Individual Behavior Assignment Instructions

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Individual Behavior Assignment (40 Points Total8% of Your Grade)

Instructions
Complete the Personal Insights: Whats My Basic Personality? questionnaire on page 294 of
the custom edition of your text. Using the Analysis and Interpretation section (pp. 294-295),
calculate/determine your dominant personality type (i.e., which of the five dimensions did you
score extremely high or low oni.e., a 15 on the extraversion dimension suggesting you are an
extravert OR a 3 on that same scale suggesting you are an introvert). If you do not feel
comfortable sharing your actual scores on these dimensions with me, it is acceptable to just state
that you scored high, moderate, or low on a dimension. If more than one dimension stood out
with a very high or low score and you want to discuss multiple dimensions that is encouraged. If
you scored in the moderate range on all five dimensions, just pick one and discuss it. Discuss
your personality type and whether or not it fits well with your current job/occupation. If you are
not currently working, discuss which type of job/occupation would be a good match for your
personality. Use references related to personality and job/occupation/career/etc. to support your
discussion. Cite your references within your discussion and include the full citations for your
references on your Reference page at the end of your document, following the APA Guidelines
that I provided you in Doc Sharing. Submit your completed assignment to the appropriate
dropbox. This assignment is due by 1:00 PM on April 1, 2014. The following rubric will be used
to grade your assignment.

I will consider
how detailed your
discussion is and
how far into depth
you go.

Far Exceeds
Standards
Thoroughly
discusses and
evaluates the
personality
dimension(s),
providing
convincing and
supported
arguments.

Exceeds
Standards
Discusses and
evaluates the
personality
dimension(s),
providing supported
arguments, but
could have gone
into a bit more
depth.

Discusses and
evaluates the
personality
dimension(s),
providing supported
arguments, but
could have gone
into much more
depth.

Score:

(18-20)

(16-17)

(14-15)

(0-13)

Reference
Support

Research from
multiple journal
articles provided
strong support for
the discussion.
Several of the
journal articles
used came from
top-tier journals.

Research from
journal articles
provided support for
most of the
discussion. More
references could
have been used
and more could
have come from
top-tier journals.

Several parts of the


discussion lacked
strong support from
the research
presented in journal
articles. Most of the
articles came from
lower-level journals.

Fails to support the


knowledge
associated with issue
at hand. The few
articles that were
used came from lowlevel journals or
websites.

(18-20)

(16-17)

(14-15)

(0-13)

Depth and
Quality of
Discussion

The more
reference support
you use, the
better. The quality
of the journals is
also important.

Meets Standards

Fails to Meet
Standards
Fails to discuss and
evaluate the
personality
dimension(s), does
not provide
convincing or
supported arguments,
and lacks a
significant degree of
depth.

Score:

Total Score:

___ out of 40

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy