(PDF Download) E-Paper Displays Bo Ru Yang Fulll Chapter
(PDF Download) E-Paper Displays Bo Ru Yang Fulll Chapter
(PDF Download) E-Paper Displays Bo Ru Yang Fulll Chapter
https://ebookmass.com/product/e-paper-displays-bo-
ru-yang/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWLOAD NOW
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-facial-displays-of-leaders-
carl-senior/
https://ebookmass.com/product/comprehensive-geographic-
information-systems-bo-huang-editor/
https://ebookmass.com/product/introduction-to-flat-panel-
displays-2nd-edition-jiun-haw-lee/
https://ebookmass.com/product/comptia-linux-xk0-005-exam-cram-
william-bo-rothwell/
Fabrication of 3D interconnected porous MXene-based
PtNPs as highly efficient electrocatalysts for methanol
oxidation Qiang Zhang & Yuxuan Li & Ting Chen & Luyan
Li & Shuhua Shi & Cui Jin & Bo Yang & Shifeng Hou
https://ebookmass.com/product/fabrication-of-3d-interconnected-
porous-mxene-based-ptnps-as-highly-efficient-electrocatalysts-
for-methanol-oxidation-qiang-zhang-yuxuan-li-ting-chen-luyan-li-
shuhua-shi-cui-jin-bo-yang/
https://ebookmass.com/product/etabeta-la-matematica-per-tutti-
edizione-kmzero-3-gianfranco-bo/
https://ebookmass.com/product/multimaterial-3d-printing-
technology-jiquan-yang/
https://ebookmass.com/product/advanced-polyimide-materials-shi-
yong-yang/
https://ebookmass.com/product/china-and-global-governance-a-new-
leader-1st-edition-peng-bo/
E-Paper Displays
Wiley– SID Series in Display Technology
Series Editor: Dr. Ian Sage Fundamentals of Liquid Crystal Devices, Second Edition
Deng-Ke Yang and Shin-Tson Wu
Advisory Board: Paul Drzaic, Ioannis (John) Kymissis, Ray
Ma, Ian Underwood, Michael Wittek, Qun (Frank) Yan 3D Displays
Ernst Lueder
E-Paper Displays
Bo-Ru Yang (Ed.) Illumination, Color and Imaging: Evaluation and
Optimization of Visual Displays
Liquid Crystal Displays -Addressing Schemes and
P. Bodrogi, T. Q. Khan
Electro-Optical Effects, Third Edition
Ernst Lueder, Peter Knoll, and Seung Hee Lee Liquid Crystal Displays: Fundamental Physics and
Technology
Flexible Flat Panel Displays, Second Edition
Robert H. Chen
Darran R. Cairns, Dirk J. Broer, and Gregory P. Crawford
Transflective Liquid Crystal Displays
Amorphous Oxide Semiconductors: IGZO and Related
Zhibing Ge and Shin-Tson Wu
Materials for Display and Memory
Hideo Hosono, Hideya Kumomi LCD Backlights
Shunsuke Kobayashi, Shigeo Mikoshiba, and Sungkyoo
Introduction to Flat Panel Displays, Second Edition
Lim (Eds.)
Jiun-Haw Lee, I-Chun Cheng, Hong Hua, and
Shin-Tson Wu Mobile Displays: Technology and Applications
Achintya K. Bhowmik, Zili Li, and Philip Bos (Eds.)
Flat Panel Display Manufacturing
Jun Souk, Shinji Morozumi, Fang-Chen Luo, and Ion Bita Photoalignment of Liquid Crystalline Materials: Physics
and Applications
Physics and Technology of Crystalline Oxide
Vladimir G. Chigrinov, Vladimir M. Kozenkov, and
Semiconductor CAAC-IGZO: Application to Displays
Hoi-Sing Kwok
Shunpei Yamazaki, Tetsuo Tsutsui
Projection Displays, Second Edition
OLED Displays: Fundamentals and Applications,
Mathew S. Brennesholtz and Edward H. Stupp
Second Edition
Takatoshi Tsujimura Introduction to Microdisplays
David Armitage, Ian Underwood, and Shin-Tson Wu
Physics and Technology of Crystalline Oxide
Semiconductor CAAC-IGZO: Fundamentals Polarization Engineering for LCD Projection
Noboru Kimizuka, Shunpei Yamazaki Michael G. Robinson, Jianmin Chen, and Gary D. Sharp
Physics and Technology of Crystalline Oxide Digital Image Display: Algorithms and Implementation
Semiconductor CAAC-IGZO: Application to LSI Gheorghe Berbecel
Shunpei Yamazaki, Masahiro Fujita
Color Engineering: Achieving Device Independent Color
Interactive Displays: Natural Human-Interface Phil Green and Lindsay MacDonald (Eds.)
Techniques
Display Interfaces: Fundamentals and Standards
Achintya K. Bhowmik
Robert L. Myers
Addressing Techniques of Liquid Crystal Displays
Reflective Liquid Crystal Displays
Temkar N. Ruckmongathan
Shin-Tson Wu and Deng-Ke Yang
Modeling and Optimization of LCD Optical Performance
Display Systems: Design and Applications
Dmitry A. Yakovlev, Vladimir G. Chigrinov, and
Lindsay W. MacDonald and Anthony C. Lowe (Eds.)
Hoi-Sing Kwok
E-Paper Displays
Edited by
Bo-Ru Yang
State Key Lab of Opto-Electronic Materials & Technologies,
Guangdong Province Key Lab of Display Materials and Technologies,
School of Electronics and Information Technology,
Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
This edition first published 2022
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by
any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain
permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
The right of Bo-Ru Yang to be identified as the author of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered Offices
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial Office
The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some content that appears in standard print
versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
Contents
List of Contributors xi
Series Editor’s Foreword xiii
Editor’s Preface xv
Index 287
xi
List of Contributors
Norihisa Kobayashi
Anne Chiang
Graduate School of Engineering
Chiang Consulting,
Chiba University
Cupertino, USA
Japan
Vladimir Chigrinov Hoi-Sing Kwok
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Displays and State Key Laboratory of Advanced Displays and
Optoelectronics Technologies Optoelectronics Technologies
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Hong Kong S. A. R., China Hong Kong S. A. R., China
Paper is the medium which has dominated the presentation of both the written word and graphics for two thousand
years. The happy partnership of paper with printing was first developed in China before being adopted in the Western
world in the Middle Ages and it initiated the first information explosion. Perhaps no other invention has had such a
fundamental influence on the development of human society and way of life. Printed books and periodicals are attrac-
tive, affordable, and so familiar that we can truly pay attention to the contents alone, and overlook the qualities of the
physical page. With this cultural and technical background, it is not surprising that printed paper is widely regarded as
a reference point for electronic display technologies and since the introduction of the first flat panel displays, achieving
paper-like performance has been a common dream and aspiration of engineers. At the same time, users have bemoaned
the shortcomings of electronic displays and the poor reading experience offered by early generations of displays.
In the present volume, Professor Bo-Ru Yang has brought together an outstanding selection of authors to examine
the technologies which aspire to mimic the properties of printed paper. It is fair to say that no electronic display can
yet rival all the desirable characteristics of paper, and a basic question which arose at an early point in the planning
of the volume, was which technologies or aspects of performance should be included. Professor Yang and his team
have taken an inclusive approach. In this book the reader will find accounts of displays which offer different combi-
nations of desirable properties including paper-like appearance under ambient light, long-term image storage with
zero or ultra-low power consumption, light weight and flexibility, and the ability to accept user input with the ease
of pencil on paper. It follows that a wide range of display technologies are included, with an emphasis on device
modes which offer ambient light viewability. Several liquid crystal modes, both with and without polarizer, can pro-
vide image storage either intrinsic to the display or in ultra-low power drive electronics. Meanwhile, displays based
on electrophoretic or electrowetting effects can offer outstanding optical appearance under a wide range of ambient
lighting. Innovative and emerging displays are also considered, with a chapter on phase-change displays offering an
early view of the potential of this new development. Of course, physics of operation, the fabrication, engineering and
especially the addressing characteristics of each display mode can be very different, and these issues are comprehen-
sively covered, with special attention to those aspects of the devices which are less well covered in earlier sources.
Other, user-related properties of the devices—the difficulty of providing high quality reflective colour, and the rela-
tion of the display performance to human perception of image quality and metrology are carefully considered.
In the 21st century, our priorities regarding electronic displays have changed. Excellent optical performance is
today taken for granted while convenience, light weight and long battery life have increasingly driven user approval.
Especially, the environmental impact of every activity we undertake, now demands scrutiny. Printed media are major
consumers of environmental resources including energy, timber, carbon emissions and chemical residues while elec-
tronic devices have the potential to reduce or eliminate these problems—but only if they are responsibly manufac-
tured and accepted by users sufficiently to displace print over a long period of use and wide range of use cases.
Paper-like display quality can really make a difference to the world. The present book provides a comprehensive and
authoritative overview of the field, authored by leading experts on each aspect of the subject, and I believe it will offer
a most valuable source of reference to display professionals and advanced students, for many years to come.
Ian Sage
Malvern
xv
Editor’s Preface
With the advent of the Internet of Things (IoT), devices and objects around us are being equipped with built-in
sensors and electronics which allow them to analyse and share information in real time, in the manner we associ-
ate with intelligent organisms. It follows that vast numbers of devices will be fitted with displays to present the
information. The needs of such autonomous miniature devices mean that displays with low power consumption,
excellent sunlight readability, and geometrical conformability which are compatible with low-cost fabrication
methods, are becoming critical components in future IoT environments. E-paper displays have the inherent
advantages of reflective operation, zero-power bistability, and in many cases they can be fabricated by printing-
based processes. Therefore, they are regarded as among the most promising display technologies for these applica-
tions. Furthermore, many recent applications, such as fixed and mobile signage for transport, advertising
billboards, architectural coatings, wrapped vehicles, e-readers, retail labelling, dynamic artworks, and many oth-
ers, have started to exploit the unique advantages of E-paper.
Unlike LCD and OLED technologies, E-paper display technologies have not up until now been collectively and
comprehensively reviewed, and there has been no published source which can provide scientists, engineers, and
users with enough broad, insightful, and up-to-date knowledge to support research and development or product
integration in this field. To fill this need, the present book represents the achievement of a three-year collabora-
tion with prestigious scholars, experts, and entrepreneurs in E-paper display fields.
In this book, we have tried to cover as extensive a range of E-paper technologies as possible. Started with the
development history of electrophoretic displays, followed by the fundamental mechanisms, physical models,
driving waveforms, image processing, and advanced structures of electrophoretic displays, we describe the tech-
nological details and review the development progress to show how electrophoretic E-papers become commer-
cially successful. In addition, bistable and reflective LCDs for E-paper applications, including Cholesteric LC,
Zenithally Bistable Display (ZBD), Memory in Pixel (MIP), and Optically Rewritable (ORW) LCDs are also intro-
duced. After that, the emergent technologies such as electro-wetting, electro-chromic, and phase change materi-
als for E-paper display applications are reported and summarized. In the last part, the special needs for metrology
of E-paper displays are explained. This book covers the broad spectrum of state-of-the-art reflective and bistable
E-paper technologies, and we believe it will provide an invaluable handbook and reference for researchers,
advanced students, and professionals in this field.
1
1.1 Introduction
For over a thousand years, before the world of electronics, paper was the dominant medium for people to share
written and later printed information. People become familiar with paper at an early age, and there is an enor-
mous worldwide infrastructure for the production and distribution of printed material. Despite this huge built-in
advantage, paper and print now fall short in providing for many demands of modern life. The past few decades
have seen the emergence of electronic networks that transmit vast amounts of information, on-demand, for use
in various ways. Electronic displays are a necessary part of this infrastructure, converting bits to photons and
serving as the final stage of transmitting information to people.
Over the years, several electronic display technologies have waxed and waned; cathode ray tubes, plasma
displays, and super twisted nematic (STN) displays come to mind. A few technologies are dominant; backlit
active-matrix liquid crystal displays, active matrix organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays, and inexpensive,
passively addressed liquid crystal displays. Along the way, tens of different types of display technologies have been
invented and explored, but ultimately have failed to catch on. A few displays have found a home in niche products
and promise greater future application. Reflective displays, particularly electronic paper, are examples that have
managed to find a place in the display ecosystem, with unique applications best served by these technologies.
This book aims to update on some of the most exciting new areas in electronic paper technology. This introduc-
tory chapter focuses primarily on electrophoretic displays (EPDs) and how they became synonymous with elec-
tronic paper. The story starts in the early 1970’s, with the proposal and first demonstration of the electrophoretic
movement of charged particles to make an optical effect. After intense effort, the technology was mostly aban-
doned, only to be resurrected by a start-up company, E Ink. Several key, and rather improbable inventions had to
be made to develop a technology competitive to the dominant liquid crystal technology. Finally, the right applica-
tion and ecosystem, the Amazon Kindle electronic book, was necessary to cement commercial success.
The field of reflective displays is very rich. The many other chapters in this book and recent reviews [1, 2]
provide a wealth of resources for understanding the many technologies that have been developed in the quest to
achieve a paper-like display. In this chapter, we will examine the following:
●● A description of print-on-paper and how the optics of real paper compare with potential electronic paper
competitors.
Electronic paper has undoubtedly caught the imagination of the world. A Google search for electronic paper in
September 2021 returns over 12 billion hits. This interest reflects people’s love affair with paper as a medium for
transmitting information. Yet, it is easy to recognise that printing ink onto dead trees is not easily compatible with
today’s networked world. What are the attributes of print-on-paper that make it so important?
Nevertheless, physical paper cannot be instantly updated with information from electronic networks or easily
serve as an interface with electronic devices. Today’s backlit LCDs and OLED displays are ubiquitous as a means
of transmitting information, but with the limitations that emissive displays possess, including eyestrain and low
visibility in sunlight. Electronic paper can combine the power of electronic devices and networks with all the
attributes of paper.
So what strategies can be taken to enable electronic paper? It is instructive to understand the composition and
design of print-on-paper and see how many of these properties can be converted to something under electronic
control to compete with printed media.
Conventional, non-electronic paper consists of a mat of tightly pressed fibers, most commonly derived from
parchment or wood pulp. The combination of fibers and embedded air pockets scatter light and provide the reflec-
tive characteristics of paper. Historically, additives to the paper pulp during fabrication have also provided glossi-
ness, color, aid in manufacture, or other desirable characteristics (Figure 1.1).
Compared to a white optical standard, the perceived reflectivity of paper often ranges from 50–80%, but can be
even higher. The whiteness or brightness of paper depends on several factors, including the density of fibers,
the paper thickness, the presence of additives such as titanium dioxide, clays, or fluorescent agents, and whether
the viewing surface is made glossy through calendaring and coatings. The color of light reflected from white paper
may differ somewhat from a perfect reflector due to the fluorescing whiteners’ presence, or some underlying color
absorbance from the paper. The human eye readily accommodates for these changes, though, so the perception of
consistent color and lightness of a page relative to its surroundings is easily achieved (Figure 1.2).
Print-on-paper consists of drops of colored ink impregnated into the paper fiber. It is straightforward to devise
dyes and pigments that absorb red, green, or blue. To generate the color characteristics of print, the CMYK sub-
tractive color system can be used (Figure 1.3). The colors in print are usually comprised of cyan (absorb red),
magenta (absorb green), and yellow (absorb blue) (Figure 1.4). Black pigment (the K in CMYK) is also commonly
used, as it is challenging to achieve a neutral black color by mixing cyan, magenta, and yellow.
Figure 1.1 Arches 100% cotton rag paper. Scanning
electron microscope image @100×. Source: http://
paperproject.org [3] Used with permission of CJ Kazilek.
100
80
60
L*
40
50
20 0
–50
0
–100
–60 –40 –20 0 20 40 60 80 b*
a*
Figure 1.3 Color separation of an image into its CMYK components, and the final printed image. The absence of a color
is white.
4 1 The Rise, and Fall, and Rise of Electronic Paper
Figure 1.6 Printed color generation through printed CMYK halftones [5] / Slippens / Public Domain.
not change that much. Likewise, the amount of light scattered into the viewer’s eyes for a given spot on the paper
is also constant with viewing angle [8].
With this background, we can examine why designing an electronic display with the appearance of high-quality
print-on-paper is challenging.
1.5.1 Brightness
Electronic displays require a transparent front sheet as the top surface of the display. This top surface (usually plas-
tic or glass) provides a flat dielectric interface with air and degrades the optics of electronic paper in several ways.
●● A significant fraction (4–10%) of light is directly reflected off the display without interacting with the display
medium. This reflected light is seen as glare and degrades the contrast of the underlying display to the viewer.
This reflected light also reduces the available light scattered back to the viewer. Anti-reflective coatings can
reduce this reflected light, but with added cost and sometimes compromises in durability.
●● Even if there is perfect diffuse reflectance, a significant fraction of that light will be trapped by internal reflec-
tance at the display-air interface [9]. For an EPD where the dielectric phase is somewhere in the range of
1.38–1.45, the maximum amount of light that can be outcoupled from a white scattering layer, with no other
absorptive losses, is predicted to be no more than 65%. These incoming and outcoupling losses limit the poten-
tial brightness of an embedded Lambertian scatterer within an electronic paper display.
There are strategies to improve the luminance of scattering-based displays by incorporating focusing optical
elements with the display itself. Fleming et al. have demonstrated a display that uses a retroreflective prismatic
element within the display and a black electrophoretic colloid to control the reflection from this element [10, 11].
While the reflectivity of the micro prism layer will depend on the geometric details of the source illumination, in
many lighting conditions, the micro prism itself provides optical gain, and the display can appear “whiter than
white.”[12]. One display by Fleming et al., when illuminated by moderately collimated light, is reported to have
an apparent brightness over 80%, with a 20: 1 contrast ratio. Fleming will describe more information on these
types of displays in Chapter 4 of this volume. Further information about the metrology of measuring reflective
display and e-paper will be described in Chapter 12.
6 1 The Rise, and Fall, and Rise of Electronic Paper
Sealing layer
Figure 1.7 Color electrophoretic display using B/W particles and subpixel color filters [15] / John Wiely & Sons.
1.5 Translating Print-on-Paper into Electronic Pape 7
Figure 1.8 Eight primary colors of ACeP by different pigment arrangements [17] / John Wiely & Sons.
These driving waveforms are complex, and frame rates are currently slower than other EPD approaches.
Nevertheless, the multiple color particle design dramatically increases the color saturation and reflective lumi-
nance achievable compared to the color filter approach. Figure 1.9 compares the color performance of these two
types of color EPD prototypes [16, 17].
Many other inventive approaches have tackled the problem of making the electro-optical medium capable of
switching color. Controlled lateral migration of colored fluid and particles enables a bi-primary color system. This
design allows a single pixel to be changed through mixtures of color states [19].
A variety of other physical phenomena can be used to modulate reflected light electrically. The following table
describes several varieties of reflective displays that have been developed over the past several decades. The fact
that so many technologies have been pursued shows both the interest in the electronic paper and the difficulty in
achieving a paper-like display. We compare the various reflective display technologies in Table 1.1, showing the
strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches. More information on these different technologies can be
found in reviews [1, 2, 20] and other chapters in this book.
Figure 1.9 Prototypes of colored electrophoretic displays: the left image uses a color filter and front light, while the
middle and right images use the multiple color particles design [16–18] A. [18] Ian French, et al. 2020; B.[16] Hiji N, et.al,
2012 / John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; C.[17] Telfer S J, MD Mccreary, 2016 / John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Table 1.1 Summary of performance and other key factors for monochrome e-Paper technologies.
Reflect Zenithal
Electrophoretic Electrophoretic In-plane Electro Liquid Electro MEMs Cholesteric LCD w\ bistable
(commercial) (eTIR) EPD kinetic powder Electrochromic Electrowelting fluidic (IMOD) LC PDLC polarizer Flip dot device
White, 44% W [21] 60% [10] 75% [23] ∼62% 25 ∼ 30% 70% [30] 70% W [34] 72% W [37] 61% (Indoor) 40% [35] 50% W 42% W [43] 80% [45] 39% [48]
color %R [15] [28] 80% (Outdoor)
[40]
Black %R 3% [21] 4% [10] 3% [23] 2% 3 ∼ 4%[28] – 3–5% <3% [37] >3% [35] 5% [35] 5% 2% 6% 2% [48]
Contrast ∼15 : 1 [21] 15 : 1 [10] 23 : 1 [23] 30 : 1 8:1 38.1 : 1 [31] >35 : 1 [35] >30 : 1 [37] 15 : 1 8 : 1 [35] 10 : 1 >20 : 1 [43] 13.3 : 1 20 : 1 [48]
ratio
Lambertian Yes Partial [10] Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial Yes No Partial No Partial Yes Partial[48]
mono – Maybe Maybe SNAP – Maybe SNAP [34] SNAP SNAP – Maybe Maybe – –
SNAP/ SWOP [10] SWOP [23] SWOP [30] SNAP SNAP [43]
SWOP
Driving 15 2–4 [11] <10 ∼5 [26] 40–70 1.4 [31] 15 ∼ 20 10–20 5–10 (lab) < 4 5 ∼3 [43] 4 ∼ 125[46] 20
voltage (product)
25–40 [41]
Bistable Yes Yes [10] No No Yes Yes [32] Yes [34] Yes Yes Yes No (Yes Yes Yes yes
with
matrix)
Switching 100’s (33 fps) 33 [10] 15 (100 V) <300 <0.2 [29] <10 [33] 10 ∼4 [38] 0.01’s 300 51 [42] 48 [43] ∼66 [47] 20 ms
speed 30 (40 V) [27] (vertical) 5
(msec) [24] (in-
plane) [41]
Matrix AM AM [11] AM, PM AM PM PM AM AM, PM PM PM AM PM – AM [49]
drive
Greyscale Pulse Pulse [10] Analog/ Pulse Multi- – Analog/Partial Pulse Spatial/ Pulse Analog Halftone Pulse Analog [49]
approach Pulse write filling/Spatial Temporal
dithering [36]
Grayscale 4 4 [10] 5 >4 [27] 2 6 [30] 4 4 [39] 6 4 8 (60 Hz) 1 2 [44] 1 4 [49]
bit level (∼30) [25] (6 Hz) [42]
Neutral Yes – Yes Yes Yes Possible Yes Yes Yes No Yes Possible – Yes [48]
white point
Lifespan Good – Unproven Unproven Good/ltd. Ltd./unproven Unproven Unproven Good Good Good Great Commercial Good
Power None None [10] Very low Very low None Very low None [34] None Very None Low Moderate None Very low
(Static) low
Power Low Low [11] n/a n/a Low Very high High High High Moderate Moderate Low High Very low
(Video)
Years of Since 1969 [22] Reported Since Since Since Since 1989 [1] Since 2003 [1] Since Since 1997 Since In mid Since – Since
research 2018 [10] 2000 [1] 2009 [1] 2003 [1] 2009 [1] [1] 1994 [1] 1980s [1] 2001 [1] 1995 [48]
Maturity Many products Prototype [10] AM & PM AM demo ESL Smart card AM demo Segment PM PM AM Products Products Products
demo product/ products product products products prototypes
large PM
10 1 The Rise, and Fall, and Rise of Electronic Paper
●● Several e-paper technologies reach the reflective luminance of monochromatic SNAP (R ~ 60%), and a few of
them move toward SWOP (R ~ 76%).
●● The required driving voltages for many e-paper technologies are below 15 V, the maximum voltage provided by
mainstream active matrix backplanes. As we will describe in a later section of this chapter, active-matrix back-
plane compatibility is a significant practical advantage.
●● Many e-paper technologies have demonstrated a video speed response. However, it is important to note that
high-quality video reproduction requires accurate grayscale performance, and accurate color if present. Not all
technologies report this metric.
Later chapters in this book provide an up-to-date review of several essential e-paper technologies.
●● In Chapters 2 and 3, the fundamental mechanisms, physical models, driving waveforms, and image processing
of EPDs will be reviewed.
●● Chapter 4 describes the Clear Ink EPD with a total internal reflective structure, enhancing the display’s brightness.
●● Chapters 5 through 8 describe several different categories of reflective liquid crystal displays. Chapter 5 introduces
reflective displays based on cholesteric liquid crystals that rely on Bragg reflection from helical liquid crystal struc-
tures. Chapter 6 introduces the zenithal bistable display (ZBD), which utilizes a grating-type surface alignment
structure to achieve bistable reflective states. Chapter 7 introduces the memory-in-pixel (MIP) liquid crystal dis-
play technology, which realizes a bistable display by building a static memory circuit behind the reflective elec-
trode for each pixel. Chapter 8 introduces optically rewritable (ORW) technology, which uses a photoalignment
layer to control the orientation of the liquid crystals and spatially generate bright and dark reflective states.
●● Chapter 9 reviews electrowetting display technology, in which an applied voltage causes the physical transla-
tion of a dyed fluid within the pixel, with a resulting optical appearance change.
●● Chapter 10 discusses electrochromic technology, generating reversible color change through an electrochemi-
cal redox reaction.
●● Chapter 11 introduces the phase transition material technology. Under optical or electrical energy stimulation,
a phase change material cycles between amorphous and crystalline states with a resulting change in reflectivity.
●● Chapter 12 reviews the metrology of reflective displays, providing the means to characterize the performance of
different technologies.
It is fair to say that the electronic paper technology that has seen the greatest success in transitioning to high vol-
ume products is the microencapsulated EPD technology from E Ink Corporation. The next section of this chapter
will review the historical development of EPDs, including the many inventions and milestones needed to achieve a
competitive device. It took over 35 years to go from the initial concept, proposed by Xerox and Matsushita, to a suc-
cessful high-volume product, the Amazon Kindle. During this development period, many engineers and scientists’
insights and hard work developed a combination of technical achievements and manufacturing scale that could
enable competitive display products. Even with the baseline technology resolved, it still took the right product con-
cept ready at the right time to lead to the commercial success of the Amazon Kindle. There are lessons to learn from
observing how a laboratory curiosity was transformed into a technology and product that opened up a new industry.
The idea of a personal electronic device allowing user input and a display output screen is widely attributed to
work done in the late 1960’s by Alan Kay of Xerox PARC. Kay coined the term DynaBook for the apparatus [50].
He also laid out many of the characteristics of the device, including that the visual output should be, at the very
1.7 The Evolution of Electrophoretic Display-Based Electronic Pape 11
least, of higher quality than what can be obtained from newsprint. While electronic paper was not explicitly called
out as a display medium, that analogy to newsprint is a natural precursor for an electronic book. Nevertheless,
until the late 2000’s, liquid crystal displays dominated all implementations of personal electronic devices.
Why did it take so long to develop attractive electronic paper products? One overwhelming factor is the success
of the liquid crystal display. LCD technologies started development about the same time as EPDs, and one suc-
cessful variant (the super twisted nematic, STN) LCD did not appear until over ten years later. Reflective LCDs’
suffered from poor brightness, poor contrast, and poor viewing angle characteristics. Nevertheless, LCDs can be
matrix addressed to enable high pixel count, have reasonable response time, and be used in transmissive mode.
LCDs were seen as “good enough” for many early applications. With volume production came incremental
improvements in performance, reliability, and cost year-by-year. For a new electronic paper technology to take
hold, it must outperform LCDs in multiple aspects and have an application important enough to attract invest-
ment in manufacturing at scale. For decades, no reflective display technology seriously challenged LCDs.
Despite the wide-ranging descriptions, no actual working embodiments were described. There does not appear to
be any public record of immediate follow-up work by Evans or his coworkers. EPDs did become an important area
of development by others at Xerox in the late 1970’s, under a different group of researchers and engineers.
Nearly contemporaneously, Ota of the Matsushita Corporation applied for a patent in 1970 (granted in 1972) for
an EPD Device [54]. Many of the same concepts described by Evans were disclosed in that patent. Ota also
described an embodiment where the electrophoretic fluid was separated into distinct compartments within the
display. Compartmentalizing the electrophoretic fluid foreshadowed a critical development area 25 years into the
future when the electrophoretic fluid across the display would be separated into tiny, active microcapsules for
improved stability.
In 1973, Ota et al. published the first peer-reviewed article on EPDs [55]. This paper disclosed specific examples
of the electrophoretic medium and display construction and showed photographs of digital clocks with seven-
segment display digits. These were the first public examples of working EPDs.
12 1 The Rise, and Fall, and Rise of Electronic Paper
In the early 1970’s, commercial electronic displays typically meant emissive displays such as cathode ray tubes,
vacuum fluorescent displays, or Nixie tubes. There was a growing need for low-power reflective displays in con-
sumer devices, but these technologies were still under development and not yet widely used. A 1975 paper by
Goodman of RCA Laboratories [56] described the landscape for low power reflective displays: liquid crystals
(dynamic scattering and twisted nematic type), electrophoretic, and electrochromic. A wide range of properties
was compared within the paper. However, the paper acknowledged that all these technologies were still at an
early stage of development with unknown future potential.
An advantage of LCDs is that they could be matrix addressed to enable 48-line displays, whereas the other tech-
nologies could not. If the application required more than a limited number of pixels, then LCDs were the only
choice at that time. The paper concluded that “Although (none of the three display types) are yet not suitable for
matrix address video displays, LCDs, ECDs, and EPIDs are potentially useful in those applications where low power
consumption is important, and matrix address of a large number of elements is not important.” LCDs were being
used in “watches, calculators, and panel displays.” Still, “Primarily because of the somewhat limited viewability of
LCDS, ECDs, and EPIDS are being investigated for utilization. . . .” EPDs suffered from poor reliability and the need
for high operating voltages, but the race was on to overcome these difficulties and supplant low visual-quality LCDs.
The 1970’s and early 1980’s were a period of intense development in EPDs. Multiple companies developed the
technology, including Matsushita, Xerox, Philips, Plessey, EPID Inc., Thomson-CSF, Seiko Epson, Exxon, and
Copytele. It is instructive to describe what was and what was not accomplished by these pioneering companies.
