Municipality of Magallon Et Al v. Bezore
Municipality of Magallon Et Al v. Bezore
Municipality of Magallon Et Al v. Bezore
Bezore
GR L-14157, Oct. 20, 1960
Facts:
The Municipalities of Magallon, et. al. instituted estate proceedings in the CFI of Negros
Occidental for the estates of the deceased Anne Fallon Murphy, Thomas Fallon (married to Julia
Fallon) of their various real properties (agricultural & residential) as well as rental deposits with WBC
Ltd. for the benefit of said municipalities. The CFI judge found the petition to be in order and ordered
the publication for escheat proceedings and the hearing to be set.
The petition for escheat was instituted since the municipalities believed that Anne, Thomas, and
Julia had died without heirs. They all died in California on different dates.
An opposition to the escheat proceedings was filed by Ignatius Bezore et. al. He claims that he
is a nephew of the decedents because his mother was their sister. Others also claimed to be legatees of
Anne and other relatives in the case at bar. All oppositors are praying that the petition for escheat be
dismissed and that the properties of the decedent be distributed among them.
The CFI, after uncovering that Thomas died with an heir (his wife) and Anne died leaving a will
(in which she disposed of all her properties), denied the petition for escheat proceedings of the
municipalities. However, the prayers of the opppositors were denied since the evidence they submitted
was insufficient to sustain their claims. As a response, the oppositors appealed said decision.
Issue: Whether or not the CFI judge had authority to settle the estate of the deceased parties in favor of
the oppositors.
Ruling:
No.
The initial proceedings were in the nature of escheat proceedings and NOT for the settlement of
the estate of deceased persons.
Since the CFI acquired jurisdiction by way of the publication of the petition for escheat, it
CANNOT be converted into one for the distribution of the properties of the said decedents. For such
proceedings to be instituted, the proper parties must be presented and the proceedings should comply
with the requirements of the necessary rule.
Therefore, the CFI did not have any power to order, or to proceed with the distribution of the
estates of the decedents in these escheat proceedings, and adjudicate the properties to the oppositors.