cd-35-TQM VENKATESH 10241E0001
cd-35-TQM VENKATESH 10241E0001
cd-35-TQM VENKATESH 10241E0001
A Project Report
Submitted to
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad,
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Award of
the Degree of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
By
A.VENKATESH
Reg. No. 10241E0001
Under the Guidance of
Dr. P.B. APPA RAO
Professor of Management Studies
DECLARATION
A. VENKATESH
10241E0001
MBA, GRIET
HYDERABAD
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
INDEX
S.NO:
CONTENTS
PAGE NO.
CHAPTER-1
1-4
INTRODUCTION
Scope of the Study
Objectives of the Study
Methodology of the Study
Limitations of the Study
CHAPTER-2
5-18
INDUSTRY PROFILE
COMPANY PROFILE
CHAPTER-3
19-30
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
CHAPTER-4
34-66
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
CHAPTER-5
66-77
SUGGESTIONS
FINDINGS
QUESTIONNAIRE
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Introduction
Since the late 1980s, firms around the world have launched Total Quality Management
(TQM) programs in an attempt to retain or regain competitiveness in order to achieve customer
satisfaction in the face of increasing competition from around the world. TQM is an integrative
philosophy of management for continuously improving the quality of products and processes.
TQM functions on the premise that the quality of the products and processes is the
responsibility of everyone who is involved with the creation or consumption of the products or
services offered by the organization. In other words, TQM capitalizes on the involvement of
management, workforce, suppliers, and even customers, in order to meet or exceed customer
expectations. Considering the practices of TQM as discussed in six empirical studies, Cua,
McKone, and Schroeder (2001) identified the nine common TQM practices as cross-functional
product design, process management, supplier quality management, customer involvement,
information and feedback committed leadership, strategic planning cross-functional training, and
employee involvement.
The goal of human resource management is to help an organization to meet strategic
goals by attracting and maintaining employees and also to manage them effectively. The key
word here perhaps is "fit", i.e. a HRM approach seeks to ensure a fit between the management of
an organizations employees, and the overall strategic direction of the company.
The basic premise of the academic theory of HRM is that humans are not machines,
therefore we need to have an interdisciplinary examination of people in the workplace. Fields
such as psychology, industrial relations, industrial engineering, sociology, economics, and
critical theories: postmodernism, post-structuralism play a major role. Many colleges and
universities offer bachelor and master degrees in Human Resources Management or in Human
Resources and Industrial Relations.
One widely used scheme to describe the role of HRM, developed by Dave Ulrich, defines
4 fields for the HRM function:
However, many HR functions these days struggle to get beyond the roles of
administration and employee champion, and are seen as reactive rather than strategically
proactive partners for the top management. In addition, HR organizations also have difficulty in
proving how their activities and processes add value to the company. Only in recent years have
HR scholars and professionals focused on developing models that can measure the value added
by HR.
Human resources management involves several processes. Together they are supposed to
achieve the above mentioned goal. These processes can be performed in an HR department, but
some tasks can also be outsourced or performed by line-managers or other departments. When
effectively integrated they provide significant economic benefit to the company.
Workforce planning
Recruitment (sometimes separated into attraction and selection)
Induction, Orientation and On boarding
Skills management
Training and development
Personnel administration
Compensation in wage or salary
Time management
Travel management (sometimes assigned to accounting rather than HRM)
Payroll (sometimes assigned to accounting rather than HRM)
Employee benefits administration
Personnel cost planning
Performance appraisal
Labor relations
10
To study and identify the Total Quality Management practices at Lakshmi Hyundai,
Himayatnagar, Hyderabad.
To analyze the effectiveness of Training Programs implemented in the organization.
To study the prevailing practices of workers participation in the organization.
To study the relation between management and employees.
To study the employee perceptions towards TQM practices in the organization.
To identify the customer satisfaction level with product purchased and/or service
utilized.
Research Methodology
Scope of the study
The study was confined to TQM practices in Lakshmi Hyundai, Himayatnagar,
Hyderabad. The employees and customers constituted the universe.
Sampling
For the purpose of the study Lakshmi Hyundai, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad was selected.
The selection of the organization was based on availability permission to a large extent and
convenience to some extent. As it is not possible to collect data from all the employees and
customers of the selected organization it was decided to select a sample of employees and
customers on random basis. Consequently 50 employees and 20 customers were selected on
random basis. The secondary data and information were collected from relevant websites of the
organization concerned.
Data collection
A well-structured questionnaire was developed, test checked and administered on the
selected employees of the organaisation to obtain their views on TQM practices in the
organisation.
Also, a well-structured questionnaire was prepared and collected views of select
customers towards quality of the products and services consumed. The information related to
company and industry was obtained through secondary sources such as companys website,
Google search engine, etc.
11
Analysis
The data so collected through the questionnaires from the employees and the customers
were analyzed and interpreted through the MS Excel.
Limitations of the Study:
12
CHAPTER-II
INDUSTRY PROFILE
&
COMPANY PROFILE
13
14
According to Bloomberg L.P., in 2009 India surpassed China as Asia's fourth largest
exporter of cars.
Indian automobile companies
Notable Indian automobile manufacturers
Ashok Leyland
Chinkara Motors: Beachster, Hammer, Roadster 1.8S, Rockster, Jeepster,
Sailster.
Force Motors
Hindustan Motors: Ambassador.
Mahindra: Major, Xylo, Scorpio.
Maruti Suzuki: 800, Alto, WagonR, Estilo, AStar, Ritz, Swift, Swift DZire, SX4,
Omni, Versa, Gypsy
Premier: Sigma, Roadster, RiO.
San Motors: Storm
Tata Motors: Nano, Indica, Indigo, Sumo, Safari, TL.Aria
Electric car companies in India
Ajanta Group
Mahindra
Hero Electric REVA
Tara International
Tata Motors
15
16
COMPANY PROFILE
HISTORY:
The Company is an authorized Dealer of Hyundai Motors India Limited (HMIL) for sale
of its entire range of motor vehicles. It is also authorized to service & repair of all Hyundai cars
and also deals in spare parts of Hyundai cars.
Lakshmi Hyundai was established in the year 1998 in Himayathnagar with the launch of
Hyundais first car in India- the evergreen SANTRO. The entire business is managed under the
able leadership and guidance of the managing Director Shri K.Rama Mohana Rao.
Soon after the Himayathnagar showroom, came up the state-of-art service facilities at
Kukatpally, Banjarahills and L.B.Nagar. These service centers are well equipped to cater to the
needs of valued customers. The management left no stone unturned to review, research and
implement the latest of technologies and methodologies to improve on the sales, service on the
customer satisfaction. Continuous upgradation of the facilities at the sales and service outlets and
adding to the service agenda each time, had been sales graph go high by the year.
AWARDS:
2012 Awards
Verna gets the 'Sedan Of The Year 2011' Golden Steering Award
HMIL gets the 'Automotive Company Of the Year 2011' Golden Steering Award
Eon gets the 'Entry-Level Hatchback Of The Year' at ET Zigwheels Awards 2011
HMIL gets the 'Best Car Manufacturer 2012' award by Motor Vikatan magazine
The awards received for Best in sales in south region, Best in finance , Top
performer in 2005 and their technicians being awarded with a Gold Medal for standing No.1 in
the world at World skill Olympics held at Korea-stand testimony to the recognition that received
at the global level.
According to the popular belief, a customer walking into LAKSHMI HYUNDAI is
treated like an asset. His/her needs are assessed in the first stage and the customer is educated
subsequently about the product line, service range, allied services, etc., ample information and
time is given to the prospective buyer to make up his/her mind on which car to buy.
Totally focused customer centric approach, unparalleled service motto, top-end facilities,
bouquet of allied services, solid after sales backup, quality assurance, unconditional warranty
promise and desire to excel through service are some of the threads which blend in effectively to
give birth to the fabric called LAKSHMI HYUNDAI LAKSHMI HYUNDAIs success is just
beginning and more to expect spectacular chapters in the preamble Winning Edges.
17
Department
Own
Contract
Total
Sales
57
57
Service
126
49
175
Spaces
15
15
Finance &
HR/Administration
98
98
Total
296
49
345
18
Employment Exchange
All vacancies are to be notified to the Local Employment Exchange. If employment
exchanges are unable to sponsor the suitable candidates with in the prescribed time limits, the
vacancies may be advertised in the press on a local/regional advertisement the vacancies may be
advertised on India Basis. A minimum of two weeks notice is to given to the Local Employment
Exchange for sponsoring suitable candidates.
Paper advertisements
Of the external methods this method is mostly adopted by the organization. This method
of recruitment involves advertising the requirements of personnel in two of the leading
newspapers one being in English language and other being in regional language. For
recruitments in Hyderabad, Eenadu and Deccan Chronicle are the two leading newspapers that
the requirement of personnel is advertised.
SELECTION PROCESS AT LAKSHMI HYUNDAI
After the recruitment process next step is the selection process in employing a suitable
candidate into the organization. At Hindustan Aeronautics Limited the selection process mainly
includes test/interviews. If a candidate passes through the different rounds of interviews/test then
he is employed into the organization. The Personnel Department of each division or the
corporate office will screen the applications received and categorize them to those that satisfy
prescribed minimum educational qualification and experience and those do not .
Personal Manager Interview:
This is the first round of interview for the candidate. The Personal manager checks the
knowledge of the candidate in the applied field along with his positive attitude, communication
skills and so on. On personal dissatisfaction the manager can call the candidate for another round
of interview. He prepares an evaluation report on the candidates' performance in the interview.
Board of Directors Interview:
After the personal manager interview, the next in line is the Board Directors Interview.
There are 4 directors who take the seat of interviewer. Questions about family background,
health details, academic performance and activities, likes and dislikes, attitudes and capabilities
etc. are all questioned. The interview conducted by the Board directors can take any shape from
stress interview to formal or informal interview depending on the kind of department they are
being recruited for. All the directors prepare an evaluation report individually on the candidates
performance in relation to personality, intelligence, attitudes, skills and knowledge and so on. .
19
Current year
2
004
005
Compact
006
8
23
Mid,Exec,&
Premium
33
50
80
Total
213
008
280
56
3
698
8
80
2
986
011
388
22
2
212
010
164
05
1
818
2
009
607
28
306
1
38
007
9
3
15
9
10
4
268
4
608
Table 1
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Compact
Mid, Exec,&
Premium
Total
2006
2007 20082009 2010 2011
20
SERVICE PEFORMANCE
Current year
005
006
Turn over in
US $(000)
2.8
31.4
No. of vehicle
serviced(000)
.4
.9
2
007
2
008
3
82.2
8
45.5
1
150.8
1
8.1
2
011
4
40.4
3.5
2
010
4
40.2
1
1.0
2
009
2
9.1
4
0.0
Table 2
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Turn over in US
$(000)
No. of vehicle
serviced(000)
Current
Year
005
Turn
over
1
11.1
2
006
2
007
2
16.2
2
008
3
26.0
2
009
4
63.8
4
99.8
Table 3
21
2
010
2
011
7
93.8
1
510.9
Turn over
2000
1500
1000
Turn over
500
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Graph 3
SALES TEAM PERFORMANCE BONUS POINTS
Universal Factors
Sub-Factors
No. of
Points
Job Knowledge
Judgment
&
Product Information
100
Communication Skills
75
GDMS Up gradation
100
Accessories
25
Selling
Tot
al points
350
Skills
Sales Personality
50
Presentation Skills
50
Confidence Level
50
100
Appearance
50
Selling Skills
50
300
22
Code
Conduct
Of
Time Management
50
Obeying Orders
100
Alertness
75
Company Dress
50
Attendance Record
75
350
23
24
The 5 core values we have defined as part of our new corporate philosophy are tents that
have existed in us throughout our history, and are principles that all employees promise to further
foster in our organization.
25
26
CHAPTER-III
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
27
2.
3.
4.
End the practice of awarding business on price alone; instead, minimize total cost
by working with a single supplier.
5.
Improve constantly and forever every process for planning, production and service.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Eliminate numerical quotas for the workforce and numerical goals for
management.
12.
Remove barriers that rob people of pride of workmanship, and eliminate the
annual rating or merit system.
13.
14.
The term Total Quality Management has lost favor in the United States in recent years:
Quality management is commonly substituted. Total Quality Management, however, is still
used extensively in Europe.
Total Quality Management (TQM) is an approach that seeks to improve quality and
performance which will meet or exceed customer expectations. This can be achieved by
integrating all quality-related functions and processes throughout the company. TQM looks at
the overall quality measures used by a company including managing quality design and
development, quality control and maintenance, quality improvement, and quality assurance.
TQM takes into account all quality measures taken at all levels and involving all company
employees.
Origins of TQM
Total quality management has evolved from the quality assurance methods that were first
developed around the time of the First World War. The war effort led to large scale
manufacturing efforts that often produced poor quality. To help correct this, quality inspectors
were introduced on the production line to ensure that the level of failures due to quality was
minimized.
After the First World War, quality inspection became more commonplace in
manufacturing environments and this led to the introduction of Statistical Quality Control (SQC),
a theory developed by Dr. W. Edwards Deming. This quality method provided a statistical
method of quality based on sampling. Where it was not possible to inspect every item, a sample
was tested for quality. The theory of SQC was based on the notion that a variation in the
production process leads to variation in the end product. If the variation in the process could be
removed this would lead to a higher level of quality in the end product.
After World War Two, the industrial manufacturers in Japan produced poor quality items.
In a response to this, the Japanese Union of Scientists and Engineers invited Dr. Deming to train
engineers in quality processes. By the 1950s quality control was an integral part of Japanese
manufacturing and was adopted by all levels of workers within an organization.
By the 1970s the notion of total quality was being discussed. This was seen as companywide quality control that involves all employees from top management to the workers, in quality
control. In the next decade more non-Japanese companies were introducing quality management
procedures that based on the results seen in Japan. The new wave of quality control became
known as Total Quality Management, which was used to describe the many quality-focused
strategies and techniques that became the center of focus for the quality movement.
Principles of TQM
TQM can be defined as the management of initiatives and procedures that are aimed at
achieving the delivery of quality products and services. A number of key principles can be
identified in defining TQM, including:
29
Executive Management Top management should act as the main driver for TQM
and create an environment that ensures its success.
Training Employees should receive regular training on the methods and concepts
of quality.
Customer Focus Improvements in quality should improve customer satisfaction.
Decision Making Quality decisions should be made based on measurements.
Methodology and Tools Use of appropriate methodology and tools ensures that
non-conformances are identified, measured and responded to consistently.
Continuous Improvement Companies should continuously work towards
improving manufacturing and quality procedures.
Company Culture The culture of the company should aim at developing
employees ability to work together to improve quality.
Employee Involvement Employees should be encouraged to be pro-active in
identifying and addressing quality related problems.
Appraisal costs are associated with the vendors and customers evaluation of
purchased materials and services to ensure they are within specification. They can
include:
30
Failure costs can be split into those resulting from internal and external failure. Internal
failure costs occur when results fail to reach quality standards and are detected before they are
shipped to the customer. These can include:
Failure Analysis This is required to establish the causes of internal product failure.
External failure costs occur when the products or services fail to reach quality
standards, but are not detected until after the customer receives the item. These can
include:
Complaints All work and costs associated with dealing with customers complaints.
31
32
33
We can provide the education and guidance necessary to gain commitment from the top
so a simple organizational vision can be determined. We also work closely with all leaders to
ensure an understanding of the awareness and communication activities necessary for TQM
efforts to be successful. Support systems are also reviewed to make sure desired behaviors are
being reinforced within the organization's culture.
34
Six Sigma is defined as a measurement tool consistent usage of which transforms each
level of an organization to improve the organizations overall quality and profitability.
Breakthrough Strategy works its way up and down the hierarchies of an organization. Hence, we
help our clients to understand and integrate various processes at every level of the organization
to ensure long-term companywide improvements.
Business Level - Executives at Business level use Six Sigma to improve:
Market Share
Increase Profitability
Ensure corporation's long-term viability
35
36
37
38
CHAPTER-IV
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
39
DATE OF BIRTH
DATA
Mentioned
Not Mentioned
Wrongly Mentioned
Total Employees
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
43
5
2
50
QUALIFICATION
DATA
Mentioned
Not Mentioned
Wrongly Mentioned
Total Employees
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
45
2
3
50
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE
DATA
Mentioned
Not Mentioned
Wrongly Mentioned
Total Employees
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
42
5
3
50
40
1.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Strongly Agree
12
24
2.
Agree
19
38
3.
Neutral
10
4.
Disagree
12
24
5.
Strongly Disagree
.
4%
Strongly Agree
24%
24%
Agree
Neutral
10%
Disagree
38%
Strongly Disagree
41
2.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Strongly Agree
11
22
2.
Agree
19
38
3.
Neutral
11
12
4.
Disagree
12
5.
Strongly Disagree
Percentages
7%
25%
13%
Strongly Agree
13%
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
42%
Strongly Disagree
42
3.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Strongly Agree
14
2.
Agree
25
50
3.
Neutral
10
4.
Disagree
11
22
5.
Strongly Disagree
.
4%
14%
22%
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
10%
Strongly Disagree
50%
43
4.
Do you feel that you are working under human working conditions?
Respondents
Percentage
Strongly Agree
12
24
2.
Agree
15
30
3.
Neutral
18
4.
Disagree
16
5.
Strongly Disagree
12
S.No.
Response
1.
12%
24%
Strongly Agree
16%
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
18%
30%
44
5.
Percentage
Strongly Agree
12
24
2.
Agree
18
36
3.
Neutral
15
30
4.
Disagree
5.
Strongly Disagree
S.No.
Response
1.
.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
6%
4%
24%
30%
36%
45
Strongly Disagree
6.
Response
Respondents
1.
Strongly Agree
10
20
2.
Agree
20
40
3.
Neutral
11
22
4.
Disagree
14
5.
Strongly Disagree
Percentage
.
22%
14%
Strongly Agree
4%
Agree
40%
20%
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
46
7.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Very Good
16
2.
Satisfied
18
36
3.
Okay
18
36
4.
Poor
12
5.
Very bad
40
36
36
35
30
25
20
16
15
12
10
5
0
0
Very Good
Satisfied
Okay
Poor
47
Very bad
8.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Excellent
10
20
2.
Good
23
46
3.
Average
13
26
4.
Bad
5.
Very Bad
.
50
46
45
40
35
30
26
25
.
20
20
15
10
5
0
Excellent
Good
Average
Bad
48
Very Bad
9.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Relaxed
14
2.
Satisfied
17
34
3.
Normal
16
4.
Burden
13
26
5.
Overburden
10
.
34
35
30
26
25
20
15
14
16
10
10
5
0
49
10.
Response
Respondents
1.
Highly Responsible
19
38
2.
Responsible
15
30
3.
Normal
10
4.
No opinion
10
5.
Not responsible
.
40
35
38
30
30
25
20
15
10
10
10
6
5
0
50
Percentage
11.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Matriculation
16
2.
Graduation
18
36
3.
PG/TECH
13
26
4.
Professional
11
22
22%
16%
Matriculation
Graduation
26%
36%
PG/TECH
Professional
51
12.
Response
Respondents
1.
Highly Satisfied
14
28
2.
Satisfied
19
38
3.
Okay
16
4.
Not Satisfied
14
5.
Highly Dissatisfied
Percentage
6%
14%
Highly Satisfied
27%
Satisfied
16%
Okay
Not Satisfied
Highly
Dissatisfied
37%
52
13.
Response
Respondents
1.
Agree
23
46
2.
Disagree
16
3.
Sometimes
12
24
4.
Never
14
Percentage
14
24
Agree
Disagree
Sometimes
46
16
53
Never
14.
How far are you satisfied with the company rules & Regulations?
S.No.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Highly Satisfied
16
2.
Satisfied
22
44
3.
Okay
10
20
4.
Not Satisfied
14
5.
Highly Dissatisfied
14
Highly Satisfied
6
16
20
Satisfied
Okay
44
Not Satisfied
Highly
Dissatisfied
54
15.
Response
Respondents
1.
13
26
2.
Concern
15
30
3.
Difference
12
24
4.
Indifference
12
5.
Percentage
12
Concern
26
24
Difference
Indifference
30
Very much
unconcern
55
16.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Strongly Agree
18
2.
Agree
26
52
3.
Neutral
11
22
4.
Disagree
5.
Strongly Disagree
.
2
6
22
18
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
52
56
17.
Response
Respondents
1.
Excellent
11
22
2.
Good
31
62
3.
Average
16
4.
Bad
5.
Very Bad
Percentage
62
70
60
50
40
30
22
16
20
10
Bad
Very Bad
0
Excellent
Good
Average
57
18.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Always
18
36
2.
In most occasions
14
28
3.
Sometimes
13
26
4.
Never
10
.
40
36
35
28
30
26
25
20
15
.
10
10
5
0
Always
In most
occasions
Sometimes
Never
58
Response
1.
Respondents
Percentage
15
2.
0-1/2 year
1/2-1 year
3.
1-3 years
25
4.
3-5
40
5.
15
15%
5%
.
15%
25%
40%
0-1/2 year
1/2-1 year
1-3 years
5-Mar
More than 5
years
59
2.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Daily
2.
3.
25
4.
15
5.
Occasionally
11
55
0%
.
5%
25%
55%
15%
Daily
2-3 times per
month
Once per month
Once per week
or more
Occasionally
60
3.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Very satisfied
45
2.
Somewhat satisfied
20
3.
Neutral
25
4.
Somewhat dissatisfied
5.
Very dissatisfied
.
45
45
40
35
25
30
20
25
20
15
.
5
10
0
Very satisfied
Somewhat
satisfied
Neutral
61
Somewhat
dissatisfied
Very
dissatisfied
4.
Percentage
Very satisfied
35
2.
Somewhat satisfied
30
3.
Neutral
15
4.
Somewhat dissatisfied
15
5.
Very dissatisfied
S.No.
Response
1.
35
35
.
30
30
25
20
15
15
15
10
5
5
0
Very satisfied
Somewhat
satisfied
Neutral
62
Somewhat
dissatisfied
Very
dissatisfied
5.
Percentage
Very satisfied
20
2.
Somewhat satisfied
30
3.
Neutral
20
4.
Somewhat dissatisfied
20
5.
Very dissatisfied
10
S.No.
Response
1.
.
30
30
25
20
20
20
20
15
10
10
5
Very
satisfied
Somewhat
satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat
dissatisfied
63
Very
dissatisfied
6.
How satisfied are you with the purchase experience of our product/service?
Respondents
Percentage
Very satisfied
25
2.
Somewhat satisfied
25
3.
Neutral
30
4.
Somewhat dissatisfied
15
5.
Very dissatisfied
S.No.
Response
1.
30
30
25
25
25
20
15
15
.
10
5
0
Very
satisfied
Somewhat
satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat
dissatisfied
64
Very
dissatisfied
7.
How satisfied are you with the usage experience of our product/service?
S.No.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Very satisfied
40
2.
Somewhat satisfied
15
3.
Neutral
25
4.
Somewhat dissatisfied
15
5.
Very dissatisfied
.
40
40
35
30
25
25
20
15
15
15
.
10
5
0
.
Very satisfied
Somewhat
satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat
dissatisfied
65
Very
dissatisfied
8.
Response
Respondents
Percentage
1.
Very satisfied
20
2.
Somewhat satisfied
15
3.
Neutral
35
4.
Somewhat dissatisfied
20
5.
Very dissatisfied
10
.
10%
20%
Very satisfied
Somewhat satisfied
20%
15%
Neutral
Somewhat
dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
35%
66
9.
Thinking of your most recent experience with our product/service, how much do you
agree that product/service was worth the purchase price?
S.No.
Response
Respondents
1.
Strongly Agree
25
2.
Agree
40
3.
Neutral
20
4.
Disagree
5.
Strongly Disagree
10
Percentage
.
20%
Strongly Agree
5%
40%
Agree
10%
Neutral
25%
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
67
10.
How much do you agree that the product/service does what it claims?
Percentage
S.No.
Response
Respondents
1.
Strongly Agree
20
2.
Agree
40
3.
Neutral
25
4.
Disagree
15
5.
Strongly Disagree
.
0%
15%
25%
20%
40%
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
68
11.
Percentage
S.No.
Response
1.
Strongly Agree
25
2.
Agree
35
3.
Neutral
15
4.
Disagree
10
5.
Strongly Disagree
15
.
Strongly Agree
15%
10%
Agree
15%
25%
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
35%
69
12.
Thinking of similar product/service offered by other companies, how would you compare
our product/service?
S.No.
Response
Respondents
1.
Much better
45
2.
Somewhat better
30
3.
20
4.
Somewhat worse
5.
Much worse
Percentage
.
20%
0%
5%
Much better
Somewhat better
About the same
30%
45%
Somewhat worse
Much worse
70
13.
Would you purchase or utilize our product or avail our services again?
S.No.
Response
Respondents
1.
Definitely
35
2.
Probably
25
3.
Not sure
15
4.
Probably not
15
5.
Definitely not
10
15%
Percentage
10%
15%
35%
25%
Definitely
Probably
Not sure
Probably not
Definitely not
71
14.
Response
1.
Quality
2.
Installation or first
3.
Respondents
8
Percentage
40
25
use experience
After-sale service
35
Quality
35%
40%
25%
Installation or
first use
experience
After-sale
service
72
CHAPTER-V
Findings
Suggestions
Questionnaire
Bibliography
73
Findings
Most of the respondents have freedom to take decisions. This shows that the TQM effects the
organization.
Employees feel that the management has concern for them, which improves their level of
commitment.
Employees in Hyundai Motor India Limited can see themselves in a better position in near future
which indicates the career growth in the company.
Company is successful in providing good working conditions.
More than 75% of employees feel that they are working under human conditions, so it indicates
that TQM improves the quality of work life.
Majority of the respondents feel that they are under paid.
Employees in the Hyundai Motor India Limited (HMIL) have good relationship with their peers,
superiors and subordinates.
Almost all of the employees have positive attitude towards security as employees feel highly
secured in Hyundai Motor India Limited.
Employees in Hyundai Motor India Limited are satisfied with the company policies and
procedures.
On the whole, employees in the organization have job satisfaction. The contributing factors for
their satisfaction are good relationship, working conditions, Company polices and other benefits,
which have improved with TQM.
From the customer questionnaire, it has been observed that they are much satisfied with the
quality of the product/service.
Comparing with the other organization services, customers are very satisfied with Hyundai
services. Therefore, it shows that the TQM has a positive effect in improving the quality of the
services.
74
Suggestions
As some of the employees feel that they dont have freedom to take decision which affects job
satisfaction adversely, so employees should have some degree of freedom in decision making at
their workplace.
It was also found that employees have low level of commitment as they feel they are not much
important and their concerns are not taken into consideration. This causes dissatisfaction and
creates negative attitude towards management. In order to avoid that the organization has to
make the employees know how much they are important and their concerns have to be taken into
consideration and try to resolve them ASAP.
To avoid dissatisfaction, the company may have to introduce different assertive schemers.
Some of the employees felt that their skills are not utilized completely, so proper measures can
be taken for job design and placement.
It has been found that some of the employees do not feel that they can have a better future in the
organization and cannot satisfy their personal development; therefore, company may provide
carrier development programs where people can achieve their personal as well as the
organizational goals.
From customer questionnaire, it has been observed that some of the customers are dissatisfied
with the after sale services. Therefore, the management has to plan the work unit accordingly to
attend the unforeseen issues and educate the employees that the customers are the first priority.
75
QUESTIONNAIRES
Questionnaire for Hyundai employees.
Personal Data
NAME:
DESIGNATION:
AGE:
B) Agree
C) Undecided.
D) Disagree
E) Strongly Disagree
B) Agree
D) Disagree
E) Strongly Disagree
B) Agree
D) Disagree
E) Strongly Disagree
4. Do you often feel that you are working under in human working conditions?
A) Strongly Agree
B) Agree
C) Un decided
D) Disagree
E) Strongly Disagree
76
B) Agree
C) Un decided
D) Disagree
E) Strongly Disagree
6. Are you able to maintain social relationship with your peer?
A) Strongly Agree
B) Agree
C) Un decided
D) Disagree
B) Satisfaction
C) Poor
D) No Opinion
Canteen(
Loan (
Housing (
Bonus(
Compensation (
A) Excellent
B) Good
C) Average
D) Bad
Security (
E) Very Bad
9. How do you feel about total quality management?
A) Relaxed
B) Normal
D) Over Burden
E) Satisfied
C) Burden
B) Responsible
C) Not Responsible
D) No Opinion
77
B) Education
D) other specify
E) Overall
C) PG /Tech
B) satisfied
C) Dissatisfied
D) Highly Dissatisfied
B) Disagree
C) Sometimes
D) Never
14. How far are you satisfied with the company rules & Regulations?
A) Highly Satisfied
B) Satisfied
C) Not Satisfied
D) Highly Dissatisfied
B) Concern
C) Difference
D) In difference
B) Agree
C) Un decided
D) Disagree
E) D) Strongly Disagree
17. What is your overall opinion of the company?
A) Excellent
B) Good
C) Average
D) Bad
E) Very Bad
78
A) Always
B) In most Occasions
C) Some Timed
D) Never
79
0-1/2 year.
1/2-1 year
1-3 years.
3-5 years.
More than 5 years.
2.
Daily
2-3 times per month.
Once per month.
Once per week or more
Occasionally.
3.
A) Very Satisfied
B) Somewhat satisfied
C) Neutral
D) Somewhat dissatisfied
E) Very Dissatisfied
4.
A) Very Satisfied
B) Somewhat satisfied
C) Neutral
D) Somewhat dissatisfied
E) Very Dissatisfied
5.
A) Very Satisfied
B) Somewhat satisfied
C) Neutral
D) Somewhat dissatisfied
E) Very Dissatisfied
80
6.
How satisfied are you with the purchase experience of our product/service?
A) Very Satisfied
B) Somewhat satisfied
C) Neutral
D) Somewhat dissatisfied
E) Very Dissatisfied
7.
How satisfied are you with the usage experience of our product/service?
A) Very Satisfied
B) Somewhat satisfied
C) Neutral
D) Somewhat dissatisfied
E) Very Dissatisfied
8.
A) Very Satisfied
B) Somewhat satisfied
C) Neutral
D) Somewhat dissatisfied
E) Very Dissatisfied
9.
Thinking of your most recent experience with our product/service, how much do
you agree that product/service was worth the purchase price?
A) Strongly agree
B) Agree
C) Neutral
D) Disagree
E) Strongly disagree
10.
How much do you agree that the product/service does what it claims?
A) Strongly agree
B) Agree
C) Neutral
D) Disagree
E) Strongly disagree
11.
A) Strongly agree
B) Agree
C) Neutral
D) Disagree
E) Strongly disagree
81
12.
A) Much better
C) About the same
B) Somewhat better
D) Somewhat worse
E) Much worse
13.
Would you purchase or utilize our product or avail our services again?
A) Definitely
B) Probably
C) Not sure
D) Probably not
E) Definitely not
14.
A) Quality
C) After-sale services
Thank you for your valuable input.
82
BIBLIOGRAPHY
P. Subba Rao
Stephen Robbins
Wayne F. Cascio
Search Engine:
Websites:
www.hrindia.com
www.hyundai.com
www.lahshmihyundai.com
www.autoindia.com
83