High Performance Liquid Chromatography
High Performance Liquid Chromatography
High Performance Liquid Chromatography
Introduction
Operation
Applications
Manufacturing
Research
Conclusion
References
High Performance
Liquid Chromatography
1
Introduction
HPLC has been used for manufacturing during the production process of
pharmaceutical and biological products), legal (e.g., detecting performance
enhancement drugs in urine), research separating the components of a
complex biological sample, or of similar synthetic chemicals from each
other), and medical detecting vitamin D levels in blood serum) purposes.
3
The schematic of an HPLC instrument typically includes a degasser, sampler,
pumps, and a detector. The sampler brings the sample mixture into the
mobile phase stream which carries it into the column. The pumps deliver the
desired flow and composition of the mobile phase through the column. The
detector generates a signal proportional to the amount of sample component
emerging from the column, hence allowing for quantitative analysis of the
sample components. A digital microprocessor and user software control the
HPLC instrument and provide data analysis. Some models of mechanical
pumps in an HPLC instrument can mix multiple solvents together in ratios
changing in time, generating a composition gradient in the mobile phase.
Various detectors are in common use, such as UV/Vis, photodiode array
(PDA) or based on mass spectrometry. Most HPLC instruments also have a
column oven that allows for adjusting the temperature at which the separation
is performed.
4
Ion exchange chromatography: retention by electrostatic interaction
with the stationary phase.
Affinity chromatography: retention comparable to adsorption
chromatography; interaction of tailor-made stationary phases with
biomolecules (lock and key principle).
Size exclusion chromatography: retention by permeation into the pores
of a stationary phase and steric exclusion of analytes (e.g., gel
permeation chromatography, gel chromatography, gel filtration).
5
History and development
Following on the seminal work of Martin and Synge in 1941, it was predicted
by Calvin Giddings, Josef Huber, and others in the 1960s that LC could be
operated in the high-efficiency mode by reducing the packing-particle
diameter substantially below the typical LC (and GC) level of 150 μm and
using pressure to increase the mobile phase velocity. These predictions
underwent extensive experimentation and refinement throughout the 60s into
the 70s. Early developmental research began to improve LC particles, and the
invention of Zipax, a superficially porous particle, was promising for HPLC
technology.
7
Quantification experiments in analytical HPLC
8
Operation
9
Many different types of columns are available, filled with adsorbents varying
in particle size, porosity, and surface chemistry. The use of smaller particle
size packing materials requires the use of higher operational pressure
("backpressure") and typically improves chromatographic resolution (the
degree of peak separation between consecutive analytes emerging from the
column). Sorbent particles may be hydrophobic or polar in nature.
Common mobile phases used include any miscible combination of water with
various organic solvents (the most common are acetonitrile and methanol).
Some HPLC techniques use water-free mobile phases (see normal-phase
chromatography below). The aqueous component of the mobile phase may
contain acids (such as formic, phosphoric or trifluoroacetic acid) or salts to
assist in the separation of the sample components. The composition of the
mobile phase may be kept constant ("isocratic elution mode") or varied
("gradient elution mode") during the chromatographic analysis. Isocratic
elution is typically effective in the separation of sample components that are
very different in their affinity for the stationary phase. In gradient elution the
composition of the mobile phase is varied typically from low to high eluting
strength. The eluting strength of the mobile phase is reflected by analyte
retention times with high eluting strength producing fast elution (=short
retention times). A typical gradient profile in reversed phase chromatography
might start at 5% acetonitrile (in water or aqueous buffer) and progress
linearly to 95% acetonitrile over 5–25 minutes. Periods of constant mobile
phase composition may be part of any gradient profile.
Types
10
Partition chromatography
11
The polar analytes diffuse into a stationary water layer associated with the
polar stationary phase and are thus retained. The stronger the interactions
between the polar analyte and the polar stationary phase (relative to the
mobile phase) the longer the elution time. The interaction strength depends
on the functional groups part of the analyte molecular structure, with more
polarized groups (e.g., hydroxyl-) and groups capable of hydrogen bonding
inducing more retention. Coulombic (electrostatic) interactions can also
increase retention. Use of more polar solvents in the mobile phase will
decrease the retention time of the analytes, whereas more hydrophobic
solvents tend to increase retention times.
12
System setup and settings
Every single HPLC system has its own characteristics, and these can change
over time—either due to wear of instrument parts, or by a variation of the
setup by the operator. The following chapter describes important system
parameters and their influence on chromatographic results and gives
recommendations for system optimization.
13
Dwell volume and dead volume the dwell volume of an HPLC instrument is
the combined volume of all system parts from the solvent mixer to the head
of the column. Aside from the capillary connecting the outlet of the injector
to the inlet of the column, this volume is usually typical for a given
instrument. The pump unit of an HPLC system can be either a low or a high
pressure gradient system. In case of the former, dosing is controlled by a
valve, and the mixing of up to four solvents takes place on the low pressure
side of one single pump. Due to this construction, the dwell volume of such a
pump system is relatively large. In contrast, highpressure gradient systems
are composed out of two (or three) pumps and each pump is dedicated to one
single solvent. Mixing is performed on the high-pressure side of the pump
system and dosing of the solvents is controlled by the relative flow rates of
each of the pumps. The dwell volume of high-pressure gradients is small, but
due to the construction, these systems are comparably expensive. Modern
UHPLC instruments (low or high-pressure gradient systems) display very
small dwell volumes, a prerequisite when working at low flow rates.
Depending on the prerequisites of a separation, the design and length of the
connecting tubing may change, e.g. when working at temperatures below or
above room temperature, or when analyzing biomolecules. Under these
conditions, the use of inert polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rather than of
stainless steel tubing is recommended. In gradient separations, large dwell
volumes are undesirable as they smooth and delay a gradient and cause
increased equilibration times, but as a consequence, isocratic separations are
not negatively affected by the size of the dwell volume.
14
Thermostatting
15
somewhat isothermal setup. Chromatography at elevated temperatures aims
at maximizing separation efficiency. Due to this desire, the combination of an
adiabatic approach with an eluent preheater is mandatory in order to avoid
the formation of a radial temperature gradient inside the chromatographic
column. In UHPLC experiments, friction of the mobile phase leads to the
generation of heat inside a column. The application of isothermal conditions
then results in a radial temperature gradient that compromises
chromatographic results. In contrast, under adiabatic conditions, an axial
temperature gradient is generated that does not negatively affect
performance. However, it is worth mentioning that the temperature of a
separation should be adjusted to the properties of the column housing, as well
as to the specific characteristics of the column packing material. A polymeric
column backbone can be operated at higher temperatures without column
16
deterioration, whereas the solubility of silica-based stationary phases
increases rapidly under such conditions. Of course, in addition to the
temperature, the pH of an eluent has to also be taken into account. For details,
see section on mobile phase composition. Whatever system is used, it is
important to work under equilibrated conditions. The heat conductivity of a
stainless steel column housing is high, therefore stationary phase temperature
most likely matches column oven temperature. On the other hand, the heat
conduction coefficient of columns utilizing PEEK housing is lower as
compared to steel. If the difference between oven and mobile phase
temperature becomes large, a temperature gradient may appear inside
columns with PEEK housing that negatively affects peak shape and
separation efficiency. Figure 18 shows the influence of temperature on the
plate height achievable with an RP-18 endcapped 50–2 monolithic silica
column. As a reason of this it is recommended to install a metal capillary
with 1/16‘‘ outer diameter and 0.2 mm inner diameter (length 30 cm) in front
of columns with PEEK housing. The higher the flow rate of the mobile phase,
the more important a pre-heated mobile phase is. Another option for
thermostatting of eluents is the combined use of metal capillaries and a water
bath and a column oven. Depending on the HPLC system, mobile phase pre-
heating modules can be a general alternative to the use of metal capillaries
(and a water bath).
17
System care and maintenance
A system suitability test (SST) should be performed with any HPLC system
and needs to be independent of its use. The SST delivers information about
the suitability of a combination of a chromatographic column and an HPLC
system in terms of selectivity or other predefined criteria for a specific type
of sample under the given chromatographic and instrumental conditions. In a
pharmaceutical environment, such an SST is mandatory and has to be
conducted regularly (every workday morning), or prior to a new analysis
sequence. The chromatographic properties of the sample utilized in such a
test have to be similar to the real samples analyzed in subsequent runs.
Knowledge about the system back pressure under specific conditions allows
for a calculation of net column back pressures and a good comparability of
different chromatographic columns under identical chromatographic
conditions. Changes in system back pressure can help to identify system
wear. The system back pressure can be determined by performing an HPLC
run without installed chromatographic column. The HPLC instrument has to
be flushed with organic solvent regularly to prevent microbial contamination
and its negative effects, mainly on highly sensitive mass spectrometric
detection. Use alcohols such as methanol or isopropanol for this means. To a
certain degree, acetonitrile can be contaminated with amines, these adsorb on
the sapphire seats and balls of check valves, subsequently polymerize and can
block inlet valves. Ceramic check valves do not seem to be affected in a
similar manner. The frequency of flushing depends on the utilized eluents
and buffer concentration, and should be between two to four weeks. If
18
possible, at least 5% of organic solvent should be added to the aqueous
mobile phase. An inversion of eluent channels can also help to avoid
microbial contamination. If a buffer was used prior to instrument flushing,
make sure the salt is soluble in the organic solvent or that water is used for
flushing before switching to an organic solvent. If an HPLC is not used for
prolonged periods of time, flush the entire instrument with alcohol. Pump
debris is collected in the pump inlet filter. These compounds might not be
visible using UV detection, but it is likely that they can be detected via MS.
19
The filter should therefore be replaced every 1–2 months, or after changing
from acetonitrile to methanol (or vice versa) in order to obtain lower baseline
noise and to generally protect the system including column and detector.
HPLC systems are equipped with a solvent mixture bottle dedicated to
autosampler washing. This mixture normally contains water and
approximately 5–10% of an organic solvent such as isopropanol for better
wettability. It is common practice in many laboratories to keep the
composition of this mixture constant and utilize it independent of the type of
method (isocratic or gradient) as well as stationary phase (reversed or normal
phase as well as HILIC). After an autosampler needle-washing step, part of
the washing solution is transferred to the chromatographic system. As long as
chromatography is done in reversed phase mode (the organic solvent is the
strong solvent), low amounts of organic solvent will hardly affect the result
of an isocratic or gradient run. By contrast, water is the strong eluent under
HILIC conditions. If the autosampler washing solution composition is not
adapted, the effect will be comparable to the injection of a sample dissolved
in a highly aqueous solvent mixture. This can cause peak shape issues such as
peak splitting or broadening, as well as decreased retention. Therefore, the
amount of strong solvent in the autosampler washing solution (as well as in
the sample solvent itself) has to be kept lower than the content in the mobile
phase starting composition. When preparing a sample for reversed phase
analysis, the sample has to be dissolved completely; ideally in the mobile
phase (gradient runs: initial composition). Solubility of the sample in the
eluent has to be tested prior to injection.
Normal–phase chromatography
20
Normal–phase chromatography was one of the first kinds of HPLC that
chemists developed. Also known as normal-phase HPLC (NP-HPLC) this
method separates analytes based on their affinity for a polar stationary
surface such as silica, hence it is based on analyte ability to engage in polar
interactions (such as hydrogen-bonding or dipole-dipole type of interactions)
with the sorbent surface. NP-HPLC uses a non-polar, non-aqueous mobile
phase and works effectively for separating analytes readily soluble in non-
polar solvents. The analyte associates with and is retained by the polar
stationary phase. Adsorption strengths increase with increased analyte
polarity. The interaction strength depends not only on the functional groups
present in the structure of the analyte molecule, but also on steric factors. The
effect of steric hindrance on interaction strength allows this method to resolve
(separate) structural isomers.
The use of more polar solvents in the mobile phase will decrease the retention
time of analytes, whereas more hydrophobic solvents tend to induce slower
elution (increased retention times). Very polar solvents such as traces of
water in the mobile phase tend to adsorb to the solid surface of the stationary
phase forming a stationary bound (water) layer which is considered to play an
active role in retention. This behavior is somewhat peculiar to normal phase
chromatography because it is governed almost exclusively by an adsorptive
mechanism (i.e., analytes interact with a solid surface rather than with the
solvated layer of a ligand attached to the sorbent surface; see also reversed-
phase HPLC below). Adsorption chromatography is still widely used for
structural isomer separations in both column and thin-layer chromatography
formats on activated (dried) silica or alumina supports.
21
Partition- and NP-HPLC fell out of favor in the 1970s with the development
of reversed-phase HPLC because of poor reproducibility of retention times
due to the presence of a water or protic organic solvent layer on the surface of
the silica or alumina chromatographic media. This layer changes with any
changes in the composition of the mobile phase (e.g., moisture level) causing
drifting retention times.
22
Displacement chromatography
23
Reversed-phase chromatography (RPC)
24
polar segment of the analyte molecule upon association with the ligand on the
stationary phase. This solvophobic effect is dominated by the force of water
for "cavity-reduction" around the analyte and the C18-chain versus the
complex of both. The energy released in this process is proportional to the
surface tension of the eluent (water: 7.3×10−6 J/cm2, methanol: 2.2×10−6
J/cm2) and to the hydrophobic surface of the analyte and the ligand
respectively. The retention can be decreased by adding a less polar solvent
(methanol, acetonitrile) into the mobile phase to reduce the surface tension of
water. Gradient elution uses this effect by automatically reducing the polarity
and the surface tension of the aqueous mobile phase during the course of the
analysis.
25
Retention time increases with hydrophobic (non-polar) surface area.
Branched chain compounds elute more rapidly than their corresponding
linear isomers because the overall surface area is decreased. Similarly organic
compounds with single C–C bonds elute later than those with a C=C or C–C
triple bond, as the double or triple bond is shorter than a single C–C bond.
Another important factor is the mobile phase pH since it can change the
hydrophobic character of the analyte. For this reason most methods use a
buffering agent, such as sodium phosphate, to control the pH. Buffers serve
multiple purposes: control of pH, neutralize the charge on the silica surface of
the stationary phase and act as ion pairing agents to neutralize analyte charge.
Ammonium formate is commonly added in mass spectrometry to improve
detection of certain analytes by the formation of analyte-ammonium adducts.
26
A volatile organic acid such as acetic acid, or most commonly formic acid, is
often added to the mobile phase if mass spectrometry is used to analyze the
column eluant. Trifluoroacetic acid is used infrequently in mass spectrometry
applications due to its persistence in the detector and solvent delivery system,
but can be effective in improving retention of analytes such as carboxylic
acids in applications utilizing other detectors, as it is a fairly strong organic
acid. The effects of acids and buffers vary by application but generally
improve chromatographic resolution.
Reversed phase columns are quite difficult to damage compared with normal
silica columns; however, many reversed phase columns consist of alkyl
derivatized silica particles and should never be used with aqueous bases as
these will destroy the underlying silica particle. They can be used with
aqueous acid, but the column should not be exposed to the acid for too long,
as it can corrode the metal parts of the HPLC equipment. RP-HPLC columns
should be flushed with clean solvent after use to remove residual acids or
buffers, and stored in an appropriate composition of solvent. The metal
content of HPLC columns must be kept low if the best possible ability to
separate substances is to be retained. A good test for the metal content of a
column is to inject a sample which is a mixture of 2,2'- and 4,4'-bipyridine.
Because the 2,2'-bipy can chelate the metal, the shape of the peak for the 2,2'-
bipy will be distorted (tailed) when metal ions are present on the surface of
the silica.
27
Size-exclusion chromatography
Ion-exchange chromatography
Types of ion exchangers include polystyrene resins, cellulose and dextran ion
exchangers (gels), and controlled-pore glass or porous silica. Polystyrene
resins allow cross linkage which increases the stability of the chain. Higher
cross linkage reduces swerving, which increases the equilibration time and
ultimately improves selectivity. Cellulose and dextran ion exchangers possess
larger pore sizes and low charge densities making them suitable for protein
separation
In general, ion exchangers favor the binding of ions of higher charge and
smaller radius.
29
This form of chromatography is widely used in the following applications:
water purification, preconcentration of trace components, ligand-exchange
chromatography, ion-exchange chromatography of proteins, high-pH anion-
exchange chromatography of carbohydrates and oligosaccharides, and others.
Bioaffinity chromatography
30
Isocratic and gradient elution
31
wide range of retention factors. Using a weaker mobile phase, the runtime is
lengthened and results in slowly eluting peaks to be broad, leading to reduced
sensitivity. A stronger mobile phase would improve issues of runtime and
broadening of later peaks but results in diminished peak separation,
especially for quickly eluting analytes which may have insufficient time to
fully resolve. This issue is addressed through the changing mobile phase
composition of gradient elution.
32
By starting from a weaker mobile phase and strengthening it during the
runtime, gradient elution decreases the retention of the later-eluting
components so that they elute faster, giving narrower (and taller) peaks for
most components, while also allowing for the adequate separation of earlier-
eluting components. This also improves the peak shape for tailed peaks, as
the increasing concentration of the organic eluent pushes the tailing part of a
peak forward. This also increases the peak height (the peak looks "sharper"),
which is important in trace analysis. The gradient program may include
sudden "step" increases in the percentage of the organic component, or
different slopes at different times – all according to the desire for optimum
separation in minimum time.
In isocratic elution, the selectivity does not change if the column dimensions
(length and inner diameter) change – that is, the peaks elute in the same
order. In gradient elution, the elution order may change as the dimensions or
flow rate change.
33
Parameters
35
Internal diameter
Analytical scale columns (4.6 mm) have been the most common type of
columns, though smaller columns are rapidly gaining in popularity. They are
used in traditional quantitative analysis of samples and often use a UV-Vis
absorbance detector.
Narrow-bore columns (1–2 mm) are used for applications when more
sensitivity is desired either with special UV-vis detectors, fluorescence
detection or with other detection methods like liquid chromatography-mass
spectrometry
36
Capillary columns (under 0.3 mm) are used almost exclusively with
alternative detection means such as mass spectrometry. They are usually
made from fused silica capillaries, rather than the stainless steel tubing that
larger columns employ.
Particle size
Most traditional HPLC is performed with the stationary phase attached to the
outside of small spherical silica particles (very small beads). These particles
come in a variety of sizes with 5 µm beads being the most common. Smaller
particles generally provide more surface area and better separations, but the
pressure required for optimum linear velocity increases by the inverse of the
particle diameter squared.
37
Pore size
Many stationary phases are porous to provide greater surface area. Small
pores provide greater surface area while larger pore size has better kinetics,
especially for larger analytes. For example, a protein which is only slightly
smaller than a pore might enter the pore but does not easily leave once inside.
Pump pressure
38
Applications
Manufacturing
Legal
This technique is also used for detection of illicit drugs in urine. The most
common method of drug detection is an immunoassay. This method is much
more convenient. However, convenience comes at the cost of specificity and
coverage of a wide range of drugs. As HPLC is a method of determining (and
possibly increasing) purity, using HPLC alone in evaluating concentrations of
drugs is somewhat insufficient. With this, HPLC in this context is often
performed in conjunction with mass spectrometry. Using liquid
chromatography instead of gas chromatography in conjunction with MS
39
circumvents the necessity for derivitizing with acetylating or alkylation
agents, which can be a burdensome extra step. This technique has been used
to detect a variety of agents like doping agents, drug metabolites, glucuronide
conjugates, amphetamines, opioids, cocaine, BZDs, ketamine, LSD,
cannabis, and pesticides. Performing HPLC in conjunction with mass
spectrometry reduces the absolute need for standardizing HPLC experimental
runs.
Research
Medical
Medical use of HPLC can include drug analysis, but falls more closely under
the category of nutrient analysis. While urine is the most common medium
for analyzing drug concentrations, blood serum is the sample collected for
most medical analyses with HPLC. Other methods of detection of molecules
that are useful for clinical studies have been tested against HPLC, namely
40
immunoassays. In one example of this, competitive protein binding assays
(CPBA) and HPLC were compared for sensitivity in detection of vitamin D.
Useful for diagnosing vitamin D deficiencies in children, it was found that
sensitivity and specificity of this CPBA reached only 40% and 60%,
respectively, of the capacity of HPLC. While an expensive tool, the accuracy
of HPLC is nearly unparalleled.
41
Conclusion
42
References
1. Gerber, F.; Krummen, M.; Potgeter, H.; Roth, A.; Siffrin, C.;
Spoendlin, C. (2004). "Practical aspects of fast reversed-phase high-
performance liquid chromatography using 3μm particle packed
columns and monolithic columns in pharmaceutical development and
production working under current good manufacturing practice".
Journal of Chromatography A. 1036 (2): 127–133.
doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2004.02.056. PMID 15146913.
2. Morgan, David J. (2003-11-19). "Fraction collector (post on Flickr)".
Flickr. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
3. Karger, Barry L. (1997). "HPLC: Early and Recent Perspectives".
Journal of Chemical Education. 74 (1): 45.
Bibcode:1997JChEd..74...45K. doi:10.1021/ed074p45.
4. Henry, Richard A. (1 February 2009) "The Early Days of HPLC at
Dupont". Chromatography Online. Avanstar Communications Inc.
5. Iler, R.K. (1979) The Chemistry of Silica. John Wiley & Sons. New
York.
6. Karger, B. L.; Berry, L. V. (1971). "Rapid liquid-chromatographic
separation of steroids on columns heavily loaded with stationary
phase". Clin. Chem. 17 (8): 757–64. doi:10.1093/clinchem/17.8.757.
PMID 4254537.
7. Giddings, J. Calvin (1965) Dynamics of Chromatography, Part I.
Principles and Theory. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. p. 281.
43
8. Ettre, C. (2001). "Milestones in Chromatography: The Birth of Partition
Chromatography" (PDF). LCGC. 19 (5): 506–512. Retrieved 2016-02-
26.
9. Martin, A J P; Synge, R L M (1941). "Separation of the higher
monoamino-acids by counter-current liquid-liquid extraction: the
amino-acid composition of wool". Biochemical Journal. 35 (1–2): 91–
121. doi:10.1042/bj0350091. PMC 1265473. PMID 16747393.
10. Lindsay, S.; Kealey, D. (1987). High performance liquid
chromatography. Wiley. OSTI 7013902. from review Hung, L. B.;
Parcher, J. F.; Shores, J. C.; Ward, E. H. (1988). "Theoretical and
experimental foundation for surface-coverage programming in gas–
solid chromatography with an adsorbable carrier gas". J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 110 (11): 1090–1096. doi:10.1021/ac00162a003.
11. Displacement Chromatography. Sacheminc.com. Retrieved 2011-
06-07. Archived September 15, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
12. Snyder, Lloyd R.; Dolan, John W. (2006). High-Performance
Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-
Strength Model. Wiley Interscience. ISBN 978-0470055519.
13. Majors, Ronald E.. (2010-09-07) Fast and Ultrafast HPLC on
sub-2 μm Porous Particles — Where Do We Go From Here? – LC-GC
Europe. Lcgceurope.com. Retrieved 2011-06-07.
14. Xiang, Y.; Liu Y.; Lee M.L. (2006). "Ultrahigh pressure liquid
chromatography using elevated temperature". Journal of
Chromatography A. 1104 (1–2): 198–202.
doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2005.11.118. PMID 16376355.
44