Page 1

History and Development of Neuropsychological Assessment:

1. What is Neuropsychological Assessment?

• Definition: The evaluation of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functions

through standardized tests to determine brain function.
• Purpose: Identifies how brain injuries or disorders affect thinking, mood, and
behavior.

2. Early Beginnings in Brain-Behavior Studies

• Ancient Egyptians: Practiced trepanation, recognizing the brain’s importance.

• Hippocrates (460–370 BCE): Proposed that the brain is responsible for
thought, emotions, and behavior.
• Franz Gall’s Phrenology (1796): Linked skull shape to mental faculties
(discredited but an early attempt to link brain function with behavior).

3. Key Milestones in Neuropsychological History

• Broca’s Discovery (1861):

◦ Paul Broca identified Broca’s area, responsible for speech production, in
a patient who had speech deficits but could understand language.
◦ Significance: Marked the start of linking specific brain regions with
functions.
• Wernicke’s Area (1874):
◦ Carl Wernicke discovered a brain region associated with language
comprehension.
◦ Helped differentiate between production and understanding of language.

4. Advances in the 20th Century

• World War I & II: Surge in neuropsychological assessments for brain injuries
in soldiers. Clinical tests began to identify cognitive deficits from traumatic
brain injuries.

• Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale (1939):

◦ One of the first standardized assessments for intelligence that helped

measure cognitive function related to brain injury.
• Halstead-Reitan Battery (1950s):

◦ A comprehensive set of tests for assessing brain damage.

◦ Focused on sensory, motor, cognitive, and executive functions.
Page 2
5. Modern Neuropsychological Assessment Tools

• Computerized Tomography (CT) Scans (1970s):

◦Enabled more precise brain imaging, helping to correlate structural brain

damage with cognitive deficits.
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI (fMRI):

◦ Provided detailed images of brain structure (MRI) and function (fMRI)

during tasks, further advancing brain-behavior analysis.
• Advanced Test Batteries:

◦ Neuropsychological Test Batteries: Such as the Luria-Nebraska

Neuropsychological Battery and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, used
for evaluating executive function, attention, and memory.

6. Applications of Neuropsychological Assessments

• Diagnosis: Identifying neurological disorders like Alzheimer's, Parkinson’s,

stroke, and traumatic brain injuries.
• Rehabilitation: Assists in treatment planning for cognitive impairments.
• Research: Helps study brain development and the effects of injuries or disease
on behavior.

INDICATIONS FOR NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTS : REVIEW BY

Joseph Kulas and Richard Naugle

WHAT IS NEUROPSYCHOLOGY?
Neuropsychology, the intersection of neurology, psychology, and psychiatry, is an
applied science that examines the behavioral manifestations of brain dysfunction.

More than memory testing

Neuropsychological assessment is often seen as simply a means of testing memory,

but it is more than that. A comprehensive assessment covers a range of cognitive
domains, including intelligence, learning, memory, receptive and expressive
language, visuospatial reasoning, motor functioning, executive functioning, and
psychopathology. A brain injury or psychological disorder can disrupt any of these
cognitive domains, which in turn can potentially affect other domains. For example,
memory difficulties may be due to a poor attention span, disruption in language
abilities, sensory problems, or slowed processing due to emotional disruption. All
potentially contribute to the difficulty that is experienced as "memory disruption.”
Disrupted cognition can signify many problems, in much the same way that fatigue
and pain can be due to many disorders and pathologic processes. Determining the
exact nature of the deficit is important.
Page 3

Thorough neuropsychological assessment can provide information that might be used

to refine a diagnosis, plan treatment, or establish a baseline against which
improvement or deterioration can be compared.

What the patient can expect

Patients referred to a neuropsychologist spend a day taking tests of general intellect,

higher-level executive skills (e.g., sequencing, reasoning, problem-solving) attention.
This helps them feel comfortable and reduces anxiety. Sometimes the psychologist
personally gives the tests; other times, a technician who has been thoroughly trained
in the administration of the measures may do it. In either case, the psychologist is
responsible for interpreting the data obtained. Most patients receive feedback from
the psychologist about their performance, or from the referring physician if the
evaluation is part of a larger assessment. Patients are generally told that their test
scores will be compared with those of people who are similar to them in important
ways. They can also be informed that the test results can be used in a number of
manners, including identifying weaknesses in specific areas, differentiating among
illnesses, establishing a baseline against which future assessments can be compared,
and planning treatments that accommodate their functional deficits.

According to the most recent practice survey by the American Psychological

Association, neuropsychological evaluations typically take 4 to 8 hours (average 6).
The average charge in 1990 was approximately $100/hour; the current cost is likely
higher. Neuropsychological evaluation is often covered by insurance when it is
deemed medically necessary and is often reimbursed under the patient's medical
benefit.

HISTORY OF A DISCIPLINE

The first evidence of behavioral consequences of cerebral dysfunction is from an

Egyptian papyrus written between 2500 and 3000 BCE. The unknown author
describes behavioral manifestations of serious head injuries in numerous patients he
or she observed, including "this eye is askew. he walks with shuffling with his sole."
The author also recognized the lateralization of functions, going on to state that the
effects of injuries varied among different patients depending on the side of the body
affected. Later work, including that of Broca, Wernicke, Brodmann, Penfield, and
Milner, furthered our understanding of complex brain-behavior relationships.

Neuropsychological assessment began in earnest in the 20th century with the

construction of batteries and tests aimed at identifying and evaluating the severity of
behavioral deficits in patients with brain damage and aiding in diagnosis. One goal of
these assessments was to pinpoint the location of brain lesions, as sophisticated
neuroimaging had not yet been developed.
Page 4
The most commonly used test battery was devised by Halstead and Reitan, who
correlated test results with findings on autopsy after the patients died. Their goal was
to determine the site of lesions by noninvasive means as an aid in diagnosis. The
Halstead-Reitan battery was found useful in assessing not only severe deficits but
also moderate and mild dysfunction. It also proved helpful in describing the
functional deficits that arise from brain dysfunction. Furthermore, it allowed
physicians to make reasoned judgments about whether the deficits observed were
"organic" (i.e., due to neurologic factors) or "psychiatric" (i.e., due to psychological
factors). Ways of assessing cognitive function have since been expanded and refined.
However, central to all approaches is the notion that the pattern of data obtained from
the tests provides information about the location and effect of brain lesions and the
functional deficits that accompany them.

NEUROPSYCHOLOGY VS NEUROIMAGING

Now that we have the technology to image previously hidden areas of the brain,
today's neuropsychologists are less often asked to deduce the location of brain
lesions. Nevertheless, they still have an important role in characterizing the
behavioral sequelae of brain injuries and illnesses, for several reasons:

1. Structure does not equal function. Neuroimaging can locate structural

lesions accurately, but we cannot accurately predict the functional sequelae (the
cognitive and behavioral changes that follow a neurologic insult) using
structural data alone; substantial variability exists among patients with regard
to their structural and functional integrity. Indeed, one could argue that, for the
patient, function is more important than structure.

2. The nature and extent of behavioral deficits and retained abilities can be
defined only through formal neuropsychological testing. The tests provide
useful information about the patient's competency and decision-making
capacity and have implications for the choice of treatment.

3. Structural changes are not always visible. Many neurologic disorders result
from structural changes that are invisible to even the highest-resolution
scanners. Examples include Alzheimer disease, transient ischemic attacks,
many epilepsies, and many infections of the brain and spinal cord.

4. Neuropsychological assessment is also useful in many disorders of children

in which no markers can be visualized, such as attention deficit/hyperactivity
disorder, specific verbal and nonverbal learning disabilities, neurotoxic
exposure, and some concussions and infectious processes. In some instances,
neuropsychological examinations provide objective data that help specify the
diagnosis.
Page 5
5. Even when a diagnosis can be made with specific physical markers,
neuropsychology can play an important role. For example, although Down
syndrome is readily identified by its physical manifestations and specific
genetic abnormality (trisomy 21), neuropsychological assessment can provide
invaluable prognostic information to families concerning their children's
abilities. Once again, the functional capabilities mean as much as the structural
abnormalities, if not more.

6. Symptoms often precede visible structural changes. If some diseases are

detected early by their behavioral symptoms, physicians can often provide
better care and manage symptoms better.

7. For example, if a progressive incurable disorder such as Alzheimer disease is

diagnosed early, the patient and family members have more time to plan for the
inevitable deterioration in function.

8. Neuropsychological evaluation is useful for serial assessment, providing

objective measures of progressive deterioration or recovery following
traumatic brain injuries or strokes. Serial assessments are, however,
confounded by repeated exposure to the test, a phenomenon called "practice
effect" or "test-retest effect." To counteract this, researchers have estimated the
amount of improvement that might be expected on various measures as a result
of repeated testing, thus allowing for more refined estimates of cognitive
improvement or decline. Furthermore, neuropsychologists have developed
multiple measures that tap similar functional areas without repeating specific
content. Consequently, sometimes testing can be done numerous times over the
course of a patient's treatment without duplicating measures, thereby limiting
the effects of practice.

NEUROPSYCHOLOGY VS MENTAL STATUS TESTING

Short and easy-to-give tests such as the MMSE have grown in popularity as screening
measures of cognitive abilities. They have the advantages of being brief, objective,
and quantitative. On the other hand, although these tests give some information about
the patient's general abilities, recent research suggests that they are not as useful as a
thorough cognitive assessment. Anthony et al. and Dick et al. found that the MMSE
gives an overabundance of false-positive results for people over 60 years of age or
with less than 9 years of education. In addition, the MMSE has a low "ceiling." That
is, even with cognitive decline, persons with high verbal intelligence quotients tend to
score higher on the MMSE than the recognized cutoff score (24) that indicates
cognitive impairment. Thus, those who perform well are not necessarily cognitively
intact.Physicians often ask what cutoff scores suggest that a referral should be made,
but the high number of false-negatives that would result from the use of cutoffs
makes such recommendations inadvisable. Instead, physicians should use the MMSE
to frame areas of difficulty and use patients' reports of cognitive difficulties as better
indicators.
Page 6
WHEN TO REFER?

Although neurologists and psychiatrists make most referrals for neuropsychological

services, internists, family practice physicians, and other primary health care
professionals are often the first to see the indications of cognitive impairment.

Clinical indications for neuropsychological assessment

• Changes in memory

◦ Amnesia
◦ Poor short-term recall
◦ Frequently loses items
◦ Gets lost easily
◦ Fails to recognize familiar persons
• Poor attention and concentration

◦ Doesn't appear to listen

◦ Gets confused in conversations
◦ Does poorly in complex situations
• Changes in language functioning

◦ Aphasia
◦ Agnosia
◦ Dysfluency
• Changes in visuospatial abilities

◦ Difficulty drawing
◦ Difficulty navigating (using a map or understanding directions)
◦ Misperceiving the environment
• Impaired executive function

◦ Perseverative
◦ Poor judgment
◦ Rigidity in thought
• Changes in emotional functioning

◦ Increased anxiety
◦ Increased depression
◦ Psychoses
◦ Fluctuations in mental status
◦ Disorientation
Page 7
A referral for neuropsychological evaluation should be considered any time there is a
question about a patient's cognitive functioning. Some common clinical problems that
warrant referral for neuropsychological assessment include:

• Declines in memory (even if limited to short-term memory) or other cognitive

processes
• Sudden changes in behavior (i.e., confusion, disorientation)
• Sudden or progressive changes in mental status
• Concerns about the effects of age on cognition
• Questions about the safety of the patient’s living situation or ability to care for
oneself
• Questions about competency for decision-making
• Questions regarding treatment plans or rehabilitation goals

Case Study: Ms. Smith’s Journey Through Neuropsychology

Ms. Smith was referred for a neuropsychological evaluation. The referring physician
asked whether her neurocognitive deficits were consistent with a neurodegenerative
process or were more likely the result of psychological disruption.

The evaluation showed that Ms. Smith had significant psychomotor slowing,
impaired attention and concentration, mild memory impairments, and significant
depressive symptoms, including fatigue, loss of appetite, and poor self-concept. The
pattern of her performance was not indicative of a progressive neurodegenerative
process.

Ms. Smith was referred for psychiatric consultation for medication management and
for individual psychotherapy. She was encouraged to use memory aids during the
interim, including notebooks to record important information.

Conclusions

Neuropsychology is a rich and rapidly growing field. With improved technology,

researchers are finding more and more connections between neurobiology and
behavior. Advances in neuroimaging have opened doors to understanding the
underlying mechanisms of various disorders, while neuropsychological assessment
continues to provide critical information about the functional consequences of
neurological disorders. In a world where mental health is becoming increasingly
prioritized, neuropsychology will continue to play a vital role in understanding and
improving cognitive and emotional well-being.
Page 8

APPROACHES TO
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
Three approaches are usually followed worldwide for carrying out neuropsychological evaluation.
These are:

• Single tests
• Test batteries
• Qualitative syndrome analysis

Single Test Approach (STA)

STA was previously based on the assumption that the brain is a unitary organ, and impairment of
the brain will have a unitary type of behavioral effect. But now, we know that lesions in different
areas of the brain may cause different types of behavioral impairments. So, single tests are used
either to evaluate speci c functions or in combination with other evaluative procedures as per
requirements, which is known as the " exible" or "adjunctive" approach.

Single tests can again be classi ed according to the speci c abilities of the brain, such as:

• Intellectual functioning
• Reasoning
• Concept formation
• Problem solving
• Orientation
• Attention
• Vigilance
• Language
• Memory
• Perceptuomotor abilities
• Auditory and somatosensory perception
• Psychomotor functions

Intellectual Function

The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, which was revised in 1981 as the WAIS-R (both verbal and
performance), and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) are the most
widely used tests for the assessment of cognitive impairment associated with cerebral disease. They
have the advantage of standardization in large normative populations and yield highly reliable
results when the ndings of different examiners are compared.

The WAIS-R is also standardized in the Indian population and widely used to assess cognitive
functions. The Bhatia Battery of Performance Intelligence Tests is another Indian approach to assess
intellectual functioning. Raven's Progressive Matrices is used in a variety of situations and is
considered to be a very sensitive measure in neuropsychological evaluation.
fi
fi
fi
fl
fi
Page 9

Reasoning, Concept Formation, and Problem-Solving

Generally, Kelley’s Reparatory Grid Test (Banister & Fransella, 1966) and Goldstein Scheerer’s
Object Sorting Test (Goldstein & Scheerer, 1941) are the most commonly used tests for these
abilities. Besides this, the Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test is found to be an effective procedure for
assessing abstract reasoning and exibility in problem-solving.

Memory and Orientation

The Wechsler Memory Scale (Wechsler, 1945) is the most widely used test for memory. The PGI
Memory Scale (Persad & Varma, 1975), which is standardized on the Indian population, is used
mostly in India. Visuospatial material has generally been employed to test nonverbal memory using
both recall and recognition procedures. Benton's Visual Retention Test (BVRT) and the Memory for
Designs Test (MFDT) are usually used for this purpose. Quantitative analysis of orientation is made
by using the schedule of questions, developed by Benton, Allen & Fogel (1983), known as the
Temporal Orientation Test.

Attention and Vigilance

These are very important areas in neuropsychological testing. Usually, attention and information
processing are evaluated by a number of widely employed clinical procedures and by parts of other
tests. However, the Continuous Performance Test (CPT), Cancellation Tests (letter, number, symbol,
color), and the Knox-Cube Imitation Test are a few tests designed to test attention.

Language Functions

Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Battery and Multilingual Aphasia Examinations are the standard
instruments to assess language functions.

Visuo-Perceptive Capacity

Generally, the Bender Gestalt Test, Hidden Figures Test, Constructional Praxis Test (Block
Designing Test), and Facial Recognition Test are used for this.

Auditory Perception

This can be evaluated by Seashore's Test.

Somato-Sensory Perception

This can be assessed by the Tactile Performance Test.

Psychomotor Functions

These are generally assessed by the Reaction Time Paradigm. Other measures of the speed of
movement that have been used clinically are the Finger Tapping Test and Quickness in Placing Pegs
in a Board.
fl
Page 10

Neuropsychological Test Batteries

Neuropsychological test batteries assess the major functional areas. They do not simply screen for
the presence or absence of brain damage but also evaluate a number of functional areas that may be
affected by brain damage. A comprehensive neuropsychological battery usually assesses attention,
perceptual ability, language, abstraction, memory, intellectual processes, and motor skills.

These batteries also allow for independent use of either quantitative or qualitative measures, or
both, for interpretation. An example of only quantitative measurement is the Halstead-Reitan
Battery developed by Halstead (1947) and modi ed by Reitan (1976). An example of an integrated
approach using both quantitative and qualitative measurement is the Luria-Nebraska
Neuropsychological Battery, developed by Golden, Hammech & Purisch (1980, 1981).

There are some other neuropsychological batteries that are not in as much use. These include the
Michigan Neuropsychological Test Battery, developed by Smith (1980), and Contributions to
Neuropsychological Assessment, by Benton et al. (1983).

Qualitative Syndrome Analysis

Christensen’s (1975) translation of Luria's Neuropsychological Investigation is the best available
example of the qualitative approach. It is a very exible approach where hypotheses are formulated
and tested. This is also called Qualitative Syndrome Analysis.

Unfortunately, not much work has been done in India in this area. Most of the studies conducted in
India were based on the unitary assessment of a function, such as intelligence, memory, or
visuomotor coordination, etc. An extensive review of Indian literature has been reported by Siddiqui
and Prasad (1989), highlighting the tools frequently used to assess neuropsychological functioning
in India.

The intelligence tests (Bhatia Battery of Performance Intelligence Test, Wechsler’s Adult
Intelligence Scale - Revised, Raven’s Progressive Matrices, Binet-Kamath Test of Intelligence, and
Cattell's Culture Fair Test) have been reported to be the most frequently used measures, followed by
memory tests (PGI - Memory Scale and Wechsler's Memory Scale), visuomotor coordination tests
(Bender Gestalt Test & Nahor Benson Test), and visual retention tests (Benton's Visual Retention
Test).

Recently, in 1990, Pershad and Verma developed a new neuropsychological battery, standardized on
the Indian population, known as the P.G.I. Battery of Brain Dysfunction. It comprises the PGI
Memory Scale, Revised Bhatia's Short Battery of Performance Tests of Intelligence, Indian
adaptation of WAIS-R (Verbal), Nahor-Benson Test, and Bender Gestalt Test. However, the
reliability and validity of this battery are yet to be established.
fi
fl
Page 11