PEREZ-LEED v4 For Building Design and Construction
PEREZ-LEED v4 For Building Design and Construction
PEREZ-LEED v4 For Building Design and Construction
Sustainable Sites
SSC2 Site Development due to its inability to protect or restore habitat, resulting in environmental degradation and loss of b
SSC3 for the Einstein building in an open space suggests a commitment to sustainable design, harnessing natural light an
SSC4 Einstein building don’t have any rainwater harvester
SSC5 Einstein building don’t have enough trees and plants reason for heat island
Water Efficiency
WEC3 recommend improvements in the cooling tower water use of the Einstein building to enhance sustainability and effici
WEC4 We have no information about the Water Metering in Einstein Building
Innovation
IC1 Einstein Building don’t have a score for innovation since it didn't meet the exceptional or innovative performance
Regional Priority
RPC1
RPC2
The Einstein building in Cabuyao Laguna may not have met LEED Regional Priority due to factors like insufficient
RPC3
issues with local regulations, budget constraints, or documentation shortcomings. Addressing the
RPC4
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the Einstein Building falls short of meeting several key criteria for LEED certification, indicating significant areas f
development to energy efficiency and indoor air quality, there are multiple aspects where enhancements are needed to align wi
services, incorporating better environmental considerations, enhancing transportation options, optimizing water use, reducing e
deficiencies will not only improve the building's sustainability but also contribute to its overall environmental responsibility and o
crucial for future projects seeking LEED certification in the area.
eria due to its lack of proximity to essential services, insufficient environmental considerations, poor walkability, inadequate mixed use deve
aim to preserve and safeguard ecologically or culturally significant areas from development impacts.
ecognizes buildings constructed on previously developed or undesirable locations that contribute to urban revitalization.
es, which requires a certain level of development density and a variety of nearby services and amenities to encourage sustainable land use
s proximity to multiple public transportation options, indicating it is not adequately served by nearby transit services, since public transportat
ion in bicycle lane
provision for alternative transportation options, insufficient use of parking space optimization strategies, or a lack of emphasis on reducing
E-bike as their transportation.
nhance sustainability and efficiency, aligning with LEED's focus on reducing environmental impact and promoting resource conservation.
D, potentially obstruct covering monitoring and optimization of energy usage, impacting sustainability goals.
nder LEED due to its poor measures for minimizing refrigerant leaks and managing refrigerants responsibly, compromising its environmen
or innovative performance
y due to factors like insufficient focus on local environmental concerns, limited integration of region-specific practices, compliance
shortcomings. Addressing these factors is essential for future projects seeking LEED certification in the region.
n, indicating significant areas for improvement in its sustainability and environmental performance. From location and site
ements are needed to align with LEED's principles and objectives. Recommendations include improving access to essential
timizing water use, reducing energy consumption, and implementing measures for better indoor air quality. Addressing these
ronmental responsibility and occupant well-being. Additionally, addressing regional priorities and local environmental concerns is
ty, inadequate mixed use development
lack of emphasis on reducing the overall environmental impact associated with parking facilities.
actices, compliance
on.