Polzer AnatomyMasacciosHoly 1971
Polzer AnatomyMasacciosHoly 1971
Polzer AnatomyMasacciosHoly 1971
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Jahrbuch der Berliner
Museen
BY JOSEPH POLZER
Masaccio's Holy Trinity fresco in Santa Maria Novella has the double d
ing one of the most original and admired paintings of the early Renaiss
most travelled (fig. 1). Indeed, it is a miracle it has survived at all. Vas
then covered the fresco with his altar.' In the nineteenth century it
transferred to canvas and moved (in 1860) to the inside wall of the chu
Cavalcaselle, who had observed the fresco before and after this trans
praised it highly, commented on the damage which it sustained as a co
move.2 But the history of its travels does not end there. After the last war
found to be in such a perilous condition that it was thoroughly resto
Fortunately, recent advances in the techniques of restoration permitted
of its surface in that measure in which it can still be admired at this time. This arduous
restoration was thoroughly executed by Leonetto Tintori during the years 1950-54. He
also supervised the return voyage of the Trinity to its original location on the left aisle
wall in the third bay from the church entrance. Its exact location on this wall could be
fixed with considerable precision. The lower portion of the original fresco, depicting a
corpse lying on a sarcophagus, was found in situ just where it had been located by Antonio
Billi.3 The height of the fresco could be precisely fixed by a fragment of the original cor-
nice which was left behind on the wall at the time of the nineteenth century transfer. This
fragment included a plumb line made with a snapped rope which established the central
vertical axis. A lateral was then made with a snapped cord fixed at the level of the inter-
sections of two arcs drawn with a compass which was centered on the plumb line. This
lateral was independent of the level of the church floor. It extended along the lower termi-
nation of the egg frieze, where it can still be observed on the original fresco surface.
These features can be seen on a scale drawing after the fresco made by Leonetto Tintori
(see photo no. 68526 of the Soprintendenza alle Gallerie, Florence).
The experience of the Holy Trinity as it now appears is misleading since it gives the
false impression of completeness. During the nineteenth century transfer the missing
portions - and they include all the border areas - were painted in, and the recent restora-
tion respected this completion of the missing parts in the treatment of the area, largely
destroyed, below the Trinity panel. Closer inspection reveals many buckles and repairs,
surely scars of the many moves and injuries the fresco has suffered. It is indeed a marvel,
The Holy Trinity was painted in buon fresco. Twenty-four giornate can be distin-
guished from the top of the fresco to the bottom of the Trinity panel (fig. 5), around the
level of the step supporting the kneeling donors.6 In the normal sequence, Masaccio,
painted from top downward. As far as possible, his progress followed the architectural
setting around the figures. During the first eight giornate the monumental archway was
completed down to the level of the kneeling donors. The artist then painted most of the
barrel vault in the next two giornate, and only after this did he turn to the figures. The
reason for this procedure is simple enough. The symmetry and order of the composition
is defined by the archway in large measure. Once it is fixed the placement of the figures
poses no great problems.
Naturally, the artist must have begun by locating the dimensions of the fresco on the
wall. He then applied the plaster for the first giornata, which comprises the whole ent-
ablature and cornice extending from the pilaster capitals and the arch frame to the upper
limit of the fresco. The upper portion of the entablature is nearly wholly modern, with
4 I am deeply indebted to Leonetto Tintori for putting the scaffold at my disposal, and for his generous
advice. Eve Borsook, Howard Saalman, Roger Freemantle and Mark Zucker also lent their able assistance
in the taking of measurements. Harvard's Villa I Tatti offered the services of its able photographer, Luigi
Artini, who made many of the enlightening photographs in a raking light to bring out the surface
features.
5 The reader may also wish to consult Robert Oertel, "1Wandmalerei und Zeichnung in Italien", Mit-
teilungen des Kunsthistorischen Institutes in Florenz, Vol. V, 1940, pp. 507 ff.
6 The diagram of the giornate in figure 4 contains two alterations by the writer from the giornate
recorded on the diagram which was prepared by Leonetto Tintori in 1954 (photo: soprintendenza alle
gallerie Florence, no. 68526). The intrados of the arch frame is painted in a giornata after the latter, and
forms part, most probably (see ahead in text), of the giornata comprising the right ionic capital. In the
photo album he so kindly put at the disposal of this writer Tintori marked the separate giornate of the
face and the intrados of the arch frame on a photo of the Holy Trinity fresco before its restoration. In
addition, in the opinion of the writer the area below the right forearm of the Virgin comprising the open
sleeve belongs to giornata 17.
by the ionic capitals, the intrados of the arch frame, and above by t
entablature (fig. 8). This entablature projects a short distance from
side of the entablature is shaded, and its width defined by a snapped
of the moulding of the arch frame are defined by a series of concentric
the surface. A central plumb line crosses the arch frame. Four inden
along this line, forming three equal intervals from the bottom, and
marking the juncture of the underside of the entablature with the
arcs are scratched through the three lower points they are unrelate
the arch frame which consists of three forward staggered strips top
this cyma extends a thin terminal strip which brings the arch frame
of the face of the entablature above, and below of the pilaster strip
ionic columns. All the edges of the mouldings are defined by arcs scratc
The two tondi set in the spandrils are of particular interest (figs.
the compass, and for this reason it was stuccoed over and retouched o
changes in color and texture of the pertinent areas with respect to the
clearly evident. Somewhat below this area is another point from wh
circle defining the bottom edge of the cyma. Beneath it, at a dis
three-quarter centimeters from the center of the rosette, another poin
lishing the circle which marks the termination of the fluting of the r
This termination, at which level the flutes are truncated along a pla
picture plane forming a sort of melon dome seen from the inside, is d
sequence of points marking the terminals of the ridges separating the
are determined by lines scratched free hand into the intonaco.
It can be observed that the same procedure was followed for both to
original surface allows confrontation. Their diameter is about 56 cen
Masaccio formed the grid for painting the right pilaster capital he alr
the location of the tondo. On the vertical defining the left side of th
indented point at 18 centimeters below the bottom edge of the entabl
radius of the tondo. The circumference of the tondo, if extended thro
volute of the overlapping portion of the pilaster capital, passes through th
During the fifth giornata Masaccio painted the ionic capital at the
archway (fig. 11). Its scrutiny reveals indented points used for t
scheme of snapped rope lines. The basic element of this scheme
meters which is the width of the abacus and the height of the cap
shaft. At the left side this square conforms to the edge of the pil
giornata line) and at the top it is coextensive with the upper edge
right side and at the bottom the square crosses the surface of the cap
sharp angle from below. There is also a vertical rope line which sec
width of the arch frame at slightly more than
20 centimeters from the edge of the pilaster.
Indented points are evident at the termina-
tions of the rope lines. In addition, three in-
dented points fix the centers of the volutes and
of the knob situated midway between them.
The arcs of the volutes and the half circle of
8 Masaccio reduced the number of scratched curves and applied them with greater care when he
articulated the moulding of the neck of the capital at the right side of the entrance arch. Also, judging
by the few points and lines Masaccio seemed more certain of how to establish the elliptical optical path
of the upper edge of the column shaft. A tilted square was drawn with its diagonals - visible within the
area of the giornata. Points are marked off on these diagonals so that the ellipse can be inscribed in such
a way that it touches on the midpoints of the sides of the tilted square and crosses the diagonals at the
above mentioned points. How he obtained their location is not clear.
sides of the bases. With these marks the hanging pyramids could be eas
position.
During the two giornate which followed (the seventh and eighth) the
and pilasters were painted down to the kneeling donors. Accordingly, at
eighth giornata the vital figural portion yet to be painted and the most d
tive problem of the sharply receding vault seen di sotto in si' had been
archway. Masaccio then turned to the area within.
At this point perspective and its transfer from preparatory study to wall b
cial problem. How Masaccio went about this task can be observed partia
Fig. 12. See fig. 1. Detail of juncture of left ionic capital with col
scratched firmly into the plaster. The question of how Masaccio determined the center
of the arcs forming the curving ribs, essential to the perspective structure of the vaul
will be examined later. Whatever this procedure may have been, it was too elaborate
be solved during the very giornata of painting. Surely, the points marking these center
must have been fixed beforehand on a scale drawing and transferred thence onto the
wall. Since these points lay along the vertical axis in the area covered by the plaster o
later giornate no traces are evident.
There is one snapped rope line which does not relate to the curve of the vault directly
It extends from the upper edge of the abacus of the left ionic column laterally to the upper
edge of God the Father's halo (fig. 17). This line conforms to the radius of the outer cur
of the archway. But even so, it had no structural purpose for when it was made the arc
way had already been painted down to the inside edge of the intrados. It thus repeated
radius which was significant structurally only at an earlier moment in the painting of the
fresco. In all likelyhood this lateral formed part of a surface geometry (see ahead) whi
established the upper level of God the Father's location in the fresco.
There is also the problem of the indented points located in the fields of the recessed
left side of the right adjoining rib. From the junctures of this line with t
diagonals were extended crossing the coffer so that they terminated at
the interior coffer face was crossed by the rib above it. Obviously, th
into place when the coffer frame was already established. The purpos
was to fix the center of the rosette: at their point of intersection. It is si
crossing diagonals appear only once in the entire vault. Most likely,
to locate the rosettes by hand after this experiment. In the two coffers w
the former Masaccio abbreviated his system. He marked on both coffer
the inner coffer face by a point located on the edge of the adjoining
In the tenth giornata the quantity of observed assisting lines and points is reduced (fig.
18). Now the curving ribs are defined by just two lines marking their sides. Experimen-
tation with a string imitating a compass would show that the centers of the curving ribs
fall along a vertical shifted slightly to the right of the vertical axis used for drawing the
arcs of the curving ribs in the previous giornata. Like shifts in vertical axis can be ob-
served elsewhere in the fresco, for instance, as one moves from the archway (fourth gior-
nata) to the central rib of the vault (ninth giornata), or from it to the head of God the
Father (eleventh giornata). The plumb line which probably marked the vertical axis of
the fresco on the arriccio was only roughly followed on the successive
covered it.
Indented points of relevance are also to be observed in the tenth giornata. On the upper
edge of the curving rib connecting with the upper portion of God the Father's halo these
points locate the intersections with the orthogonal ribs. It seems curious why these should
have been fixed in the middle of the vault rather than at the extremities of the giornata.
Fig. 19. See fig. 1. Detail of vault painted during giornata 10 with rope impressions showing
Obviously, two points are necessary for snapping a rope line into place. Surely, the
vanishing point was not used as one of these points since its remoteness would have made
the procedure inconvenient. Besides, the scaffold on which the painter stood would have
been located between the vanishing point and the vault.
Interesting irregular rope marks are imprinted in relief on the intonaco of the vault
between God the Father's head and the ionic capital on the right side. It seems that the
artist's (or his assistant's) hand slipped when the lines for the sides of the third rib from
center were snapped into position. These lines were done over, one line to each side being
irregular, curving or tilting into the rib and then disappearing. Most probably the irre-
gular rope marks resulted from the whiplike action of a released taught line (fig. 19).
In this paper the scrutiny of the fresco is extended to those areas especially pertinent
for its perspective structure and the problem of the transfer from preparatory study to
wall. Presently, we move on to the left ionic capital situated at the rear of the vaulted
We now turn to the Virgin Mary, painted during the seventeenth and eighteenth gior-
nate. The body of Christ Crucified had been completed when Masaccio turned to the
lower area of the archway comprising the Virgin and John the Evangelist. Each figure
was done in two giornate which were on the whole symmetrically distributed. During the
first giornata was painted the head and closer arm (fig. 21), and the remainder of her
body was added later. These giornate extended beyond the figure of Mary comprising the
space between the cross and the left side of the arch. A feature of capital importance is the
quadratura of snapped rope lines which covers the Virgin's body. To be precise there are
two quadrature of which the more detailed covers the portion of her body painted in the
first giornata, excluding just the lower section of the closer arm and its broad open sleeve.
The two quadrature are related in such a way that each square in the lower grid is section-
ed in the upper finer grid into sixteen square parts.
Only the Virgin possesses a grid in Masaccio's fresco and there can have been only one
reason for its execution: to assist the precise transfer of the figure from the preparatory
9 In figure 5 the ionic capitals at the rear of the vaulted space are assigned to the same giornata. Of
course, they might have been done as well on different days.
drawing to the wall. The evidence strongly supports this assertion. The
to the area around it - even to the bottom of the archway since the gri
and-a-half centimeters above the upper step. The finer grid was laid
conforming generally to her head. The terminal points used for mak
clearly visible along the two side verticals. Additional indented points at
within the grid locate key features: points along the silhouette of he
especially a point at the corner of her right eye. One vertical is omitted fr
vertical which would have crossed her nose and mouth. Masaccio surel
her face clear of an excessive assisting line.
The larger grid spread over her main body was extended from the
it in a later giornata - except for her closer arm where one witnesses th
in the first giornata. The laterals were snapped into place from points
cals of which one crosses the Virgin's advanced foot and the other her righ
For why only the Virgin demonstrates a grid in Masaccio's fresco o
his dramatic concept in the context of the early Renaissance. Within th
tion of late medieval crucifixions the Virgin's appearance is revolution
wilt in grief as does Giotto's Virgin Mary in the Padua Crucifixion. In
erect: severe, impassive, her temporal connection to the Crucifix unc
in the direction of the beholder is general and unfocused; her gesture
fied Son is made for the sake of the beholder's instruction. She is clearly r
natural symbolic role: the embodiment of Mater Ecclesia. Her normal
have been particularly striking for an audience accustomed to her int
concern toward her supplicants: witness, for example, her hand extend
Scrovegni who offers her his chapel in Giotto's Paduan Last Judgeme
Masaccio's Virgin's "reach" transcends individual relationship. It is un
beyond the donors kneeling below her, unaware of their presence, to en
present and future, who represents the Community of Christians. Th
Christian is presented to the Throne of Grace.'o
10 For the symbolism of Masaccio's Holy Trinity fresco and particularly of the T
recently, Otto von Simson's article: "Ueber die Bedeutung von Masaccio's Trinitaetsfr
Berliner Museen, 1966, pp. 119-159.
Masaccio's Virgin is closely related to the Virgin on a Crucifixion from S. Giusto
hibited in the recent fresco exhibition in Prato (Due secoli di pittura murale a Prato.
sinopie e graffiti dei secoli ziv e zv, catalogue by G. Marchini, Prato, September-N
fig. 8). The fresco belongs around 1400 and seems related to Agnolo Gaddi. Both th
toward the beholder and hand gesturing toward the Crucified Christ, and Saint Jo
Christ in sorrow with this hands clasped before his chest, recall the respective figur
Trinity. It is interesting that another fresco from Prato in the same exhibition, a Vi
Enthroned from the Tabernacolo del Ceppo, given to Niccol6 Gerini, depicts an abs
Child standing on his mother's lap and grasping her veil in a way strikingly similar
Child on his S. Giovenale triptych in the Uffizi (photo: Soprintendenza alle Gallerie,
Marchini dates the fresco around 1591 (op. cit., p. 52, fig. 4). Regardless of the vast d
the connection of these frescos to Masaccio would indicate that Masaccio borrowed
his close predecessors- be they minor artists active in the neighborhood of Florence,
of the later trecento whom these minor masters would have imitated.
For Masaccio's relationship to the trecento see also M. Boskovitz in Zeitschrift fuer Kunstgeschichte,
Vol. XXIX, 1966, pp. 51-66.
11 The funerary character of the Holy Trinity is given by the connection of the donors with the
corpse of "Everyman" and the Throne of Grace. It remains uncertain, pending their satisfactory identi-
fication, whether they were acually alive or dead when the fresco was painted. John Pope-Hennessy has
observed that "initially the role of the Renaissance portrait was commemorative; it was consciously
directed to a future when the living would no longer be alive" (The Portrait in the Renaissance, New
York, 1966, p. 8). With the availability of death masks retrospective portraits of striking likeness would
have depended essentially on the artist' skill. Masaccio himself used the retrospective portrait when he
depicted Coluccio Salutati, who died in 1406, in the counselor seated below Theophilus in the Raising of
his Dead Son in the Brancacci Chapel (ibid., p. 7).
volutionary fresco. The Holy Trinity must have been bred and bo
"paper" in a situation of intense and sustained meditation, in a limited
lowed the artist to capture and project concepts in an initial stage of de
relevant that when Tintori stripped the lower portion of the fresco w
from the wall no traces of sinopie were uncovered.12
From the previous observations we must turn presently to the rationa
Masaccio's composition and space and relate our findings to those of o
these problems. These include primarily Kern's investigation of the pers
tion, written some fifty years ago,"3 and an interesting recent paper
which offers a scheme of proportions and measurements very tempting in
However, this logic is not quite as tight as Professor Janson's presentati
First we turn to the problem of dimensions. All dimensions here given
in situ more than once, unless otherwise commented.
A crucial fix on the fresco is the vanishing point. Kern located it a short
the step on which the donors kneel, which is situated about 180 centi
church floor.'" Considering the location to represent the normal eye lev
standing before the fresco, Janson places the vanishing point lower a
from the church floor. This level would put the vanishing point even with
"normal" quattrocento Florentine, smaller than his contemporary rela
the skeleton of "Everyman", 160 centimeters long, as the standard.16 H
servations bear out Kern's location.
Three participants and a rope were used to trace the paths of crucial orthogonals in
order to establish the area of their coming together. The orthogonals selected were the
fine axial rib lines snapped in with rope in the left half of the vault. The orthogonal ribs
of the vault were selected because they constitute the longest "depth" lines in the fresco.
Only the ribs in the left side of the vault were used because its construction preceded that
of the right side and seems more reliable, as has been stressed. Considering that these ortho-
gonals were probably transferred from a scale drawing the vanishing point - better: the
vanishing area - can be established with a surprising consistency in an area centering
close to five or six centimeters below the bottom step. Another vanishing point of un-
known manufacture can be observed on the modern wall (at this level the original sur-
face of the fresco is obliterated) at 8.5 centimeters below the bottom step, but it is too per-
fectly defined to sustain confidence. This point is still about 174 centimeters above the
church floor and considerably above Janson's. We conclude that "Everyman's" eye level
14 H. W. Janson, "Ground Plan and Elevation in MIasaccio's Trinity Fresco", Essays in the History of
Art presented to Rudolf Wittkower, London, 1967, pp. 85-88.
Janson's article offers important corrections to Kern's Measurements (see note 15).
15 Kern, op. cit., pp. 59, 45.
16 Janson, op. cit., p. 85
and the respective inner edges of the ribs touching on this coffer row. The results are inter-
esting. The coffer side comes to 28.5 centimeters, and the width of the rib to 11 centi-
meters. In the right half of the vault the lines extended involved the ribs bordering on the
second coffer row from the center. The lines chosen for extension were the inner edges of
the adjacent ribs and the furthest edge of the left rib. This time the coffer side came to
29 centimeters, and the width of the rib to 8.5 centimeters. The proximity of these coffer
sides to the half braccio is remarkable, and raises the possibility that Janson's theory
ought not to be completely discarded. Some irregularities in proportions might be ac-
counted for by lax transmissions of dimensions from cartoon to wall. But even an ex-
It stands to reason that Masaccio's determination to connect God the Father to the solid
ground determined in large measure the size and location of the box on whose projecting
lid He is standing. The level of God the Father's halo is determined, as has been seen, by
the diameter of the circle defining the intersection of the vault (if continued forward)
with the picture plane. His location and scale then determined in all likelyhood the height
of the box on which he stands. A discussion of the symbolism of this box, considered with
good reason as being the tomb of Christ,23 must take these factors affecting the shape of
the box into consideration. Whether this symbolism was intended from the start or
whether it evolved in the process of the formation of the composition will probably never
be known. In any case, it would support the essential funerary meaning of the fresco.
This fresco could well contain three tombs: below the Trinity that of "Everyman"; below
21 In a recent article Michael Mallory has stressed the close iconographic connection of Paolo di
Giovanni Fei's Holy Trinity - Crucifixion altarpiece in Naples Cathedral with Masaccio's fresco in S. Maria
Novella ("An early Quattrocento Trinity", Art Bulletin, Vol. XLVIII, 1966, pp. 88 ff.; see also M. Meiss,
Painting in Florence and Siena after the Black Death, Princeton Univ. Press, 1951, p. 55, n. 86; U. Schlegel,
in Art Bulletin, Vol. XLV, 1965, p. 25). I cannot accept Mallory's opinion in the light of the wholly
different formal and hieratic vocabulary of the Trinity by the Sienese painter which, different from Ma-
saccio's progressive realism, reverts to medieval hieratic and formal conventions.
22 See also Jacopo del Sellaio's Holy Trinity in a private collection in Munich (illustrated in Otto von
Simson, Ueber die Bedeutung von Masaccios Trinitaetsfresko", Jahrbuch der Berliner Museen, Vol. VIII,
1966, fig. 17 on p. 141).
23 See recently Janson, op. cit., p. 21.
Fig. 24. Pesellino, Holy Trinity, panel painting, Fig. 25. Master
National of London
Gallery, Flemalle,
Holy Trinity, panel painting,
Staedelsches Kunstinstitut,
Frankfurt
God the Father that of Christ; in back of God the Father in the rear niche another - that
of the donors?24 This multiplication of sarcophagi holding diverse categories of deceased
would have its parallels, albeit in simplified form, in trecento funerary monuments. In
24 It can be observed on figure I that the rear wall of the chapel is not flat, but opens into a niche
whose juncture with the rear wall is clearly shown. The curving extension of this niche is depicted in
form of changing chiaroscuro along the curving surface of the wall. This niche is indicated in cross
section on Sanpaolesi's figure opposite page 52 of his book on Brunelleschi (bibl. in note 19). The entire
lower portion of this niche is closed off by an oblong stone slab, cut off partially by the lid on which
God the Father is standing. This stone slab is decorated along the edge by a thin molded rim, and its
central portion is hidden by the lower body of God the Father. The combination of niche with transversal
slab recalls the funerary niches so widely used in the trecento, for instance, along the very precinct wall of
S. Maria Novella. The molding of the rim of this slab recalls the moldings on the sides of the sarcophagi set
inside these niches. Often the sides of such trecento sarcophagi are composed of a series of three square
or rectangular fields, and it is probable that Masaccio imitated them. This sarcophagus was intended to
hold a corpse. If God the Father stands on the tomb of Christ, then it was not Christ's. It is possible then
that it was the burial place of the donors. The assumption would add a significant dimension to the
fresco's iconography. Below the crucifix lies "Adam-Everyman". His corpse would represent the beginning
of death's rule which extends from the fall of man to the end of the world. Of course, the Crucifix
symbolizes Christ's victory over death and the redemption of mankind. Could this redemption be depicted
extending to the donors by way of the superposition of the Holy Trinity: the Throne of Grace - over
their tomb?
ering attention on the Divine Personages. The same vault which recedes convincingly
into distance projects God the Father and Christ in the direction of the beholder. The
orthogonal ribs of the vault receding toward the vanishing point are like rays spreading
outward from the Divine, and the curving ribs echo in ever ascending arcs the scene with-
vault's recession. The presence in giornata 9 of all axial rib lines (we recall that they were
discarded in giornata 10) indicates that the coffering was defined originally by a plain
grid adapted to the curve of the vault which these lines would document. Accordingly, it
can be observed that the vault terminates at the back of the room with a rib half the
normal width - that is, at an axial rib line. The ribs and coffers would have been added as
a second step. Of course, this process of development would relate to the preparatory study
and not the fresco. Just why these axial lines were transferred to the fresco is not clear.
Possibly, Masaccio might have automatically transferred structural lines of significance
in a preparatory study but no longer necessary unless he considered that they assisted in
the development of the perspective in the giornata.
To all appearances, the vault comprises seven transversal rows of coffers, of which the
one closest to the beholder is hidden in back of the arch frame cutting off its vision. This
impression is generally acceptable, but it remains to be sustained by detailed observation.
Indeed, an interesting detail is relevant. Along the vertical axis the visible portion of the
vault comprises exactly six rows of coffers. Is this mere coincidence or part of Masaccio's
calculated design?
Several alternatives can be proposed. Masaccio might have formed the arch frame first,
and then accomodated a series of six transversal coffer rows within the visible vault; or
Masaccio might have deducted the optical width of the intrados of the arch frame down
from its apex along the vertical axis and deployed seven rows of coffers over the remain-
ing surface of the vault (partially hidden) - in which case the extension over the visible
portion of the vault of precisely six rows of coffers would seem a strange coincidence; or
again he might have formed the vault inserted within the surface square (as previously
noted) as composed of a grid of eight by eight coffer bands, then adapting the arch frame
to cover the two nearest ones.
The last alternative has the advantage of offering the simplest perspective construction
(fig. 27). The surface geometry of the fresco in its initial phase offered the square into
which the vault was to be inserted. The diameters of the hemicircles forming the front
and rear of the vault lay conveniently along the lateral bisecting the square and its bottom
side. The lengths of the radii were given by the lateral distance from the respective
centers lying on the vertical axis to the orthogonals defining the sides of the vault, set
along lines connecting the midpoints of the vertical sides of the square to the vanishing
point below. The outer hemicircle was divided into eight equal segments, and from the
seven points defining them lines were drawn to the vanishing point, these being the axial
lines of the orthogonal ribs. The spacing of the eight curving coffer rows was also a simple
matter. On the extended diameter of the hemicircle closing the vault in the foreground
at its intersection with the picture plane a sequence of eight equal segments of reason-
able length are marked off starting at center (experimentation shows that their lengths
are not fixed). From the end point of this sequence a line is drawn to the horizon so that
this line passes through the center of the hemicircle closing the vault in depth. Lines are
then extended from the intersection of this diagonal with the horizon to
points defining the segments of the above sequence. The intersections of
the vertical axis locate the centers of the hemicircles forming the axial li
seven transversal ribs, the radii being the lateral distances from these
orthogonals defining the sides of the vault.
For this perspective structure the measured depth of the vaulted space
necessary. Masaccio surely tested the result in that it corresponded empi
crete spacial image - and this impression has born the test from Vasari
present.
Let us observe how this alternative corresponds to the evidence. The pr
located well below center, and on the rib crossed by the intrados of the arch frame this
axial line is most probably the line located but half a centimeter ab
the rib (fig. 16).30 It can be observed that the surface of this rib ab
overlapping intrados, three centimeters wide, is clear of lines (the d
the edge of the giornata). Measurements bear out this assertion. Th
of the coffer rows from the rear of the vault forward is as follo
previous dimensions are approximate since along the central verti
both axial rib lines are covered by the head and halo of God the Fat
centimeters. Measured from the approximate centers of the respect
visible coffer band would measure about 19.5 centimeters - involvin
of nearly 5 centimeters over the width of the adjacent coffer row. It f
nearest ribs were raised slightly with respect to their axial lines w
drawn first. This correction would have connected the nearest coff
the edge of the intrados which lies at the line of the giornata. It is poss
transposition made this correction necessary.
We now turn to the next problem: whether the available space corresp
of the two replaced coffer bands. This space must be measured fr
axial rib line, situated, as has been seen, half a centimeter above t
rib. The pertinent distance extending from this line to the ape
amounts to about 45.7 centimeters. This distance would accomodat
such coffer bands - say of about 20.7 and 25 centimeters - to be joi
panding in the sequence of 11.8; 12.1; 14; 15.8; 16.6; 18.5 centimete
The solution here proposed for how Masaccio formed the perspect
the advantage of simplicity of design. The construction of the vault
logically from the surface square into which it was inserted. This w
in the two other alternate solutions previously proposed since the ce
hemicircle of the vault would have to be located empirically. After t
of the vault was fixed Masaccio then elaborated the archway in fu
frame and the columns which separate the vaulted space from that o
and the beholder. We have observed that the front face of the arch frame is of the same
width as the column shafts at its juncture with the ionic capitals. At the apex the front
face gains two centimeters in width. All the fluctuations in measurements cannot be ac-
counted for. Possibly, the increased width of the face assisted in extending the archway
and its intrados over the area of the two coffer bands which they replaced.
In surveying the previous discussion we can propose some general assertions. Masaccio
was obviously deeply bound to Brunelleschi in the shaping of his architecture and in his
concern and ability in perspective construction. But it would seem exaggerated to consider
the Trinity a thorough study in perspective on the same order of Brunelleschi's studies of
the Piazza della Signoria or the Piazza di S. Giovanni.31
The perspective of the vault is successful in the eye of the beholder, and it was formed
30 The measurements here given are taken from a tracing of the assisting lines and marks evident on
the vault.
31 Antonio di Tuccio Manetti, Filippo Brunellesco, ed. H. Holtzinger, Stuttgart, 1887, pp. 9-15.
In some measure it can be observed how Masaccio transferred the composition from
model to wall. A spolvero was used for just one architectural ornamental frieze of minor
importance. For the transfer of architectural shapes the artist made use of cartoons in the
size of the giornate. Through these cartoons essential points were indented on the into-
naco. These points were then connected to form schemes of lines sufficient for the detailed
reproduction of the objects to be painted. Occasionally, these schemes of lines were am-
plified by details scratched on the intonaco. A grid was used, but exceptionally for the
transfer of just one figure, albeit a vital one: the Virgin Mary.
In the development of fresco painting during the Renaissance Masaccio's Holy Trinity
plays a vital role. This fresco initiates a new phase of technical requirements. Before its
time a sinopia could accomodate the artist's control over the desired final statement. But
with the Trinity the traditional sinopia lost a good measure of its value. In its composition
all parts, figural and ambiental, were united in determined relationships of real appear-
ances and measurable proportions. These had to be transposed from the study to the wall
faithfully. This service the sinopia could not render and it is no wonder that no sinopia
has been found beneath Masaccio's fresco. On the other hand, the comprehensive grid is
yet missing or was consciously shelved. It will be recalled how insistently Alberti advocates
its use for the transfer of compositions,32 and how it appears on Uccello's drawing in the
Uffizi for his fresco of John Hawkwood in the Cathedral of Florence (fig. 28). In the
Presentation in the Temple by the Prato Master in the Cathedral of that city the mechan-
ical process of the transfer of a complex composition from preliminary study to the wall
by means of quadratura is clearly evident: there the grid appears as well on the grezzo as
on the intonaco levels.33
Masaccio's Holy Trinity has impressed its realism upon centuries of criticism. The
fresco testifies to Masacciols ingenuity in developing a vaulted space which is the shrine
of a humanised Divinity and an archway which is the threshold of Renaissance art.34
32 Leon Battista Alberti, On Painting, J. R. Spencer, translator and editor, Yale University Press,
1966, pp. 68 f.
33 Giuseppe Rosi, who restored the Presentation in the Temple from Prato Cathedral, was very gener-
ous with information. The appearance on the arriccio and intonaco levels of identical quadrature is
mentioned by Giuseppe Marchini in the recent catalogue of the exhibition of frescos in Prato (biblio-
graphy in note 10, p. 18, figures on pp. 101, 105).
34 The writer extends his gratitude to the Harvard Institute of Renaissance Studies at Villa I Tatti,
to its director Myron Gilmore, and to Millard Meiss, without whose interest and support this paper would
not have materialized.
RESUMEE
Masaccios >>Trinitat<< in S. Maria Novella zu Florenz stellt nicht nur ein hervorrag
Strebens nach Naturwahrheit im friihen 15. Jahrhundert dar, sondern auch eine iibe
in der Entwicklung der Freskenmalerei. In diesem ersten Wandgemiilde der Renaissan
menschliche Figur und eine reiche, realistisch proportionierte wie auch tiefenriumlic
kiinstlerische Einheit bilden, hatte der Maler die entsprechenden Mittel erst zu erf
position von dem gewil3 kleinformatigen ersten Entwurf auf die Wand zu iibertrag
bestimmten Grd63enverhaltnisse und Details zu verandern.
Sorgfaltige Betrachtung der Oberflaiche des Freskos verrit, trotz vielfacher Besc
Kiinstler vorgegangen ist. Das Spolvero-System, d. h. die Verwendung des Pausverfah
Bildflaiche, so verbreitet es im spateren 15. Jahrhundert war, gibt es hier noch nich
nur in einem Detail an: bei der Gestaltung eines architektonischen Ornaments. Dass
Quadratura des ganzen Bildes, wie sie im spateren >>Tempelgang Mariae<< des Domes z
sie wird in der >Trinitat<< nur bei der Uibertragung der verkiirzten Muttergottes-Figu
Bei scharfer Seitenbeleuchtung erkennt man vielerlei Spuren an der Oberfliche, die
daBf Masaccio einen in entsprechende >>Giornate<< (Tagewerke) eingeteilten Karton
mui3ten wohl die Dimensionen und die vertikale Achse auf der Wand festgelegt we
wahrend der >Intonaco< (Feinputz) fuir die >Giornata<< noch feucht war, die Schliisse
indem man den Karton mit einem spitzen Werkzeug durchstach. Diese kleinen L6ch
wesentlichen Punkte und die Linien, die vorher durch Schniire angedeutet waren, f
auch die Mittelpunkte der Kreise zu finden, die fiir die Gestaltung der architekton
unerlfl3lich sind. Diese Kreise wurden dann mit einem Zirkel in den Feinputz einge
dienten als Grundlage fiir die architektonischen Formen wie Kapitelle, Friese, Siiulenge
Einzelheiten wurden hiufig freihindig in den Feinputz eingeritzt, so die gezackten Ri
bliitter an den Stiitzpfeilern, die Kapitelle oder die Kannelierung der Tondi. Masacci
wohl erfolgreich, erscheint deutlich selbst erfunden und beweist, daB die Technik der
von Kompositionen mit allen Details in der Florentiner Freskomalerei damals durch
iiblich war, obwohl man den >Spolvero<< (Pause) und die >Quadratura<< (Quadratnetz) k
Masaccios Tonnengew6lbe, dessen Perspektive di sotto in sit so iiberzeugend wirkt,
der linken Hiilfte, im Laufe von zwei >Giornate<< gemalt worden. Die erste >>Giorn
Linien der orthogonalen und der transversalen Rippen. Dies deutet darauf hin, daf
tierung auf der Grundlage eines Achsengitters entworfen wurde. Horst Janson hat
Wl61bung in ein Quadrat hineinpafBt, das die obere Halfte eines Hochrechtecks bildet
ebenfalls ein Quadrat ist. Der Rundbogen fiigt sich in seiner Breite in das obere Quad
punkt liegt in der Mitte der unteren Begrenzungslinie.
Masaccios perspektivischer Entwurf des Gew6lbes entstand innerhalb der Oberflii
perspektivisch verkiirzte Muster der Kassettierung konnte mittels einfacher Geometri
Masaccio benatigte weder einen TiefenmaBlstab fiir den gew6lbten Raum noch einen D
perspektivische Konstruktion war praktisch und wirkungsvoll. Die von Masaccio kon
fliiche besteht aus acht mal acht Kassettenreihen, von denen die zwei vordersten durc
mung und ihre Archivolte verdeckt werden.