0% found this document useful (0 votes)
67 views

Lab 5 Solid

The document describes an experiment to determine internal forces in statically determinate and indeterminate cantilever truss members. Students recorded strain readings from strain sensors on truss members as loads were applied. Theoretical forces were calculated and compared to experimental results, with percent errors determined. Sources of error and differences between theoretical and experimental results were discussed.

Uploaded by

Syahmi Channel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
67 views

Lab 5 Solid

The document describes an experiment to determine internal forces in statically determinate and indeterminate cantilever truss members. Students recorded strain readings from strain sensors on truss members as loads were applied. Theoretical forces were calculated and compared to experimental results, with percent errors determined. Sources of error and differences between theoretical and experimental results were discussed.

Uploaded by

Syahmi Channel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI DAN KEJURUTERAAN MEKANIKAL

UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA

BMKT 2323 SOLID MECHANICS

LAB SHEET 5

FORCES IN TRUSSES 2

INSTRUCTOR’S NAME DR AHMAD FUAD BIN ABDUL RASID

STUDENT’S NAME MATRIX NO:


S1. MUHAMMAD HARDY BIN HAZRAMY B092210020
S2. AHMAD NUR SYAHMI BIN AHMAD YUSDI B092210497
S3. MUHAMMAD NUR HAFIZZUDDIN BIN SALIM B092210289
S4.
S5.

Learning Outcome LO2 Identify and display appropriate experimental techniques in


(LO):
mechanics of material through laboratory experiments.
Program Outcome: PO5 Ability to select and apply appropriate techniques, resources and
modern engineering tools, with an understanding of their limitations.
Synopsis: This lab activity will enrich students’ knowledge on forces in trusses. Students
are exposed to the concept of determining the internal forces and normal or axial
strains in statically determinate and statically indeterminate cantilever truss
members subjected to a given loading.
Related Lecture’s 1. Equilibrium of a deformable body (Topic 1)
Topic:
2. Strain (Topic 2)
3. Mechanical properties of material (Topic 3)
4. Axial load (Topic 4)
Prepared by: Dr Olawale Friday Ifayefunmi Date: 20 Apr 2020

Approved by Dr Muhammad Ilman Hakimi Chua Bin Date


LM/SLM/HOD Abdullah

Approved By: ………………………………………………..…..

Date: …………………………………………….........
1.0 THEORY

A truss is a structure composed of slender members joined together at their end joints. The members
commonly used in construction consist of wooden or metal struts or bars. The end connections are
usually formed by bolting or welding the ends of the members to a common plate called a gusset
plate, as shown in Figure 1-b, or by simply passing a large bolt or pin through each of the members,
Figure 1-b.

Figure 1 Internal forces truss

To design both the members and the connections of a truss, it is necessary to determine the force
developed in each truss member when the truss system is subjected to a given loading. In this
regard two important assumptions will be made:
a. All loadings are applied at the joints.
b. The truss members are joined together by smooth pins.

Because of the two assumptions, each truss member acts as a two-force member and therefore the
forces at the ends of the member must be directed along the axis of the

member. If the force tends to elongate the member, it is a tensile force (T), Figure 2(a), and if it
tends to shorten the member, it is a compressive force (C), Figure 2(b).
In static equilibrium the truss members will satisfy the following conditions:
 Fx = 0 (1)
 Fy = 0 (2)
M = 0 (3)
When material properties are used to determine force in truss member the following equation will be
needed.
From Hooke’s law :  = E (4)
where
 = Stress in the member (N/m2)
E = Young’s modulus (N/m2)
 = Displayed axial strain produced in truss member
and  = F/A (5)
where
F = Force in member (N)
A = Cross-sectional area of member (m2)
From equations (4) and (5),
F = AE (6)

2.0 EQUIPMENTS/ EXPERIMENT APPARATUS/ CONSUMABLE MATERIALS


Layout of the apparatus and its schematic diagram are shown in Figure 4.

1. Fixed base
2. Roller base
3. Steel bars with strain sensor (strain gauges)
4. Load controller

3.0 PROCEDURES/ METHODOLOGY


Experiment 1 –Forces in a Statically Determinate Cantilever Truss

Figure 3: Statically Determinate Cantilever Truss

Statically Determinate Cantilever Truss is a common structures. They are usually used for bridges
and in cantilevered form for crane booms.

1. Make sure the Redundant Member’s thumbwheel is loosened.


2. Apply loads until 250 N in the increment of 50 N and record the strain readings in table 1.
3. Record all the readings.
4. Assume that Esteel = 210 GPa for all truss members. Rod diameter = 5.98 mm:.

Experiment 2 –Forces in a Statically Indeterminate Cantilever Truss

Statically Indeterminate Cantilever Truss is also a common structure. They are usually used for
bridges and in cantilevered form for crane booms.

1. Make sure the Redundant Member’s thumbwheel is tightened by fingers.


2. Apply loads until 250 N in the increment of 50 N and record the strain readings in table 3.
3. Record all the readings.
4. Assume that Esteel = 210 GPa for all truss members. Rod diameter = 5.98 mm.

4.0 RESULTS
EXPERIMENTAL DATA (EXPERIMENT 1)

Table 1 Experiment Member Strains Results for an Idealised Cantilever Truss:


Load (N) Member strains ()

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0 - 31 19 32 73 - 47 -8 99
50 - 21 10 23 55 - 46 7 - 86
100 - 10 -1 13 33 - 46 22 - 71
150 -1 - 10 5 15 - 46 36 - 57
200 6 - 18 -3 0 - 46 46 - 47
250 17 - 29 - 13 - 21 - 47 62 - 32

EXPERIMENTAL RESULT (EXPERIMENT 1)


1. Theoretically, calculate internal force in each member with a load of 250 N. (E steel = 210 GPa)
and write down in Table 2.

Table 2 Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Forces at 250 N.

Theoretical Forces Error (%)


Member Experimental Forces (N)
(N)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

2. By using the measured data, calculate internal force (experimental force) in each member with
a load 500 N. (Esteel = 210 GPa) and write down in Table 2.
3. Determine the percentage of error between the experimental and theoretical force. Complete
Table 3 and write down in Table 2.

EXPERIMENTAL DATA (EXPERIMENT 2)

Table 3 Experiment Member Strains Results for an Idealised Cantilever Truss:


Load (N) Member strains ()

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0 - 30 20 32 73 - 46 21 -6 -98
50 - 18 12 24 56 - 44 19 8 - 87
100 -4 5 14 40 - 39 13 23 - 78
150 10 1 6 27 - 35 7 36 - 71
200 23 -4 -3 14 - 30 -1 48 - 67
250 39 -8 - 12 1 - 24 -9 63 - 60

EXPERIMENTAL RESULT (EXPERIMENT 2)


1. Theoretically, calculate internal force in each member with a load of 250 N. (E steel = 210 GPa)
and write down in Table 4.

Table 4 Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Forces at 250 N.

Theoretical Forces Error (%)


Member Experimental Forces (N)
(N)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

2. By using the measured data, calculate internal force (experimental force) in each member with
a load 500 N. (Esteel = 210 GPa) and write down in Table 4.

3. Determine the percentage of error between the experimental and theoretical force. Complete
Table 3 and write down in Table 4.

5.0 DISCUSSION
For discussion, you should answer all questions as follows:

 Analyze or interpret and comment on the tabulated and graphical results obtained for both
experiments. Explain the relationship exists between the variables involve in this work.

 Discuss and explain the differences between the experimental and theoretical results.

 Identify which truss members are in compression and tension for both experiments. Give the
reason to this behaviour / observation and explain which members will be of the more critical
to be known its behaviour in order to avoid structural failure / collapse.

 State the factor of errors or discrepancies for both experiments. Justify your argument and
suggest how these errors may be eliminated or minimized.

6.0 CONCLUSION
Give your conclusion of this experiment work / report. Summarize its main findings.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy