create a website

Knowing Me, Imagining You:. (2017). Breitmoser, Yves.
In: Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series.
RePEc:rco:dpaper:36.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 93

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Biases in Beliefs. (2019). Wolff, Irenaeus ; Bauer, Dominik.
    In: Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc19:203601.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Biases in Beliefs: Experimental Evidence. (2018). Wolff, Irenaeus ; Bauer, Dominik.
    In: TWI Research Paper Series.
    RePEc:twi:respas:0109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. A Appendix A.1 Alternative behavioral concepts Cursed equilibrium The relation to cursed equilibrium (Eyster and Rabin, 2005) has been discussed in the Introduction: Both concepts assume that players have a mistaken understanding of the type distribution. Given the degree of cursedness χ ∈ [0,1], cursed players assign weight 1−χ to the Bayesian case and χ to the event that their opponents’ types are random and uninformative given the own signal. In the latter case, the opponents play the average strategy σi(a−i|ti) = ∑t−i∈T−i Pr(t−i|ti)∏j6=i σj(aj|tj), and overall, cursed players expect payoffs πCurse i ai|ti,σ−i = (1−χ) ∑ t−i∈T−i ∑ a−i∈A−i Pr(t−i|ti) pi (ai,a−i),(ti,t−i) ∏ j6=i σj(aj|tj) +χ ∑ t−i∈T−i ∑ a−i∈A−i Pr(t−i|ti) pi (ai,a−i),(ti,t−i)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. σi(a−i|ti). (9) A strategy profile σ = (σ1,...,σn) is a χ-cursed equilibrium if σi(|ti) ∈ BRti(σ−i|πCurse i ) for all i and ti. I am not aware of independent evidence supporting “random projection” as in cursed equilibrium (as opposed to projection of the own type), but cursed equilibrium appears well-suited to capture beliefs if type sets are asymmetric. Market interactions with one-sided incomplete information as analyzed in Eyster and Rabin (2005) are a prototypical example. In such asymmetric games, type projection appears less intuitive.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Aksoy, O. and Weesie, J. (2012). Beliefs about the social orientations of others: A parametric test of the triangle, false consensus, and cone hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1):45–54.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Avery, C. and Kagel, J. (1997). Second-price auctions with asymmetric payoffs: An experimental investigation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6(3):573– 603.

  5. Bajari, P. and Hortacsu, A. (2005). Are structural estimates of auction models reasonable? evidence from experimental data. Journal of Political Economy, 113(4):703–741.

  6. Bellemare, C., Kröger, S., and van Soest, A. (2008). Measuring inequity aversion in a heterogeneous population using experimental decisions and subjective probabilities. Econometrica, 76(4):815–839.

  7. Bellemare, C., Sebald, A., and Strobel, M. (2011). Measuring the willingness to pay to avoid guilt: estimation using equilibrium and stated belief models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 26(3):437–453.

  8. Blanco, M., Engelmann, D., and Normann, H.-T. (2011). A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 72(2):321–338.

  9. Blanco, M., Engelmann, D., Koch, A. K., and Normann, H.-T. (2014). Preferences and beliefs in a sequential social dilemma: a within-subjects analysis. Games and Economic Behavior, 87(0):122–135.

  10. Blavatskyy, P. and Pogrebna, G. (2010). Models of stochastic choice and decision theories: why both are important for analyzing decisions. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25(6):963–986.

  11. Bottom, W. P. and Paese, P. W. (1999). Judgment accuracy and the asymmetric cost of errors in distributive bargaining. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8(4):349–364.

  12. Breitmoser, Y. (2012). Strategic reasoning in p-beauty contests. Games and Economic Behavior, 75(2):555–569.

  13. Brown, S. L., Fredrickson, B. L., Wirth, M. M., Poulin, M. J., Meier, E. A., Heaphy, E. D., Cohen, M. D., and Schultheiss, O. C. (2009). Social closeness increases salivary progesterone in humans. Hormones and behavior, 56(1):108–111.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Brunner, C., Camerer, C., and Goeree, J. K. (2011). Stationary concepts for experimental 2×2 games: Comment. American Economic Review, 101(2):1029–1040.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Camerer, C. and Ho, T. H. (1999). Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica, 67(4):827–874.

  16. Camerer, C., Ho, T., and Chong, J. (2004). A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3):861–898.

  17. Capra, C. M., Goeree, J. K., Gomez, R., and Holt, C. A. (1999). Anomalous behavior in a traveler’s dilemma? American Economic Review, 89(3):678–690.

  18. Casari, M., Ham, J., and Kagel, J. (2007). Selection bias, demographic effects, and ability effects in common value auction experiments. American Economic Review, 97(4):1278–1304.

  19. Chen, Y., Katuščák, P., and Ozdenoren, E. (2013). Why can’t a woman bid more like a man? Games and Economic Behavior, 77(1):181–213.

  20. Choi, S., Gale, D., and Kariv, S. (2008). Sequential equilibrium in monotone games: A theory-based analysis of experimental data. Journal of Economic Theory, 143(1):302– 330.

  21. Clement, R. W. and Krueger, J. (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3):219–231.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Conlin, M., O’Donoghue, T., and Vogelsang, T. J. (2007). Projection bias in catalog orders. American Economic Review, 97(4):1217–1249.

  23. Cooper, D. and Fang, H. (2008). Understanding overbidding in second price auctions: An experimental study. The Economic Journal, 118(532):1572–1595.

  24. Costa-Gomes, M. and Crawford, V. (2006). Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 96(5):1737–1768.

  25. Costa-Gomes, M. and Weizsäcker, G. (2008). Stated beliefs and play in normal-form games. Review of Economic Studies, 75(3):729–762.

  26. Costa-Gomes, M., Crawford, V., and Broseta, B. (2001). Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study. Econometrica, 69(5):1193–1235.

  27. Costa-Gomes, M., Crawford, V., and Iriberri, N. (2009). Comparing models of strategic thinking in Van Huyck, Battalio, and Beil’s coordination games. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2-3):365–376.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Cox, J. C., Smith, V. L., and Walker, J. M. (1988). Theory and individual behavior of first-price auctions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1):61–99.

  29. Cox, J., Smith, V., and Walker, J. (1985). Experimental development of sealed-bid auction theory; calibrating controls for risk aversion. American Economic Review, 75(2):160–165.

  30. Crawford, V. and Iriberri, N. (2007). Level-k auctions: Can a nonequilibrium model of strategic thinking explain the winner’s curse and overbidding in private-value auctions? Econometrica, 75(6):1721–1770.

  31. Dyer, D., Kagel, J., and Levin, D. (1989). Resolving uncertainty about the number of bidders in independent private-value auctions: An experimental analysis. The RAND Journal of Economics, 20(2):268–279.

  32. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R. (1989). The effect of regret on optimal bidding in auctions. Management Science, 35(6):685–692.

  33. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R. and Katok, E. (2007). Regret in auctions: Theory and evidence. Economic Theory, 33(1):81–101.

  34. Engelmann, D. and Strobel, M. (2000). The false consensus effect disappears if representative information and monetary incentives are given. Experimental Economics, 3(3):241–260.

  35. Engelmann, D. and Strobel, M. (2012). Deconstruction and reconstruction of an anomaly. Games and Economic Behavior, 76(2):678–689.

  36. Erev, I. and Roth, A. E. (1998). Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. American Economic Review, 88(4):848–881.

  37. Eyster, E. and Rabin, M. (2005). Cursed equilibrium. Econometrica, pages 1623–1672.

  38. Fey, M., McKelvey, R. D., and Palfrey, T. R. (1996). An experimental study of constantsum centipede games. International Journal of Game Theory, 25(3):269–287.

  39. Filiz-Ozbay, E. and Ozbay, E. (2007). Auctions with anticipated regret: theory and experiment.

  40. Frederick, S. (2012). Overestimating others’ willingness to pay. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1):1–21.

  41. Galinsky, A. D. and Mussweiler, T. (2001). First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(4):657.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Garvin, S. and Kagel, J. (1994). Learning in common value auctions: Some initial observations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 25(3):351–372.

  43. Gilbert, D., Pinel, E., Wilson, T., Blumberg, S., and Wheatley, T. (1998). Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(3):617–638.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Goeree, J. and Holt, C. (2004). A model of noisy introspection. Games and Economic Behavior, 46(2):365–382.

  45. Goeree, J. and Offerman, T. (2002). Efficiency in auctions with private and common values: An experimental study. American Economic Review, pages 625–643.

  46. Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A., and Laury, S. K. (2002a). Private costs and public benefits: Unraveling the effects of altruism and noisy behavior. Journal of Public Economics, 83(2):255–276.

  47. Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A., and Palfrey, T. R. (2002b). Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. Journal of Economic Theory, 104(1):247–272.

  48. Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A., and Palfrey, T. R. (2003). Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games. Games and Economic Behavior, 45(1):97–113.

  49. Grable, J., Lytton, R. H., O’neill, B., Joo, S.-H., and Klock, D. (2006). Risk tolerance, projection bias, vividness, and equity prices. The journal of investing, 15(2):68–74.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Grable, J., Lytton, R., and O’Neill, B. (2004). Projection bias and financial risk tolerance. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5(3):142–147.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Haile, P. (2001). Auctions with resale markets: an application to us forest service timber sales. American Economic Review, 91(3):399–427.

  52. Haile, P., Hortacsu, A., and Kosenok, G. (2008). On the empirical content of quantal response equilibrium. American Economic Review, 98(1):180–200.

  53. Ham, J. C. and Kagel, J. H. (2006). Gender effects in private value auctions. Economics Letters, 92(3):375–382.

  54. Hey, J. (2005). Why we should not be silent about noise. Experimental Economics, 8(4):325–345.

  55. Hey, J., Lotito, G., and Maffioletti, A. (2010). The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 41(2):81–111.

  56. Ho, T., Wang, X., and Camerer, C. (2008). Individual differences in ewa learning with partial payoff information. The Economic Journal, 118(525):37–59.

  57. Hoch, S. J. (1987). Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2):221.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Iedema, J. and Poppe, M. (1995). Perceived consensus of one’s social value orientation in different populations in public and private circumstances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(5):497–507.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Jehiel, P. and Koessler, F. (2008). Revisiting games of incomplete information with analogy-based expectations. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(2):533–557.

  60. Kagel, J. and Levin, D. (1986). The winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions. American Economic Review, 76(5):894–920.

  61. Kagel, J. and Levin, D. (1993). Independent private value auctions: Bidder behaviour in first-, second-and third-price auctions with varying numbers of bidders. The Economic Journal, 103(419):868–879.

  62. Kagel, J. and Levin, D. (2002). Common value auctions and the winner’s curse. Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Kagel, J., Harstad, R., and Levin, D. (1987). Information impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: A laboratory study. Econometrica, 55(6):1275– 1304.

  64. Klemperer, P. (1998). Auctions with almost common values: The wallet game’and its applications. European Economic Review, 42(3-5):757–769.

  65. Kliger, D. and Levy, O. (2008). Projection bias by investors: A market approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66(3):657–668.

  66. Krueger, J. and Clement, R. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and edocentric bias in social perception. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(4):596–610.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Kurt, D. and Inman, J. J. (2013). Mispredicting others’ valuations: Self-other difference in the context of endowment. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1):78–89.

  68. Limited depth of reasoning The concepts discussed so far have in common that they are defined in terms of the payoff structure π̃i ∈ {πi,πCRRA i ,π Proj i ,πCurse i }. The players’ beliefs about their opponents’ strategies are taken as given. The complementary approach is to vary the belief structure, allowing that players deviate from BNE by violating rational expectations.29 The seminal model in this strand literature, level-k, follows Stahl and Wilson (1995) and Nagel (1995); other belief structures are discussed below. Assuming level-0 randomizes uniformly, σ0(|ti) = 1/|Ai| for i,ti, and given a payoff structure
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., and Rabin, M. (2003). Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4):1209–1248.

  70. Madarász, K. (2012). Information projection: Model and applications. Review of Economic Studies, 79(3):961–985.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Madarász, K. (2015). Projection equilibrium: Definition and applications to social investment and persuasion. Unpublished manuscript.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. McKelvey, R. D. and Palfrey, T. R. (1995). Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1):6–38.

  73. Messé, L. A. and Sivacek, J. M. (1979). Predictions of others’ responses in a mixedmotive game: Self-justification or false consensus? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(4):602.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Milgrom, P. (1989). Auctions and bidding: A primer. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(3):3–22.

  75. Mullen, B., Atkins, J. L., Champion, D. S., Edwards, C., Hardy, D., Story, J. E., and Vanderklok, M. (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(3):262–283.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Nagel, R. (1995). Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 85(5):1313–1326.

  77. Offerman, T., Sonnemans, J., and Schram, A. J. H. C. (1996). Value orientations, expectations and voluntary contributions in public goods. Economic Journal, 106(437):817– 45.

  78. Pearson, M. and Schipper, B. C. (2013). Menstrual cycle and competitive bidding. Games and Economic Behavior, 78:1–20.

  79. Powell, M. (2006). The newuoa software for unconstrained optimization without derivatives. Large-Scale Nonlinear Optimization, pages 255–297.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Read, D. and Van Leeuwen, B. (1998). Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 76(2):189– 205.

  81. Risk aversion Cox et al. (1985, 1988) argue that a potential factor in bidding is constant relative risk aversion (CRRA), u(p) = pα/α with α 6= 0, with expected utilities πCRRA i ai|ti,σ−i = ∑ t−i∈T−i ∑ a−i∈A−i Pr(t−i|ti) u pi (ai,a−i),(ti,t−i) ∏ j6=i σj(aj|tj). (10) CRRA utilities u() can equally be used to complement projection and cursedness. As it stands, risk aversion is the leading explanation of overbidding in private value auctions, but the more recent observations on loser regret, e.g. Filiz-Ozbay and Ozbay (2007) and Engelbrecht-Wiggans and Katok (2007), challenge this perspective (as discussed above).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Ross, L., Greene, D., and House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3):279–301.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Schipper, B. C. (2015). Sex hormones and competitive bidding. Management Science, 61(2):249–266.

  84. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2):461– 464.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Shapiro, D., Shi, X., and Zillante, A. (2014). Level-k reasoning in a generalized beauty contest. Games and Economic Behavior, 86:308–329.

  86. Simonsohn, U. (2010). Weather to go to college. The Economic Journal, 120(543):270– 280.

  87. Stahl, D. O. and Wilson, P. W. (1995). On players’ models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1):218–254.

  88. Tang, F. (2003). A comparative study on learning in a normal form game experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 50(3):385–390.

  89. Train, K. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge Univ Pr.

  90. Turocy, T. (2005). A dynamic homotopy interpretation of the logistic quantal response equilibrium correspondence. Games and Economic Behavior, 51(2):243–263.

  91. Weizsäcker, G. (2003). Ignoring the rationality of others: evidence from experimental normal-form games. Games and Economic Behavior, 44(1):145–171.

  92. Wilcox, N. (2008). Stochastic models for binary discrete choice under risk: A critical primer and econometric comparison. In Cox, J. C. and Harrison, G. W., editors, Risk aversion in experiments, volume 12 of Research in experimental economics, pages 197–292. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Wilcox, N. (2011). Stochastically more risk averse: A contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk. Journal of Econometrics, 162(1):89–104.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Partition Equilibria in a Japanese-English Auction with Discrete Bid Levels for the Wallet Game. (2017). Ray, Indrajit ; Gonçalves, Ricardo ; Gonalves, Ricardo.
    In: CRETA Online Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:wrk:wcreta:34.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Knowing Me, Imagining You:. (2017). Breitmoser, Yves.
    In: Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:rco:dpaper:36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Second-price common value auctions with uncertainty, private and public information: Experimental evidence. (2017). Carrillo, Juan D. ; Castro, Manuel ; Brocas, Isabelle .
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:67:y:2017:i:c:p:28-40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Knowing me, imagining you: Projection and overbidding in auctions. (2016). Breitmoser, Yves.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:68981.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Optimal bidding in auctions from a game theory perspective. (2016). Lorentziadis, Panos L.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:248:y:2016:i:2:p:347-371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Equilibria in a Japanese-English Auction with Discrete Bid Levels for the Wallet Game. (2016). Ray, Indrajit ; Gonçalves, Ricardo ; Gonalves, Ricardo.
    In: Cardiff Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:cdf:wpaper:2016/13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Knowing me, imagining you: Projection and overbidding in auctions. (2015). Breitmoser, Yves.
    In: Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc15:113160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Asymmetry and revenue in second-price auctions: a majorization approach. (2015). Xu, Maochao ; Chen, Jihui.
    In: Journal of Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:spr:jecfin:v:39:y:2015:i:3:p:625-640.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Knowing me, imagining you: Projection and overbidding in auctions. (2015). Breitmoser, Yves.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:62052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The nature of information and its effect on bidding behavior: Laboratory evidence in a first price common value auction. (2015). Carrillo, Juan D. ; Brocas, Isabelle ; Castro, Manuel ; JuanD. Carrillo, .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:109:y:2015:i:c:p:26-40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. An Experiment on Social Mislearning. (2015). Weizsäcker, Georg ; Eyster, Erik ; Weizsacker, Georg ; Rabin, Matthew.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11020.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Second-price common value auctions with uncertainty, private and public information: experimental evidence. (2015). Carrillo, Juan D. ; Brocas, Isabelle ; Castro, Manuel .
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10377.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Maxmin mechanism in a simple common value auction. (2014). Long, Yan.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:123:y:2014:i:3:p:356-360.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The performance of corporate alliances: Evidence from oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. (2013). Beshears, John.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:110:y:2013:i:2:p:324-346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Auction designs for allocating wind energy leases on the U.S. outer continentalshelf. (2013). Griffin, Robert.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:56:y:2013:i:c:p:603-611.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Optimal bidding in auctions of mixed populations of bidders. (2012). Lorentziadis, Panos L..
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:217:y:2012:i:3:p:653-663.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Seller Cheap Talk in Almost Common Value Auction. (2012). LI, Daniel.
    In: The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics.
    RePEc:bpj:bejtec:v:12:y:2012:i:1:n:8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Keeping out Trojan Horses: Auctions and Bankruptcy in the Laboratory. (2011). Onderstal, Sander ; van der Veen, Ailko .
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20110024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The nature of information and its effect on bidding behavior: laboratory evidence in a common value auction. (2011). Carrillo, Juan D. ; Brocas, Isabelle ; Castro, Manuel ; JuanD. Carrillo, .
    In: Working Paper.
    RePEc:luk:wpaper:8510.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Auctions with toeholds: An experimental study of company takeovers. (2011). Nagel, Rosemarie ; Georganas, Sotiris.
    In: International Journal of Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:eee:indorg:v:29:y:2011:i:1:p:34-45.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. An experimental study of auctions with a buy price under private and common values. (2011). Wooders, John ; Shahriar, Quazi.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:72:y:2011:i:2:p:558-573.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The nature of information and its effect on bidding behavior: laboratory evidence in a common value auction. (2010). Carrillo, Juan D. ; Brocas, Isabelle ; Castro, Manuel .
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:7848.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. An experimental investigation of the explosive effect in almost common value auctions. (2008). Levin, Dan ; Rose, Susan L..
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:67:y:2008:i:3-4:p:927-946.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Irrationality in English auctions. (2008). Gonçalves, Ricardo ; Gonalves, Ricardo.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:67:y:2008:i:1:p:180-192.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Experimental Evidence on English Auctions: Oral Outcry vs. Clock. (2007). Hey, John ; Gonçalves, Ricardo ; Gonalves, Ricardo.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:yor:yorken:07/09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Auctions with asymmetric common-values: The first-price format. (2007). de Frutos, Maria-Angeles ; Jarque, X..
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:43:y:2007:i:7-8:p:795-817.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The effect of shill bidding upon prices: Experimental evidence. (2007). Kosmopoulou, Georgia ; De Silva, Dakshina.
    In: International Journal of Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:eee:indorg:v:25:y:2007:i:2:p:291-313.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Level-k Auctions: Can a Non-Equilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winners Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions?. (2007). Iriberri, Nagore ; Crawford, Vincent.
    In: Levine's Bibliography.
    RePEc:cla:levrem:321307000000001005.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Are Disadvantaged Bidders Doomed in Ascending Auctions?. (2006). Pagnozzi, Marco.
    In: CSEF Working Papers.
    RePEc:sef:csefwp:169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Level-k Auctions: Can a Non-Equilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winners Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions?. (2006). Iriberri, Nagore ; Crawford, Vincent.
    In: Levine's Bibliography.
    RePEc:cla:levrem:321307000000000256.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. The Effect of Shill Bidding upon Prices: Experimental Evidence. (2005). Kosmopoulou, Georgia ; De Silva, Dakshina.
    In: Experimental.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpex:0512002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Almost common values auctions revisited. (2005). Levin, Dan ; Kagel, John.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:49:y:2005:i:5:p:1125-1136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. An experimental test of design alternatives for the British 3G/UMTS auction. (2005). Selten, Reinhard ; Sadrieh, Abdolkarim ; Pezanis-Christou, Paul ; Irlenbusch, Bernd ; Abbink, Klaus ; Rockenbach, Bettina.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:49:y:2005:i:2:p:505-530.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Level-k Auctions: Can a Non-Equilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winners Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions?. (2005). Iriberri, Nagore ; Crawford, Vincent.
    In: Levine's Bibliography.
    RePEc:cla:levrem:784828000000000604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Level-k Auctions: Can a Non-Equilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winners Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions?. (2005). Iriberri, Nagore ; Crawford, Vincent.
    In: University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:ucsdec:qt12586197.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Auctions with asymmetric common-values: The first-price format. (2004). de Frutos, Maria-Angeles ; Jarque, Xavier .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:146.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Cursed Equilibrium. (2003). Rabin, Matthew ; Eyster, Erik.
    In: Method and Hist of Econ Thought.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpmh:0303002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Elicited Bid Functions in a (a)Symmetric First-Price Auctions. (2003). Sadrieh, Abdolkarim ; Pezanis-Christou, Paul.
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:c037828e-dcce-4af4-9125-4bd20449f03b.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Winners curse without overbidding. (2003). Offerman, Theo ; Goeree, Jacob.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:47:y:2003:i:4:p:625-644.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Elicited bid functions in (a)symmetric first-price auctions. (2003). Sadrieh, Abdolkarim ; Pezanis-Christou, Paul.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:85.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Cursed Equilibrium. (2002). Rabin, Matthew ; Eyster, Erik.
    In: Department of Economics, Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt7p2911dn.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Efficiency in Auctions with Private and Common Values: An Experimental Study. (2002). Offerman, Theo ; Goeree, Jacob.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:92:y:2002:i:3:p:625-643.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Bidding behavior in asymmetric auctions: An experimental study. (2001). Wolfstetter, Elmar ; Güth, Werner ; Guth, Werner ; WERNER GÜTH, ; Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta.
    In: SFB 373 Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:sfb373:200115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Efficiency in Auctions with Private and Common Values: An Experimental Study. (2000). Offerman, Theo ; Goeree, Jacob ; JacobK. Goeree, .
    In: Virginia Economics Online Papers.
    RePEc:vir:virpap:347.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Efficiency in Auctions with Private and Common Values: An Experimental Study. (2000). Goeree, Jacob ; JacobK. Goeree, ; Offerman, Theo.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20000045.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. IMPORT TENDERS AND BIDDING STRATEGIES IN WHEAT. (2000). Wilson, William ; Dahl, Bruce L..
    In: Agricultural Economics Reports.
    RePEc:ags:nddaer:23285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. An Ascending Auction in the Presence of Rationality and Herd Behaviour. (1999). Gonçalves, Ricardo ; Gonalves, Ricardo.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:yor:yorken:99/8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. COMPETITIVE BIDDING ON IMPORT TENDERS: THE CASE OF MINOR OILSEEDS. (1999). Wilson, William ; Diersen, Matthew.
    In: Agricultural Economics Reports.
    RePEc:ags:nddaer:23421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Prices and the Winners Curse. (1998). Bulow, Jeremy ; Klemperer, Paul.
    In: Economics Series Working Papers.
    RePEc:oxf:wpaper:1998-w02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Auctions with almost common values: The Wallet Game and its applications. (1998). Klemperer, Paul.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:42:y:1998:i:3-5:p:757-769.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-23 12:44:42 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy