The Body and Gender: Gender in A Comparative Perspective

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21

The Body and

Gender

Gender in a Comparative
Perspective

Peoples and Bailey


“Everywhere, gender matters: It makes a difference
for who you are, what you have, how you interact,
and what you can become, among other things.”

When was the last time you had to think about


gender?
– Possible Situations:

• Body image/appearance/ dress/ body hair


• Social roles (behavior, public space)
• Responsibilities and obligations (financial support)
• Stereotypes (care takers)
• Labor expectations/ stereotypes
• Authority
• Language (swearing, curse words) public/private
• Social norms, values, pre-conceived ideas
• Career aspirations/ employment
• Education
• Gendered products
• Rights and inheritance
• Safety in general – freedom (to go out late,
move, learn) social class
• Sports and hobbies
• Intelligence
• Showing emotion
What is gender?

– Enculturation? The process of learning what is expected from you


– What is he difference between sex and gender?
A person’s sex is determined biologically, by your chromosomes; you genitalia,
predominant hormones, and secondary sexual characteristics (hair, breasts,
body size etc.)
Gender, in contrast, is culturally defined.
Gender encompasses all the traits that a culture assigns to and instills in males
and females. “Gender,” in other words, refers to the cultural construction of
whether one is female, male, or something else
What is gender?

– Anthropologists often say that gender is “culturally constructed”, not


biologically determined.
– A person’s sex is physical, but most elements of maleness and femaleness
are socially learned during enculturation.
– To say that gender is culturally constructed is to say that being
biologically male or female has different implications in different cultures.
Ex: Hua of New Guinea => cultures use the physical “raw materials” of physical
difference to construct varying beliefs about the ways in which males and females differ.
Ex: Disney movies? Euro American culture –and other (women fragile, men tough) =>
cultural implications?
What is gender?

– Anthropologists observe that gender roles vary with environment, economy,


adaptive strategy, and types of political systems.
– A couple terms:
 Gender roles are the tasks and activities a culture assigns. Related to gender
roles are gender stereotypes, which are oversimplified but strongly held
ideas about the characteristics of males and females.
 Gender stratification: Unequal distribution of social resources between men
and women.
– Culture’s ideas about masculinity and femininity – permeate relationships and
behavior, as well as other important implications
The Sexual Division of Labor

– The sexual division of labor refers to the patterned ways in which productive and other
economic activities are allocated to men and women.
– There is a sexual division of labor in all cultures
– Main argument: division of labor and gender roles are rapidly changing, especially in
North America => demolish the idea that it is only natural for the man to be the
breadwinner and the woman to be the caretaker of the family.
– Ethnographic data prove that in many cases this is not true, and thus contradict the
idea that the widespread domination of men over women is rooted in the “fact” that
men’s labor is more important to physical survival and material well-being than
women’s labor.
The Sexual Division of Labor

– “Unless we become educated about the cultural diversity of humanity, we consistently


and usually mistakenly, conclude that the ideas and practices of our own societies are
universal or inherent in human nature.”
– But although “man is the breadwinner and woman is the caretaker” might not be
universal, there exist despite cultural variations some cross-cultural regularities and
patterns in the sexual division of labor.
– What are these patterns and what factors influence them?
Table in text:
1- All human societies divide some kinds of labor by sex in similar
ways. (there are patterns). So why is it the case that some tasks
are either male or female?
2- There are tasks that are not determined, either males or
females or both among societies do them. What determines the
cultural variability in the sexual division of labor?
1- Hypotheses for Existent Patterns

1) The Relative Strength of the Sexes


Physical strength is relevant to the type of activities either males or females
perform.
On average, adult males are able to more efficiently perform tasks that require
great strength, so such work is usually allocated to males.
However, it is not always the case, such that some forms of labor allocated to
women require a lot of physical strength.
Tough character?
1- Hypotheses for Existent Patterns

2) Fertility Maintenance
It has been suggested that productive activities that require a strenuous amount of
physical exertion can depress a woman’s fertility, such that reproduction would be
so decreased that the population might not be able to maintain its numbers over
the course of generations.
1- Hypotheses for Existent Patterns

3) Compatibility with Child Care


Women are the bearers, nursers, and primary caretakers of infants and young
children.
So women are allocated tasks that they can perform while caring for children.

