Neo Functionalism

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

NEO FUNCTIONALISM

NEO FUNCTIONALISM
 The term neofunctionalism was used to indicate continuity
with structural functionalism but also to demonstrate that an
effort was being made to extend structural functionalism and
overcome its major difficulties.

 Jeffrey Alexander and Paul Colomy define neofunctionalism


as “a self-critical strand of functional theory what seeks to
broaden functionalism’s intellectual scope while retaining its
theoretical core”
 Interrelationship of major domains of social world.

 All about social and personality system.

 Can be viewed as an effort to recapture such


orientation.
 Alexander -1985, enumerated the problems associated with
structural functionalism including “anti-individualism,, “antagonism”
to change,” “convservatism,” “idealism,” and anti-emirical bias”.

 Despite his enthusiasm for neofunctionalism, in the mid-1980s


Alexander was forced to conclude that “neofunctionalism is a
tendency rather than a developed theory” (1985a:16). After
Alexander’s confession of the weakness of neofunctionalism and
argued that it had already made enormous strides.

 It
has become a field of intense theoretical discourse and growing
empirical investigation.
 First, neofunctionalism operates with a descriptive model of society that sees society
composed of elements which, in interaction with one another form a pattern.
 Second, Alexander argues the neofunctionalism devotes roughly equal attention to action
and order.
 Third, neofunctionalism retains the structural-functional interest in integration, not as an
accomplished fact but rather as a social posibility! It recognized that deviance and social
control are realities within the social system.
 Fourth, neofunctionalism accepts the traditional Parsonian emphasis on personality, culture,
and social system.
 Fifth, neofunctionalism focuses on social change in the process of differentiation within the
social, cultural and personality systems.
 Finally, Alexander argues that neofunctionalism “implies the commitment to the
independence of conceptualization and theorizing from other levels of sociological analysis.
 Colomy (1986) has defealt more specifically with a revised structural functional
theory of change . He argues that the structural-functional theory of change
(“differentation theory”)

Parasonian theory has three basic weaknesses.


First, it is highly abstract and lacks empirical and historical specificity.
Second, it does not devote enough attention to concrete groups and social processes
or to power and conflict.
Third, it overemphasizes the integration produced by structural change.

 Colomy and Rhoades-1994 have argued that differentaition theory needs to


move in yet another integrative direction.
Micro bias and Micro corrective
THANK YOU!

Airen Ticudo
Mary France Baal
Romalyn Balid

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy