Polity Revision
Polity Revision
Some provisions are came into force on Nov 26, 1949 itself.
The remaining provisions of the constitution came into force on Jan 26, 1950 (republic day)
Jan 26 : the day in 1930 PUrna Swaraj day was celebrated.
With the commencement of the constitution: Independence Act and Government of India act
are repealed.
Congress Party appointed an Experts committee for the purpose of preparing material for the
constituent assembly.
8 members are in the experts committee chaired by Jawaharlal Nehru. Significant members are
K.M.Munshi and Gopalaswami Ayyangar.
Alladi Krishnaswami Ayyar – “The Preamble to our constitution expresses what we had
thought or dreamt so long.”
K.M.Munshi – “horoscope of our sovereign democratic republic”
Thakur Das – “The preamble is the most precious part of the constitution”
M.Hidayatullah – “ American preamble resembles the declaration of independence, but
our preamble si more than a declaration and it is the soul of our constitution.”
Citizens are full members of the indian state and owe allegiance to it. They enjoy all civil and
political rights.
Aliens also divided into two types: friendly aliens and enemy aliens. Enemy aliens enjoyed lesser
rights than friendly aliens
Constitution confers following rights and privileges on the citizens:
Right against discrimination
Right to equality
Right to freedom
Cultural and educational rights
Right to vote in elections
Eligibility to hold certain public offices
Both a citizen by birth as well as a naturalized citizen are elegible for the office of
president in India.
Constitutional Provisions
only Initiated by the either house of the parliament not by the State legislature.
Can be introduced either by a minister or by a private member (does not need prior Permission)
Must be passed in each House by a special majority.
No provision for holding a joint sitting of the two houses.
If the bill seeks to amend the federal provisions, more than half of the state legislature approval
is needed. (Only simple Majority)
After duly passed by both the houses, the bill is presented to the president for assent.
The president must give assent to the bill (24th constitutional amendment act 1971)
After the president’s assent, the bill becomes an Act
Types of Amendments:
Fundamental rights
Directive Principles of state policy
All other provisions of the constitution which not covered by the first and third groups.
Jawaharlal Nehru – “there is no permanence in a constitution” (very rigid constitution stops the nation’s
growth)
The question whether Fundamental rights can be amended or not? By means of Art 368 –
Shankari Prasad case (1951) : question of constitutional validity of first amendment Act.
(curtailment of Property act)
Supreme court held the validity of the First amendment act: Art 13 means “law” only the
ordinary laws not constitutional amendment act
Golak Nath case (1967 – challenging the constitutional validity of 17th constitutional
amendment(1964) act (inserted the certain states act in the 9th schedule) ) : Supreme court
reversed its earlier stand. In that case, Supreme court ruled that the Fundamental rights are
given a transcendental and immutable position.
Parliament reacted to the supreme court’s judgement by enacting 24th amendment act(1971).
This act amended article 13 and article 368.
Parliament has the power to abridge or take away any of the fundamental rights under
article 368 and such an act will not be a law under the meaning of article 13.
Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) – Supreme court overruled its judgement in the Golak nath
case. It upheld the validity of 24th amendment act: “parliament is empowered to abridge or take
away any of the fundamental rights. At the same time, it laid down a new doctrine of the basic
structure of the constitution”.
But according to kesavananda bharati case statement, “art 368 does not enable it to alter the
basic structure of the constitution. “so it cannot take away the fundamental rights that forms
the Basic structure of the constitution.”
Indira Nehru Gandhi case(1975) : supreme court invalidated the provision of 39 th amendment
act (1975). The provision which kept the election disputes involving the prime minister and the
speaker of lok sabha outside the jurisdiction of all courts. “because its under the basic structure
of the constitution.
Again 42nd amendment act(1976): this act amended article 368 declared that there is no
limitation on the constituent power of parliament and no amendment can be questioned in any
court on any ground.
In the Minerva mills case (1980): Supreme Court invalidated this provision as it excluded the
judicial review, it is the basic feature of the constitution. Supreme Court held that, “the
constitution had conferred limited amending power on the Parliament the parliament cannot
under the exercise of that limited power enlarge that very power into an absolute power.”
In Waman Rao Case(1981): the supreme court adhered to the doctrine of the basic structure, it
would apply to constitutional amendments enacted after the april 24, 1973 (the date of
Judgement of Kesavandanda bharati case)
Elements of Basic Structure:
Successful Functioning of Indian federal system : not only depends on the harmonious
relations between centre and states but also between states.
I. Adjudication of inter-sate water disputes
II. Coordination through inter-stae councils
III. Mutual recognition of public acts, records and judicial proceedings
IV. Freedom of inter-state, commerce and intercourse. (in addition , the
zonal councils)
INTER-STATE WATER DISPUTES