 Even if the three hypotheses combined could explain the similar patterns that exist
around the world in terms of the division of labor, these hypotheses cannot explain
the differences that exist, the cross-cultural diversity in the division of labor.
 Constants (such as physical differences between males and females) cannot explain
diversity and variability.
2-Explaining Diversity and Variability

– Why is it that the division of labor according to sex in certain times proves to be
culture-specific?
– Example: Intensive agriculture and women’s labor => women do remarkable
amount and quality of work in horticultural societies but when societies
develop intensive agricultural systems, the women’s contribution diminishes.
Why?
– Suggestions:
1. Men are out hunting and absent from home; women do the work
2. Men are out fighting in wars or protecting the territory and cannot do
gardening work themselves
2-Explaining Diversity and Variability

– Hypothesis:
As cultivation becomes more intensive, two changes affect the women’s domestic
workload:
1. tasks that women perform in all cultures require more time in intensive systems
(ex: roots vs. cereals)
2. in intensive systems, new tasks emerge that are generally done by women
(planting process of roots vs. cereals)
Both changes => divert women’s time away from cultivation, so they work relatively less
than men in providing food.
 Example mainly to show that sexual division of labor is “cultural”. What do you think?
Sexual Division of Labor in Industrialized Modern Societies
If it is true that the division of labor in pre-modern populations was mainly
affected by factors such as male vs. female strength or the fact that only
women can bear and nurse children, then this matters for modern
employment patterns, for a number of reasons:
1- automated machinery has greatly reduced the need for strength to
perform tasks
2- economies are service and high-tech oriented
3- birthrate of industrialized nations is far lower than that of pre-industrialized
peoples (child care burdens are less for women)
4- some tasks were allocated to women because they were compatible with
childcare, but now there are for example child-care specialists or schools that
perform these duties
The Status of Women
– Another main issue in the anthropological study of gender is how and why the status of
women varies cross-culturally.
– Women’s status is multidimensional: comprised from a complexity of features that make
it difficult to categorize the status of women as “high” or “low” even in a single culture.
 An array of economic, political, religious and familial factors determine the status of
women across societies, and some of these dimensions may seem to contradict each
other (ex: “autonomy” inside vs. outside of domestic context)
 Also, aspects of the status of women vary according to social context and situation.
 The status of a woman can change over the course of her life (ex: wife in the household)
The Status of Women
– Despite its complexity, “the status of women” should still be used as a concept to explain the
degree to which women are subordinate to me.
– Universal Subordination? Are women everywhere subordinate to men?
– First thing first, it has never been recorded that in a society women dominate men. There has
been powerful women, queens, but there is no matriarchy in history.
– Common answer to the question: either in politics or in religious/social contexts, powerful
roles have always been exclusive to men, women always come second in authority.
– Women as a “social category” are everywhere devalued relative to men as a “social category”
The Status of Women
– In answer to the question, important to notice in regards to ethnographic records:
 Sources of androcentric bias: ethnographic data has been biased –fieldworkers
had little access to women’s point of view which was largely unreported
 Eurocentric bias – inequality and hierarchies of knowledge production (bowing
to husband in china)
 Regardless of the description that we might agree on referring to the status of
women, the first step is to acknowledge that differences exist, and they should
be studies in order to figure out the conditions under which future equality can
be achieved.
Influences on Women’s Status

a) Women’s contribution to material welfare (women’s role in production greatly


influences their rights, freedom and other dimensions of overall status)
b) Women’s control over key sources (it’s not only women’s role in production, but
their control of it: owning land/resources and have control over them => modern
involvement in the work force)
c) Descent and post marital residence (matrilineal/matrilocal vs. patrilineal societies
=> who moves after marriage, domestic authority)
d) Overall social complexity (women’s overall status has decreased as social
complexity increased; at least until the industrial revolution in the 1700s/ sub-
Saharan Africa vs. Euroasia)
– Women’s status in industrial societies
 Anthropological studies show that although the status of
women decreased as social complexity increased, there has
been a reverse in this hypothesis after industrialization (for
reasons discussed before)
 What can be said is that as long as there are differences in
division of labor and the overall status of women, this shows
that there is hope that modern societies can move towards
eliminating barriers to female opportunity and achievement.
 Until now, no key has been discovered to leading to total
equality between the sexes, achieving equality in one
domain (workplace) has not insured it in other contexts (the
family household for example)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy