Qualitative Analysis of Wheat Grain Damage During Harvesting With John Deere Combine Harvester
Qualitative Analysis of Wheat Grain Damage During Harvesting With John Deere Combine Harvester
Qualitative Analysis of Wheat Grain Damage During Harvesting With John Deere Combine Harvester
org
Qualitative Analysis of Wheat Grain Damage during Harvesting with John Deere Combine Harvester
M. LASHGARI, H. MOBLI, M. OMID1, R. ALIMARDANI AND S.S. MOHTASEBI
Department of Agriculture Machinery, Faculty of Bio-System Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran 1 Corresponding author's e-mail: omid@ut.ac.ir
ABSTRACT
Effects of forward speed, cylinder rotation and clearance between combines cylinder and concave on wheat kernel breakage and seed germination were studied through analysis of variance. Three levels of adjustments for each of the variables, namely 1.2, 1.8 and 2.5 km h-1 for forward speed, 800, 900, 1000 rpm for cylinder rotation and 15, 20 and 25 mm for the clearance between cylinder and concave were constituted the variables. Results indicated an increase in kernel breakage and a decrease in seed germination due to decrease in forward speed, increase in cylinder rotation and decrease in clearance between cylinder and concave. The interaction between forward speed and cylinder rotation indicated a least kernel breakage of 5.47% along with the most seed germination of 96.61% arising from a forward speed of 1.8 km h-1 together with cylinder rotation of 800 rpm. Also, an interaction between cylinder rotation and concave clearance indicated a least kernel breakage of 5.38% at 900 rpm and 25 mm, respectively. A maximum seed germination of 96.58% was observed for the same above figures of cylinder rotation and clearance between cylinder and concave. Interactions between other combinations were non-significant. The most suitable adjustments for 955 model John Deere combine in the studied area would be 800 and/or 900 rpm, 1.8 km h-1 and 25 mm for cylinder rotation, forward speed and cylinder concave clearance, respectively. Key Words: Wheat; Combine harvesting; Loss; Breakage; Germination
INTRODUCTION
Wheat is considered as the most important crop in Iran. It plays a major role as food for people. Wheat production is accompanied by major losses in Iran. Factors causing these losses have been known, but they have not been quantitatively evaluated. A majority of losses occur during harvest from combine harvesting. Timely operation, separation of grain from materials other than grain (MOG) with a least amount of loss and preservation of crop quality are some factors to which full attention must be paid in a good an efficient harvest. In recent years, a lot of works have been done on how to reduce grain losses during harvesting (Mohtasebi et al., 2006). There are however, other losses such as those arise from damage to quality and the breakage of seed, which are also needed to be considered. For example, the breakage of grain will adversely affect seed germination, storage capacity, grain processing operations and final price of the product. Mansoori and Minaee (2003) determined the effect of cylinder rotational seed and cylinder concave clearance on losses in the threshing unit. The authors found that an increase in cylinder concave clearance results in less breakage of grain. Arvinder et al. (2001) studied the effect of grain moisture, cylinder speed and feeding rate on mechanical damage inflicted upon the grain during combine
harvesting as well as on seed germination. Dreszer and Gieroba (1999) carried out experiments to determine the mechanical damages introduced into several kinds of grains during harvest by multi-drum combines. Gill et al. (2002) tried to determine combines thresher unit performance by considering the different factors effective in efficient wheat combine harvesting. Kowalczuk (1999) presented data obtained from combine harvesting of soybean in different regions in Poland. Santokh et al. (2002) evaluated field performance in combine harvesting of rice. Tahir et al. (2003), while experimenting on a denominator model of Class combine in Pakistan reported an average grain loss of 1.25%. Singh et al. (2002) investigated the effect of crop and machine parameters on threshing effectiveness and seed quality of soybean. They determined the external damage inflicted on the grain by finding the weight of broken grains in specified samples. They found that external damage increased with increase in cylinder speed at all moisture levels and variations in cylinder speed had little effect on germination rate. Investigations carried out by Kirkkari et al. (2001) in Finland on rye grain mechanical damage during threshing indicated an increase in germination rate followed by a decrease in cylinder speed. Kumar and Goss (2000) used data obtained from 224 field experiments to present models for combine performance. Model presented for broken seeds indicated significant correlation between
To cite this paper: Lashgari, M., H. Mobli, M. Omid, R. Alimardani and S.S. Mohtasebi, 2008. Qualitative analysis of wheat damage during harvesting with John Deere combine harvester. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 10: 2014
ESTIMATION OF WHEAT GRAIN DAMAGE DURING MECHANICAL HARVESTING / Int. J. Agri. Biol., Vol. 10, No. 2, 2008 cylinder speed and seed breakage. They found that an increase from 6 to 9% in broken seeds could be observed by an increase in cylinder speed from 20 to 25 m sec-1. Andrews et al. (1993) in Philippine studied the effects of operational parameters in rice combine harvesting on crop quality and losses. It was demonstrated that feeding rate is the determining factor in rates of loss. The objective of this study was to investigate effects of forward speed, cylinder speed and clearance between cylinder and concave on seed breakage and germination. The experiments are conducted during 2005 wheat harvest period by a model 955 John Deere combine harvester on the experimental farm of University of Tehran at Karaj. performed by using MINITAB (http://www.minitab.com). 13.0 software
202
LASHGARI et al. / Int. J. Agri. Biol., Vol. 10, No. 2, 2008 Fig. 1. Interaction between forward speed and cylinder speed on wheat breakage
800(rpm) 12 Breakage(%) 10 8 6 4 2 0 1.2 1.8 Forward Speed(km/hr) 2.5 c bc c bc a a b c c 900(rpm) 1000(rpm)
Table I. Analysis of variance of the effect of forward speed, cylinder rotational speed and cylinder concave clearance on seed breakage and germination rate
Source DOF Breakage Germination Replication 2 1.248 0.482 Forward Speed (FS) 2 9.106* 3.896** Cylinder Speed (CS) 2 106.769** 42.214** Concave Clearance (CC) 2 8.952* 3.311* FS CS 4 5.916* 2.528* FS CC 4 0.787 0.313 CS CC 4 9.053** 3.031** FS CS CC 8 1.282 0.390 Error 52 2.056 0.761 19.76% 0.91% C.V. *significant on the level of 5% **significant on the level of 1%
Fig. 2. Interaction between forward speed and cylinder speed on wheat germination
800(rpm) 100 Germination(%) 98 96 94 92 90 1.2 1.8 Forward Speed(km/hr) 2.5 ab abc d ab bc d ab ab 900(rpm) 1000(rpm)
Table II. Comparison of Means (grain breakage & seed germination) through Duncan method and at different levels of variable factors
c
Factor Forward Speed (km/hr) 1.2 1.8 2.5 Cylinder Speed (rpm) 800 900 1000 Concave Clearance (mm) 15 20 25 Breakage 7.778a 7.356ab 6.630b 5.704c 6.563b 9.496a 7.919a 6.948b 6.896b Germination 95.14b 95.40ab 95.89a 96.45a 95.91a 94.07b 95.07b 95.68a 95.68a
Fig. 3. Interaction between concave clearance and cylinder speed on wheat breakage
800(rpm) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 15 20 Concave Clearance(mm) 25 d bc d cd a bc d d 900(rpm) 1000(rpm) a
Fig. 4. Interaction between concave clearance and cylinder speed on wheat germination
800(rpm) 100 Germination(%) 98 96 94 92 90 15 20 Concave Clearance(mm) 25 a bc e ab abc cd a a de 900(rpm) 1000(rpm)
rotational speed (See Fig. 1 & 2) indicates: (i) least breakage in grain occurs at forward speed of 1.8 km h-1 and 800 rpm
cylinder speed and (ii) maximum breakage in seed occurs at forward speed of 1.2 km h-1 and 1000 rpm cylinder speed. As far as seed germination rates are concerned (Fig. 2) following conclusions can be made: (i) mximum seed germination occurs at forward speed of 1.8 km h-1 and 800 rpm cylinder speed and minimum seed germination occurs at forward speed of 1.2 km h-1 and 1000 rpm cylinder speed. It becomes evident that with an increase in cylinder speed, the number of impacts between grain and cylinder increases; also damage incurred to grain becomes more contact between seed, cylinder and concave when there is less throughput of material in the threshing section of the combine. The interaction between cylinder speed and cylinder concave clearance, which is demonstrated in Fig. 3 indicates: A minimum of breakage in grain occurs at a cylinder speed of 900 rpm and a cylinder concave clearance of 25 mm, whereas a maximum of grain breakage is observed when the cylinder speed is 1000 rpm and cylinder concave clearance is chosen 15 mm. As seed germination rate is concerned, it is revealed from Fig. 4 that: (i) maximum seed germination is resulted from an interaction between cylinder speed of 900 rpm and cylinder concave clearance of 25 mm and (ii) minimum of seed germination is obtained, when cylinder speed is 1000 rpm and cylinder concave clearance 15 mm.
Breakage(%)
203
ESTIMATION OF WHEAT GRAIN DAMAGE DURING MECHANICAL HARVESTING / Int. J. Agri. Biol., Vol. 10, No. 2, 2008 A combination of increase in cylinder speed and decrease in the clearance between cylinder and concave as an interaction between the two variables indicates much breakage of seed and little seed germination. In fact, increase in cylinder speed results in progressive damage to the grain and seed (Srivastava et al., 2003).
REFERENCES
Andrews, S.B., T.J. Siebenmorgen, E.D. Vories and D.H. Lower, 1993. Effects of combine operating parameters on harvest loss and quality in rice. Trans. ASAE, 36: 1599607 Arvinder, S., I.K. Garg, V.K. Sharma and A. Singh, 2001. Effect of different crop and operational parameters of a combine on grain damage during paddy harvesting. J. Res. Punjab Agric. University, 38: 24152 Dreszer, K. and J. Gieroba, 1999. Mechanical damage to grain in multidrum threshing and separating sets. Int. Agrophysics, 13: 738 Gill, R.S., S. Santokh and S. Singh, 2002. Performance studies on plot thresher for wheat. J. Res. Punjab Agric. University, 39: 40816 Kirkkari, A.M., S.P. Peltonen and H. Rita, 2001. Reducing grain damage in naked oat through gentle harvesting. Agric. Food Sci. Finland, 10: 2239 Kowalczuk, J., 1999. Pattern of seed losses and damage soybean harvest with grain combine harvester. Int. Agrophysics, 13: 1037 Kumar, R. and J.R. Goss, 1979. Analysis and modeling of alfalfa seed harvest losses. Trans. ASAE, 22: 23742 Mansoori, H. and S. Minaee, 2003. Effects of Machine Parameters on Wheat Losses of Combine Harvester, pp: 924. First National Symposium on losses of agricultural products, Tehran: Iran Mohtasebi, S.S., M. Behroozi-Lar, J. Alidadi and K. Besharti, 2006. A new design for grain combine thresher. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 8: 6803 Santokh, S., H.S. Sidhu, S.S. Ahuja and S. Singh, 2002. Grain losses in combine harvesting of paddy. J. Res. Punjab Agric. University, 39: 3958 Singh, K.N. and B. Singh, 1981. Effect of crop and machine parameters on threshing effectiveness and seed quality of soybean. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 26: 34955 Srivastava, A.K., C.E. Goering and R.P. Rohrbach, 1993. Engineering Principles of Agricultural Machines. ASAE Textbook; No. 6, St. Joseph MI, Tahir, A.R., Khan and E. Khurram, 2003. Techno-economic feasibility of combine harvester (class denominator). Int. J. Agric. Biol., 5: 5760 (Received 15 March 2006; Accepted 13 March 2007)
CONCLUSION
Data obtained from field and laboratory experiments were analyzed with regard to grain crop quality loss. Effects of forward speed, cylinder rotation and clearance between combines cylinder and concave on wheat kernel breakage and seed germination were studied through analysis of variance. Results of the present investigation indicates that for model 955 John Deere combine harvester in Karaj area a combination of the following factors would render the proper adjustment of the combine for wheat harvest. A cylinder speed of 800 and/or 900 rpm, a cylinder concave clearance of 25 mm adjusted for a combine harvesting at a forward speed of 1.8 km h-1. Since Mansouri and Minaee (2003) concluded that an increase in cylinder rotational speed from 750 to 950 rpm would double grain breakage, it is recommended that cylinder rotational speed of 800 rpm be chosen. Acknowledgements. The financial support provided by Tehran University, Iran, through a grant-in-aid for research work is gratefully acknowledged.
204