1.El–Samahy2009
1.El–Samahy2009
1.El–Samahy2009
net/publication/255621651
Producing ice cream with concentrated cactus pear pulp: A preliminary study
Article in Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development · January 2009
CITATIONS READS
40 714
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Tamer Moussa Ayoub on 10 November 2016.
* Corresponding authors
E-mail: me505073@yahoo.com
E-mail: tamer1375@yahoo.com
Abstract
Red cactus pear (Opuntia ficus–indica) pulp was tested for some technological and chemical
characteristics. The pulp was concentrated up to 30°Brix then added at four levels (0, 5, 10 and
15%) to basic ice cream mix. The basic mix contained 0.5% gelatin, 8% fat and 10.5% milk solids
non–fat (MSNF), and 16% sucrose. Some of rheological parameters of both mixes and resultant ice
cream samples, in addition to some technological characteristics of resultant ice cream samples
were measured. The rheological properties of all ice cream mixes before and after aging showed
that the flow behavior of mixes is non–Newtonian besides being pseudoplastic behavior. While
specific gravity and weight per gallon of resultant ice cream samples increased by increasing of
added pulp, overrun decreased. Sensory evaluation of resultant ice cream samples showed that
sample with 5% cactus was very desirable and very close to control sample. This work shows the
possibility of producing a new product of ice cream using cactus pear pulp as a good fruit substitute.
Key words: Cactus pear pulp, ice cream, rheological properties, sensory evaluation.
Introduction
In recent years, the light has focused on foods rich in nutraceuticals and functional properties. From
this point of view, the consumer's trend has been toward foods with more natural antioxidants,
dietary fibers, natural colorants, minerals, vitamins, low calories, low cholesterol, and low fat and
free of synthetic additives, etc. While ice cream could be poor in some of these characteristics,
cactus pear fruit is one of the good natural sources of these nutraceuticals and functional
components.
Cactus pear fruit, which usually eaten fresh and could be processed into many different products
(Saenz, 2000), is a fleshy berry varying in shape, size and color and consists of a thick peel and a
delicate flavored juicy edible pulp with many hard seeds. The attractive color of the fruit's peel and
pulp varies between soft green, greenish-white, canary-yellow, orange- yellow, lemon–yellow, red,
cherry–red and purple hues (Gurrieri et al., 2000; Muñoz de Chavez et al. 1995; Saenz and
Sepulveda, 2001). These attractive colors due to being the fruit the main source of the natural
colorants betalains, betacyanins (red–violet) and betaxanthin (yellow–orange) (Fernandez–Lopez
The fruit pulp has high pH value (5.3 to 7.1), very low acidity (0.01% to 0.18% in citric acid) and
total soluble solids content (10.7°Brix to 17°Brix) which are mainly reducing sugars (glucose as the
predominant sugar and fructose) (Abdel–Nabey, 2001; Askar and EL–Samahy, 1981; Barbera et al.,
1992; Barbagallo et al., 1998; El–Samahy et al., 2006a,b; Gurrieri et al., 2000; Kuti, 1992; Parish
and Felker, 1997; Piga et al., 2003; Russell and Felker, 1987; Saenz, 1985; Saenz and Sepulveda,
1999; Sawaya et al., 1983; Sepulveda and Saenz, 1999; Sepulveda et al., 2000). The high pH and
very low acidity make the cactus pear pulp very suitable as substitutions in low–acid foods which
influenced by acidity like ice cream.
Cactus pear is a source of natural antioxidants (such as vitamin C, betalins, plyphenols, flavonoids,
and taurine) and also source of pectin and mucilaginous components (complex plysaccharides,
mainly composed of arabinose, galactose, rhamnose, and galacturonic acid), which have been
shown to serve as thickening agents and form viscous colloids (Galati et al., 2003; Kuti, 2004; Piga,
2004; Piga et al., 2003; Saenz, 2002; Saenz-Hernandez, 1995; Saenz et al., 1992; Stintzing et al.,
2000, 2001). The fruit has good content of amino acids, especially proline and taurine (Stintzing et
al., 1999a, 2001). Taurine (2-aminoethane sulfonic acid) is a conditional essential non-
proteinogenic amino acid and has been used in some treatments of many diseases and disorders.
Taurine widely distributes in many animal food sources, exception of cow’s milk, and is virtually
absent in the higher plants especially fruits (AACE, 2003; Cho, et al., 2006; Kindler, 1989;
Lombardini, 1991; Parcell, 2002; Stintzing et al., 1999a;).
Ice cream is considered as a food of high nutritional and caloric density. Commercially ice cream is
made from a mixture of milk and other ingredients such as fat milk, non–fat solids including
proteins, lactose, sweeteners, stabilizers and emulsifiers, in addition to flavors and colorants.
Although ice cream is rich in calories, it is poor in dietary fibers and some of natural antioxidants
such as taurine, vitamine C, colors and polyphenolic compounds.
The aim of this investigation is to study the possibility of producing a new accepted product of ice
cream using concentrated cactus pear pulp, and to evaluate the rheological behavior of mixes and
some characteristics of resultant ice cream.
Other Ingredients
Fresh buffalo’s milk (6% fat) was obtained from a private farm. Skim milk powder, gelatin, fresh
cream (25% fat) and sugar were brought from the local market.
Processing Method
The processing method used was as follows: the required amounts of skim milk powder was mixed
with gelatin and sucrose, and then added slowly to the liquid ingredients (milk and cream) at 45°C
under vigorous agitation. The basic mixes were pasteurized at 80°C for 10 minutes in water bath,
and then cooled to 4°C in ice bath. The required amounts of concentrated pulp, which already
pasteurized before, were blended with the cooled basic mixes in a blender for 2 minutes. After that
all mixes were aged for 24 hours at 4°C before frozen in an ice cream machine (Taylor-male, Model
156, Italy). The produced ice cream was packaged in cups (100cc) and placed in a freezing cabinet
at –18°C for 24 hours at least before evaluation.
Specific gravity of resultant ice cream samples was determined as described by Winton (1958) at
20°C. Specific gravity of ice creams was determined by means of filling a cool cup (with known
weight and volume), with the resultant ice cream and then weighted.
Weight of ice cream
Specific gravity
Cup volume
The weight per gallon of ice cream in kilograms was determined according to Burake (1947) by
multiplying the specific gravity of the frozen ice cream by the factor 4.5461.
Overrun of ice cream (%) was calculated as mentioned by Arbuckle (1977) by application of the
following equation:
Weight of mix Weight of the same volume of ice cream
%Overrun 100
Weight of the same volume of ice cream
Rheological properties
Rheological properties parameters of prepared ice cream mixes before and after aging (24 hours at
4°C) were measured by the Brookfield Digital Rheometer model DV–III at 5ºC. The Brookfield
small sample adapter and Sc4-14 spindle were used. The data were analyzed by using the Bingham
plastic, IPC paste and Power Law mathematical models to provide a numerically and graphically
analysis of the behavior of data sets (Hegedusic et al., 1995). These models are:
Where:
τ = sheer stress (N m-2)
Sensory evaluation
Sensory evaluation of the resultant ice cream samples was carried out by the staff members and
semi–trained panelists. Before evaluation ice cream samples were moved from the hardening
cabinet and placed in a freezer with a temperature ranging from –15 to –12°C in order to temper the
samples uniformly. Scoring was carried out according to Nelson and Trout (1951) for flavor (45)
and body and texture (30).
Statistical analysis
The results are presented as means, plus or minus standard deviation, from three replicates of each
experiment, except color attributes (10 replicates). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried
out to test the possible significance (p=0.05) among mean values of sensory evaluation using
Fisher’s Least Significance Difference (LSD) as described by Ott (1984).
Effect of cactus pulp on rheological properties of ice cream mixes before and after aging
Viscosity greatly influences overrun (Arbuckle, 1977; Goff, et al. 1994; Muse, 2004). So,
measurement of viscosity is very important to measure the effect of cactus pulp on characteristics of
ice cream mixes.
Shear stress (τ) was measured at different rotation velocities at different shear rates (γ) and
rheological parameters at 5°C before and after aging of all ice cream mixes. The obtained relations
were plotted in Figures 4a,b and the rheological parameters were recorded for all mixes in Table 2.
From the given figures, it appears that shear stress-shear rate curves were non–linear, which related
to non–Newtonian behavior. All mixes had pseudoplastic behavior either before or after aging.
Recorded results in Table 2. For all mixes before and after aging showed that consistency
coefficient, plastic viscosity, yield stress, 10 RPM viscosity and shear sensitivity were increased by
Table 1. Some technological and chemical characteristics of red cactus pear pulp.
Characteristic Value
pH value 6.14 ± 0.03
Acidity, % 0.05 ± 0.002
TSS (°Brix) 11.25 ± 0.2
Vitamin C (mg 100 g-1 ) 18.65 ± 0.3
Formol number (mg 100 g-1 ) 23.06 ± 0.4
Color attributes, L* 25.00 ± 0.7
A* 6.90 ± 0.3
b* 2.10 ± 0.1
Moisture, % 87.10 ± 1.2
TS, % 12.90 ± 0.9
Total Sugars, % * 86.85 ± 0.8
Reducing sugars, % * 82.98 ± 0.8
AIS, %* 7.35 ± 0.3
Protein, %* 5.26 ± 0.15
Pectin, %* 2.44 ± 0.2
Fiber, %* 1.44 ± 0.05
Ash, %* 2.27 ± 0.06
Sugar/ acidity ratio 224.07 ± 3.5
* Calculated on dry weight basis
Values are means ± SD (n = 3)
100
stress 80
Shear
60
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Shear rate
100
80
Shear stress
60
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Shear rate
Figure 4. Shear stress–shear rate curves of ice cream mixes with different ratios
of concentrated red cactus pear pulp.
Table 3. Effect of adding of concentrated cactus pear pulp on characteristics of resultant ice cream.
Ice cream characteristics Ratio of added concentrated cactus pulp
0% 5% 10% 15%
Specific gravity (g cm–3) 0.71 ± 0.08 0.83 ± 0.08 0.84 ± 0.065 0.86 ± 0.05
Weight per gallon (kg) 3.25 ± 0.30 3.76 ± 0.3 3.84 ± 0.3 3.91 ± 0.3
Overrun (%) 55.71 ± 3.75 46.67 ± 3.2 43.78 ± 3.5 43.11 ± 3.5
Values are means ± SD (n = 3)
Conclusions
This primary study shows the potential value of cactus pear fruits as a good natural source of energy
and nutritive components. Based on its low acidity, high sweetness, nutritive value and attractive
stable colors, cactus pear fruit may be a good suitable source of natural additives or substituted
Table 4. Effect of concentrated cactus pear pulp on organoleptic properties of resultant ice cream.
References
A.A.C.E. (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists). 2003. Medical guidelines for the
clinical use of dietary supplements and nutraceuticals. Endocrine Practice 9(5): 417-470.
A.O.A.C. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists,
Inc. USA.
Abdel–Nabey, A.A. 2001. Chemical and technological studies on prickly pear (Opuntia ficus–
indica) fruits. Alex. J. Agric. Res. 46(3): 61-70.
Arbuckle, W.S. 1977. Ice cream. 3rd ed. AVI Publishing Co., INC. Westport, Connecticut, USA.
Askar, A. and El–Samahy, S.K. 1981. Chemical composition of prickly pear fruit. Deutsche
Lebensmittel-Rundschau 77(8): 279-281.
Barbagallo, R.N., Pappalardo, P. and Tornatore, G. 1998. Chemical and sensory evaluation of
prickly pears concentrated puree. Industrie Alimentari 37(371): 745-749.
Barbera, G.; Carimi, F.; Inglese, P. and Panno, M. 1992. Physical, morphological and chemical
changes during fruit development and ripening in three cultivars of prickly pear, Opuntia ficus–
indica (L.) Miller. J. Horticulture Sci. 67(3): 307-312.
Burake, A.K. 1947. Practical Ice Cream making. Olsen Publishing Co., Wilwauke, WI., USA.
Cho, K., Kim, E., Choue, R., Park, M, Jung, H, Zhang, S. and Chen, J. (2006). Insufficient taurine
in enteral nutrition for patients. Nutrition Research 26: 450-453.
Egyptian Standard 2005. Ice cream. Es. 1185/01, Egyptian Organization for Standardization and
Quality Control, Ministry of Industry, Cairo, Egypt.
El–Samahy, S., Abd El–Hady, E., Habiba, R. and Moussa, T. 2006b. Chemical and rheological
characteristics of orange-yellow cactus-pear pulp from Egypt. Journal of the Professional
Association for Cactus Development 8: 39-51.
Galati, E., Mondello, M., Giuffrida, D., Dugo, G., Miceli, N., Pergolizzi, S. and Taviano, M. 2003.
Chemical characterization and biological effects of Sicilian Opuntia ficus–indica (L.) Mill. fruit
juice: antioxidant and antiulcerogenic activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51(17): 4903-4908.
Goff, H., Davidson, V. and Cappi, E. (1994). Viscosity of ice cream mix at pasteurization
temperatures. J. Dairy Sci. 77: 2207-2213.
Gurrieri, S., Miceli, L., Lanza, C. M., Tomaselli, F., Bonomo, R.P. and Rizzarelli, E. 2000.
Chemical characterization of Sicilian prickly pear (Opuntia ficus–indica) and perspectives for the
storage of its juice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48(11): 5424-5431.
Hegedusic, V., T. Lovric and A. Parmac. 1995. Influence of phase transition (freezing and thawing)
on thermophysical and rheological properties of apple puree–like products. Acta Alimentaria 22(4):
337-349.
Kendler, B.T. 1989. An overview of its role in preventive medicine. Prev. Med. 18: 79-100. Cited
in: Parcell, S. 2002. Sulfur in Human Nutrition and Application in Medicine. Alternative Medicine
Review 7(1): 22-44.
Krifa, F., Villet, A., Roussel, A.M. and Alary, J. 1994. New natural colorant extracted from Opuntia
stricta. Annales des Falsifications de l'Experties Chemique et Toxicologique 87(928): 183-192.
Kuti, J.O. 1992. Growth and compositional changes during the development of prickly pear fruit. J.
Horticulture Sci. 67(6): 861-868.
Kuti, J.O. 2004. Antioxidant compounds from four Opuntia cactus pear fruit varieties. Food
Chemistry 85(4): 527-533.
Lombardini, J.T. 1991. Retinal function. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 16: 151-169. Cited in: Parcell,
S. 2002. Sulfur in Human Nutrition and Application in Medicine. Alternative Medicine Review
7(1): 22-44.
Muñoz de Chavez, M., Chavez, A., Valles, V., Roldan, J.A. 1995. The Nopal: A Plant of Mainfold
Quality. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 77:109-134.
Nelson, G.A. and Trout, G.M. 1951. Judging Dairy Products. 3rd ed., pp. 255, Olsen Publishing Co.,
Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Odoux, E. and Dominguez, L.A. 1996. Prickly pear: an industrial source of betalains. Fruits 51(1):
61-78.
Ott, L. 1984. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Date Analysis. 2nd edition, PWS publisher,
Boston, MA, USA.
Parcell, S. 2002. Sulfur in Human Nutrition and Application in Medicine. Alternative Medicine
Review 7(1): 22-44.
Parish, J. and Felker, P. 1997. Fruit quality and production of cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) fruit clones
selected for increased frost hardiness. J. Arid Environments 37: 123-143.
Piga, A. 2004. Cactus pear: A fruits of nutraceutical and functional importance. Journal of the
Professional Association for Cactus Development 6: 9-22.
Piga, A., del Caro, A., Pinna, I. and Agabbio, M. 2003. Changes in ascorbic acid, polyphenol
content and antioxidant activity in minimally processed cactus pear fruits. Lebensm. Wiss. U.
Technol. 36: 257-262.
Russell, C. E. and Felker, P. 1987. The prickly-pears (Opuntia spp., Cactaceae): A source of human
and animal food in semiarid regions. Economic Botany 41(3): 433-445.
Saenz, C. 2000. Processing technologies: an alternative for cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) fruits and
cladodes. J. Arid Environments 46: 209-225.
Saenz, C. 2002. Cactus pear fruits and cladodes: A Source of functional components for foods. Acta
Hort. ( Proc.4th IC on Cactus Pear and Cochineal) 581: 253-263.
Saenz, C. and Sepulveda, E. 1999. Physical, chemical and sensory characteristics of juices from
pomegranate and purple cactus pear fruit. Annals of the 22nd IFU Symposium, Paris. pp. 91-100.
Saenz, C. and Sepulveda, E. 2001. Cactus pear juices. Journal of the Professional Association for
Cactus Development 4: 3-10.
Saenz, C., Vasquez, M., Trumper, S. and Fluxa, C. 1992. Extracción y composición química de
mucilago de tuna (Opuntia ficus-indica). Cited in: Piga, A. 2004. Cactus pear: A fruit of
nutraceutical and functional importance. Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus
Development 6: 9-22.
Saenz, H.C. 1985. The prickly pear (Opuntia ficu–indica), a crop with potential. Alimentos 10 (3):
47-49.
Sawaya, W.N., Knatchadourian, H.A., Safi, W.N. and Al–Muhammad, H. M. 1983. Chemical
characterization of prickly pear pulp, Opuntia ficus–indica, and the manufacturing of prickly pear
jam. J. Food Tech. 18(2): 183-193.
Sepulveda, E., and Saenz, C. 1999. Tuna anaranjada cultivada en Chile: Caracterización del fruto y
de la pulpa. Cited in: Saenz, C. and Sepulveda, E. 2001. Cactus pear juices. Journal of the
Professional Association for Cactus Development 4: 3-10.
Sepulveda, E., Saenz, C. and Alvarez, M. 2000. Physical, chemical and sensory characteristics of
dried fruit sheets of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus–indica (L.) Mill.) and quince (Cydonia oblonga
Mill.). Italian J. Food Sci. 12(1): 47-54.
Stintzing, F.C., Schieber, A. and Carle, R. 1999a. Amino acids composition and betaxanthin
formation in fruits from Opuntia ficus–indica. Planta Médica 65: 632-635.
Stintzing, F.C., Schieber, A. and Carle, R. 1999b. Cactus pear: A source of pigments and
nutritionally important components. Annals of the 22nd IFU Symposium, Paris. pp. 349-365.
Stintzing, F.C., Schieber, A. and Carle, R. 2000. Cactus pear: A promising component to functional
food. Obst-Gemüse-und Kartoffeverarbeitung 1: 40-47.
Stintzing, F.C., Schieber, A. and Carle, R. 2001. Phytochemical and nutritional significance of
cactus pear. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 212: 396-407.
Stintzing, F.C., Schieber, A. and Carle, R. 2002. Identification of betalins from yellow beet (Beta
vulgaris L.) and cactus pear (Opuntia ficus–indica (L.) Miller.) by high performance liquid
chromatography electro–spray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50: 2302-2307.
Winton, A.L. 1958. Analysis of Foods. 3rd printing. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.