E Hetttt
E Hetttt
The aim of the project focus on comparing column, beam and slab analysis result Analysis and design of
a solid slab, a stair case, shear wall, beams, columns, foundation and analysis of frames. and this enabled
to select the most economical structure, therefore we analyze the G+4 mixed use building using both
method. To analyze and compare the design results we have used ETABS software to analysis frame, to
calculate moment, excel to summarize calculated results and generally all formulas and procedures that
have been used are all done by refereeing different section of ES-EN 2015 code and published books,
Therefore from the analyzed result we have concluded and recommended from the two method by
comparing the dimensions of beam, column and slab depth needed to support the upcoming load and this
directly will imply the cost need to construct the building. The building is composed of solid slabs from
the ground to four floors. For the analysis of frames, the restrained conditions at the foundation level are
assumed fixed. Loads acting on beams from slab reactions and walls directly resting on beams were added
to self-weight of beams to find total load acting on beams. Those loads are so called transferred loads.
These were inserted and analyzed using ETABS 2020 analysis and design software.
Generally, the project expresses full and stepwise procedures that provide an excellent structural design of
multistory building.it include detail procedural comparison for the building located in Afar ,samara which is G+4
Guest house Building.
The document incorporates the design steps and results, reinforcement detailing of slab, beam and column and
ETABS 2020 analysis outputs and some excel tables are included according to the European Standards Ethiopian
Norm (ES-EN).
Chapter One
Overview of the project
1.1 Introduction
A building structure represents an assembly system that consists of components and their linkages.
Generally buildings are composed of architectural and structural parts. The structural part of the building
supports the body of the building preventing it from any collapse or failure. Therefore, structural design
involves the determination of the different sections of the skeletal part of the building to make it stable
and sustainable throughout its design life. A structural design is executed in such a way that the building
will remain fit with appropriate degrees of reliability and in an economic way. It should sustain all the
actions and influences during execution and use. Therefore, structural design focuses on structural safety
and serviceability with due durability. It must also optimize the cost expended in building the structure
and maintenance.
Reinforced concrete is the most widely used construction material in the world in the construction
industry. It is a composite structure of construction material concrete and steel reinforcement bars. It is a
concrete with steel bars embedded in it.
The primary objective of design is structural safety and serviceability. In case the structure fails, it must
be in such a way it will minimize risks and casualty. It must extend the time for evacuation of people
inside a building. This requirement of structural design is accomplished by the principle called ductility.
Ductility allows yielding of steel reinforcement prior to the collapse of the building. Yielding of steel bars
warns the start of failure of a structure or its part. Therefore, structures are designed to be under reinforced
by certain percent to assure ductility mode of failure if it happens.
1.2 Objective of the project
1.2.1 General objective
To analyze and design the building that resists different types of loads like dead loads, live
loads, and lateral loads (Wind load and Earthquake load).
To make the building design safe against familiarity and make serviceable until its design life.
To design a building which is structurally safe, serviceable and aesthetically pleasing to the end
users.
1.2.2 Specific objective
To apply the analysis and design principles of the new Ethiopian building code of standard(EBCS EN)
To analyze and make economic and safe design of roof, slabs, staircase, beams, columns, and
footings.
To show design result clearly using figures, tables and drawings details.
1.2.3 Scope of the project
The scope of the project is to design a G+4 mixed use building. It includes the activities like analysis and
design of:-
Footing
The structure is to be built in afar, samara university. This location is considered during wind and seismic
load analysis. We will also assume the soil condition of the area to determine the bearing capacity. The
area covered by the building is around 359m2 and its specific dimensions are:-
Height of the building=18.50m
This structural design is executed based on the Ethiopian Building Code of Practice (EBCS- EN). This
code follows the Limit State design approach. Limit state is a state beyond which the structure no longer
satisfies the design performance requirements. It consists of two states namely Ultimate Limit and
serviceability Limit states. Ultimate Limit states are conditions related with collapse or states prior to
structural failure. Its main concern is the safety of structure and people. Serviceability Limit states are
those associated to conditions beyond which a structure does not accomplish specified service
requirements. It is mainly concerned about the function of construction works, comfort of people, and
appearance. This structure is designed for 50years design lifetime.
2.1 Design Parameters
Concrete:- Concrete property for all beams, slabs, and stairs is C20/25 (fck=20Mpa) and for columns is
C25/30. The corresponding strength and deformation characteristics are shown below:
Stress and Deformation Characteristics of Concrete
C20/25 C25/30
fck = 20Mpa fck,cube = 25Mpa fck = 25Mpa fck,cube = 30Mpa
S 400 S 300
fyd =
fyk 400 fyk 300
= =347.83 Mpa fyd = = =260.87 Mpa
γs 1.15 γs 1.15
Es = 200Gpa Es = 200Gpa
Concrete 25
Cement Screed 23
Plastering 23
Porcelain tiles 27
Ceramic Tiles 23
Aluminum 27
Mortar cement 14
HCB 14
The concrete cover is the distance between the surface of the reinforcement closest to the nearest concrete surface
(including links and stirrups and surface reinforcement where relevant ) and the nearest concrete surface.
Nominal cover is designed as maximum cover Cmin plus allowance in design for deviation ∆Cdev. Cnom=
Cmin + ∆Cdev
Minimum concrete cover, Cmin, shall be provided in order to ensure: The safe
transmission of bond forces
The protection of the steel against corrosion (durability) An adequate
fire resistance
Cmin, Bonding
{
Cmin =max Cmin,dur+∆Cdur,γ − ∆Cdur,st− ∆Cdur,add
Cmin,fire10mm
Description of
Exposure Class Structural Members Affected
the
Environment Concrete inside building with low air
xc1 Dryer Permanently wet
humidity Beam ,Slab Column and
Shear/lift/wall.
Surface subjected to long-term water contact
xc2 Wet, rarely dry concrete
Foundation (Footing , Retained Wall…)
Foundation
Concrete grade C25/30 , ES EN 1992-1-1:2015 Annex E Concrete cover (assume for 50 years)
Cmin, b
{
Cmin = max Cmin, dur + ∆Cdur, γ − ∆Cdur, st − ∆Cdur, add
Cmin,b minimum cover due to bond requirement, see ES EN 1992-1-1:2015 4.4.1.2 (3)
Cmin,dur minimum cover due to environmental conditions, see ES EN 1992-1-1:2015 4.4.1.2 (5)
ΔCdur,st reduction of minimum cover for use of stainless steel, ESEN 1992-1-1:2015 4.4.1.2 (7)
ΔCdur,add reduction of minimum cover for use of additional protection, see ES EN 1992-1-1:2015 4.4.1.2 (8)
Foundation column
Cmin,b = Ø bar =20mm ( Assume Øbar for footing = 20mm) Cmin,dur =25mm(Depends on exposure class and
structural class) Recommended values for ΔCdur,γ , ΔCdur,st , ΔCdur,add = 0
Minimum cover for fire resistance, EN 1992-1-2:2014 Table 5.8 REI (60 Minutes)
1.5<ly/lx ≤ 2 , a =15mm
Max a = 20mm
20 ≥ Cnom + 12 + 16/2
Cnom ≤ 0
Hence,
20mm
25mm + 0 + 0 + 0
Cmin= max{10mm
Cmin = 25mm
But according to Article 4.4.1.3(4) for concrete cast against uneven surface the nominal cover should be at least
K1,mm for concrete cast against prepared ground (including bonding).
Note: - The value of K1, for use in a country may be found in its national Annex. The recommended Value
K1=40mm
Therefore use =40 mm (for Substructure like Foundation and Retained wall)
Footing (Substructure)
Structural class S4
20mm
25mm + 0 + 0 + 0
Cmin = max{10mm
Exposure Class Xc1 (dry or Permanent wet) Structural class need to be adjusted from table 4.3N
S4→S1
12mm
10mm + 0 + 0 + 0
The cross section being used for the design of beams is: b=300mm D = 400mm
D= 400mm
B=300mm
C1 C2 C3 C4
C5 C6 C7 C8
The column cross section applied for the design column is: B = 400mm H = 400mm
400mm
400mm
Panel Layouts
Foundation Layout
Loads and Load Combination
Structures are subjected to loads due to their own self-weight, live load and due to other unavoidable loads;
such as lateral and dynamic loads. The establishment of this loads which is acting on a structure is one of the
most difficult and yet important steps in the design process. The loads that act on a structure can be classified in
to three categories: dead loads live loads and environmental loads. Since the method of analysis is the same for
each category of loading, all loads can be combined before analysis is performed by the use of ETABS
software. However, separate analyses are usually carried out to facilitate the consideration of various load
combinations. EBCSEN provides design guidance for the structural design of buildings and civil engineering
works. It also provides
Methods for the assessment of the characteristic values of self-weight (dead load) of construction
elements
Characteristic values of imposed (live loads) on floors and roofs in building structures
Dead Loads
Dead loads are loads that act on structures as a result of the self-weight of the structure itself and components
that are immovable fixtures and permanent components remain stationary and relatively constant over time.
Examples of dead loads are the weights of the structural members such as beams, floor slabs, columns and
walls, the weight of permanent partitions, plaster board, roof materials, and ceilings and of fixed service
equipment.
Unit weights of materials taken from ESEN1992:2014 are used to compute these dead loads of the structure.
Examples for live loads are weight of persons, movable partitions, dust loads, weight of furniture etc.
Movable loads are those for which change in position take place over an extended period of time such as
people, merchandise, non-fixed furniture and equipment, stored material in a ware house and movable
partitions in an office building. The live loads on a structure can be obtained from ESEN1991-1-1:2014 based
on the function of building. According to table 6.1 in ESEN 1991-1-1:2014 Sec 6.3.1.1
FunctiOn Category qk[KN/m2] Qk
Load Determination
We determine the combination we were going to use. The combinations were as follows :
Chapter Three
A reinforced concrete slab is a broad, flat plate, with top and bottom surfaces parallel. It is used to provide flat
surfaces mainly for roofs and floors of buildings , parking lots, roadways and so on.
Slabs support area loads. The loads carried by slabs are of two types .These are live load and dead load.
Live load
Live load or imposed loads are loads on the structure are those arising from occupancy. They depend on the
particular function of the slab. To determine the live load on a slab ,we first determine its occupancy or
function.ES-1991 Part 1-1 Table 6.1 puts possible buildings occupancy in different Categories. ESEN-1991
Part1-1 Table 6.2 also gives the respective live load value for each category. We will take this are a loads and
place them on each slab according to their category.
Depth determination
In order to determine the depth of the slab, first it is needed to find concrete cover and effective
depth since total depth, D=effective depth (d) +Clear concrete cover+ Φlong/2
Where;
ρ- is the required tension reinforcement ratio at mid-span to resist the moment due to the
design loads (at support for cantilevers)
ρ’ - is the required compression reinforcement ratio at mid-span to resist themoment due
to design loads (at support for cantilevers) fck is in MPa units.
F3=310/as=(500/fyk*(As req/As, prev))
F2=0.8,for flanged sections where the ratio of the flange breadth to the rib breadth
exceeds 3. Otherwise; F2=1 for other cases.
F3=7/ leff,for beams and slabs, other than flat slabs,with spans exceeding 7m,which
support partitions liable to be damaged by excessive deflections (leff in meters, see Art.
5.3.2.2(1)).or F3=8.5/leff, for flat slabs where the greater span exceeds 8.5m,and which
Support partitions liable to be damaged by excessive deflections (leff in meters). Otherwise; F3=1
for both cases
Assumption: Initially we can’t know ρ and ρ’. So, let’s assume ρ=ρo and use equation
7.16a. As, req = As, provided.
l/d =k[11+1.5√fck (ρo/ρ) +3.2√fck (ρo/ρ−1)3/2]∗F1∗F2∗F3....𝑖𝑓 𝜌≤𝜌𝑜, 𝐴𝑟𝑡 .7.4.2 (7.16 𝑎 )
l/d =K∗N∗F1∗F2∗F3,where:-
N=11+1.5√fck (ρo/ρ)+3.2√fck (ρo/ρ−1)3/2 But ρo=ρ (assumption)
ρo=√fck∗10−3=√20∗10−3=0.447%
N=11+1.5√fck=11+1.5√20=11.71 ,
Cantilever 0.4 6 8
SLAB ROOF ANALYSIS
LX LY DEPTH D(mm)
Panel Type of
(mm) (mm) LY/LX Element K LX/d (mm) Or d+d’
Name slab
P-1 4500 5000 1.1 Two way End 1.3 155.2259 185.22594
3
P-2 4500 5000 1.1 Two way End 1.3 22.3 155.2259 185.22594
P-3 4500 5000 1.1 Two way End 1.3 22.3 155.2259 185.22594
P-4 5000 5000 1 Two way Interior 1.5 22.3 149.4768 179.476831
P-5 5000 5000 1 Two way End 1.3 22.3 172.4733 202.473267
P-6 5000 5000 1 Two way End 1.3 22.3 172.4733 202.473267
P-7 4000 5000 1.25 Two way End 1.3 22.3 137.9786 167.978613
P-8 4000 5000 1.25 Two way End 1.3 22.3 137.9786 167.978613
P-9 4000 5000 1.25 Two way End 1.3 22.3 137.9786 167.978613
C-1 1450 5000 3.45 One way 0.4 22.3 162.5561 192.556054
C-2 1450 3000 3.38 One way 0.4 22.3 162.5561 192.556054
C-3 1600 2000 1.25 Two way 0.4 22.3 179.3722 209.372197
C-4 1600 5550 3.47 One way 0.4 22.3 179.3722 209.372197
C-5 1100 7450 6.77 One way 0.4 22.3 123.3184 153.318386
C-6 1050 4500 4.28 One way 0.4 22.3 117.713 147.713004
C-7 800 5000 6.25 One way 0.4 22.3 89.6861 119.686099
C-8 900 5000 5.53 One way 0.4 22.3 100.8969 130.896861
C-9 800 3300 4.1 One way 0.4 22.3 89.6861 119.686099
D1, Depth for slab panel that maximum govern depth for all panel.
D1=210mm
D2=209.37≈ 210mm
DEAD LOAD FOR ROOF SLAB
Unit
Thickness Total load
panel Material weight Load(KN/m2)
(mm) (KN/m2 )
(KN/m3 )
Panels Dead load(KN) Live Load(KN) SLS=DL+LL (KN) ULS=1.35DL+1.5LL(KN) Design Load(Pd)(KN)
P-1 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
P-2 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
P-3 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
P-4 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
P-5 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
P-6 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
P-7 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
P-8 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
P-9 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
C-1 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
C-2 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
C-3 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
C-4 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
C-5 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
C-6 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
C-7 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
C-8 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
C-9 6.67 1 7.67 10.48 10.48
Moment Analysis by Coefficient Method
Moments Analysis For Individual Panels by coefficient method.
The two way interior panels can be designed using the coefficients method.
first stage of design to determine support and span moment for all panels. The support and span moments are
calculates as:
Mi=αiPdLx2
Panel Ly/Lx (KN/m Lx2 βsx,sup βfx,spa βsy,sup βfy,spa (KNm) (KNm) (KNm) (KNm)
P-1 1.1 10.48 25 0.056 0.042 0.045 0.034 14.672 11.004 11.79 8.908
P-2 1.1 10.48 25 0.049 0.036 0.037 0.028 12.838 9.432 9.694 7.336
P-3 1.1 10.48 25 0.056 0.042 0.045 0.034 14.672 11.004 11.79 8.908
P-4 1 10.48 25 0.039 0.03 0.037 0.028 10.218 7.86 9.694 7.336
P-5 1 10.48 25 0.031 0.024 0.032 0.024 8.122 6.288 8.384 6.288
P-6 1 10.48 25 0.039 0.03 0.037 0.028 10.218 7.86 9.694 7.336
P-7 1.25 10.48 25 0.066 0.049 0.045 0.034 17.292 12.838 11.79 8.908
P-8 1.25 10.48 25 0.0595 0.0445 0.037 0.028 15.589 11.659 9.694 7.336
P-9 1.25 10.48 25 0.066 0.049 0.045 0.034 17.292 12.838 11.79 8.908
Using the span length and the loads, we will calculate the maximum moment that will occur on the slab.
Mys=PdL2/2
To calculate cantilever moment we will take 1m strip as shown in the figure below.
1.02m
1.02m
Cantilevers are designed by taking 1m strip width along the short side of the element.
Mc = ½ Pd *l2
L – length
10.48 KN
1.45 m
Pd =10.48 KN
Mc =1/2(10.48*1.452)
Mc =11.017 KNM
Design Moment of Cantilever (C-3) & (C-4)
10.48 KN
1.6 m
Pd =10.48 KN
Mc =1/2(10.48*1.62)
Mc =13.41 KNM
10.48 KN
1.1 m
Pd =10.48 KN
Mc =1/2(10.48*1.12)
Mc =6.340 KNM
Design Moment of Cantilever (C-6)
10.48 KN
Pd =10.48 KN
Mc =1/2(10.48*1.052)
Mc =5.771 KNM
10.48 KN
0.8 m
Pd =10.48 KN
Mc =1/2(10.48*0.82)
Mc =3.354 KNM
10.48 KN
0.9 m
Length (L) =0.9 m
Pd =10.48 KN
Mc =1/2(10.48*0.92)
Mc =4.24 KNM
I. Simply taking the maximum of support moments of two adjacent slabs as common support moment of the
slabs . When differences between initial support moments are less than 20 percent of the larger moment
M 1−M 2
∗100<20 % where M1 is the larger moment .
M1
II. The unbalanced moment is distributed using the moment distribution method
MR−ML
If ∗100<20 % then take (MR+ML)/2 , MR>ML
MR
MR−ML
If ∗100>20 % then Distribute unbalanced moment MD=MR-ML based on relative
MR
stiffness…….. MR>ML
ML MR
MR>ML
KR
MD = MR− ∗∆ M … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … ..considering ¿
KR+ KL
KR
MD = MR+ ∗∆ M … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … .. considering
KR + KL
Support Moment Adjustment Between Panel Section 4-4:- for roof floor
9.55+7.85
MVAV= =¿ 8.7 KN.M
2
∆M 9.55−7.85
∗100= ∗100=17.80 % <20 % so here moment redistribution is not needed
Mmax 9.55
9.55+7.85
MVAV= =¿ 8.7 KN.M the same as panel 1 and panel 2
2
∆M 11.07−10.22
∗100= ∗100=7.678 % <20 % sohere not neded the redistribution ,
Mmax 11.07
10.22+ 11.07
Mav = =10.645 KN . M
2
Between panel 6 and panel 3
∆M 11.88−10.22
∗1000= *100 =13.97% <20%
Mm, ax 11.88
11.88+10.22
Mav = =11.05 KN . M
2
∆M 9.7−8.38
∗100= ∗100=13.6 %<20 % not needed redistribution method for panels
Mmax 9.7
9.7+8.38
We take the average between them, MAV 9.04 KN . M
2
∆M 9.7−8.38 '
∗100= ∗100=13.6 %<20 % it s also not needed the redistributoion method .
Mmax 9.7
9.7+8.38
We take the average of both of two moment ,Mav = =9.04 KN . M the same as above panels .
2
Support Moment Adjustment Section 2:2
∆M 7.55−6.21
∗100= *100 =17.75% <20%
Mmax 7.55
7.55+6.21
Mav = =¿ 6.88KN.M
2
∆M 9.98−8.41
∗100= ∗100=18.64 %< 20 % , not needed the redistribution method .
Max 9.98
9.98+8.12
MAV = =9.05 KN . M
2
∆M 10.4−8.41
∗100= ∗100=19.23 % <20
Mmax 10.4
10.4+8.41
MAV = = 9.4KN.M
2
∆M 11.07−10.22
∗100= ∗100=8.3 %<20 %
MmAX 10.22
11.07+10.22
MAV = =10.645 KN . M
2
∆M 11.88−10.22
∗100= ∗100=13.97 % <20 %
Mmax 11.88
11.88+10.22
MAV = =11.05KN.M
2
If the support moment is decreased, the span moments Mxf and Myf are then increased to allow
for the changes of support moments. This increase is calculated as being equal to the change of
the support moment multiplied by the factors. If a support moment is increased, no adjustment
For panel 2, as there is a decrease in filed moment, adjustment for field moment is not necessary.
But adjustment is needed on panel 3, due to the decrease in support moment In panel 3, Adjustment moment is
at the short direction.
FOR PANEL -3
Ly 5
= =1.1
Lx 4.5
Cx = 0.356 and Cy =0.22
∆ Mys=9.55−7.85=1.7 KN . M
∆ Mxs=0
∆ Myf =0.22∗1.7∗+7.22=7.594 KN . M
LX LY DEPTH D(mm)
Panel Name (mm) (mm) LY/LX Type of slab Element K LX/d (mm) Or d+d’
P-1 4500 5000 1.1 Two way End 1.3 22.3 155.2259 185.22594
P-2 4500 5000 1.1 Two way End 1.3 22.3 155.2259 185.22594
P-3 4500 5000 1.1 Two way End 1.3 22.3 155.2259 185.22594
P-4 5000 5000 1 Two way Interior 1.5 22.3 149.4768 179.476831
P-5 5000 5000 1 Two way End 1.3 22.3 172.4733 202.473267
P-6 5000 5000 1 Two way End 1.3 22.3 172.4733 202.473267
P-7 4000 5000 1.25 Two way End 1.3 22.3 137.9786 167.978613
P-8 4000 5000 1.25 Two way End 1.3 22.3 137.9786 167.978613
P-9 4000 5000 1.22 Two way End 1.3 22.3 137.9786 167.978613
C-1 1450 5400 3.73 One way 0.4 22.3 162.5561 192.556054
C-2 1600 2000 1.25 Two way 0.4 22.3 179.3722 209.372197
C-3 1600 5550 3.47 One way 0.4 22.3 179.3722 209.372197
C-4 1100 2250 2.05 One way 0.4 22.3 123.3184 153.318386
C-5 1020 5000 4.90 One way 0.4 22.3 114.3498 144.349776
C-6 1100 1990 1.81 Two way 0.4 22.3 123.3184 153.318386
C-7 1100 3000 2.73 One way 0.4 22.3 123.3184 153.318386
C-8 700 3300 4.73 One way 0.4 22.3 78.47534 108.475336
C-9 700 1700 2.43 One way 0.4 22.3 78.475336 108.4753363
C-10 700 3000 4.29 One way 0.4 22.3 78.475336 108.4753363
C-11 700 2200 3.14 One way 0.4 22.3 78.475336 108.4753363
C-12 800 3300 4.13 One way 0.4 22.3 89.686099 119.6860987
D1, Depth for slab panel that maximum govern depth for all panel.
Dead load
The dead load of the slab includes its own weight, floor finish and the partition load (the partition load
is considered as a dead load because there is a small probability of moving the partition in residential
areas).
The own weight of the slab is determined by multiplying the unit weight of each component of the
Dead load calculation: Some of the sources of dead load are shown on figure below and are the
following
Slab it-self
Design load Typical First- Fourth Floor Plan Load for Each Panel
D.Lpw=D.Lpl+D.LHCB
D.Lpw (kN)=(Hpl*Lpl*tpl*γpl)+(HHCB*LHCB*tHCB*γHCB)
D.Lpw (kN)=(2.7m*Lpl*0.02m*23KN/m3)+(2.7m*LHCB*0.15m*14KN/m3)
D.Lpw (kN)=1.242KN/m2*Lpl+5.67KN/m2*LHCB
But Lpl =LHCB=Lpw, L pw (kN)= )= Lpw*6.912KN/m* Lpw
D . Lpw( KN )
D . Lpw ( KN / M 2)=
Area(M 2)
Partition Wall .then calculating for each panel will give the result tabular form below.
The two way interior panels can be designed using the coefficients method .The first stage of design to determine
support and span moment for all panels. The support and span moments are calculates as:
Mi=αiPdLx2
1 2
Mxf=βxf*Pd*L2 x
Mys=βys*Pd*L2 x
Myf=βyf*Pd*L x
Panel Ly/Lx Pd Lx2 Bsx,sup Bfx,spa Bsy,su Bfy,spa Mxs Mxf Mys Myf
n p n
P-1 1.1 17.708 25 0.056 0.042 0.045 0.034 24.79 18.59 19.92 15.05
P-2 1.1 16.547 25 0.049 0.036 0.037 0.028 20.27 14.89 15.31 11.58
P-3 1.1 16.443 25 0.056 0.042 0.045 0.034 23.02 17.27 18.50 13.98
P-4 1 16.682 25 0.039 0.03 0.037 0.028 16.26 12.51 15.43 11.68
P-5 1 19.175 25 0.031 0.024 0.032 0.024 14.86 11.51 15.34 11.51
P-6 1 20.313 25 0.039 0.03 0.037 0.028 19.81 15.23 18.79 14.22
P-7 1.25 15.53 25 0.066 0.049 0.045 0.034 25.62 19.02 17.47 13.20
P-8 1.25 16.28 25 0.0595 0.0445 0.037 0.028 24.22 18.11 15.059 11.40
P-9 1.25 16.87 25 0.066 0.049 0.045 0.034 27.84 20.67 18.98 14.34
Cantilever slab moments calculation.
Using the span length and the loads, we will calculate the maximum moment that will occur on the slab.
Mys=PdL2/2
To calculate cantilever moment we will take 1m strip as shown in the figure below.
Cantilevers are designed by taking 1m strip width along the short side of the element.
Mc = ½ Pd *l2 + Pdconc * l
L – length
Mc =1/2(64.779*1.452)+(6.92*1.45) Mc =68.1+10.034
Mc =78.134KNM
Mc = ½ Pd *l2 + Pdconc * l
Mc =1/2(31.66*4.205)+(6.92*2.05)
Mc =80.96KN
Mc = ½(65.423*4.2025)+ (6.92*2.05)
Mc = 151.667KNM
Mc =8.25KNM
1.02m
MC =1/2(13.6401*1.04) =7.09KNM
1.1m
Mc =1/2(13.6401*1.21) =8.253KNM
Mc =1/2(13.6401*0.49) =3.342KNM
19.705KN
0.7M
Mc =1/2(19.705*0.49) = 4.83KNM
0.8M
Mc =1/2(13.6401*0.64) = 4.36KNM
III. Simply taking the maximum of support moments of two adjacent slabs as common support moment of the
slabs . When differences between initial support moments are less than 20 percent of the larger moment
M 1−M 2
∗100<20 % where M1 is the larger moment .
M1
IV. The unbalanced moment is distributed using the moment distribution method
MR−ML
If ∗100<20 % then take (MR+ML)/2 , MR>ML
MR
MR−ML
If ∗100>20 % then Distribute unbalanced moment MD=MR-ML based on relative
MR
stiffness…….. MR>ML
ML
MR
MR>ML
KR
MD = MR− ∗∆ M … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … ..considering ¿
KR+ KL
KR
MD = MR+ ∗∆ M … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … .. considering
KR + KL
support moment adjustment section 4-4 (for 1st -4th floor)
∆M MR−ML
∗100=¿ ∗100<20 %
Mmax MR
¿ 23.021−20.271
*100 =11.45% < 20%
23.021
So here moment redistribution is not needed. Simply wetake here the average Value.
M 1+ M 2 23.021+ 20.271
= =21.65
2 2
∆M MR−ML
∗100=¿ ∗100<20 %
Mmax MR
24.791−20.271
∗¿ 100 =18.23<20%
24.791
So here moment redistribution is not needed. Simply we take here the average Value.
M 1+ M 2 24.791+ 20.271
= =22.53
2 2
∆M MR−ML
∗100=¿ ∗100>20 %
Mmax MR
24.791−16.265
*100 =34.39 > 20%
24.791
I 1
Stiffness for far end fixed (Kp 4) = = =0.2I
L 5
DFP 1 =0
KP 4 0.2
DFP 4 = = =1
kp 1+kp 4 0+0.2
Panel -1 Panel -4
DF =0 DF =1
+24.8 -16.3
0 -8.5
+24.8 -24.8
∆M MR−ML
∗100=¿ ∗100>20 %
Mmax MR
25.63−16.3
*100 =36.4 > 20%
25.63
DF P7 =0
KP 4 0.2
DFP 4 = = =1
kp 7+ kp 4 0+0.2
PANE -4 PANEL-7
DF =1 DF =0
-16.3 +25.63
-9.33 0
-25.63 +25.63
∆M MR−ML
. ∗100=¿ ∗100<20 %
Mmax MR
16.3−14.86
*100 =8.83< 20%
16.3
So here moment redistribution is not needed. Simply we take here the average Value.
M 1+ M 2 16.3+14.86
= = 15.58
2 2
∆M MR−ML
∗100=¿ ∗100>20 %
Mmax MR
19.81−14.86
*100 =25> 20%
19.81
I 1
Stiffness for far end fixed (Kp 5) = = =0.2I
L 5
PANE -5 PANEL-6
DF =1 DF =0
-14.86 +19.81
-4.95 0
-19.81 +19.81
∆M MR−ML
∗100=¿ ∗100<20 %
Mmax MR
20.27−14.86
*100 =26.69> 20%
20.27
I 1
Stiffness for far end fixed (Kp 5) = = =0.2I
L 5
KP 5 0.2
DF P5 = = =1
kp 5+kp 2 0+0.2
DFP 2=0
PANEL -2 PANEL-5
DF =0 DF=1
20.27 -14.86
0 -5.41
+20.27 -20.27
Between panel 5 & 8
∆M MR−ML
∗100=¿ ∗100<20 %
Mmax MR
24.23−14.86
*100 =38.67> 20%
24.23
I 1
Stiffness for far end fixed (Kp 5) = = =0.2I
L 5
KP5 0.2
DF P5 = = =1
kp 5+kp 8 0+0.2
DFP 8=0
PANEL -5 PANEL-8
DF =1 DF=0
-14.86 +24.23
-9.37 0
-24.23 +24.23
0 0
∆M MR−ML
∗100=¿ ∗100<20 %
Mmax MR
25.63−24.22
*100 =5.5<20%
25.63
So here moment redistribution is not needed. Simply we take here the Average Value.
M 1+ M 2 25.63+24.22
= =24.93
2 2
∆M MR−ML
∗100=¿ ∗100<20 %
Mmax MR
27.84−24.22
*100 =13<20%
27.84
So here moment redistribution is not needed. Simply we take here the Average Value.
M 1+ M 2 27.84+24.22
= =26.03
2 2
∆M MR−ML
∗100=¿ ∗100<20 %
Mmax MR
23.02−19.81
*100 =13.9<20%.
23.02
So here moment redistribution is not needed. Simply we take here the Average Value.
M 1+ M 2 23.02+ 19.81
= =21.42
2 2
∆M MR−ML
∗100=¿ ∗100<20 %
Mmax MR
27.84−19.81
*100 =28.8>20%.
27.81
I 1
Stiffness for far end fixed (Kp 6) = = =0.2I
L 5
KP 6 0.2
DF P6 = = =1
kp 6+ kp 9 0+0.2
DFP 9=0
Pane -9 Panel -6
DF =0 DF =1
-27.84 +19.81
0 +8.03
-27.84 +27.84
Span moment adjustment
If the support moment is decreased, the span moments Mxf and Myfare then increased to allow
for the changes of support moments. This increase is calculated as being equal to the change of
the support moment multiplied by the factors. If a support moment is increased, no adjustment
14.98
p-3 13.69 p-2
12.4
For panel 2, as there is a decrease in filed moment, adjustment for field moment is not necessary.
FOR PANEL -3
Ly 5
= =1.1
Lx 4.5
Cx = 0.356 and Cy =0.22
∆Mys=14.98-12.4=2.58
∆Mxs=0
Table Summary of span moment adjustment for all panels in typical floor .
panel Adjustment
panel 1 & 2 NO - - - -
panel 4 & 5 NO - - - -
panel 2& 5 NO - - - -
panel 5 &8 NO - - - -
panel 1 &4 NO - - - -
pane 4 & 7 NO - - - -
Adjusted values
Reinforcement calculation
Fctm = 2.2Mp
fcd
ρ =¿)* fyd , where b=1000mm, and d=210-25-10/2=180mm
11.33
ρ =¿)* 347.83 = 0.00257
As min = 𝑚𝑎𝑥
{0.26∗ ( fctm
fyk )
0.0013∗bt∗d
∗bt∗d
………………………ES EN 1992:2015 Art.9.2.1.1 (1
As min = 𝑚𝑎𝑥
{ ( 347.83 )∗1000∗180=296 mm
2.2 2
0.26∗
0.0013∗1000∗180=234 mm2
=296mm2
= 0.04*1000*180= 7200mm2/m
Smax =400mm
b∗as 1000∗78.5
Scalc= , =169.7mm, use Ø10 c/c 160mm
AScalc 462.6
p1 Mxf 4.53 0.0009 106.48 224 4960 224 737.2 400 Ø10c/c400
Myf 5.12 0.001 120.57 224 4960 224 651.1 400 Ø10c/c400
p2 Mxf 2.48 0.0005 57.815 224 4960 224 1358 400 Ø10c/c400
Myf 2.76 0.0005 64.48 224 4960 224 1217 400 Ø10c/c400
p3 Mxf 4.53 0.0009 106.48 224 4960 224 737.2 400 Ø10c/c400
Myf 5.12 0.001 120.57 224 4960 224 651.1 400 Ø10c/c400
p6 Mxf 3.81 0.0007 89.243 224 4960 224 879.6 400 Ø10c/c400
Myf 3.81 0.0007 89.243 224 4960 224 879.6 400 Ø10c/c400
p7 Mxf 2.81 0.0005 65.707 224 4960 224 1195 400 Ø10c/c400
Myf 3.87 0.0007 90.785 224 4960 224 864.7 400 Ø10c/c400
p8 Mxf 3.71 0.0007 86.895 224 4960 224 903.4 400 Ø10c/c400
Myf 3.47 0.0007 81.397 224 4960 224 964.4 400 Ø10c/c400
p9 Mxf 2.81 0.0005 65.707 224 4960 224 1195 400 Ø10c/c400
Myf 3.87 0.0007 90.785 224 4960 224 864.7 400 Ø10c/c400
As per ES EN 1992-1-1, Secondary transverse reinforcement of not less than 20% of the
principal reinforcement should be provided in one-way slab.
fcd
ρ =¿)* , where b=1000mm, and d=210-25-10/2=180mm
fyd
11.33
ρ =¿)* = 0.000789
347.83
Area of steel required,
= 0.004*1000*180= 720mm2/m
= 0.0007*1000*170 = 126mm2/m
=0.2*126mm2/m =25.2mm2/m
Smax =400mm
b∗as 1000∗78.5
Scalc= , =3115.08mm, proved Ø10 c/c 450mm
AScalc 25.2
Chapter Four
Staircase is a structural member which provides vertical movement (circulation) between floors
of the building at different vertical levels. It consists of steps arrange in a series for the purpose
of giving access to different floors of building.
The type of stair on the architectural drawing is a quarter turn newel stair in which a well or
opening is left between forward and backward flight. The staircase is longitudinally supported. It
spans between supports of beam at the top and bottom of a flight.
In case of open well stairs where span partly cross at right angles the load on common area may
distributed as one half in each direction.
Check cracking
Check anchorage
Check laps
Riser = 15cm
Tread =30cm
Number of tread =8
Number of riser =9
In order to determine the depth of the slab, first it is needed to find concrete cover
and effective depth since total depth, D=effective depth (d) +Clear concrete cover+
Φlong/2
where
ρ - is the required tension reinforcement ratio at mid-span to resist the moment due to the
design loads (at support for cantilevers)
Or F3=8.5/leff, for flat slabs where the greater span exceeds 8.5 m, and which support
partitions liable to be damaged by excessive deflections (leff in meters).
Otherwise; F3=1 for both cases Assumption initially we can’t know ρ and ρ’. So, let’s
assume ρ<ρo and use equation 7.16a
l/d =k[11+1.5√fck (ρo/ρ) +3.2√fck (ρo/ρ−1)3/2]∗F1∗F2∗F3....𝑖𝑓 𝜌≤𝜌𝑜, 𝐴𝑟𝑡 .7.4.2 (7.16 𝑎 )
l/d =K∗N∗F1∗F2∗F3,where:-
N=11+1.5√fck (ρo/ρ)+3.2√fck (ρo/ρ−1)3/2 But ρo=ρ (assumption)
ρo=√fck∗10−3=√20∗10−3=0.447%
N=11+1.5√fck=11+1.5√20=11.71 ,
lx
=1.3 ⌊ 11+ 1.5
√ 20∗0.447 + 1 √20∗√ 0 ⌉
d 0.5−0 12 o .447
1
¿ 1.3 ⌈ 11+1.5∗4.472∗0.894+ ∗4.472∗0 ⌉
12
¿ 22.3
Where, L=4.2m=4200mm
⏀ 12 The effective depth d=4200mm/22.3=188.34mm
We have d '=cover+ =25+6=31mm
2
D =220mm
Design for flight 1 and flight 3
Table Dead load calculation
Material Thickness (m) Unit weight (KN/m3 )
Marble 0.02 27
Plastering 0.02 23
Pd =1.35GK+1.5qk=1.35*9.975+1.5*6=22.466
KN/m2 Pd =22.466 KN/m2*1.25m= 22.64KN/m II.
For landing part
A column is a vertical structural member transmitting axial compression loads with or without
moments. The cross sectional dimensions of a column are generally considerably less than its
height. Column support mainly vertical loads from the floors and roof and transmit these loads
to the foundation.
Notice:-
Design producer
The nominal concrete cover is the distance b/n the surface of reinforcement closest to the
Where;
In order to transmit bond forces safely and to ensure adequate compaction of the concrete, the
Bond Requirement
If the nominal maximum aggregate size is greater than 32mm Cmin,b should be increased by
5mm
Therefore; Cmin,b=20mm
The condition of exposure is XC1, which the environment condition is dry or permanently wet.
According to the exposure XC1 position of reinforcement not affected by construction process
exposure class will be reduced by 1class which is indicative strength class C20/25
The recommended Structural Class (design working life of 50 years) is S4 for the indicative
concrete strengths given in Annex E and the recommended modifications to the structural class
is given in Table 4.3N. But based on the above table the exposure class is reduce by 1 and the
According to table 4.4N values of minimum cover Cmin,dur requirement with regard to
Cmin,b = 20mm
Then; Cmin = Max {Cmin,dur = 10mm,Cmin,b= 20mm ,10mm Therefore; Cmin= 20mm
The value of ∆Cdev for use in a Country may be found in its National Annex. The
h’=30+20/2+10=50mm
h'
h= 50
¿
¿ 300=0.166 ¿
¿
Step 2: - Effective length determination
Effective length: a length used to account for the shape of the deflection curve.
It can also be defined as buckling length i.e the length of pin-ended column with constant
normal force,having the same cross section and buckling load. Determine the relative
Effective length, lo
3 3
bh 0.45∗0.3
Ibeam bottom = 12 ¿ = 12=0.00101 mm4 ¿
¿ ¿
3 3
bh 0.4∗0.3
Ibeam top = 12 ¿ = 12=0.0009 m m4 ¿
¿ ¿
3 3
bh 0.4∗0.4
Icolumn= 12 ¿ = 12 ¿ =0.00213mm4
¿ ¿
EI (Column)/l
=0.832
2∑ EI ( beam ) /l
K1= ¿ for top
2∗ ¿
l
EI (Column)/l
=0.934
2∑ EI ( beam ) /l
K2= ¿ for bottom
2∗ ¿
l
lo=0.5*l√ ¿ ¿
lo
√
λ= iI ¿ h 400
¿ = = ¿
i= A
√ 12 3.46=115.46 mm ¿
¿2493 ¿
¿
¿
λ= 115.46 ¿ =21.56
¿
Step 3: - Specify reinforcement range (i.e maximum and minimum reinforcement) provided.
=0.002*400*400 =320mm2
According to ESEN 1992-1-1, article 5.2.7 the effects of imperfection can be taken as:-
lo
2493
eccentricity emax = 400 = h ¿
¿ 400=6.2325 mm ¿
30= ¿ 400 ¿ =0.01333m
¿ 30=13.33 mm ¿
¿
Step 5:-first order effects:- action effects calculated without consideration of the effects of
structural deformation but including geometric imperfection first order moment including
imperfection.
20∗A∗B∗Cx 20∗0.7∗1.1∗0.7572
λlim,y= = =12.30
√n √ 0.898
20∗A∗B∗Cx 20∗0.7∗1.1∗0.877
λlim,z= = =14.25
√n √ 0.898
λ=
lo
i √
,i=
I
=
H
=
400
A √ 12 3.46
=115.46 mm
2493
λ= 115.46 21.59
=¿ ¿
¿
λlim,y=12.30< λ=21.59 , And hence the column is not slender we do not consider e2
λlim,z=14.25< λ=21.59 , And hence the column is not slender we do not consider e2
𝑖𝑓 ʎ≥ʎ𝑙𝑖𝑚…𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 (𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑒2 ), if not it is non slender
column(do not consider
second order)
Y-Y direction
mo1 13.65∗1000
eo 1= = =6.988 mm
nsd 1953.27
mo 11.54∗1000
eo 2= = =5.9 mm
nsd 1953.27
ee =max o .6∗5.9+0.4∗6.9888=6.33
0.4∗6.988=2.795 mm
ee=6.33mm
etot= ea+ ee=7.5mm+6.33mm=13.83mm
.
Z-Z direction
Nsd 1953.27∗1000
Vsd = = =0.8976
fcd∗b∗d 13.6∗400∗400
My 27.01∗1000000
µsd,s,y= = =0.031
fcd∗b∗ds 13.6∗400∗400∗400
Mz 85.20∗1000000
µsd,s,z= = =0.098
fcd∗b∗dsq 13.6∗400∗400∗400
h' b'
find ⍵ using = = =0.1
h b
⍵=0
⍵∗Ac∗fcd 0∗Ac∗fcd
As,tot = = =0
fyd fyd
⍵∗Ac∗fcd
As,tot =
fyd
My=Nsd*etot-y =1953.27*0.01383 =27.01KNm
Nsd 1953.27∗1000
Vsd = = =0.8976
fcd∗b∗d 13.6∗400∗400
My 27.01∗1000000
µsd,s,y= = =0.031
fcd∗b∗ds 13.6∗400∗400∗400
Mz 85.20∗1000000
µsd,s,z= = =0.098
fcd∗b∗dsq 13.6∗400∗400∗400
h' b'
find ⍵ using = = =0.1
h b
⍵=0
⍵∗Ac∗fcd 0∗Ac∗fcd
As,tot = = =0
fyd fyd
0.1∗1953.27∗1000 2
As,min=max =561.55 m m
347.83
2
0.002∗400∗400=320 m m
As,min=561.55mm2
Using ɸ20
561.55
µ= =1.788
π∗10∗10
Using 2ɸ20
Tie reinforcing calculation
Smax=min 20 ɸlong=20∗20=400 mm
Smax=400mm