PED 374 Feedback Reinforcement and Int Motivation
PED 374 Feedback Reinforcement and Int Motivation
PED 374 Feedback Reinforcement and Int Motivation
Introduction
I try never to plant a negative seed. I try to make every comment a positive comment. There s a lot of evidence to support positive management. Jimmy Johnson, College and Professional Football Coach To really win, you have to get every player to go beyond his capabilities. He must feel great about himself He must feel that his coaches or supervisors have total confidence in his ability, and he must feel that his weaknesses are small and his strengths are much bigger. You do that by positive reinforcement, making sure that no one thinks negatively at any time. Rick Pitino, Basketball Coach
Much of human interaction consists of attempts to influence other people s behaviors Influence attempts occur frequently in sport contexts:
Athletes interact with teammates, opponents, officials, and coaches Creating a good learning environment where athletes acquire technical skills to succeed
Psychology of coaching can be regarded as a set of strategies to increase ability to influence behaviors effectively.
Antecedents are the stimuli that control behavior. Antecedents that signal the likely consequences of particular behaviors are called discriminative stimuli Skill learning in sport often involves learning to read environment and respond. EX: basketball player learns how to set up the offense when the opponent switches from one defense to another
Response Consequences:
Remove
Extinction (weakens behaviors) Response cost punishment (weakens behavior)
Aversive Stimuli
Punishment works on the basis of raising fear; raises preoccupation with negatives Under threat of punishment, athletes view competition as more of a threat. Ironically, coaches with this style, increase likelihood of mistakes they are trying to avoid. Negative approach coaches usually succeed because:
are also able to communicate caring have very talented athletes recruit thick-skinned athletes thickare such skillful teachers, this overrides their negative approach
What About Response Cost?: Cost?: Fines, loss of privileges, benchings are examples removal of noncontigent reinforcers. Punishment through deprivation has 2 advantages over aversive punishment:
1. 2.
It does not create as much fear of failure The punisher is not modeling aggression or other negative behavior
Verbal compliments, smiles or other nonverbals; behaviors that convey approval; increased privileges; awards Finding effective reinforcers that work with a given athlete Making reinforcement depend on performance of a desired behavior Making sure the athlete understands WHY reinforcement is given
Effective requires:
How frequently should reinforcement be given? The Coach or Leader has 2 related challenges: 1. Athletes have to be instructed in skills until they master them 2. Coach needs to figure out how the athletes are to maintain a high proficiency level Initially, in skill development, reinforcement should be continuous Once the skill is well learned, reinforcement should be on a partial schedule. Timing of reinforcement is critical should be immediate It is natural to praise an athlete who has just made a great play; it is less natural to reinforce an athlete who tried but failed.
Positive approach is designed to foster a task-oriented motivational climate. taskAthletes in ego-oriented motivational climates: ego
Experience reinforcement upon outperforming others; punishment of unsuccessful performance; emphasis on social comparison
It can correct misperceptions (misattributions) It creates a stimulus for athletes to experience positive emotions It links well with personal and collective goal setting FB leads to increases in self-efficacy self-
Tell the athlete how to correct a mistake emphasize the good things that will happen as a result
1. 2.
SelfSelf-efficacy is defined as a person s judgment about their capability to successfully perform a specific task Two major principles:
Our efficacy beliefs affect our thought patterns and responses SelfSelf-efficacy is positively related to positive motivational patterns
High Self-Efficacy does not guarantee outcome, BUT increases Selfprobability that athlete will do well in terms of performance factors they can control Implications for Practice: 6 key determinants of self-efficacy: self-efficacy:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Most influential determinant previous successful performance Vicarious experience when we see another (similar) person succeed Verbal persuasion either ours, or someone else Our physiological state is it appraised as positive or negative? Our emotional state same thing as above Imagined experiences If you can see it, you can be it
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
When intrinsically motivated, we do activity for it s own sake Different types of motivation vary according to their level of selfselfdetermination: Athletes who are amotivated They have no sense of personal control; they have no real reasons for doing the activity External regulation Behavior is performed to satisfy external demand or stems from external reward Introjected regulation Athletes participate b/c inside they feel they HAVE to participate. Identified regulation Behavior is done out of free choice but as a means to an end Intrinsic Motivation The athlete feels competent, autonomous, and connected with others
(continued)