Piccioni 2019
Piccioni 2019
Piccioni 2019
Chapter Title: Τὸ αἰσχρὸν καὶ τὸ καλόν: “Beauty and the Beast” and Domestic Cults in
Western Greece
Chapter Author(s): Aura Piccioni
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Parnassos Press – Fonte Aretusa is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Looking at Beauty to Kalon in Western Greece
The concept of beauty was the center of the attention for the
Ancients. Its definition, however, remains elusive: is beauty found in
the whole of something, or do the parts of a thing each have to be
beautiful? Is beauty in proportion, light, symmetry, and color?3 Is it
in the shape, in the unity?4 Does the beauty of a body depend on
communion with the divine λόγος?5 Is form beautiful, and
formlessness ugly? One thing about beauty, though, was clear:
…beauty is that which has real being, but ugliness is the nature
opposite to this. It is this that is the first evil; just as beauty is
likewise the first of things beautiful and good. Or it may be that
goodness and beauty are one and the same. Therefore, we must
investigate the beautiful and good, and the ugly and evil, by the
same process.6
These words of the 3rd c. CE Neoplatonic philosopher Plotinus,
probably derive from Plato himself, who introduced the idea of
beauty being connected to “love,” “desire” and the “good,” in
contraposition to the ugly, which can be recognized as such through
the same process, even if opposite, used to define beauty. Even
though ancient Greek art is especially renowned for its expressions
of beauty, it was also able – by contrast – to express ugliness. This
paper will focus on the ways in which ugliness can serve to enhance
the concept of beauty, and what their association could mean in the
contexts of the domestic cults of Western Greece.
3 Cf. Plot. I, 1.
4 Cf. Plot. I, 2.
5 Cf. Plot. I, 2.
66
This content downloaded from
157.51.107.190 on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:25:11 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Beauty and the Besast
Archaeological Field Survey Bradano to Basento, eds. Joseph Coleman Carter and
Alberto Prieto, (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2011), 489-538; R. Miller
Ammermann, “Interpreting Terracottas,” 363.
67
Miller Ammermann
underlines that there is also
another version of the
plaque, where Pan
precedes his beautiful
female dancing partner,
who now wears a polos or a
crown over the veil (figs. 2-
3).13 Pan is substituted on
some molds by a Silenus
with equine ears, but the
iconography of the female
remains the same.14
Remarkably, as noted
above, a large number of
terracotta molds with this
iconography have also
Fig. 3: Miller Ammermann, “Interpreting been found in the
Terrcottas,” p. 374, fig. n.375, fig. n. 10.
sanctuaries of Pantanello,
in the chora of Metapontum, as well as in the urban center of the
Greek city, specifically in temple E.15
Appropriately, R. Miller Ammermann refuses to change the
interpretation of the woman based on the changing of her partner, as
other scholars have done, identifying her as a nymph when she
dances with Pan and as a Maenad when she is accompanied by
Silenus.16 In both cases, this association of beauty and ugly appears
to have had an important meaning for the cult, as one will now
demonstrate.
Beauty Contrasted with Ugliness
It is interesting and important to notice how high the percentage
of these plaques is. Moreover, the iconography constantly represents
68
This content downloaded from
157.51.107.190 on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:25:11 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Beauty and the Besast
Editoriale 1989), 50; John Boardman, The great god Pan. The survival of an image
(New York: Thames and Hudson 1997), 14.
20 Cf. Eleonora Grillo, Marina Rubinich, Roberta Schenal Pileggi, “I pinakes di Locri
21 Cf. Paola Zancani Montuoro, “Persefone e Afrodite sul mare,” in: Essays in memory
of Karl Lehmann, ed. Lucy Freeman Sandler (New York: Institute of Fine Arts,
New York University, 1964), 386-95.
70
This content downloaded from
157.51.107.190 on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:25:11 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Beauty and the Besast
22
National Archaeological Museum, Athens 3335.
23 Quote from J. Boardman, The great god Pan, 37.
24 Syracuse, Museo Archeologico Regionale Paolo Orsi, 23912. Cf. John Davidson
71
25 Henry Lillie Pierce Fund, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Massachusetts 01.8032. Cf.
J. Boardman, The great god Pan, 32-33, fig. 40.
26 Cf. Giovanni Pugliese Carratelli (ed.), Le lamine d’oro orfiche. Istruzioni per il viaggio
72
This content downloaded from
157.51.107.190 on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:25:11 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Beauty and the Besast
vase, because they are bald and extremely “unpleasant,” to adopt the
terminology already used by Boardman.
The god of wilderness seems to accompany a dancing Maenad
with the sound of the aulos on an Attic black-figure neck-amphora, to
be dated around the beginning of the 5th c. BCE (fig. 6),27 which seems
to be a prelude to the iconography of our plaque. In fact, Pan, who is
recognizable thanks to his aspect (having the head of a goat, like the
two abovementioned daemonic figures), with his goat-like face and
body, is depicted as playing the aulos, while the beautiful Maenad at
his side outstretches her arms in movements of dance, exactly as they
appear on our plaques. This motif seems to find a direct model, as
underlined by R. Miller Ammermann, in some reliefs discovered in
Attica, dedicated to the Nymphs and coming from the Demetric
sanctuary of Eleusis.28
Not only is Pan connected to Aphrodite through myth and the
arts, but also Satyrs are associated with Nymphs, even from their
birth, as Hesiod (apud Strab. 10.471) attests, mentioning such
supernatural beings as the descendants of Phoroneos’s daughter:29
Once again, the wilderness and ugliness of these figures find their
counterpart in the beauty of their female companions. This
connection was not so superficial, since one could think that ugliness
and beauty were complementary to each other as the two sides of the
same coin in aiming and guaranteeing the fertility and reproduction
of crops, animals, and people.30 Ugliness became, then, also a symbol
of wilderness and of nature, embodied by the Satyrs and Pan.
In central Italy, the same iconography of our mold from
Metapontum, depicting a dancing Satyr or Pan and a beautiful
maiden, can be retraced in a late Archaic terracotta antefix group of
27 Cape Town, South Africa Cultural History Museum, L64.4. Cf. J. Boardman, The
great god Pan, 27, fig. 31.
28 Cf. R. Miller Ammermann, “Interpreting Terracottas,” 369, 382, fig. n. 23.
29
Fede Berti, Caterina Cornelio Cassai, Paola Desantis, Silvana Sani (eds.), La
coroplastica di Spina. Immagini di culto, Catalogue of the exposition, Ferrara, 12-
24 settembre 1987 (Ferrara: Il Museo 1987), 17.
30 Cf. F. Berti, C. Cornelio Cassai, P. Desantis, S. Sani, La coroplastica, 17.
73
a Satyr and a Maenad (c. 490 BCE) from the temple of Mater Matuta,
at Satricum, once again in connection to nature and to the figure of
Dionysos31.
The same meaning seems to have been passed down during the
Roman age, even if Pan was not always depicted as monstrous. For
example, the union of ugliness and beauty is what it is represented
on a wall-painting of the first c. CE coming from Pompeii,32 showing
Pan in the act of uncovering a beautiful Hermaphrodite, who still
preserved a connection to the goddess Aphrodite.
Conclusion
In trying to find an answer to the meaning of the bridal gesture
of the beautiful maid dancing with an ugly half-goat like figure, it has
already been understood that the question was a rhetorical one,
which required an affirmative answer, since the marriage here
represented should be interpreted as a symbolic one, between a
Nymph or, perhaps, a nature goddess and a supernatural being, who
through his ugliness expresses precisely his wilderness, and
therefore the free, great power of nature. The fusion of beauty and
ugliness, in this sense, was perceived by the Greeks as a fundamental
element in guaranteeing the perpetuation of the nature itself, and of
its components. Even the name “Pan”, according to Homer, who
narrates that the baby brought happiness to all the gods,33 recalls the
totality of the nature, and its powerful expressions.
In this sense, one could interpret the plaques coming from the
domestic contexts of the chora of Metapontum, on which our
attention has focused in the present paper, as depicting two
supernatural beings, probably identifiable as a Nymph and Pan, who
presided over nature itself, protecting crops, animals, and people at
31 Cf. Alessandro Cassatella, “Note sulla decorazione del tempio di Mater Matuta a
Satrico,” in Dalle sorgenti alla foce. Il bacino del Liri-Garigliano nell'antichità:
culture, contatti, scambi. Atti del convegno, Frosinone-Formia 10-12 novembre 2005,
eds. Cristina Corsi & Eugenio Polito (Roma: Edizioni Quasar 2008), 187-88.
32 Napoli, Museo Archeologico Nazionale, 11147, from the Casa dei Dioscuri. Cf. J.
74
This content downloaded from
157.51.107.190 on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:25:11 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Beauty and the Besast
75