During this period, the development focus was primarily on single color electrophoretic pigments suspended in a
contrasting fluid. Many papers described progress on the electrophoretic suspension and in controlling the switching
and memory characteristics of the panel. Some highlights in the technology development are described as follows.
●● 38 μm cell gap, comprising polymer-coated titania in a diethyl phthalate solution of Sudan Black
●● Drive voltage of 15 V
●● one second switching time
●● Erase/conditioning voltage of 30 V for one second required before addressing
●● 1 μA/cm2 drive current
●● Memory of weeks
Lewis et al. also provided a physics-based analysis for reversible display memory based on the competition of
van der Waals attraction and electrostatic repulsion between two particles within the electrical double layer. While
this model provided some qualitative guidance, the authors recognized that the complex multi-component
composition found in actual displays was beyond the scope of a simple analysis. The authors postulate that steric
1.8 Initial Wave of Electrophoretic Display Developmen 13
stabilization by modification of the particle surface could be a helpful approach, which was an important area of
future development by many companies.
A 1978 paper by Murau and Singer provided additional insight into the physics behind electrophoretic device
stability and memory functions [58]. This paper described a further theoretical framework for particle attractions
and repulsions. It also provided dynamic electrical measurements of working displays that demonstrated the
complex behavior of multiple charge carriers with different mobilities. They claimed that properly stabilized sus-
pensions could achieve over 250 000 000 switches without severe degradation.
Croucher and Hair later provided an additional detailed description of desirable properties for the electrophoretic
fluid, along with examples for many categories [59]. They examined several aspects of dispersion stability, including
the tendency of different suspensions to settle (gravity-induced sedimentation), the tendency toward flocculation,
and the ease of redispersion of the particles with time. They concluded that steric stabilization of the pigment parti-
cles is essential, and described the characteristics of polymers for stable physisorption onto the particles. They also
speculated on potential advances, such as chemisorption (chemical attachment) of the stabilizing polymers onto the
pigment, and demonstrated the potential of charge control characteristics into the steric stabilizer.
Novotny and Hopper published an analysis of the electro-optical characteristics of an EPD device [60]. The
paper described a model where the device’s memory characteristics relied on particle-electrode and particle-
particle attraction, and observed devices with memories on the order of many hours. They concluded that the
wide distribution of such forces would work against the appearance of a voltage threshold for switching.
The lack of a voltage threshold was a major drawback for EPDs, as it reduced the ability of the device to use
simple row and column electrodes (passive addressing) to enable displays with a large number of pixels. Other
approaches toward enabling x-y addressing are described later in this chapter, but the problem wasn’t truly solved
until the active matrix addressing became practical in the early 2000’s.
electrophoretic particles, the control grid could provide an additional potential to either enhance or diminish the
effective voltage between the top and bottom electrodes. Dalisa et al. claimed that the device demonstrated 5 ms
switching per line at ±15 V and a resolution of 5 lines/mm. While the paper contended that further improvements
could be made, the dimensions of the control grid and added complexity would limit this approach to low or medium-
resolution displays.
Hopper and Novotny published two papers in 1979 that provided detailed descriptions of some EPD systems
and treated important topics such as response times, memory, and device addressing [63, 64].
●● These papers described device dynamic and optical trade-offs with cell thickness, electric field, particle concen-
tration, and other formulation variables. They noted a complex electrical transient behavior due to the contribu-
tions of the many charged components present in the electrophoretic fluid.
●● Similar to Ota, the papers described a hypothesis where the device’s memory characteristics relied on particle-
electrode and particle-particle attraction and observed devices with memories on the order of many hours. They
concluded that the wide distribution of such forces would work against the appearance of a voltage threshold
for switching. The device switching was dependent on the voltage history of the device. No other physical
mechanisms regarding the memory effect were provided, though.
●● Hopper and Novotny recognized that passive addressing of EPDs to achieve high pixel count displays was not
likely. They noted that thin-film transistor (TFT) active-matrix addressing was possible, though the capability to
fabricate useful TFT backplanes was not very developed.
●● Hopper and Novotny noted that particle migration and settling where serious problems in EPD displays. Along
with Harbor, they used a public invention disclosure to propose that subdividing the EPD panel into subdivisions
could potentially resolve this issue [65]. As will be noted later, subdivided EPD panels were reported in 1986, and
the microencapsulated EPDs described later in this chapter provided the ultimate segregation for particles.
Murau and Singer published a detailed study examining the mechanisms behind various factors leading to insta-
bility in electrophoretic panels [58]. They attributed the steric repulsion due to adsorbed polymers and modeled the
balance between these repulsive forces between particles with the electric fields that induce tight packing of parti-
cles at the electrode surface. They also described two interesting phenomena that degraded display reliability:
●● Particles undergoing vertical switching can migrate laterally outside of the electrode area and then become
effectively stuck in field-free regions.
●● Electrohydrodynamic fluid instabilities caused by slow-moving background changes in the suspension, leading
to undesirable particle clustering
By carefully optimizing several aspects of the electrophoretic fluid, Murau and Singer were able to demonstrate a
device that was switched over 2.5 × 108 times without serious degradation.
1.8.3 Optics
While the white TiO2 pigment is similar to the pigments used in white paint, there are multiple aspects of the EPD
that significantly reduce the reflectivity of a display compared to white paint. The reflectivity of a white pigment
below a clear, dielectric surface will be reduced due to refraction and total internal reflection within the device
and the reduction of illuminating light reflected from the display surface. An EPD device containing a dyed fluid,
there will be additional losses due to residual colored dye in the fluid above the electrophoretic particles, even in
the bright state. Reducing the dye concentration improved brightness, but at the cost of contrast due to reduced
hiding of the white pigments in the dark state (Figures 1.10 and 1.11).
One of the first analyses of this interplay between brightness and contrast was provided by Vance [66]. Vance
modeled the reflectivity of TiO2 pigment suspended in a dielectric fluid medium without dye to estimate the upper
limit to reflectivity. He then analyzed experimentally the potential contrast for different dye concentrations and
1.8 Initial Wave of Electrophoretic Display Developmen 15
1.0
Device reflectance, Rm
74%
d = 250μ
0.5 d = 125μ
d = 50μ
d = 25μ
0
0 10 20 30
Contrast ratio
Figure 1.10 Device reflectance vs contrast ratio for EPD at different device thicknesses. From Vance 1977 [66].
Figure 1.11 First EPD product for point-of-purchase (POP) use, and the experimental numeral display EPD [70] / U.S
Patents / Public Domain.
cell thickness and the impact on bright state reflectivity. (Figure 1.12) shows the relationship predicted between
device reflectance and contrast ratio at different cell thicknesses and dye concentrations. Realizing that significant
cell gaps will result in unacceptably high voltages and slow response times, for a 25 μm cell thickness, he esti-
mated that an ideal device could achieve brightness between 35% and40% for a contrast ratio between 5 and 10.
However, this estimate assumed that the electrophoretic medium contained a particle concentration of 10% or
higher, which was considered unrealistic for a stable device.
Fitzhenry-Ritz published a similar analysis in 1981, examining the combinations of yellow pigment/red dye and
green pigment/black dye from both a simulation and experimental perspective [67]. While her results were com-
plicated by using color-contrasting states, the results were similar to Vance in that it did not seem possible to
achieve true paper-like brightness and contrast with EPD systems.
Vance states, “It thus appears unlikely that displays with the contrast (10:1) and reflectivity (>70%) of black and
white printed pages can be produced by these systems. Rather, as has been universally observed, practical ‘black and
16 1 The Rise, and Fall, and Rise of Electronic Paper
●● Chiang described a 1 in2 32 × 32 display addressed using only a passive x-y addressing scheme, enabled by a
“packing pulse” followed by complex 2/1 or 3/1 selection Schemes [72].
