create a website

Electoral Verdicts: Incumbent President Defeated for Re-election in Nigeria. (2016). Awojobi, Oladayo Nathaniel.
In: Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research.
RePEc:nap:nijssr:2016:p:21-30.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 35

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abe, T. (2008). 2007 elections and electoral violence in Nigeria's fourth republic. Journal of Contemporary Politics, 1(1): 1-10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Abramowitz, A. (1988). Explaining senate election outcomes. American Political Science Review, 82(2): 385-403.

  3. Adebayo, H. (2015). Drama as PDP leaders disrupt collation of presidential election results. Available: http://www.premiumtimesng.com/politics/180327-drama-as-pdp-leaders-disrupt-collation-ofpresidential -election-results.html Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research Adekoya, A. (2015). Tinubu: A skilled political strategist as hero of democracy. Available: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/01/tinubu-a-skilled-political-strayegist-as-hero-of-democracy/ African Election Database (2011). Elections in Nigeria. Available: http://africanelections.tripod.com/ng.html Anjov, T. K. and Nguemo, A. D. (2012). Ethics and democracy in Nigeria (1999 – 2011). E-International Scientific Research Journal, 4(3): 171-80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Ansolabehere and Gerber, A. (1994). The mismeasure of campaign spending: Evidence from the 1990 U.S. house elections. Journal of Politics, 56(4): 1106-18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Ansolabehere, S., James, M., Snyder, J. and Charles, S. I. I. I. (2000). Old voters, new voters, and the personal vote: Using redistricting to measure the incumbency advantage. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1): 17-34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Awojobi, O. N. (2014). The socioeconomic implications of boko haram insurgency in the north-east of Nigeria. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 11(1): 144-50.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Awojobi, O. N., Ayakpat, J. and Adisa, O. D. (2014). Rebased nigerian gross domestic product: The role of the informal sector in the development of the Nigerian economy. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(7): 301-16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Awopeju, A. (2011). Election rigging and the problems of electoral act in Nigeria. Afro Asian Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2-4): 1-17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bonneau, W. (2005). Electoral verdicts: Incumbent defeats in state supreme court elections. American Politics Research, 33(6): 818-41.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Jacobson, G. C. and Grant, T. J. (2000). Question wording and the House vote choice: Some experimental evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3): 257-70.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Brown, A. R. (2012). Do voters care about incumbency? : 26. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2108141 Campbell, L. (2002). An absurd system gets even worse. dallas-fortworth star-telegram. Available: http://www.dfw.com Cox, G. W. and Katz, J. N. (1996). Why did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow? American Journal of Political Science, 40(2): 478-97.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Fiorina, M. P. (1977). The case of the vanishing marginals: The bureaucracy did it American Political Science Review, 71(1): 177-81.

  13. Fraenkel, J. (2004). Electoral engineering in papua new guinea; lessons from Fiji and elsewhere. Pacific Economic Bulletin, 19(1): 122-33.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Fraenkel, J. (2006). The impact of RAMSI on the 2006 elections in solomon islands. Political Science, 58(2): 63-85.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Gordon, S. C. and Landa, D. (2009). Do the Advantages of Incumbency Advantage Incumbents? Social Science Research Network: Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8ce1/eca738c226bd3390150666788b228fa2a152.pdf Green, D. P. and Krasno, J. S. (1988). Salvation for the spendthrift incumbent: Re-estimating the effects of campaign spending in house elections. American Journal of Political Science, 32(4): 884-907.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Green, D. P. and Krasno, J. S. (1990). Rebuttal to jacobson‟s „new evidence for old arguments. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2): 363-72.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Horiuchi, Y. and Leigh, A. (2009). Estimating incumbency advantage: Evidence from three natural experiments. prepared for presentation at the university of new south wales.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Human Rights Watch (2004). Nigeria‟s 2003 elections: The unacknowledged violence. New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Jacobson, G. C. (1978). The effects of campaign spending in congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 72(2): 469-91.

  20. Jacobson, G. C. (1980). Money in congressional elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Jacobson, G. C. (1990). The effects of campaign spending in house elections: New evidence for old arguments. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2): 334-62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Jacobson, G. C. (1997). The politics of congressional elections. 4th edn: New York: Longman.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Kay, C. and Onu, E. (2015). Buhari does unthinkable, beats nigeria incumbent in election. Available: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-01/buhari-does-unthinkable-in-nigeria-beatsincumbent -in-election Lewis-Beck, M. and Stegmaier, M. (2008). The economic vote in transitional democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties, 18(3): 303-23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Mayhew, R. D. (2008). Incumbency advantage in U.S. presidential elections: The historical record. Political Science Quarterly, 123(2): 201-28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Molina, J. (2001). The electoral effect of underdevelopment: Government turnover and its causes in Latin– American, Caribbean and industrialized countries. Electoral Studies, 20(3): 427-46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Momoh, A. (2005). Democracy or good governance? Making sense of disempowerment in nigeria (i), in the guardian august 19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Mozaffer, S. and Schedler (2002). The comparative study of electoral governance-introduction. International Political Science Review, 23(1): 5-27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Ncube, M. (2013). Elections and political fragility in africa. African development bank group. Available: http://allafrica.com/download/resource/main/main/idatcs/00070333:f6ce8b8609a01fd960f01adfaa 9a6464.pdf Nwanegbo, C. J. and Alumona, I. M. (2011). Incumbency factor and democratic consolidation in Nigeria‟s fourth republic. The Social Sciences, 6(2): 125-30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research Macdonald, B. (2014). Estimating incumbency advantages in african politics: Regression discontinuity evidence from zambian parliamentary and local government elections. Working paper Series 2014 No.14-151.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Osinakachukwu, N. P. and Jawan, J. A. (2011). The electoral process and democratic consolidation in Nigeria. Journal of Politics and Law, 4(2): 128-38.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Ovuakporie, E. (2015). African peer review rates jonathan‟s admin low. Available: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/05/african-peer-review-rates-jonathans-admin-low/ Parker, G. R. and Davidson, R. H. (1979). Why do americans love their congressmen so much more than their congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4(1): 53-61.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Premiumtimes (2015). Analysis: Research group, eurasia, predicts big win for buhari. Available: http://www.premiumtimesng.com/features-and-interviews/178512-analysis-research-groupeurasia -predicts-big-win-for-buhari.html Stone, W. J., Maisel, S. L. and Maestas, C. D. (2004). Quality counts: Extending the strategic politician model of incumbent deterrence. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3): 479-95.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Trease, H. V. (2005). The operation of the single non-transferable vote system in Vanuatu. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 43(3): 296-332.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Tukur, S. (2013). Jonathan encourages corruption in Nigeria, speaker tambuwal says. Available: http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/151161-jonathan-encourages-corruption-nigeria-speakertambuwal -says.html Ugwuanyi, S. (2015). Corruption is massive under jonathan‟s administration – emir sanusi. Available: http://dailypost.ng/2015/03/19/corruption-is-massive-under-jonathans-administration-emir-sanusi Uppal, Y. (2009). The disadvantaged incumbents: Estimating incumbency effects in Indian state legislatures. Public Choice, 138(1-2): 9-27.

  35. Wosu, E. and Agwanwo, D. E. (2014). Boko haram insurgency and national security challenges in nigeria: An analysis of a failed state. Global Journal of Human-Social Sciences-C: Sociology & Culture, 14(7-C): 11-19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2022). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint).
    RePEc:hal:pseptp:hal-03389172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2022). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03389172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The heterogeneous price of a vote: Evidence from multiparty systems, 1993–2017. (2022). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:206:y:2022:i:c:s004727272100195x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF TULLOCK CONTESTS WITH AN APPLICATION TO U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS. (2021). He, Ming ; Huang, Yangguang.
    In: International Economic Review.
    RePEc:wly:iecrev:v:62:y:2021:i:3:p:1011-1054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The impact of political representation on the provision of public goods and services. (2021). Schneider, Rodrigo ; Athias, Diloa.
    In: Fiscal Studies.
    RePEc:wly:fistud:v:42:y:2021:i:2:p:367-381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. It Takes Money to Make MPs: Evidence from 150 Years of British Campaign Spending. (2021). Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1dp7827s4n8ht8fk3qhmeuvd0o.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. It Takes Money to Make MPs: Evidence from 150 Years of British Campaign Spending. (2021). Cage, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard.
    In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/1dp7827s4n8ht8fk3qhmeuvd0o.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. It Takes Money to Make MPs: Evidence from 150 Years of British Campaign Spending. (2021). Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03384143.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2020). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/10lirmbd5p8h4ae52oi51b4cka.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2020). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/10lirmbd5p8h4ae52oi51b4cka.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2020). Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine ; Dewitte, Edgard.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03389172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Politically Connected Governments. (2020). Mehta, Mihir N ; Kim, Jungbae ; Cuny, Christine.
    In: Journal of Accounting Research.
    RePEc:bla:joares:v:58:y:2020:i:4:p:915-952.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2019). Cagé, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2ahul47tb09rvqfl9eelv7o5ca.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2019). Cagé, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/2ahul47tb09rvqfl9eelv7o5ca.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2019). Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03393084.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The Impact of Incumbent Scandals on Senate Elections, 1972–2016. (2019). Long, Nicholas Chad.
    In: Social Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:4:p:114-:d:220262.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Inside the revolving door: campaign finance, lobbying meetings and public contracts. An investigation for Argentina. (2019). Moncarz, Pedro ; Sofietti, P ; Avramovich, C ; Freille, S.
    In: Research Department working papers.
    RePEc:dbl:dblwop:1392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Limits of regulatory responsiveness: Democratic credentials of responsive regulation. (2018). You, Jongsung ; Hong, Seunghun.
    In: Regulation & Governance.
    RePEc:wly:reggov:v:12:y:2018:i:3:p:413-427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2018). Cagé, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:thk:wpaper:68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2018). Cagé, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine ; Cage, Julia.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7rcgbs4v788terphdvb6a5e8t8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2018). Bekkouche, Yasmine ; Cage, Julia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03393149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Incumbency Advantage in an Electoral Contest. (2018). Cole, Matthew ; Pastine, Tuvana .
    In: The Economic and Social Review.
    RePEc:eso:journl:v:49:y:2018:i:4:p:419-436.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2018). Cagé, Julia ; Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12614.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Electoral Verdicts: Incumbent President Defeated for Re-election in Nigeria. (2016). Awojobi, Oladayo Nathaniel.
    In: Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research.
    RePEc:nap:nijssr:2016:p:21-30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Using Political Financing Reforms to Measure Campaign Spending Effects on Electoral Outcomes. (2016). Wilner, Lionel ; François, Abel ; Visser, Michael ; Franois, Abel.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6232.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Do private campaing contributions affect electoral results? An examination of Argentine national elections. (2015). Freille, Sebastian.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:65455.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Google Insights and U.S. Senate Elections: Does Search Traffic Provide a Valid Measure of Public Attention to Political Candidates?. (2014). Swearingen, Douglas C. ; Ripberger, Joseph T..
    In: Social Science Quarterly.
    RePEc:bla:socsci:v:95:y:2014:i:3:p:882-893.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. The effects of earmarks on the likelihood of reelection. (2013). Stratmann, Thomas.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:32:y:2013:i:c:p:341-355.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Measuring efficiency in the presence of head-to-head competition. (2012). Sexton, Thomas ; Lewis, Herbert .
    In: Journal of Productivity Analysis.
    RePEc:kap:jproda:v:38:y:2012:i:2:p:183-197.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Incumbency advantage and political campaign spending limits. (2012). Pastine, Ivan.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:96:y:2012:i:1:p:20-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The effects of party campaign spending under proportional representation: Evidence from Germany. (2012). Fink, Alexander.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:28:y:2012:i:4:p:574-592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. An Experimental Study of Alternative Campaign Finance Systems: Donations, Elections and Policy Choices. (2011). Zillante, Arthur ; Fang, Hanming ; Shapiro, Dmitry A..
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:17384.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Oil, Corruption, and Vote-buying: A Review of the Case of São Tomé and Príncipe. (2011). Vicente, Pedro C..
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14003_12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Political campaign spending limits. (2010). Pastine, Ivan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ucn:wpaper:201034.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Political Campaign Spending Limits. (2010). Pastine, Ivan.
    In: Economics, Finance and Accounting Department Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:may:mayecw:n213-10.pdf.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Issue Voting and Crime in Gubernatorial Elections. (2009). Cummins, Jeff .
    In: Social Science Quarterly.
    RePEc:bla:socsci:v:90:y:2009:i:3:p:632-651.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending. (2008). Marsh, Michael ; Benoit, Kenneth.
    In: American Journal of Political Science.
    RePEc:wly:amposc:v:52:y:2008:i:4:p:874-890.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Policy Responsiveness and Incumbent Reelection in State Legislatures. (2008). Hogan, Robert E.
    In: American Journal of Political Science.
    RePEc:wly:amposc:v:52:y:2008:i:4:p:858-873.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The impact of money on elections: evidence from open seat races in the United States House of Representatives, 1990-2004. (2008). Duquette, Christopher ; Franklin Mixon, Jr., ; Franklin Mixon, Jr., .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2008:i:2:p:1-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The impact of money on elections: evidence from open seat races in the United States House of Representatives, 1990-2004. (2008). Caudill, Steven B ; Duquette, Christopher ; Franklin Mixon, Jr., ; Franklin Mixon, Jr., .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-08d70004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. An empirical test of why incumbents adopt campaign spending limits. (2007). Evans, Thomas .
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:132:y:2007:i:3:p:437-456.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Selling Favors in the Lab: Experiments on Campaign Finance Reform. (2006). Stratmann, Thomas ; Houser, Daniel.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_1727.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Some talk: Money in politics. A (partial) review of the literature. (2005). Stratmann, Thomas.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:124:y:2005:i:1:p:135-156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Evidence on the importance of spatial voting models in presidential nominations and elections. (2005). Kenny, Lawrence ; Lotfinia, Babak .
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:123:y:2005:i:3:p:439-462.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Does campaign spending work?. (2004). Gerber, Alan .
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Power-hungry Candidates, Policy Favors, and Pareto Improving Campaign Finance Policy. (2003). Coate, Stephen.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:9601.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Why Do Political Action Committees Give Money to Candidates? Campaign Contributions, Policy Choices, and Election Outcomes. (2000). Magee, Christopher .
    In: Macroeconomics.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0004038.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. The Electoral Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: A Natural Experiment Approach. (1998). Milyo, Jeffrey.
    In: Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    RePEc:tuf:tuftec:9806.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the U.S. House.. (1994). Levitt, Steven.
    In: Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:102:y:1994:i:4:p:777-98.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-28 22:24:28 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy