data driven approach
data driven approach
Review
A Survey on Data-Driven Approaches for Reliability, Robustness,
and Energy Efficiency in Wireless Body Area Networks
Pulak Majumdar 1 , Satyaki Roy 2 , Sudipta Sikdar 3 , Preetam Ghosh 4 and Nirnay Ghosh 1, *
1 Department of Computer Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology,
Shibpur, Howrah 711103, India; 2022csm007.pulak@students.iiests.ac.in
2 Department of Mathematics, University of Alabama, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA; sr0215@uah.edu
3 Department of Computer Science and Technology & Computer Science and Information Technology,
University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata 700160, India; sudipta.sikdar@uem.edu.in
4 Department of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA;
pghosh@vcu.edu
* Correspondence: nirnay@cs.iiests.ac.in
Abstract: Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) are pivotal in health care and wearable tech-
nologies, enabling seamless communication between miniature sensors and devices on or within
the human body. These biosensors capture critical physiological parameters, ranging from body
temperature and blood oxygen levels to real-time electrocardiogram readings. However, WBANs
face significant challenges during and after deployment, including energy conservation, security,
reliability, and failure vulnerability. Sensor nodes, which are often battery-operated, expend consider-
able energy during sensing and transmission due to inherent spatiotemporal patterns in biomedical
data streams. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of data-driven approaches that address
these challenges, focusing on device placement and routing, sampling rate calibration, and the
application of machine learning (ML) and statistical learning techniques to enhance network perfor-
mance. Additionally, we validate three existing models (statistical, ML, and coding-based models)
using two real datasets, namely the MIMIC clinical database and biomarkers collected from six
subjects with a prototype biosensing device developed by our team. Our findings offer insights
into strategies for optimizing energy efficiency while ensuring security and reliability in WBANs.
Citation: Majumdar, P.; Roy, S.; Sikdar,
We conclude by outlining future directions to leverage approaches to meet the evolving demands of
S.; Ghosh, P.; Ghosh, N. A Survey on
healthcare applications.
Data-Driven Approaches for
Reliability, Robustness, and Energy
Keywords: wireless body area networks; wearable biosensors; photoplethysmography; redundancy;
Efficiency in Wireless Body Area
Networks. Sensors 2024, 24, 6531.
energy efficiency; robustness; machine learning
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24206531
ensure the delivery of critical information, even in the presence of interference or packet loss,
thereby contributing to network robustness. Thirdly, in scenarios involving heterogeneous
wireless networking technologies, redundancy provides added reliability. Data replication
across multiple paths ensures seamless network functionality, even when individual links
fail. Lastly, redundant security measures, including multiple layers of authentication and
encryption, enhance data protection. Lastly, redundant data storage and transmission
mechanisms safeguard against potential security breaches or data corruption.
We provide a comprehensive survey, encompassing an in-depth review of data-driven
approaches aimed at enhancing energy efficiency, security, reliability, and robustness to
failures (see Figure 1a). We explore various device placement and routing approaches that
leverage these patterns to optimize network performance. Furthermore, we delve into exist-
ing strategies for calibrating sampling rates, as well as the application of machine learning
(ML) and statistical learning techniques in WBANs, highlighting their contributions to the
efficient, secure, and reliable operation of these time-critical WBAN applications.
(a) (b)
Figure 1. Spatiotemporal data correlation in wireless body area networks (WBANs). (a) Effect of
redundancy on security, reliability, robustness, and energy efficiency. (b) System model showing the
communication among sensors, coordinator nodes, and access points.
• Coordinator or personal devices serve as a central hub for collecting signals from sensors
and forwarding information to recipients such as physicians, cloud services, or external
devices. For experimental validation (discussed in Section 4), we treat the coordination
node as the base station (BS).
• Sensors are the primary components responsible for acquiring physiological param-
eters from the body. They can measure various health parameters, environmental
conditions, and biokinetics. Sensors are deployed in diverse locations, such as wrist-
watches, smartphones, and various body parts.
• Actuators perform specific actions based on data received from sensor nodes, returning
feedback by executing tasks such as administering medicine or adjusting glucose
levels in response to sensor data.
IEEE 802.15.6 [18,19] presents another categorization based on sensor node placement
on or within the human body, distinguishing between implant, body-surface, and external
nodes. IEEE 802.15.6 defines key specifications for wireless body area networks (WBANs)
to ensure efficient and reliable communication in medical and non-medical applications.
The bit rate must range between 10 kbps and 10 Mbps, supporting a maximum of 256 nodes
per network. The packet error rate (PER) should remain under 10% in approximately
95% of the best-performing links, while node join and leave operations must occur in less
than 3 s. To maintain reliable communication, even with mobile nodes, the maximum
tolerable latency is 125 ms for medical applications and 250 ms for non-medical applications,
with jitter limited to 50 ms. Additionally, WBANs should comply with a Specific Absorption
Rate (SAR) of 1.6 W/kg in 1 g of body tissue, with devices transmitting at 0.1 mW and
a maximum transmission power of 1.0 mW. WBANs must also support interoperability
between devices following different standards and be capable of power-saving operations
while ensuring priority services and self-healing capabilities for quality of service (QoS).
3. Methodologies
The surveyed methodologies (summarized in Figure 2) utilize approaches such as
(1) energy saving and robustness maximization, (2) intelligent node placement and route
selection, (3) sampling-rate calibration, and (4) coding-based techniques to achieve the
following optimization goals.
Figure 2. Summary of methodologies surveyed based on different optimization goals and approaches.
and communication load across the network, ensuring resource efficiency, and pre-
venting overload on specific components. The studies in this category investigate
how data-driven mechanisms contribute to effective load balancing in WBANs. Top-
ics include dynamic resource allocation, task offloading, and adaptive strategies to
maintain an even distribution of network resources based on real-time data.
• QoS (Energy Efficiency and Robustness). Quality of service (QoS) is essential for the suc-
cess of WBANs, particularly in healthcare applications requiring real-time monitoring.
State-of-the-art approaches significantly enhance QoS by improving the robustness of
data transmission and ensuring overall network reliability. Reliability, in this context,
refers to the network’s ability to withstand and overcome faults, including energy de-
pletion of nodes and network failures arising from human mobility. These approaches
safeguard against potential disruptions and facilitate patient mobility, particularly
when patients move beyond Wi-Fi network coverage [20].
(a) (b)
Figure 3. Energy efficiency and strategic node placement in WBANs. (a) Communication of an
implant WBAN with the wireless access point. (b) Energy-efficient protocols for biosensor networks.
(This figure was redrawn from [35]).
to designate cluster heads, which act as relay nodes for the transmission of messages
from surrounding sensor nodes to the base station. By utilizing probability distribution,
specific energy, network density, and distance from base stations, this method optimizes
the selection of cluster heads. Simulations revealed that this approach increases network
lifetime and decreases end-to-end delay compared to the LEACH protocol [40].
Shukla et al. presented an energy-efficient solution for hub node placement in WBANs,
using the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) to find the optimal location for the central
hub. The WOA minimizes the energy spent by biosensor nodes by reducing the need for
multiple trial-and-error placements, speeding up the process compared to traditional meth-
ods. The algorithm leverages a population of candidate solutions, or “whale search agents”,
that iteratively converge on the best hub location with minimal network energy consump-
tion [41]. Patra et al. proposed a Free Search Krill Herd (FSKH) algorithm for optimization
of relay node placement in WBANs, focusing on energy efficiency. They complemented this
with a routing protocol based on the Harmony Search (HS) algorithm, further improving
the reliability and energy conservation of data transmission [42]. Lastly, other studies
have addressed the joint challenge of security and energy-efficient routing. One approach
aims to secure data transmission using particle swarm optimization for the selection of the
next hop [43]. Similarly, an optimization-based framework aims to improve throughput,
prolong node lifetime, and minimize redundancy through synchronized communication
and a handover mechanism among the coordinator nodes (CNs). Specifically, two-hop
communication was enforced to minimize packet drops under worst-case scenarios where
the communicating node is outside the range of the CNs [44].
low variation and high redundancy, mitigating energy loss from excessive data transmis-
sion. It categorizes sensor nodes based on data significance, enabling network balancing
and responsive emergency measures. A selection algorithm for cooperative nodes in multi-
hop communication considers residual energy, congestion control, and signal-to-noise ratio
to optimize QoS. This approach demonstrates significant improvements in QoS, surpassing
existing state-of-the-art methods.
4. Experimental Validation
We discuss the study design and implementation specifications, followed by a perfor-
mance evaluation of the three baselines to optimize WBAN communication. The experi-
ments are designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of data-driven approaches by incor-
porating machine learning, statistical methods, and coding-based techniques to address
key challenges in WBANs, such as reliability (measured in terms of predictive accuracy of
significant events) and quality of service (in terms of data loss and communication delay).
HbO2
SpO2 = × 100%
Hb + HbO2
Oximetry devices utilize red and infrared LEDs in conjunction with photosensors to
gauge the light intensity passing through fingertips. This intensity reduction is attributed
to blood flow in veins, arteries, and tissues. Venous blood flow and tissue generate a
stable DC signal, while arterial blood flow results in a less stable AC signal. The ratio of
ACred /DCred
red-to-infrared light absorption producing AC and DC components is R = AC ,
ired /DCired
where ACred , DCred , ACired , and DCired are the AC and DC voltages from the absorption of
red and infrared light, respectively. Lastly, given the voltage ratio (R) resulting from the
absorption of red and infrared light (ACred ), SpO2 is SpO2 = 10 − 25R.
The portable healthcare system utilizes an IC MAX30100 oximetry sensor to monitor
health indicators. This integrated module features red and infrared LEDs, alongside signal
conditioning components, all housed within a single package. By capturing voltage,
the sensor module calculates SpO2 levels and detects pulses. A schematic representation of
the sensor module is shown in Figure 4a. The MAX30100 sensor module (manufactured by
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., a subsidiary of Analog Devices) positioned on thin body
tissues like a fingertip, employs alternating red and infrared light from its second LED.
This light is emitted onto the fingertip, where some is absorbed and reflected. The reflected
light is detected by the photodiode on the IC MAX30100, generating a voltage that is
transmitted to the integrated signal conditioner within the IC MAX30100. The resulting
signal from the MAX30100 sensor module is conveyed to the XIAO ESP32-S3 using the I2C
communication protocol. The system implemented for this study comprises the following
open-source electronic components:
1. ESP32-S3 microcontroller: A cost-efficient tiny development board with dimensions of
21 mm × 17.5 mm, featuring Wi-Fi and Bluetooth capabilities and designed around
the ESP32-S3 microcontroller. With 11 general-purpose input/output pins, support
for interrupt/PWM/I2C/one-wire (except A0), and a single analog input (3.3 V
max), it provides versatile functionality. The microcontroller is compatible with
MicroPython, Arduino, and ESP-IDF, boasting a clock speed of up to 240 MHz, 8 MB
PS-RAM, and 8 Mbytes of Flash storage. This device can be powered via a micro
USB connection, accepting a 5 V input. Leveraging its Wi-Fi capabilities, the Seed
Studio XIAO ESP32S3 facilitates the creation of applications for wireless data transfer
to cloud infrastructure.
2. MAX30100 pulse oximeter module: With dimensions of 19 mm × 14.5 mm × 3 mm,
this module is capable of embedding pulse oximetry and heart rate monitoring
applications. Comprising two LEDs and a low-noise analog signal processing unit,
it calculates heart rate and SpO2 measurements using raw sensor data. Operating
within a range of 1.8 V to 3.3 V, the sensor module includes an inbuilt voltage regulator.
Equipped with a photo sensor, red LED (660 nm), and IR LED (880 nm) with radiation
power of up to 9.8 mW and 6.5 mW, respectively, the sensor can achieve a high sample
rate of up to 1000 Hz. Its programmable nature allows for precise control of a high
data output. The module interfaces using the I2C protocol with a four-pin connection
(VCC, GND, SDA, and SCL) to the MCU pins.
3. PKCELL LIPO Battery: A 350 mAh 3.7V lithium-ion polymer battery with dimension
of 36 mm × 19.6 mm × 5.2 mm), a standard discharge rate of 0.2C, and a maximum
continuous discharging current of 525 mA.
4. Raspberry Pi 4 Model B: This component features a Broadcom BCM2711, Quad-core
Cortex-A72 (ARM v8) 64-bit SoC @ 1.8 GHz, 8 GB LPDDR4-3200 SDRAM, 2.4 GHz
and 5.0 GHz 802.11ac [59] wireless, Bluetooth 5.0, gigabit Ethernet, operating on 5 V
DC via a USB-C connector and consuming less than 500 mA.
Sensors 2024, 24, 6531 12 of 19
Figure 4. Prototype device for the collection of physiological data (namely, blood oxygen levels and
pulse rates). (a) Block diagram and IC MAX30100 placement. (b,c) Circuit connection between the
XIAO ESP32-S3 development board and the sensors.
