The document defines learning as a relatively permanent change in behavior resulting from experience, highlighting the distinction between learning and maturation. It discusses two primary models of learning: behavioral models, which focus on observable behaviors through classical and operant conditioning, and cognitive models, which emphasize knowledge acquisition and mental processes. Key concepts include classical conditioning, operant conditioning, reinforcement, shaping, observational learning, and learned helplessness.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views
unit-4-Learning
The document defines learning as a relatively permanent change in behavior resulting from experience, highlighting the distinction between learning and maturation. It discusses two primary models of learning: behavioral models, which focus on observable behaviors through classical and operant conditioning, and cognitive models, which emphasize knowledge acquisition and mental processes. Key concepts include classical conditioning, operant conditioning, reinforcement, shaping, observational learning, and learned helplessness.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 36
Unit 4: Learning
Definition of Learning: Any relatively permanent change in behavior (or behavior potential) resulting from experience. Learning comprises of following three elements:
i. A change in behavior, for better or worse
ii. Change that takes place through practice and experience not through growth and maturation iii. Change must be relatively permanent To understand when learning has occurred, we must differentiate maturational changes from improvements resulting from practice, which indicate that learning actually has occurred Models of Learning: 1. Behavioral models (classical and operant conditioning). Behavioral model view learning as behavior. The behavior is observable and can be measured. Behaviorist speak a great deal about stimulus response. The main elements of learning are the action or reactions that we take in response to stimuli present in the environment. 2. Cognitive model (social/observational learning). Cognitive model explain learning as the acquisition of knowledge and the processing of information. Cognitivist emphasize on learner’s thought in the process of learning. The main element of learning are our thinking, imagining, reasoning and remembering abilities. 1. Behavioral Models: i. Classical Conditioning ii. Operant Conditioning
iii. Classical Conditioning:
A type of learning in which a neutral stimulus comes to bring about a response after it is paired with a stimulus that naturally brings about that response. Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist accidently developed the principles of classical conditioning. He observed a curious phenomenon: The mere sight of the experimenter who normally brought the food, or even the sound of the experimenter’s footsteps, was enough to produce salivation in the dogs. Pavlov’s genius lay in his ability to recognize the implications of this discovery. He saw that the dogs were responding not only on the basis of a biological need (hunger) but also as a result of learning— or, as it came to be called, classical conditioning. Classical conditioning is a type of learning in which a neutral stimulus (such as the experimenter’s footsteps) comes to elicit a response after being paired with a stimulus (such as food) that naturally brings about that response. Neutral stimulus A stimulus that, before conditioning, does not naturally bring about the response of interest. Unconditioned stimulus (UCS) A stimulus that naturally brings about a particular response without having been learned. Unconditioned response (UCR) A response that is natural and needs no training (e.g., salivation at the smell of food). Conditioned stimulus (CS) A once neutral stimulus that has been paired with an unconditioned stimulus to bring about a response formerly caused only by the unconditioned stimulus. Conditioned response (CR) A response that, after conditioning, follows a previously neutral stimulus (e.g., salivation at the ringing of a bell) Figure (a), (b) and (c): The basic process of classical conditioning. (a) Before conditioning, the ringing of a bell does not bring about salivation—making the bell a neutral stimulus. In contrast, meat naturally brings about salivation, making the meat an unconditioned stimulus and salivation an unconditioned response. (b) During conditioning, the bell is rung just before the presentation of the meat. (c) Eventually, the ringing of the bell alone brings about salivation. We now can say that conditioning has been accomplished: The previously neutral stimulus of the bell is now considered a conditioned stimulus that brings about the conditioned response of salivation. Basic Principles of Classical Conditioning: a. Acquisition: The process by which a conditioned stimulus acquires the ability to elicit a conditioned response through repeated pairings of an unconditioned stimulus with the conditioned stimulus. b. Temporal arrangement of the CS–UCS pairings: Conditioning is also determined by temporal factor i.e the extent to which a conditioned stimulus precedes or follows the presentation of an unconditioned stimulus. Forward conditioning: The presentation of the conditioned stimulus always precedes the presentation of the unconditioned stimulus. A form of forward conditioning in which the onset of the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) begins while the conditioned stimulus (CS) is still present is delay conditioning. A form of forward conditioning in which the onset of the conditioned stimulus (CS) precedes the onset of the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) and the presentation of the CS and UCS does not overlap is trace conditioning. Simultaneous Conditioning: A form of conditioning in which the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) begin and end at the same time. Backward Conditioning: A type of conditioning in which the presentation of the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) precedes the presentation of the conditioned stimulus (CS). Research suggests that delay conditioning is generally the most effective method for establishing a conditioned response. This is because the conditioned stimulus helps predict forthcoming presentations of the unconditioned stimulus. Simultaneous and backward conditioning are usually the least effective procedures. c. Extinction: The process through which a conditioned stimulus gradually loses the ability to evoke conditioned responses when it is no longer followed by the unconditioned stimulus. It is the eventual decline and disappearance of a conditioned response in the absence of an unconditioned stimulus is known as extinction. Let’s consider the behavior of one of Pavlov’s dogs to see why this is true. After many presentations of a bell (conditioned stimulus) in the absence of meat (unconditioned stimulus), the dog no longer salivates in response to the bell. In other words, extinction has occurred. But if the conditioned stimulus (the bell) and the unconditioned stimulus (the meat) are again paired after the conditioned response of salivation has been extinguished, salivation will return very quickly—a process termed reconditioning. ii. Operant Conditioning: A process through which organisms learn to repeat behaviors that yield positive outcomes or permit them to avoid or escape from negative outcomes. Some basic concepts of operant conditioning: a. Reinforcement: Thorndike’s Law of Effect: If you placed a hungry cat in a cage and then put a small piece of food outside the cage, just beyond the cat’s reach, chances are that the cat would eagerly search for a way out of the cage. The cat might first claw at the sides or push against an opening. Suppose, though, you had rigged things so that the cat could escape by stepping on a small paddle that released the latch to the door of the cage (see Figure 1). Eventually, as it moved around the cage, the cat would happen to step on the paddle, the door would open, and the cat would eat the food. What would happen if you then returned the cat to the box? The next time, it would probably take a little less time for the cat to step on the paddle and escape. After a few trials, the cat would deliberately step on the paddle as soon as it was placed in the cage. according to Edward L. Thorndike (1932), the cat would have learned that pressing the paddle was associated with the desirable consequence of getting food. Thorndike summarized that relationship by formulating the law of effect : Responses that lead to satisfying consequences are more likely to be repeated. B. F. Skinner with a Skinner box used to study operant conditioning. Laboratory rats learn to press the lever in order to obtain food, which is delivered in the tray Reinforcement: The process by which a stimulus increases the probability that a preceding behavior will be repeated. Here, in Skinner Box experiment, pressing the lever is more likely to occur again because of the stimulus of food. Positive Reinforcer and negative reinforcer: A positive rein forcer is a stimulus added to the environment that brings about an increase in a preceding response. If food, water, money, or praise is provided after a response, it is more likely that that response will occur again in the future In contrast, a negative reinforcer refers to an unpleasant stimulus whose removal leads to an increase in the probability that a preceding response will be repeated in the future. For example, if you have an itchy rash (an unpleasant stimulus) that is relieved when you apply a certain brand of ointment, you are more likely to use that ointment the next time you have an itchy rash. Note that negative reinforcement is not the same as punishment. Punishment refers to a stimulus that decreases the probability that a prior behavior will occur again. Unlike negative reinforcement, which produces an increase in behavior, punishment reduces the likelihood of a prior response. If we receive a shock that is meant to decrease a certain behavior, then we are receiving punishment, but if we are already receiving a shock and do something to stop that shock, the behavior that stops the shock is considered to be negatively reinforced. In the first case, the specific behavior is appropriate to decrease because of the punishment; in the second, it is likely to increase because of the negative reinforcement There are two types of punishment: positive punishment and negative punishment. Positive punishment weakens a response through the application of an unpleasant stimulus. For instance, spanking a child for misbehaving or spending ten years in jail for committing a crime is positive punishment. In contrast, negative punishment consists of the removal of something pleasant. For instance, when a teenager is told she is “grounded” and will no longer be able to use the family car because of her poor grades, or when an employee is informed that he has been demoted with a cut in pay because of a poor job evaluation, negative punishment is being administered. Some basic principles of operant conditioning: a. Shaping and Chaining b. Schedule of reinforcement
a. Shaping and Chaining:
Shaping is based on the principle that a little can eventually go a long way. The organism undergoing shaping receives a reward for each small step toward a final goal—the target response—rather than only for the final response. At first, actions even remotely resembling the target behavior—termed successive approximations—are followed by a reward. Gradually, closer and closer approximations of the final target behavior are required before the reward is given. Shaping, then, helps organisms acquire, or construct, new and more complex forms of behavior from simpler behavior. Chaining is a procedure that establishes a sequence of responses, which lead to a reward following the final response in the chain. For eg. in the routine performed by the circus animal, trainers establish a sequence, or chain, of responses, the last of which leads to a reward. Trainers usually begin chaining by first shaping the final response. When this response is well established, the trainer shapes responses earlier in the chain, then reinforces them by giving the animal the opportunity to perform responses later in the chain, the last of which produces the reinforce. Shaping and chaining obviously have important implications for human behavior. For example, when working with a beginning student, a skilled dance teacher or ski instructor may use shaping techniques to establish basic skills, such as performing a basic step or standing on the skis without falling down, by praising simple accomplishments. As training progresses, however, the student may receive praise only when he or she successfully completes an entire sequence or chain of actions, such as skiing down a small slope b. Schedule of reinforcement Under natural conditions reinforcement is often an uncertain event. Sometimes a given response yields a reward every time it occurs, but sometimes it does not. Schedules of Reinforcement: Rules determining when and how reinforcements will be delivered. Continuous Reinforcement Schedule: A schedule of reinforcement in which every occurrence of a particular behavior is reinforced. Variable-Interval Schedule: A schedule of reinforcement in which a variable amount of time must elapse before a response will yield reinforcement. Fixed-Ratio Schedule: A schedule of reinforcement in which reinforcement occurs only after a fixed number of responses have been emitted. 2. Cognitive model (social/observational learning). Cognitive model explain learning as the acquisition of knowledge and the processing of information. Cognitivist emphasize on learner’s thought in the process of learning. The main element of learning are our thinking, imagining, reasoning and remembering abilities. Psychologists working from the cognitive learning perspective have developed approaches that focus on the unseen mental processes that occur during learning, rather than concentrating solely on external stimuli, responses, and reinforcements. Two types of learning of cognitive model are i. Insight learning ii. Observational learning. i. Insight Learning: Insight learning is a sudden realization of a solution to a problem. Because of its suddenness, insight learning is different from trial-and-error learning, which requires more careful experimentation to arrive at a solution. One of the greatest contributions Wolfgang Köhler made to the field of psychology was his work on insight learning. Insight learning is a process of learning that involves perceived solutions, not rewards or consequences. He found that people can learn when they understand an entire situation. ii. Observational learning: Learning by observing the behavior of another person, or model. Albert Bandura examined the principles of observational learning. Bandura dramatically demonstrated the ability of models to stimulate learning in a classic experiment. In the study, young children saw a fi lm of an adult wildly hitting a 5-feet-tall infl atable punching toy called a Bobo doll (Bandura, Ross, & Ross, 1963a, 1963b). Later the children were given the opportunity to play with the Bobo doll themselves, and, sure enough, most displayed the same kind of behavior, in some cases mimicking the aggressive behavior almost identically. Not only negative behaviors are acquired through observational learning. In one experiment, for example, children who were afraid of dogs were exposed to a model—dubbed the Fearless Peer— playing with a dog (Bandura, Grusec, & Menlove, 1967). After exposure, observers were considerably more likely to approach a strange dog than were children who had not viewed the Fearless Peer. Observation learning and aggression: Increasing violent activities among young people due to proliferation of violence depicted on television and in film. Observational learning and culture: Cultural shock: Dramatic differences in language, customs, and lifestyle often lead to unintended misunderstandings between persons from different cultural backgrounds. Behaviors that are acceptable and in one country may be quite offensive to persons from another count. To soften the effects of culture shock, experts in the area of cross-cultural training have advocated an experiential approach based on behavioral modeling .Trainees first watch films in which models exhibit the correct behaviors in a problem situation. Then the trainees participate in a role-playing exercise to test their knowledge. Observational learning : some practical applications Observational learning can play an important role in work settings; for example, in helping workers interact more effectively with people from different cultural backgrounds. It can also play a role in the development of both appropriate and inappropriate forms of behavior. Learned helplessness: It is a tendency to fail to act to escape from a situation because of a history of repeated failures in the past. It is observed in human beings when they have been conditioned to expect pain, suffering or discomfort without a way to escape from it. For eg. when a smoker repeatedly try and fail to quit smoking, then he get frustrated and believe that he can not quit it and then, do not try to quit smoking anymore.