Unit 7
Unit 7
Summative Assessment
Summative assessment is a method of evaluating student learning, knowledge,
and skills at the end of an instructional unit or course. It is typically used to
measure the extent to which students have achieved the learning objectives and
to assess their overall performance.
Characteristics of Summative Assessment
The characteristics are stated below.
o Validity
o Summative assessment measures a student’s competence in a
specific subject matter in line with the learning goals and
objectives of the course or training.
o For instance, a science course will use experiments and other
practical tests to evaluate a student’s knowledge at the end of the
course.
o Reliability
o Summative evaluation is a standardized method of knowledge-based
assessments.
o It has well-defined processes that reveal the student's competence in
a field.
o These processes produce accurate and consistent results when they
are used in similar contexts.
o Practicality
o Summative evaluation has a flexible process that is practical and
scalable.
o It is well-aligned and this makes it easy for the instructor to
implement it as part of training.
o Ethical
o Summative assessment respects clear teaching and learning
boundaries.
o Before the instructor implements any summative assessment
methods in the classroom, he/she must obtain informed consent
from the students.
o Easily reported
o Since the key element of summative assessment is to evaluate what
someone has learned up to that point in time, it always ends in
having a concise summary of the outcomes of the assessment.
o This allows the teacher to compare the student's current performance
with past performances, external standards, and other learners.
o Variety
o Summative evaluation prompts students to exhibit skills and
demonstrate knowledge in different ways.
Here are some key advantages and disadvantages of summative assessment:
Advantages:
Comprehensive Evaluation: Summative assessments provide a broad
overview of student learning at the end of a unit or course, helping to evaluate
overall knowledge and skills.
Standardized Measurement: They often use standardized formats, making it
easier to compare student performance across different groups or educational
settings.
Motivational Tool: High-stakes assessments can motivate students to study and
engage with the material more thoroughly in preparation for the evaluation.
Clear Benchmarks: They establish clear benchmarks for student achievement,
which can guide future curriculum development and instructional planning.
Standardized Format: Often uses standardized methods, making it easier to
compare results across different groups and contexts.
Final Evaluation: Serves as a comprehensive review of what students have
learned over a course or unit, providing a clear end-point for assessment.
Disadvantages:
Limited Scope: Summative assessments may not capture the full range of
student abilities or learning processes, focusing only on what is tested.
High Stakes: The pressure associated with these assessments can lead to
anxiety among students, potentially impacting performance.
Infrequent Feedback: They provide feedback only at the end of a learning
period, which may come too late to address gaps in understanding.
Encourages Rote Learning: Can promote surface learning strategies, where
students focus on memorization rather than deep understanding of the material.
Risk of Misalignment: If not aligned with instructional goals, they may not
accurately reflect student learning or the effectiveness of teaching.
Less Flexibility: Typically does not allow for adaptations or adjustments during
the assessment process, unlike formative assessments.
Does Not Foster Growth: Unlike formative assessments, summative
assessments do not typically provide opportunities for student growth or
improvement based on feedback
Test
In education, a ‘Test’ refers to an assessment tool used to measure a student's
knowledge, skills, or abilities in a specific subject or area.
“A Test is merely a series of tasks which are used to measure a sample of a
person’s behaviour at a time”
- Garett
Classification of Test
(1) Completion tests :-In these tests are provided blanks that have to be filled in
by the pupils. These should be carefully worded so that there should be no
doubt in the pupil's mind about the correct answer.
Examples:-Fill in the blanks:
(i) a5/a3= ……….
iii) The square root of 1.44 is........
(iii) A triangle can be constructed when two sides and...........are given.
(2) Multiple choice tests :-The type of multiple choice test is composed of a
number of items each of which presents two or more responses, only one of
which is correct. It is regarded as one of the best means of testing, and is
definitely superior to the other types. It tests reasoning, reasoned understanding,
sound judgment and discrimination.
(Tick the correct answer or answers).
Example: They are always parallel straight lines:-
(i) Spokes of a cycle wheel.
(ii) Sides of a quadrilateral.
(iii) The path of two wheels of a cart moving on zig-zag route.
(iv) Opposite edges of a table.
(v) Concentric circles.
(3) Matching tests :--The type of matching tests consists of two columns where
each item in the first column is to be paired with a word or phrase in the second
column upon some basis suggested. There are many types of learning which
involve the association of two things in the mind of the learner; such as terms
and definitions, laws and illustrations, rules and examples, principles and their
use, etc.
Example:-Match the results with the conditions:-
Result Conditions
1. 45° Right angle
2. 180 Reflex angle.
3. 360° Straight angle.
4.90° Obtuse angle.
6. 450°
7. 270°.
Other similar forins are 'Yes', 'No': 'Right', 'Wrong': 'Correct' and 'Incorrect'.
Tests of this type are very popular with teachers. Their merits are apparent in
the case of construction, applicability to a wide range of subject matter,
objectivity of scoring and wide sampling of know- ledge tested per unit of time.
Examples:-Answer 'Yes' or 'No'.
(i) A book 8"x6" can be contained into a box 12"x4".
(ii) Two feet square is same as two square feet.
(iii) A triangle can be constructed when three angles are given.
(iv) Intersecting circles are concentric circles.
(v) Profit or loss per cent is always calculated on cost price.
(5) Short-answer tests:-
Here each item appears as a direct question. These belong to the category of
simple-recall tests. The answer or response has to be recalled by the pupil from
his past experience. It is differentiated from the essay examination primarily on
the basis of length of response or answer required. Testing can be made more
comprehensive with their help.
Examples:-
(i) Eight is what per cent of 64?
(ii) Two numbers differ by 7. The smaller is S. Express the larger.
(iii) Find the side of an equilateral A. if the perimeter is 36 inches.
Oral tests:-
Oral questioning is equally important for pur- poses of instruction and
measurement, It can be used with an individual pupil to probe his reasons for
his particular way of answering certain questions in other tests. It will furth r
help in knowing determining the causes of error. how well an individual has
integrated his knowledge, can apply it to new situations, sees its application,
and can hear, understand. think, and express with alertness.
There is no need of giving separate examples to illustrate these tests. Almost all
the questions suggested for objective and short- answer tests can be used for
oral testing with slight modifications here or there. But the use of oral tests is
very time consuming and highly subjective. It has also relatively little utility in
the class-room especially as a basis for determining pupils' marks in a course. It
is not equally fair and just to all pupils. Some shy students may not do so well
as they are capable of doing. It does not test extensively and perinits
interference and favouritism, whether intentional or unintentional.
In spite of all these drawbacks, oral testing is an absolute necessity in lower
classes and is a significant part of even the highest examination.
1. Validity
Content Validity: The test should accurately reflect the curriculum and the
specific content it aims to measure.
Construct Validity: It should assess the theoretical construct it claims to
measure (e.g., mathematical reasoning or critical thinking).
Criterion-Related Validity: The test results should correlate well with other
established measures of the same skills or knowledge.
2. Reliability
Consistency: The test should yield consistent results over time and across
different groups of students.
Internal Consistency: Items within the test should measure the same underlying
construct consistently.
3. Fairness
Equity: The test should be free from bias, ensuring that all students have an
equal opportunity to perform well, regardless of background or learning style.
Accessibility: Accommodations should be made for students with disabilities or
special needs.
4. Clarity
Clear Instructions: Questions and tasks should be clearly worded, with
unambiguous instructions.
Appropriate Difficulty: The level of difficulty should match the students'
abilities and the objectives of the test.
5. Comprehensiveness
Coverage of Material: The test should cover a representative sample of the
material taught, rather than focusing on a narrow range of topics.
Diverse Question Types: A variety of question formats (e.g., multiple-choice,
essays, practical tasks) can provide a more comprehensive assessment of skills.
6. Relevance
Real-World Application: The test should connect to real-life scenarios and
applications, making it more meaningful for students.
Alignment with Learning Objectives: Questions should directly relate to the
stated learning goals and objectives of the course.
7. Practicality
Time Management: The test should be manageable in terms of time allowed for
completion, ensuring students can demonstrate their knowledge without undue
pressure.
Feasibility: It should be practical in terms of administration and grading.
8. Feedback
Informative: The results should provide valuable feedback for both students and
educators, guiding future instruction and learning.
Timely: Results should be provided in a timely manner to facilitate learning and
improvement.
9. Engagement
Interest: The test should engage students and motivate them to demonstrate their
knowledge, potentially incorporating interesting scenarios or challenges.
By adhering to these criteria, educators can create tests that not only evaluate
student performance effectively but also support learning and growth in the
educational process.
ACHIEVEMENT TEST
An achievement test is designed to evaluate a unit during the teaching-learning
process. It has a great significance in all types of instructional progress of the
individual. It focuses upon an examinees attainments at a given point in time. A
class room teacher depends upon the achievement tests for measuring the
progress of his students in his subject area. It is very important that several
educational and vocational decisions about students are taken on their
performance in the achievement tests.
Designing a Test: Structure
1. Test Objectives
Purpose: Define what you aim to assess (knowledge, skills,
understanding).
Learning Outcomes: Specify the learning outcomes based on curriculum
standards.
2. Content Areas
List the main topics or units to be covered in the test (e.g., percentages,
fractions, geometry).
7. Question-wise Analysis
Analyze the questions based on difficulty, topic, and cognitive level.
Question Topic Difficulty Cognitive Marks
Number Level Level
1 Percentages Easy Knowledge 1
2 Real-World Moderate Application 2
Application
Conclusion
This structured approach ensures that test is well-designed, comprehensive, and
aligned with educational goals. It facilitates effective assessment while
providing clarity on content coverage and cognitive demands.
Construction of a Test:
Class: 5
Total Marks: 50
1. Answer the following questions: Total Marks: 1 x 20 = 20