Question Answer Marks

1 Describe two characteristics of upper-class culture. 4

Reward a maximum of two characteristics. For each characteristic, up to 2

1 mark for identifying a characteristic of upper-class culture.

© UCLES 2021 Page 7 of 17

Question Answer Marks

2(a) Explain two characteristics of the interpretivist approach to 8

• Use of qualitative data/methods.

For this question, use of sociological material is likely to be demonstrated

Reward a maximum of two reasons. Up to 4 marks are available for each

1 mark for making a point / giving a characteristic (e.g. use of qualitative