Bics and Calp
Bics and Calp
(www.iteachilearn.com)
Differences, cont.,
BICS is while CALP is
to a large extent what more abstract, and
students can see, feel, contains less
taste, touch, and hear personally meaningful
structures
e.g., referents, articles
(www.iteachilearn.com)
Significance:
Whether or not one sees the framework of BICS and CALP as an
absolute or complete explanation of proficiency levels of English
Language Learners (ELLs), it can be helpful in making instructional
and programmatic decisions:
Understanding that students who are able to interact successfully with peers in
the classroom may still need explicit instruction in vocabulary and academic
language. Teachers may use this information to plan instruction.
Knowing the difference may prevent teachers and administrators from exiting
ELLs from language support programs too soon (Cummins, 1987).
Klingner & Harry (2004) aver that ELLs are over-referred to special
education programs. Realizing that students are not necessarily prepared for
academic success once theyve achieved conversational fluency may also be
helpful in reducing the over-referral of ELLs for special education services
Research by Thomas and Collier,
(1997)
Found that the most important factor was the
amount of education in the L1
5-7 to reach age and grade level norms with 2-3
years of education in L1
7-10 or more to reach age and grade level norms
with no education in the L1
Typically, non-native speakers do reasonably well
in grades K-3, but when they get past 3rd grade,
students with little or no academic and cognitive
development in L1 do less and less well