Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 26 views

    Prop-093: Reducing The Minimum Delegation Size For The Final /8

    Uploaded by

    ThanhNN0312
    This document proposes reducing the minimum delegation size from a /22 to a /24 when APNIC activates its final /8 IPv4 allocation policy. Currently, the policy requires networks to justify needing a /24 immediately and a /23 within a year to receive a /22 allocation. Reducing the minimum to a /24 would allow more small networks, including those that are multihomed, operate critical infrastructure, or connect to internet exchange points, to qualify for IPv4 addresses from the final /8. The advantages are that more networks would be able to access the remaining IPv4 addresses and transition from IPv4 to IPv6. No disadvantages are foreseen.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Prop-093: Reducing The Minimum Delegation Size For The Final /8

    Uploaded by

    ThanhNN0312
    26 views9 pages
    This document proposes reducing the minimum delegation size from a /22 to a /24 when APNIC activates its final /8 IPv4 allocation policy. Currently, the policy requires networks to justify needing a /24 immediately and a /23 within a year to receive a /22 allocation. Reducing the minimum to a /24 would allow more small networks, including those that are multihomed, operate critical infrastructure, or connect to internet exchange points, to qualify for IPv4 addresses from the final /8. The advantages are that more networks would be able to access the remaining IPv4 addresses and transition from IPv4 to IPv6. No disadvantages are foreseen.

    Original Description:

    done

    Original Title

    prop-093-v0

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document proposes reducing the minimum delegation size from a /22 to a /24 when APNIC activates its final /8 IPv4 allocation policy. Currently, the policy requires networks to justify needing a /24 immediately and a /23 within a year to receive a /22 allocation. Reducing the minimum to a /24 would allow more small networks, including those that are multihomed, operate critical infrastructure, or connect to internet exchange points, to qualify for IPv4 addresses from the final /8. The advantages are that more networks would be able to access the remaining IPv4 addresses and transition from IPv4 to IPv6. No disadvantages are foreseen.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    26 views9 pages

    Prop-093: Reducing The Minimum Delegation Size For The Final /8

    Uploaded by

    ThanhNN0312
    This document proposes reducing the minimum delegation size from a /22 to a /24 when APNIC activates its final /8 IPv4 allocation policy. Currently, the policy requires networks to justify needing a /24 immediately and a /23 within a year to receive a /22 allocation. Reducing the minimum to a /24 would allow more small networks, including those that are multihomed, operate critical infrastructure, or connect to internet exchange points, to qualify for IPv4 addresses from the final /8. The advantages are that more networks would be able to access the remaining IPv4 addresses and transition from IPv4 to IPv6. No disadvantages are foreseen.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 9

    Prop-093: Reducing the minimum

    delegation size for the final /8


    Randy Bush, Philip Smith, Andy Linton &
    Terence Zhang
    Policy SIG @ APNIC 31
    23rd & 24th February 2011
    Hong Kong
    Introduction
    • Proposal to change the minimum size of IPv4
    delegations to a /24 when the final /8 policy
    is activated
    Current Problem
    • Current final /8 policy requires networks to
    meet the requirements for the minimum
    allocation size currently in place
    – To justify a /22, an immediate need for a /24 must
    be demonstrated, with a detailed plan for use of a
    /23 within a year
    – This prevents small networks that are multihomed,
    operating critical infrastructure, or connecting to
    IXPs, or running IPv6 transition tools such as
    NAT64 from justifying a need for IPv4 addresses
    from the final /8
    Situation in other RIRs
    • There is no similar policy or proposal in other
    regions
    Details of the Proposal
    • The minimum delegation size be set to /24
    • The maximum delegation size remains at /22
    – An organisation receiving a /24 under this proposal will be
    able to request more IPv4 address space until they have
    received a total of a /22
    • Delegations under the final /8 policy will be extended
    to include:
    – Small multihoming assignments
    – Internet Exchange Points
    – Critical infrastructure
    Advantages
    • Proposal allows a greater range of networks
    to access resources in the final /8
    • Extends the maximum possible total of
    networks benefiting from the final /8 from
    around 16000 to around 65000
    – Widens the assistance available to networks
    making the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 over the
    coming years
    Disadvantages
    • No disadvantages are foreseen
    Impact on APNIC members and
    NIRs
    • This proposal impacts all APNIC members
    • This proposal has no direct impact on NIRS,
    but impacts members of NIRs in the same
    way it impacts APNIC members
    Questions?

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy