Recent Advances in Laser Refractive Surgery
Recent Advances in Laser Refractive Surgery
Recent Advances in Laser Refractive Surgery
LASIK
PRK/ASA/Lasek
All laser Lasik/Femtosecond Lasik
Relax Smile
KPJ 24-8-14
Lasik
KPJ 24-8-14
K. Soloman et al. LASIK World Literature Review Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction.
Ophthalmology Volume 116, Issue 4, Pages 691701,
April 2009
309 database articles
An average 95.4% of patients were satisfied with their
outcome
One of the most successful elective surgeries
KPJ 24-8-14
EXCIMER LASER
KPJ 24-8-14
Subject to inconsistency
differences in corneal hydration
laser fluence projection
reflection losses
temperature and humidity in the laser room
other environmental factors
KPJ 24-8-14
Femtosecond laser
Not affected by environment factors
KPJ 24-8-14
ASA/PRK
Advantages
Effective, predictable
Safe
Thin cornea
Epithelial basement membrane dystrophy
Disadvantages
Discomfort
Slower visual recovery
Haze
Incidence reduced with newer technology
Mitomycin C
KPJ 24-8-14
LASIK
Laser Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis
KPJ 24-8-14
LASIK
Advantages
Rapid Visual Recovery
Pain Free
Early Stability
Disadvantages
Flap creation
Microkeratome
Long tract record
Improvement in design
and safety profile
KPJ 24-8-14
Flap Creation
Femtosecond laser
Safer for new/inexperience surgeon
Gaining popularity due
to surgeon preference
KPJ 24-8-14
KPJ 24-8-14
Relex Smile
Advantages
Minimally invasive
Flapless, no risk of flap displacement
Painless
Less dry eye
Stronger cornea architecture1,2
Disadvantages
New procedure
Limitation of only correcting shortsightedness and astigmatism
1. Di Wu et al.Corneal biomechanical effects: Small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract
Refract Surg 2014; 40:954-962.
2.Abhijit Sinha Roy et al. comparison of biomechanical effects of small incision lenticule extraction laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. Finite element
analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40:971-980.
KPJ 24-8-14
Results
1. Kazutaka Kamiya et.al. Early clinical outcomes, including efficacy and endothelial cell loss, of refractive lenticule extraction using a 500 kHz femtosecond
laser to correct myopia. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Volume 38, Issue 11, November 2012, Pages 1996-2002
2. Rupal Shah et.al. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37:127137
3. Anders H. et.at. Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction. J Cataract & Refract
Surg, Volume 40, Issue 3, March 2014, Pages 403-411
4. Marcus Blum et.al. Five-year results of refractive lenticule extraction. J Cataract & Refract Surg, Volume 40, Issue 9, September 2014, Pages 1425-1429
KPJ 24-8-14
KPJ 24-8-14
Ideal candidate
PREOPERATIVE EXAMINATION
KPJ 24-8-14
Change of lifestyle
KPJ 24-8-14
Change of lifestyle
KPJ 24-8-14
In general
Highly predictable
Highly reproducible
High safety margin
Various options to suit different need
Side effects or complications are minimal with well trained
surgeon
Exciting technology (Relax Smile) is NOW available!
KPJ 24-8-14
Conclusion
Thank you
KPJ 24-8-14