Gina
Gina
Gina
They also warn of two serious consequences if we do not sharply lower birth
rates. First, death rates may increase because of declining health and
environmental conditions in some areas, as is already happening in parts of Africa.
Second, resource use and degradation of normally renewable resources may
intensify as more consumers increase their already large ecological footprints in
developed countries and in rapidly developing countries. This debate over
whether there are limits on human popula-tion growth and resource consumption
is one of the most impor-tant and controversial issues in environmental science.
CONCEPT 6-1 We do not know how long we can continue increasing the earth’s
carrying capacity for humans without seriously degrading the life support system
that keeps us and many other species alive.
population?
CONCEPT 6-2A Population size increases through births and immigration and
decreases through deaths and emigration.
growth or decline?
CONCEPT 6-3 The numbers of males and females in young, middle, and older
age groups determine how fast a population grows or declines.
6-5 What are the major urban resource and environmental problems?
CONCEPT 6-5 Most cities are unsustainable because of high levels of resource use,
waste, pollution, and poverty.
environmental impacts?
CONCEPT 6-6 In some countries, most people live in dispersed urban areas and
depend mostly on motor vehicles for their transportation.
CONCEPT 6-7 An ecocity allows people to choose walking, biking, or mass transit
for most transportation needs; recycle or reuse most of their wastes; grow much
of their food; and protect biodiversity by preserving surrounding land.
First, humans developed the ability to expand into almost all of the planet’s
climate zones and habi-tats. Second, the emergence of early and modern agri-
culture allowed us to grow more food for each unit of land area farmed. Third,
death rates dropped sharply because of improved sanitation and health care and
development of antibiotics and vaccines to help control infectious diseases. Thus,
most of the increase in the world’s population during the last 100 years took
place because of a sharp drop in death rates—not a sharp rise in birth rates.
We Do Not Know How Long the Human Population Can Keep Growing
To survive and provide resources for growing num-bers of people, humans have
modified, cultivated, built on, and degraded a large and increasing portion of the
earth’s natural systems. Our activities have directly affected, to some degree,
about 83% of the earth’s land surface, excluding Antarctica, as our ecological
footprints have spread across the globe. We have used technology to alter natural
systems to meet our growing needs and wants in eight major ways. Scientific
studies of populations of other species tell us that no population can continue
growing indefinitely. How long can we continue to increase the earth’s carrying
capacity for our species by sidestepping many of the factors that sooner or later
limit thegrowth of any population?No one knows how close we are to
environmental limits that will control the size of the human population, but
mounting evidence indicates that we are steadily degrading the natural capital
that keeps us and other species alive and supports our economies . How many
people can the earth support indefi-nitely? Some say about 2 billion. Others say
as many as 50 billion. Some analysts believe this is the wrong question. Instead,
they believe,we should ask what is the planet’s cultural carrying capacity. This
would be the max-imum number of people that the earth could support at a
reasonable level of comfort and freedom without impairing the planet’s ability to
sustain future genera-tions in the same way. (See the Guest Essay by Gar-rett
Hardin at CengageNOW™.) Choosing whether or not and how to reach such a goal
is primarily an ethical decision based on values that differ widely.