●● Chiang also reported a stylus-addressed EPD in 1979, which finessed the x-y addressing limitations by enabling
the user to write an image using a charged stylus [73].
●● Shiffman and Parker reported in 1984 an EPD display driven by NMOS circuitry on single-crystal silicon. This
first demonstration was limited to 16 × 16 pixels on a 4 × 4 mm display area, with peripheral circuitry filling the
6 mm wafer [74].
●● Beilin and coworkers reported in 1986 a 9″ diagonal 2000-character (8 × 8 pixels each) EPD display using control
grid technology. The display employed honeycomb grid compartments to segregate the electrophoretic material
into single pixels, claiming that five years of a lifetime is feasible. Interestingly, they reported that they improved
the particle stability by chemically grafting the stabilizing polymers to the particle surface and several proprietary
charging agents and stabilizers. The device was reported to have a reflectance of 13% with a 9: 1 contrast ratio [75].
●● Chiang reported the first active matrix-driven EPD panels in 1980 [76-78]. The varistor comprised back-to-back
ZnO diodes, the panel incorporated pixel-level storage capacitors and enabled a display with 32 × 32 pixels and
an area of 1 in2. Switching voltages were reported as 70 V, with image switching times of either 16 ms (blue to
white) or 11 ms (white to blue). Importantly, the paper also reported that the images were written line-at-a-time,
at 20 μs/line without crosstalk, flickering, or refreshing with the incorporation of local storage capacitors. This
capability is unique to bistable reflective displays.
Despite these advances, for over 10 years, there was little activity in the development of electrophoretic technol-
ogy. EPDs had developed the reputation as not viable for primary display application.i
The controversial company Copytele, founded in 1983, filed and was granted several patents in EPD technology.
While raising millions of dollars from investors and claiming to develop displays for data and graphics, a report in
1992 indicated no evidence of any successful commercialization [79].
Nippon Mektron, in a 1994 paper, reported a 5 × 7 direct drive display aiming for large-area applications [111].
The drive electronics were bonded directly to the backplane on a printed circuit board. More importantly, this
paper demonstrated that EPD switching times could be fast (1.7 ms frame rate) and reliable (with over one 20 mil-
lion switching cycles with only minor performance loss, and the equivalent of five years exposure to sunlight).
Still, the contrast ratio was modest (4 : 1).
By the late 1990’s several pieces of the puzzle started coming together.
●● There was little progress in improving the optical appearance of reflective LCDs. If people wanted high-quality,
bright images on a portable electronic device, then backlit LCDs were required, with the usual limitations for
emissive displays compared to paper.
●● While several other technologies were investigated for reflective displays that could potentially be considered a
rival for paper, none met with any commercial success.
●● The steady growth of the LCD display marketplace led to a significant investment in TFT panel manufacturing
plants. While TFT panels for LCDs were not optimized for EPDs, they potentially could solve the pixel address-
ing a problem that plagued early versions of EPDs.
EPDs did see a revival in the 1990’s, with the introduction of microencapsulated EPDs. In a paper published in the
journal Nature, Comiskey et al. from MIT demonstrated that it is possible to create an EPD by microencapsulating
i The reputation for EPD displays remained poor into the late 1990s. One of this chapter’s authors (PSD) was introduced to display
technology luminary Sir Cyril Hilsum at an SID event in 1998. When Hilsum learned that he was planning to join a new start-up
company (E Ink) as Director of Technology to work on EPDs, Hilsum’s response was “I’m so sorry.”
18 1 The Rise, and Fall, and Rise of Electronic Paper
Despite this early entry, further activity at NOK on the technology seems limited. There appears to be only one
additional publication by that company, in 1999, using a flexible sheet of microencapsulated electrophoretic mate-
rial with the photoconductive drum of a laser printer to form a rewritable flexible paper.
There are also several Japanese patents on microencapsulated EPDs filed in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s by
Nippon Mektron Corporation, with the earliest appearing in 1987 [83]. Nevertheless, there are no technical pub-
lications in this area until the NOK 1998 paper, and no technical papers afterward. For the balance of this chapter,
we will focus on developing EPDs at E Ink Corporation and collaborators.
The startup company E Ink Corporation was founded in 1997 to commercialize “electronic ink” based on the MIT
technology, and set up shop in Cambridge, MA. Professor Joseph Jacobson first drew attention to the concept in a
1997 publication aptly titled “The Last Book.” [84]. In 1998, the company received significant publicity, including
being named one of Fortune Magazines 30 Cool Companies of 1998. The company also secured US$15.8 M in
1.11 Enhancing Brightness and Contras 19
venture and industrial funding by mid-1998, backed by the Hearst Corporation, Motorola, and others [85].
The venture capital model expected that E Ink would develop products that would enable the company to scale
rapidly, supplying products in high-volume markets such as publishing and advertising.
Much of the interest was driven by the vision of radio paper. In a 2000 interview, Jacobson described radio paper
as “electronic paper, coated with e-ink, with tiny transistors in it to act as electrodes, solar cells, and radio receivers.”
The paper “would be able to upload pretty much anything, even video, using no more energy than it draws from ambi-
ent light.” “I fundamentally think five years is the right time scale for the static paper to be phased out and replaced
by radio paper’ Jacobson says.” [86].
While the microencapsulated technology seemed promising, there was a long way to go to achieve any com-
mercial product, let alone “radio paper.” Issues to overcome included:
●● Contrast and brightness were not better than reflective LCDs and certainly inferior to backlit LCDs.
●● The operating voltage was high. ±90 V switching is not compatible with high-resolution devices
●● The displays could not be passively addressed. Options were either direct drive (for low pixel count displays) or,
in principle, active-matrix backplanes (for high pixel count/high resolution) displays. At that time, TFT panels
were expensive, hard to source, and not designed for the switching characteristics needed for EPDs.
●● No scalable manufacturing method was demonstrated.
●● Reproducibility and reliability not demonstrated
The vision of “radio paper” was compelling but incredibly challenging. Remarkably, the engineers at E Ink and
their collaborators managed to make multiple inventions, overcome these limitations, and develop a competitive
display technology that, while not quite “radio paper,” still met a market need in a compelling way. The following
sections describe many of the key achievements to developing a practical display suitable for use in high-volume
electronic paper products, up to the introduction of the Amazon Kindle.
The expectation that electronic paper would look like print on paper requires a display with reasonable brightness
and contrast. As mentioned previously in this chapter, for EPDs using titanium dioxide dispersed in a dyed fluid,
Fitzhenry-Ritz pointed out a tradeoff in dye concentration, display brightness, and display contrast [67]. Using
titanium dioxide in a dyed fluid, the microencapsulated EPD E Ink display exhibited a brightness of 12% and a
contrast ratio of 6 : 1, well under the theoretical maxima predicted for EPD displays. While brightness and con-
trast ratio could be traded off by adjusting dye concentration, there was no expectation that a brightness >40%
with good contrast could be achieved in this system.
A way out of this dilemma would be implementing a two-particle system with white and black pigments. If one
color of the colloid could be brought to cover the top surface of the microcapsule, with the other color hiding
behind this layer, then higher brightness and contrast could be achieved. The challenge is that while previous
papers and patents had disclosed the concept of such two-particle systems, there is little indication that such a
system was reduced to practice. There are significant challenges to such an implementation:
●● There are two types of particles needed to possess opposite charges to respond to the applied field properly. Such
opposite charges would attract, so that irreversible particle flocculation was a serious issue.
●● The electrophoretic mobilities of the particles would need to be made stable, and any charging agents within
the fluid compatible with both types of particles.
●● This two-particle system would need to be compatible with the microencapsulation process.
Honeyman and coworkers developed a means of grafting polymers onto the colloid surface, which achieved these
goals [87]. They first attached a polymerizable or polymerization-initiating group to the particle, then reacted with
20 1 The Rise, and Fall, and Rise of Electronic Paper
one or more polymerizable species. These secondary polymers could comprise branched polymer chains, which
would present a barrier retarding the flocculation of oppositely-charged particles. These polymers could also
incorporate charged or chargeable groups. Since the polymers were chemically bonded to the particle surface,
they would be much more stable over time previous methods of merely physabsorbing polymers onto a surface.
Achieving a two-particle system resulted in a dramatic increase in display brightness compared to the single-
particle/dye system. As described in the following section, carefully engineered microcapsules were equally
important in improving device optics.
1.12 Microencapsulation Breakthrough
While the microcapsules used by E Ink promised to resolve many of the instabilities found in conventional EPD
displays, they introduced another problem regarding reduced contrast and high switching voltages. The following
Figures 1.14–1.16 can be used to understand the source of these issues [80]:
200 μm
200 μm
Figure 1.15 Microphotograph of Microcapsules in white state. From SID 1997 Digest paper [112].
1.13 Image Retentio 21
Figure 1.16 Largest capsules are on the order of 100 μm. From 1998 Digest paper [80] Drzaic P, et.al, 1998 / John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
●● There is a wide distribution of microcapsule sizes. Since the particles are rigid, they tend to layer on top of each
other, increasing the cell gap across the film. This increased cell gap raises the total voltage required to switch.
●● The rigid particles do not close pack. There are large gaps between microcapsules in which no switching occurs.
These optically “dead” areas do not switch between light or dark states and degrade brightness and contrast.
●● The distribution of the electrophoretic particles within the microcapsule is not uniform. Particularly in the dark
state, the centers of the microcapsules showed larger optical contrast than the edges, which did not switch to
the same degree.
Loxley and colleagues deftly resolved many of these issues by introducing microencapsulation chemistries to
make the microcapsule walls compliant and developing a coating formulation to deposit a monolayer of capsules
in an aqueous binder [89]. As the coating dried, surface tension pulled the microcapsules together. The compliant
sidewalls enable the microcapsules to close pack, with minimal gaps between capsules. Additionally, the sidewalls
between neighboring capsules take on a more vertical profile, which minimizes any curvature-induced packing
issues in the microcapsules.
Figure 1.17 shows a schematic-view of the close packed capsules in a complete display. Figure 1.18 shows a top
view of the microcapsules, with each square spaced at 200 ppi (127 μm on a side). Switching voltages of ±15 V
became much more compatible with active-matrix backplanes [90].
The photograph also illustrates another key feature of this formulation. The size of the microcapsules does not
directly define the achievable resolution of the display. It is seen that with a given microcapsule, part of the micro-
capsule can be switched dark, and the remaining part light, depending on the field applied by adjacent electrodes.
As such, high-resolution images can be rendered.
1.13 Image Retention
One of the potential advantages of microencapsulated EPD systems is that the display’s image can be retained for
long periods. While this phenomenon had been noted in the early EPD work, the controlling factors were not fully
understood. Sedimentation due to gravity was recognized as a cause of images fading over time, particularly
severe in high-density particles such as titanium dioxide. Coating the particles with polymer could reduce their
density somewhat.
22 1 The Rise, and Fall, and Rise of Electronic Paper
(–) Black
Pigment PET
ITO
Ink
Layer
Adhesive
Rear
Electrode
As mentioned previously, Ota and Novotny and Hopper’s publications attributed memory effects to van der
Waals and electrostatic attractive force between the pigment particles and the electrode. In principle, the particle
surfaces could be modified to enable sufficient attractive forces to counteract sedimentation forces. Still, the real-
ity is that it is challenging to alter the particles to weakly and reversibly flocculate this way. In a two-particle sys-
tem, the problems become even more serious.
Webber developed stable and reversible image stability for two particle systems [91]. Webber discovered that
adding an oil-soluble high molecular weight polymer (>20 000) to the electrophoretic fluid can dramatically
increase image stability without increasing the fluid viscosity. If the polymer is non-absorbing onto the particle
surfaces, the well-known phenomenon of depletion flocculation will create osmostic pressure between the parti-
cles and induce soft flocculation [92]. Webber demonstrated image stability of 106 seconds in a black and white
system (Figure 1.19).
1.14 Active-Matrix Compatibilit 23
w->g
50
L*
b->g
g->g
35
w->b
20
10–2 10–1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106
t (s)
1.14 Active-Matrix Compatibility
High-resolution images for EPDs require an active matrix backplane for addressing. Moreover, to fulfill the vision
of “radio paper,” it seemed important that the active matrix backplane was scalable, flexible, and ultimately print-
able. Fortunately, silicon-based TFT arrays were becoming available, and new flexible and printable technologies
were on the horizon.
The first achievement of a silicon TFT, matrix-addressed EPD, was made in late 1999. Bob Wisnieff of IBM
provided to E Ink some active-matrix panels designed for use in LCDs that would likely be compatible with the
EPD material. This initial demonstration led to a successful collaboration with IBM, resulting in a 2001 report of
active-matrix driven EPDs with high pixel counts.ii Just as importantly, these prototypes demonstrated compati-
bility with technology already being deployed in the massive liquid crystal display industry [93].
In 2001 the engineers at E Ink further demonstrated microencapsulated EPD display driven by two other flexi-
ble active-matrix panels.
●● Using facilities at Princeton University, Chen designed and fabricated an a-Si TFT array on a flexible stainless
steel backplane. The resulting display is the first example of a flexible a-Si microencapsulated EPD array [94].
●● In collaboration with Lucent/Bell Labs, a 16 × 16 TFT array was built using organic transistors fabricated using
a stamp-transfer methods [95,96]. The resulting array was the first example of using organic semiconductors to
fabricate a flexible display. This achievement gained international attention, winning the American Chemical
Society Team Innovation award in 2002 and is designated as an “Editor’s Choice Best-of-the-Best” R&D100
award from R&D Magazine in 2001.
After this basic active-matrix compatibility was demonstrated, custom electronic controllers and backplane
designs enabled low power driving of high-resolution panels. Early work leveraged existing AMLCD TFT back-
plane architectures, using specialized controllers to interface with the panel drivers, and providing specialized
pixel-level voltage pulses unique to the E Ink EPD material [97]. Gates et al. described an improved controller for
EPD that elegantly repurposed the 16 bit wide LCD interface used for driving color panels to two 8-bit representa-
tions of the current and to-be-updated EPD pixel gray levels. The display subsystem was also shut off between
updates, allowing for ultra-low power operation due to the EPD image stability [97,98].
ii The E Ink-IBM collaboration was mentioned briefly in a 2000 article in the Wall Street Journal. Interestingly, the reporter noted
that IBM had a longstanding interest in newspapers, and was “supplying E Ink with millions of its laptop transistors for testing.”
A. Klein, “Will the Future Be Written in E-Ink?,” The Wall Street Journal, pp. 1–4, 04 Jan 2000.
24 1 The Rise, and Fall, and Rise of Electronic Paper
The collaboration with Philips Corporation was critical for the successful evolution of the E Ink displays. Many
such improvements are described in the paper by Henzen et al. [98]. EPD-specific backplane modifications
included two series transistors per pixel to enable large swing voltages, an enlarged storage capacitor to suppress
kickback effects, and the adoption of a thick acrylate coating as an inner-layer dielectric to create a field-shielded
pixel design. The Philips collaboration included a team from the Netherlands (Alex Henzen, Jan van de Kamer,
Neculai Aileni, Roger Delnoij, Guofu Zhou, Mark Johnson), and Japan (Michael Pitt, Masaru Yasui, Tadao
Nakamura, Tomohiro Tsuji).
The first EPD-based electronic reader, The Sony Librie EBR 1000, was introduced for sale in Japan in April
2004 [104]. The device was developed through a collaboration between Sony, E Ink, Philips, and Toppan
Printing.
The device used a proprietary Sony eBook format. Content could only be purchased from content providers
like Publishing Link via a PC and then transferred to the Libre by USB cable or memory stick. Digital rights
management built into the system allowed for content to be accessible for 60 days, after which it expired and
became unreadable. No support for pdf or other ebook formats was enabled. The device opened to middling
reviews, in large part due to these content-based restrictions. While the screen appearance was well-received,
many complained about the slow device interface, limited book offering, and the forced erasure of
content [105].
Over the next decade, Sony released a series of upgraded readers and started marketing them outside of Japan
in 2006. The devices never reached the volumes expected for such a product, and Sony exited the e-reader market
entirely in 2014 [106,107].
The Amazon Kindle was released in November 2007 and set the stage for a flourishing ebook ecosystem. This
first device was a 6″ diagonal display, 800 × 600 @167 pixels per inch, and four gray levels per pixel. E Ink provided
the microencapsulated electrophoretic material, the packaging design, and the driving scheme. Toppan printing
mass-produced the coating and conversion into sheet form the moisture-barrier protective sheet. Philips devel-
oped the backplane, timing controller, and other ICs, and assembled the final module. Amazon sold the Kindle
reader provided a large library of content for sale, and made it easy for customers to access that content. Year-by-
year improvements led to greater adoption and increasing sales of e-paper displays [107].
Despite the technical and product success of the Kindle, E Ink, the company was burdened by significant debt.
The company had invested in many years of technology and business development. Its large area sign business
only achieved modest success, and the Libre did not become a breakout product. Rather than maintain status as
a standalone company, E Ink was sold to the Taiwanese Company Prime View International (PVI) in 2009 to
enable further commercialization of the EPD technology [108]. Since then, PVI has renamed itself E Ink Holdings
and continues to develop electronic ink for ebooks, signage, and other products. Later on, SiPix was merged with
E Ink, with the microcup embossing technology enhancing the realization of high-performance color
e-paper [109,110].
26 1 The Rise, and Fall, and Rise of Electronic Paper
1.16 Summary
As is true for many technologies, the path for success for the electronic paper was not predictable. Periods of rapid
technical progress were followed by periods of little interest due to combinations of application status, competi-
tive technologies, and the commercial and financial landscape. Still, the rise, fall, and rise of electronic ink pro-
vides a nice success story for a technology that was envisioned to overcome a limitation of electronic displays and
eventually managed to do just that.
The development of electronic paper did not end with the introduction of the Kindle. The remaining chapters
of this book describe many exciting areas of development in this important field.
Acknowledgments
PSD is grateful for the assistance of Rob Zehner, Guy Danner, Howie Honeyman, Rich Webber, Glen Crossley,
Andrew Loxely, and Gregg Duthaler for useful discussions, and in proofreading the chapter.
BRY is grateful for the assistance of Guangyou Liu, Mingyang Yang, Zheng Zeng, Linyu Song, Hao Shu, Yifan
Gu, Yunhe Liu, Jie Liu, Xinzao Wu for manuscript preparation and in proofreading the chapters.
AC would like to acknowledge Joel Pollack for oral accounts of early development activities on Electrophoretic
Display Technology at various Xerox R&D Centers up to mid-1970; and Warren Jackson for facilitating fact-checks
from Xerox document archives.
References
1 Heikenfeld, J., Drzaic, P., Yeo, J. et al. (2011). Review paper: a critical review of the present and future prospects for
electronic paper. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 19(2): 129–156.
2 Eshkalak, S.K., Khatibzadeh, M., Kowsari, E. et al. (2019). Overview of electronic ink and methods of production
for use in electronic displays. Opt. Laser Technol. 117: 38–51.
3 http://paperproject.org/semgallery/semgallery1a.html#imagetop.
4 Smith, E., Heckaman, R.L., Lang, K. et al. (2020). Evaluating display color capability. Inf. Disp. 36(5): 9–15.
5 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Halftoningcolor.svg.
6 https://inkjetinsight.com/knowledge-base/high-speed-inkjet-devices-take-on-commercial-print-quality.
7 https://inkjetinsight.com/knowledge-base/understanding-gray-areas-inkjet.
8 The International Committee for Display Metrology, (2012). Information Display Measurement Standard, v 1.03, 477.
SID Publishers.
9 Shu, Y., Hagedon, M., and Heikenfeld, J. (2011). Light out-coupling for reflective displays: simple geometrical
model, MATLAB simulation, and experimental validation. J. Disp. Technol. 7(9): 473–477.
10 Robert, F., Sri, P., Robert, H. et al. (2018). 48-2: Electronic paper 2.0: frustrated eTIR as a path to color and video.
In: SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 49(1): 630–632.
11 Fleming, R., Kazlas, P., Johansson, T. et al. (2019). 36-3: Tablet-size eTIR display for low-power ePaper applications
with color video capability. In: SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 50(1): 505–508.
12 Mossman, M.A., Whitehead, L.A., and Rao, S.P. (2002). P-83: Grey scale control of TIR using electrophoresis of
sub-optical pigment particles. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 33(1): 522–525.
13 Satoshi, N., Kodama, Y. et al. (2013). 6.1: Invited paper: electronic paper system using high resolution
electrophoretic display. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 44(1): 34–37.
14 Lee, J.H., Horiuchi, T., and Saito, R. (2007). Confined-error-diffusion algorithm for flat-panel display.
J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 15: 507–518.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Sicilien gebracht. Der Corduan, der Saffian, das Chagrinleder und
die Juchten gaben ein vortreffliches Material für Bucheinbände ab.
Der Corduan (so nach der Stadt Cordova, von den Franzosen
Maroquin, von den Engländern Morocco genannt) ist ein narbiges
Ziegenleder, von dem sich der Saffian nur durch seine Glätte
unterscheidet. Der Chagrin (persisch Sagre) ist wie mit runden
Körnchen übersät, was durch Hineintreten von Samenkörnern
hervorgebracht wird. Juchten ist meist Rinds- oder Pferdeleder,
welches mit Laugen, Beizen und Farbstoffen behandelt und durch
Birkenöl geschmeidig gemacht wird.
ZWEITES BUCH.
DER
BUCHDRUCKERKUNST
1500—1750.
EINFÜHRUNG IN DAS ZWEITE BUCH. [←]
Diese Hinneigung zum Holzschnitt war nicht dem Zufall oder nur
der Bequemlichkeit, für ihn zu zeichnen, zuzuschreiben, sondern sie
lag in den Verhältnissen tiefer begründet. Es konnte nicht anders
sein, als dass die Maler der Reformationszeit, welche Zeugen der
Segnungen der Erfindung Gutenbergs waren, die populärste Kunst,
die Xylographie, deren Erzeugnisse so leicht und so weit durch die
Druckerpresse verbreitet werden konnten, freudig begrüssen und
begierig eine Gelegenheit ergreifen würden, durch welche auch sie
berufen waren, an dem grossen Werke der Reformation thätig
mitzuwirken.
Somit war ein grosser Teil des zweiten und des dritten
Jahrhunderts der Buchdruckerkunst eine, dieser sehr ungünstige
Zeit, in der sie nothwendigerweise leiden musste, und erst das vierte
Jahrhundert sollte sie zum neuen Glanz wieder erstehen sehen.