The Body and Gender: Gender in A Comparative Perspective
The Body and Gender: Gender in A Comparative Perspective
The Body and Gender: Gender in A Comparative Perspective
Gender
Gender in a Comparative
Perspective
– The sexual division of labor refers to the patterned ways in which productive and other
economic activities are allocated to men and women.
– There is a sexual division of labor in all cultures
– Main argument: division of labor and gender roles are rapidly changing, especially in
North America => demolish the idea that it is only natural for the man to be the
breadwinner and the woman to be the caretaker of the family.
– Ethnographic data prove that in many cases this is not true, and thus contradict the
idea that the widespread domination of men over women is rooted in the “fact” that
men’s labor is more important to physical survival and material well-being than
women’s labor.
The Sexual Division of Labor
2) Fertility Maintenance
It has been suggested that productive activities that require a strenuous amount of
physical exertion can depress a woman’s fertility, such that reproduction would be
so decreased that the population might not be able to maintain its numbers over
the course of generations.
1- Hypotheses for Existent Patterns
Even if the three hypotheses combined could explain the similar patterns that exist
around the world in terms of the division of labor, these hypotheses cannot explain
the differences that exist, the cross-cultural diversity in the division of labor.
Constants (such as physical differences between males and females) cannot explain
diversity and variability.
2-Explaining Diversity and Variability
– Why is it that the division of labor according to sex in certain times proves to be
culture-specific?
– Example: Intensive agriculture and women’s labor => women do remarkable
amount and quality of work in horticultural societies but when societies
develop intensive agricultural systems, the women’s contribution diminishes.
Why?
– Suggestions:
1. Men are out hunting and absent from home; women do the work
2. Men are out fighting in wars or protecting the territory and cannot do
gardening work themselves
2-Explaining Diversity and Variability
– Hypothesis:
As cultivation becomes more intensive, two changes affect the women’s domestic
workload:
1. tasks that women perform in all cultures require more time in intensive systems
(ex: roots vs. cereals)
2. in intensive systems, new tasks emerge that are generally done by women
(planting process of roots vs. cereals)
Both changes => divert women’s time away from cultivation, so they work relatively less
than men in providing food.
Example mainly to show that sexual division of labor is “cultural”. What do you think?
Sexual Division of Labor in Industrialized Modern Societies
If it is true that the division of labor in pre-modern populations was mainly
affected by factors such as male vs. female strength or the fact that only
women can bear and nurse children, then this matters for modern
employment patterns, for a number of reasons:
1- automated machinery has greatly reduced the need for strength to
perform tasks
2- economies are service and high-tech oriented
3- birthrate of industrialized nations is far lower than that of pre-industrialized
peoples (child care burdens are less for women)
4- some tasks were allocated to women because they were compatible with
childcare, but now there are for example child-care specialists or schools that
perform these duties
The Status of Women
– Another main issue in the anthropological study of gender is how and why the status of
women varies cross-culturally.
– Women’s status is multidimensional: comprised from a complexity of features that make
it difficult to categorize the status of women as “high” or “low” even in a single culture.
An array of economic, political, religious and familial factors determine the status of
women across societies, and some of these dimensions may seem to contradict each
other (ex: “autonomy” inside vs. outside of domestic context)
Also, aspects of the status of women vary according to social context and situation.
The status of a woman can change over the course of her life (ex: wife in the household)
The Status of Women
– Despite its complexity, “the status of women” should still be used as a concept to explain the
degree to which women are subordinate to me.
– Universal Subordination? Are women everywhere subordinate to men?
– First thing first, it has never been recorded that in a society women dominate men. There has
been powerful women, queens, but there is no matriarchy in history.
– Common answer to the question: either in politics or in religious/social contexts, powerful
roles have always been exclusive to men, women always come second in authority.
– Women as a “social category” are everywhere devalued relative to men as a “social category”
The Status of Women
– In answer to the question, important to notice in regards to ethnographic records:
Sources of androcentric bias: ethnographic data has been biased –fieldworkers
had little access to women’s point of view which was largely unreported
Eurocentric bias – inequality and hierarchies of knowledge production (bowing
to husband in china)
Regardless of the description that we might agree on referring to the status of
women, the first step is to acknowledge that differences exist, and they should
be studies in order to figure out the conditions under which future equality can
be achieved.
Influences on Women’s Status