Analytical Study On Seismic Behaviour of High Rise Building Using Different Load Resisting Method

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 33

ANALYTICAL STUDY ON SEISMIC

BEHAVIOUR OF HIGH RISE BUILDING


USING DIFFERENT LOAD RESISTING
METHOD

KUMAR ANUPAM
(1901431010)
UNDER GUIDANCE OF
MR. TASLEEM ZEESHAN
INTRODUCTION
 Height of the building has now become the primary point of focus of
today’s world. Since buildings are getting taller and slender the primary
concern of design engineers is shifting from gravity loads to lateral loads.

The effect of lateral forces becomes more and more dominant as the
building becomes taller and taller. These lateral forces can produce critical
stresses in the structure, induce undesirable stresses and vibrations or cause
excessive lateral sway of the structure.

 This has brought more challenges for the engineers to satisfy both gravities
load as well as lateral loads, earlier buildings were designed gravity loads but
now because of tall height and seismic zone the engineers have taken care of
lateral loads due to earthquake and wind forces.
So, to cater all the lateral forces, we have to design the structure
very uniquely so that the structure can withstand for the maximum
time period without causing any harm to the society.

 The Engineers and professional in the structural designing fields


have found out many ways to tackle this problem. Traditional simple
framed structures have now been replaced by complex yet more
effective structural systems that perform better in case of lateral
load.
Lateral Load Resisting Systems
When reinforced concrete was first introduced as a building material, there were
limitations on the heights that those buildings could reach.

Structural engineers have gradually learned more about the properties of


concrete and the structural systems.

These elements are a variety of shapes such as Circular, curvilinear, oval, box-
like, triangular or rectilinear. Many times, a shear wall exists as a core-wall holding
internal services like elevators, janitor's closets, stair wells and storage areas.
Sometimes they serve external functions as a diagonal bracing system.

When carefully planned, these walls may be used as partitions in a structure


serving as both gravity- and a lateral-load bearing system.
Few of the Lateral Load Resisting Structural
Systems are
 Frame Action of Column and Slab Systems

 Braced Frame

 Shear Wall

 Framed shear Wall

 Framed Tube System

 Tube in Tube System


Literature Review
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Shubham P 2017 Comparative On the basis of lateral


Dhoke analysis of displacement, story drift,
IJIRSET various lateral modal time period and
International load resisting story shear forces. Author
Journal of system i.e. conclude that the diagrid
Innovative beam column system which better
Research in system , frame stiffness than frame tube
Science, tube system and system and beam-column
Engineering and diagrid system. system
Technology
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal
Dr. S. 2017 Analytical study Dynamic analysis of building
Senthilselvan on curtailed models with curtailment of
IRJET shear wall on shear wall at different levels
G. International seismic reveal that curtailment up to
Vimalanandan research performance of one fourth height of 30 storey
journal of high rise building has ideal performance
engineering building against seismic load. So, it also
and affirms that curtailment of shear
technology wall ultimately reduces the cost
of structure and improves the
seismic performance of
building.
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal
H. O. Okail, 2014 Seismic A number of prototype
Behaviour of models were analyzed using
A. A. Electronic High-Rise elastic linear response
Abdelrahman journal of Buildings with spectrum and
structural Transfer inelastic nonlinear time history
E.Y. Sayed- engineering Floors techniques using three-
Ahmed (EJSE) dimensional finite element
models
The numerical analysis
revealed that the transfer
girders system is a
competitive alternative to the
slab system in terms of
reducing the seismic weights,
more flexible as well as the
material cost .
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Kartik prashar 2018 Seismic Out of various


Behaviour of arrangements of bracing X
Jagdeep Singh Research RC Frame barcing system are more
Gahir Gate Structure With effective in increasing
Different Types lateral load capacity of
of Bracing structure.
System
The performance of the
steel cross bracing is
better then other bracing
system.
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Liqiang Jiang 2016 Seismic The test results showed


behaviour of a that partially infilled steel
Yi Hu Research steel frame frames exhibited higher
gate partially infilled initial stiffness and higher
with precast loading capacity than the
reinforced bare steel frame.
concrete wall
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Vijaya Kumari 2015 Studied dynamic Comparative study was


Gowda analysis of tall carried out by using
International structure system different types of belt truss
Manohar B. C Journal of by introducing belt which includes X, V,
Engineering truss at top and inverted V, diagonal etc
Research & mid height of
Technology building V-type of belt truss is one
(IJERT) of the best types of belt
truss in all seismic zones
to increase the efficiency
of the building
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Abhishek 2018 Seismic This study evaluates the


Reddy Performance seismic performance of such
International Evaluation of flag wall structural systems
Journal of High-rise used as an alternative to the
Naveen Scientific & Buildings with conventional outrigger system.
Anwar Engineering RC Flag Wall
Research Systems
The results show that, flag
system has a significant effect
in reduction of lateral
displacement and storey drift
of tall buildings
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Aarthi Harini 2015 Behavior of This study reveals that the time
T R.C. Shear period, displacement, drift, base
Internation Wall with shear, stress distribution and the
G. Senthil al journal Different overall seismic response of the
Kumar for Openings structure is affected by the
research in under Seismic location of openings in shear
emerging Loads wall. The analysis led to the
science following conclusions.
and Staggered openings in shear
technology wall proved to be highly
advantageous and they were
found to provide better lateral
resistance than shear wall with
vertical opening.
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Bhargava Laxmi 2017 ANALYTICAL • Story stiffness was


Goli STUDY OF found to be increased as
Internation BUCKLING numbers and
Himath Kumar al Journal RESTRAINED configuration of BRB's
of Pure BRACED increased.
Yerramasetty and FRAMES UNDER
Lingeshwaran Applied LATERAL LOADS
Mathemati USING ETABS
Nagarathinam cs
Srujana Nandam
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal
Dr. H.M 2016 Comparative In this study systems like
Somasekharaiah study on lateral shear wall, masonry infill is
International force resisting applied to 20 storey
Research system for building. On comparing the
Journal of seismic loads. results obtained, shear wall
Engineering shows the good resistance
and for earthquake load
Technology compared to the other
(IRJET) systems which is consider
for the analysis
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Jian li 2020 Numerical and In the present study, the


theoretical seismic behaviour of
Feng Li Research analysis of concrete-filled double-steel-
Gate seismic plate (CFDSP) composite
Caiwei Liu behaviour of shear walls was numerically
CFDSP and theoretically investigated
composite
shear walls It was revealed that CFDSP
composite shear walls make
full use of the steel and
concrete materials and exhibit
excellent seismic
performance
Author Year/Jou Topic Findings
rnal

A. L. Gawate 2015 Carried out The outrigger and belt truss


research work are used to control excessive
J. P. Bhusari Internatio on the drift of high-rise building
nal behaviour of
Journal outrigger The author concluded that the
of structural optimum location for the
Science system for high single outrigger is of 0.47H
Technolo rise building. from bottom of building. When
gy & two outriggers provided then
Engineeri one outrigger is fixing at top
ng and second outrigger is at
(ISJTE) 0.3H from bottom of building.
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Lin Hai Han 2009 Seismic It was found that the


behaviour of composite frames
You Fu Yang Research concrete-filled cooperated well with the
Gate steel tubular core RC shear wall
frame to RC structure under
shear wall high- earthquakes, and the two
rise mixed building models exhibited
structures excellent seismic
performance.
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Marjan 2010 Study on Timber rivets in smaller


Popovski lateral load groups with custom made
resistance of brackets were found to be
World cross- effective connectors for CLT
Johannes conference laminated wall panels. Further research
Schneider on timber wood panels. in this field is needed to
engineering further clarify the use of
Matthias WCTE timber rivets in CLT.
Schweinsteige
r
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Albert Philip 2017 Seismic The objective of the project is to


analysis of carry out seismic analysis of
Dr. S. Elavenil Research high rise regular and irregular reinforced
Gate building with concrete building.
plan
irregularity.
From the results it is concluded
that story displacements
increases linearly with the
height of building
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Mohammed 2019 Seismic The model with retaining


Mohiuddin Behaviour Of wall considering lateral
Khan International RCC Multi earth pressure acting on
Journal of Storey Building the retaining wall show
Engineering With Retaining that the effect of
Shaik Developmen Wall earthquake on the building
Mohammed t and is more compared to
Javid Research building without retaining
(IJEDR) wall
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

N. Mightraj 2010 Seismic The lateral displacement


Behaviour of value increases when the
Prince Arulraj RCC Shear type of soil changes from hard
Indian Wall Under to medium and medium to
Geotechnical Different Soil soft for all the building frames.
Conference Conditions Since the base shear, axial
force, column moment and
lateral displacements
increase as the soil type
changes, soil structure
interaction must be suitably
considered while designing
frames for seismic forces
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

D. A. 2017 Comparison of As compare to bracing


Narkhede seismic system the shear wall gives
IJERT behaviour of more stiffness to the building
shear wall and
bracing system Shear wall is most preferred
in RC frame to medium high rise building
structure. to further improve the quality
of structure against seismic
load. Also, X bracing is most
suitable to reduce lateral
displacement, story shear,
defection.
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Mirza 2019 A Comparative Comparative study on seismic


Mahaboob Study on behaviour of G+15 high-rise
Baig, Internation Seismic building made with structural
al Journal Analysis and lightweight concrete and normal
C of Design of weight concrete for different soil
Mahalingam Innovative Structural conditions and different zones,
Technology Lightweight and by using LWC at critical
and Normal Weight conditions results shown that
Exploring Concrete High maximum bending moment and
Engineerin Rise Building shear force got reduced by 40%
g (IJITEE) and 34% respectively and it has
also been found that seismic
forces on the structure got
reduced considerably
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Kiran.T 2017 Study on As base shear depends on


multi-storey seismic weight of the building, the
Indian RC frame base shear of bare frame with
Journal of with shear shear wall and hexagrid system
research wall and was found to be more compared
Hexagrid to bare frame and bare frame with
system. shear wall.

As the number of storeys is


increased the resistance of the
structure to base force decreases
and as a result displacement
increases.
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Jayesh 2016 Analysis of 24 The circular plan of 30.7 m


Venkolath storey circular diameter is considered with
International building to find five different types of angles
Research the optimal of diagrid that is 36.8°, 56.3°,
Journal of diagrid angle to 66°, 77.5° and 83.6°.
Engineering minimize the
and lateral drift and The present study concluded
Technology displacement in that diagrid angle in the
(IRJET) a high rise region of 65° to 75° provides
building. more stiffness to the diagrid
structural system which
reflects the less top storey
displacement.
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Sanjay 2014 Effect of It is observed that for a


Sengupta different constant thickness of shear wall,
IJRET: thickness and reinforcement percentage
Internation corresponding increases with increase of both
al Journal reinforcement seismicity and number of
of percentages stories. It is also observed that
Research required for for all zones, the reinforcement
in shear walls on percentage increases if the
Engineerin multi-storey shear wall thickness increases
g and buildings for all for a certain range of thickness
Technology seismic zones in and then decreases for a certain
India range of thickness. From the
results concluded that increase
of shear wall thickness is not
always effective for earthquake
resistant design.
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

P. S. Lande 2018 Analysis of High The total base shear moment


Rise Building is increase as transfer floor
Parikshit Internatio with Transfer lies at higher level.
Takale nal Floor
Research Vertical location of transfer
Journal floors with respect to total
of height of the building has a
Engineeri significant effect on buildings
ng and performance; introduction of
Technolo the transfer floor in the lower
gy part of the structure (20-30%
(IRJET) of the total height of the
building from its foundation) is
better than having it in a
higher location.
Author Year/ Topic Findings
Journal

Nandeesh 2016 Comparative Shear wall had less top storey


J study of 52 displacement, storey drift than
IJRET: storey hyperbolic steel bracing systems in both
Internatio circular steel seismic zones. The steel
nal diagrid structural bracing system gave better
Journal of system performance against storey
Research rehabilitated at shear for both seismic zones
in central core with than shear walls system.
Engineeri shear wall and
ng and steel braced The shear wall systems act as a
Technolo frames monolithic structure and
gy performs against all aspects in
terms of maximum storey
displacement, storey drift and
time period.
INFERENCE

 FRAME ACTION OF COLUMN AND BEAM PROVIDES FLEXIBILTY


BUT HAVE MORE DEFLECTION

SHEAR WALL PROVIDES MORE STIFFNESS AND COST EFFICIENT

BRACING SYSTEM INCREASES STIFFNESS AND DUCTILITY ON


APPLICATION OF LATERAL LOAD

FRAMED TUBE ,TUBE AND TUBE AND TUBULAR STRUCTURE ARE


USED IN VERY TALL STRUCTURE

BRACING SYSTEM ARE ARE MOST SUITABLE FOR WIND LOAD AS


COMPARED TO EARTHQUAKE LOAD
RESEARCH GAP
EATHQUAKE LOAD INTENSITY IS MAXIMUM IN LOWER STOREY
OF BUILDING THEREFORE WE HAVE TO APPLY SYSTEMS WHICH
ARE MORE EFFECTIVE TO EARTQUAKE LOAD

TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE HEIGHT OF SHEAR WALL FOR


VARIOUS STOREYS OF BUILDING

TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVE POSITION OF BELT TRUSS


SYSTEM IN A HIGH RISE BUILDING

MAXIMUM OR MINIMUM AMOUNT OF REINFORCEMENT TO BE


APPLIED IN CONSTRUCTION OF SHEAR WALL FOR
DIFFERENT
FOR DIFFERENT THICKNESS OF WALL
OBJECTIVE
 TO STUDY THE BEHAVIOUR OF BUILDINGS WITH FRAMED SHEAR
WALL SYSTEM WITH DIFFERENT WALL THICKNESS

TO STUDY THE BEHAVIOUR OF BUILDING WITH FRAME TUBE SYSTEM

 BELT TRUSS SYSTEM

BRACING SYSTEM LIKE X BRACING INVERTED V BRACING WITH


VISCOUS DAMPERS

TO COMPARE THE RESULT AND PUT COMMENTS FORWARD


 

METHODOLOGY
 

 This modelling is done with help of ETABS software to compare and analyse
Results of two different building applied with two different type of load
resisting Method.
 
Building specification (storeys) G + 20 and G +25
 
Storey height 3.2 m
 
Seismic zone V
 

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy