9 Tactics For Better Remote Negotiations
9 Tactics For Better Remote Negotiations
9 Tactics For Better Remote Negotiations
9Negotiations
Tactics for Better Remote
by Milan Prilepok
July 21, 2021
Summary. Covid has changed the way companies should negotiate. Today all
traditional deal terms are up for grabs and it behooves negotiators to carefully
reevaluate their assumptions, assess their industries, prioritize their asks, and
involve key stakeholders more deeply... more
Whether you’re a manufacturer looking to sign a new supplier
agreement, a tech company trying to close a big commercial
contract, or a retailer wanting to modify its warehousing terms,
the Covid-19 pandemic has changed the way you should
negotiate.
There are two reasons for this.
First, everything — from what and how much you buy, to who or
what you sell, to the length and terms of the contract — is up for
grabs. Savvy negotiators will rethink their assumptions and
evaluate current and anticipated shifts in their industry, assessing
the implications for their own organizations as well as the
changing priorities of their partners. The world of buyer-supplier
relationships that emerges over the next few months may look
very different from the stability, growth, and predictability that
prevailed pre-pandemic.
In this article, I’ll discuss what these two changes mean for how
you should negotiate in the coming months.
A New Landscape
Let’s start with what has changed when it comes to deal terms.
Many traditional terms are getting torn up just at a time when
organizations are renegotiating contracts that won’t expire for
several years. It’s critical to get these right.
There are many reasons for this volatility. For one, every industry
is now starting from a new position. For example, automotive and
aerospace companies have lived through a year of lean demand
and are basically restarting for 2021, while the entertainment
industry is balancing a surge in demand from streaming services
at the same time that virus restrictions made production of new
content challenging. Distressed companies in many sectors are
likely to merge, potentially reducing the number of buyers or
suppliers.
Pricing, too, may be more volatile as supply chain conditions shift
rapidly. Because suppliers now may be unable to meet the full
demand of their customers, buyers may find it advantageous —
though expensive — to get treated as preferred “front-of-the-line”
customers in situations where supply is limited. This is quite a
shift from bargaining on price or long-term volume as they might
have done in the past. Meanwhile, suppliers that can offer more
flexibility in payment terms may find a greater number of
partners. Another promising approach for buyers and sellers alike
is to get creative about non-financial terms such as intellectual
property ownership, exclusivity, access to innovation, risk-
sharing, investments and resource contributions, and contract
flexibility.
MP
Milan Prilepok is partner and global leader of
the negotiation service line at McKinsey. He is a
former lecturer at The Wharton School and has
taught at industry conferences and roundtables
on negotiations at Harvard Business School,
London School of Economics, Women in
Negotiations (WIN), and the Conference Board,
among others.