HackXios
HackXios
2) Woona jeevan
START
PROBLEM STATEMENT :-
• Even with good experience and skills, several candidates lose opportunities for jobs
since their resumes do not create an impression. Resumes do not have good
formatting, impactful language, the right keywords, or matching for specific job
posts. Furthermore, doing resumes by hand or refining them takes too much time
and is inconsistent when applying to numerous jobs. This problem can be solved by
using an AI solution, which can provide quick, intelligent, and focused feedback.
START
Key Issues Identified:
START
Objective
The primary intention of this project is to establish a backend solution that employs AI and natural
language processing to study resumes and make meaningful, personal suggestions for
improvements. The backend system should make content quality improved, job-role alignment
better, and role-oriented, professional-based recommendations — without any human
interaction from experts or HR.
Our Objectives:
->Develop an AI tool that scrutinizes resumes thoughtfully
->Make personalized improvement proposals
->Identify irrelevant content or missing skills
->Suggest strong, professional wording
->Align resumes with job descriptions (if available)
START
Key Features
AI Resume Guide presents a range of strong features dedicated to the backend and logic. From
resume upload to getting intelligent suggestions, the experience is crafted to be seamless and
effective. Whether or not a job description is given, the system offers constructive feedback to
enhance the overall strength of the resume.
Highlighted Features:
->PDF and DOCX resume upload support
->Parsing and extracting structured resume data
->NLP-driven content analysis and section review
->AI-driven role-based suggestions for enhancements
->Skill gap detection and keyword suggestions
->Enhanced wording for poor bullet points
->(Optional) JD-driven resume customization
START
System Architecture
The system is modular and has a logical sequence where every component takes care
of a particular section of the resume enhancement process. It begins by consuming resume input,
parsing it as structured data, and then subjecting it to an AI engine that produces improvement
suggestions via logic rules or job description matching.
Workflow:
->Resume Input
->Resume Parser (PDF/DOCX to text)
->AI Analyzer (LLM Prompt Engine + Rules)
->Suggestions Generator
->Output: Final Recommendations
START
Tech Stack
We opted for a lightweight and efficient backend-centric tech stack that enables quick development,
clean parsing, and seamless AI integration. The idea was to stay away from UI complexity
and purely work on backend functionality and logic, as dictated by the judging criteria.
Technologies Used:
->Backend: Python, Flask (for API processing)
->Parsing: pdf miner, docx2txt, resume-parser
->AI/NLP: OpenAI GPT API, spaCy, BERT
->Job Matching & Embeddings: TF-IDF, cosine similarity
->Optional: MongoDB (for temporarily storing parsed results)
START
AI Integration
The core of the project is the AI suggestion engine. It employs language models to analyze and
rewrite poor content, identify missing facts, and create intelligent suggestions based on role-
based expectations. AI prompts are context-aware, i.e., suggestions vary depending on resume
sections, tone, or job description (if shared).
AI Features:
->Professional rewriting of bullet points
->Keyword density improvement for ATS
->Job-role specific recommendations
->Skill gap detection based on role/industry
->Contextual awareness (e.g., tone/formality)
->JD-resume comparison using vector embeddings
START
Accuracy & Evaluation
We ensured the system provided useful and relevant feedback by evaluating AI output on
various resumes. We refined the prompts to avoid vague or generic suggestions and used job
descriptions to fine-tune AI context. The result is an accurate, smart tool that makes
meaningful improvements.
Evaluation Techniques:
• Prompt engineering for accuracy
• Skill matching with job title
• Resume vs JD comparison using embeddings
• Tested on 10+ sample resumes
• Manual review of output quality
START
THANK YOU
START