Module 5b Columns - Lesson 2 ASD
Module 5b Columns - Lesson 2 ASD
Module 5b Columns - Lesson 2 ASD
I. LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson, the student will be able to:
It was the Structural Stability Research Council (SSRC) Strength Curves, the Parabolic
Equation which become the basis for Allowable Stress Design (1960 – 2004)
Based upon the methods, column strength curve can be obtained for weak- or
strong axis with various distributions of residual stress. For most practical situations it
has been reported that an assumed linear distribution of residual stresses in flanges
results in a reasonable column curves. Furthermore , the development shows that for
the same slenderness ratio , H – shape column sections allowed to bend in weak
direction can carry less load than column allowed to bend only in strong direction.
Compressive residual stress which is greatest at the flange tips accounts for this
strength difference.
Typical column strength curves for parabolic and linear distribution of residual
stresses across the flange is shown below.
Since 1960, and until the AISC 2005 specification structural steel design according to
Allowable Stress Design Specification has used the SSRC parabolic equation based on
the one proposed by Bleich. The SSRC parabolic curve is
𝐹𝑦 𝐾𝐿 2
𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 𝐹𝑦 [1 − (𝑟) ] Eqn 6.7.1
4𝜋2 𝐸
The SSRC curve fairly gives good agreement with the weak-axis curve for H – shape
sections, particularly when it is noted that parabolic residual stress is more
representative of the actual than linear residual stress.
From the graph above , one may note that to provide the same degree of safety for all
columns, different strength curves would be required depending on expected residual
stress distribution, shape of the section and the axis of bending when the column
buckles.
Also, the above Figure introduces the slenderness function 𝜆𝑐 , which was used as the
slenderness parameter instead of (𝐾𝐿⁄𝑟) in all previous edition of AISC LRFD. In 2005
Specs 𝜆𝑐 replaces 𝐾𝐿⁄𝑟. The slenderness parameter is defined as
𝐹𝑦 𝐹𝑦
𝜆𝑐 = = 𝜋2 𝐸
𝐹𝑐𝑟 𝐸𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑟
(𝐾𝐿⁄𝑟)2
𝐾𝐿 𝐹𝑦
𝜆𝑐 = √
𝑟 𝜋2 𝐸
𝐹𝑐𝑟 𝜆2𝑐
=1 − for 𝜆𝑐 ≤ √2
𝐹𝑦 4
Note that 𝜆𝑐 = √2 the the parabola and Euler hyperbola are tangent to each other.
Thus the above equation applies for 𝜆𝑐 ≤ √2 ; for greater value of 𝜆𝑐 , the Euler
equation applies .
𝐹𝑐𝑟 1
= for 𝜆𝑐 ≥ √2
𝐹𝑦 𝜆2𝑐
2.0 Euler Formula
Euler formula was used to analyze and design column where 𝑓𝑒 is always checked to be
less than the proportional limit (i.e. columns are all slender/long column). Practical
columns however do not fall into this category. The practical analysis/design method
must concern itself with the possible range of slenderness ratio 𝐾𝐿⁄𝑟. Theoretical
formulas are not applicable for intermediate and short columns because of many
material and geometric uncertainties. The strength of intermediate and short columns
cannot be predicted accurately theoretically; therefore, the results of extensive testing
and experience must be utilized.
Note:
a) Maximum 𝐾𝐿⁄𝑟 = 200 (compression members)
b) Allowable compressive stress on gross section is denoted by 𝐹𝑎 .
c) The value of which separates elastic buckling from inelastic buckling is obtained
by taking 𝑓𝑒 = 𝐹𝑦 ⁄2. This 𝐾𝐿⁄𝑟 = 𝐶𝑐
𝜋2 𝐸
From: 𝑓𝑒 = 2
(𝐾𝐿⁄2)
𝐹𝑦 𝐾𝐿⁄ = 𝐶
let: 𝑓𝑒 = ⁄ and 𝑟
2 𝑐
𝐹𝑦 𝜋2 𝐸
then: = (𝐶𝑐 )2
2
2𝜋2 𝐸
𝐶𝑐 = √
𝐹𝑦
3
5 3(𝐾𝐿⁄𝑟) (𝐾𝐿⁄𝑟)
𝐹𝑠 = + −
3 8𝐶𝑐 8𝐶𝑐 3
Case 2 : 𝐾𝐿⁄ ≥ 𝐶
𝑟 𝑐
12𝜋 2 𝐸
𝐹𝑎 = 2
23(𝐾𝐿⁄𝑟)
𝐾𝐿
𝐹𝑎 = 110.3 − 0.414 ( )
𝑟
2) Rankine-Gordon Formula
124
𝐹𝑎 = 2
(𝐾𝐿⁄𝑟)
1+
18000