This wearable sensor system targets the continuous monitoring of blood oxygen levels
and pulse rates. The data are processed by the XIAO ESP32-S3 MCU from Seeed Studio,
which features IoT communication technology. The XIAO ESP32-S3 MCU is a compact
unit embedded with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, along with integrated power management and
battery protection features. A sensor attached to the MCU via I2C pins sends the collected
data over short-range Wi-Fi to a gateway device hosted by a Raspberry Pi Single-Board
Computer (SBC), where they are further processed. The IoT gateway receives data from
the MCU every five seconds and transfers them to the cloud (see Figure 4b).
Overall, the prototype is capable of various functions, including monitoring of patient
data using sensors directly attached to the patient’s body. The sensors and MCU are
integrated into a wearable device that patients can easily wear. This prototype can wirelessly
transmit data to the cloud without the need for extra wires. An access point receives data
from the wearable device via Wi-Fi. A schematic diagram of the circuit connection between
the XIAO ESP32-S3 development board and the sensors is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5. Components of the prototype. (a) Overview. (b,c) Gateway device connection with cloud
and power supply to MCU.
4.1.3. MIMIC
The MIMIC-IV Database [14] is a repository of physiological health features and indica-
tors obtained from intensive care patients. This repository contains various measurements
of patients under critical care, namely electrocardiogram readings, blood oxygen level,
Sensors 2024, 24, 6531 13 of 19
respiratory rate, etc. The data are collected using medical equipment directly from the
bedside of the patients. Patient identification related to the data is removed when placing
the records in the database. We consider the following four physiological features for our
analysis: heart rate (HR), pulse, breathing rate, and blood oxygen level (SpO2 ).
Figure 6. WBAN deployment and the predictive accuracy of the isolation forest-based redundancy
mitigation approach [48] (MIMIC dataset).
Sensors 2024, 24, 6531 14 of 19
Figure 7. Predictive accuracy of the statistical redundancy mitigation approach [49] (collected data).
The analysis (on 500 data points) of the QoS of the IF and ANOVA approaches shows
similar trends as the earlier analysis on predictive accuracy. The data loss rate is measured in
terms of the proportion of unique events not received by the BS, while latency is measured
in terms of the time elapsed between the occurrence of the event and its receipt at the BS.
For ANOVA, we analyze the effects of two significance levels (SLs), i.e., 0.05 and 0.10, on
the overall performance. Figure 8 shows the loss for ANOVA and latency to be significantly
higher than for IF. Since a higher SL makes it easier to reject the null hypothesis that the
two points are similar, ANOVA with an SL of 0.10 exhibits marginally improved results
relative to those achieved with an SL of 0.05.
Two consecutive data points sensed by a given node are considered the same if
the mean squared error (MSE) between them is within a predefined threshold range.
As illustrated in Figures 9 and 10, an increase in the MSE threshold results in greater
Sensors 2024, 24, 6531 15 of 19
Figure 10. Reduction in the number of transmitted bits achieved using GROWN [53].
5. Discussions
Future WBANs, especially those incorporating lightweight, energy-constrained biosen-
sor nodes, must carefully balance reliability with energy and storage efficiency. As high-
lighted in this survey, energy efficiency is paramount due to the limited battery life of
biosensor nodes [61]. Leveraging the inherent spatial and temporal patterns in biomedical
data streams can enhance both data transmission reliability and robustness against failures
while managing energy consumption. To address these challenges, strategies like adaptive
correlation-based optimization can dynamically adjust communication parameters based on
network conditions and energy levels. Additionally, energy-efficient encoding, decoding,
Sensors 2024, 24, 6531 16 of 19
and data aggregation methods will be critical in minimizing storage overhead. Optimal
node placement, utilizing overlapping radio ranges to provide redundancy, can improve
network reliability and ensure continuity in cases of node failure [62]. In WBANs, effec-
tively managing spatial and temporal correlations minimizes data loss risks and ensures
uninterrupted monitoring, which is especially vital in critical healthcare settings.
The emergence of software-defined wireless body area networks (SD-WBANs) represents
another significant advancement in the field, offering a flexible and programmable network
architecture where a centralized controller can dynamically regulate network topology
and traffic flow [63]. This is particularly useful in scenarios where the WBAN exhibits
heterogeneity in terms of power sources and configuration [64]. Understanding spatial and
temporal trends in data streams becomes particularly important in SD-WBANs, as they can
substantially enhance fault tolerance in time-critical applications. By introducing multiple
controllers within the SD-WBAN framework, the network can achieve higher levels of
reliability and resilience [61]. These additional controllers can act as backup nodes, taking
over control and data transmission responsibilities in the event of a failure, thereby ensuring
uninterrupted service and reducing the risk of data loss. The centralized nature of SD-
WBANs allows for sophisticated management strategies, such as real-time monitoring
and adaptive reconfiguration based on data correlations, optimizing resource utilization,
and maintaining high-quality service levels. Integrating machine learning algorithms to
preemptively address potential failures can also enhance their effectiveness in SD-WBANs.
Another security consideration is the possibility of compromising nodes to push incor-
rect health information. In future WBAN applications, it will be crucial to adopt consensus
or data fusion techniques to minimize adverse health outcomes from misreporting. Com-
promised nodes can potentially provide false data that may lead to incorrect diagnoses
or treatments, posing significant risks to patient safety. Consensus, as well as data fusion
techniques, involve multiple nodes reaching an agreement on the reported data, ensuring
that a single compromised node cannot influence the overall system [27]. These techniques
can help validate the accuracy of the data by comparing inputs from multiple biosensors
and identifying possible anomalies or inconsistencies. By requiring a majority agreement
before data are considered valid, consensus mechanisms can effectively mitigate the impact
of compromised nodes. Incorporating these security measures into the design of future
WBANs will be essential for maintaining the integrity and reliability of health monitoring
systems. By leveraging spatial and temporal trends to improve network performance and
enhance security, researchers can develop robust WBANs capable of providing accurate
and reliable health data, even in the presence of potential threats.
6. Conclusions
This survey examined strategies to address inherent spatial and temporal trends in
biomedical data, focusing on time-critical optimization goals such as robustness, optimized
placement, routing approaches, sampling rate calibration, machine and statistical learning,
and coding-based methodologies in wireless body area networks (WBANs). Our analysis,
utilizing a combination of the MIMIC clinical database and physiological data collected
using a prototype biosensing device built by our team, reveals that machine learning
(ML) approaches, particularly the isolation forest algorithm, significantly outperform
statistical methods in leveraging these correlations. Our results indicate that larger sample
sizes substantially enhance the predictive accuracy in identifying anomalous readings in
healthcare data. These insights highlight the importance of advanced ML techniques and
adequately sized datasets in improving energy efficiency, security, reliability, and robustness
in WBANs. We conclude with a discussion on the future of WBAN research to enhance the
quality of service and accuracy for real-world healthcare solutions.
Author Contributions: P.M. and S.R. curated the articles for review and conducted the computational
experiments. S.S. designed the prototype device and carried out data collection. P.G. and N.G. led the
manuscript writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Sensors 2024, 24, 6531 17 of 19
Funding: This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation (CBET-1802588), the
Commonwealth Health Research Board (CHRB-2360623), and the VCU Quest and Breakthrough Grant.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Pandey, I.; Dutta, H.; Banerjee, J.S. WBAN: A smart approach to next-generation e-healthcare system. In Proceedings of the
2019 3rd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), Erode, India, 27–29 March 2019;
IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 344–349.
2. Bhatt, V.; Chakraborty, S. Real-time healthcare monitoring using smart systems: A step towards healthcare service orchestration
Smart systems for futuristic healthcare. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart
Systems (ICAIS), Coimbatore, India, 25–27 March 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 772–777.
3. Jagadeeswari, V.; Subramaniyaswamy, V.; Logesh, R.; Vijayakumar, V. A study on medical Internet of Things and Big Data in
personalized healthcare system. Health Inf. Sci. Syst. 2018, 6, 14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Alfian, G.; Syafrudin, M.; Ijaz, M.; Syaekhoni, M.; Fitriyani, N.; Rhee, J. A personalized healthcare monitoring system for diabetic
patients by utilizing BLE-based sensors and real-time data processing. Sensors 2018, 18, 2183. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Philip, V.; Suman, V.; Menon, V.; Dhanya, K. A review on latest internet of things based healthcare applications. Int. J. Comput.
Sci. Inf. Secur. 2017, 15, 248.
6. Roy, S.; Das, S.K. Bio-Inspired Design of Biosensor Networks. Encycl. Sens. Biosens. 2023, 4, 86–102.
7. Kim, J.; Campbell, A.S.; de Ávila, B.; Wang, J. Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 389–406.
[CrossRef]
8. Meng, X. Virtual Reality Solutions for Sports Training Data Management with 5G UWB Communication Technology and Wearable
Devices. Comput.-Aided Des. Appl. 2024, 21, 92–108. [CrossRef]
9. Egbogah, E.; Fapojuwo, A. Achieving energy efficient transmission in wireless body area networks for the physiological
monitoring of military soldiers. In Proceedings of the MILCOM 2013–2013 IEEE Military Communications Conference, San
Diego, CA, USA, 18–20 November 2013; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 1371–1376.
10. Patel, M.; Wang, J. Applications, challenges, and prospective in emerging body area networking technologies. IEEE Wirel.
Commun. 2010, 17, 80–88. [CrossRef]
11. Kaur, N.; Verma, S.; Jhanjhi, N.; Singh, S.; Ghoniem, R.; Ray, S. Enhanced QoS-aware routing protocol for delay-sensitive data in
Wireless Body Area Networks. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 106000–106012. [CrossRef]
12. Mehmood, G.; Khan, M.; Abbas, S.; Faisal, M.; Rahman, H. An energy-efficient and cooperative fault-tolerant communication
approach for wireless body area network. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 69134–69147. [CrossRef]
13. Sahar, G.; Bakar, K.; Zuhra, F.; Rahim, S.; Bibi, T.; Madni, S. Data redundancy reduction for energy-efficiency in wireless sensor
networks: A comprehensive review. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 157859–157888. [CrossRef]
14. Moody, B.; Hao, S.; Gow, B.; Pollard, T.; Zong, W.; Mark, R. MIMIC-IV Waveform Database. PhysioNet 2022, 101, e215–e220.
[CrossRef]
15. Movassaghi, S.; Abolhasan, M.; Lipman, J.; Smith, D.; Jamalipour, A. Wireless body area networks: A survey. IEEE Commun.
Surv. Tutor. 2014, 16, 1658–1686. [CrossRef]
16. Choudhary, A.; Nizamuddin, M.; Zadoo, M. Body node coordinator placement algorithm for WBAN using multi-objective swarm
optimization. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 22, 2858–2867. [CrossRef]
17. ul Huque, M.; Munasinghe, K.; Jamalipour, A. Body node coordinator placement algorithms for wireless body area networks.
IEEE Internet Things J. 2014, 2, 94–102. [CrossRef]
18. Xing, J.; Zhu, Y. A survey on body area network. In Proceedings of the 2009 5th International Conference on Wireless
Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, Beijing, China, 24–26 September 2009; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2009;
pp. 1–4.
19. Yazdandoost, K.Y. Channel model for body area network (BAN). In Proceedings of the 2008 30th annual International Conference
of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 20–25 August 2008.
20. ElSalamouny, M.; Halawa, H.; Daoud, R.; Amer, H. Performance of fault-tolerant WBAN for healthcare. In Proceedings of the
2017 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS), Monastir, Tunisia, 8–10 May 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA,
2017; pp. 1–5.
21. Sarkar, S. Internet of Things—Robustness and reliability. In Internet of Things; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016;
pp. 201–218.
22. Sinche, S.; Polo, O.; Raposo, D.; Femandes, M.; Boavida, F.; Rodrigues, A.; Pereira, V.; Silva, J.S. Assessing redundancy models for
IoT reliability. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 19th International Symposium on “A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia
Networks” (WoWMoM), Chania, Greece, 12–15 June 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 14–15.
23. Rullo, A.; Serra, E.; Lobo, J. Redundancy as a measure of fault-tolerance for the Internet of Things: A review. In Policy-Based
Autonomic Data Governance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 202–226.
24. Samouni, N.; Jilbab, A.; Hammouch, A. A Critical Review on Recent Research on Reliable Communication for Wireless Body
Area Network. Int. J. Sens. Wirel. Commun. Control 2019, 9, 432–442. [CrossRef]
Sensors 2024, 24, 6531 18 of 19
25. Abdullah, W.A.N.W.; Yaakob, N.; Elobaid, M.E.; Warip, M.N.M.; Yah, S.A. Energy-efficient remote healthcare monitoring using
IoT: A review of trends and challenges. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things and Cloud
Computing, Dalian, China, 22–23 October 2016; pp. 1–8.
26. Wu, G.; Ren, J.; Xia, F.; Xu, Z. An adaptive fault-tolerant communication scheme for body sensor networks. Sensors 2010,
10, 9590–9608. [CrossRef]
27. Salayma, M.; Al-Dubai, A.; Romdhani, I.; Nasser, Y. Wireless body area network (WBAN) a survey on reliability, fault tolerance,
and technologies coexistence. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2017, 50, 1–38. [CrossRef]
28. Cavallari, R.; Martelli, F.; Rosini, R.; Buratti, C.; Verdone, R. A survey on wireless body area networks: Technologies and design
challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2014, 16, 1635–1657. [CrossRef]
29. Kaleem, M.; Devarajan, G. Energy-efficient classification strategy for detecting interference and malicious sensor nodes in wireless
body area Networks. Cyber Secur. Appl. 2024, 2, 100048. [CrossRef]
30. Bedi, P.; Das, S.; Goyal, S.; Rajawat, A.; Kumar, M. Energy-Efficient and Congestion-Thermal Aware Routing Protocol for WBAN.
Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2024, 137, 2167–2197. [CrossRef]
31. Cai, G.; Fang, Y.; Wen, J.; Han, G.; Yang, X. QoS-aware buffer-aided relaying implant WBAN for healthcare IoT: Opportunities
and challenges. IEEE Netw. 2019, 33, 96–103. [CrossRef]
32. Ali, A.; Khan, F. Energy-efficient cluster-based security mechanism for intra-WBAN and inter-WBAN communications for
healthcare applications. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2013, 2013, 216. [CrossRef]
33. Rakhee; Srinivas, M. Energy efficiency in load balancing of nodes using soft computing approach in WBAN. In Harmony Search
and Nature Inspired Optimization Algorithms: Theory and Applications, ICHSA 2018; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018;
pp. 423–430.
34. Samal, T.; Kabat, M. A prioritized traffic scheduling with load balancing in wireless body area networks. J. King Saud Univ.-Comput.
Inf. Sci. 2022, 34, 5448–5455. [CrossRef]
35. Shankar, V.; Natarajan, A.; Gupta, S.; Schwiebert, L. Energy-efficient protocols for wireless communication in biosensor networks.
In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC 2001),
San Diego, CA, USA, 30 September–3 October 2001; Proceedings (Cat. No. 01TH8598); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2001; Volume 1.
36. Vyas, A.; Pal, S. Exploiting redundancy and mobility in energy-efficient communication for WBANs. In Proceedings of the 21st
International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking, Kolkata, India, 4–7 January 2020; pp. 1–8.
37. Masroor, K.; Jeoti, V.; Drieberg, M. Improving the energy efficiency of a wireless body area network using a redundant coordinator
for healthcare applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced System (ICIAS),
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 13–14 August 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1–5.
38. Khan, R.; Memon, S. Sensors Transposing Technique for Minimizing the Path Loss Effect and Enhancement of Battery Lifetime in
Wireless Body Area Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Networking, Information Systems
& Security, Marrakech, Morocco, 31 March–2 April 2020; pp. 1–8.
39. Peng, Y.; Wang, X.; Guo, L.; Wang, Y.; Deng, Q. An efficient network coding-based fault-tolerant mechanism in WBAN for smart
healthcare monitoring systems. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 817. [CrossRef]
40. Yadav, D.; Tripathi, A. Load balancing and position-based adaptive clustering scheme for effective data communication in WBAN
healthcare monitoring systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control
(ISCO), Coimbatore, India, 5–6 January 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 302–305.
41. Shukla, S.; Sachan, V.; Sinha, A.; Pandey, S.; Rao, G.; Shah, M.; Choudhary, A.; Tamrakar, B. WHOOPH: Whale optimization-based
optimal placement of hub node within a WBAN. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 3422. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Patra, S.; Samal, T.; Kabat, M.; Mishra, M.; Barik, R. Optimizing relay node placement and routing in WBANs using free search
krill herd and harmony search algorithm. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024, 1–39. [CrossRef]
43. Singla, R.; Kaur, N.; Koundal, D.; Lashari, S.; Bhatia, S.; Rahmani, M.K.I. Optimized energy efficient secure routing protocol for
wireless body area network. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 116745–116759. [CrossRef]
44. Selem, E.; Fatehy, M.; Abd El-Kader, S. mobTHE (mobile temperature heterogeneity energy) aware routing protocol for WBAN
IoT health application. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 18692–18705. [CrossRef]
45. Shawqi J., A.; Kadhum Idrees, A. Adaptive rate energy-saving data collecting technique for health monitoring in wireless body
sensor networks. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2020, 33, e4589. [CrossRef]
46. Mehrani, M.; Attarzadeh, I.; Hosseinzadeh, M. Sampling rate prediction of biosensors in wireless body area networks using
deep-learning methods. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2020, 105, 102101. [CrossRef]
47. Kadhum Idrees, A.; Alhussein, D.; Harb, H. Energy-efficient multisensor adaptive sampling and aggregation for patient
monitoring in edge computing-based IoHT networks. J. Ambient. Intell. Smart Environ. 2023, 15, 419.
48. Jain, S.; Jain, P.; Upadhyay, P.; Moualeu, J.; Srivastava, A. An Energy Efficient Health Monitoring Approach with Wireless Body
Area Networks. ACM Trans. Comput. Healthc. (HEALTH) 2022, 3, 1–22. [CrossRef]
49. Harb, H.; Makhoul, A.; Couturier, R.; Medlej, M. ATP: An aggregation and transmission protocol for conserving energy in
periodic sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 24th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure
for Collaborative Enterprises, Larnaca, Cyprus, 15–17 June 2015; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 134–139.
50. Mohammadi, R.; Shirmohammadi, Z. Optimizing energy harvesting in wireless body area networks: A deep reinforcement
learning approach to dynamic sampling. Alex. Eng. J. 2024, 109, 157–175.
Sensors 2024, 24, 6531 19 of 19
51. Li, S.; Yang, H.; Xu, F.; Hu, H.; Hu, F. Energy-Efficient Relay Transmission for WBAN: Energy Consumption Minimizing Design
With Hybrid Supervised/Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 17770–17779.
52. Oliveira, C.; Ghamri-Doudane, Y.; Brito, C.; Lohier, S. Optimal network coding-based in-network data storage and data retrieval
for IoT/WSNs. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications,
Cambridge, MA, USA, 28–30 September 2015; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 208–215.
53. Passos, C.; Pedroso, C.; Batista, A.; Nogueira, M.; Santos, A. GROWN: Local Data Compression in Real-Time to Support Energy
Efficiency in WBAN. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Latin-American Conference on Communications (LATINCOM), Santo
Domingo, Dominican Republic, 18–20 November 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 1–6.
54. Razavi, R.; Fleury, M.; Ghanbari, M. Rateless coding on a wearable wireless network for augmented reality and biosensors.
In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Cannes,
France, 15–18 September 2008; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 1–4.
55. Wang, K.; Song, M.; Bian, G.; Shao, B.; Huang, K. A Lightweight Identity-Based Network Coding Scheme for Internet of Medical
Things. Electronics 2024, 13, 1316. [CrossRef]
56. Boussaid, A.; Alaoui, N.; Aghzout, O.; Chakkour, Y.; Alejos, A.; Falcone, F. Highly efficient error correcting codes for ubiquitous
healthcare in Wireless Body Area Networks. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Electrical and Information
Technologies (ICEIT), Tangiers, Morocco, 4–7 May 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 225–230.
57. Gupta, A.; Chaurasiya, V. QoS supported redundancy balanced data transmission scheme for wireless body area network-
based H-IoT. Wirel. Netw. 2023, 29, 3793–3808.
58. Matloff, N. Introduction to Discrete-Event Simulation and the Simpy Language; Department of Computer Science, University of
California at Davis: Davis, CA, USA, 2008; Volume 2, pp. 1–33.
59. Ong, E.; Kneckt, J.; Alanen, O.; Chang, Z.; Huovinen, T.; Nihtilä, T. IEEE 802.11 ac: Enhancements for very high throughput
WLANs. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications,
Toronto, ON, Canada, 11–14 September 2011; pp. 849–853.
60. Arslan, M.; Guzel, M.; Demirci, M.; Ozdemir, S. SMOTE and Gaussian noise-based sensor data augmentation. In Proceedings of
the 2019 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), Samsun, Turkey, 11–15 September 2019;
IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–5.
61. Rak, J.; Pickavet, M.; Trivedi, K.; Lopez, J.; Koster, A.; Sterbenz, J.; Çetinkaya, E.; Gomes, T.; Gunkel, M.; Walkowiak, K.; et al.
Future research directions in the design of reliable communication systems. Telecommun. Syst. 2015, 60, 423–450. [CrossRef]
62. Sharma, V.; Kumar, S.; Bhushan, S. An overview of data redundancy reduction schemes in WSNs. In Proceedings of the 2017
3rd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication & Automation (ICACCA) (Fall), Dehradun, India,
15–16 September 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–8.
63. Hasan, K.; Wu, X.; Biswas, K.; Ahmed, K. A novel framework for software-defined wireless body area network. In Proceedings
of the 2018 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation (ISMS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,
8–10 May 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 114–119.
64. Cicioğlu, M.; Çalhan, A. HUBsFLOW: A novel interface protocol for SDN-enabled WBANs. Comput. Netw. 2019, 160, 105–117.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.