AP Seminar - Mock PT1 - Evaluation Rubric for Collaboration

FIRST – ASSESS YOURSELF!

YOUR NAME: Sahira Raj

**Highlight each score for your understanding of your own contributions.**
Component Exceeding Mastery (4) Mastery (3) Approaching Mastery (2) Below Mastery (1)
Content:
Preparedness Consistently came to class with Usually came to class with required Was sometimes not in class and/or Was usually not in class and/or
required materials OR materials OR communicated ahead missing required materials and/or did not missing required materials and/or
communicated ahead of time. It was of time. It was often clear they communicate ahead of time. It was did not communicate ahead of time.
clear they worked on our project worked on our project outside of sometimes clear they worked on our It was rarely clear they worked on
outside of class. class. project outside of class. our project outside of class.

Quality of Work Work was the highest quality, Work was good quality, Work was lacking a little in quality, Work needed improvement; several
demonstrating very strong content demonstrating a competent level of demonstrating some gaps in content gaps in demonstrating content
knowledge and outstanding effort. content knowledge and consistent knowledge or consistency in effort. knowledge with lack of effort
effort. applied.

Team Work:
Responsibilities Completed all duties assigned by Completed all duties assigned by Did not complete all assigned duties or Did not complete most assigned
the team in an exemplary manner. the team in a satisfactory manner. did so in an unsatisfactory manner. duties or did so in an unsatisfactory
manner.
Communication Consistently listened to all team Usually listened to all team Listened inconsistently and needed to Did not listen to team members
members and communicated ideas members and communicated ideas communicate ideas and opinions more and/or did not contribute ideas and
and opinions effectively. and opinions. effectively. opinions to conversations.
Cooperation Consistently helped team members Usually helped team members Sometimes helped team members reach Rarely helped team members reach
reach good decisions and completed reach good decisions and completed good decisions but needed to improve in good decisions and needed to
work through compromise, work through compromise, the area of compromise, thoughtful improve in the area of compromise,
thoughtful dialogue, and thoughtful dialogue, and dialogue, and consideration of others’ thoughtful dialogue, and
consideration of others’ ideas. consideration of others’ ideas. ideas. consideration of others’ ideas.

Justification of Grade(s) above:

I feel that I was on top of the content, but I feel that I needed to do better on the quality of my work and responsibilities in getting the
work done efficiently.

Modified from – © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc. (Biomedical Innovation Biomedical Sciences Peer Evaluation Rubric – Page 1)
 AP Seminar - Mock PT1 - Evaluation Rubric for Collaboration
Then, complete one rubric page for each group member you had.
***Your rankings for your group mates will have a DIRECT influence on their overall score. Be honest!
YOUR NAME:Sahira Raj
GROUP MEMBER: Pragya Ranjan
**Highlight each score for your group members.**
Component Exceeding Mastery (4) Mastery (3) Approaching Mastery (2) Below Mastery (1)
Content:
Preparedness Consistently came to class with Usually came to class with required Was sometimes not in class and/or Was usually not in class and/or
required materials OR materials OR communicated ahead missing required materials and/or did not missing required materials and/or
communicated ahead of time. It was of time. It was often clear they communicate ahead of time. It was did not communicate ahead of time.
clear they worked on our project worked on our project outside of sometimes clear they worked on our It was rarely clear they worked on
outside of class. class. project outside of class. our project outside of class.
Quality of Work Work was the highest quality, Work was good quality, Work was lacking a little in quality, Work needed improvement; several
demonstrating very strong content demonstrating a competent level of demonstrating some gaps in content gaps in demonstrating content
knowledge and outstanding effort. content knowledge and consistent knowledge or consistency in effort. knowledge with lack of effort
effort. applied.

Team Work:
Responsibilities Completed all duties assigned by Completed all duties assigned by Did not complete all assigned duties or Did not complete most assigned
the team in an exemplary manner. the team in a satisfactory manner. did so in an unsatisfactory manner. duties or did so in an unsatisfactory
manner.
Communication Consistently listened to all team Usually listened to all team Listened inconsistently and needed to Did not listen to team members
members and communicated ideas members and communicated ideas communicate ideas and opinions more and/or did not contribute ideas and
and opinions effectively. and opinions. effectively. opinions to conversations.
Cooperation Consistently helped team members Usually helped team members Sometimes helped team members reach Rarely helped team members reach
reach good decisions and completed reach good decisions and completed good decisions but needed to improve in good decisions and needed to
work through compromise, work through compromise, the area of compromise, thoughtful improve in the area of compromise,
thoughtful dialogue, and thoughtful dialogue, and dialogue, and consideration of others’ thoughtful dialogue, and
consideration of others’ ideas. consideration of others’ ideas. ideas. consideration of others’ ideas.

Justification of Grade(s) above:

Pragya always remained on top of all of her work and maintained personal accountability and made sure we were held accountable to
our work too.

Modified from – © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc. (Biomedical Innovation Biomedical Sciences Peer Evaluation Rubric – Page 1)
 AP Seminar - Mock PT1 - Peer Evaluation Rubric for Collaboration
Then, complete one rubric page for each group member you had.
***Your rankings for your group mates will have a DIRECT influence on their overall score. Be honest!
YOUR NAME: Sahira Raj
GROUP MEMBER: Abhi K.
**Highlight each score for your group members.**
Component Exceeding Mastery (4) Mastery (3) Approaching Mastery (2) Below Mastery (1)
Content:
Preparedness Consistently came to class with Usually came to class with required Was sometimes not in class and/or Was usually not in class and/or
required materials OR materials OR communicated ahead missing required materials and/or did not missing required materials and/or
communicated ahead of time. It was of time. It was often clear they communicate ahead of time. It was did not communicate ahead of time.
clear they worked on our project worked on our project outside of sometimes clear they worked on our It was rarely clear they worked on
outside of class. class. project outside of class. our project outside of class.
Quality of Work Work was the highest quality, Work was good quality, Work was lacking a little in quality, Work needed improvement; several
demonstrating very strong content demonstrating a competent level of demonstrating some gaps in content gaps in demonstrating content
knowledge and outstanding effort. content knowledge and consistent knowledge or consistency in effort. knowledge with lack of effort
effort. applied.

Team Work:
Responsibilities Completed all duties assigned by Completed all duties assigned by Did not complete all assigned duties or Did not complete most assigned
the team in an exemplary manner. the team in a satisfactory manner. did so in an unsatisfactory manner. duties or did so in an unsatisfactory
manner.
Communication Consistently listened to all team Usually listened to all team Listened inconsistently and needed to Did not listen to team members
members and communicated ideas members and communicated ideas communicate ideas and opinions more and/or did not contribute ideas and
and opinions effectively. and opinions. effectively. opinions to conversations.
Cooperation Consistently helped team members Usually helped team members Sometimes helped team members reach Rarely helped team members reach
reach good decisions and completed reach good decisions and completed good decisions but needed to improve in good decisions and needed to
work through compromise, work through compromise, the area of compromise, thoughtful improve in the area of compromise,
thoughtful dialogue, and thoughtful dialogue, and dialogue, and consideration of others’ thoughtful dialogue, and
consideration of others’ ideas. consideration of others’ ideas. ideas. consideration of others’ ideas.

Justification of Grade(s) above:

I feel that Abhi too was someone who stayed on top of his assignments and eas especially exceptional in his communication with the group and in
presentations.

Modified from – © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc. (Biomedical Innovation Biomedical Sciences Peer Evaluation Rubric – Page 1)