SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

MODULE-IV
Software Testing and Maintenance

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

School of Engineering,
PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY
 Module 4:Software Testing and Maintenance–
Application level
Software Testing-verification and validation, Test Strategies -
White Box Testing, Black box Testing. Automation Tools for
Testing.
Software Quality Assurance-Elements of software quality
assurance, SQA Tasks, Goals and Metrics, Software configuration
management- SCM process, SCM Tools (GitHub).
Maintenance- Characteristics of Software Maintenance, Software
Reverse Engineering, Software Maintenance Process Models.
Software Testing:
Testing is the process of exercising a program with the specific
intent of finding errors prior to delivery to the end user.

Requirement

Analysis
Where are We?
Design

Implement  Evaluating the

System
Test

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 3

 Verification and
Validation
 Verification refers to the set of tasks that ensure that software
correctly implements a specific function.
 Validation refers to a different set of tasks that ensure that the
software that has been built is traceable to customer
requirements.
 Boehm states this another way:
 Verification: "Are we building the product right?"
 Validation: "Are we building the right product?"

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 4

 Testing Strategy

System engineering

Analysis modeling
Design modeling

Code generation Unit test

Integration test
Validation test

System test

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 5

 Testing Strategies
 Unit testing - testing performed on each module
or block of code during development. Unit
Testing is normally done by the programmer who
writes the code.
 Integration testing - testing done before, during
and after integration of a new module into the
main software package. This involves testing of
each individual code module. One piece of
software can contain several modules which are
often created by several different programmers. It
is crucial to test each module's effect on the
entire program model. Performed by professional
testing team.
 System testing - testing done by a professional
testing team on the completed software product
before it is introduced to the market.
 Acceptance testing - beta testing of the product
Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 6
done by the end-users of the software.
 Manual and Automated
 Testing
Unit testing, Integration testing, System testing
and Acceptance testing can be performed
either manually or in automated ways
Manual Testing Automated Testing
Manual testing requires human intervention for test Automation Testing is use of tools to execute test
execution. cases

Manual testing will require skilled labour, long time & Automation Testing saves time, cost and
will imply high costs. manpower. Once recorded, it's easier to run an
automated test suite

Any type of application can be tested manually, Automated testing is recommended only for stable
certain testing types like ad-hoc and monkey testing systems and is mostly used for System Testing
are more suited for manual execution.

Manual testing can be become repetitive and boring. The boring part of executing same test cases time
and again, is handled by automation software in
Automation Testing.
Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 7
 Black Box Testing (Functional Testing)
• Uses only the Specification document to identify test cases.
• Knowing the specified function a component has been designed
for.
• Tests conducted at the interface of the component.

Set of Inputs Set of Outputs

Black Box
Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 8
 Black Box Testing
Advantages
• Independent of how the software is implemented.

• If implementation changes, test cases are still useful.

• Test case development can occur in parallel with the

implementation.

Disadvantages:
• Redundancies may exist among test cases.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 9

 White Box Testing (Structural Testing)
• Structural testing uses the programs source code
(implementation) as the basis of test case identification.
• Requires knowledge of internal workings of a component.
• Test cases exercise specific sets of condition, loops, etc.

Advantages:
• Provides more coverage in testing conditions and decisions.
• Reveals hidden errors during coding.
Disadvantages:
• Missed cases in the code are obviously missed during testing too.
• In-depth knowledge of the programming language is needed.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 10

 • White Box
Test Case Design
• Control Flow Graph
• Cyclomatic Complexity
• Basis Path Testing
• Black Box
• Equivalence Classes
• Boundary Value Analysis

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 11

 Introduction to White Box
• Test Engineers have access to the source code.
Testing
• Typical at the Unit Test level as the programmers have
knowledge of the internal logic of code.
• Tests are based on coverage of:
• Code statements;
• Branches;
• Paths;
• Conditions.
• Most of the testing techniques are based on Control Flow
Graph (denoted as CFG) of a code fragment.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 12

• An
Control Flow
abstract representation of a structured
Graph
program/function/method.
• Consists of two major components:
• Node:
• Represents a stretch of sequential code statements
with no branches.
• Directed Edge (also called arc):
• Represents a branch, alternative path in execution.
• Path:
• A collection of Nodes linked with Directed Edges.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 13

 Simple Examples of CFG

Statement1; Can be
Statement2; represented as
Statement3; one node as there 1
Statement4; is no branch.

CFG

Statement1; 1 T
Statement2; 3
1 2
if X < 10 then 2
Statement3; 3 F
else
4
CFG
Statement4; 4
Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 14
 More Examples of CFG

1 T
if X > 0 then 2
Statement1; 2 1 4
else
Statement2; 3 F 3
CFG

while X < 10 { 1
Statement1; 2 1 T
2 3 4
X++; } 3

CFG

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 15

• A CFG should have:
Notation Guide for CFG
• 1 entry arc (known as a directed edge, too).
• 1 exit arc.
• All nodes should have:
• At least 1 entry arc.
• At least 1 exit arc.
• A Logical Node that does not represent any actual statements, can
be added as a joining point for several incoming edges.
• Represents a logical closure.
• Example:
• Node 4 in the if-then-else example from previous slide.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 16

 Example: Minimum
Element

min = A[0];
1
1
I = 1;

2
2
while (I < N) { F T
if (A[I] < min) 3 3
min = A[I]; 4 F T
I = I + 1; 5
5 4
}
print min 6
6

CFG

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 17

 Number of Paths through CFG
• Given a program, how do we exercise all statements and branches
at least once?
• Translating the program into a CFG, an equivalent question is:
• Given a CFG, how do we cover all arcs and nodes at least once?
• Since a path is a trail of nodes linked by arcs, this is similar to ask:
• Given a CFG, what is the set of paths that can cover all arcs and nodes?

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 18

 Number of Paths through CFG – Example

T
3
1 1 2
F
4
CFG CFG

 Only one path is  Two paths are needed:

needed: [ 1 ] [1–2–4]
[1–2–3–4]

T
2
1 4  Two paths are needed:
[1–2–4]
F 3 [1–3–4]
CFG

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 19

 Basis Path Testing
Path Testing: Testing designed to execute all or selected
paths through a computer program.
Branch Testing: Testing designed to execute each outcome
of each decision point in a computer program.
Basis Path Testing: is a hybrid between path testing and
branch testing. It fulfills the requirements of branch testing
& also tests all of the independent paths that could be used
to construct any arbitrary path through the computer
program

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 20

 Basis Path Testing
• A generalized technique to find out the number of paths
needed (known as “cyclomatic complexity”) to cover all
arcs and nodes in CFG.
• Steps:
1. Draw the CFG for the code fragment.
2. Compute the cyclomatic complexity number C, for the CFG.
3. Find at most C paths that cover the nodes and arcs in a CFG,
also known as Basis Paths Set.
4. Design test cases to force execution along paths in the Basis
Paths Set.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 21

 Step 1 – Draw CFG

min = A[0]; 1
I = 1;
2
while (I < N) { F T
if (A[I] < min)
3
min = A[I]; F T
I = I + 1;
5 4
}
print min 6

CFG

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 22

 Step 2 – Compute Cyclomatic Complexity

1
 Cyclomatic complexity =
2
F T  The number of ‘regions’ in the
3 graph;
F T OR
5 4  The number of predicates + 1.

CFG

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 23

 Step 2 – Compute Cyclomatic Complexity

1  Region: Enclosed area in

the CFG.
 Do not forget the
2
F T outermost region.
 In this example:
3
F T  3 Regions (see the
circles with different
5 4 colors).
 Cyclomatic Complexity
6
=3
 Alternative way in next
CFG
slide.
Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 24
Step 2 – Compute Cyclomatic Complexity

 Predicates:
 Nodes with multiple
1 exit arcs.
 Corresponds to
2 branch/conditional
F T
statement in
3 program.
F T  In this example:
5 4  Predicates = 2
• (Node 2 and 3)
6  Cyclomatic
Complexity
CFG
=2+1
=3
 Step 3 – Find Basis Path Set
 Independent path:
 An executable or realizable path through the graph
from the start node to the end node that has not been
traversed before.
 Must move along at least one arc that has not been yet
traversed (an unvisited arc).
 The objective is to cover all statements in a program by
independent paths.
 The number of independent paths to discover
<= cyclomatic complexity number.
 Decide the Basis Path Set:
 It is the maximal set of independent paths in the flow
graph.
 NOT a unique set.
 Step 3 – Example

• 1-2-3-5 can be the first independent path; 1-2-4-5 is another; 1-2-3-5-2-4-5 is one
more.
• There are only these 3 independent paths. The basis path set is then having 3 paths.
• Alternatively, if we had identified 1-2-3-5-2-4-5 as the first independent path, there
would be no more independent paths.
• The number of independent paths therefore can vary according to the order we
identify them.
 Step 3

 Cyclomatic complexity
1 = 3.
 Need at most 3
2 independent paths to
F T cover the CFG.
3  In this example:
F T
 [1–2–6]
5 4  [1–2–3–5–2–6]
 [ 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 2 – 6]
6

CFG
 Step 4 – Design Test Cases
 Prepare a test case for each independent path.
 In this example:
 Path: [ 1 – 2 – 6 ]
• Test Case: A = { 5, …}, N = 1
• Expected Output: 5
 Path: [ 1 – 2 – 3 – 5 – 2 – 6 ]
• Test Case: A = { 5, 9, … }, N = 2
• Expected Output: 5
 Path: [ 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 2 – 6]
• Test Case: A = { 8, 6, … }, N = 2
• Expected Output: 6
 These tests will result a complete decision and
statement coverage of the code.
 Black Box Testing

 Test Engineers have no access to the source

code or documentation of internal working.
 The “Black Box” can be:
 A single unit.

 A subsystem.

 The whole system.

 Tests are based on:

 Specification of the “Black Box”.

 Providing inputs to the “Black Box” and

inspect the outputs.

Inputs Component Outputs

Under Test
 Black Box Testing

 Two techniques will be covered for the

black box testing in this course:
 Equivalence Partition;
 Boundary Value Analysis.
 Equivalence
Partition
 To ensure the correct behavior of a
“black box”, both valid and invalid
cases need to be tested.
 Example:
 Given the method below:

boolean isValidMonth(int m)

Functionality: check m is [1..12]

Output:
- true if m is 1 to 12
- false otherwise
Is there a better way to test other than testing all
integer values [-231, …, 231-1] ?
 Equivalence
Partition
 Observations:
 For a method, it is common to have a number
of inputs that produce similar outcomes.
 Testing one of the inputs should be as good
as exhaustively testing all of them.
 So, pick only a few test cases from each
“category” of input that produce the same
output.
1, 5, 9, TRUE
isValidMonth( int m )
11, 12

All inputs here

produce TRUE.
 Equivalence
Partition
 Partition input data
into equivalence
classes. Input Test Data
 Data in each
equivalence class:
 Likely to be treated Component
equally by a
reasonable
algorithm.
 Produce same
output state, i.e., Result
valid/invalid.
 Derive test data for
each class.
 Example
 For the isisValid(Month)
ValidMonth example:
 Input value [1 … 12] should get a similar
treatment.
 Input values lesser than 1, larger than 12
are two other groups.
 Three partitions:
 [ -∞ ... 0 ] should produce an invalid
result
 [ 1 … 12 ] should produce a valid result
 [ 13 … ∞ ] should produce an invalid result
 Pick one value from each partition as test case:
 E.g., {-12, 5, 15}
 Reduce the number of test cases significantly.
 Example - 2

Problem statement for Triangle Problem

The program reads three input numbers
that represent the lengths of the three
sides of a triangle. Based on these three
input values, the program determines
whether the triangle is scalene (that is, it
has three unequal sides), isosceles (two
equal sides), or equilateral (three equal
sides). The program displays the result on
 Triangle
Problem
Input: Three integers a, b, c which represent the sides
of a triangle.
Output: Type of triangle: “Equilateral”, “Isosceles”,
“Scalene”, or “Not a Triangle”.
The integers must satisfy the following conditions:
C1: a<b+c
C2: b<a+c
C3: c<a+b
If all three sides are equal -> Equilateral triangle
If exactly one pair of sides are equal -> Isosceles
triangle
No pair of sides are equal -> Scalene triangle
 Triangle
Problem
 Example: High-level classes for the Triangle Problem:

 Class 1: Equilateral Triangle. Test case is triple

(5,5,5)
 Class 2: Isosceles Triangle. Test case is triple (5,5,6)
 Class 3: Scalene Triangle. Test case is triple (5,6,7)
 Class 4: Not a Triangle. Test case is triple (3,15,11)
 Boundary Value
Analysis
 It has been found that most errors
are caught at the boundary of the
equivalence classes.
 Not surprising, as the end points of
the boundary are usually used in the
code for checking:
 E.g., checking K is in range [ X … Y ):
Easy to make
if (K >= X && K <= Y) mistake on the
comparison.
...
 Using Boundary Value
 Analysis
If the component specifies a range, [ X … Y]
 Four values should be tested:
• Valid: X and Y
• Invalid: Just below X (e.g., X – 1)
• Invalid: Just above Y (e.g., Y + 1)
 E.g., [1 … 12]
• Test Data: {0, 1, 12, 13}
 Similar for open interval (X … Y), i.e., X and Y
not inclusive.
 Four values should be tested:
• Invalid: X and Y
• Valid: Just above X (e.g., X + 1)
• Valid: Just below Y (e.g., Y - 1)
 E.g., (100 … 200)
• Test Data: {100, 101, 199, 200}
Boundary Value Test Cases for Triangle Problem

Triangle Side boundary conditions:

Each side between 1 and 200

A, B, C sides are taking values

alternatively, while other two sides are
having nominal values

- Min (1)
- Min+1 (2)
- Nominal (100)
- Max-1 (199)
- Max (200)
 Example 1 - Searching

boolean Search(
List aList, int key)

Precondition:
-aList has at least one element

Postcondition:
- true if key is in the aList
- false if key is not in aList
Equivalence Classes for Search
 Sequence with a single value:
 key found.
 key not found.
 Sequence of multi values:
 key found:
• First element in sequence.
• Last element in sequence.
• “Middle” element in sequence.
 key not found.
 Test Data for Search

Test aList Key Expected

Case Result
1 [ 123 ] 123 True

2 [ 123 ] 456 False

3 [ 1, 6, 3, -4, 5 ] 1 True

4 [ 1, 6, 3, -4, 5 ] 5 True

5 [ 1, 6, 3, -4, 5 ] 3 True

6 [ 1, 6, 3, -4, 5 ] 123 False

 Example 2 – Simple Shopping Scenario
Let us consider a simple shopping scenario -
• Shop for $1000 and get 5% discount
• Shop for $2000 and get 7% discount
• Shop for $3000 and above and get 10% discount.
 Example 2 – Simple Shopping Scenario
• Equivalence partitioning - We can divide the input into four partitions,
amount<0, 0 to 1000, 1001 to 2000, 2001 to 3000 and then 3001 and above.
• We will keep things simple for now and will not go into details like the max
amount one can shop for, or what about cents and all that stuff.
• Adding the flavor of boundary value to the above partitions - the boundary
values would be 0, 1000, 1001, 2000, 2001, 3000 and 3001. In boundary
value analysis, immediate upper and lower values too are recommended to
be tested, so we will include -1, 1 and 999. These are the values that can tell
behavior the software for almost entire range of input values, but there can
be other issues in software. For that reason, other input values too can be
considered.
 Example 3 – Quadratic Equation
• For example, suppose we are testing a function that uses the quadratic
formula to determine the two roots of a second-degree polynomial ax2+bx+c.
For simplicity, assume that we are going to work only with real numbers, and
print an error message if it turns out that the two roots are complex numbers
(numbers involving the square root of a negative number).

• We can come up with test data for each of the four cases, based on values of
the polynomial's discriminant (b2-4ac).
 Software Quality Assurance
(SQA)
Contents
1. Elements of SQA
2. Role of the SQA Group
3. SQA Goals
4. Statistical SQA
5. Six-Sigma for Software Engineering
6. Software Safety

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 48

 Elements of Software Quality Assurance (SQA)

 Standards
 Reviews and Audits
 Testing
 Error/defect collection and analysis
 Change management
 Education
 Vendor management
 Security management
 Safety
 Risk management

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 49

 Role of the SQA Group - I
 Prepares an SQA plan for a project.
 The plan identifies
• evaluations to be performed
• audits and reviews to be performed
• standards that are applicable to the project
• procedures for error reporting and tracking
• documents to be produced by the SQA group
• amount of feedback provided to the software project
team
 Participates in the development of the project’s
software process description.
 The SQA group reviews the process description for
compliance with organizational policy, internal
software standards, externally imposed standards
(e.g., ISO-9001), and other parts of the software
project plan.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 50

 Role of the SQA Group - II

 Reviews software engineering activities to verify

compliance with the defined software process.
 identifies, documents, and tracks deviations from the
process and verifies that corrections have been
made.
 Audits designated software work products to verify
compliance with those defined as part of the software
process.
 reviews selected work products; identifies,
documents, and tracks deviations; verifies that
corrections have been made
 periodically reports the results of its work to the
project manager.
 Ensures that deviations in software work and work
products are documented and handled according to a
documented procedure.
 Records any noncompliance and reports to senior
management.
 Noncompliance items are tracked until they are
Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 51
resolved.
 SQA Goals

 Requirements quality. The correctness, completeness, and

consistency of the requirements model will have a strong
influence on the quality of all work products that follow.
 Design quality. Every element of the design model should be
assessed by the software team to ensure that it exhibits high
quality and that the design itself conforms to requirements.
 Code quality. Source code and related work products (e.g.,
other descriptive information) must conform to local coding
standards and exhibit characteristics that will facilitate
maintainability.
 Quality control effectiveness. A software team should apply
limited resources in a way that has the highest likelihood of
achieving a high quality result.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 52

 Software Quality Goals, Attributes and
Metrics

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 53

 Statistical SQA

Product Collect information on all defects

& Process Find the causes of the defects
Move to provide fixes for the process

measurement

... an understanding of how

to improve quality ...

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 54

 Statistical SQA

 Information about software errors and defects is

collected and categorized.
 An attempt is made to trace each error and defect to its
underlying cause (e.g., non-conformance to
specifications, design error, violation of standards, poor
communication with the customer).
 Using the Pareto principle (80 percent of the defects can
be traced to 20 percent of all possible causes), isolate the
20 percent (the vital few).
 Once the vital few causes have been identified, move to
correct the problems that have caused the errors and
defects.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 55

 Software Safety
 Software safety is a software quality
assurance activity that focuses on
the identification and assessment of
potential hazards that may affect
software negatively and cause an
entire system to fail.
 If hazards can be identified early in
the software process, software design
features can be specified that will
either eliminate or control potential
hazards.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 56

 Software Configuration
Management (SCM)

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

School of Engineering, Presidency
University
 What is Software Configuration Management (SCM)

SCM is the task of tracking and controlling changes in

the software.

If something in the project goes wrong, SCM can determine

what was changed and who changed it.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 58

 What can Change in a Project?

changes in
business requirements
changes in
technical requirements
changes in
user requirements other
documents

software models
Project
Plan
data
Test
code

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 59

 Key aspects of SCM

Key aspects of SCM include:

1. Establishing a Baseline for the Project

2. Establishing a SCM Repository for the Project

3. Establishing the SCM Process which includes

a. Maintaining Change Control

b. Maintaining Version Control

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 60

 1. Establishing a Baseline

• The IEEE (IEEE Std. No. 610.12-1990) defines a baseline

as:
• A specification or product that has been formally reviewed and agreed
upon, that thereafter serves as the basis for further development, and
that can be changed only through formal change control procedures.

• A Baseline is a milestone in the development of software

that is marked by the delivery of one or more software
configuration items and the approval of these SCIs that is
obtained through a formal technical review

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 61

 1. Establishing a Baseline

modified
SCIs
Project database
approved
Software Formal
engineering SCIs technical SCIs
tasks reviews

stored

SCIs

extracted
SCM
SCIs
controls

BASELINES:
System Specification
Software Requirements
Design Specification
Source Code
Test Plans/Procedures/Data
Operational System

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 62

 2. Establishing a SCM Repository

• The SCM repository is the set of mechanisms and data

structures that allow a software team to manage change
in an effective manner
• The repository performs or precipitates the following
functions:
• Data integrity
• Information sharing
• Tool integration
• Data integration
• Document standardization

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 63

 2. SCM Repository Contents

u se -case s
b u sin e ss ru le s an aly sis m o d e l so u rce co d e
b u sin e ss fu n ct io n s sce n ario -b ase d d iag ram s o b je ct co d e
o rg an izat io n st ru ct u re flo w-o rie n t e d d iag ram s sy st e m b u ild in st ru ct io n s
in fo rm at io n arch it e ct u re class-b ase d d iag ram s
b e h av io ral d iag ram s Cons t ruc t ion
d e sig n m o d e l Cont e nt
arch it e ct u ral d iag ram s
Bus ine s s in t e rface d iag ram s
Cont e nt co m p o n e n t -le v e l d iag ram s
t e ch n ical m e t rics t e st case s
t e st scrip t s
t e st re su lt s
q u alit y m e t rics
Mode l
Cont e nt
V&V
Cont e nt

Proje c t
Ma na ge me nt
p ro je ct e st im at e s Cont e nt
p ro je ct sch e d u le
SCM re q u ire m e n t s
Pro je ct Plan
ch an g e re q u e st s Doc ume nt s SCM/ SQA Plan
ch an g e re p o rt s
Sy st e m Sp e c
SQA re q u ire m e n t s
Re q u ire m e n t s Sp e c
p ro je ct re p o rt s/ au d it re p o rt s
De sig n Do cu m e n t
p ro je ct m e t rics
Te st Plan an d Pro ce d u re
Su p p o rt d o cu m e n t s
Use r m an u al

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 64

 3. Establishing the SCM Process for the Project

Software
Vm.n

reporting

configuration auditing

version control

change control

identification

SCIs SCI – Software

Configuration
Item

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University 65

 3.1 Identification of SCI

• SCI can include:

• Business content
• Model content
• Construction content
• V&V (Verification and Validation) content
• Project Documents

[Refer ‘SCM Repository Content’ diagram on Slide 8]

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University

 3.2 Change Control Process

need for change is recognized

change request from user

developer evaluates

change report is generated

change control authority decides

request is queued for action

change request is denied
user is informed
change
change control
control process—II
process—II

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University

 3.2 Change Control Process

assign people to SCIs

check-out SCIs

make the change

review/audit the change

establish a “baseline” for testing

change
change control
control process—III
process—III

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University

 3.2 Change Control Process

perform SQA and testing activities

check-in the changed SCIs

promote SCI for inclusion in next release

rebuild appropriate version

review/audit the change

include all changes in release

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University
 3.3 Version Control

Version control is a system that records changes to a file or

set of files over time so that you can recall
specific versions later.
Types: Centralized and Distributed Version Controls

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University

 3.3 Numbers in a Version

A Version typically comprises of three numbers:

• Major Version Number
• Minor Version Number
• Patch Number

Version Example
Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University
 3.3 Versioning Example

Common Language Runtime

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University
Versions
 3.3 Popular Version Control Tools

Popular Version Control tools:

1. GIT
2. Team Foundation Server (Microsoft)
3. Rational Clear Case (IBM)
4. Visual SourceSafe (Microsoft)

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University

 3.4 SCM Auditing

SCM Auditing answers the following questions:

• What is the SQA Plan followed for project?
• How many SCIs were identified?
• How many change requests were handled?

Change SQA
Requests Plan
SCIs

SCM Audit
Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University
 3.5 Reporting

The reporting aspect of the SCM process provides timely

information on the status of the changes requested and the
SCIs to the people who may be affected by the changes.

These could be the people requesting for changes, the

developers, the project manager, and the senior
management.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University

Software Maintenance Process
Model
What is Software Maintenance?

• software maintenance is widely accepted as part of

Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC).

• It is the process of modifying and updating software

application after its delivery to improve its performance,
correct any new defects and adapt the product according
to the modified environment.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University

77
The Purpose of Software Maintenance

The purpose of software maintenance is to preserve the value of

software over time, which can accomplished by:

•Expanding the customer base.

•Enhancing software’s capabilities.
•Omitting obsolete capabilities.
•Employing newer technology.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University

78
 Process of Software Maintenance:
 There are seven phases of Software Maintenance process:
• Identification Phase: In this phase, the requests for modifications in
the software are identified and analyzed.
• Analysis Phase: The feasibility and scope of each validated
modification request are determined and a plan is prepared to
incorporate the changes in the software.
• Design Phase: The new modules that need to be replaced or modified
are designed as per the requirements specified in the earlier stages.
• Implementation Phase: The actual modification in the software
code are made, new features that support the specifications of the
present software are added, and the modified software is installed.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University

79
 Continued…
System Testing Phase: Regression testing is performed on the
modified system to ensure that no defect, error or bug is left
undetected. Integration testing is also carried out between new
modules and the system.
Acceptance Testing Phase: Acceptance testing is performed on the
fully integrated system by the user or by the third party specified by
the end user.
Delivery Phase: Once the acceptance testing is successfully
accomplished, the modified system is delivered to the users. In
addition to this, the user is provided proper consisting of manuals
and help files that describe the operation of the software along with its
hardware specifications. The final testing of the system is done by the
client after the system is delivered.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University

80
 Software Maintenance Models

To overcome internal as well as external problems of the software,

Software maintenance models are proposed. These models use
different approaches and techniques to simplify the process of
maintenance as well as to make is cost effective.

Dept. of CSE, SOE, Presidency University

81
 Quick-Fix Model:

• This is an ad hoc approach used for

maintaining the software system.
• The objective of this model is to identify the
problem and then fix it as quickly as possible.
• The advantage is that it performs its work
quickly and at a low cost.
• This model is an approach to modify the
software code with little consideration for its
impact on the overall structure of the software
system.
Iterative Enhancement Model
• Iterative enhancement model considers the changes made to the system are iterative
in nature.
• This model incorporates changes in the software based on the analysis of the
existing system.
• It assumes complete documentation of the software is available in the beginning.
• Moreover, it attempts to control complexity and tries to maintain good design.
The Re-use Oriented Model

• The parts of the old/existing system that are appropriate for reuse are identified and
understood.
• These parts are then go through modification and enhancement, which are done on
the basis of the specified new requirements.
• The final step of this model is the integration of modified parts into the new system.
 Boehm’s Model
• Boehm’s Model performs
maintenance process based on the
economic models and principles.
• It represents the maintenance
process in a closed loop cycle,
wherein changes are suggested and
approved first and then are
executed.
Taute’s Maintenance Model
Named after the person who proposed the
model, Taute’s model is a typical maintenance
model that consists of eight phases in cycle
fashion.
The process of maintenance begins by
requesting the change and ends with its
operation.
The phases of Taute’s Maintenance Model
are:
The phases of Taute’s Maintenance Model are:

1.Change request Phase.

2.Estimate Phase.
3.Schedule Phase.
4.Programming Phase.
5.Test Phase.
6.Documentation Phase.
7.Release Phase.
8.Operation Phase.
Reverse engineering
• Software Reverse Engineering is a process of recovering the design,
requirement specifications and functions of a product from an analysis
of its code. Builds a program database and generates information from
code.
• To facilitate the maintenance work by improving the under
standability of a system and produce the necessary documents for a
legacy system.
Goals are
• Cope with Complexity.
• Recover lost information.
• Detect side effects.
• Synthesise higher abstraction.
• Facilitate Reuse.
Steps of Software Reverse Engineering
1. Collection Information
2. Examining the information
3. Extracting the structure
4. Recording the functionality
5. Recording data flow
6. Recording control flow
7. Review extracted design
8. Generate documentation
Steps of Software Reverse Engineering
1. Collection Information:
Collecting all possible information (i.e., source design documents
etc.) about the software.
2. Examining the information:
The information collected in step-1 as studied so as to get familiar
with the system.
3. Extracting the structure:
Identification of program structure in the form of structure chart
where each node corresponds to some routine.
4.Recording the functionality:
Processing details of each module of the structure, charts are
recorded using structured language like decision table, etc.
Steps of Software Reverse Engineering
5. Recording data flow:
From the information extracted in step-3 and step-4, set of data flow
diagrams are derived to show the flow of data among the processes.
6. Recording control flow:
High level control structure of the software is recorded.
7. Review extracted design:
Design document extracted is reviewed several times to ensure
consistency and correctness. It also ensures that the design represents
the program.
8. Generate documentation:
Complete documentation including SRS, design document, history,
overview, etc. are recorded for future use.
Reverse Engineering Tools
• CIAO and CIA: A graphical navigator for software and
web repositories along with a collection of Reverse
Engineering tools.
• Rigi: A visual software understanding tool.
• Bunch: A software clustering/modularization tool.
• GEN++: An application generator to support development
of analysis tools for the C++ language.
• PBS: Software Bookshelf tools for extracting and
visualizing the architecture of programs.
Forward engineering
• Method of creating or making an application with the help of the
given requirements
• known as Renovation and Reclamation
• requires high proficiency skills
• takes more time to construct or develop an application
• a technique of creating high-level models or designs to make in
complexities and low-level information
• Forward Engineering applies of all the software engineering process
which contains SDLC to recreate associate existing application
Forward Engineering
Reverse Engineering
What is a maturity model?
‘A maturity model is a model with which organizations can judge their (software
engineering, hrm, service, etc.) process (including comparing it to other organizations) and
based on this judgment can improve their process.’
– started in 1986 by the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) (Carnegie Mellon
University) and the Mitre Corporation
– SEI started with a Process Maturity Framework and a maturity questionnaire
– the software Framework developed into the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) for
Software (1991)
– Revised maturity framework (CMMI) introduced in 2001

97
 Process Maturity Framework
Goal is the improvement of the software engineering process
– Success should not be based on incidental individual achievements
– Success should be based on repeatable and proven successful work
methods
Immature Mature
Software Software
Organization Organization

-No objective basis for judgment of

-Organization wide knowledge to
product quality manage software development,
- No objective basis for improvement of employment and improvement
product or process quality - Processes are ‘fit-for-use’
- Reviews and tests are often skipped - Processes are being adapted to the
when projects run behind schedule situation
- Ad hoc management -Tasks and responsibilities are clear for
the project and anyone in the
organization
98
Software Process
Software Process:

‘the whole of activities, methods, practices, communication

and changes that people use in order to develop and
maintain software and associated products (e.g. plans,
design documents, code, test cases and user manuals)’

CMM gives an organization a way

to get and improve control over the software
process and provides it with a route to achieve excellence
in software engineering

99
Fundamental concepts for
Process Maturity
Software Process Capability
– How good it can predict the expected outcome of a next
software project
Software Process Performance
– Actual results of a software project
Software Process Maturity
– The level in which a software process is explicitly defined,
managed, measured and controlled in order to achieve results
Software Process Institutionalization
– The level in which the software process is institutionalized with
respect to methods, standards and organizational structure

100
 Levels of software maturity
Maturity level:
– A well defined level on the way to achieve an adult, a
mature software process
– A foundation for realizing continuous improvements
– Every level contains a group of process goals that, when
stable, form an important part of the software process
– Every level leads to the improvement of the process
capability of the organization

101
The staged CMMI model

Level 5
Optimizing

Level 4
Quantitatively
managed

Level 3
Defined

Level 2
Managed

Level 1
Initial

102
 Initial
The (1)process can be described as ad-hoc, or even
software
chaotic
There are practically no processes defined
Success depends on individual input and achievements
The software process is not predictable regarding results
Schedules, budget, functionality and product quality is not
predictable
Works disastrous in crises situations
Can be successful in highly innovative environment
(e.g. start of the web-design world)

103
 Managed
The (2)management procedures are used
basic project
Costs, schedules en functionality are ‘tracked’
Planning and managing of new projects are based on experience
with comparable projects
Needed process discipline is enforced such that earlier success can
be repeated with building an comparable application
Software requirements and work products are ‘baselined’
Disciplined environment in which planning and tracking are stable
and thus previous successes can be repeated

104
 Definedfor(3)
Processes management and software engineering are
documented, standardized and integrated in a standard software
development process
All projects use an approved, adapted version of the standard
software process for the development and maintenance of software
Processes are used to let software managers and engineers be more
effective
There is a group responsible for the software process
There is training in the software process
The software process is stable and well defined and is able to
operate more effectively

105
 Quantitatively
Detailed metrics of themanaged (4) and quality of products
software processes
are gathered
Quantitative goals are set for the software process and the product
quality
Use is made of a software process database in which the metrics
are gathered and analyzed
Projects have a control over the software process and product
quality such that the can work in defined limits
Risks of development in new technical environments are
recognized and managed
Software process is predictable and trends can be predicted

106
 Optimizing
Continuously (5) process improvements are realized by
software
quantitatively feedback of the process and by trying out of
innovative ideas and technologies
The whole organization is focused on continuous improvement
Data regarding performance of the processes are used for cost-
benefit analyses
Innovations that make use of the best software engineering
practices are identified and spread over the whole organization
Software project teams analyze errors in order to find out how to
improve
‘Lessons learned’ are shared with other projects (team rooms,
Communities of Practice)

107
 Operational use of CMM
How do you determine in practice the maturity of an organization?

Maturity
Indicate
Level
Contain
Process
Capability Key Process
Achieve Areas
Organized by
Goals
Common
Address Features Contain

Implementation or Key
Institutionalization

Describe
Practices
Infrastructure or
Activities

108
Key Process Areas Optimizing (5)
-Process change management
-Technology change management
-Defect prevention
Quantitatively
Managed (4) -Software quality management
-Quantitative process management
-Peer reviews
-Intergroup coordination
Defined (3) -Software product engineering
-Integrated software management
-Training program
-Organization process definition
Managed (2) -Organization process focus

-Software Configuration Management

-Software Quality Assurance
-Software Subcontract Management
Initial (1) -Software project tracking & oversight
-Software project planning
-Requirements Management 109
 Example
Maturity Level 2
Managed
Indicates
Contains Key Process Area
Disciplined
Processes Software
Achieves Project Planning
Organized by Common
Software estimates are Feature
Activities
documented for use
Performed
Address
in planning and tracking Contain Key Practice

ImplementationActivity 9. Estimates for the size of t

software work products (or changes t
Describe
are derived according to
Activity a documented procedure
110