Ludwig 2003
Ludwig 2003
Introduction
Theoretical Investigations
To determine the friction losses for the parts shown in fig. 1 respectively the
leakage flow rates through the sealing gaps the program uses differential equations
as well as simplified mathematically loss approaches. All calculations are carried
out on the base of a hydraulic design process considering common industrial
design standards in respect to the geometrical settings.
Volute
Considered Losses
Diffusor
• hydraulic losses:
Inner surfaces
of impeller friction losses
Sealing gaps deceleration losses
Outer surfaces wake losses
of impeller -===---fYf--W]",- mixing losses (Volute)
• mechanical losses
Fig. 1. Loss-causing components of a centrifugal pump
All the following figures which demonstrate the influence of the parameters
surface roughness as well as gap clearance show efficiency values 17 respectively
differences of efficiency values ,117 in per cent points and are plotted versus the
value of specific speed ns as defined in fig. 2 (where n is the speed of rotation, Q
the rate of flow and H the pump head).
Fig. 2 exemplarily shows the dependence of the overall efficiency 17 on the rate
of flow respectively pump size at constant speed of rotation (n = 1450 min-i). It
can be stated that an increase of the rate of flow leads to higher values of the
overall pump efficiency, which is the effect of an increasing Reynolds number Re.
The figure also shows that the efficiency values for very low specific speeds are
definitely smaller than for higher ones, which is due to the well known geometric
as well as hydraulic attributes of such types of pumps.
90
n
1%1 8S Specific speed:
80
so
I. 15 20 30 40 so 60 10 eo QO 100 ns
(min")
~
In the following:
,------------,
~ (A ~
i n = 1450min- 1 i
:
LfL,:,__~_~~1~J
I
~\
!~I ~
~
i/
"'-
mechanical losses
volumetric losses
/
80
eneclMl power
75
--mod,,"_
70 /
80 Volnl
551----------------.. .
'0 '5 20 30 40 SO 80 70 80 80 100
,......
nl
)
Q -
14SO~
!SIJ""/A ,
95..--------------------,
"
(%) 90
85
eo Surface roughness ks
55
50'---------------------1
10 15 20 30 40 50 60 70 eo 90100 Os
Imln"1
Fig. 4. The influence of surface roughness
~
Ii whole pump: ... < 18.5%
0
:I J\
whole impeller volute: ... < 5% casinQ: ... < 4.5%
~ ~
!l
outer surface inner surface: ... < 5%
~ ~ ~
20% 40% 100%
of outer surface: ... < 3.5°;' of outer surface: ... < 5.50/< of outer surface: ... < 6.5°;'
...--- -----...
--..
--
-OSmon
., ....... 07nY1'1
-O.8mm
---
·2
,3
...
'0 20 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Conclusions
The presented results show, that for single-stage standard centrifugal pumps
within a range of specific speed ns = 10 min- 1 up to ns = 100 minor (corresponding
to values from 520 minot up to 5200 minor in US-Units), the highest potential for
an efficiency improvement can generally be found in the region of low specific
speeds. All efforts aimed at an improvement of the surface quality of several parts
of the pump which are in contact with the flow cause a gain of efficiency. With
regard to the manufacturing costs which result from such additional surface
treatments the smoothing ofthe outer front and back shroud of the impeller can be
proposed as a cost-efficient procedure to improve the efficiency (cp. fig. 8).
Furthermore it could be shown that it is recommendable to reduce the clearance of
the sealing gaps to the smallest possible value in order to increase the volumetric
efficiency.
Example:
-
@
Pumps showing a
low surface quality '+
f;(l
(ks = 0,2 mm) i ~
Q = 180 m3/h
=
n 1450 min· 1
30 60 100
Smoothing Improvement of efficiency 1] in per cent points
Whole pump 7
Volute 5 1,5 0,5 0,2
Casing 4.5 1,5 0,5 0.4
Impeller inner surface 15 25 35 5
Impeller outer surface 6.5 2 1
Reducing gap clearance : 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3
_ _ _ _---J Low
Effort of production
It should also to be mentioned, that the conditions of the surfaces as well as the
sealing gaps within a centrifugal pump normally depend on the time of operation,
which means that there is a strong necessity to check these parameters at
reasonable intervals during the life time of a pump.