SVC11
SVC11
improvement effort voltage quality in West Java - From surface data to bulk properties: a
case study for antiphase boundaries in
Area GaP on Si(001)
P Farin, H Eisele, M Dähne et al.
*hasbullah-elektro@upi.edu
Abstract. This study aims to determine the voltage losses on the 150 KV transmission line in
Cibatu and Mandirancan Sub-systems in the PLN APB West Java region. This study utilizes
the effect of the installation of Static VAR Compensator on voltage losses on a 150 KV
transmission line during peak load conditions. By knowing the characteristics of the system on
a channel that utilizes sensitivity to the addition of loads, the installation of SVC will have an
impact on the improvement of voltage losses on the transmission network. This study uses
simulations using ETAP software version 12.6. From the calculation simulation results that use
the actual data of APB West Java in the amount of voltage loss on the channel. While based on
the ETAP simulation results, there were improvements in voltage losses at Dawuan substation
by 13.56%. This proves that SVC installation on transmission lines can reduce voltage losses
in the Cibatu and Mandirancan Sub Systems.
1. Introduction
Electric power systems have to work optimally in serving loads that are volatile and the type of load.
The characteristics of the load greatly affect capacity and capability systems within transmit power.
Network configuration of a vast and growing also causes the operation of electric power systems
become complex and difficult to control.
In the planning and operation of electric power network stability system is an important aspect to
be considered. Power system must be operated with the aim of maintaining the channel power and the
voltage on each bus is at the limit of its operations. Change of reactive power is one of the causes is
not stable voltage in the system. For example not stable voltage and loss-power loss in the
transmission line. Loss-power loss on the larger system when the system is operating at maximum
load. On the conditions of the system can be stabilised by means of injecting or abortion reactive-
power condition, such as capacitor banks or equipment Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS).
FATCS working flexibly and directly usable for reactive power transfer which is very helpful in
the operation of electricity networks, performance power system can be improved by using the
FACTS, one of which with Static VAR Compensator (SVC). SCV is one of the most effective device
to increase the stability of the voltage and increase power transfer capability of transmission network.
For it should be mounted in place of the SVC that is correct with the appropriate parameters.
The purpose of this research is to know the characteristics of a system, so as to know the bus that is
sensitive to the addition of the load. From the bus SVC who later paired will correct the voltage profile
and influence on improvement of loss-loss of voltage on transmission line
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
2.2. Power
Power is the energy expended to do business. In the electric power system, power is the amount of
energy used to perform work or effort. Electrical power is usually expressed in units of Watts or
Horsepower (HP). Horsepower is a unit of electrical power which 1 HP 746 Watts or equivalent
lbft/second. While the Watt is a unit of electrical power which 1 watt has power equivalent to the
power produced by the multiplication of flow 1 Ampere and voltage of 1 Volt [2].
There are three types of electrical power, i.e. [2]:
Active power (Active Power) is used to perform the actual energy. The units of the active power is
the Watt. For example heat energy, light, mechanical and others–other.
P_3 φ = 3. V_φ. I_φ. cos φ
P = √ 3. V_L. I_L. cos φ (1)
Reactive power is the amount of power required for the formation of a magnetic field. From the
formation of the magnetic field then the magnetic field flux will be formed. An example of the power
that creates reactive power is a transformer, motors, incandescent lamps and other – other. Reactive
power unit is the Var.
Q_3 φ = 3. V_φ. I_φ. sin φ
Q = √ 3. V_L. I_L. sin φ (2)
Pseudo power (Apparent Power) is the power generated by the multiplication between voltage and
current rms within a network or power that is the result.
S = 3 Vφ. Iφ = √ 3 V_L. I_L (3)
The summation of trigonometric power active and reactive power. Pseudo power units are VA.
2
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
3
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
when operating or make changes to compensation no moving part of the SVC, setting the magnitude
of VAR and voltage is done by setting the magnitude of inductive reactive power compensation on the
reactor.
If the system load is capacitive reactive power or leading, SVC will raise the power reactor to
reduce the voltage from the system so that the VAR system down. On the inductive reactive
conditions or lagging, the SVC will reduce power reactor to raise the VAR of the system so that the
system voltage will rise.
The basic structure of SVC shown in Figure 2 which shows that the model of SVC is represented by
the fixed capacitors and reactors under control. Through a suitable coordination of capacitor and
reactor for reactive power bus, injected or absorbed by the SVC can be continuously varied to control
the voltage or to maintain the desired power flow in the transmission network through normal
operation or in the condition of the interference [7].
3. Methods
4
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
5
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
After the specified position then the next step is to replace the value of the SVC with the capacity
and then paired back on a troubled parent booths. Then, after mounting the SVC on May 23, 2017 at
18.00 do analysis determination of placement SVC at the most optimal parent booths.
Based on the flowchart attached research under SVC installation steps on the system are as follows:
Make a line diagram of the sub system IBT Cibatu 3-4 and Mandirancan 150 kV at ETAP
12.6.0
Place the technical data electrical data covering sember, the imposition of sub system and
conducting data input as a parameter on a system diagram a line sub system Cibatu IBT 3-4
and Mandirancan.
Run the simulation whether flow had power, can running, and observe the results of the
voltage of the system that had been in the running.
Attach the SVC on parent booths that have a loss-the biggest with a capacity of voltage loss
vary and do a running stream of power.
Checking whether there is a change in loss-loss of voltage.
After getting the big change data loss – loss of voltage, then do the installation SVC turns on
the entire substation.
Record the results change loss-loss voltage in each channel and determine the most optimal
position of the SVC.
Compare and analyse the major changes to loss-power loss from simulated results ETAP
12.6.0 before and after couple SVC in sub Cibatu IBT system 3-4 dan Mandirancan.
Finish
4.1. Loss-loss voltage in sub system 3-4 and mandirancan IBT Cibatu before mounting Static Var
Compensator (SVC)
Voltage loss loss on each rail on sub Cibatu IBT system 3-4 and mandirancang on May 23, 2017 at
18.00 GMT which will be discussed in this research is data loss loss voltage in a can from the results
of the counting loss loss voltage with the data profile the voltage is obtained from PT. PLN
(PERSERO) Area load settings (APB) and data on the ETAP 12.6.0. Loss-loss of voltage is shown in
table 1.
6
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
Table 1 shows the data loss-loss voltage in railroad that operated in kilo-Volt (kV) that is read by the
SCADA system PT. PLN (PERSERO) and at ETAP 12.6.0 after completion of power flow simulation
has started. Loss loss voltage in railroad are read either from PT. PLN (PERSERO) as well as from a
reading of the ETAP 12.6.0 value loss-loss voltage varies. The greatest voltage loss loss read by
SCADA system PT. PLN (PERSERO) is a railway in the parent value Dawuan substation loss-loss
voltage of 16.81 kV whereas the results of the simulation application SUITE 12.6.0 on parent booths
have the same loss-loss voltage of 15.369 kV with a value of error of 1.081%. Loss-the smallest loss
read by SCADA system PT. PLN (PERSERO) is present on the stem with a value of Indramayu
substation loss loss voltage of 1.32 kV while on the results of the simulation application SUITE 12.6.0
on parent booths have the same loss-loss of 2.278 voltage with a value of error of 0.648%.
7
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
Figure 5. Comparison chart-loss loss voltage by PT. PLN (PERSERO) and ETAP 12.6.0.
From the above figure 5, image errors or differences of readout loss-loss voltage read by the SCADA
system PT. PLN (PERSERO) and ETAP 12.6.0 error value varies, from the most minor error value is
present on the holding of a new substation Kosambi 0.154% or amounting to 0.21 kV and the biggest
error is present on the parent mandirancan substation of 3.178% or of 4.711 kV with an average
overall error in the reading of the voltage loss loss amounted to 1.066% or amounting to 1.599 kV
from the reading by the SCADA system PT. PLN (PERSERO). Error in ETAP because not all of the
components in the input into the simulation and components at the ETAP are considered new.
4.2. Loss loss voltage in sub Cibatu system IBT 3-4 and Mandirancan after the installation of a Static
Var Compensator (SVC)
At this time the sub chapter will be discussed regarding loss-loss voltage in sub Cibatu IBT 3-4 150
KV system on May 23, 2017 at 18.00 BST se5telah installation SVC on ETAP 12.6.0 program as it
has been in the know in the previous chapter that the results in the get voltage at ETAP 12.6.0 is the
result of power flow analysis using Newton-Raphson method with 1000 iterations, maximum
iterations and precision value of 0.0001. Due to the value of the number of iterations and the value of
the precision, simulation can run when power flow Sub Cibatu system IBT3-4 and Mandirancan
associated with the SVC is on rating-199 MVAR and + 199 MVAR. In its deliberations on this chapter
of the sub will be discussed regarding the influence of the use of SVC in increasing the value of the
operating voltage profile on each parent booths on sub-district 3-4 IBT Cibatu system and
Mandirancan 150 kV.
8
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
After Before
Figure 6. Comparison chart value loss of voltage before and after mounting the SVC.
9
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
The data in table 2 and figure 6 shows the varying voltage loss improvement on substation parent
starting from small improvements up to major improvements. improvements to the smallest voltage
loss loss exists in the parent post Suryaragi with improvements of 0.004 kV value before installation
SVC of 1.563 kV and the value after installation SVC be 1.567 kV and fixes the most there is in
substation Dawuan's parent with improvements of 1.106 kV value before installation SVC of 15.369
kV and the value after installation SVC of 14, 263kV. From the results of the rating value SVC
pemsangan-50 and + 50 MVAR at parent Dawuan substation there is improvement of loss-loss voltage
in sub system Cibatu IBT 3-4 and Mandirancan with the number of repair loss of 9.098 kV.
4.3. Determination of location and capacity in an attempt to repair the loss-loss of voltage on
transmission systems 150 kV system in IBT3-4 and Cibatu Mandirancan
As it has been explained in Chapter 3 sub 3.7 chapter about how to determine the position and
capacity or rating on the SVC on the ETAP programme 12.6.0 done by determining the initial position
of the SVC on parent booths, have the greatest voltage loss loss values and determine his capacity to
get the value of a loss-loss of voltage is not more than the voltage of 15kV supposed i.e. 150 kV in
accordance with the 1995 SPLN range 135 kV to 157.5 kv.
In determining the optimal SVC capacity in an attempt to reduce voltage loss loss-SVC is
connected on the Rails at the parent post Dawuan as parent booths that have the greatest voltage loss
loss values for the position was beginning, the capacity used by the author to SVC is registration-
199MVAR for capacity reactive power of the capacitor value and 199 MVAR reactive power for from
the reactor (-199 MVAR and 199MVAR) capacity value obtained from the SVC experiment results to
actual 4-on the first try with a rating of SVC registration-50 MVAR and 50 MVAR was enough to
make the system be on the voltage rating corresponds to 1995 SPLN, however the author try to the
maximum capacity that can be run by ETAP 12.6.0 with maximum number of iterations and 1000
value precision 0.0001 author a bold experiment 4 times with details as follows:
-50 and 50 MVAR
-100 MVAR and 100 MVAR
-150 150 and MVAR
-199 MVAR and 199 MVAR
As previously mentioned installation SVC value rating – 50 50 MVAR and already happening-loss
loss voltage repair and profile voltage is in compliance with the 1995 SPLN in vulnerable 135 KV to
157.5 kV with voltage loss loss-value the smallest is present on the parent mandirancan substation
with voltage loss loss-value of 1.763 kV and the largest loss loss value is present on the parent value
Dawuan substation loss loss voltage of 14.263 kV.
Table 3. Number of loss loss voltage on all substations parent Sub System
IBT Cibatu 34 and Mandirancan.
Operating (kV)
No Sub System Experiment Experiment Experiment Experiment
1 2 3 4
1 Cibatu 218,581 216,948 215,256 213,697
2 Mekarsari 215,951 211,934 207,447 203,916
3 Pinayungan 214,297 210,527 203,222 198,446
4 Tegalherang 214,246 208,394 203,121 138,398
5 Pruri 213,012 206,563 199,889 194,225
6 Parungmulya 211,956 204,801 197,523 191,686
7 Teluk Jambe 212,536 204,624 198,042 191,565
8 Honda 212,288 204,714 198,223 191,052
9 Maligi 215,201 204,553 197,577 191,509
10 Kiarapayung 212,107 204,546 197,713 193,482
11 Kutamekar 211,71 204,042 200,369 191,616
10
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
Table 3. Cont.
Operating (kV)
No Sub System Experiment Experiment Experiment Experimen
1 2 3 t4
Kosambi
12 212,301 204,748 197,848 191,738
Baru
13 Dawuan 211,506 203,452 196,641 190,701
14 Tatajabar 214,246 208,987 204,162 199,991
15 Jatiluhur 215,744 211,478 207,709 204,705
16 Indramayu 220,954 219,941 219,283 219,139
17 Sukamandi 219,331 218,726 217,085 207,342
18 Haurgeulis 218,852 216,7 216,333 214,683
19 Cikedung 218,837 217,398 216,21 215,232
20 Mandirancan 220,455 220,311 220,082 219,837
21 Jatibarang 219,398 218,052 217,645 216,679
22 Suryaragi 220,557 220,224 219,913 218,279
In the specify the location of the placement SVC in an attempt to reduce voltage loss loss-done
installation SVC with a capacity in accordance with the results of the determination of the calculation
of reactive power injection in the system. Mounting the SVC conducted done by pairing the SVC on
the Rails in a troubled parent booths (the rail has a value of voltage loss loss above 15 k V suit SPLN)
As mentioned on the previous sub chapter 4.1.3 for that matter at the time of installation SVC of
50MVAR and 50 MVAR all parent booths were in accordance with the standards of the SPLN range
135 to 157.5 kV voltage-loss or loss does not exceed with 15kV voltage loss loss-the biggest being at
booths Dawuan's parent with the value loss – a loss of voltage of 15.389 kV as for loss-loss voltage
smallest how parent booths at mandirancan with the value loss loss voltage of 1.705 kV
When viewed in table 4.5 when SVC is mounted on a 50 rating-MVAR and repair damages
happening MVAR 50-loss voltage in sub Cibatu system IBT 3-4 and Mandirancan. Improvement of
voltage loss loss-the best there is on the parent Dawuan booths with improvements lose power loss of
loss of 9,098 kV voltage loss before the SVC in pairs of 220.604 kV and after in pairs while being
211.506 kV SVC repair loss-loss the smallest voltage is present on the parent Suryaragi substation
with voltage improvement of voltage loss loss kV from 0.047 previously of 220.604 kV and after
installed into 220.557 kV.
In an experiment by pasting a value rating on SVC of-100 MVAR and 100 MVAR occurs repair
loss loss voltage better than ever are using 50 rating-MVAR and 50 MVAR repair loss-the greatest
voltage loss occurred at the parent post Dawuan with the improvement of loss-loss of voltage ' 17.152
kV of voltage-loss loss before installed SVC of 220.604 kV and after SVC in pairs into a 211.506 kV.
Whereas the improvement of loss-loss of the smallest there is on the parent Suryaragi substation with a
value improvement of 0.38 kV of voltage-loss loss before installed SVC of 220.604 and after the
install of 220.224 kV SVC.
On experiment installation SVC value rating-150 150 and MVAR, repair damages happening
voltage loss. Improvement of voltage loss loss-best happen at booths increasing value Dawuan stem
loss-loss of voltage kV 23.963 from loss-loss of 220.604 kV voltage before and after in the pairs of
196.641 kV SVC. And the repair of damages to the smallest there is voltage-loss at the parent post
mandirancan with a value of voltage loss loss-repair of 0.522 kV of voltage-loss loss before SVC of
220.604 kV was installed and after the install value SVC loss loss voltage of 220.082 kV.
On experiment installation SVC with rating-199 199 MVAR and repair damages happening-loss
statement significant improvements to the voltage loss-loss of the largest voltage still on the parent
value Dawuan substation improvement of loss-loss of voltage 29.903 kV of loss loss voltage before
installation SVC of 220.604 kV and after mounting the SVC loss-loss voltage be 190.701 kV. For the
11
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
repair of damages to the smallest there is voltage-loss at the parent post Mandirancan with a value of
voltage loss loss-repair of 0.767 kV of voltage-loss loss before SVC installation of 220.604 kV and
after mounting the SVC-loss loss voltage become a 219.873 kV.
Loss loss voltage in sub system Cibatu IBT3-4 and Mandirancan seen from the amount of the value
loss-loss voltage in each parent booths, each booth has a parent value of the voltage-loss loss variant
be but the author operates on improvement loss-loss voltage in sub system Cibatu IBT3-4 and
Mandirancan. From the results of the simulation in optimum installation get that SVC is present on the
stem Dawuan booths because the value of the most significant improvements in system of 29.903 kV
voltage loss loss or improvement of 13.56%
In the calculation of the manual on the SVC based on data P = 1300.836 MW 394.794 dang
MVAR then corresponds to the formula (2.3) the value of all the load power is 1359.412 MVA, so
they have a power factor of a load of 0.96.
Then thus so that the presence of power factor improvement required reactive power injection with
original power factor of 0.95 and the desired power factor 0.99 IE so that based on the formula (2.4) as
follows
0.317 rad = 16, 26o
and rad = 0.142 8.1 o
then
MVAR 196.42
So in experiments using reactive power injection SVC of 199 MVAR, because not too far from
capacity calculation above and also the value is the value of the maximum capacity of the SVC can be
fitted and do the iteration by ETAP 12.6.0.
When viewed in outline based on simulation results, show that the SVC can fix loss-loss of voltage
on the system effectively, SVC is placed as close as possible with the load, as for the reason for the
placement of injecting reactive power should be as close as possible to the point of requiring
additional power and placement SVC at the point load is preferred due to the effect of repair of loss-
the loss of her most high voltage
5. Conclusion
5.1. Conclusion
Referring to the findings and discussion in the previous chapter, there are several conclusions that can
be taken. As for the summary is as follows:
Loss loss voltage before installation of Static VAR Compensator in Sub 3-4 and IBT Cibatu
System Mandirancan on reading by the SCADA system PT. PLN (PERSERO) of 224.71 kV
and on simulations of ETAP 12.6.0 of 220.604 kV with an error in the reading of the SCADA
system PT. PLN (PERSERO) and simulation result ETAP 12.6.0 amounted to 1.066%
loss of voltage after the installation of a Static VAR Compensator using simulated ETAP
12.6.0 on the first try with a rating of 50-50 and MVAR loss loss voltage on sub system 3-4
and IBT Cibatu Madirancan be 211.506 kV or no improvement of 9.098 kV, in a second
experiment with rating-100 MVAR and 100 MVAR loss-loss voltage in sub system 3-4 and
IBT Cibatu Madirancan be 203.425 kV or no improvement of 17.152 kV, in a third
experiment with rating-150 150 and MVAR loss-loss the voltage on the sub system 3-4 and
IBT Cibatu Madirancan be 196.641 kV or no improvement of 23.963 kV and the fourth
experiment with the value of the rating-199 199 MVAR and loss-loss voltage in sub system 3-
4 and IBT Cibatu Madirancan be 190.701 kV or is there an improvement of 29.903 kV
refer to the results of research in the previous chapter that the optimal placement of the
installation Static VAR Compensator in the Sub 3-4 Mandirancan IBT Cibatu System is
present on the mains Substation Dawuan with improvement of loss-loss of voltage 29.903 kV
or amounted to 13.56%
12
4th Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402 (2019) 033076 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033076
References
[1] Sudirham S 2012 Analisis sistem tenaga (Bandung: Darpublic)
[2] Panglo S and Bakri H 2014 Menggunakan Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) Dengan
Software Neplan (Universitas Hasanuddin)
[3] PLN 2014 ROT PT. PLN (Persero)
[4] Stevenson W D 1983 Analisa sistem tenaga listrik (Jakarta: Erlangga)
[5] Saadat H 1999 Power system analysis (New York: Mc Graw-Hill)
[6] Ardi M A Bin 2013 Power Factor Improvement In Power System With The Integration Of
Renewable Energy (University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia)
[7] Abidin Z, Hadi S P and Sarjiya S 2014 dampak pemasangan peralatan FACTS terhadap
stablitas tegangan padasistem tenaga listrik Transmisi 16 (3) 147-153
[8] Gyugyi L 1988 Power electronics in electric utilities: Static VAR compensators Proceedings of
the IEEE 76 (4) 483-494
[9] Hastanto A and Yuningtyastuti I 2012 Optimasi Penempatan SVC Untuk Memperbaiki Profil
Tegangan Pada Sistem 500 kV Jamali Menggunakan Metode Particle Swarm Optimization
(PSO) (Teknik Elektro Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro)
13